1
|
Francis R, Leavitt M, McLelland C, Hamilton DF. The influence of facemasks on communication in healthcare settings: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:637-649. [PMID: 36772816 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2176553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although a well-established aspect of healthcare practice, the impact of facemasks on verbal communication is surprisingly ambiguous. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search was conducted in APA PSYCHinfo, CINAHL, NHS Knowledge Network, Medline and SPORTDiscus databases from inception to November 2022 according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting an objective measure of speech understanding in adults, where information was transmitted or received whilst wearing a facemask were included. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa score. RESULTS Four hundred and thirty-three studies were identified, of which fifteen were suitable for inclusion, incorporating 350 participants with a median age of 49 (range 19 to 74) years. Wide heterogeneity of test parameters and outcome measurement prohibited pooling of data. 93% (14 of 15) studies reported a deleterious effect of facemasks on speech understanding, and 100% (5 of 5) of the included studies reported attenuation of sound with facemask usage. Background noise added further deleterious effects on speech understanding which was particularly problematic within hearing-impaired populations. Risk of bias in included studies varied but overall was modest. CONCLUSIONS Despite considerable complexity and heterogeneity in outcome measure, 93% (14 of 15) articles suggest respiratory protective equipment negatively affects speech understanding in normal hearing and hearing-impaired adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Francis
- School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Michael Leavitt
- School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Colin McLelland
- School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David F Hamilton
- Research Centre for Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bani M, Ardenghi S, Rampoldi G, Russo S, Strepparava MG. Impact of facemasks on psychotherapy: Clinician's confidence and emotion recognition. J Clin Psychol 2023; 79:1178-1191. [PMID: 36459660 PMCID: PMC9877818 DOI: 10.1002/jclp.23468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Facial emotion recognition is a key component of human interactions, and in clinical relationships contributes to building and maintaining the therapeutic alliance with patients. The introduction of facemasks has reduced the availability of facial information in private and professional relationships. This study aimed to assess the impact of facemasks on clinicians' perception of clinical interactions as well as their ability to read facial expressions. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, a purposive sample of 342 clinical psychologists or psychotherapists completed an online survey including the assessment of burnout, alexithymia, emotion dysregulation, and self-perceived ability to build effective relationships and communication with patients with/without facemasks. Participants were randomly assigned to the standardized facial emotion recognition task Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy FACES 2-Adult Faces including 24 faces representing anger, fear, sadness, and happiness. RESULTS Facemasks impaired the self-perceived ability of clinicians to build effective relationships and communicate with patients and reduced satisfaction in clinical encounters. The ability of clinicians to recognize facial emotions is significantly reduced for masked happy and angry faces, but not for sad and afraid ones. The perceived difficulty in building good relationships and communication with patients had a positive correlation with alexithymia and emotion dysregulation; higher levels of discomfort when wearing facemasks had a positive correlation with burnout and emotion dysregulation. CONCLUSION Facemasks reduced clinicians' self-confidence in clinical encounters with patients wearing facemasks, but their facial emotion recognition performance was only partially impaired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Bani
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza (MB), Italy
| | - Stefano Ardenghi
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza (MB), Italy
| | - Giulia Rampoldi
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza (MB), Italy
| | - Selena Russo
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza (MB), Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Strepparava
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza (MB), Italy.,Department of Mental Health, Clinical Psychology Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, ASST-Monza, Monza (MB), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Asbrand J, Gerdes S, Breedvelt J, Guidi J, Hirsch C, Maercker A, Douilliez C, Andersson G, Debbané M, Cieslak R, Rief W, Bockting C. Clinical Psychology and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed Methods Survey Among Members of the European Association of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Treatment (EACLIPT). CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY IN EUROPE 2023; 5:e8109. [PMID: 37064999 PMCID: PMC10103154 DOI: 10.32872/cpe.8109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has affected people globally both physically and psychologically. The increased demands for mental health interventions provided by clinical psychologists, psychotherapists and mental health care professionals, as well as the rapid change in work setting (e.g., from face-to-face to video therapy) has proven challenging. The current study investigates European clinical psychologists and psychotherapists' views on the changes and impact on mental health care that occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It further aims to explore individual and organizational processes that assist clinical psychologists' and psychotherapists' in their new working conditions, and understand their needs and priorities. Method Members of the European Association of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Treatment (EACLIPT) were invited (N = 698) to participate in a survey with closed and open questions covering their experiences during the first wave of the pandemic from June to September 2020. Participants (n = 92) from 19 European countries, mostly employed in universities or hospitals, completed the online survey. Results Results of qualitative and quantitative analyses showed that clinical psychologists and psychotherapists throughout the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic managed to continue to provide treatments for patients who were experiencing emotional distress. The challenges (e.g., maintaining a working relationship through video treatment) and opportunities (e.g., more flexible working hours) of working through this time were identified. Conclusions Recommendations for mental health policies and professional organizations are identified, such as clear guidelines regarding data security and workshops on conducting video therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Asbrand
- Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Samantha Gerdes
- NHS Veterans’ Mental Health and Wellbeing Service, Camden and Islington NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Josefien Breedvelt
- NatCen Social Research, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jenny Guidi
- Department of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Colette Hirsch
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Denmark Hill, Camberwell, London, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, Camberwell, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Maercker
- Department of Psychology, Division of Psychopathology and Clinical Intervention, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Wissenschaftskolleg Berlin–Institute of Advanced Study, Berlin, Germany
| | - Céline Douilliez
- Université catholique de Louvain, Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Gerhard Andersson
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Debbané
- Psychoanalysis Unit, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Developmental Clinical Psychology Unit, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Roman Cieslak
- Department of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Winfried Rief
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Claudi Bockting
- Centre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Calcagni N, Venier AG, Nasso R, Boudin G, Jarrige B, Parneix P, Quintard B. Respiratory infection prevention: perceptions, barriers and facilitators after SARS-CoV-2. Infect Dis Health 2023; 28:54-63. [PMID: 36123289 PMCID: PMC9420707 DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2022.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Respiratory hygiene, especially in context of COVID-19, is of upmost importance. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) play an important role in the prevention of infections. Their perceptions of the subject are needed to tailor effective communication and training on prevention. METHODS 20 French HCPs were questioned about their perceptions on respiratory hygiene and infections, by the means of recorded semi-structured interviews and a focus group. The interviews and focus group were transcribed then analysed through lexicometric and thematic content analyses. RESULTS HCP discourse revolved around the use of face masks, the prevention and the characteristics of respiratory infections and the means to prevent them.COVID-19 excepted, HCPs considered respiratory infections as benign. They associated respiratory hygiene to the observance of cough etiquette, the preservation of lung health, the act of protecting oneself and others, and the adherence to safety protocols. Main barriers to good practices were organizational ones, such as the lack of consultation and mobilization of HCPs in the development of preventive measures, suboptimal information sharing and the physical and relational constraints of face masks. They advised means of improving communication and information promotion. CONCLUSION Since the pandemic crisis, HCPs have developed a better awareness about the prevention of respiratory infections. Except for COVID-19, respiratory infections are mostly considered as benign. Barriers and facilitators evoked by HCPs will help to build national communication and tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Calcagni
- CHU de Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Anne-Gaëlle Venier
- Centre d'appui pour la prévention des infections associées aux soins, CPias Nouvelle-Aquitaine, CHU de Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Raymond Nasso
- Centre d'appui pour la prévention des infections associées aux soins, CPias Iles de Guadeloupe, F-97100 Pointe à Pitre, France
| | - Georges Boudin
- Centre d'appui pour la prévention des infections associées aux soins, CPias Nouvelle-Aquitaine, CHU de Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Bruno Jarrige
- Centre d'appui pour la prévention des infections associées aux soins, CPias Iles de Guadeloupe, F-97100 Pointe à Pitre, France
| | - Pierre Parneix
- Centre d'appui pour la prévention des infections associées aux soins, CPias Nouvelle-Aquitaine, CHU de Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Bruno Quintard
- Laboratoire de Psychologie EA 4139, Université de Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Erschens R, Adam SH, Weisshap C, Giel KE, Wallis H, Herrmann-Werner A, Festl-Wietek T, Mazurak N, Zipfel S, Junne F. The role of face masks within in-patient psychotherapy: Results of a survey among inpatients and healthcare professionals. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:1030397. [PMID: 36570852 PMCID: PMC9779913 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1030397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Face-to-face medical and psychotherapeutic treatments during the Corona pandemic often involve patients and health care providers wearing face masks. We performed a pilot survey assessing the subjective experience of wearing face masks during psychotherapy sessions regarding (i) feasibility, (ii) psychotherapeutic treatment and (iii) communication, emotion and working alliance in patients and healthcare professionals. Methods A total of n = 62 inpatients (RR = 95.4%) and n = 33 healthcare professionals (RR = 86.8%) at an academic department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy participated in this survey anonymously. The items of the questionnaire were created by the interprofessional expert team and were based on existing instruments: (i) the Therapeutic Relationship Questionnaire and (ii) the German translation of Yalom's Questionnaire on Experiencing in Group Psychotherapy. Results The majority of patients rate their psychotherapy as highly profitable despite the mask. In individual therapy, face masks seem to have a rather low impact on subjective experience of psychotherapy and the relationship to the psychotherapist. Most patients reported using alternative facial expressions and expressions. In the interactional group therapy, masks were rather hindering. On the healthcare professional side, there were more frequent negative associations of face masks in relation to (i) experiencing connectedness with colleagues, (ii) forming relationships, and (iii) therapeutic treatment. Discussion Information should be given to patients about the possible effects of face masks on the recognition of emotions, possible misinterpretations and compensation possibilities through alternative stimuli (e.g., eye area) and they should be encouraged to ask for further information. Especially in group therapy, with patients from other cultural backgrounds and in cases of need for help (e.g., hearing impairment) or complex disorders, appropriate non-verbal gestures and body language should be used to match the intended emotional expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Erschens
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sophia Helen Adam
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Chiara Weisshap
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Katrin Elisabeth Giel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hannah Wallis
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Anne Herrmann-Werner
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Tübingen Institute for Medical Education, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Teresa Festl-Wietek
- Tübingen Institute for Medical Education, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nazar Mazurak
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stephan Zipfel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Centre of Excellence for Eating Disorders Tüebingen (KOMET), Tübingen, Germany
| | - Florian Junne
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Veelen MJ, Voegele A, Rauch S, Kaufmann M, Brugger H, Strapazzon G. COVID-19 Pandemic in Mountainous Areas: Impact, Mitigation Strategies, and New Technologies in Search and Rescue Operations. High Alt Med Biol 2021; 22:335-341. [PMID: 34319777 PMCID: PMC8558066 DOI: 10.1089/ham.2020.0216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
van Veelen, Michiel J., Anna Voegele, Simon Rauch, Marc Kaufmann, Hermann Brugger, and Giacomo Strapazzon. COVID-19 pandemic in mountainous areas: impact, mitigation strategies, and new technologies in search and rescue operations. High Alt Med Biol. 22:335-341, 2021.-Mitigating the spread of COVID-19, an airborne infection, can lead to delays in the prehospital response and impair the performance of search and rescue (SAR) services in mountainous and remote areas. We provide an overview of the developing epidemiological situation related to the COVID-19 pandemic in mountainous areas and review current protocols to determine their suitability for mountain rescue teams. We also discuss using novel technologies to reduce the adverse effects caused by COVID-19 mitigation strategies such as delays caused by donning personal protective equipment (PPE) and reduced rescuer performance due to impaired movement and ventilation. COVID-19 has spread even in mountainous and remote locations. Dedicated protocols for the use of PPE appropriate for SAR rescuers exerting physical effort in remote areas and using technologies such as drones, telemedicine, and localization and contact tracing applications could contribute to an effective and timely emergency response in mountainous and remote settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel J. van Veelen
- Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy
- Emergency Medical Services (COVID-1 Intermediate Care Unit), Bolzano Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Anna Voegele
- Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Simon Rauch
- Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, “F. Tappeiner” Hospital, Merano, Italy
| | - Marc Kaufmann
- Emergency Medical Services (COVID-1 Intermediate Care Unit), Bolzano Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
- Emergency Medical Services 112, Health Care System Alto Adige, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Hermann Brugger
- Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Giacomo Strapazzon
- Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wyler H, Liebrenz M, Ajdacic-Gross V, Seifritz E, Young S, Burger P, Buadze A. Treatment provision for adults with ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic: an exploratory study on patient and therapist experience with on-site sessions using face masks vs. telepsychiatric sessions. BMC Psychiatry 2021; 21:237. [PMID: 33952229 PMCID: PMC8097668 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03236-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maintaining the therapeutic care of psychiatric patients during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland required changes to the way in which sessions were conducted, such as telepsychiatric interventions or using face masks during on-site sessions. While little is known about how face masks affect the therapeutic experience of patients and therapists, the effectiveness of telepsychiatry is well documented for several psychiatric disorders. However, research on the benefits of telepsychiatry in adult patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) remains scarce. This seems problematic since the symptoms typically associated with ADHD, such as attention problems and distractibility, may lessen the utility of telepsychiatry for this particular group. The present study's aim was to explore how adult patients with ADHD and their therapists experienced therapy sessions during the COVID-19 pandemic in three different settings: face-to-face with the therapist wearing a face mask, via telephone, or via videoconferencing. METHODS In this exploratory, quantitatively driven mixed-method study (quantitative questionnaire data and qualitative data from open-ended responses), we assessed patients' evaluation of the session, their treatment satisfaction, and patients' and therapists' ratings of therapeutic alliance. We also collected qualitative comments on both sides' experience of the session. Overall, 97 therapist and 66 patient questionnaires were completed. Results are reported for the N = 60 cases for which data from both parties were available. Sequential multiple regressions adjusted for therapist and number of sessions were used for the main quantitative analyses. RESULTS No statistically significant differences regarding session flow, post-session positivity, satisfaction and therapeutic alliance were observed. The only exception was that telepsychiatric sessions were rated as significantly less deep than face-to-face sessions, an effect that may decline over time, especially in the videoconferencing group. Patients and therapists identified similar facilitating and complicating aspects, but differed in their emphasis of specific elements. CONCLUSIONS Both settings, on-site with the therapist wearing a face mask and telepsychiatric, seem to be valid options to continue treatment of adults with ADHD during a situation such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Aspects such as patient preference, session content, and therapeutic methods may be useful to identify the most suitable modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Wyler
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Michael Liebrenz
- grid.5734.50000 0001 0726 5157Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross
- grid.7400.30000 0004 1937 0650Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Erich Seifritz
- grid.7400.30000 0004 1937 0650Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Susan Young
- Psychology Services Limited, London, UK ,grid.9580.40000 0004 0643 5232Department of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Pascal Burger
- grid.7400.30000 0004 1937 0650Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anna Buadze
- grid.7400.30000 0004 1937 0650Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|