Esophageal substitution or esophageal elongation procedures in patients with complicated esophageal atresia? Results of a comparative study

Variability in the Reporting of Baseline Characteristics, Treatment, and Outcomes in Esophageal Atresia Publications: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

 As survival rates of infants born with esophageal atresia (EA) have improved considerably, research interests are shifting from viability to morbidity and longer-term outcomes. This review aims to identify all parameters studied in recent EA research and determine variability in their reporting, utilization, and definition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Following PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic review of literature regarding the main EA care process, published between 2015 and 2021, combining the search term "esophageal atresia" with "morbidity," "mortality," "survival," "outcome," or "complication." Described outcomes were extracted from included publications, along with study and baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

 From 209 publications that met the inclusion criteria, 731 studied parameters were extracted and categorized into patient characteristics (n = 128), treatment and care process characteristics (n = 338), and outcomes (n = 265). Ninety-two of these were reported in more than 5% of included publications. Most frequently reported characteristics were sex (85%), EA type (74%), and repair type (60%). Most frequently reported outcomes were anastomotic stricture (72%), anastomotic leakage (68%), and mortality (66%).

CONCLUSION

 This study demonstrates considerable heterogeneity of studied parameters in EA research, emphasizing the need for standardized reporting to compare results of EA research. Additionally, the identified items may help develop an informed, evidence-based consensus on outcome measurement in esophageal atresia research and standardized data collection in registries or clinical audits, thereby enabling benchmarking and comparing care between centers, regions, and countries.

Postoperative morbidity and health-related quality of life in children with delayed reconstruction of esophageal atresia: a nationwide Swedish study

BACKGROUND

In 10-15% of children with esophageal atresia (EA) delayed reconstruction of esophageal atresia (DREA) is necessary due to long-gap EA and/or prematurity/low birth weight. They represent a patient subgroup with high risk of complications. We aimed to evaluate postoperative morbidity and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in a Swedish national cohort of children with DREA.

METHODS

Postoperative morbidity, age-specific generic HRQOL (PedsQL^™ 4.0) and condition-specific HRQOL (The EA-QOL questionnaires) in children with DREA were compared with children with EA who had primary anastomosis (PA). Factors associated with the DREA group's HRQOL scores were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U-test and Spearman's rho. Clinical data was extracted from the medical records. Significance level was p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Thirty-four out of 45 families of children with DREA were included and 30 returned the questionnaires(n = 8 children aged 2-7 years; n = 22 children aged 8-18 years). Compared to children with PA(42 children aged 2-7 years; 64 children aged 8-18 years), there were no significant differences in most early postoperative complications. At follow-up, symptom prevalence in children aged 2-7 with DREA ranged from 37.5% (heartburn) to 75% (cough). Further digestive and respiratory symptoms were present in ≥ 50%. In children aged 8-18, it ranged from 14.3% (vomiting) to 40.9% (cough), with other digestive and airway symptoms present in 19.0-27.3%. Except for chest tightness (2-7 years), there were no significant differences in symptom prevalence between children with DREA and PA, nor between their generic or condition-specific HRQOL scores (p > 0.05). More children with DREA underwent esophageal dilatations (both age groups), gastrostomy feeding (2-7 years), and antireflux treatment (8-18 years), p < 0.05. Days to hospital discharge after EA repair and a number of associated anomalies showed a strong negative correlation with HRQOL scores (2-7 years). Presence of cough, airway infection, swallowing difficulties and heartburn were associated with lower HRQOL scores (8-18 years), p < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Although children with DREA need more treatments, they are not a risk group for postoperative morbidity and impaired HRQOL compared with children with PA. However, those with a long initial hospital stay, several associated anomalies and digestive or respiratory symptoms risk worse HRQOL. This is important information for clinical practice, families and patient stakeholders.

Diagnostic Value of Prenatal Ultrasound Parameters and Esophageal Signs in Pouch and Lower Thoracic Segment in Fetuses with Esophageal Atresia

In order to investigate the diagnostic value of prenatal ultrasound parameters and signs of pouch and lower thoracic esophagus in the fetus with esophageal atresia (EA), the prenatal ultrasound data of 35 EA fetuses (observation group) confirmed by autopsy after induced labor or postnatal surgery and imaging examination in our hospital from May 2019 to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 35 normal postnatal fetuses (control group). General information and prenatal ultrasound parameters of the two groups, including head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), double parietal diameter (BPD), fetal body weight (EFW), and signs (small or unmanifested gastric vesicles, amniotic fluid, neck or upper chest pouch, lower chest esophagus not visible), were analyzed using logistic regression. The logistic multifactor regression model for EA diagnosis was established, and the diagnostic value for EA was analyzed. As a result, the HC, AC, and EFW of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, the gastric bubbles were small or not displayed, the amniotic fluid was more, and the signs of neck or upper chest pouch and lower chest esophagus were not visible in the observation group (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that decreased ultrasound parameters HC, AC, EFW, small or no gastric bubble, amniotic fluid, neck or upper chest pouch, and no visible signs of lower chest esophagus were all risk factors for EA (P < 0.05). And in the prenatal ultrasound diagnostic model of EA was established, logistic (P) = −19.851 + HC × 0.384 + AC × 0.682 + EFW × 0.695 + small or no gastric vesicle × 3.747 + amniotic fluid × 3.607 + cervical or upper chest sac × 4.104 + invisible lower thoracic esophagus × 4.623.When logistic (P) > 0.468, AUC was 0.891, χ2 was 7.764, diagnostic sensitivity was 91.24%, and specificity was 79.22%. To draw a conclusion, prenatal ultrasound parameters and signs are of great value in the diagnosis of EA. Independent influencing factors of EA include small or no HC, AC, EFW and gastric vesicles, polyhydramnios, neck or upper chest pouch, and invisible lower thoracic esophagus. Logistic multifactor regression model has a high coincidence rate for the prenatal diagnosis of EA, providing a basis for clinical decision-making.