1
|
Reddy P, Plozza T, Scalisi A, Ezernieks V, Goodwin I, Rochfort S. Zonal Chemical Signal Pathways Mediating Floral Induction in Apple. Metabolites 2024; 14:251. [PMID: 38786728 PMCID: PMC11123431 DOI: 10.3390/metabo14050251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Phytohormones that trigger or repress flower meristem development in apple buds are thought to be locally emitted from adjacent plant tissues, including leaves and fruitlets. The presence of fruitlets is known to inhibit adjacent buds from forming flowers and thus fruits. The resulting absence of fruitlets the following season restores flower-promoting signalling to the new buds. The cycle can lead to a biennial bearing behaviour of alternating crop loads in a branch or tree. The hormonal stimuli that elicit flowering is typically referred to as the floral induction (FI) phase in bud meristem development. To determine the metabolic pathways activated in FI, young trees of the cultivar 'Ruby Matilda' were subjected to zonal crop load treatments imposed to two leaders of bi-axis trees in the 2020/2021 season. Buds were collected over the expected FI phase, which is within 60 DAFB. Metabolomics profiling was undertaken to determine the differentially expressed pathways and key signalling molecules associated with FI in the leader and at tree level. Pronounced metabolic differences were observed in trees and leaders with high return bloom with significant increases in compounds belonging to the cytokinin, abscisic acid (ABA), phenylpropanoid and flavanol chemical classes. The presence of cytokinins, namely adenosine, inosine and related derivatives, as well as ABA phytohormones, provides further insight into the chemical intervention opportunities for future crop load management strategies via plant growth regulators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka Reddy
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Tim Plozza
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Alessio Scalisi
- Tatura SmartFarm, Agriculture Victoria, Tatura, VIC 3616, Australia (I.G.)
| | - Vilnis Ezernieks
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Ian Goodwin
- Tatura SmartFarm, Agriculture Victoria, Tatura, VIC 3616, Australia (I.G.)
- Centre for Agricultural Innovation, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Simone Rochfort
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Belhassine F, Pallas B, Pierru-Bluy S, Martinez S, Fumey D, Costes E. A genotype-specific architectural and physiological profile is involved in the flowering regularity of apple trees. TREE PHYSIOLOGY 2022; 42:2306-2318. [PMID: 35951430 DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpac073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
In polycarpic plants, meristem fate varies within individuals in a given year. In perennials, the proportion of floral induction (FI) in meristems also varies between consecutive years and among genotypes of a given species. Previous studies have suggested that FI of meristems could be determined by the within-plant competition for carbohydrates and by hormone signaling as key components of the flowering pathway. At the genotypic level, variability in FI was also associated with variability in architectural traits. However, the part of genotype-dependent variability in FI that can be explained by either tree architecture or tree physiology is still not fully understood. This study aimed at deciphering the respective effect of architectural and physiological traits on FI variability within apple trees by comparing six genotypes with contrasted architectures. Shoot type demography as well as the flowering and fruit production patterns were followed over 6 years and characterized by different indexes. Architectural morphotypes were then defined based on architectural traits using a clustering approach. For two successive years, non-structural starch content in leaf, stem and meristems, and hormonal contents (gibberellins, cytokinins, auxin and abscisic acid) in meristems were quantified and correlated to FI within-tree proportions. Based on a multi-step regression analysis, cytokinins and gibberellins content in meristem, starch content in leaves and the proportion of long shoots in tree annual growth were shown to contribute to FI. Although the predictive linear model of FI was common to all genotypes, each of the explicative variables had a different weight in FI determination, depending on the genotype. Our results therefore suggest both a common determination model and a genotype-specific architectural and physiological profile linked to its flowering behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fares Belhassine
- AGAP Institut, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, TA A-108/01 Avenue d'Agropolis, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
- ITK, 34830, Clapiers, France
| | - Benoît Pallas
- AGAP Institut, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, TA A-108/01 Avenue d'Agropolis, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Sylvie Pierru-Bluy
- AGAP Institut, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, TA A-108/01 Avenue d'Agropolis, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Sébastien Martinez
- AGAP Institut, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, TA A-108/01 Avenue d'Agropolis, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | | | - Evelyne Costes
- AGAP Institut, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, TA A-108/01 Avenue d'Agropolis, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| |
Collapse
|