Which is the optimal minimally invasive treatment for osteoid osteoma of the hip? A systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

Management of Central Poststroke Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Central poststroke pain (CPSP) is a neuropathic pain condition prevalent in 8 to 35% of stroke patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide insight into the effectiveness of available pharmacological, physical, psychological, and neuromodulation interventions in reducing pain in CPSP patients (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022371835). Secondary outcomes included mood, sleep, global impression of change, and physical responses. Data extraction included participant demographics, stroke etiology, pain characteristics, pain reduction scores, and secondary outcome metrics. Forty-two original studies were included, with a total of 1,451 participants. No studies providing psychological therapy to CPSP patients were identified. Twelve studies met requirements for a random-effects meta-analyses that found pharmacological therapy to have a small effect on mean pain score (SMD = -.36, 96.0% confidence interval [-.68, -.03]), physical interventions did not show a significant effect (SMD = -.55 [-1.28, .18]), and neuromodulation treatments had a moderate effect (SMD = -.64 [-1.08, -.19]). Fourteen studies were included in proportional meta-analysis with pharmacological studies having a moderate effect (58.3% mean pain reduction [-36.51, -80.15]) and neuromodulation studies a small effect (31.1% mean pain reduction [-43.45, -18.76]). Sixteen studies were included in the narrative review, the findings from which largely supported meta-analysis results. Duloxetine, amitriptyline, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation had the most robust evidence for their effectiveness in alleviating CPSP-induced pain. Further multicenter placebo-controlled research is needed to ascertain the effectiveness of physical therapies, such as acupuncture and virtual reality, and invasive and noninvasive neuromodulation treatments. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a top-down and bottom-up overview of evidence for the effectiveness of different pharmacological, physical, and neuromodulation treatments of CPSP. This review could provide clinicians with a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness and tolerability of different treatment types.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes after Radiofrequency Ablation of Osteoid Osteomas

The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment of osteoid osteomas using bipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and patients' quality of life before and after therapy. We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent bipolar RFA of osteoid osteomas between 2001 and 2016. We assessed patients' symptoms before and after treatment (four weeks after treatment and long-term) using a questionnaire including severity and quality of pain on a 10-point scale (1 = no pain, 10 = severe pain), motion restrictions, pain-related sleep disorders, and necessary pain medication. In addition, we evaluated technical success, complications, hospitalization length, and patients' satisfaction with treatment. This study included 62 patients (43 [69.4%] males, 26.2 ± 13.2 years). Average nidus size was 5.7 ± 2.6 mm. The rate of technical success was 100%. All RFAs were performed without any complications. One patient showed a recurrence, resulting in a recurrence rate of 1.6%, which was successfully treated by another session of RFA. Average hospitalization length was 1.5 ± 0.5 days. A total of 36 patients (58.1%) participated in the questionnaire, reporting an average pain severity of 8.2 ± 1.6 before RFA compared to 3.4 ± 3.0 four weeks after and an average of 2.1 ± 2.3, 6.6 years after therapy, (both p < 0.001). After therapy, 31 (86.1%) patients had no pain. The majority of patients (n = 34, 94.4%) had reduced or absent motion restriction after therapy (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction rate was 91.7%. In conclusion, bipolar RFA is a safe and effective treatment modality for osteoid osteomas and improves quality of life by reducing pain severity and motion restrictions.

Midterm Clinical, Radiological, and Functional Results of Arthroscopic Excision of Osteoid Osteoma of the Hip Joint: a Case Series

Purpose

We aimed to evaluate the midterm functional and clinical outcomes of the patients who underwent arthroscopic excision of hip osteoid osteoma (OO).

Methods

We reviewed records of patients diagnosed with intra-articular hip OO, treated with hip arthroscopic excision procedure, and a minimum of 1-year postoperative between 2011 and 2020. Clinical outcomes were assessed range of motion (ROM) pre and postoperatively, and functional outcomes were evaluated with a modified Harris hip score (modified HHS) and Visual analog scale test. All patients were assessed by hip radiography, and three radiological measurements, including lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), alpha angle, and Tönnis angle, were measured. These parameters were compared with unaffected hips.

Results

Fifteen (5 female and 10 male) patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 32.6 ± 12.7 (range 12-53). The average postoperative follow-up period was 59.1 ± 28 (range 13-106) months. The functional and clinical scores were significantly improved at the final visit compared to the preoperative values. No differences were found between the operated and unaffected sides with respect to the radiological parameters. The preoperative alpha was significantly higher on the operated side than on the unaffected side (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

In this study, within an average of 5 years after surgery, hip arthroscopy provided successful clinical outcomes in the treatment of OO of the hip joint without recurrence. The modified HHS, VAS, and HOS values improved significantly at the final follow-up; 14 of 15 patients had satisfactory outcomes after hip arthroscopy for hip OO.

Level of Evidence

Prognostic Level IV study.

Osteoid Osteoma of the Proximal Femur: Pitfalls in Diagnosis and Performance of Open Surgical Resection

Aims

Proximal femoral osteoid osteoma (OO) is extremely easy to be misdiagnosed or missed. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical data of patients with proximal femoral OO in order to determine the clinical manifestation and imaging characteristics of the disease, so as to provide help for the preoperative diagnosis and clinical treatment of proximal femoral OO.

Methods

This was a retrospective study involving 35 patients with proximal femoral OO admitted into our hospital from January 2015 to January 2021. The baseline characteristics of the participants included; 24 males and 11 females, aged between 13 and 25 (mean 16.2) years old, and the course of the disease was 1 to 14 (mean 6.3) months. We used previous medical experience records of the patients to analyze for the causes of misdiagnosis. Moreover, we compared the difference between preoperative and postoperative treatment practices in alleviating pain in OO patients and restoring hip function. Follow-ups were carried out regularly, and patients advised to avoid strenuous exercises for 3 months.

Results

We followed up 35 patients (25 intercortical, 4 sub-periosteal, and 6 medullary) for an average of 41.4 months. We found that 15 patients (42.9%) had been misdiagnosed of synovitis, perthes disease, osteomyelitis, intra-articular infection, joint tuberculosis and hip impingement syndrome, whose average time from symptoms to diagnosis were 6.3 months. Postoperative pain score and joint function score improved significantly compared with preoperative, and complications were rare.

Conclusion

Open surgical resection constitutes an effective treatment for proximal femoral OO by accurately and completely removing the nidus. Wrong choice of examination, and the complexity and diversity of clinical manifestations constitutes the main reasons for the misdiagnosis of proximal femoral OO.

Comparison of arthroscopy versus percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation for the management of intra- and juxta-articular elbow osteoid osteoma: case series and a literature review

BACKGROUND

Today, intra-articular and juxta-articular osteoid osteomas are treated with arthroscopy and radiofrequency thermal ablation. However, for the case of an elbow joint, arguments are made for the use of a minimally invasive technique to be the optimal choice. This study aims to analyse our experiences of arthroscopically treated elbow osteoid osteomas and to compare it with the published results of both techniques.

METHODS

The retrospective study analyses the patients who underwent elbow arthroscopy ablation of an elbow osteoid osteoma at a single institution from January 2014 until March 2020. Clinical and diagnostic features, success and treatment failure rates, complications and tumour recurrence rates were all compared to 13 studies of intra-articular elbow osteoid osteoma arthroscopic ablation and 15 studies involving radiofrequency thermal ablation of intra-articular osteoid osteoma within different joints.

RESULTS

Four males and two females, with a mean age of 19.3 years, were encompassed. All the patients had immediate postoperative pain relief and improved range of motion. No tumour recurrences were observed during a median of 21.7 months. The literature review yielded 86.4% success rate, 68.2% successful biopsies, one minor complication and no recurrences following the arthroscopic ablation of an elbow osteoid osteoma; while radiofrequency thermal ablation of an intra-articular elbow osteoid osteoma yielded 96.3% success rate, 33.3% successful biopsies, no complications and 3.7% recurrence rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results are consistent with the published literature proving that arthroscopic ablation is an efficient method with low treatment failure rates and no recurrences in treating intra- and juxta-articular elbow osteoid osteomas. Advantages of arthroscopic ablation stem from the ability to visualise and safely deal with the lesion and the joint's reactive changes resulting in high biopsy rates, no recurrences and better postoperative elbow's range of motion. Still, the technique selection should be personalised considering the medical expertise of every institution.

Finite Element Analysis Could Predict and Prevent a Pathological Femoral Shaft Fracture after En Bloc Resection of a Large Osteoid Osteoma

Osteoid osteoma is a benign tumor. Approximately 20% of these tumors are located in the femur. The tumor primarily occurs in children and is treated by surgical excision or radiofrequency ablation. Recently, bone-tumor resection using three-dimensional (3D) intraoperative imaging with an O-arm in combination with a navigation system has been reported to be effective. However, there is a risk of postoperative fracture because of the weakening of the bone after drilling for tumor resection. A 12-year-old Japanese girl presented with an osteoid osteoma in the left femoral shaft, which resulted in a fracture after en bloc resection and artificial bone grafting using a 3D image-guided (O-arm) assisted navigation system. Orthopedic oncologists should be aware of the risk of fracture. Moreover, they should consider the mechanical risk prediction of bone fracture using finite element analysis prior to treatment.