Assessing Aδ Fiber Function With Lidocaine Using Intraepidermal Electrical Stimulation

Does intra-epidermal electrical stimulation activate mechano- and thermo-nociceptors? A discrimination approach

BACKGROUND

Objective laboratory tests are needed to diagnose lesions within the nociceptive system accurately. One approach is assessing pain-related evoked potentials (PREPs) in response to intra-epidermal electrical stimulation (IES). In this context, peripheral characterization of the specificity of nociceptor activation with IES is needed.

NEW METHOD

As IES directly depolarizes free nerve endings, it might allow a more comprehensive nociceptor activation than classical contact heat stimulation. Hence, this study aimed to investigate whether mechano-nociceptors are activated by IES. To test this hypothesis, a heat pain model was used to assess whether IES would show comparable pain hypersensitivity in the experimentally-induced area of secondary mechanical hyperalgesia (SMH), as known for pinprick but not for contact heat stimuli. Pain ratings and PREPs were recorded in response to 15 contact heat and pinprick stimuli as well as IES applied to the volar forearm before (PRE) and after (POST) a heat pain model inducing an area of SMH (EXP) or a control model (CTRL).

RESULTS AND COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS

All 24 participants (25.5 ± 4.7 y, 10 f/14 m) presented with SMH in POST-EXP condition. Pain ratings were significantly increased in EXP versus CTRL for IES (p = 0.016) and pinprick (p = 0.006) but not for contact heat (p = 0.683). PREP NP-amplitude between EXP and CTRL was only increased in response to pinprick (p = 0.027), but not to IES (p = 0.547) and contact heat stimuli (p = 0.070).

CONCLUSIONS

Psychophysical assessments suggest mechano-nociceptor activation by IES, while PREPs do not support this assumption, indicating the predominant activation of thermo-nociceptors by IES.

Assessing the Effects of the Topical Application of L-Menthol on Pain-Related Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials Using Intra-Epidermal Stimulation

L-menthol is known to activate transient receptor potential melastatin 8 (TRPM8) and induce analgesia to thermal stimuli. However, since thermal stimulation leads to the interaction among the other TRP channels, it was unclear whether L-menthol causes analgesia to stimuli other than thermal stimuli. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether activating TRPM8 via topical application of 10% menthol solution attenuates pain-related somatosensory-evoked potentials (pSEPs) and affects numerical rating scale (NRS) score using intra-epidermal electrical stimulation (IES). We applied 10% L-menthol or control solution on the dorsum of the right hand of 25 healthy participants. The pSEP and NRS, elicited by IES, and sensory threshold were measured before and after each solution was applied. The results showed that the topical application of 10% L-menthol solution significantly reduced N2-P2 amplitude in pSEPs compared with the control solution. Moreover, the N2 latency was significantly prolonged upon the topical application of L-menthol solution. NRS scores were similar under both conditions. These results suggest that topical application of L-menthol does not alter subjective sensation induced using IES, although it may attenuate afferent signals at free nerve endings even with stimuli that do not directly activate TRP channels.

Optimized Electrical Stimulation of C-Nociceptors in Humans Based on the Chronaxie of Porcine C-Fibers

Classically, to electrically excite C-nociceptors, rectangular pulses are used with a duration close to the estimated chronaxie of C-fibres (about 2 ms). Recent results using slow depolarizing stimuli suggest longer chronaxies. We therefore set out to optimize C-fiber stimulation based on recordings of single C-nociceptors in-vivo and C-fiber compound-action-potentials (C-CAP) ex-vivo using half-sine shaped stimuli of durations between 1 and 250ms. Single fiber (n = 45) recording in pigs revealed high chronaxie values for C-touch fibers (15.8 ms), polymodal- (14.2 ms) and silent-nociceptors (16.8 ms). Activation thresholds decreased 2 to 3-fold in all fibre classes when increasing the duration of half-sine pulses from 1 to 25 ms (P < .05). C-CAPs strength-duration curves of the pig saphenous nerve (n = 7) showed the highest sensitivity for half-sine durations between 10 and 25 ms. Half-maximum currents for C-CAPS were reduced 3-fold compared to rectangular pulses (P < .01) whereas the opposite was found for A-fiber compound action potentials. Psychophysics in humans (n = 23) revealed that half-sine stimulus durations >10 ms reduced detection thresholds, pain thresholds, and stimulus current amplitudes required to generate a pain rating of 3 on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) as compared to 1 ms rectangular pulses (P < 0.05). Increasing the duration from 1 to 25 ms led to a 4-fold amplitude reduction for pain-thresholds and stimuli caused an axon-reflex flare. Excitability of single polymodal nociceptors in animals paralleled human psychophysics and we conclude optimized half-sine pulses facilitate C-nociceptor activation. PERSPECTIVE: Electrical stimulation with longer lasting half-sine wave pulses preferentially activates C-nociceptors and changes in the strength duration curve may identify nociceptor hyperexcitability in patients with neuropathic pain.

Selective stimulation of nociceptive small fibers during intraepidermal electrical stimulation: Experiment and computational analysis

Electrical stimulation of skin nociceptors is gaining attention in pain research and peripheral neuropathy diagnosis. However, the optimal parameters for selective stimulation are still difficult to determine because they require simultaneous characterization of the electrical response of small fibers (Aδ- and C-fibers). In this study, we measured the in vivo electrical threshold responses of small fibers to train-pulse stimulation in humans for the first time. We also examined selective stimulation via a computational model, which combines electrical analysis, and terminal fiber and synaptic models, including the first cutaneous pain C-fiber model. Selective stimulation of small fibers is performed by injecting train-pulse stimulation via coaxial electrodes with an intraepidermal needle tip at varying pulse counts and frequencies. The activation Aδ- or C-fibers was discriminated from the differences in reaction time. Aδ-fiber elicited a pinpricking sensation with a mean reaction time of 0.522 s, and C-fiber elicited a tingling sensation or slight burning itch with a mean reaction time of 1.243 s. The implemented multiscale electrical model investigates synaptic effects while considering stimulation waveform characteristics. Experimental results showed that perception thresholds decreased with the number of consecutive pulses and frequency up to convergence (five pulses or 70 Hz) during the selective stimulation of Aδ- and C-fibers. Considering the synaptic properties, the optimal stimulus conditions for selective stimulation of Aδ- vs. C-fibers were train of at least four pulses and a frequency of 40-70 Hz at a pulse width of 1 ms. The experimental results were modeled with high fidelity by incorporating temporal synaptic effects into the computational model. Numerical analysis revealed terminal axon thickness to be the most important biophysical factor affecting threshold variability. The computational model can be used to estimate perception thresholds while understanding the mechanisms underlying the selective stimulation of small fibers. The parameters derived here are important in exploring selective stimulation between Aδ- and C-fibers for diagnosing neuropathies.

Intra-epidermal evoked potentials: A promising tool for spinal disorders?

OBJECTIVES

To test the robustness and signal-to-noise ratio of pain-related evoked potentials following intra-epidermal electrical stimulation (IES) compared to contact heat stimulation in healthy controls, and to explore the feasibility and potential added value of IES in the diagnosis of spinal disorders.

METHODS

Pain-related evoked potentials induced by IES (custom-made, non-invasive, concentric triple pin electrode with steel pins protruding 1 mm from the anode, triangularly separated by 7-10 mm respectively) and contact heat stimulation were compared in 30 healthy subjects. Stimuli were applied to four different body sites. Two IES intensities, i.e., high (individually adapted to contact heat painfulness) and low (1.5 times pain threshold), were used. Additionally, a 40-year-old patient with unilateral dissociated sensory loss due to a multi-segmental syringohydromyelia was assessed comparing IES and contact heat stimulation.

RESULTS

Both IES and contact heat stimulation led to robust pain-related evoked potentials recorded in all healthy subjects. Low intensity IES evoked potentials (14.1-38.0 µV) had similar amplitudes as contact heat evoked potentials (11.8-32.3 µV), while pain ratings on the numeric rating scale were lower for IES (0.8-2.5, compared to 1.5-3.9 for contact heat stimulation). High intensity IES led to evoked potentials with higher signal-to-noise ratio than low intensity IES and contact heat stimulation. The patient case showed impaired pain-related evoked potentials in segments with hypoalgesia for both IES modes. IES evoked potentials were preserved, with delayed latencies, while contact heat evoked potentials were abolished.

CONCLUSION

IES evoked robust pain-related cortical potentials, while being less painful in healthy controls. The improved signal-to-noise ratio supports the use of IES for objective segmental testing of nociceptive processing. This was highlighted in a spinal syndrome case, where IES as well as contact heat stimulation reliably detected impaired segmental nociception.

Event-related potentials evoked by skin puncture reflect activation of Aβ fibers: comparison with intraepidermal and transcutaneous electrical stimulations

Background

Recently, event-related potentials (ERPs) evoked by skin puncture, commonly used for blood sampling, have received attention as a pain assessment tool in neonates. However, their latency appears to be far shorter than the latency of ERPs evoked by intraepidermal electrical stimulation (IES), which selectively activates nociceptive Aδ and C fibers. To clarify this important issue, we examined whether ERPs evoked by skin puncture appropriately reflect central nociceptive processing, as is the case with IES.

Methods

In Experiment 1, we recorded evoked potentials to the click sound produced by a lance device (click-only), lance stimulation with the click sound (click+lance), or lance stimulation with white noise (WN+lance) in eight healthy adults to investigate the effect of the click sound on the ERP evoked by skin puncture. In Experiment 2, we tested 18 heathy adults and recorded evoked potentials to shallow lance stimulation (SL) with a blade that did not reach the dermis (0.1 mm insertion depth); normal lance stimulation (CL) (1 mm depth); transcutaneous electrical stimulation (ES), which mainly activates Aβ fibers; and IES, which selectively activates Aδ fibers when low stimulation current intensities are applied. White noise was continuously presented during the experiments. The stimulations were applied to the hand dorsum. In the SL, the lance device did not touch the skin and the blade was inserted to a depth of 0.1 mm into the epidermis, where the free nerve endings of Aδ fibers are located, which minimized the tactile sensation caused by the device touching the skin and the activation of Aβ fibers by the blade reaching the dermis. In the CL, as in clinical use, the lance device touched the skin and the blade reached a depth of 1 mm from the skin surface, i.e., the depth of the dermis at which the Aβ fibers are located.

Results

The ERP N2 latencies for click-only (122 ± 2.9 ms) and click+lance (121 ± 6.5 ms) were significantly shorter than that for WN+lance (154 ± 7.1 ms). The ERP P2 latency for click-only (191 ± 11.3 ms) was significantly shorter than those for click+lance (249 ± 18.6 ms) and WN+lance (253 ± 11.2 ms). This suggests that the click sound shortens the N2 latency of the ERP evoked by skin puncture. The ERP N2 latencies for SL, CL, ES, and IES were 146 ± 8.3, 149 ± 9.9, 148 ± 13.1, and 197 ± 21.2 ms, respectively. The ERP P2 latencies were 250 ± 18.2, 251 ± 14.1, 237 ± 26.3, and 294 ± 30.0 ms, respectively. The ERP latency for SL was significantly shorter than that for IES and was similar to that for ES. This suggests that the penetration force generated by the blade of the lance device activates the Aβ fibers, consequently shortening the ERP latency.

Conclusions

Lance ERP may reflect the activation of Aβ fibers rather than Aδ fibers. A pain index that correctly and reliably reflects nociceptive processing must be developed to improve pain assessment and management in neonates.

Can Event-Related Potentials Evoked by Heel Lance Assess Pain Processing in Neonates? A Systematic Review

To clarify the possibility of event-related potential (ERP) evoked by heel lance in neonates as an index of pain assessment, knowledge acquired by and problems of the methods used in studies on ERP evoked by heel lance in neonates were systematically reviewed, including knowledge about Aδ and C fibers responding to noxious stimuli and Aβ fibers responding to non-noxious stimuli. Of the 863 reports searched, 19 were selected for the final analysis. The following points were identified as problems for ERP evoked by heel lance in neonates to serve as a pain assessment index: (1) It is possible that the ERP evoked by heel lance reflected the activation of Aβ fibers responding to non-noxious stimuli and not the activation of Aδ or C fibers responding to noxious stimulation; (2) Sample size calculation was presented in few studies, and the number of stimulation trials to obtain an averaged ERP was small. Accordingly, to establish ERP evoked by heel lance as a pain assessment in neonates, it is necessary to perform a study to clarify ERP evoked by Aδ- and C-fiber stimulations accompanied by heel lance in neonates.

Simultaneous tracking of psychophysical detection thresholds and evoked potentials to study nociceptive processing

Measuring altered nociceptive processing involved in chronic pain is difficult due to a lack of objective methods. Potential methods to characterize human nociceptive processing involve measuring neurophysiological activity and psychophysical responses to well-defined stimuli. To reliably measure neurophysiological activity in response to nociceptive stimulation using EEG, synchronized activation of nerve fibers and a large number of stimuli are required. On the other hand, to reliably measure psychophysical detection thresholds, selection of stimulus amplitudes around the detection threshold and many stimulus-response pairs are required. Combining the two techniques helps in quantifying the properties of nociceptive processing related to detected and non-detected stimuli around the detection threshold.The two techniques were combined in an experiment including 20 healthy participants to study the effect of intra-epidermal electrical stimulus properties (i.e. amplitude, single- or double-pulse and trial number) on the detection thresholds and vertex potentials. Generalized mixed regression and linear mixed regression were used to quantify the psychophysical detection probability and neurophysiological EEG responses, respectively.It was shown that the detection probability is significantly modulated by the stimulus amplitude, trial number, and the interaction between stimulus type and amplitude. Furthermore, EEG responses were significantly modulated by stimulus detection and trial number. Hence, we successfully demonstrated the possibility to simultaneously obtain information on psychophysical and neurophysiological properties of nociceptive processing. These results warrant further investigation of the potential of this method to observe altered nociceptive processing.

A test-retest reliability study of assessing small cutaneous fibers by measuring current perception threshold with pin electrodes

Background

The quantitative measurement of current perception threshold (CPT) has been used as a method to assess the function of nerve fibers in neuropathy diseases. The aim of this study was to assess the test-retest reliability measuring CPT using the circular pin electrodes for assessing the function of cutaneous thin nerve fibers.

Methods

CPT measurement was repeated on two separate days with at least one-week interval in 55 volunteers. Superficial blood flow (SBF) and skin temperature (ST) were measured on the skin in an around area concentric to the circular pin electrodes after the process of finding CPTs. The coefficient of variation (CV) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. The correlation between each two of CPT, SBF increment and ST increment was analyzed.

Results

No significant differences were found for CPT, SBF and ST between two sessions. SBF was found to be significantly increased after the process of finding CPT. CPT values of males were found to be higher than females. SBF increment was found to be positively correlated with ST increment. The ICC values for CPT, SBF and ST were 0.595, 0.852 and 0.728, respectively. The CV values for CPT, SBF and ST were 25.53%, 12.59% and 1.94%, respectively.

Conclusions

The reliability of CPT measurement using circular pin electrodes is fair, and need consistence of measurements in longitudinal studies.

Pain-autonomic interaction: A surrogate marker of central sensitization

BACKGROUND

Central sensitization represents a key pathophysiological mechanism underlying the development of neuropathic pain, often manifested clinically as mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia. Adopting a mechanism-based treatment approach relies highly on the ability to assess the presence of central sensitization. The aim of the study was to investigate potential pain-autonomic readouts to operationalize experimentally induced central sensitization in the area of secondary hyperalgesia.

METHODS

Pinprick evoked potentials (PEPs) and sympathetic skin responses (SSRs) were recorded in 20 healthy individuals. Three blocks of PEP and SSR recordings were performed before and after heat-induced secondary hyperalgesia. All measurements were also performed before and after a control condition. Multivariate analyses were performed using linear mixed-effect regression models to examine the effect of experimentally induced central sensitization on PEP and SSR parameters (i.e. amplitudes, latencies and habituation) and on pinprick pain ratings.

RESULTS

The noxious heat stimulation induced robust mechanical hyperalgesia with a significant increase in PEP and SSR amplitudes (p < 0.001) in the area of secondary hyperalgesia. Furthermore, PEP and SSR habituation were reduced (p < 0.001) after experimentally induced central sensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate that combined recordings of PEPs and SSRs are sensitive to objectify experimentally induced central sensitization and may have a great potential to reveal its presence in clinical pain conditions. Corroborating current pain phenotyping with pain-autonomic markers has the potential to unravel central sensitization along the nociceptive neuraxis and might provide a framework for mechanistically founded therapies.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings provide evidence that combined recordings of sympathetic skin responses (SSRs) and pinprick evoked potentials (PEPs) might be able to unmask central sensitization induced through a well-established experimental pain model in healthy individuals. As such, these novel readouts of central sensitization might attain new insights towards complementing clinical pain phenotyping.

Length-dependent truncal Aδ-fiber dysfunction in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis: An intra-epidermal electrical stimulation study

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate Aδ-fiber dysfunction at the trunk in patients with hereditary transthyretin (ATTRm) amyloidosis using intra-epidermal electrical stimulation (IES).

METHODS

In 16 patients with ATTRm amyloidosis and 18 healthy subjects, sensory thresholds using IES and cooling detection thresholds using the Computer-Aided Sensory Evaluation (CASE IV) system, were assessed to investigate Aδ-fiber functions at the Th10 level of the anterior, lateral, and posterior trunk. Furthermore, evoked potentials (EPs) following electrical stimulation using IES at the anterior and posterior trunk were evaluated.

RESULTS

In patients with ATTRm amyloidosis, both IES and CASE IV sensory thresholds tended to be higher at the anterior trunk than at the lateral and posterior trunks. The amplitudes of EPs following electrical stimulation at the anterior trunk were lower than those at the posterior trunk. Aδ-fiber dysfunction at the anterior trunk was conspicuous in patients with more intense polyneuropathy at the limbs. In healthy subjects, there were no differences in both sensory thresholds and EP amplitudes among any examination sites. Sensory thresholds with IES and CASE IV were correlated.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation using IES demonstrated length-dependent Aδ-fiber dysfunction at the trunk in patients with ATTRm amyloidosis.

SIGNIFICANCE

IES may be a useful clinical tool for investigating Aδ-fiber dysfunction at various parts of the body in patients with neuropathy.

Clinical neurophysiology of pain

Clinical neurophysiologic investigation of pain pathways in humans is based on specific techniques and approaches, since conventional methods of nerve conduction studies and somatosensory evoked potentials do not explore these pathways. The proposed techniques use various types of painful stimuli (thermal, laser, mechanical, or electrical) and various types of assessments (measurement of sensory thresholds, study of nerve fiber excitability, or recording of electromyographic reflexes or cortical potentials). The two main tests used in clinical practice are quantitative sensory testing and pain-related evoked potentials (PREPs). In particular, PREPs offer the possibility of an objective assessment of nociceptive pathways. Three types of PREPs can be distinguished depending on the type of stimulation used to evoke pain: laser-evoked potentials, contact heat evoked potentials, and intraepidermal electrical stimulation evoked potentials (IEEPs). These three techniques investigate both small-diameter peripheral nociceptive afferents (mainly Aδ nerve fibers) and spinothalamic tracts without theoretically being able to differentiate the level of lesion in the case of abnormal results. In routine clinical practice, PREP recording is a reliable method of investigation for objectifying the existence of a peripheral or central lesion or loss of function concerning the nociceptive pathways, but not the existence of pain. Other methods, such as nerve fiber excitability studies using microneurography, more directly reflect the activities of nociceptive axons in response to provoked pain, but without detecting or quantifying the presence of spontaneous pain. These methods are more often used in research or experimental study design. Thus, it should be kept in mind that most of the results of neurophysiologic investigation performed in clinical practice assess small fiber or spinothalamic tract lesions rather than the neuronal mechanisms directly at the origin of pain and they do not provide objective quantification of pain.

Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation over the Primary Motor Cortex Induces Plastic Changes in Cortical Nociceptive Processing

Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) is a novel and inexpensive, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) technique. Here, we performed non-invasive modulation of intra-epidermal electrical stimulation-evoked potentials (IES-EPs) by applying tSMS or sham stimulation over the primary motor (M1) and somatosensory (S1) cortices in 18 healthy volunteers for 15 min. We recorded EPs after IES before, right after, and 10 min after tSMS. The IES-EP amplitude was significantly reduced immediately after tSMS over M1, whereas tSMS over S1 and sham stimulation did not affect the IES-EP amplitude. Thus, tSMS may affect cortical nociceptive processing. Although the results of intervention for experimental acute pain in healthy subjects cannot be directly translated into the clinical situation, tSMS may be a potentially useful NIBS method for managing chronic pain, in addition to standard of care treatments.

Elevated pain threshold in patients with asymptomatic diabetic neuropathy: an intraepidermal electrical stimulation study

INTRODUCTION

The loss of epidermal nerve fibers is regarded as an early pathological change in human diabetes. We investigated epidermal Aδ nerve fiber function by examining pain threshold by means of intraepidermal electrical stimulation (IES) in early diabetic neuropathy.

METHODS

We recruited 20 asymptomatic diabetic patients. Eighteen age-matched, healthy subjects served as controls. We placed the IES electrode onto the skin of the foot dorsum and delivered weak electrical stimulation. We defined pain threshold as the minimum electrical intensity at which a subject felt a pricking sensation.

RESULTS

The mean pain thresholds in the patient group were significantly higher (0.053 ± 0.036 mA; P < 0.01) than in the control group (0.027 ± 0.006 mA).

CONCLUSION

We confirmed that the pain threshold was elevated in early diabetic neuropathy. We conclude that the IES electrode is a useful tool to evaluate early diabetic polyneuropathy. Muscle Nerve 54: 146-149, 2016.

Effect of temporal stimulus properties on the nociceptive detection probability using intra-epidermal electrical stimulation

Chronic pain disorders can be initiated and maintained by malfunctioning of one or several mechanisms underlying the nociceptive function. Although several quantitative sensory testing methods exist to characterize the nociceptive function, it remains difficult to distinguish the contributions of individual mechanisms. Intra-epidermal electrical stimulation of nociceptive fibers allows defining stimuli with temporal properties within the timescale of these mechanisms. Here, we studied the effect of stimulus properties on the psychophysical detection probability. A psychophysical detection experiment was conducted including 30 healthy human participants. Participants were presented with electrical stimuli having various temporal properties. The pulse-width was varied for single pulse stimuli (either 420 or 840 μs), and the inter-pulse interval for double pulse stimuli (10, 50, or 100 ms). Generalized linear mixed models were used to obtain estimates of thresholds and slopes of the psychophysical function. The 840-μs single pulse resulted in a lower threshold and steeper slope of the psychophysical function than the 420-μs single pulse. Moreover, a double-pulse stimulus resulted in a lower threshold and steeper slope than single pulse stimuli. The slopes were similar between the double pulse stimuli, but thresholds slightly increased with increasing inter-pulse intervals. In the present study, it was demonstrated that varying the temporal properties of intra-epidermal electrical stimuli results in variations in nociceptive processing. The estimated thresholds and slopes corresponding to the selection of temporal properties suggest that contributions of peripheral and central nociceptive mechanisms can be reflected in psychophysical functions.

[Clinical application of pain-related evoked potentials]

Pain-related evoked potentials (PREPs) represent a novel method for the evaluation of peripheral and central nociceptive pathways, e.g. in the diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy (SFN) or after therapeutic interventions for headache. Compared to contact heat-evoked and laser-evoked potentials, recording of PREPs is less stressful for the subjects and technically less demanding. The clinical usefulness of PREPs has been described for SFN associated with diabetes, HIV and hepatitis C infections as well as in headache and facial pain disorders. They have also been evaluated after interventional methods, such as direct current stimulation (tDCS). The article reviews and discusses the advantages and pitfalls of this technique in the context of recent clinical studies as compared to other paradigms of peripheral electrical stimulation and delineates perspectives and possible indications.