Steroid Free Treatment of Autoimmune Hepatitis in Selected Children

Various Regimens for Autoimmune Hepatitis in Northern European Children Show Equivalent Outcomes at 1 Year: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the remission rates after 1 year of treatment between two regimens: tacrolimus (with or without prednisolone) or prednisolone (with or without azathioprine) in children with autoimmune liver disease (AILD).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective data from children (n=157) with biopsy-proven AILD in five tertiary northern European centers were included. Data were collected at presentation and after 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Initially, 111 were treated with prednisolone (with or without azathioprine) and 46 received tacrolimus (with or without prednisolone) (median start dose prednisolone: 0.99 mg/kg and 0.43 mg/kg, respectively). At diagnosis, alanine transaminase (ALT) levels were similar, but the rate of advanced fibrosis was significantly higher in the tacrolimus (with or without prednisolone) group. Lower rates of ALT normalization in the tacrolimus (with or without prednisolone) group were found at 3 months (26.8 vs 58.0%, p< 0.001) and 6 months (46.2% vs 68.8, p=0.014), but not at 1 year (68.2 vs. 76.2%, p>0.05). The same pattern was seen for immunoglobulin G.

CONCLUSION

Despite slower treatment response for patients initially started on tacrolimus (with or without prednisolone) at 3 and 6 months, biochemical and immunological responses to the two different regimens appeared equivalent at 1 year after treatment initiation.

Treatment of Autoimmune Hepatitis

The goal of autoimmune hepatitis treatment is to achieve clinical and biochemical remission, which is associated with significantly improved outcomes. Induction treatment with corticosteroids and the subsequent addition of steroid-sparing therapy with gradual tapering of corticosteroids remains the standard of care. Several alternatives to azathioprine and second-line agents, such as mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, sirolimus, or rituximab, have been evaluated in those with intolerance or inadequate response to standard-of-care therapy. Treatment withdrawal is achievable in less than 20% of patients after 2 years of sustained remission. Liver transplantation should be considered in those with progressive liver disease or those with complications such as hepatocellular carcinoma.

Efficiency of azathioprine monotherapy for maintenance treatment of autoimmune hepatitis in children

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a common pediatric liver disease and long-term remission is usually maintained with low dose prednisolone and azathioprine (AZA). The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of AZA monotherapy for maintenance treatment of children with AIH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of the 55 children with AIH. Patients were divided into two groups: combination therapy (CT) and AZA group based on maintenance therapy. Results of these two different maintenance treatments were compared in children with AIH.

RESULTS

The mean age of the children was 10.67 ± 4.30 years (61.8% females) with a mean follow-up period of 46.8 ± 33.6 months. For maintenance treatment, 39 (70.9%) patients received AZA and 16 (29.1%) patients received CT. Relapse was observed in nine (19.6%) cases in the follow-up period; two were in the CT group (2/16; 12.5%) and seven (7/39; 17.9%) were in the AZA group (P = 0.620). In AZA group, the duration of remission was 22.2 ± 6.1 months and that was longer than CT group (P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that AZA monotherapy is an effective and safe therapy for maintaining remission in children with AIH. AZA monotherapy may be used for maintenance treatment of children with AIH, except in cases of overlap syndrome and also to avoid side effects of long-term used steroids and to improve treatment compliance in proper cases.

Azathioprine Monotherapy Is Equivalent to Dual Therapy in Maintaining Remission in Autoimmune Hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Standard of care treatment for AIH includes prednisone monotherapy or dual therapy prednisone-azathioprine. However, many hepatologists alternatively use azathioprine monotherapy to avoid side effects of long-term corticosteroids.

AIMS

To determine whether azathioprine monotherapy is comparable to dual prednisone-azathioprine for maintenance of remission in AIH.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 260 individuals with AIH from a single institution was performed; 45 individuals were included. Exclusion criteria included concomitant PBC or PSC, use of alternative treatment regimen, and/or failure to reach remission. Treatment regimen received was guided by clinician standard of practice, not patients' clinical factors. Initial remission was defined as normalization of serum ALT for at least two consecutive blood draws. Data were analyzed for 5 years post-remission, recording outcome and dose of prednisone and/or azathioprine.

RESULTS

83% of individuals were female, and average age was 65 years. Median dose of prednisone and azathioprine for the dual-therapy group was 5 mg and 100 mg, respectively, while median azathioprine dose for the monotherapy group was 75 mg. Considering overall outcome, 93% of all patients maintained remission. 80% of the dual-therapy group, and 95% of the azathioprine monotherapy group maintained remission. Using Chi-square analysis to compare the maintenance of remission between dual therapy and azathioprine monotherapy, a p value of 0.28 was calculated.

CONCLUSIONS

AASLD guidelines recommend dual prednisone-azathioprine as standard of care for maintenance of remission in AIH. Our results suggest that azathioprine monotherapy is equivalent to prednisone-azathioprine. Azathioprine monotherapy offers a significant advantage in mitigating risks of long-term corticosteroid therapy.