Kinematic comparison between asymmetrical and symmetrical polyethylene inserts during deep knee bend activity

Symmetric versus asymmetric tibial components: A systematic review of comparative studies

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a widely performed procedure that significantly enhances patients' quality of life by reducing pain and improving daily function. While the traditional tibial plate design used in TKA has been symmetrical, there has been a recent trend towards using asymmetrical designs. Our study aimed to compare symmetrical and asymmetrical tibial designs, focusing on outcomes related to overhang, malrotation, and tibial coverage.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was carried out up to January 22nd, 2024, to identify comparative studies on symmetrical and asymmetrical designs, as well as those reporting postoperative functional and clinical outcomes. The risk of bias in the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

This systematic review included 587 patients from seven comparative studies that met the inclusion criteria. Our findings indicate that asymmetrical tibial components generally provided better outcomes in terms of tibial coverage, malrotation, and overhang. Asymmetrical designs provided greater tibial coverage and reduced posterolateral overhang compared to symmetrical designs, which is essential for minimizing complications like soft tissue irritation and patellar maltracking. Additionally, asymmetrical components were associated with less severe tibial malrotation.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review showed that asymmetrical tibial implants offer better tibial coverage, with less overhang and fewer rotational issues compared to symmetrical implants. As a result, asymmetrical designs in TKA may lower complication rates, enhance patient satisfaction, and improve quality of life post-surgery.

A new gap balancing technique with functional alignment in total knee arthroplasty using the MAKO robotic arm system: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND

Gap tension is an important factor influencing the clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Traditional mechanical alignment (MA) places importance on neutral alignment and often requires additional soft tissue releases, which may be related to patient dissatisfaction. Conversely, the functional alignment requires less soft tissue release to achieve gap balance. Conventional gap tension instruments present several shortcomings in practice. The aim of this study is to introduce a new gap balancing technique with FA using the modified spacer-based gap tool and the MAKO robotic arm system.

METHODS

A total of 22 consecutive patients underwent primary TKA using the MAKO robotic arm system. The gap tension was assessed and adjusted with the modified spacer-based gap tool during the operation. Patient satisfaction was evaluated post-operatively with a 5-point Likert scale. Clinical outcomes including lower limb alignment, Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) were recorded before surgery, 3 months and 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

The range of motion (ROM) was significantly increased (p < 0.001) and no patients presented flexion contracture after the surgery. KSS and WOMAC score were significantly improved at 3 months and 1 year follow-up (p < 0.001 for all). During the surgery, the adjusted tibial cut showed more varus than planned and the adjusted femoral cut presented more external rotation than planned (p < 0.05 for both). The final hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was also more varus than planned (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This kind of spacer-based gap balancing technique accompanied with the MAKO robotic arm system could promise controlled lower limb alignment and improved functional outcomes after TKA.

Can Asymmetry in Total Knee Arthroplasty Design Lead to More Normal-Like Postoperative Kinematics? A Multi-Implant Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Few studies have evaluated the effects of symmetrical versus asymmetrical implant designs, more specifically the femoral condyles, trochlear groove, joint line, and bearing surfaces. The objective of this study was to investigate multiple posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs influencing factors related to TKA asymmetry, and to investigate whether asymmetry can improve postoperative knee kinematics.

METHODS

In vivo tibio-femoral kinematics for 99 subjects was evaluated in this retrospective study. Overall, 10 subjects had a nonimplanted, normal knee, and 89 subjects had 1 of 3 PCR TKAs with varying degrees of asymmetry within their femoral and tibial components (PCR #1 = 30, PCR #2 = 29, PCR #3 = 30). All TKAs were implanted by the same surgeon and were analyzed using fluoroscopy during a deep knee bend.

RESULTS

At full extension, all 3 PCR TKAs experienced a more posteriorized position of the femoral condyles compared to the normal knee, with the 2 asymmetrical PCR TKAs experiencing more anteriorization compared to the third, symmetrical PCR TKA. Both the normal knee and the PCR TKA with greatest amount of asymmetry experienced statistically more posterior femoral rollback of the lateral condyle than the other 2 PCR TKAs. The PCR TKA with greater asymmetry also experienced statistically greater range of motion than the other 2 PCR TKAs.

CONCLUSIONS

With increasing flexion, the design with the most asymmetry also experienced the most posterior femoral rollback, axial rotation, and greatest range of motion. The results in this study seem to suggest that the inclusion of asymmetry in a TKA could be beneficial for achieving more normal-like kinematics and greater weight-bearing knee flexion.

Intraoperative Kinematics in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Different Inserts

We analyzed the intraoperative kinematics of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a navigation system to investigate the influence of different inserts on kinematics. This was a retrospective observational study. The Vanguard individualized design (33 patients, 33 knees) XP and anterior-stabilized (AS) inserts were used in TKA for osteoarthritis. Kinematic data were intraoperatively recorded. The range of motion, tibiofemoral rotational angle, anteroposterior translation of the femur, and varus-valgus laxity were compared between the two inserts (XP vs. AS). There was no significant difference in the range of motion (extension: XP, 3.7° ± 3.3° vs. AS, 3.8° ± 3.3°, p = 0.84; flexion: XP, 138.1° ± 10.2° vs. AS, 139.0° ± 13.3°, p = 0.73). With the AS insert, the tibia was gradually internally rotated as the knee was flexed. At maximum extension, the internal rotation was smallest with AS (XP 6.5° ± 4.0° vs. AS 5.1° ± 3.4°, p = 0.022), which was also associated with smaller anterior femoral translation (maximum extension: XP, 14.1 ± 4.8 mm vs. AS, 11.3 ± 4.7 mm, p = 0.00036; 30°: XP, 23.7 ± 5.6 mm vs. AS, 20.7 ± 5.1 mm, p = 0.000033; 45°: XP, 24.4 ± 4.9 mm vs. AS, 23.2 ± 4.5 mm, p = 0.0038). The AS was associated with a lower varus-valgus laxity (30° XP 4.1° ± 3.4 vs. AS 3.3° ± 2.7°, p = 0.036; 60°: XP, 3.2° ± 3.0° vs. AS, 2.4° ± 3.3°, p = 0.0089). The AS insert facilitated sequential tibiofemoral rotation with varus-valgus stability in mid-flexion without restricting the range of motion.