The impact of glutathione S–transferase genotype and phenotype on the adverse drug reactions to azathioprine in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases

The Thiopurine Tale: An Unexpected Journey

Exactly 70 years ago [1951] mercaptopurine was discovered by Gertrude Elion as a novel treatment option for acute leukaemia. A total of three thiopurines (also thioguanine [1950] and azathioprine [1957]) were developed over time. These immunosuppressive drugs were also successfully introduced a few decades later to prevent rejection of transplanted organs and to treat several autoimmune diseases. For her discovery of thiopurines and other antimetabolite drugs, in 1988 Elion was rewarded, together with George Hitchings and James Black, with the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Important steps have been made in recent years to unravel its metabolism, mode of action and pharmacogenetics. Today thiopurine [based] therapy remains an essential immunosuppressive approach in treating patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Xanthine oxidase activity in thiopurine curative Chinese inflammatory bowel disease patients

Xanthine oxidase (XO) competes with thiopurine S‐methyltransferase (TPMT) and hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) to metabolize azathioprine (AZA)/6‐mercaptopurine (6‐MP) in vivo. A retrospective investigation was performed to detect the activity of XO in thiopurine curative Chinese inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. We also evaluated whether a relationship between XO activity and incidence of thiopurine‐induced adverse effects (AEs) existed. Clinical data and blood samples were collected from 140 IBD patients before receiving AZA/6‐MP therapy, and the erythrocyte XO activity was measured. The XO activities of all patients were 20.29 ± 4.43 U/g Hb. No sex difference in XO activity was observed (p = .728), and the XO activity showed no difference between the UC and CD patients (p = .082). AEs were observed in 41 (29.3%) patients including leukopenia (26, 18.57%), gastrointestinal intolerance (11, 7.86%), flu‐like symptom (5, 3.57%), alopecia (5, 3.57%), and hepatotoxicity (1, 0.71%). XO activity was significantly lower in the patients with AEs than in those without AEs (18.40 ± 3.73 vs. 21.07 ± 4.48 U/g Hb, p = .001), especially in the patients with leukopenia (18.29 ± 3.68 vs. 21.07 ± 4.48 U/g Hb, p = .004). However, no significant difference in XO activity was found between patients with and without other AEs. Decreased XO activity was observed in the patients who developed flu‐like symptoms (17.58 ± 3.50 U/g Hb) and alopecia (18.67 ± 2.91 U/g Hb) compared to those who did not, although the differences did not reach statistical significance. These findings suggested that patients with low XO expression might have a high risk of thiopurine‐induced toxicity.

Retrospective Data Analysis of the Influence of Age and Sex on TPMT Activity and Its Phenotype-Genotype Correlation

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of thiopurine drugs (used as anticancer and immunosuppressant agents) are affected by thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) enzyme activity. TPMT genotype and/or phenotype is used to predict the risk for adverse effects before drug administration. Inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase (ITPA) is another enzyme involved in thiopurine metabolism. In this study, we aimed to evaluate (a) frequency of various TPMT phenotypes and genotypes, (b) correlations between them, (c) influence of age and sex on TPMT activity, and (d) distribution of ITPA variants among various TPMT subgroups.

METHODS

TPMT enzyme activity was determined by LC-MS/MS. TPMT (*2,*3A-C) and ITPA (rs1127354, rs7270101) genotypes were determined using a customized TaqMan^® OpenArray^®.

RESULTS

TPMT enzyme activity varied largely (6.3-90 U/mL). The frequency of low, intermediate, normal, and high activity was 0.5% (n = 230), 13.1% (n = 5998), 86.1% (n = 39448), and 0.28% (n = 126), respectively. No significant difference in TPMT activity in relation to age and sex was found. Genotype analysis revealed the frequency of variant TPMT alleles was 6.73% (*3A, n = 344), 0.05% (*3B, n = 2), 2.22% (*3C, n = 95), and 0.42% (*2, n = 19). Analysis of paired phenotype and genotype showed that TPMT activity in samples with variant allele(s) was significantly lower than those without variant alleles. Lastly, an equal distribution of ITPA variants was found among normal and abnormal TPMT activity.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective data analysis demonstrated a clustering of variant TPMT genotypes with phenotypes, no significant influence of age and sex on TPMT activity, and an equal distribution of ITPA variants among various TPMT subgroups.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: risk factors for thiopurine-induced leukopenia in IBD

BACKGROUND

Thiopurine-induced leukopenia, a frequently observed and potentially life-threatening adverse event, complicates the clinical management of IBD patients.

AIM

To assess risk factors for thiopurine-induced leukopenia in IBD.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS and Cochrane library were searched for studies reporting at least one risk factor for thiopurine-induced leukopenia. Pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated for each potential risk factor using a random effects model. Studies that were not eligible for meta-analysis were described qualitatively.

RESULTS

Seventy articles were included, 34 (11 229 patients) were included in meta-analyses. A significantly higher thiopurine-induced leukopenia risk was found for TPMT (OR 3.9, 95% [CI] 2.5-6.1) and for NUDT15 R139C (OR 6.9, 95% CI 5.2-9.1), G52A (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.3-7.9) and 36_37ins/delGGAGTC variant carriers (OR 5.6, 95% CI 2.8-11.4). A potential association between high 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) or 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) levels and leukopenia was observed, since most studies reported higher metabolite levels in leukopenic patients (6-TGN: 204-308 (Lennard method) and 397 (Dervieux method), 6-MMP: 4020-10 450 pmol/8 x 10⁸ RBC) compared to controls (6-TGN: 170-212 (Lennard method) and 269 (Dervieux method), 6-MMP: 1025-4550 pmol/8 x 10⁸ RBC).

CONCLUSIONS

TPMT and NUDT15 variants predict thiopurine-induced leukopenia. High 6-TGN and 6-MMP levels might induce leukopenia, although exact cut-off values remain unclear. Potential preventive measures to reduce the risk of thiopurine-induced leukopenia include pre-treatment TPMT and NUDT15 genotyping. Routine thiopurine metabolite measurement might be efficient, yet cut-off levels must be validated in advance.

Azathioprine Biotransformation in Young Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Contribution of Glutathione-S Transferase M1 and A1 Variants

The contribution of candidate genetic variants involved in azathioprine biotransformation on azathioprine efficacy and pharmacokinetics in 111 young patients with inflammatory bowel disease was evaluated. Azathioprine doses, metabolites thioguanine-nucleotides (TGN) and methylmercaptopurine-nucleotides (MMPN) and clinical effects were assessed after at least 3 months of therapy. Clinical efficacy was defined as disease activity score below 10. Candidate genetic variants (TPMT rs1142345, rs1800460, rs1800462, GSTA1 rs3957357, GSTM1, and GSTT1 deletion) were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays and pyrosequencing. Statistical analysis was performed using linear mixed effects models for the association between the candidate variants and the pharmacological variables (azathioprine doses and metabolites). Azathioprine metabolites were measured in 257 samples (median 2 per patient, inter-quartile range IQR 1-3). Clinical efficacy at the first evaluation available resulted better in ulcerative colitis than in Crohn’s disease patients (88.0% versus 52.5% responders, p = 0.0003, linear mixed effect model, LME). TGN concentration and the ratio TGN/dose at the first evaluation were significantly higher in responder. TPMT rs1142345 variant (4.8% of patients) was associated with increased TGN (LME p = 0.0042), TGN/dose ratio (LME p < 0.0001), decreased azathioprine dose (LME p = 0.0087), and MMPN (LME p = 0.0011). GSTM1 deletion (58.1% of patients) was associated with a 18.5% decrease in TGN/dose ratio (LME p = 0.041) and 30% decrease in clinical efficacy (LME p = 0.0031). GSTA1 variant (12.8% of patients) showed a trend (p = 0.046, LME) for an association with decreased clinical efficacy; however, no significant effect on azathioprine pharmacokinetics could be detected. In conclusion, GSTs variants are associated with azathioprine efficacy and pharmacokinetics.

Combined evaluation of genotype and phenotype of thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) in the clinical management of patients in chronic therapy with azathioprine

Background The thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT)/azathioprine (AZA) gene-drug pair is one of the most well-known pharmacogenetic markers. Despite this, few studies investigated the implementation of TPMT testing and the combined evaluation of genotype and phenotype in multidisciplinary clinical settings where patients are undergoing chronic therapy with AZA. Methods A total of 356 AZA-treated patients for chronic autoimmune diseases were enrolled. DNA was isolated from whole blood and the samples were analyzed for the c.460G>A and c.719A>G variants by the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) technique and sequenced for the c.238G>C variant. The TPMT enzyme activity was determined in erythrocytes by a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay. Results All the patients enrolled were genotyped while the TPMT enzyme activity was assessed in 41 patients. Clinical information was available on 181 patients. We found no significant difference in the odds of having adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in wild-type patients and variant allele carriers, but the latter had an extra risk of experiencing hematologically adverse events. The enzyme activity was significantly associated to genotype. Conclusions TPMT variant allele carriers have an extra risk of experiencing hematologically adverse events compared to wild-type patients. Interestingly, only two out of 30 (6.6%) patients had discordant results between genotype, phenotype and onset of ADRs.

Practical Management of Immunosuppressants in Dermatology

The treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases is challenging because of their frequency and complexity. Treatment of these diseases is based on the suppression of the patient's immune system using corticosteroids, corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents, and biologic drugs, making an understanding of the management of immunosuppressive therapy essential. Before an immunosuppressive agent is prescribed, a study must be carried out to identify contraindications, detect latent infections, and determine the most appropriate dose. During treatment, regular monitoring is required to detect adverse effects. The clinician must be familiar with the time lag between start of treatment and onset of the immunosuppressive effect as well as the maximum recommended duration of treatment and cumulative dose for each drug. As dermatologists we are accustomed to using these immunosuppressive agents, but we should have a good knowledge of the guidelines for their use and the monitoring required in each case if we are to reduce variability and avoid potentially serious adverse effects.

Pharmacogenetics of inflammatory bowel disease: a focus on Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease is an inflammatory bowel disease showing a high heterogeneity in phenotype and a strong genetic component. The treatment is complex, due to different severity of clinical parameters and to the fact that therapies only permit to control symptoms and to induce remission for short periods. Moreover, all categories of drugs present a great interindividual variability both in terms of efficacy and side effects appearance. For this reason, the identification of specific genomic biomarkers involved in drugs response will be of great clinical utility in order to foresee drug's efficacy and to prevent adverse reactions, permitting a more personalized therapeutic approach. In this review, we focus the attention on the pharmacogenetic studies regarding drugs commonly utilized in Crohn's disease treatment.

Comparison of 6-mercaptopurine with 6-thioguanine for the analysis of thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity in human erythrocyte by LC-MS/MS

Thiopurines (TPDs) are first-line drugs in treating neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). Evaluation of thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity (TPMT), a major determinant of TPD toxicity, before TPD treatment using 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) and 6-thioguanine (6-TG) as substrate was suggested. However, the equivalent of the two substrates in TPMT activity evaluation was unknown, and an alternative substrate was required in TPMT activity evaluation in patients who were already taking 6-MP or 6-TG. Before evaluating the agreement of 6-MP and 6-TG in TPMT activity measurement in patients with NMOSD, the affinity of the two substrates for the active center of TPMT should be established. A computer-based simulation indicated that 6-MP and 6-TG had similar affinities for the two active sites of TPMT. According to the guidelines, an LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated to evaluate the TPMT activity in human erythrocyte hemolysate using 6-MP or 6-TG as substrates via 1 h incubation at 37°C. The method was applied in 81 patients with NMOSD. Evaluated by Bland-Altman plot, 6-methylmercaptopurine and 6-methylthioguanine represented TPMT activities were in agreement with each other. Further studies are warranted to confirm the results.

The glutathione transferase Mu null genotype leads to lower 6-MMPR levels in patients treated with azathioprine but not with mercaptopurine

The conversion of azathioprine (AZA) to mercaptopurine (MP) is mediated by glutathione transferase Mu1 (GSTM1), alpha1 (GSTA1) and alpha2 (GSTA2). We designed a case-control study with data from the TOPIC trial to explore the effects of genetic variation on steady state 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide (6-MMPR) and 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) metabolite levels. We included 199 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (126 on AZA and 73 on MP). GSTM1-null genotype carriers on AZA had two-fold lower 6-MMPR levels than AZA users carrying one or two copies of GSTM1 (2239 (1006-4587) versus 4371 (1897-7369) pmol/8 × 10⁸ RBCs; P<0.01). In patients on MP (control group) 6-MMPR levels were comparable (6195 (1551-10712) versus 6544 (1717-11600) pmol/8 × 10⁸ RBCs; P=0.84). The 6-TGN levels were not affected by the GSTM1 genotype. The presence of genetic variants in GSTA1 and GSTA2 was not related to the 6-MMPR and 6-TGN levels.

Glutathione-dependent micelles based on carboxymethyl chitosan for delivery of doxorubicin

Novel glutathione (GSH)-dependent micelles based on carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCS) were developed for triggered intracellular release of doxorubicin (DOX). DOX-33'-Dithiobis (N-hydroxysuccinimidyl propionate)-CMCS (DOX-DSP-CMCS) prodrugs were synthesized. DOX was attached to the amino group on CMCS via disulfide bonds and drug-loaded micelles were formed by self-assembly. The micelles formed core-shell structure with CMCS and DOX as the shell and core, respectively, in aqueous media. The structure of the prodrugs was confirmed by IR and proton nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H NMR) spectroscopy. The drug-loading capacity determined by UV spectrophotometry was 4.96% and the critical micelle concentration of polymer prodrugs determined by pyrene fluorescence was 0.089 mg/mL. Micelles were spherical and the mean size of the nanoparticles was 174 nm, with a narrow polydispersity index of 0.106. Moreover, in vitro drug release experiments showed that the micelles were highly GSH-sensitive owing to the reductively degradable disulfide bonds. Cell counting kit (CCK-8) assays revealed that DOX-DSP-CMCS micelles exhibited effective cytotoxicity against HeLa cells. Moreover, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) demonstrated that DOX-DSP-CMCS micelles could efficiently deliver and release DOX in the cancer cells. In conclusion, the DOX-DSP-CMCS nanosystem is a promising drug delivery vehicle for cancer therapy.