Implementing cognitive remediation in substance use treatment: The impact of staff perceptions

Cognitive remediation therapy - implementation and translation into clinical practice in rural and metropolitan New South Wales mental health services

OBJECTIVE

Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT) is an effective intervention in managing the significant cognitive deficits experienced by those living with psychosis. Given its strong evidence base CRT is recommended in Australian and international guidelines for rehabilitation of people with psychosis, however, access to CRT remains limited. In this commentary, we describe recent efforts to implement CRT programs within NSW mental health services. Development of CRT delivery has been successfully achieved in both rural and metropolitan settings, utilising both face-to-face and telehealth methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The delivery of CRT in public mental health services is feasible and adaptable to diverse settings. We strongly advocate for sustainable implementation of CRT into routine clinical practice. This will require policy and practice change to enable resources for CRT training and delivery to become embedded in the roles of the clinical workforce.

Feasibility and pilot efficacy of cognitive remediation for people in residential substance use treatment

INTRODUCTION

There are high rates of cognitive impairment among people seeking treatment for problematic substance use, which is rarely addressed in treatment programs. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of the neuropsychological and educational approach to cognitive remediation (NEAR) in a residential substance treatment setting.

METHODS

A non-randomised trial conducted between November 2018 and November 2019, compared outcomes for 34 residents who received cognitive remediation (CR) plus treatment as usual (TAU) to 31 residents who received TAU only. Number of groups and attendance, and a measure of client satisfaction assessed feasibility. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline (service admission), and at 2 and 6 months post-admission.

RESULTS

A total of 95 CR groups were delivered over a 36-week time period with a high degree of treatment fidelity and acceptability to participants. Cognitive outcomes improved across both the CR+TAU and TAU groups by 2 months, which was maintained at 6 months for outcomes related to executive functioning. There were no significant differences between the CR+TAU and TAU groups at 2 or 6 months, although a large effect size and confidence intervals indicated a potentially larger change in cognitive flexibility after receiving CR.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

This study contributes to our understanding of the implementation of CR in the alcohol and other drug rehabilitation setting. It is feasible to incorporate the NEAR program in treatment. The small sample size and lower than expected treatment dose likely contributed to the lack of significant findings.