Implementation of Patient Reported Outcomes in Outpatient Palliative Care: From Paper to Computer

Social determinants of health and health outcomes in older cancer survivors

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Today, two-thirds of all cancer survivors are at least 65 years old. Older cancer survivors have complex care needs, and addressing their social determinants of health (SDoH) is critical for improving and managing survivorship outcomes for this uniquely vulnerable population, yet research specifically examining these associations remains limited and emergent. To this end, we describe the emergent body of evidence on the associations between SDoH domains and older cancer survivors' outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the limited investigations of SDoH on the health outcomes of older cancer survivors, there were measures representing all domains of SDoH - health care access and quality, education access and quality, neighborhood and built environment, social and community context, and economic stability. We reviewed another determinant, Digital Environment and Engagement, as they are highly relevant to older cancer survivors' care. Studies primarily investigated outcomes such as the use of or delays in treatment and variables related to care coordination. Generally, poorer access to resources such as income, social networks, and quality health care facilities predicted poorer health outcomes.

SUMMARY

We reviewed studies that revealed that SDoH significantly impacts older cancer survivors' health outcomes. Our description informs future interventions and policies to improve their care.

Implementing paper-based patient-reported outcome collection within outpatient integrative health and medicine

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility of pre- and post-encounter patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure collection within an outpatient integrative health and medicine (IHM) clinic and to characterize factors associated with successful completion.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 27,464 outpatient IHM encounters including 9,520 chiropractic; 8,237 acupuncture; 5,847 massage; 2,345 IHM consultation; and 1,515 osteopathic manipulation treatment encounters at four clinics offering IHM over 18 months. Patients were asked to complete paper questionnaires rating pain, anxiety, and stress from 0-10 immediately pre- and post-encounter. Generalized linear mixed effect regression models were used to examine the relationship between demographic, clinical, and operational covariates and completing (1) pre-encounter and (2) paired (i.e., pre and post) PROs.

RESULTS

Patients (N = 5587, mean age 49 years, 74% white, 77% female) generally presented for musculoskeletal conditions (81.7%), with a chief complaint of pain (55.1%). 21,852 (79.6%) encounters were among patients who completed pre-encounter PROs; 11,709/21,852 (53.6%) completed subsequent post-encounter PROs. Odds of PRO completion were more impacted by provider, operational, and clinical-level factors than patient factors. Covariates associated with increased odds of pre-encounter PRO completion included being female, having additional IHM encounters, and having a pain or anxiety complaint. Covariates associated with increased odds of paired PRO completion included being aged 31-40 vs. 51-60 years and having additional IHM encounters.

CONCLUSION

Implementing a paper-based PRO collection system in outpatient IHM is feasible; however, collecting post-encounter PROs was challenging. Future endeavors should leverage the electronic health record and patient portals to optimize PRO collection and engage patients and clinical providers.

Frequency of vaccine hesitancy among patients with advanced cancer

BACKGROUND

Vaccine hesitancy has become prevalent in society. Vulnerable populations, such as those with cancer, are susceptible to increased morbidity and mortality from diseases that may have been prevented through vaccination.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to determine patient perception of vaccine efficacy and safety and sources of information that influence decisions.

METHODS

This study was a prospective cross-sectional survey trial conducted from March 10, 2022, to November 1, 2022, at a Supportive Care Clinic. Patients completed the survey with a research assistant or from a survey link. Vaccine hesitancy was defined as a response of 2 or more on the Parent Attitudes About Childhood Vaccines (PACV-4). Perception on vaccine safety and efficacy along with the importance of sources of information were determined by a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of the 72 patients who completed the PACV-4, 30 were considered vaccine-hesitant (42%). Of those who completed the survey alone (35), 23 (66%) were vaccine-hesitant; and of those who completed the survey with the help of a study coordinator (37), 7 (19%) were vaccine-hesitant. The most important source for decision-making was their doctor (82%, 95% CI 73-89), followed by family (42%, 95% CI 32-52), news/media (31%, 95% CI 22-41), and social media (9%, 95% CI 4-16). Clinical and demographic factors including age, gender, race/ethnicity, education level, and location of residence were not associated with vaccine hesitancy.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Vaccine hesitancy is present among patients with advanced cancer. The high value given to the doctor's recommendation suggests that universal precautions regarding vaccine recommendation may be an effective intervention.