Angular deformity correction by guided growth in growing children: Eight-plate versus 3.5-mm reconstruction plate

Effective time, correction speed and termination time of hemi-epiphysiodesis in children

In children with asymmetric growth on the medial and lateral side of limbs, if there still remains growth potential, the guided growth technique of hemi-epiphysiodesis on one side of the epiphysis is recognized as a safe and effective method. However, when the hemi-epiphysiodesis start to correct the deformities, how many degrees could hemi-epiphysiodesis bring every month and when to remove the hemi-epiphysiodesis implant without rebound phenomenon are still on debate. This article reviews the current studies focus on the effective time, correction speed and termination time of hemi-epiphysiodesis.

Guided Growth Technique for Epiphysiodesis and Hemiepiphysiodesis: Safety and Performance Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Guided-growth modulation is a first-line treatment widely adopted to correct lower-limb angular deformities and limb-length discrepancies (LLD) in the paediatric population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the safety and performance of a new construct (8-Plate Plus or Guided-Growth Plate System Plus, Orthofix S.r.l) used to correct angular deformities and LLD in non-skeletally mature children. The primary endpoint was safety (from plate implantation to removal). The secondary endpoint was performance; patients treated for LLD achieved complete correction if a pre- and post-surgery difference of <0 was observed; angular deformities performance was measured in terms of IMD, ICD, mMPTA, and mLDFA.

RESULTS

We performed 69 procedures in 41 patients. A total of 10 patients had an LLD, and 31 had an angular deformity. We observed nine minor complications in the hemiepiphysiodesis group. One patient experienced rebound. All 10 LLD patient treatments were successful. A total of 30/31 patients with an angular deformity had a successful treatment; the remaining patient had a partial correction.

CONCLUSIONS

Guided-growth by temporary epiphysiodesis or hemiepiphysiodesis was safe and effective for angular deformities and limb-length discrepancies. Further prospective and/or randomized controlled trial studies assessing more significant cohorts of patients and a comparison group could add evidence to our findings.

The efficacy of hemiepiphysiodesis for idiopathic knee coronal angular deformity by reconstruction plate and screw: A pilot study

Background

Angular deformities of the lower extremities are among the most common findings in pediatric orthopedics. Alteration of the mechanical axis in the lower extremity affects the cosmetic appearance and may lead to gait disturbances, knee discomfort, patellar maltracking with or without pain, and early joint osteoarthritis. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of 3-hole 3.5 mm reconstruction plates in tension-band temporary hemiepiphysiodesis for correcting idiopathic knee coronal angular deformities.

Methods

The surgical procedure was performed using an extraperiosteal tension band plate (a 3-hole reconstruction plate) and two 3.5 mm cortical screws to treat idiopathic knee coronal angular deformity in children. The location of the hemiepiphysiodesis was determined based on the type of angular deformity present. Postoperative follow-ups were conducted through x-rays to measure the medial proximal tibial angle and lateral distal femoral angle of the limbs. Statistical analysis was then performed to evaluate the efficacy of the surgical treatment based on the rate of alignment change exhibited.

Results

The study included 14 patients (25 limbs) with genu valgum deformity who underwent temporary hemiepiphysiodesis on both the distal femur and proximal tibia, with 16 proximal tibias and 15 distal femurs being corrected. The correction rate for genu valgum was found to be 0.59° per month for both proximal tibial and distal femoral hemiepiphysiodesis. Six patients (12 limbs) were also identified with genu varum deformity, and the correction rates for proximal tibial lateral hemiepiphysiodesis and distal femoral lateral hemiepiphysiodesis were 0.85° and 0.15° per month, respectively. During a mean follow-up duration of 11 ± 5.7 months, only one case of physeal plate closure was observed, and there were no other significant complications.

Conclusion

Temporary hemiepiphysiodesis with a 3-hole R-plate and two cortical screws takes advantage of physiological physeal growth to successfully treat idiopathic angular deformities with low complication rates.

Growth modulation for angular knee deformities: a practical guideline

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This study aimed to review the established concepts and advances related to growth modulation for treating knee angular deformities. Although they are considered well tolerated procedures, careful indications and accurate techniques are necessary to ensure good results.

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to general clinical and radiographic evaluations, new tools such as two-dimensional low-dose radiography and gait analysis have been used to clarify angular and torsional combinations and the impact of mild angulations on the knee joint. Temporary epiphysiodesis is commonly the choice, and it can be performed with different implants such as staples, tension band plates (TBP), percutaneous transphyseal screws (PETS), sutures, and screws.

SUMMARY

Considering its principles, TBP has been preferred for younger children. Cost can be a limitation, and research for alternative implants such as screws and nonabsorbable sutures indicate they might be an alternative in the future. In adolescents, PETS becomes an attractive alternative; however, its reversible character has been controversial, and further studies are needed to establish limits in younger patients.

Hemiepiphysiodesis for the Correction of Distal Femoral Valgus in Growing Dogs

OBJECTIVES

 The aim of this study was to describe hemiepiphysiodesis for the treatment of distal femoral valgus in immature dogs and to evaluate its effect on the anatomical lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA).

METHODS

 Skeletally immature dogs with distal femoral valgus deformities that had undergone hemiepiphysiodesis between November 2012 and March 2020 at two private veterinary practices were included. Criteria for inclusion in the study were a preoperative aLDFA below the previously published reference range (94 ± 3.3 degrees) and radiographs of the femur taken preoperatively and at growth plate closure.

RESULTS

 A total of 11 dogs fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and a total of 17 limbs were treated. The mean aLDFA was 82.1 ± 3.2 degrees (range: 76-87 degrees) preoperatively and 93.1 ± 5 degrees (range: 76-99 degrees) at the final re-evaluation. The mean difference between the preoperative and final aLDFA was +11 degrees, which was significant. Undercorrection occurred in 2/17 cases, whereas overcorrection was not recorded. The implants were removed in 12/17 cases, and rebound growth occurred in 3 of these.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

 Hemiepiphysiodesis for the treatment of distal femoral valgus is a technique that allows for increase in aLDFA and should be considered as an early treatment in affected immature dogs. Monitoring for possible overcorrection using serial radiography is important. Implant removal when the desired aLDFA has been achieved is recommended because the incidence of rebound growth is uncommon in dogs.

Biomechanical evaluation of temporary epiphysiodesis at the femoral epiphysis using established devices from clinical practice

The aim of this study is to compare biomechanical features of different devices used in clinical routine for temporary epiphysiodesis (eight-Plate® and FlexTack^TM). The tested implants were divided into four different groups (eight-Plate® vs. FlexTack^TM for lateral and anterior implantation) á 10 samples for testing implanted eight-Plate® vs. FlexTack^TM in fresh frozen pig femora for maximum load forces (F_max) and axial physis distance until implant failure (l_max). A servo hydraulic testing machine (858 Mini Bionix 2) was used to exert and measure reproducible forces. Statistical analyses tested for normal distribution and significant (p < 0.05) differences in primary outcome parameters. There were no significant differences between the eight-Plate® lateral group and the FlexTack^TM lateral group for neither F_max (p = 0.46) nor l_max (p = 0.65). There was a significant higher F_max (p < 0.001) and l_max (p = 0.001) measured in the eight-Plate® group compared to the FlexTack^TM group when implanted anteriorly. In anterior temporary ephiphysiodesis, eight-Plate® demonstrated superior biomechanical stability. At this stage of research, there is no clear advantage of either implant and the choice remains within the individual preference of the surgeon.