Sufficient Death Preparedness Correlates to Better Mental Health, Quality of Life, and EOL Care

Predictive model of death acceptance among Thai Buddhist patients with chronic diseases

BACKGROUND

A chronic disease generally leads to a decline in patients' health and shortened lives. This cross-sectional study examined death acceptance and related factors among Thai Buddhists diagnosed with chronic diseases.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 423 patients recruited from five tertiary hospitals in Thailand completed self-reported questionnaires.

RESULTS

Respondents reported a moderately high level of death acceptance, with a mean score of 39.59 ± 6.52 (out of 48.00). Death anxiety, Buddhist practices, Buddhist belief, and self-efficacy explained 28% of the variance of death acceptance (R2 = 0.28; F = 25.27; p < 0.001). Among variables, Buddhist belief was the strongest predictor of death acceptance (β = 0.26, t = 5.74, p < 0.01), followed by death anxiety (β = -0.23, t = -4.84, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Investigation of additional variables is recommended to enhance the model's predictability. Longitudinal studies on how Buddhists' death acceptance changes with disease chronicity are needed to understand this phenomenon fully. Examining whether a causal relationship exists between death anxiety and death acceptance is also recommended.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Peaceful acceptance and struggle with terminal cancer: The role of mindfulness, self-compassion, and body image distress

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the extent to which mindfulness, self-compassion, and body image distress are associated with peaceful acceptance or struggle with illness in terminally ill cancer patients, after controlling for psychological distress, sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, education, marital status), and clinical characteristics (body mass index, Karnofsky Performance Status, time since diagnosis).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 135 terminally ill cancer patients. Participants were consecutively sampled. Two five-step hierarchical regression models were performed, one for peaceful acceptance and the other for struggle with illness. The models included sociodemographic (step 1), clinical characteristics (step 2), psychological distress (step 3), mindfulness and self-compassion (step 4), and body image distress (step 5).

RESULTS

Body image distress was negatively associated with peaceful acceptance after controlling for the other variables. Both body image distress and self-compassion were uniquely associated with struggle with illness, in a positive and negative direction, respectively. The overall models explained 33% of the variance in peaceful acceptance and 61% in struggle with illness.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Targeting body image distress may be important for both enhancing peaceful acceptance and reducing struggle with one's terminal condition. Addressing self-compassion, however, may help patients alleviate the struggle alone. These findings suggest that peaceful acceptance and struggle with illness may follow different clinical pathways with partly different underlying mechanisms. This study provides a foundation for future research to develop interventions for body image and self-compassion specifically tailored to the needs of terminally ill cancer patients.

Patient-caregiver concordance on death preparedness over Taiwanese cancer patients' last 6 months

BACKGROUND

Worldwide patient-caregiver concordance on cognitive prognostic awareness (PA) has been extensively examined, but concordance on sufficient (ie, cognitive and emotional) death preparedness is unexplored. We comprehensively examine the evolution of patient-caregiver concordance on death preparedness over the patient's last 6 months.

MATERIALS/METHODS

This study re-examined data from 2 cohort studies on 694 dyads of cancer patients and their caregivers recruited from a single medical center in Taiwan. Patient and caregiver death-preparedness states were individually identified by latent transition analysis. Patient-caregiver concordance was examined by percentages and kappa coefficients.

RESULTS

No-, cognitive-, emotional-, and sufficient-death-preparedness states were identified for both groups. The no-death-preparedness state reflects neither accurate PA nor adequate emotional preparedness for death. The sufficient-death-preparedness state reflects accurate PA and adequate emotional preparedness for death. In the cognitive- and emotional-death-preparedness states, participants had only accurate PA or adequate emotional-death preparedness, respectively. Prevalence of the sufficient-death-preparedness state increased substantially for patients but decreased slightly for caregivers. Membership in the no- and emotional-preparedness states declined throughout the last 6 months with substantially lower prevalence for caregivers than for patients, whereas the prevalence of the cognitive-death-preparedness state increased. Concordance was poor throughout the patient's last 6 months (percent concordance: 31.6% [95% CI, 24.7%, 38.5%]-43.5% [39.2%, 47.9%], kappa: 0.077 [-0.009, 0.162]-0.115 [0.054, 0.176]) with significant improvement in the last month only.

CONCLUSION

Poor patient-caregiver concordance on death-preparedness states likely reflects the cultural practice of family-consent prognostic disclosure, patients' adjustment for death, and difficulties in patient-caregiver communication on end-of-life (EOL) issues, indicating targets for improving EOL care.

A Model of Death Preparedness in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Grounded Theory Study

BACKGROUND

Death preparedness in patients with advanced cancer is an important prerequisite for improving the quality of death. However, there are insufficient studies on death preparedness in patients with advanced cancer, and the level of death preparedness needs to be further improved.

AIM

To develop a model of death preparedness in patients with advanced cancer.

METHODS

A qualitative approach with grounded theory was used. Data were collected between February 2024 and July 2024 in the oncology wards of the two general hospitals in Wuhan. We recruited 12 patients, 11 family members, 16 nurses and 4 doctors for semistructured interviews. Data analysis included open coding, axial coding and selective coding. The study is reported using the COREQ checklist.

RESULTS

Death preparedness in patients with advanced cancer is a spiralling process whose core components include death awareness, emotional response, hospice programme and reflexive care, and multiple personal, interpersonal and social factors influence it.

CONCLUSION

A model of death preparedness in advanced cancer patients was constructed through rooted theory, revealing its formation and change process. This model deepens the understanding of death preparedness and helps healthcare providers identify patients' preparedness status in advance to provide more targeted support and care. This personalised care enhances patients' quality of life and reduces the psychological burden on them and their families, achieving more comprehensive and humanised end-of-life care.

IMPACT

To better understand patients' death preparedness, healthcare providers should focus on patients' cognitive, emotional, behavioural and social needs in the process of death preparation from a multifactorial perspective, and provide targeted support and assistance. No Patient or Public Contributions were included in this paper.

Death Unpreparedness Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Concept Analysis

The COVID-19 pandemic imposed changes upon the capacity of healthcare systems, with significant repercussions on healthcare provision, particularly at end-of-life. This study aims to analyze the concept map of death unpreparedness due to the COVID-19 pandemic, capturing the relationships among the attributes, antecedents, consequences, and empirical indicators. Walker and Avant's method was used to guide an analysis of this concept. A literature search was performed systematically, between May 2022 and August 2023, using the following electronic databases on the Elton Bryson Stephens Company (EBSCO) host platform: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), Psychological Information Database (PsycINFO), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Complete, Cochrane Library, and Nursing and Allied Health Collection. Thirty-four articles were retrieved. The unexpected and unpredictable impositions associated with inexperience and unskillfulness in dealing with COVID-19 configured challenges for healthcare professionals, family/caregivers, and even the dying person. Nine key attributes emerged in three main domains: (1) Individual: (a) disease-related conditions, (b) separation distress, and (c) scarcity of death and grief literacy; (2) Relational: (a) Dying alone, (b) poor communication, and (c) existential issues; and (3) Contextual: (a) disrupted collective mourning and grieving, (b) disrupted compassionate care and, (c) pandemic social stigma. This study contributed a full definition of death unpreparedness in a global pandemic scenario such as COVID-19. In this sense, feeling unprepared or unready for death brought new challenges to the bioecological resources of those affected. It is essential to embrace strategies capable of providing emotional and spiritual support in the dying process and to respect patient wishes. The lessons learned from COVID-19 should be applied to events with a comparable impact to minimize their consequences.

Factors associated with cancer patients' distinct death-preparedness states

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Facilitating death preparedness is important for improving cancer patients' quality of death and dying. We aimed to identify factors associated with the four death-preparedness states (no-preparedness, cognitive-only, emotional-only, and sufficient-preparedness) focusing on modifiable factors.

METHODS

In this cohort study, we identified factors associated with 314 Taiwanese cancer patients' death-preparedness states from time-invariant socio-demographics and lagged time-varying modifiable variables, including disease burden, physician prognostic disclosure, patient-family communication on end-of-life (EOL) issues, and perceived social support using hierarchical generalized linear modeling.

RESULTS

Patients who were male, older, without financial hardship to make ends meet, and suffered lower symptom distress were more likely to be in the emotional-only and sufficient-preparedness states than the no-death-preparedness-state. Younger age (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.95 [0.91, 0.99] per year increase in age) and greater functional dependency (1.05 [1.00, 1.11]) were associated with being in the cognitive-only state. Physician prognostic disclosure increased the likelihood of being in the cognitive-only (51.51 [14.01, 189.36]) and sufficient-preparedness (47.42 [10.93, 205.79]) states, whereas higher patient-family communication on EOL issues reduced likelihood for the emotional-only state (0.38 [0.21, 0.69]). Higher perceived social support reduced the likelihood of cognitive-only (0.94 [0.91, 0.98]) but increased the chance of emotional-only (1.09 [1.05, 1.14]) state membership.

CONCLUSIONS

Death-preparedness states are associated with patients' socio-demographics, disease burden, physician prognostic disclosure, patient-family communication on EOL issues, and perceived social support. Providing accurate prognostic disclosure, adequately managing symptom distress, supporting those with higher functional dependence, promoting empathetic patient-family communication on EOL issues, and enhancing perceived social support may facilitate death preparedness.