1
|
Prosenc B, Cizek Sajko M, Kavsek G, Herzog M, Peterlin B. Perception of genomic newborn screening among peripartum mothers. Eur J Hum Genet 2024; 32:163-170. [PMID: 38110644 PMCID: PMC10853238 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01497-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in genomic technology have generated possibilities for expanding newborn screening from traditional procedures to genomic newborn screening (gNBS). However, before the implementation of gNBS, it is crucial to address various aspects, including parental attitudes, at the national level. With this aim, we analyzed the attitudes and expectations of Slovenian peripartum mothers regarding gNBS and the acceptability of its implementation into the Slovenian health system. A questionnaire-based study was conducted on a convenience sample of 1136 peripartum mothers (a response rate of 84.1%) in a hospital setting in Slovenia. We measured participants' level of general genetic knowledge, motivation to undergo gNBS, attitude toward its benefits and drawbacks, willingness to participate financially, and factors that would influence their decision to undergo gNBS. Most participants exhibited a positive attitude (83.2%) and were motivated to undertake gNBS (63.4%). They were willing to share genetic data and also contribute to the testing costs. Mothers with better genetic literacy and higher education level, and those with the familial genetic testing experiences were more supportive of gNBS. However, several emotional and socio-ethical concerns were raised regarding how the genetic information would influence family and social life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernarda Prosenc
- Clinical Institute for Genomic Medicine, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Novo mesto, Novo mesto, Slovenia
| | - Mojca Cizek Sajko
- Clinical Institute for Genomic Medicine, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Gorazd Kavsek
- Clinical Department of Perinatology, The Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Marusa Herzog
- Clinical Department of Perinatology, The Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Borut Peterlin
- Clinical Institute for Genomic Medicine, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Novo mesto, Novo mesto, Slovenia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wright SJ, Vass CM, Ulph F, Payne K. Understanding the Impact of Different Modes of Information Provision on Preferences for a Newborn Bloodspot Screening Program in the United Kingdom. MDM Policy Pract 2024; 9:23814683241232935. [PMID: 38445047 PMCID: PMC10913504 DOI: 10.1177/23814683241232935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction. This study aimed to understand the impact of alternative modes of information provision on the stated preferences of a sample of the public for attributes of newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) in the United Kingdom. Methods. An online discrete choice experiment survey was designed using 4 attributes to describe NBS (effect of treatment on the condition, time to receive results, whether the bloodspot is stored, false-positive rate). Survey respondents were randomized to 1 of 2 survey versions presenting the background training materials using text from a leaflet (leaflet version) or an animation (animation version). Heteroskedastic conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of mode of information provision on error variance. Results. The survey was completed by 1,000 respondents (leaflet = 525; animation = 475). Preferences for the attributes in the DCE were the same in both groups, but the group receiving the animation version had 9% less error variance in their responses. Respondents completing the animation version gave higher ratings compared with the leaflet version in terms of ease of perceived understanding. Subgroup analysis suggested that the animation was particularly effective at reducing error variance for women (20%), people with previous children (16.5%), and people between the ages of 35 and 45 y (11.8%). Limitations. This study used simple DCE with 4 attributes, and the results may vary for more complex choice questions. Conclusion. This study provides evidence that that supplementing the information package offered to parents choosing to take part in NBS with an animation may aid them their decision making. Further research would be needed to test the animation in the health system. Implications. Researchers designing DCE should carefully consider the design of their training materials to improve the quality of data collected. Highlights Prior to completing a discrete choice experiment about newborn bloodspot screening, respondents were shown information using either a leaflet-based or animated format.Respondents receiving information using an animation version reported that the information was slightly easier to understand and exhibited 9% less error variance in expressing their preferences for a newborn screening program.Using the animation version to present information appeared to have a larger impact in reducing the error variance of responses for specific respondents including women, individuals with children, individuals between the ages of 35 and 45 y, and individuals educated to degree level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart J. Wright
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Service Research and Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Caroline M. Vass
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Service Research and Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- RTI Health Solutions, The Pavilion, Towers Business Park, Didsbury, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Ulph
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Service Research and Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shah S, Lou L. Advocacy in neonatology: current issues and introduction to the series. J Perinatol 2023; 43:1050-1054. [PMID: 36725986 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-023-01615-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Advocacy is an increasingly important skill for neonatologists. As social factors play a greater influence on short & long-term newborn outcomes, neonatal physicians must be attentive to policy factors and work to ensure they benefit the health of both patients and the specialty. In this article, we review advocacy issues of current relevance to neonatal practice, including the "Born Alive Executive Order," the "Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act," subspecialty loan repayment and legislation related to donor human milk, as well as introduce topics further discussed as part of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Advocacy Series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shetal Shah
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Maria Fareri Children's Hospital, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
| | - Lily Lou
- Division of Newborn Medicine, Children's Hospital University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van der Pal SM, Wins S, Klapwijk JE, van Dijk T, Kater-Kuipers A, van der Ploeg CPB, Jans SMPJ, Kemp S, Verschoof-Puite RK, van den Bosch LJM, Henneman L. Parents’ views on accepting, declining, and expanding newborn bloodspot screening. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0272585. [PMID: 35980961 PMCID: PMC9387838 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction
The goal of newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) is the early detection of treatable disorders in newborns to offer early intervention. Worldwide, the number of conditions screened for is expanding, which might affect public acceptance. In the Netherlands, participation is high (>99%), but little is known about how parents perceive NBS. This study assessed parents’ views on accepting, declining and expanding NBS.
Methods
A total of 804 of 6051 (13%) invited parents who participated in NBS in the Netherlands during the last two weeks of December 2019, and 48 of 1162 (4%) invited parents who declined participation in NBS in 2019 and 2020, completed a questionnaire.
Results
The most important reason for parents to participate in NBS was to prevent health complaints, whereas the most important reason to decline NBS was parents’ viewpoint on life and the belief that the heel prick would be painful for the child. Compared to NBS participants, respondents who declined NBS were more actively religious, considered alternative medicine or lifestyle more important, were less inclined to vaccinate their child for infectious diseases, and reported more doubt about NBS participation (all differences p < .001). Informed choice was lower among respondents who declined NBS (44%) compared to participants in NBS (83%, p < .001), mostly due to insufficient knowledge. Of the NBS participants, 95% were positive about NBS expansion. Most NBS participants agreed to include conditions that could unintentionally reveal a diagnosis in the mother instead of the child (86%) or a condition that may not cause symptoms until later in the child’s life (84%).
Conclusion
Most participants made an informed decision to participate in NBS and are positive about screening for more conditions. Insights into parents’ views on (non-)participation and expansion of NBS can help to ensure that NBS suits the population needs while safeguarding ethical principles for screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jasmijn E. Klapwijk
- Department of Human Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa van Dijk
- Department of Human Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriana Kater-Kuipers
- Department of Human Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Stephan Kemp
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Laboratory Genetic Metabolic Diseases, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rendelien K. Verschoof-Puite
- Department of Vaccine Supply and Prevention Programmes, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Lion J. M. van den Bosch
- Centre for Population Screening, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Human Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Crossnohere NL, Armstrong N, Fischer R, Bridges JFP. Diagnostic experiences of Duchenne families and their preferences for newborn screening: A mixed-methods study. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS. PART C, SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS 2022; 190:169-177. [PMID: 35943031 PMCID: PMC9804254 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy is the most common form of muscular dystrophy diagnosed in childhood but is not routinely screened for prenatally or at birth in the United States. We sought to characterize the diagnostic experiences of families and describe their preferences for newborn screening (NBS). We conducted a registry-based survey of families with Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy that included open- and closed-ended questions regarding the journey to a diagnosis, preferences for when to learn of a diagnosis, and how knowledge of a diagnosis would impact life decisions. Open-ended responses were analyzed thematically, and closed-ended responses were analyzed descriptively. Sixty-five families completed the survey. The average ages of first concern and diagnosis were 2 and 4 years, respectively. One-third of families (30%) indicated that they would prefer to receive a diagnosis in the newborn period irrespective of treatment options available, and nearly all of the remaining families (93%) indicated that they would want to learn about a diagnosis if there were treatments that worked well during the newborn period. All families (100%) indicated that a diagnosis in the newborn period would impact life decisions. We identified three overarching themes, which described the stages of the diagnostic journey, including having concerns about the child, seeking answers, and receiving the diagnosis. NBS can facilitate improved health outcomes through early access to care, and inform families on major health and nonhealth decisions. The preferences and experiences of families and other stakeholders should be considered when determining the potential value and benefit of expanding NBS programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norah L. Crossnohere
- Department of Biomedical InformaticsThe Ohio State University College of MedicineColumbusOhioUSA,Present address:
Department of Internal MedicineDivision of General Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of MedicineColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Niki Armstrong
- Parent Project Muscular DystrophyWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Ryan Fischer
- Parent Project Muscular DystrophyWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - John F. P. Bridges
- Department of Biomedical InformaticsThe Ohio State University College of MedicineColumbusOhioUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The Value of Cognitive Pretesting: Improving Validity and Revealing Blind Spots through the Development of a Newborn Screening Parent Experiences Survey. Int J Neonatal Screen 2021; 7:ijns7030041. [PMID: 34287256 PMCID: PMC8293165 DOI: 10.3390/ijns7030041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 06/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Surveys are used to gather a range of data on newborn screening (NBS) processes. We describe the development of a survey about parents' NBS experiences, in the United States, informed by cognitive pretest interviews among parents with varying NBS test results (true-positive, false-positive, normal). Cognitive pretest interviews were conducted following a semi-structured script and notes were taken to identify problematic survey items. The study team met weekly to discuss pretest feedback, draft changes, and generate revised items. Pretests indicated that parent experiences with NBS are varied and NBS screening procedures are not well understood. Substantial modifications were made to survey questions concerning NBS testing and result communication. Pretesters often associated NBS with other tests/exams/scales-APGAR scores, Ages and Stages questionnaires, and genetic testing during pregnancy. Some pretesters recalled receiving NBS blood spot results during their hospital admission, an uncommon practice, and few recalled knowing results would be provided to them or their pediatrician in the first few weeks of life. Thorough explanations regarding NBS procedures and expectations were embedded within the survey to enhance and improve interpretation of survey questions. Future NBS experience surveys should utilize cognitive pretesting to capture divergent experiences and improve response validity.
Collapse
|
7
|
Altaany Z, Khabour OF, Al-Taani G. Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes Concerning Genetic Testing Among Young Jordanians. J Multidiscip Healthc 2019; 12:1043-1048. [PMID: 31849479 PMCID: PMC6912010 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s233614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Medical genetic testing is an evolving side of clinical care that helps people to make informed medical and lifestyle decisions. The source of knowledge, personal beliefs, and attitude towards genetic testing are the main determinative factors of getting optimal utilization of such technology in reducing/prevention of diseases. Methods A structured survey was used to assess the knowledge, beliefs, and attitude regarding genetic testing among 463 young adults aged 18 years or older living in the North of Jordan. Results More than three-quarters (77.1%) of the respondents were familiar with the term genetic testing. The most common sources of knowledge were: education they received (44.8%), the internet (37.5%), and social media (17.2%). Most (93.9%) of the respondents believed that genetic testing is a useful tool to diagnose and prevent genetic diseases. Almost three-quarters (72.7%) of the respondents believed that the health care system provides advice or genetic counseling to those with a genetic disease. A total of 9.6% of the respondents thought that genetic testing might cause a physical risk to their lives. In addition, 11.3% of the respondents believed that genetic testing is forbidden and not permissible and about 6.3% did not agree in performing genetic testing in the future. Finally, about half (53.4%) of the respondents consider genetic testing affordable and the remainder consider it costly. Conclusion Our findings emphasize the importance of acquiring knowledge about genetic testing among young individuals, Issues related to knowledge were identified and should be further improved, such as cost prediction, safety, and the legitimacy of genetic testing to get better outcomes in the Jordanian community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaid Altaany
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Omar F Khabour
- Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Ghaith Al-Taani
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vass CM, Georgsson S, Ulph F, Payne K. Preferences for aspects of antenatal and newborn screening: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:131. [PMID: 30991967 PMCID: PMC6469127 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2278-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many countries offer screening programmes to unborn and newborn babies (antenatal and newborn screening) to identify those at risk of certain conditions to aid earlier diagnosis and treatment. Technological advances have stimulated the development of screening programmes to include more conditions, subsequently changing the information required and potential benefit-risk trade-offs driving participation. Quantifying preferences for screening programmes can provide programme commissioners with data to understand potential demand, the drivers of this demand, information provision required to support the programmes and the extent to which preferences differ in a population. This study aimed to identify published studies eliciting preferences for antenatal and newborn screening programmes and provide an overview of key methods and findings. METHODS A systematic search of electronic databases for key terms identified eligible studies (discrete choice experiments (DCEs) or best-worst scaling (BWS) studies related to antenatal/newborn testing/screening published between 1990 and October 2018). Data were systematically extracted, tabulated and summarised in a narrative review. RESULTS A total of 19 studies using a DCE or BWS to elicit preferences for antenatal (n = 15; 79%) and newborn screening (n = 4; 21%) programmes were identified. Most of the studies were conducted in Europe (n = 12; 63%) but there were some examples from North America (n = 2; 11%) and Australia (n = 2; 11%). Attributes most commonly included were accuracy of screening (n = 15; 79%) and when screening occurred (n = 13; 68%). Other commonly occurring attributes included information content (n = 11; 58%) and risk of miscarriage (n = 10; 53%). Pregnant women (n = 11; 58%) and healthcare professionals (n = 11; 58%) were the most common study samples. Ten studies (53%) compared preferences across different respondents. Two studies (11%) made comparisons between countries. The most popular analytical model was a standard conditional logit model (n = 11; 58%) and one study investigated preference heterogeneity with latent class analysis. CONCLUSION There is an existing literature identifying stated preferences for antenatal and newborn screening but the incorporation of more sophisticated design and analytical methods to investigate preference heterogeneity could extend the relevance of the findings to inform commissioning of new screening programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline M Vass
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | | | - Fiona Ulph
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ross LF, Paquette ET. The Complexities of Ascertaining Public Preferences for Newborn Screening Policies. J Pediatr 2018; 201:8-9. [PMID: 30025673 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.06.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|