1
|
Ma JE, Schlichte L, Haverfield M, Gambino J, Lange A, Blanchard K, Morgan B, Bekelman DB. Do goals of care documentation reflect the conversation?: Evaluating conversation-documentation accuracy. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024. [PMID: 38593240 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Documenting goals of care in the electronic health record is meant to relay patient preferences to other clinicians. Evaluating the content and documentation of nurse and social worker led goals of care conversations can inform future goals of care initiative efforts. METHODS As part of the ADvancing symptom Alleviation with Palliative Treatment trial, this study analyzed goals of care conversations led by nurses and social workers and documented in the electronic health record. Informed by a goals of care communication guide, we identified five goals of care components: illness understanding, goals and values, end of life planning, surrogate, and advance directives. Forty conversation transcripts underwent content analysis. Through an iterative team process, we defined documentation accuracy as four categories: (1) Complete-comprehensive accurate documentation of the conversation, (2) Incomplete-partial documentation of the conversation, (3) Missing-discussed and not documented, and (4) Incorrect-misrepresented in documentation. We also defined-Not Discussed-for communication guide questions that were not discussed nor documented. A constant comparative approach was used to determine the presence or absence of conversation content in the documentation. RESULTS All five goals of care components were discussed in 67% (27/40) of conversation transcripts. Compared to the transcripts, surrogate (37/40, 93%) and advance directives (36/40, 90%) were often documented completely. Almost 40% of goals and values (15/40, 38%) and half of end of life planning (19/40, 48%) were incomplete. Illness understanding was missing (13/40, 33%), not discussed (13/40, 33%), or incorrect (2/40, 5%). CONCLUSION Nurse and social worker led goals of care conversations discussed and documented most components of the goals of care communication guide. Further research may guide how best to determine the relative importance of accuracy, especially in the broad setting of incomplete, missing, and incorrect EHR documentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica E Ma
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Marie Haverfield
- Department of Communication Studies, San José State University, San Jose, California, USA
| | | | - Allison Lange
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Kelly Blanchard
- VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Brianne Morgan
- VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - David B Bekelman
- VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aller A, Shirazi A, Pedell L, Altschuler A, Hauser K, Cheslock M, Wei J, Duffens A, Whitehead H, Lim P, Katzel J, Martinez F, Lin A, Aller S, Aller C, Jones T, Yen SM, Liu R. What Matters Most: The Documented Goals, Values and Motivators of Advanced Cancer Patients. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2023:10499091231223144. [PMID: 38112439 DOI: 10.1177/10499091231223144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Goals of care conversations are essential to delivery of goal concordant care. Infrequent and inconsistent goals of care documentation potentially limit delivery of goal concordant care. METHODS At Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Cancer Center, a standardized documentation template was designed and implemented to increase goals of care documentation by oncologists. The centralized, prompt-based template included value clarification of the goals and values of advanced cancer patients beyond treatment preferences. Documented conversations using the template during the initial pilot period were reviewed to characterization the clinical context in which conversations were recorded. Common goals and motivators were also identified. RESULTS A total of 178 advanced cancer patients had at least 1 documented conversation by a medical oncologist using the goals of care template. Oncologists consistently documented within the template goals of therapy and motivating factors in decision making. The most frequently documented goals of care were "Avoiding Pain and Suffering," "Physical Independence," and "Living as Long as Possible." The least recorded goal was "Comfort Focused Treatment Only." CONCLUSIONS Review of oncologist documented goals of care conversations using a prompt-based template allowed for characterization of the clinical context, therapy goals and motivators of advanced cancer patients. Communication of goals of care conversations by oncologists using a standardized prompt-based template within a centralized location has the potential to improve delivery of goal concordant care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Aller
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Aida Shirazi
- Department of Graduate Medical Education, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Andrea Altschuler
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Karen Hauser
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Megan Cheslock
- Department of Geriatrics Medicine, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Bedford, MA, USA
| | - Jenny Wei
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ali Duffens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hannah Whitehead
- The Permanente Medical Group Consulting Services, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Peggy Lim
- The Permanente Medical Group Consulting Services, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Jed Katzel
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Francisco Martinez
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Amy Lin
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Steve Aller
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Cynthia Aller
- Department of Hematology, Providence Regional Cancer System Lacey Cancer Clinic, Lacey, WA, USA
| | - Tyler Jones
- The Permanente Medical Group Consulting Services, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Sue May Yen
- The Permanente Medical Group Consulting Services, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Raymond Liu
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu A, Giannitrapani KF, Garcia A, Bozkurt S, Boothroyd D, Adams AS, Kim KM, Zhang S, McCaa MD, Morris AM, Shreve S, Lorenz KA. Disparities in Preoperative Goals of Care Documentation in Veterans. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2348235. [PMID: 38113045 PMCID: PMC10731481 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Preoperative goals of care discussion and documentation are important for patients undergoing surgery, a major health care stressor that incurs risk. Objective To assess the association of race, ethnicity, and other factors, including history of mental health disability, with disparities in preoperative goals of care documentation among veterans. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cross-sectional study assessed data from the Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA) of 229 737 veterans who underwent surgical procedures between January 1, 2017, and October 18, 2022. Exposures Patient-level (ie, race, ethnicity, medical comorbidities, history of mental health comorbidity) and system-level (ie, facility complexity level) factors. Main Outcomes and Measures Preoperative life-sustaining treatment (LST) note documentation or no LST note documentation within 30 days prior to or on day of surgery. The standardized mean differences were calculated to assess the magnitude of differences between groups. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were estimated with logistic regression. Results In this study, 13 408 patients (5.8%) completed preoperative LST from 229 737 VHA patients (209 123 [91.0%] male; 20 614 [9.0%] female; mean [SD] age, 65.5 [11.9] years) who received surgery. Compared with patients who did complete preoperative LST, patients tended to complete preoperative documentation less often if they were female (19 914 [9.2%] vs 700 [5.2%]), Black individuals (42 571 [19.7%] vs 2416 [18.0%]), Hispanic individuals (11 793 [5.5%] vs 631 [4.7%]), or from rural areas (75 637 [35.0%] vs 4273 [31.9%]); had a history of mental health disability (65 974 [30.5%] vs 4053 [30.2%]); or were seen at lowest-complexity (ie, level 3) facilities (7849 [3.6%] vs 78 [0.6%]). Over time, despite the COVID-19 pandemic, patients undergoing surgical procedures completed preoperative LST increasingly more often. Covariate-adjusted estimates of preoperative LST completion demonstrated that patients of racial or ethnic minority background (Black patients: OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.77-0.80; P <.001; patients selecting other race: OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.81; P <.001; Hispanic patients: OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.76-0.81; P <.001) and patients from rural regions (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.93; P <.001) had lower likelihoods of completing LST compared with patients who were White or non-Hispanic and patients from urban areas. Patients with any mental health disability history also had lower likelihood of completing preoperative LST than those without a history (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.92-0.94; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study, disparities in documentation rates within a VHA cohort persisted based on race, ethnicity, rurality of patient residence, history of mental health disability, and access to high-volume, high-complexity facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adela Wu
- VA Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Karleen F. Giannitrapani
- VA Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Ariadna Garcia
- VA Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Selen Bozkurt
- VA Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California
- Evaluation Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Derek Boothroyd
- VA Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Alyce S. Adams
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Kyung Mi Kim
- VA Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California
- Office of Research Patient Care Services, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, California
| | - Shiqi Zhang
- VA Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Matthew D. McCaa
- VA Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California
| | - Arden M. Morris
- S-SPIRE Center, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California
| | - Scott Shreve
- Lebanon VA Medical Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Lebanon, Pennsylvania
- Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Karl A. Lorenz
- VA Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|