Does timing of gastroschisis repair matter? A comparison using the ACS NSQIP pediatric database

Decreasing Length of Stay for Simple Gastroschisis: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)

BACKGROUND

Gastroschisis (GS) is the most common abdominal defect in infants, yet lack of consensus has led to variations in its management and outcomes. Length of stay (LOS) is an important measure of surgical quality and efficiency in GS infants. LOS depends on clinical and patient-related factors such as simple (sGS) or complex (cGS), type of surgery, associated complications, and factors such as the use of standardized care protocols.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the annual trends in LOS for sGS and identify the predictors leading to these trends.

METHODS/DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of infants with sGS using the 2012-2022 NSQIP-Pediatrics dataset. Predictor variable for LOS was the year of admission divided into five groups. Demographics, preoperative risk factors, and postoperative complications and outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2022, median LOS decreased by five days (30-25 days, p-value= <0.001). We also found that there was a decrease sGS cases in NSQIP dataset (0.34/100 to 0.16/100 infants, p-value= <0.001) was noted. There was an increasing percentage of sGS for Hispanic race, inborn, higher birthweight, and superficial incisional surgical site infection (sSSI), a trend towards increasing gestational age, but no differences in timing of surgery and unplanned readmission. Stratified Cox proportional model analysis revealed that gestational age of <36 weeks, bleeding/transfusions [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.53, p < 0.001] and nutritional support at discharge (HR = 0.27, p < 0.001) were associated with significantly longer LOS.

CONCLUSION

The trends in LOS reduction in sGS infants point towards higher birth weight, later gestational age and more optimal management. It underscores the importance of utilizing national registry databases to better understand the outcomes. Despite these improvements, the observed variations in demographics and outcomes indicate a need for standardized care protocols and a better understanding of the factors influencing LOS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Management of Gastroschisis: Timing of Delivery, Antibiotic Usage, and Closure Considerations (A Systematic Review From the American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes & Evidence Based Practice Committee)

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists for the initial management of infants with gastroschisis.

METHODS

The American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) Outcomes and Evidenced-based Practice Committee (OEBPC) developed three a priori questions about gastroschisis for a qualitative systematic review. We reviewed English-language publications between January 1, 1970, and December 31, 2019. This project describes the findings of a systematic review of the three questions regarding: 1) optimal delivery timing, 2) antibiotic use, and 3) closure considerations.

RESULTS

1339 articles were screened for eligibility; 92 manuscripts were selected and reviewed. The included studies had a Level of Evidence that ranged from 2 to 4 and recommendation Grades B-D. Twenty-eight addressed optimal timing of delivery, 5 pertained to antibiotic use, and 59 discussed closure considerations (Figure 1). Delivery after 37 weeks post-conceptual age is considered optimal. Prophylactic antibiotics covering skin flora are adequate to reduce infection risk until definitive closure. Studies support primary fascial repair, without staged silo reduction, when abdominal domain and hemodynamics permit. A sutureless repair is safe, effective, and does not delay feeding or extend length of stay. Sedation and intubation are not routinely required for a sutureless closure.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the large number of studies addressing the above-mentioned facets of gastroschisis management, the data quality is poor. A wide variation in gastroschisis management was documented, indicating a need for high quality RCTs to provide an evidence-based approach when caring for these infants.

TYPE OF STUDY

Qualitative systematic review of Level 1-4 studies.

Use of a new vertical traction device for early traction-assisted staged closure of congenital abdominal wall defects: a prospective series of 16 patients

PURPOSE

Abdominal wall closure in patients with giant omphalocele (GOC) and complicated gastroschisis (GS) remains to be a surgical challenge. To facilitate an early complete abdominal wall closure, we investigated the combination of a staged closure technique with continuous traction to the abdominal wall using a newly designed vertical traction device for newborns.

METHODS

Four tertiary pediatric surgery departments participated in the study between 04/2022 and 11/2023. In case primary organ reduction and abdominal wall closure were not amenable, patients underwent a traction-assisted abdominal wall closure applying fasciotens®Pediatric. Outcome parameters were time to closure, surgical complications, infections, and hernia formation.

RESULTS

Ten patients with GOC and 6 patients with GS were included. Complete fascial closure was achieved after a median time of 7 days (range 4-22) in GOC and 5 days (range 4-11) in GS. There were two cases of tear-outs of traction sutures and one skin suture line dehiscence after fascial closure. No surgical site infection or signs of abdominal compartment syndrome were seen. No ventral or umbilical hernia occurred after a median follow-up of 12 months (range 4-22).

CONCLUSION

Traction-assisted staged closure using fasciotens®Pediatric enabled an early tension-less fascial closure in GOC and GS in the newborn period.

Gastroschisis: embriology, pathogenesis, risk factors, prognosis, and ultrasonographic markers for adverse neonatal outcomes

Gastroschisis is the most common congenital defect of the abdominal wall, typically located to the right of the umbilical cord, through which the intestinal loops and viscera exit without being covered by the amniotic membrane. Despite the known risk factors for gastroschisis, there is no consensus on the cause of this malformation. Prenatal ultrasound is useful for diagnosis, prognostic prediction (ultrasonographic markers) and appropriate monitoring of fetal vitality. Survival rate of children with gastroschisis is more than 95% in developed countries; however, complex gastroschisis requires multiple neonatal interventions and is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. In this article, we conducted a narrative review including embryology, pathogenesis, risk factors, and ultrasonographic markers for adverse neonatal outcomes in fetuses with gastroschisis. Prenatal risk stratification of gastroschisis helps to better counsel parents, predict complications, and prepare the multidisciplinary team to intervene appropriately and improve postnatal outcomes.

Does time to theater matter in simple gastroschisis?

Objective

A recent publication has suggested that expedited time to theater in gastroschisis results in higher rates of primary closure and decreases the length of stay (LOS). This study primarily aims to assess the impact of time to first management of neonates with gastroschisis on the LOS.

Methods

Neonates admitted between August 2013 and August 2020 with gastroschisis were included. Data were collected retrospectively, and neonates with complex gastroschisis were excluded. Variables including gestation, birth weight, time of first management, primary/delayed closure and use of patch were evaluated as possible confounding variables. The outcome measures were time to full feeds, time on parenteral nutrition (PN) and LOS. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed. P<0.05 was regarded as significant.

Results

Eighty-six neonates were identified, and 16 were then excluded (eight patients with complex gastroschisis, eight patients with time to first management not documented). The median LOS for those who underwent primary closure was 21 days (interquartile range (IQR) =16-29) and for those who underwent silo placement and delayed closure was 59 days (IQR=44-130). The mean time to first management was 473 min (standard deviation (SD) =146 min), with only 20% of these infants being operated on at less than 6 hours of age. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated no relationship between time to first management and LOS (r2=0.00, p=0.82) but did demonstrate a consistent positive association between time to first feed and LOS and delayed closure, resulting in a longer time to full feeds and a longer time on PN.

Conclusions

The time to first management was not associated with a change in LOS in these data. Further prospective evaluation of the impact of reducing the time to first feed on the LOS is recommended.

Level of evidence

IV.

Therapeutic Hypothermia Treatment for an Infant with Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy and Gastroschisis: A Case Report

Gastroschisis is a congenital, typically isolated, full-thickness abdominal wall defect in which the abdominal contents, usually only the small intestine, remain outside the abdominal cavity. It is commonly detected on fetal ultrasonography, and has generally excellent survival and outcomes, though these can be decreased in cases of complicated gastroschisis. We present the case of a female infant with a prenatal diagnosis of gastroschisis who required a prolonged and complex resuscitation after delivery. In addition to her gastroschisis, she presented with a history and physical examination consistent with severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and was treated with therapeutic hypothermia (TH) without further compromise to her bowel. In addition, careful consideration of neuroprotection, fluid status, bowel viability, and hemodynamics were undertaken in her care. She was discharged home on full enteral feeds, with only mild language and gross motor delays at 6 months of age. To our knowledge, there are no reports in the literature of the use of TH in the setting of unrepaired simple gastroschisis.

Hospital Variation in Surgical Technique for Repair of Uncomplicated Gastroschisis

Practices in surgical repair of uncomplicated gastroschisis are varied. Data regarding hospital volume, surgical technique, clinical outcomes, and costs remain limited. Neonatal patients with uncomplicated gastroschisis were identified using the 2015-2019 National Readmissions Database. Hospital volume tertiles were determined, and sutureless or fascial repair techniques were enumerated. High volume centers (HVC) comprised the top tertile. Hospital-level variability in surgical technique was determined. Adjusted multivariable analysis was performed to compare clinical outcomes and costs among HVC and lower-volume centers and among repair techniques. Of an estimated 2903 hospitalizations meeting inclusion criteria, 23.5% occurred at HVC. There was 42.4% variation among sutureless and fascial repair techniques across all hospitals. Among HVC and lower-volume centers, there were no significant differences in rates of 30-day readmission or complication; however, HVC were associated with greater cost and length of stay. Those with codes for fascial repair technique experienced greater lengths of stay, costs, and rates of complication. Codes for surgical repair technique for uncomplicated gastroschisis vary widely, while outcomes are equivalent across strata of hospital volume. Those with codes for sutureless technique were associated with favorable clinical outcomes, irrespective of hospital volume. Guidelines for management of uncomplicated gastroschisis should account for hospital volume, variation in technique, outcomes, and resource utilization.

Implementing a standardized gastroschisis protocol significantly increases the rate of primary sutureless closure without compromising closure success or early clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

Standardized protocols have been shown to improve outcomes in several pediatric surgical conditions. We implemented a multi-disciplinary gastroschisis practice bundle at our institution in 2013. We sought to evaluate its impact on closure type and early clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of uncomplicated gastroschisis patients treated at our institution between 2008-2019. Patients were divided into two groups: pre- and post-protocol implementation. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare closure location, method, and success.

RESULTS

Neonates (pre-implementation n = 53, post-implementation n = 43) were similar across baseline variables. Successful immediate closure rates were comparable (75.5% vs. 72.1%, p = 0.71). The proportion of bedside closures increased significantly after protocol implementation (35.3% vs. 95.4%, p < 0.01), as did the proportion of sutureless closures (32.5% vs. 71.0%, p < 0.01). Median postoperative mechanical ventilation decreased significantly (4 days IQR [3, 5] vs. 2 days IQR [1, 3], p < 0.01). Postoperative complications and duration of parenteral nutrition were equivalent. After controlling for potential confounding, infants in the post-implementation group had a 44.0 times higher odds of undergoing bedside closure (95% CI: 9.0, 215.2, p < 0.01) and a 7.7 times higher odds of undergoing sutureless closure (95% CI: 2.3, 25.1, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing a standardized gastroschisis protocol significantly increased the proportion of immediate bedside sutureless closures and decreased the duration of mechanical ventilation, without increasing postoperative complications. Level of Evidence III Type of Study Retrospective comparative study.

The medical and surgical management of gastroschisis

Gastroschisis (GS) is a full-thickness abdominal wall defect in which fetal intestine herniates alongside the umbilical cord into the intrauterine cavity, resulting in an intestinal injury of variable severity. An increased prevalence of gastroschisis has been observed across several continents and is a focus of epidemiologic study. Prenatal diagnosis of GS is common and allows for delivery planning and treatment in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) by collaborative interdisciplinary teams (neonatology, neonatal nursing and pediatric surgery). Postnatal treatment focuses on closure of the defect, optimized nutrition, complication avoidance and a timely transition to enteral feeding. Babies born with complex GS are more vulnerable to complications, have longer and more resource intensive hospital stays and benefit from standardized care pathways provided by teams with expertise in managing infants with intestinal failure. This article will review the current state of knowledge related to the medical and surgical management and outcomes of gastroschisis with a special focus on the role of the neonatologist in supporting integrated team-based care.

Gastroschisis: A Successful, Prospectively Evaluated Treatment Model in a Middle-Income Country

BACKGROUND

This research adopted a care protocol from high-income countries in a level II/III hospital in a middle-income country to decrease morbidity and mortality associated with gastroschisis.

METHODS

We established a multidisciplinary protocol to treat patients with gastroschisis prospectively from November 2012 to November 2018. This included prenatal diagnosis, presence of a neonatologist and pediatric surgeon at birth, and either performing primary closure on the patients with an Apgar score of 8/9, mild serositis, and no breathing difficulty or placing a preformed silo, when unable to fulfill these criteria, under sedation and analgesia (no intubation) in the operating room or at the patients' bedside. The subsequent management took place in the neonatal intensive care unit. The data were analyzed through the Mann-Whitney and Student's t-distribution for the two independent samples; the categorical variables were analyzed through a chi-square distribution or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

In total, 55 patients were included in the study: 33 patients (60%) were managed with a preformed silo, whereas 22 patients (40%) underwent primary closure. Prenatal diagnosis (P = 0.02), birth at the main hospital (P = 0.02), and the presence of a pediatric surgeon at birth (P = 0.04) were associated with successful primary closure. The primary closure group had fewer fasting days (P < 0.001) and a shorter neonatal intensive care unit length of stay (P = 0.025). The survival rate was 92.7% (51 patients).

CONCLUSION

The treatment model modified to fit the means of our hospital proved successful.

Failure of primary closure predicts prolonged length of stay in gastroschisis patients

PURPOSE

Current literature regarding outcomes of gastroschisis closure methods do not highlight differences in patients who successfully undergo primary closure with those who fail and require silo placement. We hypothesize that failure of primary closure has significant effects on clinical outcomes such as length of stay and time to enteral feeding.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review between 2009 and 2018 of gastroschisis patients at a tertiary pediatric referral hospital. We compared patients successfully undergoing primary closure to patients who failed an initial primary closure attempt. Bivariate and multivariate linear regression models were used to assess the association of closure method on clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight neonates were included for analysis, with 44 patients who underwent primary closure and 24 who failed primary closure. On multivariate regression analysis, primary closure patients had shorter estimated time to starting and to full enteral feeds and decreased LOS as compared to those who failed primary closure. Two patients (4.44%) had complications related to primary closure.

CONCLUSION

Patients able to undergo primary closure for gastroschisis were more likely to have a shorter length of stay, shorter time to enteral feeds, and use much fewer medical resources. Initial primary closure is a safe method for most patients.

Estimating Length of Stay for Simple Gastroschisis

BACKGROUND

Length of stay (LOS) is an important measure of quality; however, estimating LOS for rare populations such as gastroschisis is problematic. Our objective was to identify explanatory variables for LOS and build a model to estimate LOS in neonates with simple gastroschisis.

METHODS

In 73 neonates with simple gastroschisis (47% female, 67% White), statistical correlations for 31 potential explanatory variables for LOS were evaluated using multivariate linear regression. Poisson regression was used to estimate LOS in predetermined subpopulations, and a life table model was developed to estimate LOS for simple gastroschisis.

RESULTS

Female sex (-2.4 d), "time to silo placement" (0.9 d), total parenteral nutrition days (0.6 d), need for any nasogastric feedings (11.4 d) and at discharge (-7 d), "feeding tolerance" (0.4 d), days to first postoperative stool (-0.3 d), and human milk exposure (-3.4 d) associated with LOS in simple gastroschisis. Estimated LOS for preterm neonates was longer than term infants (5.4 versus 4.6 wk) but similar for estimates based on sex and race. Based on these associations, we estimate that >50% of neonates with simple gastroschisis will be discharged by hospital day 35.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified several associations that explained variations in LOS and developed a novel model to estimate LOS in simple gastroschisis, which may be applied to other rare populations.

Antibiotic Utilization and Infection Among Infants with Abdominal Wall Defects

BACKGROUND

Neonates with abdominal wall defects are at an increased infection risk because of the defect itself and prolonged neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stays. Antibiotic prophylaxis until closure of the defect is common. However, infection risk and antibiotic use have not been well quantified in these infants.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of infants with abdominal wall defects (gastroschisis and omphalocele) admitted to a single-center NICU from 2007 to 2018. Demographic and clinical information, including microbiologic studies, antibiotic dosing and surgical care, were collected. Antibiotic use was quantified using days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days. Sepsis was defined as culture of a pathogen from a normally sterile site.

RESULTS

Seventy-four infants were included; 64 (86%) with gastroschisis and 10 (14%) with omphalocele. Median day of closure was 8 days [interquartile range (IQR) 6-10, range 0-31]. All infants received ≥1 course of antibiotics; median antibiotic DOT/infant was 24.5 (IQR 18-36) for an average of 416.5 DOT per 1000 patient-days. Most antibiotic use was preclosure prophylaxis (44%) and treatment of small intestinal bowel overgrowth (24%). Suspected and proven infection accounted for 26% of all antibiotic use. Skin and soft tissue infection (13/74, 18%) and late-onset sepsis (11/74, 15%) were the most common infections; 2 infants had sepsis while on antibiotic prophylaxis. All infants survived to discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Most antibiotic use among infants with abdominal wall defects was prophylactic. Infection on prophylaxis was rare, but 35% of infants had infection after prophylaxis. Improved stewardship strategies are needed for these high-risk infants.

Is there a role for fetal interventions in gastroschisis management? - An updated comprehensive review

We conducted a comprehensive evidence-based review on the epidemiology and current standard of care of gastroschisis management as well as the pathophysiology, rationale and feasibility of fetal therapy as a viable alternative. Gastroschisis is a periumbilical abdominal wall defect characterized by abdominal viscera herniation in utero. It affects 4 in 10 000 live births, but the prevalence has steadily increased in recent years. Gastroschisis is typically diagnosed on routine second-trimester ultrasound. The overall prognosis is favorable, but complex gastroschisis, which accounts for about 10% to 15% of cases, is associated with a higher mortality, significant disease burden and higher healthcare costs due to long- and short-term complications. The current standard of care has yet to be established but generally involves continued fetal surveillance and multidisciplinary perinatal care. Postnatal surgical repair is achieved with primary closure, staged silo closure or sutureless repair. Experimental animal studies have demonstrated the feasibility of in utero closure, antiinflammatory therapy and prenatal regenerative therapy. However, reports of early preterm delivery and amnioinfusion trials have failed to show any benefit in humans. Further experimental studies and human trials are necessary to demonstrate the potential benefit of fetal therapy in gastroschisis.

Effects of gestational age at delivery and type of labor on neonatal outcomes among infants with gastroschisis†

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of preterm gestational age (GA) on neonatal outcomes of gastroschisis and to compare the neonatal outcomes after spontaneous labor versus iatrogenic delivery both in the preterm and early term gestational periods.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study of prenatally diagnosed gastroschisis cases born at Loma Linda University Medical Center and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (Loma Linda, CA) between January 2009 and October 2016. A total of 194 prenatally diagnosed gastroschisis cases were identified and included in the analysis. We compared infants delivered <37 0/7 to those ≥37 0/7 weeks' gestation. Adverse neonatal outcome was defined as any of: sepsis, short bowel syndrome, prolonged ventilation, or death. Prolonged length of stay (LOS) was defined as ≥75th percentile value. Outcomes following spontaneous versus iatrogenic delivery were compared. Analyses were performed using chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, and Student's t-test or Wilcoxon's rank-sum test for continuous variables.

RESULTS

One hundred and six neonates were born <37 weeks and 88 at ≥37 weeks. Adverse outcome was statistically similar among those born <37 weeks compared to ≥37 weeks (48 versus 34%, p = .07). Prolonged LOS was more frequent among neonates delivered <37 weeks (p = .03). Among neonates born <37 weeks, bowel atresia was more frequent in those with spontaneous versus iatrogenic delivery (p = .04). There was no significant difference in the adverse neonatal composite outcome between those with spontaneous preterm labor versus planned iatrogenic delivery at <37 weeks (n = 30 (58%) versus n = 21 (39%), p = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

Neonates with gastroschisis delivered <37 weeks had prolonged LOS whereas the rate of adverse neonatal outcomes was similar between those delivered preterm versus term. Neonates born after spontaneous preterm labor had a higher rate of bowel atresia compared to those born after planned iatrogenic preterm delivery.

Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection in Neonates: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: Surgical site infections (SSI) contribute to postoperative morbidity and mortality in children. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence and identify risk factors for SSI in neonates. Methods: Using a defined strategy, three investigators searched articles on neonatal SSI published since 2000. Studies on neonates and/or patients admitted to neonatal intensive care unit following cervical/thoracic/abdominal surgery were included. Risk factors were identified from comparative studies. Meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using RevMan 5.3. Data are (mean ± SD) prevalence. Results: Systematic review-of 885 abstracts screened, 48 studies (27,760 neonates) were included. The incidence of SSI was 5.6% (1,564 patients). SSI was more frequent in males (61.8%), premature babies (77.4%), and following gastrointestinal surgery (95.4%). Meta-analysis-10 comparative studies (16,442 neonates; 946 SSI 5.7%) showed that predictive factors for SSI development were gestational age, birth weight, age at surgery, length of surgical procedure, number of procedure per patient, length of preoperative hospital stay, and preoperative sepsis. Conversely, preoperative antibiotic use was not significantly associated with development of SSI. Conclusions: Younger neonates and those undergoing abdominal procedures are at higher risk for SSI. Given the lack of evidence-based literature, prospective studies may help determine the risk factors for SSI in neonates.

Single center protocol driven care in 150 patients with gastroschisis 1998-2017: collaboration improves results

PURPOSE

The treatment of gastroschisis (GS) using our collaborative clinical pathway, with immediate attempted abdominal closure and bowel irrigation with a mucolytic agent, was reviewed.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the past 20 years of our clinical pathway was performed on neonates with GS repair at our institution. The clinical treatment includes attempted complete reduction of GS defect within 2 h of birth. In the operating room, the bowel is evaluated and irrigated with mucolytic agent to evacuate the meconium and decompress the bowel. No incision is made and a neo-umbilicus is created. Clinical outcomes following closure were assessed.

RESULTS

150 babies with gastroschisis were reviewed: 109 (77%) with a primary repair, 33 (23%) with a spring-loaded silo repair. 8 babies had a delayed closure and were not included in the statistical analysis. Successful primary repair and time to closure had a significant relationship with all outcome variables-time to extubation, days to initiate feeds, days to full feeds, and length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Early definitive closure of the abdominal defect with mucolytic bowel irrigation shortens time to first feeds, total TPN use, time to extubation, and length of stay.

Closure methods in gastroschisis

The expected outcome of gastroschisis has evolved from an almost certain death of the child prior to the use of parenteral nutrition to almost certain survival. The primary goal of the surgical intervention is return of eviscerated contents into the abdominal cavity. The optimal surgical technique is dependent on the status of the intestine and the accommodation of abdominal domain. In this review, the various surgical techniques for management are discussed as they have evolved. Ironically, a minimalist surgical intervention originally practiced due to the poor expected outcome is now being adopted as a minimalist surgical approach for abdominal wall closure associated with an expected excellent outcome.

Trends in incidence and outcomes of gastroschisis in the United States: analysis of the national inpatient sample 2010-2014

PURPOSE

Gastroschisis is a severe congenital anomaly associated with a significant morbidity and mortality. There are limited temporal trend data on incidence, mortality, length of stay, and hospital cost of gastroschisis. Our aim was to study these temporal trends using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS).

METHODS

We identified all neonatal admissions with a diagnosis of gastroschisis within the NIS from 2010 through 2014. We limited admission age to ≤ 28 days and excluded all those transferred to other hospitals. We estimated gastroschisis incidence, mortality, length of hospital stay, and cost of hospitalization. For continuous variables, trends were analyzed using survey regression. Cochrane-Armitage trend test was used to analyze trends for categorical variables. P < 0.05 was considered as significant.

RESULTS

The incidence of gastroschisis increased from 4.5 to 4.9/10,000 live births from 2010 through 2014 (P = 0.01). Overall mortality was 3.5%, median length of stay was 35 days (95% CI 26-55 days), and median cost of hospitalization was $75,859 (95% CI $50,231-$122,000). After adjusting for covariates, there was no statistically significant change in mortality (OR = 1.13; 95% CI 0.87-1.48), LOS (β = - 2.1 ± 3.5; 95% CI - 9.0 to 4.8) and hospital cost (β = - 2.137 ± 10.813; 95% CI - 23,331 to 19,056) with each calendar year increase on multivariate logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of neonates with gastroschisis increased between 2010 and 2014. Incidence was highest in the West. No difference in mortality and resource utilization was observed.

Understanding gastroschisis and its clinical management: where are we?

Gastroschisis is the commonest developmental defect of the anterior abdominal wall in both developed and developing countries. The past 30 years have seen transformational improvements in outcome due to advances in neonatal intensive care and enhanced integration between the disciplines of maternal fetal medicine, neonatology and pediatric surgery. A review of gastroschisis, which emphasizes its epidemiology, multidisciplinary care strategies and contemporary outcomes is timely. Areas covered: This review discusses the current state of knowledge related to prevalence and causation, and postulated embryopathologic mechanisms contributing to the development of gastroschisis. Using relevant, current literature with an emphasis on high level evidence where it exists, we review modern techniques of prenatal diagnosis, pre and postnatal risk stratification, preferred timing and method of delivery, options for abdominal wall closure, nutritional management, and short and long term clinical and neurodevelopmental follow-up. Expert commentary: This section explores controversies in contemporary management which contribute to practice and cost variation and discusses the benefits of novel nutritional therapies and care standardization that target unnecessary practice variation and improve overall cost-effectiveness of gastroschisis care. The commentary concludes with a review of fertile areas of gastroschisis research, which represent opportunities for knowledge synthesis and further outcome improvement.