Safety of active auditory implants in magnetic resonance imaging

Feasibility and limitations of head MRI in patients with cochlear implants

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear implants (CIs) were noncompatible with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) initially; however, recently, implants have become available that are compatible with MRI without the need for magnet removal or bandage fixation. The images produced by MRI scans are sometimes deteriorated by artifacts and are not clinically useful. In this study, we discussed the size differences of such artifacts with respect to the imaging modality and sequences with their clinical validity.

METHODS

We performed a head MRI, using a head bandage and without magnet removal in five patients who underwent cochlear implantation at our department and analyzed the MRI findings.

RESULTS

Without magnet removal, diffusion-weighted images and T2 star-weighted images had larger artifacts and less useful images. T1-weighted images, T2-weighted images (T2WIs), T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR) images, and heavy T2WIs could evaluate the unimplanted side and middle of the head but had limited applicability on the CI side.

CONCLUSION

The characteristic features of MRI scan images vary with the method used as well as with the sequence, suggesting that the choice of MRI is largely determined on the basis of clinical feasibility and the requirement. Accordingly, we need to judge well in advance of imaging whether the images would be clinically relevant.

A global survey of healthcare professionals undertaking MRI of patients with cochlear implants: a heterogeneity of practice and opinions

OBJECTIVE

To capture practice and opinions around the current clinical use of MRI in patients with cochlear implants (CIs), and to characterise patient progression from referral to image reporting.

METHODS

An online survey recruited 237 healthcare professionals between 9 December 2019 and 9 September 2020. Descriptive statistics and informal thematic analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Respondents estimated that approximately 75% of CI users referred for an MRI proceeded to image acquisition, of which ~70% of cases comprised image acquisition on the head and the remaining cases on another area. They estimated that the proportion of these images that were usable was 93 and 99%, respectively. Confidence in most processes was high, with at least two-thirds of respondents reporting to be very or somewhat confident in obtaining consent and acquiring images. Conversely, fewer than half the respondents had the same confidence when splinting and bandaging the implant and troubleshooting any issues arising. Patient safety was rated of paramount importance, with patient comfort a clear second and image quality third.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the need for consistent publication of clear, succinct, and standardised operating procedures for scanning patients with CIs and the requirement for regular training of radiographic and radiological healthcare professionals to address the heterogeneity of devices available.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

There is a need to improve the communication to radiography and radiology personnel regarding the nature of CIs, the heterogeneity of devices in existence, and the key differences between them. CI users risk being underserved by diagnostic medical imaging.

Implants with Sensing Capabilities

Because of the aging human population and increased numbers of surgical procedures being performed, there is a growing number of biomedical devices being implanted each year. Although the benefits of implants are significant, there are risks to having foreign materials in the body that may lead to complications that may remain undetectable until a time at which the damage done becomes irreversible. To address this challenge, advances in implantable sensors may enable early detection of even minor changes in the implants or the surrounding tissues and provide early cues for intervention. Therefore, integrating sensors with implants will enable real-time monitoring and lead to improvements in implant function. Sensor integration has been mostly applied to cardiovascular, neural, and orthopedic implants, and advances in combined implant-sensor devices have been significant, yet there are needs still to be addressed. Sensor-integrating implants are still in their infancy; however, some have already made it to the clinic. With an interdisciplinary approach, these sensor-integrating devices will become more efficient, providing clear paths to clinical translation in the future.

A Miniature, Fiber-Optic Vibrometer for Measuring Unintended Acoustic Output of Active Hearing Implants during Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Making use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnostics on patients with implanted medical devices requires caution due to mutual interactions between the device and the electromagnetic fields used by the scanner that can cause a number of adverse events. The presented study offers a novel test method to quantify the risk of unintended output of acoustically stimulating hearing implants. The design and operating principle of an all-optical, MRI safe vibrometer is outlined, followed by an experimental verification of a prototype. Results obtained in an MRI environment indicate that the system can detect peak displacements down to 8 pm for audible frequencies. Feasibility testing was performed with an active middle ear implant that was exposed to several pulse sequences in a 1.5 Tesla MRI environment. Magnetic field induced actuator vibrations, measured during scanning, turned out to be equivalent to estimated sound pressure levels between 25 and 85 dB SPL, depending on the signal frequency. These sound pressure levels are situated well below ambient sound pressure levels generated by the MRI scanning process. The presented case study therefore indicates a limited risk of audible unintended output for the examined hearing implant during MRI.