1
|
Chowdhury NS, Bi C, Furman AJ, Chiang AKI, Skippen P, Si E, Millard SK, Margerison SM, Spies D, Keaser ML, Da Silva JT, Chen S, Schabrun SM, Seminowicz DA. Predicting Individual Pain Sensitivity Using a Novel Cortical Biomarker Signature. JAMA Neurol 2025; 82:237-246. [PMID: 39869323 PMCID: PMC11773403 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.4857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 11/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2025]
Abstract
Importance Biomarkers would greatly assist decision-making in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of chronic pain. Objective To undertake analytical validation of a sensorimotor cortical biomarker signature for pain consisting of 2 measures: sensorimotor peak alpha frequency (PAF) and corticomotor excitability (CME). Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study at a single center (Neuroscience Research Australia) recruited participants from November 2020 to October 2022 through notices placed online and at universities across Australia. Participants were healthy adults aged 18 to 44 years with no history of chronic pain or a neurological or psychiatric condition. Participants experienced a model of prolonged temporomandibular pain with outcomes collected over 30 days. Electroencephalography to assess PAF and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess CME were recorded on days 0, 2, and 5. Pain was assessed twice daily from days 1 through 30. Exposure Participants received an injection of nerve growth factor (NGF) to the right masseter muscle on days 0 and 2 to induce prolonged temporomandibular pain lasting up to 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures The predictive accuracy of the PAF/CME biomarker signature was determined using a nested control-test scheme: machine learning models were run on a training set (n = 100), where PAF and CME were predictors and pain sensitivity was the outcome. The winning classifier was assessed on a test set (n = 50) comparing the predicted pain labels against the true labels. Results Among the final sample of 150 participants, 66 were female and 84 were male; the mean (SD) age was 25.1 (6.2) years. The winning classifier was logistic regression, with an outstanding area under the curve (AUC = 1.00). The locked model assessed on the test set had excellent performance (AUC = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99). Results were reproduced across a range of methodological parameters. Moreover, inclusion of sex and pain catastrophizing as covariates did not improve model performance, suggesting the model including biomarkers only was more robust. PAF and CME biomarkers showed good to excellent test-retest reliability. Conclusions and Relevance This study provides evidence for a sensorimotor cortical biomarker signature for pain sensitivity. The combination of accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability suggests the PAF/CME biomarker signature has substantial potential for clinical translation, including predicting the transition from acute to chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nahian S. Chowdhury
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chuan Bi
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore
- Division of Biostatistics, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Andrew J. Furman
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore
| | - Alan K. I. Chiang
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Patrick Skippen
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Data Sciences, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emily Si
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Samantha K. Millard
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah M. Margerison
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore
| | - Darrah Spies
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore
| | - Michael L. Keaser
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore
| | - Joyce T. Da Silva
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore
| | - Shuo Chen
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore
| | - Siobhan M. Schabrun
- The Gray Centre for Mobility and Activity, Parkwood Institute, St Joseph’s Healthcare, London, Ontario, Canada
- School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - David A. Seminowicz
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chowdhury NS, Chang WJ, Cheng D, Manivasagan N, Seminowicz DA, Schabrun SM. The effect of prolonged elbow pain and rTMS on cortical inhibition: A TMS-EEG study. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.11.26.625334. [PMID: 39651216 PMCID: PMC11623566 DOI: 10.1101/2024.11.26.625334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Recent studies using combined transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) have shown that pain leads to an increase in the N45 peak of the TMS-evoked potential (TEP), which is mediated by GABAergic inhibition. Conversely, 10Hz repetitive TMS (10Hz-rTMS), which provides pain relief, reduces the N45 peak. However, these studies used brief pain stimuli (lasting minutes), limiting their clinical relevance. The present study determined the effect of pain and 10Hz-rTMS on the N45 peak in a prolonged pain model (lasting several days) induced by nerve growth factor (NGF) injection to the elbow muscle. Materials and Methods Experiment 1 : TEPs were measured in 22 healthy participants on Day 0 (pre-NGF), Day 2 (peak pain), and Day 7 (pain resolution). Experiment 2 : We examined the effect of 5 days of active (n=16) or sham (n=16) rTMS to the left primary motor cortex (M1) on the N45 peak during prolonged NGF-induced pain, with TEPs measured on Day 0 and Day 4 (post-rTMS). Results Experiment 1: While no overall change in the N45 peak was seen, a correlation emerged between higher pain severity on Day 2 and a larger increase in the N45 peak. Experiment 2 : Active rTMS reduced the N45 peak on Day 4 vs. Day 0, with no effect in the sham group. Conclusion Our findings suggest that (i) higher pain severity correlates with an increase in the N45 peak, and (ii) rTMS decreases cortical inhibition in a model of prolonged experimental pain. This study extends previous research by demonstrating a link between pain perception and cortical inhibition within a prolonged pain context.
Collapse
|
3
|
Chowdhury NS, Bi C, Furman AJ, Chiang AKI, Skippen P, Si E, Millard SK, Margerison SM, Spies D, Keaser ML, Da Silva JT, Chen S, Schabrun SM, Seminowicz DA. A novel cortical biomarker signature predicts individual pain sensitivity. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.06.16.24309005. [PMID: 39399054 PMCID: PMC11469350 DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.16.24309005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2024]
Abstract
Importance Biomarkers would greatly assist decision making in the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of chronic pain. Objective The present study aimed to undertake analytical validation of a sensorimotor cortical biomarker signature for pain consisting of two measures: sensorimotor peak alpha frequency (PAF) and corticomotor excitability (CME). Design In this cohort study (recruitment period: November 2020-October 2022), participants experienced a model of prolonged temporomandibular pain with outcomes collected over 30 days. Electroencephalography (EEG) to assess PAF and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess CME were recorded on Days 0, 2 and 5. Pain was assessed twice daily from Days 1-30. Setting Data collection occurred at a single centre: Neuroscience Research Australia. Participants We enrolled 159 healthy participants (through notices placed online and at universities across Australia), aged 18-44 with no history of chronic pain, neurological or psychiatric condition. 150 participants completed the protocol. Exposure Participants received an injection of nerve growth factor (NGF) to the right masseter muscle on Days 0 and 2 to induce prolonged temporomandibular pain lasting up to 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures We determined the predictive accuracy of the PAF/CME biomarker signature using a nested control-test scheme: machine learning models were run on a training set (n = 100), where PAF and CME were predictors and pain sensitivity was the outcome. The winning classifier was assessed on a test set (n = 50) comparing the predicted pain labels against the true labels. Results The final sample consisted of 66 females and 84 males with a mean age of 25.1 ± 6.2. The winning classifier was logistic regression, with an outstanding area under the curve (AUC=1.00). The locked model assessed on the test set had excellent performance (AUC=0.88[0.78-0.99]). Results were reproduced across a range of methodological parameters. Moreover, inclusion of sex and pain catastrophizing as covariates did not improve model performance, suggesting the model including biomarkers only was more robust. PAF and CME biomarkers showed good-excellent test-retest reliability. Conclusions and Relevance This study provides evidence for a sensorimotor cortical biomarker signature for pain sensitivity. The combination of accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability, suggests the PAF/CME biomarker signature has substantial potential for clinical translation, including predicting the transition from acute to chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nahian S Chowdhury
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chuan Bi
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine
- Division of Biostatistics, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, USA
| | - Andrew J Furman
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, USA
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, USA
| | - Alan KI Chiang
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Patrick Skippen
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Data Sciences, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Emily Si
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Samantha K Millard
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah M Margerison
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, USA
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, USA
| | - Darrah Spies
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, USA
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, USA
| | - Michael L Keaser
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, USA
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, USA
| | - Joyce T Da Silva
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, USA
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, USA
| | - Shuo Chen
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine
| | - Siobhan M Schabrun
- The Gray Centre for Mobility and Activity, Parkwood Institute, St. Joseph’s Healthcare London, Canada
- School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - David A Seminowicz
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, USA
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, USA
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chowdhury NS, Taseen K, Chiang A, Chang WJ, Millard SK, Seminowicz DA, Schabrun SM. A 5-day course of rTMS before pain onset ameliorates future pain and increases sensorimotor peak alpha frequency. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.06.11.598596. [PMID: 38915700 PMCID: PMC11195234 DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.11.598596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown promise as an intervention for pain. An unexplored research question is whether the delivery of rTMS prior to pain onset might protect against a future episode of prolonged pain. The present study aimed to determine i) whether 5 consecutive days of rTMS delivered prior to experimentally-induced prolonged jaw pain could reduce future pain intensity and ii) whether any effects of rTMS on pain were mediated by changes in corticomotor excitability (CME) and/or sensorimotor peak alpha frequency (PAF). On each day from Day 0-4, forty healthy individuals received a single session of active (n = 21) or sham (n = 19) rTMS over the left primary motor cortex. PAF and CME were assessed on Day 0 (before rTMS) and Day 4 (after rTMS). Prolonged pain was induced via intramuscular injection of nerve growth factor (NGF) in the right masseter muscle after the final rTMS session. From Days 5-25, participants completed twice-daily electronic dairies including pain on chewing and yawning (primary outcomes), as well as pain during other activities (e.g. talking), functional limitation in jaw function and muscle soreness (secondary outcomes). Compared to sham, individuals who received active rTMS subsequently experienced lower pain on chewing and yawning. Although active rTMS increased PAF, the effects of rTMS on pain were not mediated by changes in PAF or CME. This study is the first to show that rTMS delivered prior to pain onset can protect against future pain and associated functional impairment. Thus, rTMS may hold promise as a prophylactic intervention for persistent pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nahian S Chowdhury
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Khandoker Taseen
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alan Chiang
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wei-Ju Chang
- School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Samantha K Millard
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - David A Seminowicz
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Siobhan M Schabrun
- The Gray Centre for Mobility and Activity, Parkwood Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare, London, Canada
- School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sato Y, Takanaka S, Izumi SI. Alteration of Interhemispheric Inhibition in Patients With Lateral Epicondylalgia. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2024; 25:104440. [PMID: 38065465 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Patients with lateral epicondylalgia (LE) show alterations in the primary motor cortex (M1) contralateral to the affected side. Cortical alterations have been investigated by measuring intracortical facilitation/inhibition; however, their association with pain remains controversial. Furthermore, no studies have investigated changes in interhemispheric inhibition (IHI). IHI can be assessed using the ipsilateral silent period (iSP) known as the temporary inhibition of electromyographic activity evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in the ipsilateral M1 of the contracting muscle. To better understand the relationship between cortical alterations and pain in LE, this observational study investigated the relationship between iSP and pain in LE. Twenty-seven healthy volunteers and 21 patients with LE were recruited. The duration of iSP in the extensor carpi radialis brevis was measured. The IHI asymmetry ratio was calculated to determine the IHI balance. Pain and disability were scored using the Japanese version of the patient-rated elbow evaluation. We observed increased inhibitory input from the ipsilateral M1 on the affected side to the contralateral M1 in LE. Additionally, the IHI balance correlated with pain severity. Hence, regulating imbalanced IHI can potentially decrease lateral elbow pain in LE. PERSPECTIVE: Patients with lateral epicondylalgia (LE) experience persistent pain and cortical alterations. However, there is no established relationship between cortical alterations and pain. This study demonstrated that the interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) balance is correlated with pain. Regulating imbalanced IHI can potentially decrease lateral elbow pain in patients with LE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yosuke Sato
- Course of Rehabilitation, Department of Health Sciences, Tohoku Fukushi University, Aoba-ku, City, Miyagi, Japan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai City, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Shun Takanaka
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai City, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Shin-Ichi Izumi
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai City, Miyagi, Japan; Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai City, Miyagi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Suhood AY, Summers SJ, Opar DA, Astill T, An WW, Rio E, Cavaleri R. Bilateral Corticomotor Reorganization and Symptom Development in Response to Acute Unilateral Hamstring Pain: A Randomized, Controlled Study. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2024; 25:1000-1011. [PMID: 37907112 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
Accumulating evidence demonstrates that pain induces adaptations in the corticomotor representations of affected muscles. However, previous work has primarily investigated the upper limb, with few studies examining corticomotor reorganization in response to lower limb pain. This is important to consider, given the significant functional, anatomical, and neurophysiological differences between upper and lower limb musculature. Previous work has also focused on unilateral corticomotor changes in response to muscle pain, despite an abundance of literature demonstrating that unilateral pain conditions are commonly associated with bilateral motor dysfunction. For the first time, this study investigated the effect of unilateral acute hamstring pain on bilateral corticomotor organization using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) mapping. Corticomotor outcomes (TMS maps), pain, mechanical sensitivity (pressure pain thresholds), and function (maximal voluntary contractions) were recorded from 28 healthy participants at baseline. An injection of pain-inducing hypertonic (n = 14) or pain-free isotonic (n = 14) saline was then administered to the right hamstring muscle, and pain ratings were collected every 30 seconds until pain resolution. Follow-up measures were taken immediately following pain resolution and at 25, 50, and 75 minutes post-pain resolution. Unilateral acute hamstring pain induced bilateral symptom development and changes in corticomotor reorganization. Two patterns of reorganization were observed-corticomotor facilitation and corticomotor depression. Corticomotor facilitation was associated with increased mechanical sensitivity and decreased function bilaterally (all P < .05). These effects persisted for at least 75 minutes after pain resolution. PERSPECTIVE: These findings suggest that individual patterns of corticomotor reorganization may contribute to ongoing functional deficits of either limb following acute unilateral lower limb pain. Further research is required to assess these adaptations and the possible long-term implications for rehabilitation and reinjury risk in cohorts with acute hamstring injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane Y Suhood
- Brain Stimulation and Rehabilitation Lab, School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Simon J Summers
- Brain Stimulation and Rehabilitation Lab, School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Biomedical Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - David A Opar
- Sports Performance, Recovery, Injury and New Technologies (SPRINT) Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia; School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tom Astill
- Brain Stimulation and Rehabilitation Lab, School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Winko W An
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ebonie Rio
- School of Allied Health, La Trobe University Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; The Victorian Institute of Sport, Albert Park, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rocco Cavaleri
- Brain Stimulation and Rehabilitation Lab, School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Biomedical Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chowdhury NS, Chiang AKI, Millard SK, Skippen P, Chang WJ, Seminowicz DA, Schabrun SM. Combined transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography reveals alterations in cortical excitability during pain. eLife 2023; 12:RP88567. [PMID: 37966464 PMCID: PMC10651174 DOI: 10.7554/elife.88567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to examine inhibitory and facilitatory circuits during experimental pain and in chronic pain populations. However, current applications of TMS to pain have been restricted to measurements of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from peripheral muscles. Here, TMS was combined with electroencephalography (EEG) to determine whether experimental pain could induce alterations in cortical inhibitory/facilitatory activity observed in TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). In Experiment 1 (n=29), multiple sustained thermal stimuli were administered to the forearm, with the first, second, and third block of thermal stimuli consisting of warm but non-painful (pre-pain block), painful (pain block) and warm but non-painful (post-pain block) temperatures, respectively. During each stimulus, TMS pulses were delivered while EEG (64 channels) was simultaneously recorded. Verbal pain ratings were collected between TMS pulses. Relative to pre-pain warm stimuli, painful stimuli led to an increase in the amplitude of the frontocentral negative peak ~45 ms post-TMS (N45), with a larger increase associated with higher pain ratings. Experiments 2 and 3 (n=10 in each) showed that the increase in the N45 in response to pain was not due to changes in sensory potentials associated with TMS, or a result of stronger reafferent muscle feedback during pain. This is the first study to use combined TMS-EEG to examine alterations in cortical excitability in response to pain. These results suggest that the N45 TEP peak, which indexes GABAergic neurotransmission, is implicated in pain perception and is a potential marker of individual differences in pain sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nahian Shahmat Chowdhury
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research AustraliaSydneyAustralia
- University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| | - Alan KI Chiang
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research AustraliaSydneyAustralia
- University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| | - Samantha K Millard
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research AustraliaSydneyAustralia
- University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| | - Patrick Skippen
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research AustraliaSydneyAustralia
| | - Wei-Ju Chang
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research AustraliaSydneyAustralia
- School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
| | - David A Seminowicz
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research AustraliaSydneyAustralia
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western OntarioLondonCanada
| | - Siobhan M Schabrun
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research AustraliaSydneyAustralia
- The Gray Centre for Mobility and Activity, University of Western OntarioLondonCanada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rockholt MM, Kenefati G, Doan LV, Chen ZS, Wang J. In search of a composite biomarker for chronic pain by way of EEG and machine learning: where do we currently stand? Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1186418. [PMID: 37389362 PMCID: PMC10301750 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1186418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Machine learning is becoming an increasingly common component of routine data analyses in clinical research. The past decade in pain research has witnessed great advances in human neuroimaging and machine learning. With each finding, the pain research community takes one step closer to uncovering fundamental mechanisms underlying chronic pain and at the same time proposing neurophysiological biomarkers. However, it remains challenging to fully understand chronic pain due to its multidimensional representations within the brain. By utilizing cost-effective and non-invasive imaging techniques such as electroencephalography (EEG) and analyzing the resulting data with advanced analytic methods, we have the opportunity to better understand and identify specific neural mechanisms associated with the processing and perception of chronic pain. This narrative literature review summarizes studies from the last decade describing the utility of EEG as a potential biomarker for chronic pain by synergizing clinical and computational perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mika M. Rockholt
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Management, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - George Kenefati
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Management, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Lisa V. Doan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Management, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Zhe Sage Chen
- Department of Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Neuroscience & Physiology, Neuroscience Institute, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, New York University Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY, United States
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Management, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Neuroscience & Physiology, Neuroscience Institute, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, New York University Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vucic S, Stanley Chen KH, Kiernan MC, Hallett M, Benninger DH, Di Lazzaro V, Rossini PM, Benussi A, Berardelli A, Currà A, Krieg SM, Lefaucheur JP, Long Lo Y, Macdonell RA, Massimini M, Rosanova M, Picht T, Stinear CM, Paulus W, Ugawa Y, Ziemann U, Chen R. Clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurological disorders. Updated report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2023; 150:131-175. [PMID: 37068329 PMCID: PMC10192339 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
The review provides a comprehensive update (previous report: Chen R, Cros D, Curra A, Di Lazzaro V, Lefaucheur JP, Magistris MR, et al. The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119(3):504-32) on clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in neurological diseases. Most TMS measures rely on stimulation of motor cortex and recording of motor evoked potentials. Paired-pulse TMS techniques, incorporating conventional amplitude-based and threshold tracking, have established clinical utility in neurodegenerative, movement, episodic (epilepsy, migraines), chronic pain and functional diseases. Cortical hyperexcitability has emerged as a diagnostic aid in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Single-pulse TMS measures are of utility in stroke, and myelopathy even in the absence of radiological changes. Short-latency afferent inhibition, related to central cholinergic transmission, is reduced in Alzheimer's disease. The triple stimulation technique (TST) may enhance diagnostic utility of conventional TMS measures to detect upper motor neuron involvement. The recording of motor evoked potentials can be used to perform functional mapping of the motor cortex or in preoperative assessment of eloquent brain regions before surgical resection of brain tumors. TMS exhibits utility in assessing lumbosacral/cervical nerve root function, especially in demyelinating neuropathies, and may be of utility in localizing the site of facial nerve palsies. TMS measures also have high sensitivity in detecting subclinical corticospinal lesions in multiple sclerosis. Abnormalities in central motor conduction time or TST correlate with motor impairment and disability in MS. Cerebellar stimulation may detect lesions in the cerebellum or cerebello-dentato-thalamo-motor cortical pathways. Combining TMS with electroencephalography, provides a novel method to measure parameters altered in neurological disorders, including cortical excitability, effective connectivity, and response complexity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve Vucic
- Brain, Nerve Research Center, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Kai-Hsiang Stanley Chen
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Matthew C Kiernan
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney; and Department of Neurology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Australia
| | - Mark Hallett
- Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - David H Benninger
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Switzerland
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo M Rossini
- Department of Neurosci & Neurorehab IRCCS San Raffaele-Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Benussi
- Centre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alfredo Berardelli
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli; Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Currà
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Alfredo Fiorini Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina, LT, Italy
| | - Sandro M Krieg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, EA4391, ENT, Créteil, France; Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France
| | - Yew Long Lo
- Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, and Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | - Marcello Massimini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Cliniche, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Rosanova
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas Picht
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Cluster of Excellence: "Matters of Activity. Image Space Material," Humboldt University, Berlin Simulation and Training Center (BeST), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Cathy M Stinear
- Department of Medicine Waipapa Taumata Rau, University of Auckland, Auckland, Aotearoa, New Zealand
| | - Walter Paulus
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Yoshikazu Ugawa
- Department of Human Neurophysiology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Japan
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 27, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Robert Chen
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital-UHN, Division of Neurology-University of Toronto, Toronto Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chowdhury NS, Skippen P, Si E, Chiang AKI, Millard SK, Furman AJ, Chen S, Schabrun SM, Seminowicz DA. The reliability of two prospective cortical biomarkers for pain: EEG peak alpha frequency and TMS corticomotor excitability. J Neurosci Methods 2023; 385:109766. [PMID: 36495945 PMCID: PMC9848447 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many pain biomarkers fail to move from discovery to clinical application, attributed to poor reliability and an inability to accurately classify at-risk individuals. Preliminary evidence has shown that high pain sensitivity is associated with slow peak alpha frequency (PAF), and depression of corticomotor excitability (CME), potentially due to impairments in ascending sensory and descending motor pathway signalling respectively NEW METHOD: The present study evaluated the reliability of PAF and CME responses during sustained pain. Specifically, we determined whether, over several days of pain, a) PAF remains stable and b) individuals show two stable and distinct CME responses: facilitation and depression. Participants were given an injection of nerve growth factor (NGF) into the right masseter muscle on Day 0 and Day 2, inducing sustained pain. Electroencephalography (EEG) to assess PAF and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess CME were recorded on Day 0, Day 2 and Day 5. RESULTS Using a weighted peak estimate, PAF reliability (n = 75) was in the excellent range even without standard pre-processing and ∼2 min recording length. Using a single peak estimate, PAF reliability was in the moderate-good range. For CME (n = 74), 80% of participants showed facilitation or depression of CME beyond an optimal cut-off point, with the stability of these changes in the good range. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS No study has assessed the reliability of PAF or feasibility of classifying individuals as facilitators/depressors, in response to sustained pain. PAF was reliable even in the presence of pain. The use of a weighted peak estimate for PAF is recommended, as excellent test-retest reliability can be obtained even when using minimal pre-processing and ∼2 min recording. We also showed that 80% of individuals exhibit either facilitation or depression of CME, with these changes being stable across sessions. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides support for the reliability of PAF and CME as prospective cortical biomarkers. As such, our paper adds important methodological advances to the rapidly growing field of pain biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nahian S Chowdhury
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Patrick Skippen
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emily Si
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alan K I Chiang
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Samantha K Millard
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew J Furman
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, USA; Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, USA
| | - Shuo Chen
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, USA; Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, USA
| | - Siobhan M Schabrun
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - David A Seminowicz
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, USA; Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, USA; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Moukhaiber N, Summers SJ, Opar D, Imam J, Thomson D, Chang WJ, Andary T, Cavaleri R. The effect of theta burst stimulation over the primary motor cortex on experimental hamstring pain: A randomised, controlled study. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2022; 24:593-604. [PMID: 36464137 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Theta burst stimulation (TBS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) is an emerging technique that may have utility in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain. However, previous work exploring the analgesic effects of noninvasive brain stimulation has been limited largely to the arm or hand, despite 80% of acute musculoskeletal injuries occurring in the lower limb. This is a pertinent point, given the functional and neurophysiological differences between upper and lower limb musculature, as well as evidence suggesting that reorganization of corticomotor pathways is region-specific. This study investigated the effect of excitatory TBS on pain, function, and corticomotor organization during experimentally induced lower limb pain. Twenty-eight healthy participants attended 2 experimental sessions. On Day 0, participants completed 10 sets of 10 maximal eccentric contractions of the right hamstring muscles to induce delayed onset muscle soreness. Four consecutive blocks of either active or sham TBS were delivered on Day 2. Measures of mechanical sensitivity, pain (muscle soreness, pain intensity, pain area) function (single-leg hop distance, maximum voluntary isometric contraction, lower extremity functional scale), and corticomotor organization were recorded before and after TBS on Day 2. Pain and function were also assessed daily from Days 2 to 10. Active TBS reduced mechanical sensitivity compared to sham stimulation (P = .01). Corticomotor organization did not differ between groups, suggesting that improvements in mechanical sensitivity were not mediated by changes in M1. Subjective reports of pain intensity and function did not change following active TBS, contrasting previous reports in studies of the upper limb. PERSPECTIVE: M1 TBS reduces mechanical sensitivity associated with experimentally induced hamstring pain. Though further work is needed, these findings may hold important implications for those seeking to expedite recovery or reduce muscle sensitivity following hamstring injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Moukhaiber
- Western Sydney University, Brain Stimulation and Rehabilitation (BrainStAR) Lab, School of Health Sciences, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Simon J Summers
- Western Sydney University, Brain Stimulation and Rehabilitation (BrainStAR) Lab, School of Health Sciences, New South Wales, Australia; Queensland University of Technology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland, Australia
| | - David Opar
- Australian Catholic University, Sports Performance, Recovery, Injury and New Technologies (SPRINT) Research Centre, School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jawwad Imam
- Western Sydney University, Brain Stimulation and Rehabilitation (BrainStAR) Lab, School of Health Sciences, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Thomson
- Western Sydney University, Brain Stimulation and Rehabilitation (BrainStAR) Lab, School of Health Sciences, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wei-Ju Chang
- University of Newcastle, College of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Health Sciences, New South Wales, Australia; Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Centre for Pain IMPACT, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Toni Andary
- South Western Sydney Local Health District, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rocco Cavaleri
- Western Sydney University, Brain Stimulation and Rehabilitation (BrainStAR) Lab, School of Health Sciences, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chowdhury NS, Chang WJ, Millard SK, Skippen P, Bilska K, Seminowicz DA, Schabrun SM. The Effect of Acute and Sustained Pain on Corticomotor Excitability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Group and Individual Level Data. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2022; 23:1680-1696. [PMID: 35605763 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Pain alters motor function. This is supported by studies showing reduced corticomotor excitability in response to experimental pain lasting <90 minutes. Whether similar reductions in corticomotor excitability are present with pain of longer durations or whether alterations in corticomotor excitability are associated with pain severity is unknown. Here we evaluated the evidence for altered corticomotor excitability in response to experimental pain of differing durations in healthy individuals. Databases were systematically searched for eligible studies. Measures of corticomotor excitability and pain were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed to examine: (1) group-level effect of pain on corticomotor excitability, and (2) individual-level associations between corticomotor excitability and pain severity. 49 studies were included. Corticomotor excitability was reduced when pain lasted milliseconds-seconds (hedges g's = -1.26 to -1.55) and minutes-hours (g's = -0.55 to -0.9). When pain lasted minutes-hours, a greater reduction in corticomotor excitability was associated with lower pain severity (g = -0.24). For pain lasting days-weeks, there were no group level effects (g = -0.18 to 0.27). However, a greater reduction in corticomotor excitability was associated with higher pain severity (g = 0.229). In otherwise healthy individuals, suppression of corticomotor excitability may be a beneficial short-term strategy with long-term consequences. PERSPECTIVE: This systematic review synthesised the evidence for altered corticomotor excitability in response to experimentally induced pain. Reduced corticomotor excitability was associated with lower acute pain severity but higher sustained pain severity, suggesting suppression of corticomotor excitability may be a beneficial short-term adaptation with long-term consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nahian S Chowdhury
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wei-Ju Chang
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Samantha K Millard
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Patrick Skippen
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katarzyna Bilska
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David A Seminowicz
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, Maryland; Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Siobhan M Schabrun
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Matthews D, Cancino EE, Falla D, Khatibi A. Exploring pain interference with motor skill learning in humans: A systematic review. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0274403. [PMID: 36099284 PMCID: PMC9470002 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Motor learning underpins successful motor skill acquisition. Although it is well known that pain changes the way we move, it’s impact on motor learning is less clear. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence on the impact of experimental and clinical pain on task performance and activity-dependent plasticity measures across learning and explore these findings in relation to different pain and motor learning paradigms. Five databases were searched: Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane ROB2 and ROBIN-I. The overall strength of evidence was rated using the GRADE guidelines. Due to the heterogeneity of study methodologies a narrative synthesis was employed. Twenty studies were included in the review: fifteen experimental pain and five clinical pain studies, covering multiple motor paradigms. GRADE scores for all outcome measures suggested limited confidence in the reported effect for experimental pain and clinical pain, on motor learning. There was no impact of pain on any of the task performance measures following acquisition except for ‘accuracy’ during a tongue protrusion visuomotor task and ‘timing of errors’ during a motor adaptation locomotion task. Task performance measures at retention, and activity dependent measures at both acquisition and retention showed conflicting results. This review delivers a detailed synthesis of research studies exploring the impact of pain on motor learning. This is despite the challenges provided by the heterogeneity of motor learning paradigms, outcome measures and pain paradigms employed in these studies. The results highlight important questions for further research with the goal of strengthening the confidence of findings in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Matthews
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Edith Elgueta Cancino
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah Falla
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ali Khatibi
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mechanisms and manifestations in musculoskeletal pain: from experimental to clinical pain settings. Pain 2022; 163:S29-S45. [PMID: 35984370 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
15
|
Jadidi AF, Stevenson AJT, Zarei AA, Jensen W, Lontis R. Effect of Modulated TENS on Corticospinal Excitability in Healthy Subjects. Neuroscience 2022; 485:53-64. [PMID: 35031397 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has been reported to effectively alleviate chronic pain, including phantom limb pain (PLP). Recently, literature has focused on modulated TENS patterns, such as pulse width modulation (PWM) and burst modulation (BM), as alternatives to conventional, non-modulated (NM) sensory neurostimulation to increase the efficiency of rehabilitation. However, there is still limited knowledge of how these modulated TENS patterns affect corticospinal (CS) and motor cortex activity. Therefore, our aim was to first investigate the effect of modulated TENS patterns on CS activity and corticomotor map in healthy subjects. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were recorded from three muscles before and after the application of TENS interventions. Four different TENS patterns (PWM, BM, NM 40 Hz, and NM 100 Hz) were applied. The results revealed significant facilitation of CS excitability following the PWM intervention. We also found an increase in the volume of the motor cortical map following the application of the PWM and NM (40 Hz). Although PLP alleviation has been reported to be associated with an enhancement of corticospinal excitability, the efficiency of the PWM intervention to induce pain alleviation should be validated in a future clinical study in amputees with PLP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armita Faghani Jadidi
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP) Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark.
| | | | - Ali Asghar Zarei
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP) Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark
| | - Winnie Jensen
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP) Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark
| | - Romulus Lontis
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP) Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Elgueta-Cancino E, Sheeran L, Salomoni S, Hall L, Hodges PW. Characterisation of motor cortex organisation in patients with different presentations of persistent low back pain. Eur J Neurosci 2021; 54:7989-8005. [PMID: 34719827 PMCID: PMC10138737 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Persistence of low back pain is thought to be associated with different underlying pain mechanisms, including ongoing nociceptive input and central sensitisation. We hypothesised that primary motor cortex (M1) representations of back muscles (a measure of motor system adaptation) would differ between pain mechanisms, with more consistent observations in individuals presumed to have an ongoing contribution of nociceptive input consistently related to movement/posture. We tested 28 participants with low back pain sub-grouped by the presumed underlying pain mechanisms: nociceptive pain, nociplastic pain and a mixed group with features consistent with both. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to study M1 organisation of back muscles. M1 maps of multifidus (deep and superficial) and longissimus erector spinae were recorded with fine-wire electromyography and thoracic erector spinae with surface electromyography. The nociplastic pain group had greater variability in M1 map location (centre of gravity) than other groups (p < .01), which may suggest less consistency, and perhaps relevance, of motor cortex adaptation for that group. The mixed group had greater overlap of M1 representations between deep/superficial muscles than nociceptive pain (deep multifidus/longissimus: p = .001, deep multifidus/thoracic erector spinae: p = .008) and nociplastic pain (deep multifidus/longissimus: p = .02, deep multifidus/thoracic erector spinae: p = .02) groups. This study provides preliminary evidence of differences in M1 organisation in subgroups of low back pain classified by likely underlying pain mechanisms. Despite the sample size, differences in cortical re-organisation between subgroups were detected. Differences in M1 organisation in subgroups of low back pain supports tailoring of treatment based on pain mechanism and motor adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edith Elgueta-Cancino
- Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Liba Sheeran
- Biomechanics and Bioengineering Research Centre Versus Arthritis, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.,School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Sauro Salomoni
- Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Leanne Hall
- Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Paul W Hodges
- Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kandić M, Moliadze V, Andoh J, Flor H, Nees F. Brain Circuits Involved in the Development of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Evidence From Non-invasive Brain Stimulation. Front Neurol 2021; 12:732034. [PMID: 34531819 PMCID: PMC8438114 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.732034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
It has been well-documented that the brain changes in states of chronic pain. Less is known about changes in the brain that predict the transition from acute to chronic pain. Evidence from neuroimaging studies suggests a shift from brain regions involved in nociceptive processing to corticostriatal brain regions that are instrumental in the processing of reward and emotional learning in the transition to the chronic state. In addition, dysfunction in descending pain modulatory circuits encompassing the periaqueductal gray and the rostral anterior cingulate cortex may also be a key risk factor for pain chronicity. Although longitudinal imaging studies have revealed potential predictors of pain chronicity, their causal role has not yet been determined. Here we review evidence from studies that involve non-invasive brain stimulation to elucidate to what extent they may help to elucidate the brain circuits involved in pain chronicity. Especially, we focus on studies using non-invasive brain stimulation techniques [e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), particularly its repetitive form (rTMS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)] in the context of musculoskeletal pain chronicity. We focus on the role of the motor cortex because of its known contribution to sensory components of pain via thalamic inhibition, and the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex because of its role on cognitive and affective processing of pain. We will also discuss findings from studies using experimentally induced prolonged pain and studies implicating the DLPFC, which may shed light on the earliest transition phase to chronicity. We propose that combined brain stimulation and imaging studies might further advance mechanistic models of the chronicity process and involved brain circuits. Implications and challenges for translating the research on mechanistic models of the development of chronic pain to clinical practice will also be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Kandić
- Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Vera Moliadze
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jamila Andoh
- Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Herta Flor
- Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Frauke Nees
- Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sanderson A, Wang SF, Elgueta-Cancino E, Martinez-Valdes E, Sanchis-Sanchez E, Liew B, Falla D. The effect of experimental and clinical musculoskeletal pain on spinal and supraspinal projections to motoneurons and motor unit properties in humans: A systematic review. Eur J Pain 2021; 25:1668-1701. [PMID: 33964047 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Numerous studies have examined the influence of pain on spinal reflex excitability, motor unit behaviour and corticospinal excitability. Nevertheless, there are inconsistencies in the conclusions made. This systematic review sought to understand the effect of pain on spinal and supraspinal projections to motoneurons and motor unit properties by examining the influence of clinical or experimental pain on the following three domains: H-reflex, corticospinal excitability and motor unit properties. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT MeSH terms and preselected keywords relating to the H-reflex, motor evoked potentials and motor unit decomposition in chronic and experimental pain were used to perform a systematic literature search using Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Web of Science, Medline, Google Scholar and Scopus databases. Two independent reviewers screened papers for inclusion and assessed the methodological quality using a modified Downs and Black risk of bias tool; a narrative synthesis and three meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS Sixty-one studies were included, and 17 different outcome variables were assessed across the three domains. Both experimental and clinical pain have no major influence on measures of the H-reflex, whereas experimental and clinical pain appeared to have differing effects on corticospinal excitability. Experimental pain consistently reduced motor unit discharge rate, a finding which was not consistent with data obtained from patients. The results indicate that when in tonic pain, induced via experimental pain models, inhibitory effects on motoneuron behaviour were evident. However, in chronic clinical pain populations, more varied responses were evident likely reflecting individual adaptations to chronic symptoms. SIGNIFICANCE This is a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis which synthesizes evidence on the influence of pain on spinal and supraspinal projections to motoneurons and motor unit properties considering measures of the H-reflex, corticospinal excitability and motor unit behaviour. The H-reflex is largely not influenced by the presence of either clinical or experimental pain. Whilst inhibitory effects on corticospinal excitability and motor unit behaviour were evident under experimental pain conditions, more variable responses were observed for people with painful musculoskeletal disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy Sanderson
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Musculoskeletal Science and Sports Medicine Research Centre, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Shuwfen F Wang
- Graduate Institute and School of Physical Therapy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Edith Elgueta-Cancino
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Eduardo Martinez-Valdes
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Enrique Sanchis-Sanchez
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Bernard Liew
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
| | - Deborah Falla
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cavaleri R, Chipchase LS, Summers SJ, Chalmers J, Schabrun SM. The Relationship Between Corticomotor Reorganization and Acute Pain Severity: A Randomized, Controlled Study Using Rapid Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Mapping. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 22:1312-1323. [PMID: 33367763 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although acute pain has been shown to reduce corticomotor excitability, it remains unknown whether this response resolves over time or is related to symptom severity. Furthermore, acute pain research has relied upon data acquired from the cranial "hotspot," which do not provide valuable information regarding reorganization, such as changes to the distribution of a painful muscle's representation within M1. Using a novel, rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) mapping method, this study aimed to 1) explore the temporal profile and variability of corticomotor reorganization in response to acute pain and 2) determine whether individual patterns of corticomotor reorganization are associated with differences in pain, sensitivity, and somatosensory organization. METHODS Corticomotor (TMS maps), pain processing (pain intensity, pressure pain thresholds), and somatosensory (two-point discrimination, two-point estimation) outcomes were taken at baseline, immediately after injection (hypertonic [n = 20] or isotonic saline [n = 20]), and at pain resolution. Follow-up measures were recorded every 15 minutes until 90 minutes after injection. RESULTS Corticomotor reorganization persisted at least 90 minutes after pain resolution. Corticomotor depression was associated with lower pain intensity than was corticomotor facilitation (r = 0.47 [P = 0.04]). These effects were not related to somatosensory reorganization or peripheral sensitization mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS Individual patterns of corticomotor reorganization during acute pain appear to be related to symptom severity, with early corticomotor depression possibly reflecting a protective response. These findings hold important implications for the management and potential prevention of pain chronicity. However, further research is required to determine whether these adaptations relate to long-term outcomes in clinical populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocco Cavaleri
- Brain Stimulation and Rehabilitation (BrainStAR) Lab, School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lucy S Chipchase
- Brain Stimulation and Rehabilitation (BrainStAR) Lab, School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Simon J Summers
- Brain Stimulation and Rehabilitation (BrainStAR) Lab, School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Discipline of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Jane Chalmers
- Brain Stimulation and Rehabilitation (BrainStAR) Lab, School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Aberrant plasticity in musculoskeletal pain: a failure of homeostatic control? Exp Brain Res 2021; 239:1317-1326. [PMID: 33635391 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06062-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Aberrant synaptic plasticity is hypothesised to underpin chronic pain. Yet, synaptic plasticity regulated by homeostatic mechanisms have received limited attention in pain. We investigated homeostatic plasticity in the human primary motor cortex (M1) of 21 healthy individuals in response to experimentally induced muscle pain for several days. Experimental pain was induced by injecting nerve growth factor into the muscle belly of the right extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle. Pain and disability were monitored until day 21. Homeostatic plasticity was induced on day 0, 2, 4, 6, and 14 in the left M1 using anodal transcranial direct stimulation (tDCS) applied for 7 and 5 min, separated by a 3-min rest period. Motor-evoked potentials (MEP) to transcranial magnetic stimulation assessed the homeostatic response. On days 0 and 14, MEPs increased following the first block of tDCS (p < 0.004), and decreased following the second block of tDCS (p < 0.001), consistent with a normal homeostatic response. However, on days 2 (p = 0.07) and 4 (p = 0.7), the decrease in MEPs after the second block of tDCS was attenuated, representing an impaired homeostatic response. Findings demonstrate altered homeostatic plasticity in the M1 with the greatest alteration observed after 4 days of sustained pain. This study provides longitudinal insight into homeostatic plasticity in response to the development, maintenance, and resolution of pain over the course of 14 days.
Collapse
|
21
|
A novel cortical biomarker signature for predicting pain sensitivity: protocol for the PREDICT longitudinal analytical validation study. Pain Rep 2020; 5:e833. [PMID: 32766469 PMCID: PMC7390594 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PREDICT will undertake analytical validation of a peak alpha frequency and corticomotor excitability biomarker, determining the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy at predicting pain sensitivity. Introduction: Temporomandibular disorder is a common musculoskeletal pain condition with development of chronic symptoms in 49% of patients. Although a number of biological factors have shown an association with chronic temporomandibular disorder in cross-sectional and case control studies, there are currently no biomarkers that can predict the development of chronic symptoms. The PREDICT study aims to undertake analytical validation of a novel peak alpha frequency (PAF) and corticomotor excitability (CME) biomarker signature using a human model of the transition to sustained myofascial temporomandibular pain (masseter intramuscular injection of nerve growth factor [NGF]). This article describes, a priori, the methods and analysis plan. Methods: This study uses a multisite longitudinal, experimental study to follow individuals for a period of 30 days as they progressively develop and experience complete resolution of NGF-induced muscle pain. One hundred fifty healthy participants will be recruited. Participants will complete twice daily electronic pain diaries from day 0 to day 30 and undergo assessment of pressure pain thresholds, and recording of PAF and CME on days 0, 2, and 5. Intramuscular injection of NGF will be given into the right masseter muscle on days 0 and 2. The primary outcome is pain sensitivity. Perspective: PREDICT is the first study to undertake analytical validation of a PAF and CME biomarker signature. The study will determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the biomarker signature to predict an individual's sensitivity to pain. Registration details: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04241562 (prospective).
Collapse
|