Relationship between lumbopelvic discordance and locomotive syndrome in a middle-aged community-living population: The Yakumo study

Preoperative Spinal Sagittal Alignment Affects Improvement of Locomotive Syndrome by Four Years After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Introduction Most patients with hip osteoarthritis requiring total hip arthroplasty suffer from locomotive syndrome stage 3, which indicates difficulty with mobility and social participation. Although total hip arthroplasty improves their locomotive syndrome stage, some patients remain at locomotive syndrome stage 3 after total hip arthroplasty, despite hip function improvement. Patients with severe hip osteoarthritis may have an abnormal spinal sagittal alignment. This study investigated the influence of preoperative spinopelvic parameters for locomotive syndrome improvement at four years after total hip arthroplasty. Methods This retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained database included 65 patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they showed improvement from Locomotive Syndrome stage 3 at four years postoperatively: improved group (n = 51) and unchanged group (n = 14). Preoperative spinopelvic parameters were compared between the two groups and examined using logistic analysis to determine locomotive syndrome improvement. The cut-off values for preoperative key factors of locomotive syndrome improvement obtained using logistic analysis were determined using receiver operating characteristics analysis. Results Preoperative sagittal vertical axis was significantly larger and sacral slope was significantly smaller in the unchanged group than in the improved group. In the logistic regression analysis, preoperative sacral slope and the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25) were identified as factors associated with locomotive syndrome improvement. The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the cut-off values of preoperative sacral slope and GLFS-25 for locomotive syndrome improvement were 32.5° and 44.5, respectively. Conclusions Among hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients with locomotive syndrome stage 3, those who have small preoperative sacral slope and large preoperative GLFS-25 score may have difficulty improving their postoperative mobility. Therefore, it may be useful to suggest preoperatively that such patients should be prepared to use social services and other services after surgery to support their postoperative mobility.

Fall risk in patient with dysplastic hip osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

Patients with dysplastic hip osteo arthritis (DHOA) often have a spinopelvic imbalance, and they are more likely to experience falls. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for falls in patients with DHOA, including spinopelvic parameters.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 103 patients with DHOA were included from 2019 to 2021. Fall risk was evaluated using the Fall Risk Index 5 items version (FRI-5). Demographics, functional outcomes, and spinopelvic parameters were compared between the high-risk group (FRI-5 ≥ 6) and the low-risk group (FRI-5 < 6). Multivariate analysis was performed using factors with significant differences in univariate analysis.

RESULTS

High-risk and low-risk groups comprised 54 and 49 patients, respectively. Females were significantly more common in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group. The Harris Hip Score was significantly lower in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group (p = 0.02). Pelvic incidence, tilt, and obliquity were significantly higher in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group (p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 3.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-12.64, p = 0.03), pelvic obliquity (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.09-1.71, p < 0.01), and Harris hip score (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99, p = 0.02) were identified as risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Female sex, pelvic obliquity, and low Harris hip score were associated with an increased risk of falls among patients with DHOA.

Prevalence of global spinal malalignment and the influence on LBP and HR-QOL in a healthy, nonelderly population. A cross sectional analysis, including bone mineral density, skeletal muscle mass index, and back muscle extensor strength

Background

In healthy, nonelderly populations, prevalence of 3 modifiers of global spinal malalignment (GS-MalAlign) (PT ≧20°, PI-LL≧10°, SVA≧40 mm) remains unknown. The clinical significance has not been determined. The purposes are to disclose the prevalence of the 3 modifiers of GS-MalAlign, and evaluate the influence on LBP, and HR-QOL related to bone mineral density (BMD), skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), and back muscle extensors strength (BMES) in a healthy, nonelderly population.

Methods

A mono-centric, cross-sectional survey. Three hundred and 2 participants (18< age <65 years) without ADL disturbance were consecutively enrolled. Sagittal parameters of the spine and the pelvis were measure on whole spine radiograms. BMD and SMI were determined using DEXA. BMES was defined as a maximum extension force at the T4 to T7 level and measured by a strain-gauge dynamotor. LBP was checked through interview. HR-QOL was ascertained by score of Medical Outcome Study Short-Form 36-Health Survey (SF-36v2).

Results

The final analysis could be done in 84 females and 179 males. PT≧20°, PI-LL≧10°, and SVA≧40 mm were found in 12% (31/263), 11% (31/263), and 6% (16/263), and each mean value was 25.0 ± 4.0°, 15.3 ± 5.9°, and 52.7 ± 12.2 mm (Mean ± S.D.). Prevalence of LBP was significantly higher in the participants with PI-LL≧10° than with PI-LL<10°; 43% (12/28) versus 21% (49/235) (p<.05). PI-LL≧10° only had an association with LBP (OR: 3.0435, 95% CI, 1.1378-8.141, p<.05). Four 2% of participants (4/263) associated with all 3 modifiers had LBP and a significantly lower mental component summary score of SF-36v2 (p<.05).

Conclusions

Some of individuals are associated with GS-MalAlign even in healthy, nonelderly populations. There is a possibility that PI-LL ≧10° results in LBP within a degree of no ADL disturbance, and it is speculated that coexistence of all 3 modifiers of GS-MalAlign would lead to a poor mental HR-QOL.

Does locomotive syndrome severity predict future fragility fractures in community-dwelling women with osteoporosis?

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether the locomotive syndrome (LS) severity affects future fragility fractures in osteoporosis patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 315 women with osteoporosis (mean follow-up period, 2.8 years) were reviewed, of whom 244 were included in the analysis. At baseline, we obtained medical information, bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and femoral neck, and sagittal vertical axis. Additionally, LS risk was assessed using the two-step test, stand-up test, and 25-question geriatric locomotive function scale scores. The LS risk test results were used to classify LS severity, which was rated on a 4-point scale from stage 0 (robust) to 3 (worsening). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to determine the association of the severity with future fragility fracture.

RESULTS

Fragility fractures occurred in 37 of 315 participants (11.8%). This study showed that sagittal vertical axis (hazard ratio = 1.014; 95% confidence interval, 1.005-1.023; p value = 0.003) and LS severity (hazard ratio =1.748; 95% confidence interval, 1.133-2.699; p = 0.012) were independent risk factors for incidence of fragility fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed the LS severity to predicted fragility fractures. We suggested that the progression of LS associated with osteoporosis increases the fracture risk.

Stand-up test predicts occurrence of non-traumatic vertebral fracture in outpatient women with osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this retrospective study was to clarify the incidence of non-traumatic vertebral fracture among outpatient women with osteoporosis and to determine whether the stand-up test predicted the occurrence of non-traumatic vertebral fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 242 postmenopausal women over 60 years of age who received outpatient osteoporosis treatment at our hospital between November 2013 and July 2020 were longitudinally evaluated in this study. We obtained medical information and radiographic parameters, including sagittal vertical axis, thoracic kyphosis, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope at baseline. Additionally, we measured physical parameters, including height, weight, body mass index, lumbar bone mineral density, visual analog scale score for pain, and the stand-up test.

RESULTS

Vertebral fractures occurred in 20 of 242 participants (8.3%), and accounted for 48.8% the 41 total fractures in the study group. Among vertebral fractures, eight (40.0%) were traumatic, resulting from falls, and 12 (60.0%) were non-traumatic. Cox multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, body mass index, lumbar bone mineral density, and the time to non-traumatic vertebral fracture showed that the sagittal vertical axis (HR = 1.013, 95% CI 1.001-1.026), stand-up test score (HR = 3.977, 95% CI 1.156-13.683), and presence of difficulty with standing from a 20-cm-high seat using both legs (HR = 3.329, 95% CI 1.625-6.82) were independent risk factors for the occurrence of non-traumatic vertebral fracture.

CONCLUSION

The stand-up test may be useful as a simple screening tool for non-traumatic vertebral fracture in patients with osteoporosis.

Locomotive syndrome: Prevalence, surgical outcomes, and physical performance of patients treated to correct adult spinal deformity

BACKGROUND

Locomotive syndrome (LS) was proposed by the Japanese Orthopedic Association and refers to a scenario in which imminent future nursing care services will be required by elderly adults to manage the functional deterioration of their locomotive organs. It is a social imperative to clarify the risk factors and treatment strategy for LS. However, the relationship between LS and adult spinal deformity (ASD) in those who are treated with spinal corrective surgery remains largely unknown.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients who had ASD and underwent spinal surgery for their disorder were included in this study. Locomotive dysfunction was evaluated using the 25-item Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale-25 (GLFS-25) questionnaire and physical performance tests including the one-legged standing test, the two-step test, the stand-up test, the handgrip strength, and gait speed test which were measured preoperatively, 6 months after surgery, and 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

Of the patients with ASD treated surgically, 95% of them had LS preoperatively and LS prevalence decreased significantly 1 year after surgery by 67.5% compared with the preoperative rate. Among physical performance tests, the walking stride and one-legged standing test improved significantly after spinal corrective surgery. The GLFS-25 items for the domains of pain, mobility, and domestic life improved overall postoperatively, whereas items in the self-care domain did not and the item for difficulty in putting on and taking off trousers and pants worsened.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal corrective surgery significantly improved physical performance tests as well as the frequency and severity of LS in patients with ASD. However, some GLFS-25 items can worsen after surgery and require attention.