Clinical effects of internal fixation for ulnar styloid fractures associated with distal radius fractures: A matched case-control study

Is surgery superior for distal ulna fractures? a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The management of distal ulna fractures remains a subject of considerable debate within orthopedic practice. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of surgical versus non-surgical management strategies for distal ulna fractures and their impact on functional outcomes.

METHODS

This study followed PRISMA guidelines and involved a systematic search of databases like PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant studies published in English up to December 2023. The search included keywords such as "ulnar styloid fracture", "non-surgical management", "surgical management", and "treatment outcomes". Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and data were extracted on patient demographics, fracture characteristics, treatment details, functional outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, complications, and follow-up duration. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the GRADE system. The meta-analysis used standardized mean differences for continuous outcomes and log odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 1253 studies, which were narrowed down to 12 studies suitable for review after removing duplicates and irrelevant articles. These studies included a total of 709 patients, with 422 receiving non-surgical management and 287 undergoing surgical treatment. The results showed no significant differences in grip strength, DASH score, or VAS score between surgical and non-surgical management. However, a higher union rate was observed with surgical management.

LIMITATIONS

The moderate quality of the included studies and the moderate to high heterogeneity among them are noted as limitations, indicating a need for more standardized research methodologies in this area.

CONCLUSIONS

While surgical management may offer a higher union rate, the choice of treatment should be individualized, balancing the potential benefits against the risks of surgery, as ORIF implants are typically associated with higher ulnar-sided pain rates and limited ulnar deviation due to implant prominence. Future research should focus on standardizing study designs to improve the quality of evidence in the management of distal ulna fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

Evidence from a meta-analysis and systematic review from all relevant studies.

Operative versus non-operative treatment of ulnar styloid process base fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Ulnar styloid process (USP) fractures are present in 40-65% of all distal radius fractures (DRFs). USP base fractures can be associated with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability and ulnar sided wrist pain and are treated by conservative management and surgical fixation, without consensus. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares operative to non-operative treatment of concomitant ulnar styloid base fractures in patients with distal radius fractures.

METHODS

PubMed/Medline/Embase/CENTRAL databases were searched identifying RCTs and comparative observational studies. Effect estimates were extracted and pooled using random effect models to account for heterogeneity across studies. Results were presented as (standardized) mean differences (SMD or MD) or odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

RESULTS

Two RCTs (161 patients) and three observational studies (175 patients) were included. Tension band wiring was used for surgically treated USP fractures. Results were comparable across the different study designs and hence pooled across studies. Non-surgically treated patients had better wrist function at 6 months (SMD 0.57, 95%CI 0.30; 0.90, I2 = 0%). After 12 months there was no observed difference (MD 2.31, 95%CI -2.57; 7.19, I2 = 91%). Fewer patients had USP non-unions in the operative group (OR 0.08, 95%CI 0.04; 0.18, I2 = 0%). More patients suffered complications in the operative group (OR 14.3; 95%CI 1.08; 188, I2 = 89%).

CONCLUSION

Routinely fixating USP base fractures as standard of care is not indicated. Surgery may be considered in selective cases (e.g. persistent DRUJ instability during ballottement test after fixation of the radius).

Ipsilateral fractures of the ulnar styloid with distal radius fractures; to fix or not? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The most common upper limb fracture encountered in clinical practice is distal radius fracture (DRF). They frequently occur due to falls onto an outstretched hand or other traumatic incidents, resulting in a break in the radius near the wrist joint. DRFs often present a spectrum of injuries and are a common reason for emergency department visits, affecting approximately one out of every six patients seeking medical attention in this setting.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed according to the guidelines of PRISMA, using the electronic database search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, and the protocol for the review was registered to PROSPERO. All comparative study designs (prospective or retrospective) that compared fixation of ulnar styloid and no fixation in a case of ipsilateral distal end radius fracture were included.

RESULTS

The current review analyzed 336 patients from five studies, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), two prospective, and one retrospective comparative study. The meta-analysis revealed a significantly higher rate of union in fixation group than the no-fixation group, with an odds ratio of 10.29 (95%CI 4.74, 22.32; p < 0.00001). However, no significant differences were found in other radiological parameters such as radial inclination, volar angle, and ulnar variance. Regarding functional outcomes, the result was equivocal for the two groups regarding DASH/quick DASH score, Modified Mayo Wrist score MD of 0.22 [95 % CI -1.84, 2.28, p = 0.83; I2 = 0 %], grip strength, range of motion, and overall complications OR of 0.53 (95 % CI 0.08, 3.47; p = 0.51; I2 = 86 %), but higher occurrence of ulnar-sided pain, hardware prominence, and paraesthesias.

CONCLUSION

Fixation of ulnar styloid in conjunction with DRF does not significantly benefit patients. Despite better styloid union rates, it increases implant-related complications without improving final function, range of motion, stability, or grip strength. Patients may experience increased ulnar-sided pain due to implant prominence. Therefore, non-fixation of the ulnar styloid process is recommended as it offers no significant advantages.

Treatment of type II symptomatic ulnar styloid nonunions with reinsertion of the triangular fibrocartilage complex

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to introduce an alternative technique for the treatment of type II symptomatic ulnar styloid nonunion by the reinsertion of the triangular fibrocartilage complex and the ulnar collateral ligament.

METHODS

Between March 2009 and May 2017, 45 patients (34 males and 11 females) suffering from the nonunion of type II ulnar styloid fractures all underwent the subperiosteal resection of the avulsed fragments and the reinsertion of the TFCC and ulnar collateral ligament. Outcome assessments included the ranges of motion of the wrist, grip strength, pain, and Mayo wrist score. The preoperative and postoperative parameters were compared. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULT

The mean follow-up period was 21.66 ± 7.93 months (range, 12 to 26 months). At the final follow-up, the mean preoperative flexion and extension were 79.32 ± 4.52° and 74.40 ± 4.36° respectively. The mean preoperative pain score, grip strength, and Mayo wrist score were 32.48 ± 4.00; 23.88 ± 8.38 kg, and 77.72 ± 8.31 respectively. The mean postoperative flexion and extension of the wrist were 80.56 ± 6.32° and 75.43 ± 3.12° respectively. The mean postoperative pain score, grip strength, and Mayo wrist score were 12.41 ± 3.27, 26.31 ± 8.30 kg, and 90.71 ± 7.97 respectively. There were significant differences in pain, grip strength, and Mayo wrist score (P < 0.05), but no significant differences concerning the range of motion of the wrist.

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of the nonunion of type II ulnar styloid fractures, the resection of the avulsed fragments followed by the reinsertion of the TFCC and the ulnar collateral ligament with an anchor was a reliable alternative technique, bringing the satisfactory function of the wrist.

The Japanese Version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation is a Useful Outcome Measure that Potentially Reflects Hand Function in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis who Underwent Total Elbow Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

We examined the relationship between The Japanese version of Patient-Related Elbow Evaluation (PREE-J) and other established subjective and objective outcome measures in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who underwent total elbow arthroplasty (TEA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study involved 46 elbows of 40 RA patients. We collected clinical data one year after surgery, including the PREE-J, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), and Hand20. The correlation and responsiveness to PREE-J were evaluated compared with other outcome measures pre-and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Almost all outcome measures were improved significantly after surgery. Preoperative PREE-J was significantly correlated with preoperative DASH, Hand20, and MEPS. Interestingly, postoperative PREE-J did not correlate with postoperative MEPS. Multiple regression analyses revealed that preoperative grip strength (B = -0.09; 95% CI -0.17 to -0.01, p = 0.03) and preoperative Hand20 (B = 0.31, 95% CI 0.03 - 0.58, p = 0.03) were significant factors those might influenced the postoperative PREE-J.

CONCLUSIONS

The PREE-J was shown to correlate well with other preoperative outcome measures among the RA patients included in the current study. The postoperative PREE-J after TEA was influenced by the preoperative grip strength and function of the hand.

Factors predictive for union of basal fracture of the ulnar styloid process after distal radial fracture fixation using a volar locking plate

BACKGROUND

Some basal ulnar styloid fractures (USFs) achieve union without surgical fixation when accompanying distal radius fractures (DRFs) are treated via placement of volar locking plates (VLPs). The purpose of this study was to seek factors predictive of such healing through the retrospective case-control study.

METHODS

We evaluated 203 patients who received VLPs to treat DRFs in our institute from March 2010 to February 2018; Group 1 contained "union" patients and Group 2 contained "nonunion" patients. Basic demographic, radiological, and operative variables were compared. At the final follow-up (at least 2 years postoperatively), pain was scored using a visual analog scale (VAS). Scores on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) instrument; grip strengths; and demerit points of the Gartland and Werley system were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Group 1 consisted of 58 patients and Group 2 consisted of 147 patients. Univariate analysis showed that age, bone mineral density (BMD), and Gaulke USF classification significantly differed between groups (all p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that BMD (p < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] = 0.214, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.126-0.363) and Gaulke classification (p < .001, OR = 0.092, 95% CI = 0.034-0.250) were significantly associated with USF union, which was significantly higher in patients with mean BMD ≥ -0.12 (the cutoff value) and type IIC USFs. However, postoperative clinical outcomes at the final follow-up did not differ significantly between groups (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 30% (58/205) of basal USFs associated with DRFs united after VLPs alone were placed to treat the DRFs. BMD ≥ -0.12 independently predicted union. Type IIC USFs exhibited more union than other fracture types. Additional surgical fixation of a basal USF accompanied by a DRF treated via VLP placement may be unnecessary, especially if BMD is good and fracture type is IIC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Case-control study.

Does concomitant ulnar styloid fracture and distal radius fracture portend poorer outcomes? A meta-analysis of comparative studies

PURPOSE

An ulnar styloid fracture often occur in association with a distal radial fracture. Whether an ulnar styloid fracture interfere with the results of a distal radial fracture still remains controversial. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of an accompanying ulnar styloid fracture on clinical outcomes in patients with distal radial fractures.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of published studies comparing outcomes of distal radial fractures with an ulnar styloid fracture versus isolated distal radial fractures was performed. Outcomes of function results, radiological evaluation, and patient reported scores were analyzed.

RESULTS

Ten studies including 1403 distal radius fractures were identified fitting inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in wrist motion, grip strength, radial height, volar angle, ulnar variance, pain score, PRWE score, or SF-36 score for distal radial fractures associated with an ulnar styloid fracture versus isolated distal radial fractures. In final follow up, patients with associated an ulnar styloid fracture had lower radial inclination and higher DASH scores. But there was no significant clinical difference. In addition, we found there was no significant difference of outcomes between union and non-union ulnar styloid fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this meta-analysis, we suggest that an associated ulnar styloid fracture does not affect the outcomes of a distal radial fracture and clinicians should be caution in electing operative treatment for patients with an ulnar styloid fracture.