Perioperative pelvic floor muscle training did not improve outcomes in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a randomised trial

Pelvic floor muscle training for urinary symptoms, vaginal prolapse, sexual function, pelvic floor muscle strength, and quality of life after hysterectomy: a systematic review with meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

After hysterectomy, women could experience pelvic floor dysfunction and negative impact on quality of life, which could be improved by pelvic floor muscle training.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate effects of pelvic floor muscle training on urinary symptoms, vaginal prolapse, sexual function, pelvic floor muscle strength, and quality of life after hysterectomy.

METHODS

Systematic review with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Trials with pelvic floor muscle training in women after hysterectomy were included. The outcomes measures were urinary symptoms, vaginal prolapse, sexual function, pelvic floor muscle strength, and quality of life. Quality of evidence was assessed by adopting the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Six trials, involving 776 participants, were included. The mean PEDro score of trials was 5.5. Moderate-quality evidence suggested that pelvic floor muscle training improves sexual function by 5 points (95% CI: 4, 6) on the Female Sexual Function Index, compared with no intervention. It might affect strength (SMD 0.5; 95% CI: -0.4, 1.3), quality of life (SMD 0.5 points out of 108, 95% CI: -0.1, 0.9), urinary symptoms (RD -0.02; 95% CI: -0.06, 0.1); however, the estimates were too imprecise. In addition, it produces no or negligible effects on vaginal prolapse (RD 0; 95% CI: -0.1, 0.1). Long-term effects remain uncertain.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review provides moderate-quality evidence that pelvic floor muscle training is effective for improving women's sexual function after hysterectomy, in comparison with no intervention. Benefits on urinary symptoms, pelvic floor muscle strength, quality of life, and vaginal prolapse remains unclear. Also, the effects beyond the intervention period remains uncertain.

Pelvic floor muscle training vs radiofrequency for women with vaginal laxity: randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Vaginal laxity (VL) is a complaint of excessive vaginal looseness with a prevalence ranging from 24% to 38% across studies.

AIM

The study sought to compare the effect of radiofrequency (RF) and pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) on the treatment of women with VL.

METHODS

From February 2020 to December 2021, a prospective, parallel, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial was carried out in women ≥18 years of age and complaining of VL in a tertiary hospital. Two groups (RF and PFMT) were evaluated at the beginning of the study and 30 days and 6 months postintervention. A total of 42 participants per arm was sufficient to demonstrate a difference in sexual function on the Female Sexual Function Index at 90% power, 1-sided type 1 error of 0.025 with a noninferiority margin of 4 on the FSFI total score. Analysis was intention-to-treat and per-protocol based.

OUTCOMES

The primary endpoint was the change of FSFI score after treatment, and the secondary outcomes were improvement in symptoms of VL and changes in questionnaire scores of sexual distress, vaginal symptoms, and urinary incontinence, in the quantification of pelvic organ prolapse, and pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contraction.

RESULTS

Of 167 participants recruited, 87 were included (RF: n = 42; PFMT: n = 45). All questionnaires improved (P < .05) their total scores and subscales in both groups and during the follow-ups. After 30 days of treatment, RF was noninferior to PFMT to improving FSFI total score (mean difference -0.08 [95% confidence interval, -2.58 to 2.42]) in the per-protocol analysis (mean difference -0.46 [95% confidence interval, -2.92 to 1.99]) and in the intention-to-treat analysis; however, this result was not maintained after 6 months of treatment. PFM contraction improved significantly in both groups (RF: P = .006, 30 days; P = .049, 6 months; PFMT: P < .001, 30 days and 6 months), with better results in the PFMT group.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Sexual, vaginal, and urinary symptoms were improved after 30 days and 6 months of treatment with RF and PFMT; however, better results were observed in the PFMT group after 6 months.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

The present randomized clinical trial used several validated questionnaires evaluating quality of life, sexual function and urinary symptoms, in addition to assessing PFM contraction and classifying the quantification of pelvic organ prolapse aiming at anatomical changes in two follow-up periods. The limitations were the lack of a sham-controlled group (third arm) and the difficulty of blinding researchers to assess treatments due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION

After 30 days and 6 months of treatment, sexual, vaginal, and urinary symptoms improved with RF and PFMT; however, better results were observed in the PFMT group after 6 months. RF was noninferior to PFMT in improving FSFI total score after 30 days; however, this result was not maintained after 6 months of treatment.

Pelvic floor muscle training as a method of prevention and treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction and genital prolapse

Relevance. Pelvic floor dysfunction and pelvic organ prolapse are a significant problem today - even the initial manifestations of pelvic floor dysfunction can lead to reduced quality of sexual life, decreased activity, and then to social isolation and decreased self-esteem of women. Due to the growth of general life expectancy, the incidence rate is also increasing. One of the most popular conservative treatments for pelvic floor dysfunction is pelvic floor muscle training. The aim of this literature review is to consolidate the scattered information about the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training as a prevention and treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction. Materials and Methods. In writing the review, publications from the PubMed and Google Scholar databases from January 2019 were analyzed and systematized. Results and Discussion. Pelvic floor muscle training is one of the most prospective methods of non-invasive treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. It can take many forms and is represented by a range of different techniques: from the simple short-term muscle contraction and Kegel exercises to more complex and high-tech methods using electromyostimulation and biofeedback. However, timing of introduction and method for pelvic floor muscle training must be carefully considered in order to gain the maximum result. Conclusion. Based on the study, it can be concluded that the introduction of pelvic floor muscle training as part of prenatal care and in the antenatal period is the most appropriate way to prevent pelvic floor failure and genital prolapse. Further research is required to confirm the hypothesis.

International urogynecology consultation chapter 3 committee 2; conservative treatment of patient with pelvic organ prolapse: Pelvic floor muscle training

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

This manuscript from Chapter 3 of the International Urogynecology Consultation (IUC) on Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) describes the current evidence and suggests future directions for research on the effect of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in prevention and treatment of POP.

METHODS

An international group of four physical therapists, four urogynecologists and one midwife/basic science researcher performed a search of the literature using pre-specified search terms on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Ovid Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, PEDro and Scopus databases for publications between 1996 and 2021. Full publications or expanded abstracts in English or in other languages with abstracts in English were included. The PEDro rating scale (0-10) was used to evaluate study quality. Included RCTs were reviewed to summarize the evidence in six key sections: (1) evidence for PFMT in prevention of POP in the general female population; (2) evidence for early intervention of PFMT in the peripartum period for prevention and treatment of POP; (3) evidence for PFMT in treatment of POP in the general female population; (4) evidence for perioperative PFMT; (5) evidence for PFMT on associated conditions in women with POP; (6) evidence for the long-term effect of PFMT on POP. Full publications in English or in other languages with abstracts in English and expanded abstracts presented at international condition specific societies were included. Internal validity was examined by the PEDro rating scale (0-10).

RESULTS

After exclusion of duplicates and irrelevant trials, we classified and included 2 preventive trials, 4 trials in the post-partum period, 11 treatment trials of PFMT for POP in the general female population in comparison with no treatment or lifestyle interventions, 10 on PFMT as an adjunct treatment to POP surgery and 9 long-term treatment trials. Only three treatment studies compared PFMT with the use of a pessary. The RCTs scored between 4 and 8 on the PEDro scale. No primary prevention studies were found, and there is sparse and inconsistent evidence for early intervention in the postpartum period. There is good evidence/recommendations from 11 RCTs that PFMT is effective in reducing POP symptoms and/or improving POP stage (by one stage) in women with POP-Q stage I, II and III in the general female population, but no evidence from 9/10 RCTs that adding PFMT pre- and post -surgery for POP is effective. There are few long-term follow-up studies, and results are inconsistent. There are no serious adverse effects or complications reported related to PFMT.

CONCLUSIONS

There are few studies on prevention and in the postpartum period, and the effect is inconclusive. There is high-level evidence from 11 RCTs to recommend PFMT as first-line treatment for POP in the general female population. PFMT pre- and post-POP surgery does not seem to have any additional effect on POP. PFMT is effective and safe but needs thorough instruction and supervision to be effective.

Effects of Pelvic-Floor Muscle Training in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Approached with Surgery vs. Conservative Treatment: A Systematic Review

The aim of this systematic review was to explore the effectiveness of pelvic-floor muscle training (PFMT) in the treatment of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) who had undergone either surgery or only conservative treatment, based on a selection of randomized clinical trials (RCT). The search was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, CINAHL, and PEDro databases between April 2021 and October 2021 using the following MeSH terms or keywords: “pelvic organ prolapse”, “POP”, “pelvic floor muscle training”, “pelvic floor muscle exercise”, “kegel exercise”, and “surgery”. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the PEDro scale. Eighteen RCTs were included in this review. The findings showed improvements in symptoms associated with POP, in pelvic-floor function, and in quality of life in women who performed a PFMT protocol. However, PFMT did not produce significant changes in sexual function, and the results of the change in POP stage were inconclusive. When viewing PFMT as a complementary treatment to surgery, no significant improvements were observed in any of the analyzed variables. In conclusion, a PFMT program is an effective way to improve the pelvic, urinary, and intestinal symptoms associated with POP; function of the pelvic floor; and quality of life. PFMT as an adjunct to surgery does not seem to provide a greater benefit than surgical treatment alone. RCTs of higher methodological quality, with a larger sample size and a longer follow-up, are needed to confirm the results.

Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by the Downregulation of the Expression of Mitofusin 2 in Uterosacral Ligament Tissue via Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Background: The relationship between pelvic organ prolapse (POP), an aging-related disease, and the senescence-related protein mitofusin 2 (Mfn2) has rarely been studied. The aim of the present study was to explore the therapeutic effects of the downregulation of Mfn2 expression by stem cells on POP through animal experiments. Methods: First, a rat POP model was constructed by ovariectomy and traction. The rats in the non-pelvic organ prolapse (NPOP) and POP groups were divided into four groups for negative controls (N1−N4, N1: NPOP-normal saline; N2: NPOP-untransfected stem cells; N3: NPOP-short hairpin negative control (NPOP-sh-NC); N4: NPOP-short hairpin-Mfn2 (NPOP-sh-Mfn2)), and four groups for prolapse (P1−P4, P1: POP-normal saline; P2: POP-untransfected stem cells; P3: POP-sh-NC; P4: POP-sh-Mfn2), respectively. Stem cells were then cultured and isolated. The expression of Mfn2 was inhibited by lentivirus transfection, and the stem cells were injected into the uterosacral ligament of the rats in each group. The expression levels of Mfn2 and procollagen 1A1/1A2/3A1 in the uterosacral ligaments of the rats were observed at 0, 7, 14, and 21 days after injection. Results: Compared to the rats in the NPOP group, the POP rats had significant prolapse. The Mfn2 expression in the uterosacral ligaments of the POP rats was significantly increased (p < 0.05, all), and the expression of procollagen 1A1/1A2/3A1 was significantly decreased (p < 0.001, all). The POP rat model maintained the same trend after 21 days (without stem cell injection). At day 14, compared to the rats in the N1 group, the Mfn2 expression in the uterosacral ligament of the rats in the N4 group was significantly decreased (p < 0.05, all), and the expression of procollagens was significantly increased (p < 0.05, all). Similarly, compared to the rats in the P1 group, the Mfn2 expression in the uterosacral ligament of the rats in the P4 group was significantly decreased (p < 0.05, all), and the expression of procollagens was significantly increased (p < 0.05, all). Similarly, on day 21, the Mfn2 mRNA and protein expression in the uterosacral ligament of the POP and NPOP rats was significantly decreased (p < 0.05, all), and the expression of procollagens was significantly increased (p < 0.05, all) in the rats in the sh-Mfn2 group (N4, P4) compared to the rats in the saline group (N1, P1). Conclusions: The downregulation of Mfn2 expression by stem cells decreased the expression of Mfn2 and increased the expression of procollagen1A1/1A2/3A1 in the uterosacral ligament of the POP rats; this effect was significant 14−21 days after the injection. Thus, Mfn2 may be a new target for POP control.

Postoperative Physiotherapy in Women Undergoing Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Purpose: Postoperative physiotherapy in conjunction with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery is still under-investigated and controversial. In this randomized controlled trial, pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and abdominal training were compared with a control condition (standard in-hospital treatment). Method: Eighty-one women were randomized to one of three groups. The Prolapse Quality of Life questionnaire, two-dimensional ultrasound, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System scale, the PERFECT (power, endurance, repetitions, fast contractions, every contraction timed) scheme, electromyography, Sahrmann scale, and pressure biofeedback unit (PBU) were used to measure quality of life (QOL), POP, and pelvic floor and abdominal muscle function. A mixed-model analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for analysis. Results: Beneficial effects (p < 0.05) were found for the PFMT group - increased power, number of fast contractions, amount of movement, endurance, and Sahrmann and PBU measures - compared with the control group. Abdominal training led to a significant (p < 0.05) increase in bulging and discomfort, number of pelvic floor muscle contractions, and Sahrmann and PBU measures compared with the control condition; both groups showed significantly increased urinary frequency (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Postoperative physiotherapy did not have a beneficial effect on QOL or POP symptoms. PFMT and abdominal training had beneficial effects on pelvic floor muscle function and abdominal muscle measures. Additional abdominal training led to increased symptoms.

Image Enhancement Algorithm-Based Ultrasound on Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Training in Preventing Postpartum Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

In order to explore the application value of image enhancement algorithm in evaluating pelvic floor rehabilitation training in the prevention of postpartum female pelvic floor dysfunction (FPFD), 70 patients with FPFD were selected as the study subjects and randomly divided into two groups. One group received routine nursing (control group, n = 35), and the other group received pelvic floor rehabilitation training based on routine nursing (experimental group, n = 35). In ultrasound images based on an image enhancement algorithm, the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) were used to evaluate the efficacy. The results showed that after image enhancement algorithm processing, the image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity index (SSIM) of ultrasound images of patients with FPFD were significantly improved (P < 0.05); the mean square error (MSE) was significantly decreased (P < 0.05); the diagnostic accuracy of FPFD in the original ultrasound images was 73.34%, and that after image enhancement algorithm processing was significantly improved to be 89.86% (P < 0.05). In addition, the overall clinical response rate of FPFD in the experimental group (82.86%) was obviously higher than that in the control group (51.43%) (P < 0.05). After rehabilitation training, the ICIQ-SF and PFDI-20 scores of patients with FPFD in the two groups suggested a significant decrease (P < 0.05). In summary, using an image enhancement algorithm has a good application prospect in evaluating pelvic floor rehabilitation training in preventing postpartum FPFD and is worthy of further promotion.

Completeness of exercise reporting among randomized controlled trials on pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review

AIMS

This systematic review aimed to assess the completeness of exercise reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, CINHAL, Embase, SCOPUS, and PEDro databases were searched up to October 2020. Full-text RCTs comparing PFMT to any type of intervention among women with any type and stage of POP were eligible for inclusion. Completeness of intervention was evaluated with t20he template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) and the consensus on exercise reporting template (CERT). Inter-rater agreement for each item of the tools was calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-six RCTs were included. None of the studies completely reported all intervention descriptors. On average 57.1% (6.8 ± 2.4; out of 12) of the overall TIDieR items and 35.3% (6.7 ± 2.9; out of 19) of the CERT were well described. In particular, 7 and 5 items were completely reported more than 50% of the time for the TIDieR and CERT, respectively. Frequent shortcomings were the undetailed reporting of information regarding tailoring and modifications of exercises and their adherence. Detailed descriptions of exercise repetitions to enable replication were missing in 53.8%. According to the CERT, only 11.5% of the RCTs sufficiently described the main providers' characteristics.

CONCLUSION

The completeness of PFMT reporting for women with POP is still below desirable standards and it is insufficient to ensure transferability into practice. The present results may add relevant knowledge and contribute to improving adequate reporting of exercise.

The effect of preoperative pelvic floor muscle training on urinary and colorectal-anal distress in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery-a randomized controlled trial

Introduction and hypothesis

Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) improves urinary incontinence and mild pelvic organ prolapse (POP). We aimed to investigate the effect of preoperative PFMT on urinary and colorectal-anal distress and related quality of life (QoL) in women with severe POP scheduled for surgery.

Methods

Randomized controlled trial of 159 women scheduled for POP surgery (intervention = 81, controls = 78). Intervention consisted of daily PFMT from inclusion to the day of surgery. Symptoms and QoL were assessed at inclusion, day of surgery and 6 months postoperatively using the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6), Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI-8), Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ) and Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ) (range 0–100). Mixed model statistical analyses were used.

Results

One hundred fifty-one (95%) women completed the study (intervention = 75, controls = 76). Mean waiting times until surgery and follow-up were 22 and 28 weeks. There was no difference in mean postoperative symptom and QoL scores (95% CI) between the intervention and control group: UDI-6 16 (12–21) vs. 17 (13–22), CRADI-8 15 (11–18) vs. 13 (10–16), UIQ 11 (7–15) vs. 10 (6–13) and CRAIQ 5 (2–7) vs. 6 (4–9), all p > 0.05. Overall mean scores were reduced from baseline to postoperative follow-up: UDI-6 37 (33–41) vs. 17 (14–20), CRADI-8 22 (19–25) vs. 14 (11–16); UIQ 28 (24–32) vs. 10 (7–13) and CRAIQ 16 (12–19) vs. 5 (3–7), all p < 0.01.

Conclusions

We found no added effect of preoperative PFMT on symptoms or QoL related to urinary and colorectal-anal distress in women scheduled for POP surgery. They achieved symptomatic improvement postoperatively regardless of PFMT.

Clinical trial registration

The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov: NCT 03,064,750.

Impact of pelvic floor muscle training in pelvic organ prolapse

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

This review article was aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) during conservative management and as an adjunct to prolapse surgery based on recently published articles.

METHODS

The PubMed and PEdro databases were searched from 2005 to 2020 for all types of studies reporting on PFMT as the primary treatment for conservative management of prolapse as well as an adjunct for prolapse surgery.

RESULT

The result of this review demonstrated that PFMT is effective in conservative management, especially in women with mild to moderate prolapse(stages I-III), for those who wish to have more children, who are not willing to undergo surgery, who are frail because of co-morbidities, and for those who need to delay surgery. However, results evaluating the effectiveness of PFMT as an adjunct to surgery demonstrated insufficient evidence to support the benefit of PFMT in addition to prolapse surgery over the use of surgery alone.

CONCLUSION

Through this review, we have concluded that PFMT shows a more prominent effect when applied as conservative management. Currently available evidence demonstrated no additional clinically significant augmentation of PFMT as an adjunct to surgery compared with prolapse surgery alone.

Impact of COVID-19 in Female Urology

This review discusses the impact of COVID-19 in Female Urology, revises the most important disorders in this field and how their diagnosis and treatment may be modified due to the current pandemic. The text also discusses new options such as telemedicine and what clinical situations within Female Urology should be of utmost importance for the urologist to be careful about. We also discuss how surgeries are being postponed are resumed according to the local scenario.