Withdrawal of Ventilatory Support at Home on Hospice

Time to death after compassionate extubation in medical and neuroscience intensive care units

BACKGROUND

Medical ICU (MICU) and neuroscience ICU (NSICU) populations undergoing compassionate extubation (CE) may have different characteristics that affect post-procedure outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To contrast clinical characteristics and evaluate time to death (TTD) following CE in MICU and NSICU populations.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective cohort study of patients who completed CE in a MICU or NSICU in 2021. Data were obtained by manual chart abstraction. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare characteristics between the clinical units.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included in the study, 27 were in the MICU and 23 in the NSICU. Median age was 68 years. Patients in the MICU had a longer LOS before CE than those in the NSICU (10.0 vs. 3.0 days, p=0.001). Patients in the MICU experienced a shorter median TTD after CE than those in the NSICU (25 vs. 195 mins, p=0.004). MICU patients had a higher pre-hospital burden of illness (median CCI 6 vs 3, p=0.003), and a higher degree of organ failure at CE (median SOFA 12 vs 6, p<0.001), with more severe hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 149 vs 360, p<0.001). Most MICU patients died of infection or cancer, compared with NSICU patients who had intracranial hemorrhage or ischemic stroke.

CONCLUSION

Patients in the NSICU underwent CE after shorter time in the ICU and survived longer afterwards than MICU patients. Patients in the MICU have a higher pre-hospital severity of illness and a higher level of organ failure at the time of CE compared with NSICU patients.

Palliative Extubation: A Discussion of Practices and Considerations

Palliative extubation (PE), also known as compassionate extubation, is a common event in the critical care setting and an important aspect of end-of-life care.1 In a PE, mechanical ventilation is discontinued. Its goal is to honor the patient's preferences, optimize comfort, and allow a natural death when medical interventions, including maintenance of ventilatory support, are not achieving desired outcomes. If not done effectively, PE can cause unintended physical, emotional, psychosocial, or other stress for patients, families, and healthcare staff. Studies show that PE is done with much variability across the globe, and there is limited evidence of best practice. Nevertheless, the practice of PE increased during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic due to the surge of dying mechanically ventilated patients. Thus, the importance of effectively conducting a PE has never been more crucial. Some studies have provided guidelines for the process of PE. However, our goal is to provide a comprehensive review of issues to consider before, during, and after a PE. This paper highlights the core palliative skills of communication, planning, symptom assessment and management, and debriefing. Our aim is to better prepare healthcare workers to provide quality palliative care during PEs, most especially when facing future pandemics.

Long-term mechanical ventilation and transitions in care: A narrative review

OBJECTIVES

Individuals dependent on long-term mechanical ventilation (LTMV) for their day-to-day living are a heterogenous population who go through several transitions over their lifetime. This paper describes three transitions: 1) institution/hospital to community/home, 2) pediatric to adult care, and 3) active treatment to end-of-life for ventilator-assisted individuals (VAIs).

METHODS

A narrative review based on literature and the author's collective practical and research experience. Four online databases were searched for relevant articles. A manual search for additional articles was completed and the results are summarized.

RESULTS

Transitions from hospital to home, pediatric to adult care, and to end-of-life for VAIs are complex and challenging processes. Although there are several LTMV clinical practice guidelines highlighting key components for successful transition, there still exists gaps and inconsistencies in care. Most of the literature and experiences reported to date have been in developed countries or geographic areas with funded healthcare systems.

CONCLUSIONS

For successful transitions, the VAIs and their support network must be front-and-center. There should be a coordinated, systematic, and holistic plan (including a multi-disciplinary team), life-time follow-up, with bespoke consideration of jurisdiction and individual circumstances.

Palliative Ventilator Withdrawal Practices in an Inpatient Hospice Unit

Background

Palliative ventilator withdrawal (PVW) involves removal of mechanical ventilation in patients not expected to survive to allow a peaceful death. This process traditionally occurs in Intensive Care Units (ICU) and recently has evolved to occur in Inpatient Hospice and Palliative Care Units (IPU).

Objectives

To describe the process and response of patients undergoing PVW in an IPU setting.

Methods

This is a longitudinal observational cohort study of adult patients who underwent PVW in an IPU from January 2021 through March 2022.

Results

Among 25 enrolled subjects, median age was 68 (IQR 62.5-76.5) years and 14 (56%) were females. Median time from PVW to death was 16.8 (IQR 2.6-100) hours. A registered nurse and attending physician were present in all the cases, while a respiratory therapist was present in 20 (80%) and chaplain in 9 (36%) of the cases. Before PVW, opioids and benzodiazepines were administered to 24 (96%) patients. Post PVW, respiratory distress was noted among 16 (64%) patients and medication was given to 15 (60%) patients for respiratory distress. There was a significant association between the presence of respiratory distress and administration of medication within 30 minutes after PVW ( P = .009). The rituals performed during PVW were reciting prayers for 11 (44%), playing music for 8 (32%), and observing silence for 6 (24%) of the patients.

Conclusion

This study describes the PVW practices in an IPU setting where a multidisciplinary team was present during PVW for most of the cases and two-third of the patients undergoing PVW experienced respiratory distress immediately after PVW.

Ventilator Withdrawal in Anticipation of Death: The Simulation Lab as an Educational Tool in Palliative Medicine

Simulation is a growing model of education in many medical disciplines. Withdrawal of mechanical ventilation is an important skill set for palliative medicine practitioners who must be facile with a variety of end-of-life scenarios and is well suited to the simulation laboratory. We describe a novel approach using high-fidelity simulation to design a curriculum to teach Hospice & Palliative Medicine fellows the practical aspects of managing a compassionate terminal extubation. This simulation session aims to equip palliative fellows with a knowledge base of respiratory physiology and mechanical ventilation as well as the practical experience of performing a terminal extubation. We designed a three-hour simulation session which includes a one-hour didactic followed by two hours of simulation, with four cases that focus on different teaching points regarding symptom management and practical aspects of removing the endotracheal tube. The session was designed as an annual session for Hospice & Palliative Medicine fellows in our region during a collaborative educational conference. Based on feedback, the session is scheduled for the beginning of the academic year and each fellow is given the opportunity to physically remove the endotracheal tube. Simulation can be effectively used to teach practical and complex bedside skills such as withdrawal of mechanical ventilation to palliative medicine trainees. This method of teaching could be expanded to teach other advanced hospice and palliative care skills.

Transport Home and Terminal Extubation by Emergency Medical Services: An Example of Innovation in End-of-Life Care

For most terminally ill patients, the preferred place of death is home. Previous literature has demonstrated the feasibility of at-home terminal extubation performed by critical care and hospice physicians. This case report describes a terminal extubation performed by a paramedic under the direct supervision of an Emergency Medical Services physician in the patient's home. Guided by a comprehensive plan and logistical support from a team of hospice providers, a successful out-of-hospital terminal extubation is possible. To truly achieve patient-centered care at end of life, the choice for an out-of-hospital death is necessary.

Palliative care in intensive care units: why, where, what, who, when, how

Palliative care is patient and family-centered care that optimizes quality of life by anticipating, preventing, and treating suffering when “curative” therapies are futile. In the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), critically ill patients receive life-sustaining therapies with the goal of restoring or maintaining organ function. Palliative Care in the ICU is a widely discussed topic and it is increasingly applied in clinics. It encompasses symptoms control and end-of-life management, communication with relatives and setting goals of care ensuring dignity in death and decision-making power. However, effective application of Palliative Care in ICU presupposes specific knowledge and training which anesthesiologists and critical care physicians may lack. Moreover, logistic issues such protocols for patients’ selection, application models and triggers for consultation of external experts are still matter of debate.

The aim of this review is to provide the anesthesiologists and intensivists an overview of the aims, current evidence and practical advices about the application of palliative care in ICU.

Compassionate Discharges From the PICU

OBJECTIVES

This article focuses on compassionate discharge from an ICU setting for pediatric patients.

DATA SOURCES

Not Applicable.

STUDY SELECTION

Not Applicable.

DATA EXTRACTION

Not Applicable.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The rationale for compassionate discharge is described, along with suggestions for assessing feasibility. A patient case highlights the potential benefits of and provides specific examples of steps involved in the process. A general framework for consideration of compassionate discharge, along with a checklist, is provided to highlight the importance of detailed planning and communication.

CONCLUSIONS

Although many children die in an ICU setting, some families desire end-of-life care in a nonhospital setting, often at home. For children dependent on technology, there are considerable logistical challenges to overcome, and it may not always be possible. However, with meticulous planning and close collaboration between intensive care staff, palliative care staff, and other community services, compassionate discharge can be done successfully and provide the child and family the opportunity for end-of-life care in the place most meaningful to them.