Comparison of patient reported outcomes after robotic versus manual total knee arthroplasty in the same patient undergoing staged bilateral knee arthroplasty

In Vivo Kinematics for Various Robotically Performed Total Knee Arthroplasty Implant Designs

Although it is well-documented that robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can improve surgical precision, evaluations of the postoperative kinematics of patients implanted using robotics remain less common. The objective of this study is to analyze the weight-bearing kinematics for multiple TKAs implanted using two different surgical robots. In vivo knee kinematics were assessed using fluoroscopy for 28 subjects implanted with a Bi-Cruciate Stabilized (BCS) TKA, 23 with a Bi-Cruciate Retaining (BCR) TKA, 13 with a posterior stabilized (PS) TKA, and 22 with a cruciate retaining (CR) TKA. All subjects were implanted by the same surgeon using the respective company's surgical robot. All subjects performed a weight-bearing deep knee bend. Parameters of interest include the femoral condylar anterior/posterior motion, femorotibial axial rotation, and weight-bearing range-of-motion. The BCS TKA experienced the most posterior rollback, 13.4 ± 4.4 mm for the lateral condyle and 5.8 ± 2.5 mm for the medial condyle. These subjects also experienced the most femorotibial axial rotation, +9.3 ± 5.3°. Conversely, CR subjects experienced the least overall rollback and most anterior sliding, 0.4 ± 3.8 mm of lateral rollback and 1.9 ± 4.1 mm of medial anterior sliding. Implant design appears to play a significant role in postoperative kinematics. Improved stability is evident in TKAs that account for the ACL. However, no system behaved significantly better nor worse than previously published literature evaluating standard instrumentation. Level of Evidence: Level 3, retrospective cohort study.

Preoperative Sleep Patterns and Their Impact on Outcomes in Total Hip and Knee Replacement: An Observational Study

Background Researching modifiable preoperative risk factors is essential for improving outcomes following total joint replacement (TJR). This study explores whether preoperative sleep performance influences pain and recovery in the early postoperative period. Methods This prospective observational study was conducted at an academic elective orthopedic hospital, recruiting patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR). Preoperative sleep was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Measured outcomes included pain, oral morphine use, day of crutch mobility, independent bed transfer, and hospital length of stay. Results No statistically significant associations were found between preoperative PSQI scores and primary outcomes, although sex differences existed in THR patients regarding early postoperative pain. The correlation between PSQI and hospital stay was weakly positive for THR (r = 0.223, p = 0.082) and negligible for TKR (r = 0.041, p = 0.807). PSQI showed no significant correlation with early mobility (THR: r = 0.111, p = 0.391; TKR: r = 0.115, p = 0.491) or postoperative morphine use (THR: r = 0.108, p = 0.403; TKR: r = 0.170, p = 0.309). Female THR patients had higher pain scores on days 0 and 1 and poorer PSQI scores. Conclusions Preoperative sleep hygiene was not associated with hospital stay, mobility, or pain in the immediate postoperative period after TJR. However, sleep may impact long-term recovery, highlighting the need for further research on modifiable preoperative factors and sex differences in post-TJR rehabilitation.

Preliminary Study on Patient-Reported Pain and Early Functional Outcomes of Robotic Arm-Assisted Versus Jig-Based Total Knee Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Robotic knee replacement has gained widespread popularity globally, although the functional outcomes for patients, in comparison to traditional surgery, remain uncertain. This study aimed to compare patient-reported pain levels and early functional outcomes following robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) and conventional jig-based TKA. The focus was on evaluating differences in pain relief, functional recovery, and postoperative scores at three, six, and 12 months.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 240 patients with tri-compartmental osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA between January 2021 and September 2022. Of these, 120 received RTKA, and 120 underwent conventional TKA. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at three, six, and 12 months using the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Rating Scale, and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Statistical analyses, including t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Friedman analysis of variance (ANOVA), were performed to compare differences in outcomes.

RESULTS

Both the RTKA and conventional TKA groups exhibited significant functional improvements from baseline across all evaluated measures. When comparing absolute postoperative scores, there were no significant differences in WOMAC and OKS scores between the groups at three, six, and 12 months (p-values: 0.198, 0.206, and 0.446 for WOMAC; 0.465, 0.117, and 1.0 for OKS). However, the RTKA group had significantly higher HSS scores at 3 months (p = 0.032) and showed a significantly greater improvement in HSS from baseline at three months (p = 0.004) and in OKS from baseline at six months (p = 0.037). By 12 months, no notable differences in functional outcomes were observed between the groups. Patient satisfaction was high in both groups, with a trend toward greater satisfaction in the RTKA group regarding pain relief and daily activities.

CONCLUSIONS

RTKA provided significant improvements in early functional outcomes, as evidenced by the higher HSS score at three months and the greater improvement in OKS at six months compared to baseline. However, by 12 months, no significant differences were observed between RTKA and conventional jig-based TKA in terms of functional outcomes and pain relief. These findings suggest that while robotic technology may enhance early recovery, its long-term benefits remain uncertain. Further research with extended follow-up periods especially in personalized alignment philosophies is necessary to evaluate the potential advantages of robotic assistance in long-term functional outcomes and implant longevity.

Comparing Rates of Minimal Clinically Important Difference Between Manual and Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between manual total knee arthroplasty (mTKA) and robotic-assisted TKA (rTKA) have not been adequately assessed. We compared the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for improvement (MCID-I) and worsening (MCID-W) between mTKA and rTKA patients.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary TKA (874 mTKA and 439 rTKA) with complete preoperative and 1-year postoperative PROMs were retrospectively identified using a multihospital joint arthroplasty registry. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Form 10a (PROMIS PF-10a), PROMIS Global - Physical, or Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form were collected. The MCID-I, MCID-W, and "no significant change" rates were calculated using distribution-based methods. Propensity score matching was performed to control for confounding.

RESULTS

Similar 90-day pulmonary embolism (P = 0.26), deep venous thrombosis (P = 0.67), and emergency department visit (P = 0.35) rates were found. The 90-day readmission rate for mTKA was 1.7 and 3.4% for rTKA (P = 0.08), and the overall revision rates were 2.2% for mTKA and 0.7% for rTKA (P = 0.07). Revision-free survival was 99% at one and 2 years for both groups (P = 0.65 and P = 0.43, respectively). There were no differences in the proportion of patients achieving MCID-I or MCID-W for PROMIS PF-10a, PROMIS Global - Physical, or Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form. The MCID-I for PROMIS PF-10a was achieved in 65.5 and 62.2% of patients who had mTKA and rTKA, respectively (P = 0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated similar complication rates and MCID-I and MCID-W attainment rates between mTKA and rTKA patients. Future studies should assess MCID attainment rates in the long term and in larger cohorts comparing mTKA and rTKA.

Evaluating the impact of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty on quality of care through patient-reported outcome measures in a third-level hospital in Italy: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

With the shift towards personalized medicine, understanding the impact of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is essential for evaluating its effectiveness and patient satisfaction. The QUAROB (Quality-assessment-of-ROBotic-orthopedic-surgery) study aims at assessing the impact of robotic surgery on quality of care and joint functionality at 6 months post-surgery among patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA.

METHODS

This observational, prospective cohort study included patients from Ravenna Hospital, Italy, who underwent elective robotic TKA (2022-2023), and a historical cohort who underwent traditional TKA (2019). PROMs questionnaires (EuropeanQualityofLife-Visual AnalogScale, EQ-VAS, EuropeanQualityofLife-5Dimensions-3Likert, EQ-5D-3L, and KneeinjuryOsteoarthritisOutcomeScore-PatientSatisfaction, KOOS-PS) were administered within 30 days before surgery and 6 months post-surgery. Statistical analysis involved comparing baseline and follow-up PROMs, focusing on patients achieving at least a 10% improvement (Minimal Clinically Important Difference, MCID).

RESULTS

The study enrolled 214 robotic surgery patients, with 208 completing baseline and 103 completing 6-month follow-up questionnaires. Patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA demonstrated significant improvements in EQ-VAS, EQ-5D-3L, and KOOS-PS scores at 6 months. A significant proportion of patients achieved improvements exceeding the MCID threshold (68.9% for EQ-VAS, 58.3% for EQ-5D-3L, and 68.9% for KOOS-PS). Robotic TKA patients experienced shorter hospital stays (7 vs. 9 days, p < 0.001) and higher engagement in rehabilitation compared to traditional TKA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The QUAROB study provides evidence of the impact and benefits of robotic-assisted TKA, highlighting significant enhancements in PROMs, reduced hospital stays, and increased rehabilitation engagement. These outcomes reinforce the role of robotic technology in improving surgical precision and patient satisfaction in orthopedic surgery.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted vs Manual Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) was introduced to provide surgeons with virtual preoperative planning and intraoperative information to achieve the desired surgical goals in an effort to improve patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures following primary TKA using RA-TKA vs manual instrumentation.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort review study comparing 393 primary RA-TKAs vs 312 manual TKAs at a minimum 2-year follow-up. The same cementless implant design was utilized in all cases at a single institution. There were no significant differences in age or gender between groups. Outcome measures included range-of-motion, Knee Society (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Forgotten Joint Score-12, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, and overall patient satisfaction scores along with complications and survivorship.

Results

Compared to manual TKA, the RA-TKA group had significant higher postoperative KSS Function and Knee scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement scores (P < .001). A total percentage of 95.0% of RA-TKA vs 87.4% of manual TKAs were very satisfied or satisfied (P = .001). Survivorship with all-cause failure as the endpoint at 3 years was 96.9% in the RA-TKA group compared to 95.8% in the manual group (P = .54).

Conclusions

RA-TKA demonstrated significant improvement over manual jig-based instruments in KSS Function, KSS Knee, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, and patient satisfaction scores following primary TKA with no differences in complications and revision incidence. RA-TKA provided a virtual 3-dimensional preoperative plan along with intraoperative information for adjustments to approximate the patients' native joint line and achieve a well-balanced soft-tissue sleeve about the knee for primary TKA.

Early Clinical and Economic Outcomes for the VELYS Robotic-Assisted Solution Compared with Manual Instrumentation for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been developed to improve functional outcomes after TKA by increasing surgical precision of bone cuts and soft tissue balancing, thereby reducing outliers. The DePuy Synthes VELYS robotic-assisted solution (VRAS) is one of the latest entrants in the robotic TKA market. Currently, there is limited evidence investigating early patient and economic outcomes associated with the use of VRAS. The Premier Healthcare Database was analyzed to identify patients undergoing manual TKA with any implant system compared with a cohort of robotic-assisted TKAs using VRAS between September 1, 2021 and February 28, 2023. The primary outcome was all-cause and knee-related all-setting revisits within 90-day post-TKA. Secondary outcomes included number of inpatient revisits (readmission), operating room time, discharge status, and hospital costs. Baseline covariate differences between the two cohorts were balanced using fine stratification methodology and analyzed using generalized linear models. The cohorts included 866 VRAS and 128,643 manual TKAs that had 90-day follow-up data. The rates of both all-cause and knee-related all-setting follow-up visits (revisits) were significantly lower in the VRAS TKA cohort compared with the manual TKA cohort (13.86 vs. 17.19%; mean difference [MD]: -3.34 [95% confidence interval: -5.65 to -1.03] and 2.66 vs. 4.81%; MD: -2.15 [-3.23 to -1.08], respectively, p-value < 0.01) at 90-day follow-up. The incidence of knee-related inpatient readmission was also significantly lower (53%) for VRAS compared with manual TKA. There was no significant difference between total cost of care at 90-day follow-up between VRAS and manual TKA cases. On average, the operating room time was higher for VRAS compared with manual TKA (138 vs. 134 minutes). In addition, the discharge status and revision rates were similar between the cohorts. The use of VRAS for TKA is associated with lower follow-up visits and knee-related readmission rates in the first 90-day postoperatively. The total hospital cost was similar for both VRAS and manual TKA cohort while not accounting for the purchase of the robot.

Robotic assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is not associated with increased patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common orthopedic surgery, yet postoperative dissatisfaction persists in around 20% of cases. Robotic total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) promises enhanced precision, but its impact on patient satisfaction compared to conventional TKA remains controversial (cTKA). This systematic review aims to evaluate patient satisfaction post-rTKA and compare outcomes with cTKA.

METHODS

Papers from the following databases were identified and reviewed: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Online Library, using keywords like "Knee replacement," "Total knee arthroplasty," "Robotic," and "Patient satisfaction." Extracted data included patient satisfaction measures, Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, Forgotten Joint Score, SF-36, HSS, and KOOS. Statistical analysis, including odds ratio and 95% CI was performed using R software. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane's Q test.

RESULTS

The systematic review included 17 articles, involving 1148 patients (571 in the rTKA group and 577 in the cTKA group) assessing patient satisfaction following rTKA. An analysis of proportions reveals rTKA satisfaction rate was 95%, while for cTKA, it was 91%. A meta-analysis comparing rTKA and cTKA found no statistically significant difference in patient satisfaction. Additionally, various patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were examined, showing mixed results across different studies and follow-up periods.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study found no difference in patient satisfaction outcomes in the short to mid-term for rTKA compared to conventional methods. This study does not assert superiority for the robotic approach, highlighting the need for careful consideration of various factors influencing outcomes in knee arthroplasty.

Robotics in total knee replacement: Current use and future implications

Robotic total knee replacement (TKR) surgery has evolved over the years with the aim of improving the overall 80% satisfaction rate associated with TKR surgery. Proponents claim higher precision in executing the pre-operative plan which results in improved alignment and possibly better clinical outcomes. Opponents suggest longer operative times with potentially higher complications and no superiority in clinical outcomes alongside increased costs. This editorial will summarize where we currently stand and the future implications of using robotics in knee replacement surgery.

Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgeon Marketing: Do Claims Align With the Literature?

Background

Robotic total knee arthroplasty (R-TKA) utilization and marketing continue to rise. We examined the marketing on surgeon websites regarding R-TKA benefits and sought to determine if the claims were supported by existing literature.

Methods

A Google search identified 10 physician websites from each of the 5 largest U.S. markets by population with the term "robotic total knee arthroplasty city, state." Claims on websites about R-TKA were categorized. Literature from 2012-2022 was reviewed for data "for" or "against" each claim. Level of evidence for each publication was collected.

Results

Fifty websites were captured that included 59 surgeons. A specific R-TKA platform was mentioned on 68% of websites. Website claims about robotics were placed into 8 major categories. Literature review supported the claims of more precise/accurate, reduced injury to tissue, and less pain with more literature "for" than "against" the claims.

Conclusions

Claims made on physician websites regarding the benefits of R-TKA are variable and not definitively supported by existing literature. Most available data can be categorized into levels of evidence III, IV, and V. There is a paucity of level I evidence to support the various marketing statements. Physicians should be cognizant of both the claims made on their websites and the literature that could be used to support or refute those specific claims.

Identifying subgroups of patients that may benefit from robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Secondary analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The aims were to assess whether a specific subgroup(s) of patients had a clinically significant benefit in their knee specific outcome or health-related quality of life (HRQoL) when undergoing robotic total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) when compared to manually performed TKA (mTKA).

METHODS

One hundred patients were randomised to either rTKA or mTKA, 50 to each group, of which 46 and 41 were available for functional review at 6-months, respectively. Subgroup analysis was undertaken for sex, age (<67-years versus ≥ 67-years), preoperative WOMAC score (<40 versus ≥ 40) and EQ-5D utility (<0.604 versus ≥ 0.604).

RESULTS

Male patients undergoing rTKA had a clinically and statistically significant greater improvement in WOMAC pain (mean difference (MD) 16.3, p = 0.011) at 2-months, function (MD 12.6, p = 0.032) and total score (MD 12.7, p = 0.030), and OKS (MD 6.0, p = 0.030) at 6-months. Patients < 67-years old undergoing rTKA had a clinically and statistically significant greater improvement in WOMAC pain (MD 10.3, p = 0.039) at 2-months, and function (MD 12.9, p = 0.040) and total (MD 13.1, p = 0.038) scores at 6-months. Patients with a preoperative WOMAC total score of < 40 points undergoing rTKA had a clinically and statistically significant greater improvement in WOMAC pain (MD 14.6, p = 0.044) at 6-months. Patients with a preoperative EQ-5D utility of <0.604 undergoing rTKA had a clinically and statistically significant greater improvement in WOMAC pain (MD 15.5, p = 0.011) at 2-months.

CONCLUSION

Patients of male sex, younger age, worse preoperative knee specific function and HRQoL had a clinically significantly better early functional outcome with rTKA when compared to mTKA.

Patients undergoing robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty have a greater improvement in knee-specific pain but not in function

Aims

The aim was to assess whether robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) had greater knee-specific outcomes, improved fulfilment of expectations, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient satisfaction when compared with manual TKA (mTKA).

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was undertaken (May 2019 to December 2021), and patients were allocated to either mTKA or rTKA. A total of 100 patients were randomized, 50 to each group, of whom 43 rTKA and 38 mTKA patients were available for review at 12 months following surgery. There were no statistically significant preoperative differences between the groups. The minimal clinically important difference in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score was defined as 7.5 points.

Results

There were no clinically or statistically significant differences between the knee-specific measures (WOMAC, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)) or HRQoL measures (EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) and EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS)) at 12 months between the groups. However, the rTKA group had significantly (p = 0.029) greater improvements in the WOMAC pain component (mean difference 9.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 18.4) over the postoperative period (two, six, and 12 months), which was clinically meaningful. This was not observed for function (p = 0.248) or total (p = 0.147) WOMAC scores. The rTKA group was significantly (p = 0.039) more likely to have expectation of 'Relief of daytime pain in the joint' when compared with the mTKA group. There were no other significant differences in expectations met between the groups. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction with their knee (p = 0.464), return to work (p = 0.464), activities (p = 0.293), or pain (p = 0.701).

Conclusion

Patients undergoing rTKA had a clinically meaningful greater improvement in their knee pain over the first 12 months, and were more likely to have fulfilment of their expectation of daytime pain relief compared with patients undergoing mTKA. However, rTKA was not associated with a clinically significant greater knee-specific function or HRQoL, according to current definitions.

Operating room efficiency for a high-volume surgeon in simultaneous bilateral robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) has been shown to achieve more accurate component positioning and target alignment than conventional jig-based instrumentation; however, concerns remain regarding its adoption since it is associated with steep learning curves, higher operational costs, and increased surgical time. This study aims to compare the operating times of three cohorts of patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA, i.e., first 50 RATKA, last 50 RATKA (at the end of 1 year), and 50 conventional TKA. This prospective cohort study was conducted at a single high-volume tertiary care center by a single experienced surgeon on 150 patients (300 knees), who were allotted into three equal cohorts of 50, between February 2020 and December 2021. Simultaneous bilateral TKAs were done in all three groups and operative times recorded. We describe the technique for optimizing the surgical time of SB-RATKA for efficient operative room logistics. The operating times of the two robotic-assisted TKA cohorts were compared with the operating times of the conventional SB-TKA cohort. The mean age of the study population was 59(±6.2) years with the majority of females (82%). The mean coronal deformity was comparable between the cohorts. The mean operating time in the conventional CTKA, initial 50 RATKA, and final 50 RATKA cohorts were 115.56 (±10.7), 127.8 (±26), and 91.66 (±13.5) min, respectively, all of which showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). The mean operating times of the final 50 RATKA at the end of 1 year improved by about 36 min with all the SB-RATKA cases being completed in under 120 min. The efficiency of SB-RATKA improved significantly with time and experience, resulting in shorter operational times within a year, revealing the potential of robotic-assisted surgery to surpass conventional approaches in TKA in terms of operating room efficiency.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is not associated with improved accuracy in implant position and alignment compared to conventional instrumentation in the execution of a preoperative digital plan

Purpose

The primary objective of the present study was to evaluate if robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RO-TKA) results in improved accuracy compared to conventional TKA (CO-TKA) with respect to alignment and component positioning executing a preoperative digital plan. The secondary objective was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between the two groups at 6 months of follow-up (FU).

Methods

Patients who underwent primary TKA using the concept of constitutional alignment were identified from the database. Each patient underwent preoperative digital planning as well as postoperative evaluation of the preoperative plan (alignment and component position) using mediCAD® software (Hectec GmbH). Two groups were formed: (i) The RO-TKA group (n = 30) consisted of patients who underwent TKA with a robotic surgical system (ROSA®, Zimmer Biomet) and (ii) the CO-TKA group (n = 67) consisted of patients who underwent TKA with conventional instrumentation. To assess accuracy, all qualitative variables were analysed using the χ 2 test. Tegner activity scale, Oxford Knee Score and visual analogue scale were assessed preop and at 6-month FU. To assess differences between the two groups, a 2 × 2 repeated measures analysis of variance was performed.

Results

There was no significant (p > 0.05) difference in the accuracy of alignment as well as tibial and femoral component position between the two groups. At the 6-month FU, there was no significant (p > 0.05) difference in PROMs between the two groups.

Conclusion

While robotic TKA may have some potential advantages, no significant difference was found between robotic and conventional TKA with respect to limb alignment, clinical outcomes and component positioning.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

From past to digital time: Bibliometric perspective of worldwide research productivity on robotic and computer-assisted arthroplasty

Objective

The number of citations can be used as an impact marker of research work. This study aimed to determine and characterize the worldwide research productivity on robotic and computer-assisted arthroplasty.

Methods

All accessible publications from 1992 to 2023 on robotic and computer-assisted arthroplasty from Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) database were recorded in August 2024. The following aspects were retrieved: cited times, name of author, keywords, institution, country, year of publication, journal, title, topic, impact factor, and H-index. VOSviewer software and Microsoft Excel were conducted to make the bibliometric research visual. The nature of our study is a systematic study and was conducted in China.

Results

1061 articles were included in our study. The total cited times were 27,461 with the average number of 26. The most productive year was 2022, with a total of 158 publications. The United States contributed the highest number of articles (n = 389, 36.66%) and the Hospital for Special Surgery (n = 53, 5.00%) held the leading institution. "Orthopedics" became the dominant topic (n = 894, 84.26%) and the latest keywords "clinical outcomes", "acetabular cup placement", and "satisfaction" have mainly appeared since 2020.

Conclusions

Our analysis gives a comprehensive review of related articles on robotic and computer-assisted arthroplasty from past to future. The United States dominated studies of robotic and computer-assisted arthroplasty and a journal about arthroplasty was the most productive one. "Clinical outcomes", "Acetabular cup placement", and "Satisfaction" may become the future research hotspots.

Adoption of robotics in arthroplasty- a survey of perceptions, utilization and challenges with technology amongst Indian surgeons

Introduction

Total joint replacement surgeries are standard procedures for managing end-stage hip or knee arthritis. Despite advances in technology, some patients experience dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Robotic technology has evolved significantly and has shown promise in improving component positioning, alignment, and surgical outcomes. However, the widespread adoption of robotics in arthroplasty faces challenges such as high costs, a steep learning curve, and limited evidence on long-term outcomes.

Methods

This cross-sectional observational study used a structured self-administered online survey to assess the perceptions of Indian arthroplasty surgeons regarding robotic technology. The survey included questions about the surgeon's background, experience, perceptions of robotic joint replacement, and limiting factors for robotic usage. A total of 417 responses were collected from practising arthroplasty surgeons.

Results

Most participants(78.1 %) expressed a willingness to adopt robotics in their arthroplasty practice if the cost of installation was reduced. Robotic users were more convinced about the benefits of robotics, including improved alignment, reduced pain, faster rehabilitation, and better outcomes. High-volume robotic surgeons demonstrated a greater belief in the broader potential of robotics beyond implant positioning and alignment. The major barriers to adoption were the high cost of installation and limited insurance coverage for robotic-assisted procedures. Lack of formal robotic training opportunities, resistance from corporate management, patient acceptance issues, and limited published literature supporting robotic advantages were also cited as limiting factors.

Conclusion

Robotic technology is increasingly being adopted in India for TKA. The main obstacle to widespread adoption is the high cost of installation. As technology costs decrease, we can expect a rise in the number of installations across the country. Advocacy from national orthopaedic organizations may be needed to address insurance reimbursement challenges. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the perceptions and challenges associated with the adoption of robotic technology in arthroplasty in India.

Improved perioperative narcotic usage patterns in patients undergoing robotic-assisted compared to manual total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RA-THA) improves accuracy in achieving the planned acetabular cup positioning compared to conventional manual THA (mTHA), but optimal dosage for peri-RA-THA and mTHA pain relief remains unclear. This study aimed to compare pain control with opioids between patients undergoing direct anterior approach THA with the use of a novel, fluoroscopic-assisted RA-THA system compared to opioid consumption associated with fluoroscopic-assisted, manual technique.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis was performed on a consecutive series of patients who received mTHA and fluoroscopy-based RA-THA. The average amount of postoperative narcotics in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) given to each cohort was compared, including during the in-hospital and post-discharge periods. Analyses were performed on the overall cohort, as well as stratified by opioid-naïve and opioid-tolerant patients.

RESULTS

The RA-THA cohort had significantly lower total postoperative narcotic use compared to the mTHA cohort (103.7 vs. 127.8 MME; P < 0.05). This difference was similarly seen amongst opioid-tolerant patients (123.6 vs. 181.3 MME; P < 0.05). The RA-THA cohort had lower total in-hospital narcotics use compared to the mTHA cohort (42.3 vs. 66.4 MME; P < 0.05), consistent across opioid-naïve and opioid-tolerant patients. No differences were seen in post-discharge opioid use between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoroscopy-based RA-THA is associated with lower postoperative opioid use, including during the immediate perioperative period, when compared to manual techniques. This may have importance in rapid recovery protocols and mitigating episode burden of care.

Technological innovations in shoulder replacement: current concepts and the future of robotics in total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has been rapidly evolving over the last several decades, with innovative technological strategies being investigated and developed in order to achieve optimal component precision and joint alignment and stability, preserve implant longevity, and improve patient outcomes. Future advancements such as robotic-assisted surgeries, augmented reality, artificial intelligence, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and other peri- and preoperative planning tools will continue to revolutionize TSA. Robotic-assisted arthroplasty is a novel and increasingly popular alternative to the conventional arthroplasty procedure in the hip and knee but has not yet been investigated in the shoulder. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to conduct a narrative review of the literature on the evolution and projected trends of technological advances and robotic assistance in total shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

A narrative synthesis method was employed for this review, rather than a meta-analysis or systematic review of the literature. This decision was based on 2 primary factors: (1) the lack of eligible, peer-reviewed studies with high-quality level of evidence available for review on robotic-assisted shoulder arthroplasty, and (2) a narrative review allows for a broader scope of content analysis, including a comprehensive review of all technological advances-including robotics-within the field of TSA. A general literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. These databases were queried by 2 independent reviewers from database inception through November 11, 2022, for all articles investigating the role of robotics and technology assistance in total shoulder arthroplasty. Inclusion criteria included studies describing "shoulder arthroplasty" and "robotics."

RESULTS

After exclusion criteria were applied, 4 studies on robotic-assisted TSA were described in the review. Given the novelty of this technology and limited data on robotics in TSA, these studies consisted of a literature review, nonvalidated experimental biomechanical studies in sawbones models, and preclinical proof-of-concept cadaveric studies using prototype robotic technology primarily in conjunction with PSI. The remaining studies described the technological advancements in TSA, including PSI, computer-assisted navigation, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and virtual, augmented, and mixed reality. Although not yet commercially available, robotic-assisted TSA confers the theoretical advantages of precise humeral head cuts for restoration of proximal humerus anatomy, more accurate glenoid preparation, and improved soft-tissue assessment in limited early studies.

CONCLUSION

The evidence for the use of robotics in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty demonstrates improved component accuracy, more precise radiographic measurements, and improved early/mid-term patient-reported and functional outcomes. Although no such data currently exist for shoulder arthroplasty given that the technology has not yet been commercialized, the lessons learned from robotic hip and knee surgery in conjunction with its rapid adoption suggests robotic-assisted TSA is on the horizon of innovation. By achieving a better understanding of the past, present, and future innovations in TSA through this narrative review, orthopedic surgeons can be better prepared for future applications.

Robotic Arm-assisted versus Manual (ROAM) total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Aims

The primary aim was to assess whether robotic total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) had a greater early knee-specific outcome when compared to manual TKA (mTKA). Secondary aims were to assess whether rTKA was associated with improved expectation fulfilment, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient satisfaction when compared to mTKA.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was undertaken, and patients were randomized to either mTKA or rTKA. The primary objective was functional improvement at six months. Overall, 100 patients were randomized, 50 to each group, of whom 46 rTKA and 41 mTKA patients were available for review at six months following surgery. There were no differences between the two groups.

Results

There was no difference between rTKA and mTKA groups at six months according to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) functional score (mean difference (MD) 3.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) -5.6 to 13.1); p = 0.425). There was a greater improvement in the WOMAC pain score at two months (MD 9.5 (95% CI 0.6 to 18.3); p = 0.037) in the rTKA group, although by six months no significant difference was observed (MD 6.7 (95% CI -3.6 to 17.1); p = 0.198). The rTKA group were more likely to achieve a minimal important change in their WOMAC pain score when compared to the mTKA group at two months (n = 36 (78.3%) vs n = 24 (58.5%); p = 0.047) and at six months (n = 40 (87.0%) vs n = 29 (68.3%); p = 0.036). There was no difference in satisfaction between the rTKA group (97.8%; n = 45/46) and the mTKA group (87.8%; n = 36/41) at six months (p = 0.096). There were no differences in EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) utility gain (p ≥ 0.389) or fulfilment of patient expectation (p ≥ 0.054) between the groups.

Conclusion

There were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in the change in WOMAC function between mTKA and rTKA at six months. rTKA was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving a clinically important change in knee pain at two and six months, but no differences in knee-specific function, patient satisfaction, health-related quality of life, or expectation fulfilment were observed.