Rehabilitation for Subacromial Impingement Starts at the Scapula

Individualized Versus General Exercise Therapy in People With Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of individualized exercises based on movement fault (MF) control on pain intensity, and disability in subjects with chronic subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS).

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Rehabilitation clinics.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-eight participants with chronic SAPS (mean [SD] age, 52.23 (8.47); 60 % women).

INTERVENTIONS

The participants were randomly allocated to 1 of the intervention groups (individualized exercises based on MFs control test designed to target specific movement faults) or the control group (commonly prescribed general scapular stabilization exercises). Both groups received exercise sessions twice a week for 4 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were pain intensity at rest (PR) and during arm raising (PAR) using a visual analog scale. Disability was assessed as a key secondary outcome, including the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).

RESULTS

Following completion of all exercise sessions, PAR was significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group (mean, 9.17; 95% confidence interval; 0.31-18.03; P=.04), with a large effect size (0.68). The reduction of PAR remained significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group after 4 months of follow-up (mean, 18.29; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 9.09-27.48; P<.00) with a large effect size (1.27). Disability significantly decreased at 2-month (mean, 14.58, P=.002 on SPADI index; mean, 10.26, P=.006 on DASH index) and 4-month (mean, 19.85, P<.001 on SPADI index; mean, 12.09, P=.001 on DASH index) follow-ups in the intervention group compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

Individualized exercises based on MFs control of the shoulder region was accompanied by decreased PAR and disability in subjects with SAPS.

Effect of Mobilization With Movement on the Glenohumeral Joint Positional Fault in Subacromial Impingement

Introduction Subacromial impingement (SAI) is a prevalent shoulder condition characterized by mechanical compression within the subacromial region. It presents with symptoms like shoulder pain and restricted motion, impacting a significant portion of the population. Neer's classification delineates three progressive stages of SAI, ranging from bursa edema to chronic rotator cuff tears. The etiology involves intrinsic and extrinsic factors, leading to altered kinematics and impingement. The study aims to determine the effect of mobilization with movement (MWM) on the glenohumeral joint positional fault in patients with SAI. Materials and methods The study comprised 80 participants diagnosed with SAI, selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and randomly divided into two groups, each consisting of 40 subjects. Group A received conventional therapy, while Group B received MWM in addition to conventional therapy. Treatment sessions, lasting 45 minutes, were administered five times weekly for four weeks. Pre- and post-treatment assessments included the visual analog scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM), acromion humeral distance (AHD), and acromion tuberosity index (ATI). Results The results demonstrated that there was an extremely significant improvement in VAS, shoulder ROM, and ADH in both groups, with a p-value of 0.0001, except for the ATI, which showed significant improvement in Group B with a p-value of 0.0001 compared to Group A. Conclusions Based on statistical analysis, the study found that MWM significantly improved joint positioning fault and has been beneficial in reducing pain and improving ROM.

Effect of scapular stabilization exercise program in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a systematic review

Scapular stabilization approaches have been a mainstay of therapeutic training programs in the recent past for patients with subacromial im-pingement syndrome, whereas its contributions solely in the clinical outcome of reducing shoulder pain and disability are largely unclear. This systematic review aims to evaluate and summarize the best evi-dence regarding the role of scapular stabilization interventions in allevi-ating shoulder dysfunction among subjects with subacromial impinge-ment syndrome. Six reviewers involved in this systematic review. Liter-ature was retrieved systematically through searching 5 electronic data-bases (PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Google Scholar). Articles published from the year 2010 up to and including 2019 were in-cluded. The literature search included clinical trials those intervened subjects with scapular exercises or scapular stabilization exercises or scapular rehabilitation, as an intervention for subacromial impingement syndrome. Seven studies, totaling 228 participants were included in this systematic review. Articles included in this review were graded ac-cording to Lloyd-Smith hierarchy of evidence scale and critically ap-praised with a tool developed by National, Heart, Lung and Blood Insti-tute (United States), named as quality assessment of controlled inter-vention studies tool. There was a significant effect on the scapular sta-bilization exercise program on improving pain and disability among sub-jects with subacromial impingement syndrome. This systematic review provides sufficient evidence to suggest that scapular stabilization exer-cises offers effectiveness in reducing pain and disability among sub-jects with subacromial impingement syndrome. However, more trials with larger sample are needed to provide a more definitive evidence on the clinical outcomes of scapular stabilization exercises among pa-tients with impingement.

Specific or general exercise strategy for subacromial impingement syndrome-does it matter? A systematic literature review and meta analysis

BACKGROUND

Exercise is frequently suggested as a treatment option for patients presenting with symptoms of subacromial impingement syndrome. Some would argue implementing a specific exercise strategy with special focus on correction of kinematic deficits would be superior to general exercise strategy. There is however a lack of evidence comparing such exercise strategies to determine which is the most effective in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome. The aim of this review is to evaluate whether implementing specific exercise strategies involving resistive exercises are more effective than a general exercise strategy for the treatment of patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials were identified through an electronic search on PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science and PEDro. In addition, article reference lists and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Studies were considered eligible if they included interventions with resistive specific exercises as compared to general resistance exercise. Four reviewers assessed risk of bias and methodological quality guided by Cochrane recommendations. Results were synthesised qualitatively or quantitatively, where appropriate.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials were included with 231 participants who experienced symptoms of subacromial impingement syndrome. Four studies evaluated the effectiveness of specific scapular exercise strategy and two studies evaluated the effectiveness of specific proprioceptive strategy. Five studies were of moderate quality and one study was of low quality. No consistent statistical significant differences in outcomes between treatment groups were reported in the studies. Standardized mean difference (SMD) for pain was SMD -0.19 (95% CI -0.61, 0.22) and SMD 0.30 (95% CI -0.16, 0.76) for function.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to support or refute the effectiveness of specific resistive exercise strategies in the rehabilitation of subacromial impingement syndrome. More high quality research is needed to accurately assess this. This review provides suggestions on how to improve the methodological design of future studies in this area.