Retrospective analysis of treatment patterns among recurrent/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma patients who consulted medical oncologists in Japan

Post-Systemic Chemotherapy Prognoses of Recurrent/Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients with Retroperitoneal/Intra-Abdominal Origin vs. Those with Extremities/Trunk Origin

BACKGROUND

The clinical benefit of systemic chemotherapy for recurrent/metastatic retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal soft tissue sarcoma (STS) compared to its benefits for other primary lesions has not been known or sufficiently evaluated.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

We retrospectively reviewed the cases of the STS patients who consulted a department of medical oncology in Tokyo between June 2011 and March 2018, and we extracted the cases of patients with primary sites at the retroperitoneum/intra-abdomen (cohort R) or extremities/trunk (cohort E) who received systemic chemotherapy in a recurrent/metastatic setting, comparing the cohorts' characteristics, chemotherapy details, and prognoses.

RESULTS

Of all 337 STS patients, we enrolled 49 patients in cohort R and 75 patients in cohort E. Liposarcoma was more frequently observed in cohort R (51.0%) than cohort E (22.7%). The median chemotherapy treatment line was two lines (range: 1-6) in cohort R and three lines (range: 1-9) in cohort E. The doxorubicin usage rates differed in recurrent/metastatic settings (90.0% in cohort R and 55.0% in cohort E), due mainly to the higher rate of a perioperative chemotherapy treatment history in cohort E (52.0% vs. 6.1% in cohort R). The median overall survival from the start of salvage chemotherapy was 31.9 months (cohort R; 95%CI: 20.9-42.8) and 27.1 months (cohort E; 95%CI: 21.6-32.5) (p=0.549).

CONCLUSION

There were differences in the distributions of pathology and antitumor drugs used in a salvage setting between retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal and extremities/trunk STS patients in recurrent/metastatic settings, but the prognoses with salvage chemotherapy were similar in the two cohorts.