Impact of Esophageal Atresia on the Success of Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux

Esophago-gastric junction findings on high resolution impedance manometry in children with esophageal atresia

OBJECTIVES

Using high resolution impedance manometry (HRIM), this study characterized the esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) dynamics in children with esophageal atresia (EA).

METHOD

Esophageal HRIM was performed in patients with EA aged less than 18 years. Objective motility patterns were analyzed, and EGJ data reported. Controls were pediatric patients without EA undergoing investigations for consideration of fundoplication surgery.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients (M:F = 43:32, median age 1 year 3 months [3 months-17 years 4 months]) completed 133 HRIM studies. The majority (64/75, 85.3%) had EA with distal tracheo-esophageal fistula. Compared with controls, liquid swallows were poorer in patients with EA, as evident by significant differences in distension pressure emptying and bolus flow time (BFT). The integrated relaxation pressure for thin liquid swallows was significantly different between EA types, as well as when comparing patients with EA with and without previous esophageal dilatations. The BFT for solid swallows was significantly different when compared with EA types.

CONCLUSIONS

We have utilized HRIM in patients with EA to demonstrate abnormalities in their long-term EGJ function. These abnormalities correlate with poorer esophageal compliance and reduced esophageal peristalsis across the EGJ. Understanding the EGJ function in patients with EA will allow us to tailor long-term management to specific patients.

Predictors of anti-reflux procedure failure in complex esophageal atresia patients

BACKGROUND

Anti-reflux procedures (ARP) in esophageal atresia (EA) patients can be challenging and prone to failure. These challenges become more evident with increasing complexity of EA. We sought to determine predictors of ARP failure in complex EA patients.

METHODS

Single-institution retrospective review of complex EA patients (e.g. long-gap EA, esophageal strictures, hiatal hernia, and reoperative ARP) who underwent an ARP from 2002 to 2019. ARP failure was defined as hiatal hernia recurrence, wrap migration/loosening, or need for reoperation. Predictors of failure were evaluated using univariate and multivariable time-to-event analysis.

RESULTS

121 patients underwent 140 ARP at a median age of 13.5 months (IQR 7, 26.5). Nissen fundoplication (89%) was the most common ARP. Mesh (bovine pericardium) reinforcement was used in 41% of the patients. Median follow-up was 3.2 years (IQR 0.9, 5.8); 44 instances of ARP failure occurred (31%), though only 20 (14%) required reoperation. Median time to failure was 8.7 months (IQR 3.2, 25). Though fewer mesh-reinforced ARP failed (21% with vs 39% without, p = 0.02), on multivariable analysis only partial fundoplication (aHR 2.22 [95% CI 1.01-4.78]) and minimally invasive repair (aHR 2.57 [95% CI 1.12-6.01]) were significant predictors of ARP failure.

CONCLUSION

In our practice of complex EA patients, where ARP fail in nearly one third of cases, a Nissen fundoplication performed via laparotomy provided the lowest risk of ARP failure.

Fundoplication in children with esophageal atresia: preoperative workup and outcome

Up to 45% of esophageal atresia (EA) patients undergo fundoplication during childhood. Their esophageal dysmotility may predispose to worse fundoplication outcomes compared with patients without EA. We therefore compared fundoplication outcomes and symptoms pre- and post-fundoplication in EA patients with matched patients without EA. A retrospective review of patients with- and without EA who underwent a fundoplication was performed between 2006 and 2017. Therapeutic success was defined as complete sustained resolution of symptoms that were the reason to perform fundoplication. Fundoplication indications of 39 EA patients (49% male; median age 1.1 [0.1-17.0] yrs) and 39 non-EA patients (46% male; median age 1.3 [0.3-17.0] yrs) included respiratory symptoms, brief resolved unexplained events, typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease, recurrent strictures and respiratory problems. Post-fundoplication, therapeutic success was achieved in 5 (13%) EA patients versus 29 (74%) non-EA patients (P<0.001). Despite therapeutic success, all 5 (13%) EA patients developed postoperative sustained symptoms/complications versus 12 (31%) non-EA patients. Eleven (28%) EA patients versus 3 (8%) non-EA patients did not achieve any therapeutic success (P=0.036). Remaining patients achieved partial therapeutic success. EA patients suffered significantly more often from postoperative sustained dysphagia (41% vs. 13%; P=0.039), gagging (33% vs. 23%; P<0.001) and bloating (40% vs. 17%; P=0.022). Fundoplication outcomes in EA patients are poor and EA patients are more susceptible to post-fundoplication sustained symptoms and complications compared with patients without EA. The decision to perform fundoplication in EA patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease needs to be made with caution after thorough multidisciplinary evaluation.

Predictive factors for fundoplication following esophageal atresia repair

BACKGROUND

One of the most frequent complications after repair of esophageal atresia (EA) is gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Although GERD-associated EA is known to often require anti-reflux surgery, the predicting factors remain unclear. We retrospectively analyzed EA in our institution.

METHODS

Of 65 children with EA treated in our hospital from 1995 to 2018, 45 with Gross C type EA, followed for over 1 year, were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into fundoplication and non-fundoplication groups and compared in terms of their clinical features.

RESULTS

The fundoplication and non-fundoplication groups included 13 and 32 cases, respectively. On univariate analysis, gestational age, body weight, prenatal diagnosis, polyhydramnios, re-do surgery, and gap length of the esophagus differed significantly between the groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Early delivery, low body weight, and a long gap length are, are considered to be risk factors for fundoplication. However, the present study further showed that prenatal diagnosis and polyhydramnios were also significant contributing factors. The presence of a prenatal diagnosis and polyhydramnios may induce preterm delivery, therefore, cases of polyhydramnios due to suspected EA should be managed to prevent early delivery. Better understanding of the postnatal course after surgery is required, especially for prenatal diagnosis cases.

Risk factors for recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease after Thal fundoplication

PURPOSE

The recurrence rate of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after fundoplication has been reported to be 7-25%. We investigated the risk factors for recurrence of GERD after Thal fundoplication (TF) in our department with the aim of further reducing the recurrence rate of GERD.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 276 patients who underwent TF for GERD at our hospital between 2000 and 2019. Retrospectively considered variables were obtained from the medical records of patients. The variables included patient characteristics, GERD severity, surgery-related factors and postoperative course.

RESULTS

The postoperative GERD recurrence rate was 5.8%. In the univariate analysis, the presence of convulsive seizures (12/4 vs. 110/150, p = 0.046) and the absence of a tracheostomy (0/16 vs. 53/207, p = 0.048) at the time of TF were significantly associated with recurrence. In the multivariate analysis, the presence of convulsive seizures at the time of TF was the only factor significantly associated with recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The presence of convulsive seizures and the absence of a tracheostomy at the time of TF were significantly associated with GERD recurrence after TF. Active control of seizures and consideration of surgical indications, including assessment of respiratory status, are important in preventing the recurrence of GERD after TF.

Delayed Diagnosis in Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula: Case Study

BACKGROUND

Timely identification of esophageal atresia is challenging. Diagnosis may be suspected antenatally with a combination of polyhydramnios, associated with a small or absent stomach bubble or other anomalies. Esophageal atresia can be suspected postnatally in the presence of tachypnea, increased oral secretions, and an inability to advance an orogastric tube. Failure to recognize an esophageal atresia can have life-threatening implications.

CLINICAL FINDINGS

A 5-day-old infant with a history of failure to thrive and respiratory distress presented in a community emergency department following a prolonged apnea associated with a breastfeed.

PRIMARY DIAGNOSIS

Delayed postnatal diagnosis of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula.

INTERVENTIONS

During stabilization in the emergency department, a nasogastric tube was placed to decompress the stomach. A subsequent chest and abdominal radiograph identified the nasogastric tube curled in the upper esophagus, confirming an esophageal atresia. The abdominal radiograph demonstrated gaseous distension, suggesting the presence of a distal tracheoesophageal fistula.

OUTCOMES

The neonate had a primary esophageal anastomosis and fistula ligation in a surgical neonatal unit. He was discharged home at 29 days of life.

PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

Understanding the challenges of an antenatal diagnosis and awareness of postnatal presentation with a view to improving postnatal recognition and better-quality outcomes for infants with an esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula.

The burden of esophageal dilatations following repair of esophageal atresia

AIM

To describe the burden of esophageal dilatations in patients following esophageal atresia (EA) repair.

METHOD

A retrospective review was performed at The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, of all neonates undergoing operative repair for EA over a 17-year period (1999-2015). Stricture was defined by radiological and/or intra-operative findings of narrowing at the esophageal anastomosis. Data recorded included EA type, perinatal details, operative approach, esophageal anastomosis outcome, dilatation requirement, and survival. Key endpoints were anastomotic leakage and tension, esophageal dilatation technique, dilatation frequency, fundoplication, and complications.

RESULTS

During the study period, 287 newborn EA patients were admitted, of which 258 underwent operative repair and survived to primary discharge. Excluding 11 patients with isolated tracheoesophageal fistula, 247 patients were included in the final analysis. Intra-operative anastomotic tension was documented in 41/247 (16.6%), anastomotic leak occurred in 48/247 (19.4%), and fundoplication was performed in 37/247 (15.0%). Dilatations were performed in 149/247 (60.3%). Techniques included bougie-alone (92/149, 61.7%), combination of bougie and balloon (51/149, 34.2%), and balloon-alone (6/149, 4.0%). These patients underwent 1128 dilatations; median number of dilatations per patient was 4 (interquartile range 2-8). Long-gap EA and anastomotic tension were risk factors (p < 0.01) for multiple dilatations. Complications occurred in 13/1128 (1.2%) dilatation episodes: 11/13 esophageal perforation, 2/13 clinically significant aspiration. Perforations were rare events in both balloon (6/287, 2.1%) and bougie dilatations (4/841, 0.5%); one patient had a perforation from guidewire insertion.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal dilatation occurred in a majority of EA patients. Long-gap EA was associated with an increased burden of esophageal dilatation. Perforations were rare events in balloon and bougie dilatations.

TYPE OF STUDY

Original article - retrospective review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Intralesional Steroid Injection Therapy for Esophageal Anastomotic Stricture Following Esophageal Atresia Repair

OBJECTIVES

The role of intralesional steroid injection (ISI) in the treatment of anastomotic stricture in patients with esophageal atresia remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ISI.

METHODS

A total of 158 patients with esophageal atresia with at least 1 ISI for the treatment of esophageal anastomotic stricture between 2010 and 2017 were identified. The change in stricture diameter (ΔD) was compared between procedures with dilation alone (ISI-) and dilation with steroid injection (ISI+).

RESULTS

A total of 1055 balloon dilations were performed (452 ISI+). The median ΔD was significantly greater in the ISI+ group: 1 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 0, 3) versus 0 mm (IQR -1, 1.5) (P < 0.0001). The ISI+ group had greater percentage of improved diameter (P < 0.0001) and lesser percentages of unchanged and decreased diameters at subsequent endoscopy (P = 0.0009, P = 0.003). Multivariable logistic regression confirmed the significance of ISI on increasing the likelihood of improved stricture diameter with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.24 (95% confidence interval: 2.15-4.88) (P < 0.001). The ΔD for the first 3 ISI+ procedures was greater than the ΔD for subsequent ISI+ procedures: 1 mm (IQR 0, 3) versus 0.5 mm (IQR-1.25, 2) (P = 0.001). There was no difference in perforation incidence between ISI+ and ISI- groups (P = 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

ISI with dilation was well tolerated and improved anastomotic stricture diameter more than dilation alone. The benefit of ISI over dilation alone was limited to the first 3 ISI procedures.

Predictors of the Performance of Early Antireflux Surgery in Esophageal Atresia

OBJECTIVE

To identify predictors of and factors associated with the performance of antireflux surgery during the first year of life in children born with esophageal atresia.

STUDY DESIGN

All patients were included in a French registry for esophageal atresia. All 38 multidisciplinary French centers completed questionnaires about perinatal characteristics and one-year outcome for children born with esophageal atresia.

RESULTS

Of 835 infants with esophageal atresia born in France from 2010 to 2014, 682 patients, excluding those with long-gap esophageal atresia, were included. Three patients had type I, 669 had type III, and 10 had type IV esophageal atresia. Fifty-three children (7.8%) received fundoplication during the first year of life. The median age at the time of the end-to-end esophageal anastomosis was 1.1 day (range 0-15). Multivariate analysis identified three perioperative factors that predicted the need for early antireflux surgery: anastomotic tension (P = .004), associated malformations (P = .019), and low birth weight (P = .018). Six other factors, measured during the first year of life, were associated with the need for antireflux surgery: gastroesophageal reflux (P < .001), anastomotic stricture (P < .001), gastrostomy (P < .001), acute life-threatening event (P = .002), respiratory complications (P = .045), and poor nutritional status (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastroesophageal reflux disease, low birth weight, poor nutrition, and surgical anastomosis difficulties predicted the performance of antireflux surgery in the first year of life in infants with esophageal atresia.