Letter to the Editor: Clinical versus statistical significance of pharmacogenomic-guided antidepressant therapy: What's really being measured and marketed?

Current level of evidence for improvement of antidepressant efficacy and tolerability by pharmacogenomic-guided treatment: A Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

The aim of the study was to assess the clinical utility of currently available pharmacogenomic (PGx) tools compared with treatment as usual (TAU), using a meta-analysis of dichotomous and continuous antidepressant efficacy and tolerability data from previously published clinical trials. MEDLINE, clinicaltrial.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, WHO ICTRP and CENTRAL were systematically searched; of the 962 results originally reviewed, 15 trials were included. Antidepressant efficacy was quantified by relative and absolute changes in symptom severity after eight weeks of treatment and by response and remission rates, while tolerability was estimated by the rate of study discontinuation for any reason. In the PGx-guided patients, symptom severity reduced by an average of 31.0% after eight weeks of treatment, compared to an average reduction of 26.8% in the TAU group. Accordingly, PGx-guided patients experienced a greater reduction in symptom severity of 3.4% (95%CI: 1.6-5.3%), which corresponded to a reduction in the Hamilton Depression score of 0.75 (0.30-1.21), a 37% (15-63%) higher remission rate, and an 18% (5-33%) higher response rate compared with TAU patients, while no difference was observed in discontinuation rate between groups. Notably, the majority of associations lost statistical significance when restricting the dataset to low risk of bias studies, while certain funnel plots suggested a potential publication bias favoring the reporting of statistically significant results. In summary, PGx tools marginally enhance antidepressant efficacy, but not antidepressant tolerability; thus, additional research and advancement of PGx tools are needed to improve integration of PGx in clinical pharmacotherapy of depression.

Perspectives on the success rate of current antidepressant pharmacotherapy

INTRODUCTION

There has been growing debate about the effectiveness of traditional antidepressants for the treatment of depression, and whether the clinical trials literature overstates the value of existing agents. Antidepressant efficacy is limited by suboptimal remission rates, lack of robust efficacy across diverse depressed subgroups, slow onset, and challenges managing tolerability. Clinicians can better navigate uncertainties in this area by recognizing patient-specific clinical and prognostic factors that influence the likelihood of antidepressant drug response.

AREAS COVERED

The author summarizes pertinent literature regarding drug-placebo differences in antidepressant outcome as well as patient-specific factors that influence antidepressant drug responsivity across subtypes of depressive disorders.

EXPERT OPINION

Standardized effect sizes for most monoaminergic antidepressants are relatively modest. At least one-third of treatment response derives from nonspecific (yet substantial) placebo effects, limiting the ability to compare antidepressant medication effects to that of "no treatment." Patients with high baseline depressive symptom severity are less likely to respond to placebo but may be more responsive to antidepressant pharmacotherapy than is the case in mild forms of depression. Patient satisfaction with antidepressant response must take into consideration not only efficacy for reducing symptoms but also drug tolerability/acceptability and tangible improvement in functional outcome and quality of life.

Tools for optimising pharmacotherapy in psychiatry (therapeutic drug monitoring, molecular brain imaging and pharmacogenetic tests): focus on antidepressants

Objectives: More than 40 drugs are available to treat affective disorders. Individual selection of the optimal drug and dose is required to attain the highest possible efficacy and acceptable tolerability for every patient.Methods: This review, which includes more than 500 articles selected by 30 experts, combines relevant knowledge on studies investigating the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics of 33 antidepressant drugs and of 4 drugs approved for augmentation in cases of insufficient response to antidepressant monotherapy. Such studies typically measure drug concentrations in blood (i.e. therapeutic drug monitoring) and genotype relevant genetic polymorphisms of enzymes, transporters or receptors involved in drug metabolism or mechanism of action. Imaging studies, primarily positron emission tomography that relates drug concentrations in blood and radioligand binding, are considered to quantify target structure occupancy by the antidepressant drugs in vivo. Results: Evidence is given that in vivo imaging, therapeutic drug monitoring and genotyping and/or phenotyping of drug metabolising enzymes should be an integral part in the development of any new antidepressant drug.Conclusions: To guide antidepressant drug therapy in everyday practice, there are multiple indications such as uncertain adherence, polypharmacy, nonresponse and/or adverse reactions under therapeutically recommended doses, where therapeutic drug monitoring and cytochrome P450 genotyping and/or phenotyping should be applied as valid tools of precision medicine.

A prospective study to determine the clinical utility of pharmacogenetic testing of veterans with treatment-resistant depression

BACKGROUND

Pharmacotherapies for depression are often ineffective and treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is common across bipolar disorder (BD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Patient genetic information can be used to predict treatment outcomes. Prospective studies indicate that pharmacogenetic (PGX) tests have utility in the treatment of depression. However, few studies have examined the utility of PGX in other diagnoses typified by depression, or in veterans, a cohort with high rates of medical comorbidity, social stress, and suicide.

AIM

To determine the efficacy of genetically guided pharmacological treatment of TRD.

METHODS

We conducted an 8-week, prospective, multisite, single-blind study in 182 veterans with TRD including patients with BD, MDD, and PTSD. Subjects were randomly assigned to PGX-guided treatment in which the clinician incorporated PGX information into decision-making, or treatment as usual (TAU).

RESULTS

Overall, the PGX group improved marginally faster compared to TAU, but the difference was not statistically significant. Secondary analyses revealed that only PTSD patients showed a potential benefit from PGX testing. Patients predicted by PGX testing to have moderate levels of genetic risk showed a significant benefit from the PGX-guided treatment, whereas other risk groups demonstrated no benefit. Clinicians generally found the PGX test was useful, particularly in more depressed patients and/or those with more warnings for significant or serious adverse outcomes. Clinicians more often used the results to select a drug, but only rarely to adjust dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

The data reveal possible group differences in the utility of PGX testing in veterans with TRD.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04469322.

Therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetics of antipsychotics and antidepressants in real life settings: A 5-year single centre experience

OBJECTIVES

Exposure and clinical response to CNS drugs are largely variable. AGNP guidelines suggest therapy individualisation with therapeutic drug monitoring of plasma concentrations and pharmacogenetic testing. We present the retrospective analysis of the last 5 years' data collected in real life settings as indirect evidence of the applications of the AGNP guidelines in the routine clinical management of psychiatric patients requiring pharmacologic treatments.

METHODS

Plasma concentrations were quantified using a liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method. Genomic DNA was isolated using an automatic DNA extraction system. All genotypes were determined by Real-Time PCR.

RESULTS

We collected a total of 4582 requests for TDM and 212 requests for pharmacogenetic analysis. A wide distribution in the trough concentrations was observed for most drugs indicating a high interpatient variability. Nearly 45% of the samples had trough levels below the minimum effective drug concentrations set by the AGNP guidelines; only 8% of the samples had high concentrations. For pharmacogenetics analysis, among antipsychotics, clozapine, haloperidol and aripiprazole were the most requested (78%); while for antidepressants SSRIs were the most frequently prescribed.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that physicians are becoming more confident with the laboratory pharmacologic tools to optimise treatments and/or that the pharmacological treatment of patients with psychiatric disorders is becoming more challenging. TDM and PGx might significantly contribute to the rational selection of the best drug and best dose in individual cases.

Towards precision medicine in generalized anxiety disorder: Review of genetics and pharmaco(epi)genetics

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a prevalent and chronic mental disorder that elicits widespread functional impairment. Given the high degree of non-response/partial response among patients with GAD to available pharmacological treatments, there is a strong need for novel approaches that can optimize outcomes, and lead to medications that are safer and more effective. Although investigations have identified interesting targets predicting treatment response through pharmacogenetics (PGx), pharmaco-epigenetics, and neuroimaging methods, these studies are often solitary, not replicated, and carry several limitations. This review provides an overview of the current status of GAD genetics and PGx and presents potential strategies to improve treatment response by combining better phenotyping with PGx and improved analytical methods. These strategies carry the dual benefit of delivering data on biomarkers of treatment response as well as pointing to disease mechanisms through the biology of the markers associated with response. Overall, these efforts can serve to identify clinical, genetic, and epigenetic factors that can be incorporated into a pharmaco(epi)genetic test that may ultimately improve treatment response and reduce the socioeconomic burden of GAD.