Exposure to prenatal consultation during pediatric surgery residency: Implications for training

"We All Want to Be Able to Tell You Something Hopeful": Clinicians' Experiences Providing Maternal-Fetal Surgery Counseling

INTRODUCTION

Prenatal counseling about maternal-fetal surgery can be traumatic and confusing for pregnant people. It can also be technically and emotionally complex for clinicians. As maternal-fetal surgery rapidly advances and becomes more common, more evidence is needed to inform counseling practices. The objective of this study was to develop a deeper understanding of the methods clinicians currently use to train for and provide counseling, as well as their needs and recommendations for future education and training.

METHODS

We used interpretive description methods and interviewed interprofessional clinicians who regularly counsel pregnant people about maternal-fetal surgery.

RESULTS

We conducted 20 interviews with participants from 17 different sites who were maternal-fetal medicine specialists (30%), pediatric surgeons (30%), nurses (15%), social workers (10%), a genetic counselor (5%), a neonatologist (5%), and a pediatric subspecialist (5%). Most were female (70%), non-Hispanic white (90%), and practiced in the Midwest (50%). We identified four overarching themes: (1) contextualizing maternal-fetal surgery counseling; (2) establishing shared understanding; (3) supporting decision-making; and (4) training for maternal-fetal surgery counseling. Within these themes, we identified key practice differences among professions, specialties, institutions, and regions.

CONCLUSION

Participants are committed to practicing informative and supportive counseling to empower pregnant people to make autonomous decisions about maternal-fetal surgery. Nevertheless, our findings indicate a dearth of evidence-based communication practices and guidance. Participants identified significant systemic limitations affecting pregnant people's decision-making options related to maternal-fetal surgery.

Who needs prenatal counselling with a pediatric surgeon? Experience from a large tertiary care university hospital

OBJECTIVES

To describe our experience with prenatal counselling for surgical anomalies in a large volume center. The secondary aim is to suggest a list of prenatal abnormalities warranting counselling by a pediatric surgeon.

METHODS

We reviewed all prenatal counselling consultations performed by the pediatric surgery team between January 1st, 2015 and December 31st, 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 169 patients or couples had a prenatal consultation with a pediatric surgeon. Prenatal work-up included a fetal MRI in 26% of cases, mainly for digestive and thoracic pathologies (56.1% of cases). Consultation with the pediatric surgeon led mainly to recommendations concerning the place of delivery. Induction for reasons related to the fetal anomaly occurred in 22.2% of cases. Most children were surgically treated within the first year of life (63.5%). Correlation between predicted prognosis and actual status at four years of life was 96.9%. Correlation between prenatal and postnatal diagnosis was 87.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Prenatal counselling by a pediatric surgeon allows couples to obtain clear information on the pathology of their unborn child, giving them greater autonomy in their decision to continue the pregnancy.

Current status of subspecialization in pediatric surgery: A focus on fetal surgery

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Fetal surgery is a growing field within pediatric surgery. We sought to understand practice patterns of pediatric surgeons who subspecialize in fetal surgery.

METHODS

A survey was sent to all active non-trainee surgeons within the American Pediatric Surgical Association. Respondents were stratified based on self-reported fetal affiliations.

RESULTS

Of 1015 surveys, we received 405 responses (40%). Fetal surgery practices were described by 77 self-designated fetal center members. Centers provide prenatal consultation (99%), diagnostic imaging (84%), care/delivery coordination (83%), and/or fetal surgery/procedures (52%). The majority (56%) of fetal programs are directed by surgery and maternal fetal medicine. Pediatric surgeons are represented on the fetal team in 96% of centers. Prenatal consultations are primarily seen by any pediatric surgeon in the group (53%), with the pediatric surgeon on call operating on/caring for the baby postnatally in the majority (64%), regardless of who performed the prenatal consultation. Only 29% of fetal center members performed a fetal operation in the last year. Yearly fetal case numbers vary widely per procedure, with the most common being complex twin procedures and needle-based sclerotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Fetal centers vary by services offered, team composition, and interventions performed, with few surgeons performing a wide range of fetal surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The parental journey of fetal care: a systematic review and metasynthesis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to synthesize the qualitative literature on parental experiences of fetal care to reflect events that happened across the continuum of care and to better understand parents' positive and negative experiences with care delivery.

DATA SOURCES

Eligible studies published until June 2020 were retrieved from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EBSCO CINAHL, Web of Science, and ProQuest.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies must have been: (1) published in English in a peer-reviewed journal or in ProQuest, (2) available in full text, (3) contained a qualitative component, and (4) focused on expectant parents' experiences of tertiary, coordinated, multidisciplinary prenatal diagnosis and care related to a fetal anomaly.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Researchers used the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. A metastudy and an interpretive description approach was taken to synthesize the events that happened across the continuum of care and the themes associated with a positive care experience.

RESULTS

The metasynthesis included 13 studies and 217 patients from 11 different multidisciplinary fetal diagnosis and intervention practices across North America and Europe. We identified key events that influenced parental experience of fetal care across the continuum. The themes associated with a positive care experience are parents (1) gaining understanding and feeling understood, (2) realizing agency and control, and (3) finding hope and meaning. We identified aspects of healthcare delivery that served as barriers or facilitators to these positive experiences.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the commonalities of the parental experience of fetal care across diverse settings creates a foundation for improving care and better meeting the needs of parents undergoing a painful and life-defining event. Although health outcomes are not always positive, a positive experience of care is possible and can assist parents to cope with their grief, manage their expectations, and engage in their care. The findings of this study illustrate the ways in which healthcare delivery can facilitate or obstruct a positive care experience.

Who moved my fellow: changes to Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education fellowships in pediatric surgery and what may be yet to come

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the past 15 years, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has significantly altered the regulatory framework governing fellowship training in pediatric surgery. The daily experiences of pediatric surgical trainees have been impacted by these changes, but training program directors and faculty have not developed a consistent approach to managing this shift. This review highlights the changes, which have occurred, analyzes the current state of fellowship training, and proposes potential strategies for management.

RECENT FINDINGS

The implementation of work hour restrictions, increased supervision requirements, the milestone evaluation program and most recently, enforcement of required critical care experience, have caused significant changes in the curriculum. Pediatric surgical trainees record more total cases, and more minimally invasive surgical (MIS) cases, in particular, than ever before. A subset of this increase may result from trainees performing cases previously assigned to general surgery residents. Teaching cases performed by fellows have decreased. Although the relationship between these shifts in training experience and the didactic curriculum is not clear, we also note that the Pediatric Surgery Certifying Examination failure rate has increased, approaching 20% in recent years.

SUMMARY

It is unclear whether the changes in Pediatric Surgery training programs have been effective, or (conversely) have led to unintended consequences. Paradigm shifts in our training model may be required to address the changes in surgical education and skill acquisition, so that well tolerated, competent and skillful pediatric surgeons continue to enter the workforce.

The National Pediatric Surgery Simulation Program in France: A tool to develop resident training in pediatric surgery

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

To implement resident curriculum in France based on theoretical teaching and bed side training, the national council known as the "Collège Hospitalier et Universitaire de Chirurgie Pédiatrique" examined the relevance and feasibility of systematically introducing simulation program in the pediatric surgery resident training.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A national simulation training program was developed and took place in a 2-day session organized in 7 simulation centers in France. The program included technical (laparoscopic/suturing technique on low-fidelity models) and nontechnical (6 scenarios for standardized consultation, and a team work scenario based on errors prevention in the operative room) skills. Evaluation of the program (Likert scale from 1 (bad) to 5 (excellent) and notation on 20 points) concerned trainees and trainers.

RESULTS

40 residents (95% of all pediatric surgery French residents) attended with a ratio of trainees/trainer of ½. The training objectives earned a score of 4.46/5. The pedagogical value of the seminar scored 4.7/5, teaching quality 17.95/20, and the overall seminar score was 17.35/20.

CONCLUSION

This program, unique nationally, was assessed very favorably by the participating residents and by the involved trainers. To our knowledge, it represents the first mandatory national simulation training program included within a surgical training model.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Expert surgical consensus for prenatal counseling using the Delphi method

BACKGROUND

Pediatric surgeons frequently offer prenatal consultation for congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM) and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH); however, there is no evidence-based consensus to guide prenatal decision making and counseling for these conditions. Eliciting feedback from experts is integral to defining best practice regarding prenatal counseling and intervention.

METHODS

A Delphi consensus process was undertaken using a panel of pediatric surgeons identified as experts in fetal therapy to address current limitations. Areas of discrepancy in the literature on CPAM and CDH were identified and used to generate a list of content and intervention questions. Experts were invited to participate in an online Delphi survey. Items that did not reach first-round consensus were broken down into additional questions, and consensus was achieved in the second round.

RESULTS

Fifty-four surgeons (69%) responded to at least one of the two survey rounds. During round one, consensus was reached on 54 of 89 survey questions (61%), and 45 new questions were developed. During round two, consensus was reached on 53 of 60 survey questions (88%).

CONCLUSIONS

We determined expert consensus to establish guidelines regarding perinatal management of CPAM and CDH. Our results can help educate pediatric surgeons participating in perinatal care of these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Prenatal consultation: perspectives on training, relevance, and utilization among pediatric subspecialty program directors

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the experience and training of house officers in prenatal consultation, and to assess program directors' perceptions regarding adequacy of training, and relevance and utilization of prenatal consultation in their field.

STUDY DESIGN

An online survey was distributed to program directors of all ACGME-accredited programs in the United States in relevant pediatric subspecialties.

RESULTS

Ninety-five percent (142/150) of respondents agreed that prenatal consultation from their field can impact decision-making, yet 46% (69/149) believe their prenatal consult services are underutilized. The majority (56%, 86/152) reported no formal curriculum related to prenatal consultation in their program. Nine percent (14/150) rated their trainees as not adequately trained to perform competent prenatal consultation upon graduation; 35% (52/150) rated trainees as only "somewhat" competent.

CONCLUSION

Our study, the first of its kind, reveals widespread lack of formal training curricula, which may explain the finding that many graduating trainees are perceived as inadequately prepared to perform competent prenatal consultation.