Enhancing recovery after minimally invasive surgery in children: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

Congenital lung malformations: a nationwide survey on management aspects by the Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Over the years, congenital lung malformations (CLM) management remains a controversial topic in pediatric thoracic surgery. The Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery performed a national survey to study the current management variability among centers, trying to define national guidelines and a standardized approach of children with congenital lung malformations.

METHODS

Following a National Society approval, an electronic survey including 35 items on post-natal management was designed, focusing on surgical, anesthesiology, radiology and pneumology aspects. The survey was conducted contacting all pediatric surgical units performing thoracic surgery.

RESULTS

39 pediatric surgery units (97.5%) participated in the study. 13 centers (33.3%) were classified as high-volume (Group A), while 26 centers (66.7%) were low volume (Group B). Variances in diagnostic imaging protocols were observed, with Group A performing fewer CT scans compared to Group B (p = 0.012). Surgical indications favored operative approaches for asymptomatic CLM and pulmonary sequestrations in both groups, while a wait-and-see approach was common for congenital lobar emphysema. Surgical timing for asymptomatic CLM differed significantly, with most high-volume centers operating on patients younger than 12 months (p = 0.02). Thoracoscopy was the preferred approach for asymptomatic CLM in most of centers, while postoperative long-term follow-up was not performed in most of the centers.

CONCLUSION

Thoracoscopic approach seems uniform in asymptomatic CLM patients and variable in symptomatic children. Lack of uniformity in surgical timing and preoperative imaging assessment has been identified as key areas to establish a common national pattern of care for CLM.

Decision-Making in Pleural Drainage Following Lung Resection in Children: A Western Pediatric Surgery Research Consortium Survey

INTRODUCTION

Studies of adults undergoing lung resection indicated that selective omission of pleural drains is safe and advantageous. Significant practice variation exists for pleural drainage practices for children undergoing lung resection. We surveyed pediatric surgeons in a 10-hospital research consortium to understand decision-making for placement of pleural drains following lung resection in children.

METHODS

Faculty surgeons at the 10 member institutions of the Western Pediatric Surgery Research Consortium completed questionnaires using a REDCap survey platform. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were used to characterize responses regarding indications and management of pleural drains following lung resection in pediatric patients.

RESULTS

We received 96 responses from 109 surgeons (88 %). Most surgeons agreed that use of a pleural drain after lung resection contributes to post-operative pain, increases narcotic use, and prolongs hospitalization. Opinions varied around the immediate use of suction compared to water seal, and half routinely completed a water seal trial prior to drain removal. Surgeons who completed fellowship within the past 10 years left a pleural drain after wedge resection in 45 % of cases versus 78 % in those who completed fellowship more than 10 years ago (p = 0.001). The mean acceptable rate of unplanned post-operative pleural drain placement when pleural drainage was omitted at index operation was 6.3 % (±4.6 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Most pediatric surgeons use pleural drainage following lung resection, with recent fellowship graduates more often omitting it. Future studies of pleural drain omission demonstrating low rates of unplanned postoperative pleural drain placement may motivate practice changes for children undergoing lung resection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Analysing Factors Prolonging Hospital Stay After Excision of Choledochal Cyst-A Pathway Towards Enhanced Recovery After Surgery

BACKGROUND

To evaluate factors affecting length of stay (LOS) after choledochal cyst resection in paediatric patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study on patients operated between 2004 and 2021. Associations between clinical factors and LOS were evaluated by bivariate analysis, multiple regression, and equivalence test.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were included. Twenty-four underwent hepaticoduodenostomy as biliary reconstruction. Five suffered from major complications. The median (25th-75th percentile) operation time was 279 (182-378) min. Median LOS, time to enteral feeding, and time to abdominal drain removal were 8(6-10), 2(1-3), and 5(4-7) days, respectively. Seven factors were found significantly associated with a shorter LOS in bivariate analysis and were included in multiple regression. It revealed that early abdominal drain removal (p < 0.001), early enteral feeding (p = 0.042), and the absence of major complications (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with shorter LOS. Equivalence test suggested that age and preoperative cholangitis had no practical effect on LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Early enteral feeding, early drain removal, and avoidance of major complications are associated with a shorter LOS.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Applied to Pediatric Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Simple Cholelithiasis: Feasibility and Teaching Insights

BACKGROUND

Same-day discharge after a cholecystectomy is a common practice in the adult population and has been demonstrated as safe and viable for children as well. However, there is a lack of comprehensive teaching models for pediatric cholecystectomy. Drawing inspiration from standardized outpatient procedures, this study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes and feasibility of teaching programs and an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol following ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pediatric patients.

METHODS

In 2015, an ERAS pathway for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was implemented, focusing on admission procedures, surgery timing, anesthetic choices, analgesia, postoperative feeding, mobilization, and pain assessment. Day-case surgery was not applicable for acute cholecystitis, choledochal lithiasis, sickle cell disease, and hereditary spherocytosis cases. The protocol was employed for a group of attending surgeons and fellows, as well as a group of residents under the supervision of experienced surgeons. A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of ambulatory cholecystectomy in children and its utilization in training pediatric surgical trainees.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2020, a total of 33 patients were included from a cohort of 162 children who underwent LC, with 15 children operated on by senior surgeons and 18 by young surgeons. The primary diagnoses were symptomatic gallbladder lithiasis (n = 32) and biliary dyskinesia (n = 1). The median age at the time of surgery was 11.3 years (interquartile range (IQR) 4.9-18), and the median duration of surgery was 54 min (IQR 13-145). One intraoperative complication occurred, involving gallbladder rupture and the dissemination of lithiasis into the peritoneal cavity. Three patients (9%) required an overnight stay, while no postoperative complications or readmissions within 30 days were observed. ERAS was successfully implemented in 30 patients (91%). No significant differences in surgical outcomes were noted between senior and young surgeons. At an average follow-up of 55 months, no long-term sequelae were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings align with the current trend of increasing use of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy and underscore its feasibility in the pediatric population. The application of a structured ERAS protocol appears viable and practical for training the next generation of pediatric surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Retroperitoneoscopic or Transperitoneal Approach for Neurogenic and Adrenal Tumors in Children? A Comparison on the Way to Enhanced Recovery in Pediatric Surgical Oncology

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery is increasingly utilized for resection of neurogenic tumors in children. The minimally invasive retroperitoneoscopic approach was recently reported in children, but transperitoneal laparoscopy still remains the most common technique. The aim of this study is to compare a novel single-port retroperitoneoscopy (SPR) approach for pediatric neurogenic tumor resection with transperitoneal laparoscopic (TPL).

METHODS

Patients undergoing minimally invasive resection of abdominal neurogenic tumors over 5 years at a single institution (from 2018 to 2022) were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor volume, stage, presence of image-defined risk factors (IDRFs), neoadjuvant chemotherapy, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), complications, oral morphine equivalents per kilogram (OME/Kg), and time to chemotherapy were assessed and compared with SPR and TPL approaches.

RESULTS

Eighteen and fifteen patients underwent TPL and SPR, respectively. No significant differences were found between the TPL and SPR approaches in terms of tumor characteristics and IDRFs. Patients who underwent SPR had a significantly faster recovery (p = 0.008) and less postoperative opioid use compared to those in TPL (p = 0.02), thus allowing an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol application. TPL and SPR approaches were performed in presence of IDRFs, respectively in 2 (11%) and 4 patients (27%), with a IDRFs-related conversion in one TPL procedure. Both approaches had one < Grade 3 Clavien Dindo complication, but not requiring further surgery.

DISCUSSION

SPR approach can be considered as a safe and feasible minimally invasive approach for the resection of pediatric primary adrenal and neurogenic tumors. The retroperitoneoscopic approach performed using a single port technique represents a promising new frontier of ERAS application in pediatric surgical oncology.

CONCLUSION

SPR is a viable surgical alternative in selected neurogenic abdominal tumors with limited IDRFs, thus allowing for the application of ERAS protocols in these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

A Survey on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Elements in Cleft Palate Repair

This study aims to characterize current use, knowledge, and attitude toward ERAS protocols by academic craniofacial surgeons.

Craniofacial surgeons were provided with electronic surveys.

Electronic survey; Institutional tertiary surgeons.

102 cleft palate surgeons surveyed and 31 completed the survey (30.4%).

None.

Respondents rated their knowledge, use, and willingness to implement perioperative interventions modeled after adult ERAS protocols.

Majority (67.7%) rated they were knowledgeable about ERAS. However, 61.3% "never use" a standardized protocol for cleft palate surgery. Only 3 ERAS elements are currently implemented by a majority of cleft surgeons: avoiding prolonged perioperative fasting (67.7%), using hypothermia prevention measures (74.2%), and minimizing use of opioids (62.5%). A large majority of respondents noted they never administer bolus (71.0%) or infusion (80.6%) dosing of tranexamic acid; most of these surgeons also indicated that administering tranexamic acid "would not be a valuable addition" (67.7% and 71.0%, respectively). Short-acting sedatives are used by 12.9% and by 16.1% of surgeons in all patients during extubation and postoperative recovery, respectively. By contrast, 22.6% never use such agents during extubation and 48.4% never use it during postoperative recovery. Overall, 67.7% of respondents replied that they would be willing to implement an ERAS protocol for cleft palate repair.

Many respondents report using interventions compatible with an ERAS approach and the majority are willing to implement an ERAS protocol for cleft palate repair.

Outcomes for 41 260 pediatric surgical patients with opioid-free anesthesia: One center's experience

BACKGROUND

Opioid use is common and associated with side effects and risks. Consequently, analgesic strategies to reduce opioid utilization have been developed. Regional anesthesia and multimodal strategies are central tenets of enhanced recovery pathways and facilitate reduced perioperative opioid use. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) protocols eliminate all intraoperative opioids, reserving opioids for postoperative rescue treatment. Systematic reviews show variable results for OFA.

METHODS

In a series of Quality Improvement (QI) projects, multidisciplinary teams developed interventions to test and spread OFA first in our ambulatory surgery center (ASC) and then in our hospital. Outcome measures were tracked using statistical process control charts to increase the adoption of OFA.

RESULTS

Between January 1, 2016, and September 30, 2022, 19 872 of 28 574 ASC patients received OFA, increasing from 30% to 98%. Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) maximum pain score, opioid-rescue rate, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) treatment all decreased concomitantly. The use of OFA now represents our ambulatory standard practice. Over the same timeframe, the spread of this practice to our hospital led to 21 388 of 64 859 patients undergoing select procedures with OFA, increasing from 15% to 60%. Opioid rescue rate and PONV treatment in PACU decreased while hospital maximum pain scores and length of stay were stable. Two procedural examples with OFA benefits were identified. The use of OFA allowed relaxation of adenotonsillectomy admission criteria, resulting in 52 hospital patient days saved. Transition to OFA for laparoscopic appendectomy occurred concomitantly with a decrease in the mean hospital length of stay from 2.9 to 1.4 days, representing a savings of >500 hospital patient days/year.

CONCLUSIONS

These QI projects demonstrated that most pediatric ambulatory and select inpatient surgeries are amenable to OFA techniques which may reduce PONV without worsening pain.

Meta-Analysis of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols for the Perioperative Management of Pediatric Colorectal Surgery

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for the management of pediatric colorectal surgery.

METHODS

We retrieved relevant studies from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledgement Infrastructure (CNKI) from its inception until 20 May 2022. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4, and power analysis was calculated using G∗Power 3.1.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 1298 patients were included for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis suggested that ERAS protocol significantly lessened intraoperative fluids (mean difference [MD], -3.11; 95% confidence interval, -4.99 to -1.22) and postoperative opioid usage (MD, -0.58; 95% CI, -1.08 to -0.26), shortened time to bowel return (MD, -12.02; 95% CI, -20.03 to -4.02), first enteral nutrition (MD, -20.88; 95% CI, -28.34 to -13.42) and oral intake (MD, -1.40; 95% CI, -1.96 to -0.84), lowered readmission rate in 30 days (relative risk [RR], 0.61, 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.90), shortened length of hospital stay (MD, -1.50; 95% CI, -1.25 to -1.09), and reduced in-hospital costs (MD, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.18); however, there was a comparable rate of postoperative complications between the two groups. Sensitivity analysis significantly changed the result of the readmission rate in 30 days. The statistical power of all outcomes ranged from 26.84% to 99.44%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate the beneficial role of the ERAS protocol in accelerating rehabilitation, shortening the length of hospital stay, and decreasing in-hospital costs among pediatric patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

LEVEL V.

Implementation of Enhanced Recovery Protocols After Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children: A Multinational Survey Study Among International Pediatric Endosurgery Group and European Paediatric Surgeons' Association Members

Aim: The aim of this multinational survey was to provide insights into individual surgeon's experience with implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs centered on minimally invasive surgery (misERAS) and to identify perceived barriers to utilization of these protocols. Methods: An online survey was conducted between July 2021 and March 2022 on behalf of the International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) and European Paediatric Surgeons' Association (EUPSA) Research Committees. All IPEG and EUPSA members were contacted by e-mail and asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire that included 20 items. Results: Of an estimated 890 IPEG and 800 EUPSA members, 248 completed the survey (14.7%). A minority of respondents (n = 45, 18.1%) stated that misERAS protocols were followed as "utilizing specific ERAS guidelines," whereas 67.3% (n = 167) replied that they were trying to adhere to the basic ERAS principles in their practice. Almost half (n = 117, 47.2%) of the respondents stated that there was an increase in implementation of specific misERAS guidelines over the last 5 years. A lack of education and standardized protocols, lack of support and collaboration, and the existing culture leading to moderate to extreme barriers to misERAS implementation were reported by 25%-40% of respondents. Conclusions: This survey demonstrates that pediatric surgeons from the IPEG and EUPSA communities try to adhere to basic ERAS principles when performing MIS. The major barrier to misERAS implementation is profound lack of education. The fact that only 18% of respondents utilize specific institutional misERAS protocols suggests that at present, ERAS has not found its way into MIS in the broad landscape.

Enhanced recovery after surgery in pediatric urology: Current evidence and future practice

PURPOSE

To offer an up-to-date appraisal of the current status of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in pediatric urology and to provide a guide for the clinical urologist.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature search and scoping review on ERAS protocols in pediatric urology using Pubmed (from 1946), Cochrane library, and MEDLINE to December 2021 with the terms ''enhanced recovery'', ''protocolised care'', ''post-operative protocol", ''fast-track surgery'' and ''pediatric urology". Studies were excluded if they did not include perioperative intervention related to urological procedures, no full-text available and in non-English language.

RESULTS

To date, eight clinical studies (involving 1153 patients) have been published on ERAS protocols in pediatric urology. The patients involved ranged from neonates to adolescents, and the urological procedures included bladder augmentation, the Mitrofanoff procedure, laparoscopic pyeloplasty, laparoscopic nephrectomy, hypospadias repair, etc. Multidisciplinary components such as surgical and anesthetic considerations have been employed in ERAS protocols. The length of hospital stay was significantly lower in the ERAS groups with earlier enteral feeding resumption and return of bowel function in pediatric urology patients. The implementation of ERAS protocols does not result in higher complication and readmission rates; instead, some studies have even demonstrated a significant reduction in complication occurrence.

CONCLUSION

ERAS is novel to pediatric urology with a limited scale of published data in the literature. Initial clinical studies revealed that ERAS appears to be efficacious in the field of pediatric urology. Further prospective studies formulating a standardized multimodal protocol are encouraged to better understand key components of ERAS and incorporate ERAS into clinical practice to optimize surgical outcomes for pediatric urology procedures.

Completion of an Enhanced Recovery Program in a Pediatric Ambulatory Surgery Center: A Quality Improvement Initiative

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) was first established in 2001 focusing on recovery from complex surgical procedures in adults and recently expanded to ambulatory surgery. The evidence for ERAS in children is limited. In 2018, recognized experts began developing needed pediatric evidence. Center-wide efforts involving all ambulatory surgical patients and procedures have not previously been described.

METHODS

A comprehensive assessment and gap analysis of ERAS elements in our ambulatory center identified 11 of 19 existing elements. The leadership committed to implementing an Enhanced Recovery Program (ERP) to improve existing elements and close as many remaining gaps as possible. A quality improvement (QI) team was launched to improve 5 existing ERP elements and to introduce 6 new elements (target 17/19 ERP elements). The project plan was broken into 1 preparation phase to collect baseline data and 3 implementation phases to enhance existing and implement new elements. Statistical process control methodology was used. Team countermeasures were based on available evidence. A consensus process was used to resolve disagreement. Monthly meetings were held to share real-time data, gather new feedback, and modify countermeasure plans as needed. The primary outcome measure selected was mean postanesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes measures were mean maximum pain score in PACU and patient/family satisfaction scores.

RESULTS

The team had expanded the pool of active ERP elements from 11 to 16 of 19. The mean PACU LOS demonstrated significant reduction (early in phase 1 and again in phase 3). No change was seen for the mean maximum pain score in PACU or surgical complication rates. Patient/family satisfaction scores were high and sustained throughout the period of study (91.1% ± 5.7%). Patient/family and provider engagement/compliance were high.

CONCLUSIONS

This QI project demonstrated the feasibility of pediatric ERP in an ambulatory surgical setting. Furthermore, a center-wide approach was shown to be possible. Additional studies are needed to determine the relevance of this project to other institutions.

Effects on Recovery of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Propofol versus Ketofol for Short-Lasting Laparoscopic Procedures

BACKGROUND

Combining ketamine and propofol (ketofol) was suggested as a new concept for sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric populations for various conditions. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and ketofol on recovery after laparoscopic surgery in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Two hundred children with median age of 5 years who underwent laparoscopic surgery were randomized into two groups. Propofol 1% was used for induction and maintenance of anesthesia in group I, while ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) was used in group II. Ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) was prepared in the same applicator for group II. Ketofol ratios of 1:4 and 1:7 were used for induction and maintenance of anesthesia, respectively. A reduced McFarlan infusion dose was used in group I (1.2, 1.0, and 0.8 mL/kg/h for 15, 15, and 30 min, respectively), while a McFarlan infusion dose was used in group II (1.5, 1.3, and 1.1 mL/kg/h for 15, 15, and 30 min, respectively). Extubating time, duration of anesthesia, and length of stay in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) were recorded.

RESULTS

Extubating time was significantly lower in the ketofol group than in the propofol group (240 s vs. 530 s; p < 0.00001). Significantly shorter duration of anesthesia (47 min vs. 60 min; p < 0.00001) as well as length of stay in the PACU (35 min vs. 100 min; p < 0.00001) were recorded in ketofol compared to the propofol group. Total fentanyl (100 µg (interquartile range, IQR 80, 125) vs. 50 µg (IQR 40, 60); p < 0.00001) and propofol (260 mg (IQR 200, 350) vs. 160 mg (IQR 120, 210); p < 0.00001) consumption per body weight were significantly lower in the ketofol group.

CONCLUSIONS

TIVA with ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) using a reduced McFarlan dose regimen shortened extubating time, duration of anesthesia, as well as length of stay in the PACU in pediatric anesthesia after laparoscopic surgery.