(422) CR845, a peripheral kappa opioid, provides better pain relief with less nausea and vomiting than placebo in patients after bunionectomy

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of a novel kappa opioid receptor agonist ZYKR1: a randomized double-blind placebo-control phase 1 study in healthy adult human participants

To perform first-in-human single-dose escalation trial of ZYKR1, which is a potent, selective, and peripherally-restricted kappa opioid receptor agonist, is the purpose of this study. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single ascending dose study conducted at Zydus Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India included healthy male participants aged 18-55 years and weighing > 50 kg. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ZYKR1. The secondary objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PD) of ZYKR1. Participants received ZYKR1 (0.5 - 6 mcg/kg) or placebo infused intravenously in 15 ± 1 min. Of total five dose groups (0.5 - 6 mcg/kg), each group included eight participants with six and two randomized to ZYKR1 and placebo, respectively. Three participants experienced six treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); two were gastrointestinal disorders (nausea and vomiting at 2 mcg/kg); and four were related to the nervous system (headache (at 2 mcg/kg) and facial tingling, facial numbness and paresthesia (at 6 mcg/kg)); all TEAEs were mild and resolved without sequelae. The Cmax of ZYKR1 was achieved after 15 - 20 min of start of infusion. The mean exposures (Cmax and AUC0 - t) increased in a dose-proportional manner. The mean t1/2 ranged from 2.20 to 2.98 h across the dose range. Increase in the mean prolactin level was significantly higher in treatment groups compared with that in the placebo group. Intravenous ZYKR1 at doses up to 6 mcg/kg showed acceptable safety and tolerability and demonstrated a short half-life with principal route of excretion as renal. ZYKR1 displayed a potent PD effect reflected by increased prolactin levels, supporting further study in patients. Trial registration Clinical Trial Registry of India: CTRI/2018/07/014927. Date of registration: 18/07/2018.

Impact of Difelikefalin on the Health-Related Quality of Life of Haemodialysis Patients with Moderate-To-Severe Chronic Kidney Disease-Associated Pruritus: A Single-Arm Intervention Trial

OBJECTIVE

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) can have a substantial negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), including an increased risk of depression, anxiety and sleep disturbance. This trial aimed to assess the impact of intravenous difelikefalin on HRQoL in haemodialysis patients with moderate-to-severe CKD-aP.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of an open-label, multicentre, single-arm intervention trial assessed pruritus severity and HRQoL at baseline and at 12 weeks of difelikefalin treatment using Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS), Sleep Quality Numeric Rating Scale (SQ-NRS), 5-D itch scale, Skindex-10 scale, EQ-5D-5L with Pruritus Bolt-On (EQ-PSO).

RESULTS

A total of 222 patients received ≥ 1 dose of difelikefalin, and 197 patients completed 12 weeks of difelikefalin treatment. Clinically meaningful changes from baseline to 12 weeks were observed in all disease-specific measures: 73.7% of patients achieved a ≥ 3-point reduction in the weekly mean of 24 h WI-NRS scores and 66% of patients experienced ≥ 3-point improvements in SQ-NRS scores. Improvements were also observed in all Skindex-10 scale and 5-D itch scale domain scores. The percentage of patients reporting no problems in all EQ-PSO domains increased from 1.4 to 24.7% (p < 0.001), respectively. Patients' generic HRQoL EQ-5D-5L mean utility and EQ-5D visual analogue scale scores increased from baseline to 12 weeks: mean changes 0.04 (p = 0.001) and 2.8 (p = 0.046), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing haemodialysis with moderate-to-severe CKD-aP receiving difelikefalin reported experiencing clinically meaningful improvements in both their pruritus symptoms and itch-related QoL.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov registration number, NCT03998163; first submitted, 7 May 2019.

Druggable Targets and Compounds with Both Antinociceptive and Antipruritic Effects

Pain and itch are both important manifestations of various disorders, such as herpes zoster, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis. Growing evidence suggests that both sensations have shared mediators, overlapping neural circuitry, and similarities in sensitization processes. In fact, pain and itch coexist in some disorders. Determining pharmaceutical agents and targets for treating pain and itch concurrently is of scientific and clinical relevance. Here we review the neurobiology of pain and itch and discuss the pharmaceutical targets as well as novel compounds effective for the concurrent treatment of these sensations.

Evaluation of the abuse potential of difelikefalin, a selective kappa-opioid receptor agonist, in recreational polydrug users

Difelikefalin, a selective kappa‐opioid receptor agonist with limited central nervous system penetration, is being developed for the treatment of chronic pruritic conditions. This randomized, double‐blind, active‐ and placebo‐controlled, four‐way crossover study was designed to evaluate the abuse potential of difelikefalin in healthy recreational polydrug users. Using a 4 × 4 Williams design, nondependent adult users of opioids and hallucinogens (N = 44) were randomized to receive single intravenous (i.v.) injections of difelikefalin at supratherapeutic doses (5 and 15 mcg/kg); pentazocine (0.5 mg/kg), a schedule IV mu‐opioid partial agonist and kappa‐opioid receptor agonist; and placebo. The abuse potential of difelikefalin was compared with pentazocine and placebo using the maximal score (maximum effect [E_max]) of the Drug Liking visual analog scale (VAS; primary end point), along with multiple secondary end points of subject‐rated measures and pupillometry. Difelikefalin produced significantly lower Drug Liking VAS E_max, and lower peak positive, sedative, and perceptual effects compared with pentazocine. These effects of difelikefalin were small, brief, and not dose‐dependent, although marginally greater than those observed with placebo. Neither dose of difelikefalin elicited significant negative or hallucinogenic effects. On end‐of‐session measures of overall drug liking and willingness to take the drug again, difelikefalin did not differ from placebo, indicating subjects neither liked nor disliked the effects overall and did not feel motivated to take the drug again. Consistent with its lack of mu agonist activity, difelikefalin did not induce miosis compared with pentazocine. All treatments were generally well‐tolerated. This study indicates that difelikefalin presents a low potential for abuse.

Effect of difelikefalin, a selective kappa opioid receptor agonist, on respiratory depression: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Difelikefalin, a selective kappa opioid receptor agonist designed to limit central nervous system (CNS) penetration, is under development for the treatment of pruritus. Its hydrophilic, small-peptidic structure limits CNS entry, minimizing potential CNS-mediated adverse events (AEs). This study assessed the effect of difelikefalin on key relevant measures of respiratory depression in healthy volunteers. This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study enrolled healthy, nonsmoking volunteers. Subjects were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment sequences of difelikefalin (1.0 or 5.0 mcg/kg i.v.) or placebo on sequential days with an intervening 24 (±2) h washout period. The primary end points included incidence of increased end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2 ) greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg versus baseline or a level greater than 50 mm Hg sustained greater than or equal to 30 seconds, and incidence of reduction in saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2 ) to less than 92% sustained greater than or equal to 30 seconds. Secondary end points included incidence of reduced respiratory rate and other safety assessments. Fifteen subjects were randomized and completed the study. No subject on placebo or difelikefalin met the increased ETCO2 or reduced SpO2 primary end point criteria for respiratory depression. All respiratory measures in each group remained near baseline values during 4-h postdose observations. No subject met the reduced respiratory rate criterion or experienced clinically significant changes in ETCO2 , SpO2 , or respiratory rate. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs; ≥20% of subjects) were paresthesia, hypoesthesia, and somnolence in the difelikefalin arms. All TEAEs were mild and resolved without intervention. Difelikefalin 1.0 and 5.0 mcg/kg i.v. did not produce respiratory depression.

Dilemma of Addiction and Respiratory Depression in the Treatment of Pain: A Prototypical Endomorphin as a New Approach

OBJECTIVE

Although mu-opioid receptor agonists have been the mainstay of analgesic regimens for moderate to severe pain, they are associated with serious side effects, risks, and limitations. We evaluate the most serious risks associated with conventional opioids and compare these with the pharmacology of CYT-1010, a prototypical endomorphin and mu-opioid receptor agonist.

RESULTS

Addiction and respiratory depression are serious risks of traditional mu-opioid analgesics. Mitigation strategies have been inadequate at addressing the opioid crisis and may interfere with the effective treatment of pain. Improved understanding of mu-opioid receptor biology and the discovery in 1997 of an additional and unique family of endogenous opioid peptides (endomorphins) have provided a pathway for dissociating analgesia from opioid-related adverse events and developing new classes of mu-opioid receptor agonists that use biased signaling and/or target novel sites to produce analgesia with reduced side effect liability. Endomorphin-1 and -2 are endogenous opioid peptides highly selective for mu-opioid receptors that exhibit potent analgesia with reduced side effects. CYT-1010 is a cyclized, D-lysine-containing analog of endomorphin-1 with a novel mechanism of action targeting traditional mu- and exon 11/truncated mu-opioid receptor 6TM variants. CYT-1010 preclinical data have demonstrated reduced abuse potential and analgesic potency exceeding that of morphine. In an initial phase 1 clinical study, CYT-1010 demonstrated significant analgesia vs baseline and no respiratory depression at the dose levels tested.

CONCLUSIONS

CYT-1010 and other novel mu-opioid receptor agonists in clinical development are promising alternatives to conventional opioids that may offer the possibility of safer treatment of moderate to severe pain.

Are Opioids Needed to Treat Chronic Low Back Pain? A Review of Treatment Options and Analgesics in Development

The continued prevalence of chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a testament to our lack of understanding of the potential causes, leading to significant treatment challenges. CLBP is the leading cause of years lived with disability and the fifth leading cause of disability-adjusted life-years. No single non-pharmacologic, pharmacologic, or interventional therapy has proven effective as treatment for the majority of patients with CLBP. Although non-pharmacologic therapies are generally helpful, they are often ineffective as monotherapy and many patients lack adequate access to these treatments. Noninvasive treatment measures supported by evidence include physical and chiropractic therapy, yoga, acupuncture, and non-opioid and opioid pharmacologic therapy; data suggest a moderate benefit, at most, for any of these therapies. Until our understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of CLBP advances, clinicians must continue to utilize rational multimodal treatment protocols. Recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for opioid prescribing recommend that opioids not be utilized as first-line therapy and to limit the doses when possible for fear of bothersome or dangerous adverse effects. In combination with the current opioid crisis, this has caused providers to minimize or eliminate opioid therapy when treating patients with chronic pain, leaving many patients suffering despite optimal nonopioid therapies. Therefore, there remains an unmet need for effective and tolerable opioid receptor agonists for the treatment of CLBP with improved safety properties over legacy opioids. There are several such agents in development, including opioids and other agents with novel mechanisms of action. This review critiques non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment modalities for CLBP and examines the potential of novel opioids and other analgesics that may be a useful addition to the treatment options for patients with chronic pain.

A Phase 3 Trial of Difelikefalin in Hemodialysis Patients with Pruritus

BACKGROUND

Difelikefalin is a peripherally restricted and selective agonist of kappa opioid receptors that are considered to be important in modulating pruritus in conditions such as chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients undergoing hemodialysis who had moderate-to-severe pruritus to receive either intravenous difelikefalin (at a dose of 0.5 μg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo three times per week for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with an improvement (decrease) of at least 3 points from baseline at week 12 in the weekly mean score on the 24-hour Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS; scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater itch intensity). The secondary outcomes included the change from baseline in itch-related quality-of-life measures, the percentage of patients with an improvement of at least 4 points in the WI-NRS score at week 12, and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 378 patients underwent randomization. A total of 82 of 158 patients (51.9%) in the difelikefalin group had a decrease of at least 3 points in the WI-NRS score (primary outcome), as compared with 51 of 165 (30.9%) in the placebo group. The imputed percentage of patients with a decrease of at least 3 points in the WI-NRS score was 49.1% in the difelikefalin group, as compared with 27.9% in the placebo group (P<0.001). Difelikefalin also resulted in a significant improvement from baseline to week 12 in itch-related quality of life as measured by the 5-D itch scale and the Skindex-10 scale. The imputed percentage of patients with a decrease of at least 4 points in the WI-NRS score at week 12 was significantly greater in the difelikefalin group than in the placebo group (37.1% [observed data: 64 of 158 patients] vs. 17.9% [observed data: 35 of 165 patients], P<0.001). Diarrhea, dizziness, and vomiting were more common in the difelikefalin group than in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with difelikefalin had a significant reduction in itch intensity and improved itch-related quality of life as compared with those who received placebo. (Funded by Cara Therapeutics; KALM-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03422653.).