The effect of air cooling pain relief on protoporphyrin IX photobleaching and clinical efficacy during dermatological photodynamic therapy

Efficacy of two different methods of cold air analgesia for pain relief in PDT of actinic keratoses of the head region - a randomized controlled comparison study

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective method for treating actinic keratosis (AK) with pain during illumination representing the major side effect. The efficacy of two different cooling methods for pain relief in PDT of AK in the head region was compared.

METHODS

Randomized, assessor-blinded, half side comparison study in 20 patients with symmetrically distributed AK on the head. Conventional PDT was performed on both halves of the scalp or face by applying 20% aminolevulinic acid cream (ALA) and subsequent illumination with incoherent red light. During illumination one side was cooled with a cold air blower (CAB) and the other with a standard fan (FAN) in a randomized fashion. Pain and skin temperature were recorded during and after PDT. The phototoxic skin reaction was evaluated up to seven days after PDT. The clearance rate of AK was assessed at 3 and 6 months after PDT.

RESULTS

Mean pain (VASmean), maximum pain intensity (VASmax) and the mean skin temperature during PDT were significantly lower with CAB as compared to FAN (VASmean: 2.7 ± 1.4 vs. 3.7 ± 2.1, p = 0.003; VASmax: 3.8 ± 2.0 vs. 4.8 ± 2.5, p = 0.002; 26.8 ± 2.0 °C vs. 32.1 ± 1.7 °C; p=<0.001). The severity of the phototoxic skin reaction and the clearance rate of AK did not differ between the two cooling methods.

CONCLUSION

Cooling with CAB during PDT has a greater analgesic effect than cooling with FAN. Patients with a lower skin temperature during illumination tended to experience less pain, however, this effect did not reach the level of statistical significance.

Nanoparticle-Mediated Photothermal Therapy Limitation in Clinical Applications Regarding Pain Management

The development of new effective cancer treatment methods has attracted much attention, mainly due to the limited efficacy and considerable side effects of currently used cancer treatment methods such as radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Photothermal therapy based on the use of plasmonically resonant metallic nanoparticles has emerged as a promising technique to eradicate cancer cells selectively. In this method, plasmonic nanoparticles are first preferentially uptaken by a tumor and then selectively heated by exposure to laser radiation with a specific plasmonic resonant wavelength, to destroy the tumor whilst minimizing damage to adjacent normal tissue. However, several parameters can limit the effectiveness of photothermal therapy, resulting in insufficient heating and potentially leading to cancer recurrence. One of these parameters is the patient's pain sensation during the treatment, if this is performed without use of anesthetic. Pain can restrict the level of applicable laser radiation, cause an interruption to the treatment course and, as such, affect its efficacy, as well as leading to a negative patient experience and consequential general population hesitancy to this type of therapy. Since having a comfortable and painless procedure is one of the important treatment goals in the clinic, along with its high effectiveness, and due to the relatively low number of studies devoted to this specific topic, we have compiled this review. Moreover, non-invasive and painless methods for temperature measurement during photothermal therapy (PTT), such as Raman spectroscopy and nanothermometry, will be discussed in the following. Here, we firstly outline the physical phenomena underlying the photothermal therapy, and then discuss studies devoted to photothermal cancer treatment concerning pain management and pathways for improved efficiency of photothermal therapy whilst minimizing pain experienced by the patient.

Fluorescence and thermal imaging of non-melanoma skin cancers before and during photodynamic therapy

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been shown to be less effective on the extremities. Protoporphyrin-IX (PpIX) fluorescence and skin surface temperature are variables that have been implicated in the differences in efficacy with body site, but objective studies have not been undertaken.

OBJECTIVES

To further investigate observations from our previous study that temperature and fluorescence during pro-drug incubation are correlated, through a prospective objective investigation of the relationships between fluorescence and skin surface temperature before and during PDT and relationships with body site and efficacy.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with Bowen's disease or basal cell carcinoma, who had been referred for PDT, were recruited to this study. PpIX fluorescence and thermal measurements were recorded at intervals during the pro-drug incubation and irradiation phases of PDT. Pain immediately after irradiation, and outcome at 3- and 12-months were recorded.

RESULTS

Temperature and PpIX fluorescence were higher on the trunk than lower leg immediately before treatment (median temperature 32.7 °C vs. 27.8 °C, p < 0.05 and median fluorescence 16.5 vs. 6.7, p < 0.05). Higher pain levels were reported during PDT on the extremities (median 5.7 vs. 2.2, p < 0.05). Clearance rates at 12-months were 80 %.

CONCLUSIONS

The study supports a correlation between temperature and PpIX fluorescence during PDT, providing robust objective data to support our previous hypothesis and observations. The higher pain levels, lower PpIX fluorescence on the lower leg, and the high efficacy rates at all body sites irrespective of temperature and fluorescence indicates that relationships between PDT treatment conditions and parameters is likely to be multifactorial.

Photodynamic Therapy for Basal Cell Carcinoma: The Clinical Context for Future Research Priorities

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an established treatment option for low-risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC). BCC is the most common human cancer and also a convenient cancer in which to study PDT treatment. This review clarifies challenges to researchers evident from the clinical use of PDT in BCC treatment. It outlines the context of PDT and how PDT treatments for BCC have been developed hitherto. The sections examine the development of systemic and subsequently topical photosensitizers, light delivery regimens, and the use of PDT in different patient populations and subtypes of BCC. The outcomes of topical PDT are discussed in comparison with alternative treatments, and topical PDT applications in combination and adjuvant therapy are considered. The intention is to summarize the clinical relevance and expose areas of research need in the BCC context, ultimately to facilitate improvements in PDT treatment.

Smartphone fluorescence imager for quantitative dosimetry of protoporphyrin-IX-based photodynamic therapy in skin

Significance: While clinical treatment of actinic keratosis by photodynamic therapy (PDT) is widely practiced, there is a well-known variability in response, primarily caused by heterogeneous accumulation of the photosensitizer protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) between patients and between lesions, but measurement of this is rarely done. Aim: Develop a smartphone-based fluorescence imager for simple quantitative photography of the lesions and their PpIX levels that can be used in a new clinical workflow to guide the reliability of aminolevulinic acid (ALA) application for improved lesion clearance. Approach: The smartphone fluorescence imager uses an iPhone and a custom iOS application for image acquisition, a 3D-printed base for measurement standardization, an emission filter for PpIX fluorescence isolation, and a 405-nm LED ring for optical excitation. System performance was tested to ensure measurement reproducibility and the ability to capture photosensitizer accumulation and photobleaching in pre-clinical and clinical settings. Results: PpIX fluorescence signal from tissue-simulating phantoms showed linear sensitivity in the 0.01 to 2.0 μM range. Murine studies with Ameluz® aminolevulinic acid (ALA) gel and initial human testing with Levulan® ALA cream verified that in-vivo imaging was feasible, including that PpIX production over 1 h is easily captured and that photobleaching from the light treatment could be quantified. Conclusions: The presented device is the first quantitative wide-field fluorescence imaging system for PDT dosimetry designed for clinical skin use and for maximal ease of translation into clinical workflow. The results lay the foundation for using the system in clinical studies to establish treatment thresholds for the individualization of PDT treatment.

A New Light-Emitting, Fabric-Based Device for Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Keratosis: Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Intra-Individual, Phase II Noninferiority Study (the Phosistos Study)

BACKGROUND

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common early in situ skin carcinoma caused by long-term sun exposure and usually develops on sun-exposed skin areas. Left untreated, AK may progress to squamous cell carcinoma. To prevent such risk, most clinicians routinely treat AK. Therapy options for AK include cryotherapy, topical treatments, curettage, excision surgery, and photodynamic therapy (PDT).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to assess the noninferiority, in terms of efficacy at 3 months, of a PDT protocol involving a new light-emitting device (PDT using the Phosistos protocol [P-PDT]) compared with the conventional protocol (PDT using the conventional protocol [C-PDT]) in the treatment of AK.

METHODS

In this randomized, controlled, multicenter, intra-individual, phase II noninferiority clinical study, subjects with AK of the forehead and scalp are treated with P-PDT on one area and with C-PDT on the contralateral area. In both areas, lesions are prepared and methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) is applied. Thirty minutes after MAL application, the P-PDT area is exposed to red light at low irradiance (1.3 mW/cm²) for 2.5 hours so that a light dose of 12 J/cm² is achieved. In the control area (C-PDT area), a 37 J/cm² red light irradiation is performed 3 hours after MAL application. Recurrent AK at 3 months is retreated. The primary end point is the lesion complete response rate at 3 months. Secondary end points include pain scores at 1 day, local tolerance at 7 days, lesion complete response rate at 6 months, cosmetic outcome at 3 and 6 months, and patient-reported quality of life and satisfaction throughout the study. A total of 45 patients needs to be recruited.

RESULTS

Clinical investigations are complete: 46 patients were treated with P-PDT on one area (n=285 AK) and with C-PDT on the contralateral area (n=285 AK). Data analysis is ongoing, and statistical results will be available in the first half of 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

In case of noninferiority in efficacy and superiority in tolerability of P-PDT compared with C-PDT, P-PDT could become the treatment of choice for AK.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03076892; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03076892 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/779qqVKek).

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/12990.

Regression Analysis of Protoporphyrin IX Measurements Obtained During Dermatological Photodynamic Therapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a light activated drug therapy that can be used to treat a number of dermatological cancers and precancers. Improvement of efficacy is required to widen its application. Clinical protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) fluorescence data were obtained using a pre-validated, non-invasive imaging system during routine methyl aminolevulinate (MAL)-PDT treatment of 172 patients with licensed dermatological indications (37.2% actinic keratosis, 27.3% superficial basal cell carcinoma and 35.5% Bowen’s disease). Linear and logistic regressions were employed to model any relationships between variables that may have affected PpIX accumulation and/or PpIX photobleaching during irradiation and thus clinical outcome at three months. Patient age was found to be associated with lower PpIX accumulation/photobleaching, however only a reduction in PpIX photobleaching appeared to consistently adversely affect treatment efficacy. Clinical clearance was reduced in lesions located on the limbs, hands and feet with lower PpIX accumulation and subsequent photobleaching adversely affecting the outcome achieved. If air cooling pain relief was employed during light irradiation, PpIX photobleaching was lower and this resulted in an approximate three-fold reduction in the likelihood of achieving clinical clearance. PpIX photobleaching during the first treatment was concluded to be an excellent predictor of clinical outcome across all lesion types.

The influence of different illumination parameters on protoporphyrin IX induced cell death in squamous cell carcinoma cells

BACKGROUND

Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a highly effective therapy especially for extended cancerized fields of the skin. Whenever extended fields are treated pain management is advisable. Light source mediated pain management can be performed by reducing fluence rates, as long as this does not compromise efficacy.

METHODS

Two squamous cell carcinoma cell lines (A431 and SCC-13) were subjected to in vitro PDT using two different ALA concentrations and synthesis intervals and protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) synthesis was assessed. Two total light doses (6 J/cm² and 37 J/cm²) were applied at three different fluence rates and cell viability was measured using the MTS-test.

RESULTS

Both cell lines synthetized PpIX at different kinetics. A431 cells produced a maximum 28.6 nmol/l PpIX, while SCC-13 reached only a production of 8.7 nmol/l. Illumination reduced cell viability depending on PpIX content and light dose. When a lower light dose (6 J/cm²) was applied, only the combination with the highest PpIX content was effective in A431 cells and no effect could be detected in SCC-13 cells. With a light dose of 37 J/cm², lower PpIX amounts became effective in A431 and cell death could be induced in SCC-13 cells. Light fluence rate had no differential effect in this setup.

CONCLUSIONS

In both, A431 and SCC-13 cells, total light dose is a key factor for photodynamic efficacy. Additionally, our results hint towards a threshold concentration of PpIX upon which a drastic loss of viability occurs. Light fluence rate in the analyzed range is not a limiting factor of photodynamic cytotoxicity. This may allow for the clinical implementation of low fluence rate protocols for pain management without compromising efficacy.

Photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: Is the European consensus protocol for daylight PDT superior to conventional protocol for Aktilite CL 128 PDT?

BACKGROUND

Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an established treatment modality for various dermato-oncologic conditions. In Europe, initially requiring irradiation with red light, PDT of actinic keratosis (AK) can now also be carried out with exposure to daylight that has been clinically proven to be as effective as and less painful than red light.

OBJECTIVES

In this paper, we propose a comparison between the conventional protocol for Aktilite CL 128 (red light source) PDT and the European consensus protocol for daylight PDT - with the exposure is assumed to be performed during either a clear sunny day or an overcast day - in the treatment of AK with methyl aminolevulinate through a mathematical modeling.

METHOD

This already published modeling that is based on an iterative procedure alternating determination of the local fluence rate and updating of the local optical properties enables to estimate the local damage induced by the therapy.

RESULTS

The European consensus protocol for daylight PDT during a sunny day and an overcast day provides, on average, 6.50 and 1.79 times higher PDT local damages at the end of the treatment than those obtained using the conventional protocol for Aktilite CL 128 PDT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Results analysis shows that, even performed during an overcast day, the European consensus protocol for daylight PDT leads to higher PDT local damages than the efficient conventional protocol for Aktilite CL 128.

Two-step irradiance schedule versus single-dose cold compress for pain control during 5-aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy of condyloma acuminatum

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of two-step irradiance schedule in relieving pain during PDT of CA.

METHODS

The study was a prospective, controlled trial of 141 CA patients who were randomly divided into Group A (two-step irradiance schedule) and Group B (single-dose cold compress). The numeric rating scales (NRS) of patients' pain were recorded at 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes during each PDT.

RESULTS

The efficacy of PDT and NRS scores of patients in the two groups were compared. There was no significant difference in gender, age, lesion site, and disease course between the two groups (P > 0.05). In addition, the cure rate of patients in the two groups was not significantly different (97.1% vs. 95.8%, χ²  = 0.000, P = 1.000). However, the NRS scores at different time points and number of PDT sessions were significantly different (F = 198.233 and 165.224, respectively, P < 0.05). The NRS scores of patients in Group A were significantly lower than those of patients in Group B (F = 82.762, P < 0.0001). Moreover, the NRS scores at different positions were significantly different (F = 28.286, P < 0.0001). The NRS scores of penis were significantly lower than those of the vulva and crissum (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with single-dose cold compress, two-step irradiance schedule could more significantly reduce the patients' pain degree during treatment, especially for vulva and crissum. Lasers Surg. Med. 49:908-912, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The Role of Photodynamic Therapy in Acne: An Evidence-Based Review

BACKGROUND

Acne vulgaris is a highly prevalent skin disorder that affects almost all adolescents and can persist into adulthood. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an emerging treatment for acne that involves the use of a photosensitizer in combination with a light source and oxygen.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature and critically evaluated the studies. Sixty-nine clinical trials, four case reports, and two retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria, and seven of the studies were high quality.

RESULTS

The most common photosensitizers used were 5-aminolevulinic acid and methyl aminolevulinate, and both showed similar response. Red light was the most frequently used light source, followed by intense pulsed light, and showed comparable results. Inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions both responded to treatment, with inflammatory lesions showing greater clearance in most studies. Adverse events associated with PDT for acne were mild and included pain on illumination and post-procedural erythema and edema. PDT has been safely used in higher Fitzpatrick skin types (III-IV), although these patients had a higher risk of transient hyperpigmentation.

CONCLUSION

This review supports PDT as an efficacious treatment for acne and a good adjunctive treatment for mild to severe acne, especially in patients who have not responded to topical therapy and oral antibacterials, and are not great candidates for isotretinoin. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the optimal photosensitizers, light sources, incubation times, and number of treatments for PDT use in acne.

Photodynamic Therapy: A Clinical Consensus Guide

BACKGROUND

The American Society of Dermatologic Surgery (ASDS) periodically develops consensus documents for its members concerning various aspects of dermatologic surgery. Advances in photodynamic therapy (PDT) have been many and PDT use has been established in a variety of skin conditions.

OBJECTIVE

The ASDS board of directors proposed a committee of experts in the field to develop consensus documents on different treatments. An expert panel reviewed the literature on PDT and discussed the findings. The consensus was reached with evidence-based recommendations on different clinical applications for PDT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This consensus document includes discussions regarding PDT, including different photosensitizers and various light source activators, historical perspective, mechanism of action, various therapeutic indications and expected outcomes, pre- and post-care, and management of adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Photodynamic therapy is highly effective for pre-cancerous lesions, superficial nonmelanoma skin cancers, inflammatory acne vulgaris and other conditions. New protocols including laser mediated PDT significantly improve results for several indications.

CONCLUSION

The ASDS consensus document on PDT will be helpful for educating members on safe and effective PDT for a variety of indications.

Red light photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis using 37 J/cm2 : Fractionated irradiation with 12.3 mW/cm2 after 30 minutes incubation time compared to standard continuous irradiation with 75 mW/cm2 after 3 hours incubation time using a mathematical modeling

OBJECTIVE AND STUDY DESIGN

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an emerging treatment modality for various diseases, especially for dermatological conditions. Although, the standard PDT protocol for the treatment of actinic keratoses in Europe has shown to be effective, treatment-associated pain is often observed in patients. Different modifications to this protocol attempted to decrease pain have been investigated. The decrease in fluence rate seems to be a promising solution. Moreover, it has been suggested that light fractionation significantly increases the efficacy of PDT. Based on a flexible light-emitting textile, the FLEXITHERALIGHT device specifically provides a fractionated illumination at a fluence rate more than six times lower than that of the standard protocol. In a recently completed clinical trial of PDT for the treatment of actinic keratosis, the non-inferiority of a protocol involving illumination with the FLEXITHERALIGHT device after a short incubation time and referred to as the FLEXITHERALIGHT protocol has been assessed compared to the standard protocol. In this paper, we propose a comparison of the two above mentioned 635 nm red light protocols with 37 J/cm² in the PDT treatment of actinic keratosis: the standard protocol and the FLEXITHERALIGHT one through a mathematical modeling.

METHODS

This mathematical modeling, which slightly differs from the one we have already published, enables the local damage induced by the therapy to be estimated.

RESULTS

The comparison performed in terms of the local damage induced by the therapy demonstrates that the FLEXITHERALIGHT protocol with lower fluence rate, light fractionation and shorter incubation time is somewhat less efficient than the standard protocol. Nevertheless, from the clinical trial results, the FLEXITHERALIGHT protocol results in non-inferior response rates compared to the standard protocol.

CONCLUSION

This finding raises the question of whether the PDT local damage achieved by the FLEXITHERALIGHT protocol (respectively, the standard protocol) is sufficient (respectively, excessive) to destroy actinic keratosis cells. Lasers Surg. Med. 49:686-697, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Pre-treatment protoporphyrin IX concentration in actinic keratosis lesions may be a predictive biomarker of response to aminolevulinic-acid based photodynamic therapy

BACKGROUND

Although aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-induced protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective FDA-approved therapy for actinic keratosis (AK), a substantial fraction of patients (up to 25%) do not respond to treatment. This study examined the feasibility of using pre-treatment measurements of PpIX concentration in AK lesions to predict response of ALA-PpIX PDT.

METHODS

A non-invasive fiber-optic fluorescence spectroscopy system was used to measure PpIX concentration in patients undergoing standard-of-care ALA-PDT for AK. All patients provided assessments of pain at the time of treatment (n=70), and a subset reported pain and erythema 48-76 h after treatment (n=13).

RESULTS

PpIX concentration was significantly higher in lesions of patients reporting high levels of pain (VAS score ≥5) immediately after treatment vs. patients reporting pain scores below VAS=5 (p<0.022) (n=70). However, pain was not an exclusive indicator of PpIX concentration as many patients with low PpIX concentration reported high pain. In a subpopulation of patients surveyed in the days after treatment (n=13), PpIX concentration measured on the day of treatment was uncorrelated with pain-reported immediately after treatment (r=0.17, p<0.57), but positive correlations were found between PpIX concentration and patient-reported pain (r=0.55, p<0.051) and erythema (r=0.58, p<0.039) in the 48-72 h following treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that in vivo optical measurements of PpIX concentration acquired before light delivery may be an objective predictor of response to ALA-PpIX PDT. Identification of non-responding patients on the day of treatment could facilitate the use of interventions that may improve outcomes.

Photodynamic therapy--aspects of pain management

Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a highly effective and safe treatment method for actinic keratoses with an excellent cosmetic outcome and is commonly used for the therapy of large areas of photodamaged skin with multiple clinically manifest and subclinical lesions. However, the major drawback of photodynamic therapy is the pain experienced during the treatment that can be intense and sometimes even intolerable for patients, requiring interruption or termination of the process. Several strategies for controlling pain during photodynamic therapy have been studied but few effective methods are currently available. Therefore, this review puts the spotlight on predictors on pain intensity and aspects of pain management during photodynamic therapy.

Correlations between photoactivable porphyrins' fluorescence, erythema and the pain induced by PDT on normal skin using ALA-derivatives

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with precursors of photoactivable porphyrins is a well-established treatment modality for skin pathologies as well as hair removal. Pain is a major side effect thereof, and it affects the treatment compliance and acceptance.

METHODS

Five male subjects underwent a PDT procedure on normal skin, either with a diode laser (635 nm) or a lamp (405 nm), 3 or 6h after application of various precursors of photoactivable porphyrins (ALA 1M; Metvix(®) 1M; ALA-DGME 1M; ALA-DGME 3.66 M). Light doses ranged from 30 to 150 J/cm(2) and irradiances were 100 or 180 mW/cm(2). Fluorescence measurements were performed just before PDT, pain was quantified during PDT, and erythema was determined 24h afterwards.

RESULTS

Because precursor ALA-DGME was very selective for the pilosebaceous apparatus vs. the epidermis, we solely carried out the PDTs using this precursor. In the absence of light, no pain was reported. An increase in pain was observed when increasing the irradiance. A correlation was observed between the follicular fluorescence and the maximal pain score during PDT. A correlation was observed between follicular fluorescence and skin erythema, and between pain score and skin erythema.

CONCLUSIONS

With our well-controlled PDT parameters and homogenous subjects' conditions, we showed that pain could be reduced by reducing irradiance during PDT procedures. With the various correlations observed, we conclude that both pain and PaP fluorescence are useful tools to predict the post-PDT tissue effects (side effects and outcome). We suggest that A∂ nerve fibres would be the best candidate as first generators of PDT-induced pain.

[Fluorescence diagnosis of non-melanoma skin cancer]

Photodynamic therapy involves - in dermatological practice usually exogenous - application of a photosensitizer then activation of accumulated protoporphyrin IX by light with an appropriate wavelength after a short incubation period. It is an evidence based method to treat certain non-melanoma skin cancers. During treatment when the excited protoporphyrin IX returns to base state, reactive oxygen species are formed leading to cell death in rapidly proliferating cells. Fluorescence of excited protoporphyrin IX can be used in diagnostics as well. In ultraviolet light, the photodamaged or neoplastic areas show coral red fluorescence which can clearly be distinguished from the much lower fluorescence of adjacent normal tissue. This process is suitable for exact determination of tumor margins so it can be used for planning surgical procedures or after photodynamic therapy at a follow up visit for the visualization of the therapeutic result. The present article reviews the literature of photodynamic diagnosis that is also used by the authors.

Pain in photodynamic therapy: mechanism of action and management strategies

Photodynamic therapy involves administration of a photosensitizing drug and its subsequent activation by irradiation with a light source at wavelengths matching the absorption spectrum of the photosensitizer. In many countries around the world, topical photodynamic therapy has been approved for treatment of cutaneous oncologic conditions such as actinic keratosis, Bowen's disease, and superficial basal cell carcinoma. Multicenter, randomized, controlled studies have confirmed its efficacy and superior cosmetic outcomes compared to conventional therapies. Nevertheless, this therapeutic method presents some adverse effects, such as erythema, edema, pigmentation, pustules, and pain. There is no doubt that pain is the most severe of the adverse effects, being sometimes responsible for definitive treatment interruption. The pain mechanism has not yet been fully understood, which makes complete pain control a challenge to be conquered. In spite of that, this literature review presents some useful pain management strategies as well as the most important pain-related factors in photodynamic therapy.

Effect of 710 nm visible light irradiation on neurite outgrowth in primary rat cortical neurons following ischemic insult

OBJECTIVE

We previously reported that 710 nm Light-emitting Diode (LED) has a protective effect through cellular immunity activation in the stroke animal model. However, whether LED directly protects neurons suffering from neurodegeneration was entirely unknown. Therefore, we sought to determine the effects of 710 nm visible light irradiation on neuronal protection and neuronal outgrowth in an in vitro stroke model.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Primary cultured rat cortical neurons were exposed to oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) and reoxygenation and normal conditions. An LED array with a peak wavelength of 710 nm was placed beneath the covered culture dishes with the room light turned off and were irradiated accordingly. LED treatments (4 min at 4 J/cm(2) and 50 mW/cm(2)) were given once to four times within 8h at 2h intervals for 7 days. Mean neurite density, mean neurite diameter, and total fiber length were also measured after microtubule associated protein 2 (MAP2) immunostaining using the Axio Vision program. Synaptic marker expression and MAPK activation were confirmed by Western blotting.

RESULTS

Images captured after MAP2 immunocytochemistry showed significant (p<0.05) enhancement of post-ischemic neurite outgrowth with LED treatment once and twice a day. MAPK activation was enhanced by LED treatment in both OGD-exposed and normal cells. The levels of synaptic markers such as PSD 95, GAP 43, and synaptophysin significantly increased with LED treatment in both OGD-exposed and normal cells (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that LED treatment may promote synaptogenesis through MAPK activation and subsequently protect cell death in the in vitro stroke model.