Postoperative pain trajectories in chronic pain patients undergoing surgery: the effects of chronic opioid pharmacotherapy on acute pain

Acute pain trajectories in elderly patients with fragility hip fractures

BACKGROUND

Pain management for hospitalized elderly patients with fragility hip fractures (FHF) remains challenging. This study aims to distinguish acute pain trajectories in FHF patients that can inform personalized analgesia management.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study of patients aged 65 and older with FHF at a Level I trauma center. The primary outcome was daily average pain assessed for five days post-injury using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). We used group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) to distinguish acute pain trajectories. Then, factors and secondary outcomes (opioid use and hospital length of stay [LOS]) associated with more severe pain trajectories were identified.

RESULTS

We enrolled 100 consecutive patients with FHF between June 2022 and June 2023. We identified three distinct acute pain trajectories: minimal pain, subsiding pain, and persistent pain. Factors associated with more severe pain trajectories included higher initial pain on admission (OR 1.17, 95 % CI 1.02-1.36, P = 0.047), higher BMI (OR 1.15, 95 % CI 1.02-1.29, P = 0.021), and intertrochanteric fracture type (OR = 6.46, 95 % CI 1.49-27.98, P = 0.013). The persistent pain trajectory was significantly associated with 40 % more opioid use (P = 0.01) and a longer LOS (LOS ratio = 1.45, 95 % CI 1.21-1.74, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Acute pain in FHF patients can be classified into distinct trajectories, providing a basis for personalized pain management. More severe pain trajectories are associated with higher opioid use and longer length of hospital stay.

Impacts of opioid stewardship in surgical settings: a scoping review

ABSTRACT

Opioid stewardship programs have been implemented in many countries to reduce harms related to prescription opioid use. Yet, there is an evidence gap on the impact of these programs in surgical settings. This systematic scoping review aimed to examine the impact of opioid stewardship on opioid use and clinical outcomes, alongside assessing adherence, and barriers to its implementation in surgical settings. A systematic search strategy was developed and applied among 7 electronic databases for published literature. In total, 100 eligible articles were included in the review. Most studies showed that opioid stewardship reduced the quantity of opioid use (in 83/88 studies; 94%) and the number of days of opioid supplied (15/18; 83%). No effect was seen on the rate of opioid refills (34/44; 78%), postoperative pain scores (22/23; 96%), and length of hospital stay (12/15; 80%). The adherence rates ranged from 32% to 100%, with considerable heterogeneity in the indicators used to measure the quality use of opioids. Logistical issues, patients' demand for analgesics, clinicians' uncertainty regarding the efficacy of nonopioid analgesics, and a lack of role allocation were reported as major barriers to implementation. Opioid stewardship can improve the quality use of opioids without adversely affecting clinical outcomes. The variety of opioid stewardship types, measurement metrics, study designs, and different surgeries pose challenges in determining causal relationships. Future prospective studies using standardized approaches are needed to develop more robust evidence.

Single-shot interscalene block with liposomal bupivacaine vs. non-liposomal bupivacaine in shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Regional anesthesia is a valuable component of multimodal pain control in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and multiple interscalene block anesthetic options exist, including nonliposomal interscalene bupivacaine (NLIB) and liposomal interscalene bupivacaine (LIB). The purpose of this study was to compare pain control and opioid consumption within 48 hours postoperation in those undergoing TSA with either LIB or NLIB.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study at a single academic medical center including consecutive patients undergoing inpatient (>23-hour hospitalization) primary anatomic or reverse TSA from 2016 to 2020 who received either LIB or an NLIB for perioperative pain control. Perioperative patient outcomes were collected including pain levels and opioid usage, as well as 30- and 90-day emergency department (ED) visits or readmissions. The primary outcome was postoperative pain and opioid use.

RESULTS

Overall, 489 patients were included in this study (316 LIB and 173 NLIB). Pain scores at 3, 6, 12, and 48 hours postoperatively were not statistically significantly different (P > .05 for all). However, the LIB group had improved pain scores at 24 and 36 hours postoperation (P < .05 all). There was no difference in the incidence of severe postoperative pain, defined as a 9 or 10 numeric rating scale-11 score, between the 2 anesthesia groups after adjusting for preoperative pain and baseline opioid use (odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 0.57-2.74; P = .57). Overall, 99 of 316 patients receiving LIB (31.3%) did not require any postoperative opioids compared with 38 of 173 receiving NLIB (22.0%); however, this difference was not statistically significant after adjusting for prior opioid use and preoperative pain (P = .33). No statistically significant differences in postoperative total morphine equivalents or mean daily morphine equivalents consumed between the groups were found during their hospital stays (P > .05 for both). Finally, no significant differences were found in 30- and 90-day ED visits or readmission rates (all P > .05).

CONCLUSION

LIB and NLIB demonstrated differences in patient-reported pain scores at 24 and 36 hours postoperation, although these did not reach clinical significance. There were no statistically significant differences in opioid consumption during the hospital stay, including opioid use, total morphine equivalents, and daily mean morphine equivalents consumed during the hospital stay. Additionally, no differences were observed in 30- and 90-day ED visits or readmission rates.

Surgical Recovery Among Patients With Chronic Pain Undergoing Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery

IMPORTANCE

Limited data exist on postoperative recovery among patients with chronic pain undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgical procedures.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate if patients with versus without self-reported chronic pain experience different recovery after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

From September 2022 to May 2023, this prospective cohort study enrolled patients with and without chronic pain, who were undergoing vaginal or laparoscopic procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Preoperative pain was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and Pepper Assessment Tool for Disability (PAT-D). Postoperative recovery was evaluated at 2, 4, and 12 weeks using the Postdischarge Surgical Recovery (PSR) scale, Global Surgical Recovery (GSR) index, and PAT-D questionnaire. The primary outcome was PSR scores at 4 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were recruited, with 43 reporting chronic pain and 47 without. Demographics were similar. Patients with chronic pain had higher preoperative BPI and PAT-D scores. Perioperative outcomes and hospital stay were similar. Patients with chronic pain used more postoperative opioids in the hospital (27.0 ± 27.8 vs 24.3 ± 60.3 morphine milligram equivalents [MME]; P = 0.03) and at home (40.1 ± 54.7 vs 19.9 ± 39.0 MME; P = 0.03). The PSR scores at 4 weeks were not significantly different. No differences were observed in PSR or GSR scores at all time points. Patients with chronic pain had a higher PAT-D score at 12 weeks. Fewer chronic pain patients returned to work by 12 weeks and desired more time off work.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with and without chronic pain had similar surgical outcomes and recovery. However, chronic pain patients required more postoperative opioid pain medication and preferred more time off work.

Impact of preoperative opioid exposure on cost of care and workplace productivity loss after elective surgery

INTRODUCTION

A high proportion of surgical patients has previous opioid exposure, which is associated with poorer recovery and increased morbidity. However, much less is known regarding the direct and indirect costs that are associated with healthcare utilization among individuals on preoperative opioid therapy.

METHODS

We analyzed The Merative MarketScan Commercial Database linked with the Merative MarketScan Health and Productivity Management Database to include all adult patients admitted and discharged from common elective surgeries between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2021. Patients were clustered by preoperative opioid exposure and estimates for total direct payments (in USD) generated and workplace absenteeism were assessed for a 6-month period.

RESULTS

10 737 patients were included in our cohort; 17.0% classified as 'low' preoperative opioid use (median oral morphine equivalents (IQR)=126 (75-225)), 5.0% as 'medium' (370 (225-640)) and 3.0% as 'high' (4500 (2120-10 908)). Compared with opioid naive or low preoperative use, individuals with high preoperative use had significantly higher estimated payments for care at 6 months ($4212 for high vs $2706 for naive (p=0.007) and $3059 for low (p=0.045)), while utilizing increased ambulatory care including clinic and outpatient visits after surgery. There was no significant difference in workplace absenteeism between groups.

CONCLUSION

High preoperative opioid use is associated with increased healthcare utilization and costs following common elective surgery. Future efforts should focus on this patient population to explore interventions that could optimize value-based care by improving outcomes and reducing costs.

Predictors of subacute postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty: A secondary analysis of two randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Methods for identifying high-pain responders undergoing total knee arthroplasty remain important to improve individualized pain management. This study aimed at evaluating pre- and perioperative predictors of pain on Days 2-7 after total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of data from 227 patients participating in two randomized trials. Pain outcomes were mean pain during walking on Days 2-7 and on Days 2, 4 and 7. Multivariable linear and logistic regressions were carried out in two steps. First, only preoperative available variables including demographics, comorbidities, pain catastrophizing scale and preoperative pain were evaluated while controlling for trial intervention and recruitment site. In the second step, perioperative variables and pain during walking 24 h postoperatively were added.

RESULTS

The model with only preoperative predictors for mean pain Days 2-7 showed preoperative pain (R-squared 0.097) as the only predictor. In the second model, adding postoperative available variables, only pain 24 h postoperatively (R-squared 0.248) was significant, with a significant main effect of recruitment site. Results for the separate day analysis similarly showed preoperative pain and pain during walking 24 h postoperatively as predictors. The overall best sensitivity (60%) and specificity (74%) for predicting a high-subacute postoperative pain response on Days 2-7 was with cut-off values of VAS 45.5 (out of 100) for pain during walking 24 h postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative pain during walking at 24 h is predictive of subacute postoperative pain on Days 2-7 after total knee arthroplasty, while preoperative pain was only a weak predictor.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study investigated factors associated with pain after total knee arthroplasty beyond the immediate postoperative period. The analysis revealed significant associations between preoperative pain levels and, particularly, pain 24 h postoperatively, with subsequent subacute pain the following week. These findings can assist in identifying patients who would benefit from enhanced, individualized analgesic interventions to facilitate postoperative recovery.

Postoperative pain management in patients with preexisting opioid dependence-A scoping review protocol

BACKGROUND

Opioid-dependent patients with chronic pain conditions present a significant challenge for anesthesiologists when managing acute postsurgical pain. Opioid-dependent patients can experience tolerance, physical dependence, and hyperalgesia. These patients have an increased risk of poorly managed acute postoperative pain, which can ultimately lead to suffering and potentially an overall increase in length of hospitalization and healthcare cost. However, this is an under-researched field. This scoping review aims to investigate effective strategies in managing postoperative pain in patients with preexisting opioid dependence.

METHODS

A scoping review will be conducted on postoperative pain management in patients with preexisting opioid dependence. This review will be prepared according to the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We will conduct a comprehensive search across multiple databases. Backward citation searching of the final included articles will also be conducted. Data extraction will include trial and participant characteristics, intervention details, and reported outcomes.

RESULTS

In the final review the results will be presented as a descriptive summary with supplementary tables, figures, and graphs where applicable.

CONCLUSION

The planned scoping review will map out the current evidence about effective strategies to manage postoperative pain in patients with preexisting opioid dependence. We will aim to identify research gaps that can be used as support in the development of further research.

The Effect of Lidocaine Splash Block Followed by Suspensory Ligament Massage in Female Dogs Undergoing Ovariohysterectomy: A Prospective Study

The administration of lidocaine as part of multimodal analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomies demonstrates variable analgesic efficacy. The aim of this prospective, double-blinded clinical study was to evaluate the effectiveness of lidocaine 2% irrigation on the ovarian suspensory ligament, followed by localised massage, in achieving sufficient intraoperative analgesia. Thirty-eight female dogs were randomly divided to two groups and received either a splash block of 0.5 ml lidocaine 2% on each ovarian suspensory ligament (GL) or an equal volume of saline (GNS). All dogs were premedicated with dexmedetomidine (5 μg·kg-1) and buprenorphine (20 μg·kg-1) intramuscularly and meloxicam (0.2 mg·kg-1) subcutaneously. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane. The surgical procedure was initiated after an adequate depth of anaesthesia was achieved. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (fR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were continuously monitored. Fentanyl (2 μg·kg-1) was administered as rescue analgesia in case of a 30% increase in HR, fR, or MAP, compared to their values before manipulation of the ovaries. Data were analysed using a mixed model for repeated measures ANOVA and Pearson's Chi-Square test. The need for rescue analgesia differed significantly between the two groups (p < 0.0005). In GNS, 89.47% (17/19) of the dogs required rescue analgesia, compared to 10.53% (2/19) of the dogs in GL. The relative risk of rescue for the GNS compared to the GL was approximately 8.5. In conclusion, intraoperative analgesia during ovariohysterectomies in dogs can be enhanced using a lidocaine 2% splash block combined with massage of the ovarian suspensory ligament.

Association between acute pain trajectory and patient-reported outcomes at 6-months following lumbar surgery for patients with lumbar degenerative disease

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between acute pain trajectory over one week and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) at 6-months following lumbar surgery in patients with lumbar degenerative disease (LDD).

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-five subjects with LDD who received surgical treatment at our hospital between April 2019 and March 2022. Acute pain trajectory was measured using a pain trajectory calculator to determine an approximate line using the linear least squares method based on pain intensity on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7. The pain trajectory-slope, which represents the change in postoperative pain intensity of the calculated approximation line, was evaluated as the main exposure for the present study. The PRO was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) measured at 6 ± 1 months postoperatively. Poor PRO scores in this study were defined using a threshold of an ODI of 22% or greater, which represents the patient acceptable symptomatic state after lumbar spine surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis including covariates was performed to investigate the association between pain trajectory-slope and PRO at 6-months following lumbar surgery.

RESULTS

In this study, 101 (39.6%) had poor PRO scores. Multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for covariates showed that pain trajectory-slope was associated with the poor PRO scores (odd ratios; 1.203, 95% confidence intervals; 1.130-1.288).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that acute pain trajectory is significantly associated with poor PRO scores 6-months after lumbar surgery. Patients with slower pain relief or worsening pain were associated with poor PRO scores.

Multiorganizational consensus to define guiding principles for perioperative pain management in patients with chronic pain, preoperative opioid tolerance, or substance use disorder

Significant knowledge gaps exist in the perioperative pain management of patients with a history of chronic pain, substance use disorder, and/or opioid tolerance as highlighted in the US Health and Human Services Pain Management Best Practices Inter-Agency Task Force 2019 report. The report emphasized the challenges of caring for these populations and the need for multidisciplinary care and a comprehensive approach. Such care requires stakeholder alignment across multiple specialties and care settings. With the intention of codifying this alignment into a reliable and efficient processes, a consortium of 15 professional healthcare societies was convened in a year-long modified Delphi consensus process and summit. This process produced seven guiding principles for the perioperative care of patients with chronic pain, substance use disorder, and/or preoperative opioid tolerance. These principles provide a framework and direction for future improvement in the optimization and care of 'complex' patients as they undergo surgical procedures.

Perioperative pain management interventions in opioid user patients: an overview of reviews

BACKGROUND

Every year, many opioid users undergo surgery, experiencing increased postoperative complications, inadequate pain control, and opioid-related adverse effects. This overview aims to summarise and critically assess the systematic reviews about perioperative pain management interventions, identify the knowledge gaps, and potentially provide high-quality recommendations to improve postoperative analgesia and surgical outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted from the following databases, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, AMED, Scopus, PROSPERO, ProQuest, and Epistemonikos, in June 2023. Additionally, reference lists were reviewed. The identified studies were assessed based on eligibility criteria and data extracted by a self-designed form and two independent reviewers. Qualitative data were synthesised, and all included studies were assessed by The Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) checklist.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included. The methodological quality of the studies was mostly critically low. Various interventions were identified, including perioperative management of buprenorphine, ketamine administration, multimodal analgesia, higher doses of medications, patient education, and interprofessional collaboration. The level of certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to high. One high-quality study showed that ketamine administration may improve perioperative analgesia supported with moderate to very low-quality evidence, and low and critically low studies indicated the efficacy of perioperative continuation of buprenorphine with low to very low-quality evidence.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative continuation of buprenorphine and ketamine administration as a multimodal analgesia approach, with moderate to very low-quality evidence, improves pain management in opioid users and decreases opioid-related adverse effects. However, high-quality systematic reviews are required to fill the identified gaps in knowledge.

Trajectories of opioid consumption as predictors of patient-reported outcomes among individuals attending multidisciplinary pain treatment clinics

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify opioid consumption trajectories among persons living with chronic pain (CP) and put them in relation to patient-reported outcomes 6 months after initiating multidisciplinary pain treatment.

METHODS

This study used data from the Quebec Pain Registry (2008-2014) linked to longitudinal Quebec health insurance databases. We included adults diagnosed with CP and covered by the Quebec public prescription drug insurance plan. The daily cumulative opioid doses in the first 6 months after initiating multidisciplinary pain treatment were transformed into morphine milligram equivalents. An individual-centered approach involving principal factor and cluster analyses applied to longitudinal statistical indicators of opioid use was conducted to classify trajectories. Multivariate regression models were applied to evaluate the associations between trajectory group membership and outcomes at 6-month follow-up (pain intensity, pain interference, depression, and physical and mental health-related quality of life).

RESULTS

We identified three trajectories of opioid consumption: "no or very low and stable" opioid consumption (n = 2067, 96.3%), "increasing" opioid consumption (n = 40, 1.9%), and "decreasing" opioid consumption (n = 39, 1.8%). Patients in the "no or very low and stable" trajectory were less likely to be current smokers, experience polypharmacy, use opioids or benzodiazepine preceding their first visit, or experience pain interference at treatment initiation. Patients in the "increasing" opioid consumption group had significantly greater depression scores at 6-month compared to patients in the "no or very low and stable" trajectory group.

CONCLUSION

Opioid consumption trajectories do not seem to be important determinants of most PROs 6 months after initiating multidisciplinary pain treatment.

Simultaneous selection and inference for varying coefficients with zero regions: a soft-thresholding approach

Varying coefficient models have been used to explore dynamic effects in many scientific areas, such as in medicine, finance, and epidemiology. As most existing models ignore the existence of zero regions, we propose a new soft-thresholded varying coefficient model, where the coefficient functions are piecewise smooth with zero regions. Our new modeling approach enables us to perform variable selection, detect the zero regions of selected variables, obtain point estimates of the varying coefficients with zero regions, and construct a new type of sparse confidence intervals that accommodate zero regions. We prove the asymptotic properties of the estimator, based on which we draw statistical inference. Our simulation study reveals that the proposed sparse confidence intervals achieve the desired coverage probability. We apply the proposed method to analyze a large-scale preoperative opioid study.

Surgery patients' perspectives of their role in postoperative pain: A scoping review

Background

Post-operative pain is a major factor in surgical recovery. There is evidence that pain remains undermanaged. Complications related to the undermanagement of acute pain can increase length of stay and contribute to readmission and the development of chronic pain. It is well acknowledged that pain assessment is critical to pain management and that self-report of pain is the gold standard. As a result, patients play a central role in their own pain management. A preliminary review of the literature failed to provide a clear or consistent description of this key patient role.

Objective

A scoping review was conducted with the objective of reviewing literature that described adult patients' perspectives or highlighted the adult patient's role in post-operative pain management, including assessment. Understanding patients' attitudes toward their roles in pain management through a scoping review of the current literature is critical for informing research and improvements in post-operative pain management.

Design

Scoping review.

Methods

The databases searched for the review included CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, and SCOPUS (ending May 2022). Thematic analysis, using the methodology of Arksey and O'Malley, was applied to the records identified.

Results

Of the 106 abstracts initially identified, 26 papers were included in the final analysis. Two major themes identified through thematic analysis were attitudes toward pain and pain management, with the subthemes of patient expectations and beliefs and desire to treat; and care and communication, with the subthemes of pain assessment and education.

Conclusions

This paper provides one of the first known comprehensive scoping reviews of surgical patients' perspectives of their role in pain management, including assessment, and offers an important global awareness of this patient role. The findings suggest that improved understanding of patients' perspectives of their roles in pain assessment and treatment is critical to improving post-operative pain management. Engaging patients as partners in their care can facilitate enhanced communication and improving congruence in pain assessment and treatment decisions. The complex nature of patients' beliefs, expectations, and subjective experiences of pain present challenges for health care practitioners. These challenges can be met with enhanced education for patients, respect for patients' beliefs and expectations, and the provision of dignified care.

Patient-Reported Quality of Recovery after Local Anesthesia versus Brachial Plexus Block in Hand Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Both local anesthesia (LA) and brachial plexus (BP) anesthesia are commonly used in hand surgery. LA has increased efficiency and reduced costs, but BP is often favored for more complex hand surgery, despite requiring greater time and resources. The primary objective of this study was to assess the quality of recovery of patients who received LA or BP block for hand surgery. Secondary objectives were to compare postoperative pain and opioid use.

METHODS

This randomized, controlled, noninferiority study enrolled patients undergoing surgery distal to the carpal bones. Patients were randomized to either LA (wrist or digital block) or BP block (infraclavicular block) before surgery. Patients completed the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire on postoperative day (POD) 1. Pain level was assessed with a numeric pain rating scale, and narcotic consumption was recorded on POD1 and POD3.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients completed the study (LA, n = 46, BP, n = 30). No statistically significant difference was found for median Quality of Recovery-15 score between LA [127.5 (interquartile range, 28)] and BP block [123.5 (interquartile range, 31)]. The inferiority margin of LA to BP block at the 95% confidence interval was less than the minimal clinically important difference of 8, demonstrating noninferiority of LA compared with BP block. There was no statistically significant difference between LA and BP block for numeric pain rating scale scores or narcotic consumption on POD1 and POD3 ( P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

LA is noninferior to BP block for hand surgery with regard to patient-reported quality of recovery, postoperative pain, and narcotic use.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Exploring the postoperative pain experiences of individuals with opioid use disorder and the nurses providing care in the USA: A qualitative descriptive study protocol

INTRODUCTION

The goal of this study is to gain firsthand insights from individuals with a history of opioid use disorder (OUD) using medication for OUD on their experiences with postoperative pain care. This study also seeks to describe the experiences of nurses caring for individuals with OUD, and the challenges they may face managing complaints of pain in this population. Research suggests that hospitals can significantly enhance the quality of the care they deliver by investigating an individual's experience in the care setting. These insights will allow for the development of strategies for nurses to deepen their understanding of and, therefore, advocate and improve care for, this vulnerable and often stigmatised population.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A qualitative descriptive study will be conducted consisting of a prescreening and demographics questionnaire, and individual semistructured interviews with approximately 10-15 individuals with OUD having recently undergone surgery and 10-15 nurses providing care for this population for a total of 20-30 interviews. This approach involves the collection of separate but complementary data (ie, perceptions of individuals with OUD and nurses) concerning the phenomena of postoperative pain management. Sampling will continue until data saturation is reached. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis will then be used. Reporting will adhere to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study received approval from the Institutional Review Board at Northeastern University. Alongside peer-reviewed journal publications, the findings will be presented at relevant conferences, and a plain language summary will be distributed to the study participants.

Current Approaches to Four Challenging Pain Syndromes

During a conference of pain specialists, some of the experts addressed the potential management of four prevalent but difficult painful conditions, namely, chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP), knee osteoarthritis, chest trauma, and facet joint arthropathy. In all cases, the conditions posed challenges in accurate diagnoses as well as safe, effective treatments, especially using locoregional blocks. It is not clear why some surgical patients develop CPSP and others do not, although some risk factors have been identified. More importantly, the transitional phase of pain from acute to chronic deserves greater scrutiny. It appears as if more aggressive and more effective perioperative and postoperative analgesia could help mitigate or possibly prevent CPSP. Knee osteoarthritis is prevalent but is often managed pharmacologically and then with joint replacement; many patients simply live with the condition which can be viewed as a disease of the entire joint. New approaches with intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma, and botulinum toxin may provide safe, effective, and durable pain control. Chest trauma can be extremely painful and a source of morbidity, but its management tends to rely on watchful waiting and drug therapy. New approaches to regional nerve blocks can be beneficial and may reduce troublesome symptoms such as the inability to cough or clear the lungs. Facet joint arthropathy is very prevalent among older people but is not completely clarified. It may be the source of intense pain with limited management strategies. The role of nerve blocks in facet joint arthropathy is an important new addition to the armamentarium of pain management, particularly for geriatric patients.

Prevalence and predictors of opioid use before orthopaedic surgery in an Australian setting: A multicentre, cross-sectional, observational study

Opioid analgesics are commonly used by patients awaiting orthopaedic surgery, and preoperative opioid use is associated with a greater burden of postoperative pain, suboptimal surgical outcomes and higher healthcare costs. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of total opioid use before elective orthopaedic surgery with a focus on regional and rural hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. This was a cross-sectional, observational study of patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery conducted between April 2017 and November 2019 across five hospitals that included a mix of metropolitan, regional, rural, private and public settings. Preoperative patient demographics, pain scores and analgesic use were collected during pre-admission clinic visits, held between two and six weeks before surgery. Of the 430 patients included, 229 (53.3%) were women and the mean age was 67.5 (standard deviation 10.1) years. The overall prevalence of total preoperative opioid use was 37.7% (162/430). Rates of preoperative opioid use ranged from 20.6% (13/63) at a metropolitan hospital to 48.8% (21/43) at an inner regional hospital. Multivariable logistic regression showed that the inner regional setting was a significant predictor of opioid use before orthopaedic surgery (adjusted odds ratio 2.6; 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 6.7) after adjusting for covariates. Opioid use prior to orthopaedic surgery is common and appears to vary by geographical location.

Perioperative Factors Associated With Chronic Opioid Use After Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case control.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the current study is to determine risk factors associated with chronic opioid use after spine surgery.

METHODS

In our single institution retrospective study, 1,299 patients undergoing elective spine surgery at a tertiary academic medical center between January 2010 and August 2017 were enrolled into a prospectively collected registry. Patients were dichotomized based on renewal of, or active opioid prescription at 3-mo and 12-mo postoperatively. The primary outcome measures were risk factors for opioid renewal 3-months and 12-months postoperatively. These primarily included demographic characteristics, operative variables, and in-hospital opioid consumption via morphine milligram equivalence (MME). At the 3-month and 12-month periods, we analyzed the aforementioned covariates with multivariate followed by bivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

Multivariate and bivariate analyses revealed that script renewal at 3 months was associated with black race (P = 0.001), preoperative narcotic (P < 0.001) or anxiety/depression medication use (P = 0.002), and intraoperative long lumbar (P < 0.001) or thoracic spine surgery (P < 0.001). Lower patient income was also a risk factor for script renewal (P = 0.01). Script renewal at 12 months was associated with younger age (P = 0.006), preoperative narcotics use (P = 0.001), and ≥4 levels of lumbar fusion (P < 0.001). Renewals at 3-mo and 12-mo had no association with MME given during the hospital stay or with the usage of PCA (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The current study describes multiple patient-level factors associated with chronic opioid use. Notably, no metric of perioperative opioid utilization was directly associated with chronic opioid use after multivariate analysis.

Predicting severe pain after major surgery: a secondary analysis of the Peri-operative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP) dataset

Acute postoperative pain is common, distressing and associated with increased morbidity. Targeted interventions can prevent its development. We aimed to develop and internally validate a predictive tool to pre-emptively identify patients at risk of severe pain following major surgery. We analysed data from the UK Peri-operative Quality Improvement Programme to develop and validate a logistic regression model to predict severe pain on the first postoperative day using pre-operative variables. Secondary analyses included the use of peri-operative variables. Data from 17,079 patients undergoing major surgery were included. Severe pain was reported by 3140 (18.4%) patients; this was more prevalent in females, patients with cancer or insulin-dependent diabetes, current smokers and in those taking baseline opioids. Our final model included 25 pre-operative predictors with an optimism-corrected c-statistic of 0.66 and good calibration (mean absolute error 0.005, p = 0.35). Decision-curve analysis suggested an optimal cut-off value of 20-30% predicted risk to identify high-risk individuals. Potentially modifiable risk factors included smoking status and patient-reported measures of psychological well-being. Non-modifiable factors included demographic and surgical factors. Discrimination was improved by the addition of intra-operative variables (likelihood ratio χ2 496.5, p < 0.001) but not by the addition of baseline opioid data. On internal validation, our pre-operative prediction model was well calibrated but discrimination was moderate. Performance was improved with the inclusion of peri-operative covariates suggesting pre-operative variables alone are not sufficient to adequately predict postoperative pain.

Error traps in the perioperative care of children with chronic pain

Pediatric patients with a history of chronic pain frequently have complex health needs that are challenging to meet in the perioperative period. Error traps are consequences or errors that are known to occur due to either gaps in knowledge or cognitive errors. Avoiding common error traps in these children can contribute to improved patient care and patient outcomes and overall better patient and family satisfaction. In patients with chronic pain, common errors during their perioperative care included as follows: failure to adequately prepare the patient and family; failure to incorporate past pain history and therapy into current treatment plans; failure to provide adequate multimodal analgesia; and failure to provide multidisciplinary and multimodal analgesia by incorporating other services such as mental health services and physical therapy. Cognitive errors may play a role in these error traps. Recognizing and avoiding them may improve and optimize pain care and outcome.

Chronic pain after surgery and trauma: current situation and future directions

Chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) stands as a major health issue. The unchanged incidence over the last two decades underlines both the failure of predictive models developed until now and the lack of efficacy of common “preventive” strategies (pharmacotherapy and regional analgesic techniques) applied in current clinical practice. The recognition of CPSP as a disease and the release of a common definition of the condition is an important progress in the field. CPSP predictive scores exist but none has presently demonstrated an impact on patient care. New clinical directions based on the resolution of postoperative pain, a complex and highly dynamic process supported by individual pain trajectories, argue for predictive models and preventive strategies extended to the subacute pain period i.e. after hospital discharge.

Musculoskeletal Pain Management and Patient Mental Health and Well-being

Orthopaedic trauma patients have high rates of psychiatric disorders, which put them at risk for worse outcomes after injury and surgery, including worse pain. Mental health conditions, such as depression and anxiety, can affect the perception of pain. Pain can also exacerbate or contribute to the development of mental illness after injury. Interventions to address both mental health and pain among orthopaedic trauma patients are critical. Balancing safety and comfort amid a drug overdose epidemic is challenging, and many clinicians do not feel comfortable addressing mental health or have the resources necessary. We reviewed the literature on the complex relationship between pain and mental health and presented examples of scalable and accessible interventions that can be implemented to promote the health and recovery of our patients. Interventions described include screening for depression in the orthopaedic trauma clinic and the emergency department or inpatient setting during injury and using a comprehensive and evidence-based multimodal pain management regimen that blends pharmacologic alternatives to opioids and physical and cognitive strategies to manage pain.

Error traps in acute pain management in children

Providing effective acute pain management to hospitalized children can help improve outcomes, decrease length of stay, and increase patient and parental satisfaction. Error traps (circumstances that lead to erroneous actions or undesirable consequences) can result in inadequately controlled pain, unnecessary side effects, and adverse events. This article highlights five error traps encountered when managing acute pain in children. They include failure to appropriately assess pain, optimally utilize regional anesthesia, select suitable systemic analgesics, identify and treat medication-related side effects, and consider patient characteristics when choosing medication or dosing route. These issues are easily addressed when the clinician is cognizant of ways to anticipate, identify, and mitigate or avoid these errors.

Identifying multiple knee pain trajectories and the prediction of opioid and NSAID medication used: A latent class growth approach

BACKGROUND

Knee pain is a major source of distress and disability, with pain progression highly variable between individuals. Previous studies defining pain trajectories have all used a single measure of pain, and these differ across studies. Different measures reflect diverse pain mechanisms. To ascertain the clinical utility of pain trajectories, we explored associations between opioid and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use.

METHODS

We model pain trajectories using two measures-Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) and the painDETECT, in 2141 participants, across 3 waves (the baseline, 1- and 3-year assessments) of the Knee Pain In the Community (KPIC) cohort.

RESULTS

Latent class growth analysis identified six trajectories using ICOAP subscales (High-Stable, Low-Stable, Moderate Worsening, Moderate Recovering, Worsening, and Recovering) and four trajectories using painDETECT (High-stable, Low-stable, Moderate Worsening, and Moderate Recovering). There was a high degree of correspondence between people assigned to pain trajectories between ICOAP intermittent and constant subscales, but less so using painDETECT. Opioid use was associated with ICOAP trajectories only (e.g., High-Stable and Worsening intermittent ICOAP trajectories) and in women.

CONCLUSION

Different measures of pain produce different patterns of pain progression and these are differentially related to medication use. Opioid use is linked to trajectories of pain based on the impact of pain on behavior and not pain symptoms. Thus, managing pain's behavioral impact is more central to understanding opioid use than managing pain symptoms. These findings support more in-depth questioning about the type of pain and its progression in clinical practice.

The Association Between Preoperative Opioid Exposure and Prolonged Postoperative Use

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of nonchronic, periodic preoperative opioid use on prolonged opioid fills after surgery.

BACKGROUND

Nonchronic, periodic opioid use is common, but its effect on prolonged postoperative opioid fills is not well understood. We hypothesize greater periodic opioid use before surgery is correlated with persistent postoperative use.

METHODS

We used a national private insurance claims database, Optum's de-identifed Clinformatics Data Mart Database, to identify adults undergoing general, gynecologic, and urologic surgical procedures between 2008 and 2015 (N = 191,043). We described patterns of opioid fills based on dose, recency, duration, and continuity to categorize preoperative opioid exposure. Patients with chronic use were excluded. Our primary outcome was persistent postoperative use, defined as filling an opioid prescription between 91- and 180-days post-discharge. The association between preoperative opioid use and persistent use was determined using multivariable logistic regression, controlling for clinical covariates.

RESULTS

In the year before surgery, 41% of patients had nonchronic, periodic opioid fills. Compared with other risk factors, patterns of preoperative fills were most strongly correlated with persistent postoperative opioid use. Patients with recent intermittent use were significantly more likely to have prolonged fills after surgery compared with opioid-naïve patients [minimal use: odds ratio (OR): 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.89-2.03; remote intermittent: OR 4.7, 95% CI 4.46-4.93; recent intermittent: OR 12.2, 95% CI 11.49-12.90].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with nonchronic, periodic opioid use before surgery are vulnerable to persistent postoperative opioid use. Identifying opioid use before surgery is a critical opportunity to optimize care after surgery.

Preoperative opioid use in patients undergoing shoulder surgery

BACKGROUND

Opioids are commonly used to manage pain from acute injury or chronic degenerative diseases. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of preoperative opioid use in patients undergoing shoulder surgery and the clinical factors associated with preoperative opioid use.

METHODS

This was an analytical cross-sectional study of 175 patients undergoing shoulder surgery at an urban hospital from June 2015 to June 2017. Multivariable regression models were used to determine independent associations.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients reported preoperative opioid use, which was significantly associated with primary procedure performed (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT]), higher body mass index (BMI), unemployment, lower income, smoking, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, greater number of previous surgeries, higher comorbidity burden, and decreased expectations to exercise and do recreational activities (p < 0.05). Preoperative opioid use was independently associated with worse scores on the: Numeric Pain Scale, ASES, IPAQ, and PROMIS domains of Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Social Satisfaction (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

More than one in four patients reported preoperative opioid use. Several health measures, including worse pain, function, and social satisfaction were independently associated with preoperative opioid use. These findings suggest that orthopaedic surgeons need to identify patients using opioids preoperatively in order to effectively establish and execute a plan for pain management, which may include weaning off opioids prior to surgery, managing psychological distress, and optimizing coping strategies.Level of Evidence: III.

AAAPT: Assessment of the Acute Pain Trajectory

OBJECTIVE

Define and contrast acute pain trajectories vs. the aggregate pain measurements, summarize appropriate linear and nonlinear statistical analyses for pain trajectories at the patient level, and present methods to classify individual pain trajectories. Clinical applications of acute pain trajectories are also discussed.

SETTING

In 2016, an expert panel involving the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION), American Pain Society (APS), and American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM) established an initiative to create a pain taxonomy, named the ACTTION-APS-AAPM Pain Taxonomy (AAAPT), for the multidimensional classification of acute pain. The AAAPT panel commissioned the present report to provide further details on analysis of the individual acute pain trajectory as an important component of comprehensive pain assessment.

METHODS

Linear mixed models and nonlinear models (e.g., regression splines and polynomial models) can be applied to analyze the acute pain trajectory. Alternatively, methods for classifying individual pain trajectories (e.g., using the 50% confidence interval of the random slope approach or using latent class analyses) can be applied in the clinical context to identify different trajectories of resolving pain (e.g., rapid reduction or slow reduction) or persisting pain. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages that may guide selection. Assessment of the acute pain trajectory may guide treatment and tailoring to anticipated symptom recovery. The acute pain trajectory can also serve as a treatment outcome measure, informing further management.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of trajectory approaches to acute pain assessments enables more comprehensive measurement of acute pain, which forms the cornerstone of accurate classification and treatment of pain.

Predictors of one year chronic post-surgical pain trajectories following thoracic surgery

PURPOSE

Chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) is a highly prevalent complication following thoracic surgery. This is a prospective cohort study that aims to describe the pain trajectories of patients undergoing thoracic surgery beginning preoperatively and up to 1 year after surgery METHODS: Two hundred and seventy nine patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery were enrolled. Participants filled out a preoperative questionnaire containing questions about their sociodemographic information, comorbidities as well as several psychological and pain-related statuses. They were then followed-up during their immediate postoperative period and at the three, six and 12 month time-points to track their postoperative pain, complications and pain-related outcomes. Growth mixture modeling was used to construct pain trajectories.

RESULTS

The first trajectory is characterized by 185 patients (78.1%) with mild pain intensity across the 12 month period. The second is characterized by 32 patients (7.5%) with moderate pain intensity immediately after surgery which decreases markedly by 3 months and remains low at the 12 month follow-up. The final trajectory is characterized by 20 patients (8.4%) with moderate pain intensity immediately after surgery which persists at 12 months. Patients with moderate to severe postoperative pain intensity were much more likely to develop CPSP compared to patients with mild pain intensity. Initial pain intensity levels immediately following surgery as well as levels of pain catastrophizing at baseline were predicting pain trajectory membership. None of the surgical or anesthetic-related variables were significantly associated with pain trajectory membership.

CONCLUSION

Patients who undergo thoracic surgery can have postoperative pain that follows one of the three different types of trajectories. Higher levels of immediate postoperative pain and preoperative pain catastrophizing were associated with moderately severe CPSP.

Bupivacaine infiltration for acute postoperative pain management after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite increased attention, acute and persistent post-operative pain are not treated efficiently and interventions against acute pain are therefore of clinical importance and should be welcomed.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of wound infiltration with 0.5% bupivacaine for pain management in the immediate post-operative period in patients that underwent cardiac surgery with sternotomy.

DESIGN

The study was performed employing a single-centre nonrandomized experimental design to evaluate a prospective cohort of patients recruited from June to December of 2017.

METHODS

A single-centre study with a non-randomized experimental design compared the pain perceived by 137 patients undergoing to cardiac surgery within which 68 patients who received infiltration of bupivacaine and 69 patients received infiltration with saline solution. Pain measures were made with the numeric rating scale (NRS) at 2, 12, 24, and 48 hours. Socio-demographic and clinical variables were included too and descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was found between the means of the NRS scores in favour of the intervention group. Cohen's d showed a significant effect size. NRS scores were grouped into NRS ≥4 or NRS <4 and similar results were found. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed the absence of confounding factors that could call results into question.

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneous infiltration of 0.5% bupivacaine in the surgical site of patients who have undergone cardiac surgery showed clinically and statistically significant pain relief compared with patients who received saline infiltration throughout the first 12 hours after surgery. This intervention provides promising preliminary results that, alone or in conjunction with other nursing interventions, could constitute an important therapeutic tool for this area of nursing clinical practice.

Toxicology Screening Testing in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Chronic opioid use and polypharmacy are commonly seen in chronic pain patients presenting for spine procedures. Substance abuse and misuse have also been reported in this patient population. Negative perioperative effects have been found in patients exposed to chronic opioid, alcohol, and recreational substances. Toxicology screening testing (TST) in the perioperative period provides useful information for adequate preoperative optimization and perioperative planning.

METHODS

We designed a pilot study to understand this population's preoperative habits including accuracy of self-report and TST-detected prescribed and unprescribed medications and recreational substances. We compared the results of the TST to the self-reported medications using Spearman correlations.

RESULTS

Inconsistencies between TST and self-report were found in 88% of patients. Spearman correlation was 0.509 between polypharmacy and intraoperative propofol use, suggesting that propofol requirement increased as the number of substances used increased.

CONCLUSIONS

TST in patients presenting for spine surgery is a useful tool to detect substances taken by patients because self-report is often inaccurate. Discrepancies decrease the opportunity for preoperative optimization and adequate perioperative preparation.

From Tramadol to Methadone: Opioids in the Treatment of Pain and Dyspnea in Pediatric Palliative Care

BACKGROUND

More than 15,000 children die annually in the United States due to an underlying life-limiting disease and the majority of those children experience distressing symptoms, which are not adequately relieved, such as pain and dyspnea. Multimodal analgesia, that is multiple agents, interventions, rehabilitation, psychological modalities, and integrative (nonpharmacologic) therapies, act synergistically for more effective pediatric pain and symptom control with fewer side effects than a single analgesic or modality. However, opioids, such as morphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, oxycodone, and methadone (in the United Kingdom: diamorphine) remain the mainstay medication to effectively treat pain and dyspnea in children with serious illness.

METHODS

This article reviews commonly used opioids in Pediatric Palliative Care, which a special emphasis on 2 potentially particularly effective multimechanistic opioids: tramadol and methadone.

RESULTS

Methadone, due to its multimechanistic action profile, is possibly among the most effective and most underutilized opioid analgesics in children with severe unrelieved pain at end of life. However, methadone should not be prescribed by those unfamiliar with its use: Its effects should be closely monitored for several days, particularly when it is first started and after any dose changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Tramadol appears to play a key role in treating episodes of inconsolability in children with progressive neurologic, metabolic, or chromosomally based condition with impairment of the central nervous system. However, the recent 2017 United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning against pediatric use of tramadol does not seem to be based on clinical evidence, and therefore puts children at risk for unrelieved pain or increased respiratory depression.

The Effects of Adjunctive Pain Medications on Postoperative Inpatient Opioid Use in Abdominally Based Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The purposes of this study were to quantify the amount of opioid medication used postoperatively in the hospital setting after abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction, to determine factors that are associated with increased opioid use, and to identify other adjunctive medications that may contribute to decreased opioid use.

METHODS

An electronic medical record data pull was performed at the University of Pennsylvania from November 2016 to October 2018. Cases were identified using Current Procedural Terminology code 19364. Only traditional recovery after surgery protocol patients were included. Patient comorbidities, surgical details, and pain scores were captured. Postoperative medications including non-patient-controlled analgesia opioid use and adjunctive nonopioid pain medications were recorded. Non-patient-controlled analgesia total opioid use was calculated and converted to oral morphine milligram equivalents (mme). Statistical analysis was performed using t test analyses and linear regression.

RESULTS

A total of 328 patients satisfied our inclusion criteria. Five hundred forty free flaps were performed (212 bilateral vs 116 unilateral, 239 immediate vs 89 delayed). Bilateral patients used on average 115.2 mme (95% confidence interval [CI], 103.4-127.0 mme) compared with 89.0 mme in unilateral patients (95% CI, 70.0-108.0 mme; P = 0.015). Patients with abdominal mesh placement (n = 249) required 113.0 mme (95% CI, 100.5-125.5 mme) compared with 83.8 mme (95% CI, 68.8-98.7 mme) for patients without mesh (n = 79; P = 0.016). Each additional hour of surgery increased postoperative mme by 9.4 (P < 0.01). Patients with a nonzero preoperative pain score required 100.3 mme (95% CI, 90.2-110.4 mme) compared with 141.1 mme (95% CI, 102.7-179.7 mme) for patients with preoperative pain score greater than 0/10 (P < 0.01). Patients with postoperative index pain score ≤5/10 required 89.2 mme (95% CI, 78.6-99.8 mme) compared with 141.1 mme (95% CI, 119.9-162.2 mme) for patients with postoperative index pain score >5/10 (P < 0.01). After regression analysis, a dose of intravenous acetaminophen 1000 mg was found to decrease postoperative mme by 11.7 (P = 0.024). A dose of oral ibuprofen 600 mg was found to decrease postoperative mme by 8.3 (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral reconstruction and longer surgery resulted in increased postoperative mme. Patients with no preoperative pain required less opioids than did patients with preexisting pain. Patients with good initial postoperative pain control required less opioids than did patients with poor initial postoperative pain control. Intravenous acetaminophen and oral ibuprofen were found to significantly decrease postoperative mme.

Preoperative Assessment and Management of Patients with Pain and Anxiety Disorders

Purpose of Review

This review summarizes selected recent evidence on issues important for preoperative pain evaluation.

Recent Findings

Opioids, though a mainstay of postoperative pain management, are associated with both short and increasingly recognized long-term risks, including persistent opioid use. Risk factors for high levels of acute postoperative pain as well as chronic postsurgical pain may overlap, including psychological factors such as depression, anxiety, and catastrophizing. Tools to predict those at risk for poor postoperative pain outcomes are being studied.

Summary

Preoperative pain and psychological factors can affect postoperative pain outcomes. More work is needed in the future to develop practical interventions in the preoperative period to address these factors.

Pre-operative opioid use in gynecologic oncology: a common comorbidity relevant to the peri-operative period

OBJECTIVES

Pre-operative opioid use is common and should be considered a comorbidity among surgical candidates. Our objective was to describe the rate of pre-operative opioid use and patterns of post-operative outpatient opioid prescribing in a cohort of gynecologic oncology patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted with 448 gynecologic oncology surgical patients undergoing surgery for a suspected or known cancer diagnosis from January 2016 to December 2016. Pre-operative opioid users (n=97) were identified. Patient and surgical characteristics were abstracted, as was post-operative opioid prescription (type of opioid, oral morphine equivalents amount) and length of stay. For pre-operative opioid users, the type of opioid prescribed post-operatively was compared with the type of pre-operative opioid. Pre-operative opioid users were compared with non-users, stratified by surgery type. Descriptive statistics were analyzed using χ2 statistic, and medians were compared using a Mann-Whitney U statistic.

RESULTS

Pre-operative opioid prescriptions were noted in 21% of patients, and 24% of these had two or more opioid prescriptions before surgery. The majority of pre-operative opioid users (51%) were maintained on the same agent post-operatively at the time of discharge, but 36% were switched to a different opioid and 7% were prescribed an additional opioid. Overall and in laparotomies, pre-operative opioid users received higher volume post-operative prescriptions than non-users. There was no difference in post-operative prescription volume for minimally invasive surgeries or in length of stay between pre-operative users and non-users.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative opioid use is common in gynecologic oncology patients and should be considered during pre-operative planning. Pre-operative opioid use was associated with a higher volume and wider range of post-operative prescription. Over 40% of opioid users were discharged with either an additional opioid or a new opioid, highlighting a potential missed opportunity to optimize opioid safety. Further research is needed to characterize the relationship between pre-operative opioid use and peri-operative outcomes and to develop strategies to manage pain effectively in this population without compromising opioid safety.

An Update on the Basic and Clinical Science of Ketamine Analgesia

OBJECTIVE

In the context of the current opioid epidemic, there has been a renewed interest in the use of ketamine as an analgesic agent.

METHODS

We reviewed ketamine analgesia.

RESULTS

Ketamine is well-known as an antagonist for N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. In addition, it can regulate the function of opioid receptors and sodium channels. Ketamine also increases signaling through α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors. These myriad of molecular and cellular mechanisms are responsible for a number of pharmacological functions including pain relief and mood regulation. Clinically, a number of studies have investigated the role of ketamine in the setting of acute and chronic pain, and there is evidence that ketamine can provide analgesia in a variety of pain syndromes.

DISCUSSION

In this review, we examined basic mechanisms of ketamine and its current clinical use and potential novel use in pain management.

Prevalence of Preoperative Opioid Use and Characteristics Associated With Opioid Use Among Patients Presenting for Surgery

Importance

Patterns of preoperative opioid use are not well characterized across different surgical services, and studies in this patient population have lacked important self-reported data of pain and affect.

Objectives

To assess the prevalence of preoperative opioid use and the characteristics of these patients in a broadly representative surgical cohort.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Cross-sectional, observational study of patients undergoing surgery at a tertiary care academic medical center. Data were collected as a part of large prospective institutional research registries from March 1, 2010, through April 30, 2016.

Exposures

Preoperative patient and procedural characteristics, including prospectively assessed self-reported pain and functional measures.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Patient-reported opioid use before surgery.

Results

Of the total 34 186 patients recruited (54.2% women; mean [SD] age, 53.1 [16.1] years), preoperative opioid use was reported in 7894 (23.1%). The most common opioids used were hydrocodone bitartrate (4685 [59.4%]), tramadol hydrochloride (1677 [21.2%]), and oxycodone hydrochloride (1442 [18.3%]). Age of 31 to 40 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.10-1.45), tobacco use (former use aOR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.22-1.42]; current use aOR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.48-1.78]), illicit drug use (aOR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.16-2.60), higher pain severity (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.31-1.35), depression (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.12-1.33), higher Fibromyalgia Survey scores (aOR, 1.06, 95% CI, 1.05-1.07), lower life satisfaction (aOR, 0.95, 95% CI, 0.93-0.96), and more medical comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiology score aOR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.37-1.58]; Charlson Comorbidity Index aOR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.18-1.41]) were all independently associated with preoperative opioid use. Preoperative opioid use was most commonly reported by patients undergoing orthopedic (226 [65.1%]) and neurosurgical spinal (596 [55.1%]) procedures and least common among patients undergoing thoracic procedures (244 [15.7%]). After adjusting for patient characteristics, the patients undergoing lower extremity procedures were most likely to report preoperative opioid use (aOR, 3.61; 95% CI, 2.81-4.64), as well as those undergoing pelvic (excluding hip) (aOR, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.88-5.08), upper extremity (aOR, 3.07; 95% CI, 2.12-4.45), and spinal or spinal cord (aOR, 2.68; 95% CI, 2.15-3.32) procedures, with the group undergoing intrathoracic surgery as the reference group.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this large study of preoperative opioid use that includes patient-reported outcome measures, more than 1 in 4 patients presenting for surgery reported opioid use. These data provide important insights into this complicated patient population that would appear to help guide future preoperative optimization and perioperative opioid-weaning interventions.

Predictors of Prolonged Opioid Use Following Colectomy

BACKGROUND

The United States is in the middle of an opioid epidemic. Gastrointestinal surgery has been ranked in the top 3 surgical subspecialties for highest opioid prescribing.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to determine the rate of and risk factors for prolonged opioid use following colectomy.

DESIGN

This study utilized data (2015-2017) from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 5 institutions.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at 2 academic and 3 community hospitals.

PATIENTS

Included were 1243 patients who underwent colectomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was rate of prolonged opioid use defined as a new opioid prescription 90 to 180 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 132 (10.6%) patients were prolonged opioid users. In univariate analysis, patients who were prolonged opioid users were significantly more likely to have had more than one opioid prescription in the prior year, to have a higher ASA classification, to undergo an open procedure, to have an ostomy created, and to be discharged with a high quantity of opioids (all p < 0.05). Prolonged opioid users were significantly more likely to have a complication (p = 0.007) or readmission (p = 0.003) within 30 days of the index procedure. In multivariable analysis, prior opioid use (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.6-4.2; p < 0.001), ostomy creation (OR, 2.1; 95% CI,1.2-3.7; p = 0.01), higher quantity of opioid prescription at discharge (OR, 1.9; 95% CI,1.1-3.3; p = 0.03), higher ASA classification (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6; p = 0.02), and hospital readmission (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.4; p = 0.01) were independent predictors of prolonged opioid use.

LIMITATIONS

This study is a retrospective review, and all variables related to prolonged opioid use are not collected in the data.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of patients undergoing colectomy become prolonged opioid users. We have identified risk factors for prolonged postoperative opioid use, which may allow for improved patient education and targets for intervention preoperatively, as well as implementation of programs for monitoring and cessation of opioid use in the postoperative period. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A973. PREDICTORES DEL USO PROLONGADO DE OPIOIDES DESPUÉS DE LA COLECTOMÍA: Los Estados Unidos se encuentran en medio de una epidemia de opioides. La cirugía gastrointestinal ha sido clasificada entre las tres subespecialidades quirúrgicas principales para la prescripción más alta de opioides.

OBJETIVO

El objetivo de este estudio es determinar la tasa y los factores de riesgo para el uso prolongado de opioides después de la colectomía. DISEÑO:: Este estudio utilizó datos (2015-2017) del Programa Nacional de Mejoramiento de la Calidad Quirúrgica del Colegio Americano de Cirujanos de cinco instituciones.

MARCO

Dos hospitales académicos y tres comunitarios.

PACIENTES

1,243 pacientes sometidos a una colectomía.

MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO PRINCIPALES

El resultado primario fue la tasa de uso prolongado de opioides, definida como una nueva receta de opioides entre 90 y 180 días después de la operación.

RESULTADOS

Un total de 132 (10.6%) pacientes fueron usuarios de opioides por tiempo prolongado. En el análisis univariado, los pacientes que eran usuarios prolongados de opioides tenían una probabilidad significativamente mayor de haber tenido más de una receta de opioides en el año anterior, tenían una clasificación más alta de la Asociación Americana de Anestesiólogos, se sometieron a un procedimiento abierto, se les creó una ostomía y se les dio de alta con una cantidad grande de opioides (todos p < 0.05). Los usuarios de opioides prolongados fueron significativamente más propensos a tener una complicación (p = 0.007) o readmisión (p = 0.003) dentro de los 30 días del procedimiento índice. En el análisis multivariado, el uso previo de opioides (OR, 2.6; IC 95%, 1.6-4.2; p < 0.001), creación de ostomía (OR, 2.1; IC 95%, 1.2-3.7; p = 0.01), mayor cantidad de prescripción de opioides al dar de alta (OR, 1.9; IC 95%, 1.1-3.3; p = 0.03), clasificación más alta de la Asociación Americana de Anestesiólogos (OR, 1.7; IC 95%, 1.1-2.6; p = 0.02) y reingreso hospitalario (OR, 2.0; IC del 95%, 1.2-3.4, p = 0.01) fueron predictores independientes del uso prolongado de opioides.

LIMITACIONES

Este estudio es una revisión retrospectiva y todos los variables relacionadas con el uso prolongado de opioides no se colectaron en los datos.

CONCLUSIONES

Una proporción significativa de pacientes con colectomía se convierten en usuarios prolongados de opioides. Hemos identificado factores de riesgo para el uso prolongado de opioides postoperatorios, que pueden permitir una mejor educación del paciente y objetivos para la intervención preoperatoria, así como la implementación de programas para la supervisión y cese del uso de opioides en el período postoperatorio. Vea el Video de Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/A973.

Defining trajectories of acute pain in surgical patients short title: acute pain follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Assessment of acute postoperative pain is mandatory for effective treatments. Pain trajectories may help professionals improve treatments. It has been suggested that uncontrolled pain in the immediate postoperative period generates higher pain intensities on the following days of hospital stay.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationship between pain during the first postoperative hour and the first 24 postoperative hours.

METHODS

Setting: a general university hospital. Study design: a prospective observational, analytical study of patients undergoing surgical procedures under general anesthesia and hospitalized for at least 24 hours. Five assessments of pain were carried out during the first hour in the recovery room followed by three assessments during the first 24 hours. The slopes of pain trajectories were calculated, and the relationship between them was analyzed.

RESULTS

234 patients were recruited, 31.3% had uncontrolled pain on arrival at the recovery room; at the end of the first 24 hours after surgery, 5.5% of the patients had uncontrolled pain. The first pain intensity score in the recovery room correlated negatively with the slope for the first hour (P1): rS = -0.657 (p = 0.000). Similarly, the first pain intensity score had a negative association with the pain trajectory slope during the hospital stay (P2): rS = -0.141 (p = 0.032). When comparing the two slopes, a nonsignificant negative correlation was found: rS = -0.126.

CONCLUSIONS

the trajectory of pain during the first hour does not predict the behavior of the trajectory during the first day after surgery.

Perioperative Pain Management for the Chronic Pain Patient With Long-Term Opioid Use

In the United States nearly one in four patients presenting for surgery reports current opioid use. Many of these patients suffer from chronic pain disorders and opioid tolerance or dependence. Opioid tolerance and preexisting chronic pain disorders present unique challenges in regard to postoperative pain management. These patients benefit from providers who are not only familiar with multimodal pain management and skilled in the assessment of acute pain, but also empathetic to their specific struggles. Chronic pain patients often face stigmas surrounding their opioid use, and this may lead to underestimation and undertreatment of their pain. This article aims to review the challenges presented by these complex patients and provide strategies for treating acute postoperative pain in opioid-tolerant patients.

Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Postsurgical Pain: A Narrative Review

Chronic postsurgical pain affects between 5 and 75% of patients, often with an adverse impact on quality of life. While the transition of acute to chronic pain is a complex process-involving multiple mechanisms at different levels-the current strategies for prevention have primarily been restricted to perioperative pharmacological interventions. In the present paper, we first present an up-to-date narrative literature review of these interventions. In the second section, we develop several ways by which we could overcome the limitations of the current approaches and enhance the outcome of our surgical patients, including the better identification of individual risk factors, tailoring treatment to individual patients, and improved acute and subacute pain evaluation and management. The third and final section covers the treatment of established CPSP. Given that evidence for the current therapeutic options is limited, we need high-quality trials studying multimodal interventions matched to pain characteristics.

Pain Trajectory After Ankle Surgeries for Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND:

The pain trajectory after ankle surgeries for osteoarthritis is relevant to describe. The purpose of this prospective study was to describe pain after ankle surgery and explore the link between perioperative factors and the development of postoperative pain.

METHODS:

Duration, severity, type of preoperative pain, psychological distress, opioid consumption, and type of surgery were evaluated in 49 patients who were followed for 18 months. Acute postoperative pain in the first 10 days after surgery was modeled by a pain trajectory. Univariate analysis was conducted to identify predictors of acute pain trajectory and chronic pain.

RESULTS:

Eighty-seven percent of patients had preoperative chronic pain, 34% had a high postoperative pain trajectory, 44% of whom reported chronic pain at 18 months. The patients who developed a high acute pain trajectory had higher preoperative opioid consumption (50% vs 19.4%, P = .04), a higher incidence of preoperative neuropathic pain (68.8% vs 32.3%, P = .02), a higher brief pain inventory score (51.5 vs 34, P = .01), and a higher psychological distress score (8 vs 3, P = .002). The patients who developed chronic pain had a higher brief pain inventory score (42 vs 33, P = .04), a higher psychological distress score (6 vs 4, P = .04), and a higher preoperative pain intensity (8 vs 6, P = .008). No association was found between the type of ankle surgery and pain.

CONCLUSION:

Patients with psychological distress and more severe preoperative pain were more at risk to develop acute pain and chronic pain after ankle surgery regardless of the surgery performed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Level II, prospective comparative study.

Are opioids indispensable for general anaesthesia?

The drug-induced, reversible coma of anaesthesia requires three clinical outcomes: unconsciousness, immobility, and the control of autonomic nervous system (ANS) responses to surgical stimulation. Producing the anaesthetised state with a single anaesthetic agent, such as an inhaled vapour or propofol, is challenging, primarily because suppressing ANS responses requires very high anaesthetic concentrations, resulting in haemodynamic depression and prolonged recovery. The antinociceptive effects of opioids (i.e. minimum alveolar concentration reduction) are thus central to the well-entrenched 'balanced anaesthesia' concept. In recent years, the notion of 'multimodal general anaesthesia' has extended the concept of balanced anaesthesia to include more drugs that target different neuroanatomical circuits and multiple neurophysiologic mechanisms. The opioid epidemic has provided some of the motivation to move away from opioids toward other adjunct drugs. Persistent opioid use after surgery is a component of the opioid epidemic and is a major concern for perioperative physicians. Potential solutions to the problem of persistent opioid use after surgery have focused on proper 'opioid stewardship' after operation, wherein opioids are used conservatively in combination with other analgesic adjuncts, and excessive opioid prescribing for home use is avoided. But there is a paucity of data on how intraoperative opioid usage patterns may be contributing to persistent opioid use after surgery. There are cogent reasons to moderate perioperative opioid use, including intraoperative opioids, but whether these changes in practice integral to the multimodal general anaesthesia concept will improve anaesthesia outcomes, including persistent opioid use after surgery, is unknown. Studies investigating these issues are an important research priority.

Preoperative Long-Acting Opioid Use Is Associated with Increased Length of Stay and Readmission Rates After Elective Surgeries

Objectives To compare postoperative outcomes in patients prescribed long-acting opioids vs opioid-naïve patients who underwent elective noncardiac surgeries.

Design Retrospective cohort study.

Setting Single urban academic institution.

Methods and Subjects We retrospectively compared postoperative outcomes in long-acting opioid users vs opioid-naïve patients who underwent elective noncardiac surgeries. Inpatient and ambulatory surgery cohorts were separately analyzed. Preoperative medication lists were queried for the presence of long-acting opioids or absence of opioids. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to analyze the impact of long-acting opioid use on readmission rate, respiratory failure, and adverse cardiac events. Multivariable zero-truncated negative binomial regression was used to examine length of stay.

Results After exclusions, there were 93,644 adult patients in the study population, 23,605 of whom underwent inpatient surgeries and 70,039 of whom underwent ambulatory surgeries. After adjusting for potential confounders and inpatient surgeries, preoperative long-acting opioid use was associated with increased risk of prolonged length of stay (incidence rate ratio = 1.1, 99% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0–1.2, P &lt; 0.01) but not readmission. For ambulatory surgeries, preoperative long-acting opioid use was associated with increased risk of all-cause as well as pain-related readmission (odds ratio [OR] = 2.1, 99% CI = 1.5–2.9, P &lt; 0.001; OR = 2.0, 99% CI = 0.85–4.2, P = 0.02, respectively). There were no significant differences for respiratory failure or adverse cardiac events.

Conclusions The use of preoperative long-acting opioids was associated with prolonged length of stay for inpatient surgeries and increased risk of all-cause and pain-related readmission for ambulatory surgeries. Timely interventions for patients on preoperative long-acting opioids may be needed to improve these outcomes.

The Effect of Preoperative Medications on Length of Stay, Inpatient Pain, and Narcotics Consumption After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between preoperative medications and length of stay, inpatient pain, and narcotics consumption after a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous studies have identified risk factors for increased length of hospital stay, inpatient pain, and narcotics consumption. However, little is known regarding the effects of preoperative medications on outcomes after spine surgery.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained surgical database of patients undergoing primary, single-level MIS TLIF was retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative medications taken within 30 days before surgery were recorded for each patient and categorized by medication type. Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to determine the association between preoperative medications and length of stay, pain scores, and narcotics consumption. Multivariate analysis was performed using a backwards, stepwise regression to identify independent risk factors.

RESULTS

In total, 138 patients were included in this analysis. On bivariate analysis, benzodiazepines were associated with longer hospital stays [relative risk (RR)=2.03; P=0.031]. Benzodiazepines (RR=3.71; P<0.001) and preoperative narcotics (RR=2.60; P=0.012) were risk factors for pain ≥7 on postoperative day 0. On multivariate analysis, benzodiazepines were an independent risk factor for prolonged stay. Benzodiazepines, narcotics, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories were identified as independent risk factors for increased postoperative pain.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that benzodiazepines are a risk factor for increased length of stay and postoperative pain after MIS TLIF. Preoperative narcotics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories were also identified as risk factors for postoperative pain though this did not lead to increases in narcotics consumption. Patients taking these medications should undergo more vigilant perioperative monitoring for adequate pain management. More work must be done to further elucidate the association between preoperative medications and postoperative outcomes after MIS TLIF.

In-hospital opioid consumption, but not pain intensity scores, predicts 6-month levels of pain catastrophizing following hepatic resection: A trajectory analysis

BACKGROUND

The study aims were to model acute pain intensity and opioid consumption trajectories up to 72 hr after open hepatic resection, identify predictors of trajectory membership and examine the association between trajectory memberships and 6-month pain and psychological outcomes. This is a long-term analysis of a published randomized controlled trial on the impact of medial open transversus abdominis plane catheters on post-operative outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 152 patients (89 males; mean age 63.0 [range: 54-72]) completed questionnaires on pain and related characteristics pre-operatively and 6 months post-operatively. Total opioid use was recorded several times over a 72-hr period while self-reported pain intensity scores were collected multiple times until hospital discharge. Analyses were carried out using growth mixture modelling, logistic regression and general linear models.

RESULTS

Both pain intensity and opioid consumption showed that a four-trajectory model best fits the data. Patients in the lowest opioid consumption trajectory were more likely to be classified in the constant mild pain intensity trajectory. Age and baseline levels of anxiety significantly predicted opioid trajectory membership while baseline depressive symptoms significantly predicted pain intensity trajectory membership. Patients in the two highest opioid consumption trajectories reported significantly higher levels of pain catastrophizing at 6 months compared to patients in the other 3 trajectories (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

High consumption of opioids after surgery is associated with higher levels of pain catastrophizing 6 months later. Identification of patients within these trajectories may lead to the development of early interventions targeted to high risk individuals.

SIGNIFICANCE

Differences in initial levels of opioid consumption and rates of change in opioid consumption shortly after surgery can help predict long-term psychological responses to pain. Identifying key characteristics associated with initial opioid consumption can lead to the development of cost-effective early interventions targeted to high risk individuals.