Current concepts in the surgical management of primary glenohumeral arthritis with a biconcave glenoid

A comparative analysis of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for posterior glenoid wear patterns

Introduction

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) are well-known methods of treating glenohumeral arthritis, which often leads to posterior wear of the glenoid. This study compared minimum two-year outcome measures in patients treated with RSA and TSA for Walch B2 and B3 glenoids.

Methods

Thirty-eight shoulders underwent TSA and 40 shoulders underwent RSA by two fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons at a tertiary referral center.

Results

The mean time for follow-up was 25.9 months and 25.5 months for RSA and TSA groups, respectively (P = 0.47). The RSA group consisted of 27 males and 13 females; whereas the TSA group had 37 males and 1 female (P = <0.001). The mean age for RSA was 71 years old, 61 years for TSA (P = <0.001). TSA patients demonstrated superior average active external rotation (47° vs 40°; P = 0.003) and internal rotation (60° vs 52°; P = 0.002). Active forward elevation did not significantly differ. The TSA group had 7 (18.4 %) postoperative complications, the RSA group had 3 (7.5 %) (P = 0.27). The most common complication was cephalic vein thrombosis. No complication required revision.

Conclusions

Patients with shoulder osteoarthritis and posterior glenoid wear patterns with an intact rotator cuff who underwent TSA had similar outcomes as RSA. While the TSA group had superior active external rotation and internal rotation at 2 years postoperative compared with RSA, the 2-year active forward elevation was equivalent. Both groups had similar 2-year outcomes for strength in all planes and in all three clinical-outcome scoring systems. The TSA group demonstrated a higher incidence of postoperative complications. Neither group required reoperations. These results indicate that TSA and RSA can be safely utilized in posterior glenoid wear patterns with good clinical outcomes.

Level of evidence

Level III; Retrospective cohort study.

CT imaging findings in symptomatic patients with and without revision surgery after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate CT imaging findings in symptomatic patients with and without revision surgery (RS) after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, two radiologists assessed CT imaging findings in symptomatic patients with RSA over 5 years, including material fracture and loosening of the peg, baseplate, screws, and humeral stem, screw positioning, prosthesis dislocation, glenoid notching, fractures, and deltoid muscle quality. The primary outcome parameter was RS. Patients were assigned Group 1 (RS) or Group 2 (No RS).

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients (mean age 70.4 ± 10.3 years, 61 females) met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-two patients (29 females) received RS after 34.0 ± 38.3 months. The only CT imaging finding significantly associated with RS was prosthesis dislocation (P = .007, odds ratio (OR) 10.95, 95% CI 1.34-89.24). All other evaluated CT imaging findings were not associated with RS. Yet, loosening of the peg (30% vs. 16%), baseplate (15% vs. 6%), and superior screw (18% vs. 7%) and periprosthetic humeral fractures (29% vs. 13%)-as common reasons for RS-were more frequent in patients with RS than in those without, however not reaching significance (P ≥ .11). The large majority of patients had glenoid notching (79% vs. 94%), irrespective of RS.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of symptomatic patients after RSA, prosthesis dislocation was the only CT imaging finding associated with RS. Besides, there was a trend with higher numbers of loosening of the peg, baseplate, and superior screw, as well as periprosthetic humeral fractures in patients with RS, though not reaching significance.

Current Role of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Management of Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) was historically reserved for the elderly, low-demand patient with rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) or as a salvage procedure after failed primary arthroplasty. Surgeon expertise and the advancement of implant design has allowed RSA to now become commonplace not only for RCA but also for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. RSA provides a robust glenoid baseplate fixation, which allows for easier and more reliable bone grafting or augmentation when needed. For patients with severe glenoid bone loss, RSA has been shown to have superior or equivalent patient-reported outcomes and shoulder range of motion when compared with total shoulder arthroplasty.

Reliability of the Walch Classification for Characterization of Primary Glenohumeral Arthritis: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The Walch classification has been widely accepted and further developed as a method to characterize glenohumeral arthritis. However, many studies have reported low and inconsistent measures of the reliability of the Walch classification. The purpose of this study was to review the literature on the reliability of the Walch classification and characterize how imaging modality and classification modifications affect reliability.

METHODS

A systematic review of publications that included reliability of the Walch classification reported through intraobserver and interobserver kappa values was conducted. A search in January 2021 and repeated in July 2023 used the terms ["Imaging" OR "radiography" OR "CT" OR "MRI"] AND ["Walch classification"] AND ["Glenoid arthritis" OR "Shoulder arthritis"]. All clinical studies from database inception to July 2023 that evaluated the Walch or modified Walch classification's intraobserver and/or interobserver reliability were included. Cadaveric studies and studies that involved subjects with previous arthroplasty, shoulder débridement, glenoid reaming, interposition arthroplasty, and latarjet or bankart procedure were excluded. Articles were categorized by imaging modality and classification modification.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles met all inclusion criteria. Three involved the evaluation of plain radiographs, 10 used CT, two used three-dimensional (3D) CT, and four used magnetic resonance imaging. Nine studies involved the original Walch classification system, five involved a simplified version, and four involved the modified Walch. Six studies examined the reliability of raters of varying experience levels with none reporting consistent differences based on experience. Overall intraobserver reliability of the Walch classifications ranged from 0.34 to 0.92, and interobserver reliability ranged from 0.132 to 0.703. No consistent trends were observed in the effect of the imaging modalities or classification modifications on reliability.

DISCUSSION

The reliability of the Walch classification remains inconsistent, despite modification and imaging advances. Consideration of the limitations of the classification system is important when using it for treatment or prognostic purposes.

Surgical management of biconcave glenoids: a scoping review

Biconcave (B2) glenoids, characterized by significant posterior glenoid bone loss and a biconcave wear pattern, are a challenging pathology in shoulder surgery. Significant bone defects present in B2 glenoids increases the risk of complications and rates of failure for operative patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Diagnosing this entity is of pivotal importance, and can be accomplished with imaging and a comprehensive clinical investigation. There are no clear-cut guidelines for management, but options include hemiarthroplasty, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. In recent years, modern techniques such as corrective reaming, bone grafts, and the use of augmented components have improved patient outcomes. Educating prospective patients is essential for reaching a shared management decision, setting appropriate expectations, and optimizing prognostic outcomes.

Preoperative diagnosis and rotator cuff status impact functional internal rotation following reverse shoulder arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate whether functional internal rotation (fIR) following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) differs based on diagnosis of either: primary osteoarthritis (OA) with intact rotator cuff, massive irreparable rotator cuff tear (MICT) or cuff tear arthropathy (CTA).

METHODS

A retrospective review was carried out on RSAs performed by a single surgeon with the same implant over a 5-year period. Minimum 2-year follow-up was available in 235 patients; 139 (59.1%) were female, and the mean patient age was 72 ± 8 years. Additional clinical evaluation included the Subjective Shoulder Value and Constant score. Postoperative internal rotation was categorized as type I: hand to the buttock or hip; type II: hand to the lower lumbar region; or type III: smooth motion to at least the upper lumbar region. Type I was considered "nonfunctional" internal rotation, and type II and III were fIR.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, internal rotation was classified as type I in 60 patients (25.5%), type II in 114 (48.5%), and type III in 62 (26%). Postoperatively, internal rotation was classified as type I in 70 patients (30%), type II in 86 (36%), and type III in 79 (34%). Compared with preoperative status, fIR improved significantly in OA patients (P < .001), with 49 (52.6%) classified as type II or III postoperatively. In CTA patients, there was no significant change (P = .352). In patients with MICTs, there was a significant loss in fIR postoperatively (P = .003), with 25 patients (30.8%) deteriorating to type I after having either type II or III preoperatively, and only 5 patients (6.1%) improving to either type II or III.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo RSA for primary OA have a better chance of postoperative fIR improvement. A decrease in fIR is common after RSA for MICTs.

Mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and mini-humeral tray reverse total shoulder arthroplasty implant comparisons: two-year clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Augmented glenoid baseplate and offset humeral tray reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) implants may decrease the mechanical impingement that creates scapular notching and improve shoulder function. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of three different RTSA glenoid baseplate and offset humeral tray combinations for patient-reported shoulder function, pain and instability, radiographic imaging evidence of glenoid baseplate or humeral stem subsidence and migration, bony changes associated with implant loosening, and scapular notching over the initial 2 years post-RTSA. Primary outcomes included active shoulder mobility, perceived function, pain, instability, scapular notching, and implant survival.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients from 6 research sites received one of three different glenoid baseplate and humeral tray combinations. Group 1 (n = 21) received a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate with a standard humeral tray; Group 2 (n = 23) received a standard glenoid baseplate and a mini-humeral tray with 3 trunnion offset options; Group 3 (n = 23) received both a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and a mini-humeral tray with 3 trunnion offset options. Subjects underwent radiologic evaluation, completed the ASES scale, the EQ-5D-5L quality of life scale, VAS shoulder pain and instability questions, and active shoulder mobility measurements pre-operatively, and 6-weeks, 6-months, 1-2 years post-RTSA.

RESULTS

Improved active shoulder mobility, quality of life, perceived function, decreased shoulder pain and instability, excellent implant survival and minimal scapular notching were observed for all groups. Group 3 had better overall active shoulder mobility than the other groups and better perceived function than Group 1.

CONCLUSION

The group that received the mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and mini-humeral tray combination had better overall active shoulder flexion, external rotation at 90° abduction, and internal rotation. This group also had better perceived shoulder function compared to the group that received a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate with a standard humeral tray.

Glenohumeral osteoarthritis: what the surgeon needs from the radiologist

Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) is a widely prevalent disease with increasing frequency due to population aging. Both clinical manifestations and radiography play key roles in the initial diagnosis, staging, and management decisions. Radiographic disease progression evaluation is performed using validated staging systems, such as Kellgren and Lawrence, Samilson, and Hamada. For young patients with mild to moderate GHOA and failed conservative treatment, arthroscopic preservation surgery (APS) is usually considered. Older patients and those with severe GHOA benefit from different types of arthroplasties. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for APS surgical planning, as it maps repairable labral, cartilage, and rotator cuff lesions. For arthroplasty planning, the status of glenoid cartilage and intactness of rotator cuff as well as glenoid morphology represent key factors guiding the decision regarding the most suitable hardware design, whether resurfacing, partial, total, or reverse joint replacement. Pre-surgical MRI or alternatively computed tomography arthrogram is employed to evaluate the cartilage and rotator cuff. Finally, three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) is indicated to optimally assess the glenoid morphology (to determine Walch classification, version, inclination, and bone loss) and analyze the necessity for glenoid osteotomy or graft augmentation to correct the glenoid structural abnormalities for future success and longevity of the shoulder implants or chosen constructs. Understanding the purpose of each imaging and treatment modality allows more efficient image interpretation. This article reviews the above concepts and details what a surgeon needs from a radiologist and could benefit from accurate reporting of preoperative imaging studies.

The base plate orientation angle: a plain radiographic technique for designing the base plate's inclination in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Background

Superior inclination of the base plate in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is underestimated and may lead to major setbacks in terms of functional outcomes due to the altered biomechanics. Joint instability, scapular notching, and loosening of the glenoid component are considered the most serious sequelae. Therefore, a thorough preoperative radiological assessment of the affected shoulder joint and customized design of the prosthesis according to the glenoid morphology are decisive and directly correlated to the outcome. In this article, we propose a simple radiographic technique to assess the inclination of the glenoid preoperatively, which identifies the need for intraoperative correction.

Materials and Methods

One hundred inconspicuous shoulder radiographs were included in the control group (CG) to define the normal ranges of the base plate orientation angle (BOA) and the base plate correction angle (BCA). Further, both angles were measured on 2-dimensional (2D) computed tomography scans of patients with proximal humerus fractures as well as radiographs, 2D and 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography scans of patients with cuff tear arthropathy who underwent RSA between 2018 and 2021. The interobserver reliability among three independent testers was evaluated by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient. In cuff tear arthropathy cases, the BOA and BCA measurements on different imaging modalities were compared using the Wilcoxon test. Possible variations of both angles' values based on glenoid erosion types, according to the Favard classification, were also investigated.

Results

Regardless of the imaging modality used, the interobserver reliability was excellent among three independent observers. In the CG, the mean BOA and BCA values were 118° ± 6° and 17° ± 5°, respectively. The mean corrected BOA values of the CG and fracture group were 136° ± 5° and 140° ± 5°, respectively. In contrast to the BCA values, the BOA measurements on radiographs showed a statistically significant difference compared to those obtained on 2D- and 3D scans in the cuff arthropathy group. Further, both angles' values varied according to the extent and location of the glenoid erosion. The lowest mean BOA and highest mean BCA values were observed in cases with Favard glenoid type E3.

Conclusions

The BOA and the BCA are reliable tools proposed to aid in precisely positioning the glenoid component in RSA in the preoperative setting. Whereas, the BOA determines the inclination of the inferior glenoid segment, the BCA represents the extent of correction required to obtain a neutral inclination of the base plate. Glenoid type E3 of the Favard classification with superior wear is particularly susceptible to base plate superior tilt.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: State-of-the-art

The reverse shoulder arthroplasty conceived by Paul Grammont in 1985 has gradually gained popularity as a treatment for multiple shoulder diseases. Unlike previous reverse shoulder prosthesis characterized by unsatisfactory results and a high glenoid implant failure rate, the Grammont design has immediately shown good clinical outcomes. This semi constrained prosthesis solved the issues of the very first designs by medializing and distalizing the center of rotation with an increased stability of the replacement of the component. The indication was initially limited to cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). It has then been expanded to irreparable massive cuff tears and displaced humeral head fractures. The most frequent problems of this design are a limited postoperative external rotation and scapular notching. Different modifications to the original Grammont design have been proposed with the aim of decreasing the risk of failure and complications and improving the clinical outcomes. Both the position and version/inclination of the glenosphere and the humeral configuration (e.g. neck shaft angle) influence the RSA outcomes. A lateralized glenoid (whether with bone or metal) and a 135° Inlay system configuration leads to a moment arm which is the closest to the native shoulder. Clinical research will focus on implant designs reducing bone adaptations and revision rate, strategies to prevent more effectively infections. Furthermore, there is still room for improvement in terms of better postoperative internal and external rotations and clinical outcomes after RSA implanted for humeral fracture and revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Survivorship of shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis: an analysis of the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

BACKGROUND

The treatment of shoulder osteoarthritis in the young patient remains challenging. The higher functional demands and higher expectations of the young patient cohort are often coupled with increased failure and revision rates. Consequently, shoulder surgeons are faced with a unique challenge with implant selection. The aim of this study was to compare the survivorship and reasons for revision of 5 classes of shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged <55 years with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis by use of data from a large national arthroplasty registry.

METHODS

The study population included all primary shoulder arthroplasty procedures undertaken for osteoarthritis in patients aged <55 years and reported to the registry between September 1999 and December 2021. Procedures were grouped into the following classes: total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), hemiarthroplasty resurfacing (HRA), hemiarthroplasty stemmed metallic head (HSMH), hemiarthroplasty stemmed pyrocarbon head (HSPH), and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). The outcome measure was the cumulative percent revision, which was defined using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship to describe the time to the first revision. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age and sex, to compare revision rates among groups.

RESULTS

There were 1564 shoulder arthroplasty procedures in patients aged <55 years, of which 361 (23.1%) were HRA, 70 (4.5%) were HSMH, 159 (10.2%) were HSPH, 714 (45.7%) were TSA, and 260 (16.6%) were RTSA. HRA had a higher rate of revision than RTSA after 1 year (HRA = 2.51 (95% CI 1.30, 4.83), P = .005), with no difference prior to that time. In addition, HSMH had a higher rate of revision than RTSA for the entire period (HR, 2.69 [95% confidence interval, 1.28-5.63], P = .008). There was no significant difference in the rate of revision for HSPH and TSA when they were compared with RTSA. Glenoid erosion was the most common cause of revision for HRA (28.6% of revisions) and HSMH (50%). Instability/dislocation was the leading cause of revision for RTSA (41.7%) and HSPH (28.6%), and for TSA, the majority of revisions were for either instability/dislocation (20.6%) or loosening (18.6%).

CONCLUSION

These results should be interpreted within the context of the lack of availability of long-term data on RTSA and HSPH stems. RTSA outperforms all implants regarding revision rates at mid-term follow-up. The high early dislocation rate associated with RTSA, as well as the lack of revision options available to address this, indicates that careful selection of patients and a greater appreciation of anatomic risk factors are needed in the future.

Management of glenoid bone loss with impaction and structural bone grafting in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Glenoid bone loss is a commonly encountered problem in complex primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty. Addressing glenoid bone loss is critical to avoid complications like early loosening, impingement, notching and instability. A large number of techniques like bone grafting using autograft or allograft, eccentric reaming, augmented base plates, patient-specific instrumentations and custom-made implants are available to tackle bone loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively collected the data of all patients with glenoid defects undergoing primary or revision reverse shoulder replacement between 2004 and 2017. This included demographic data, ranges of motion, Constant-Murley score and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). A pre-operative CT scan was done as well to plan the surgery and calculate the glenoid version. At each follow-up, the clinical function and shoulder scores were assessed. Additionally, the radiographs were assessed for graft incorporation, evidence of lysis and calculation of glenoid version.

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2017, 37 patients underwent glenoid bone grafting during reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Average age was 72 years (range 46-88). Indications for surgery were cuff tear arthropathy (6 patients); revision of failed other prosthesis (23); primary osteoarthritis (4); rheumatoid arthritis (3); and second-stage revision for infection (1). The glenoid defect was contained in 24 patients, and therefore, impaction graft with a combination of bone graft substitute and/or humeral head autograft was performed. In 13 patients the glenoid defect was severe and uncontainable and therefore a graft-implant composite glenoid was implanted using humeral head autograft or allograft. Average follow-up was 3.6 years (range 1-10). Mean Constant score improved from 34 before surgery to 63 after surgery. Mean SSV score improved from 0.9/10 to 8.3/10. Active movements improved significantly with forward elevation increasing from 54° to 123°; abduction from 48° to 123°; external rotation from 24° to 38°; internal rotation from 57° to 70°. Radiographs at final follow-up showed no radiolucencies around the glenoid component and no evidence of loosening of the implant. In 2 cases there was a grade I notching. There was 100% survivorship at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Impaction bone grafting along with structural grafting when required is an effective and reproducible way of managing severe glenoid bone loss. This technique gives consistent and good clinical and radiological results.

Patient Specific Instruments and Patient Individual Implants—A Narrative Review

Joint arthroplasties are one of the most frequently performed standard operations worldwide. Patient individual instruments and patient individual implants represent an innovation that must prove its usefulness in further studies. However, promising results are emerging. Those implants seem to be a benefit especially in revision situations. Most experience is available in the field of knee and hip arthroplasty. Patient-specific instruments for the shoulder and upper ankle are much less common. Patient individual implants combine individual cutting blocks and implants, while patient individual instruments solely use individual cutting blocks in combination with off-the-shelf implants. This review summarizes the current data regarding the implantation of individual implants and the use of individual instruments.

Complications and revisions in anatomic and reverse short stem shoulder arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

One current trend in the field of shoulder arthroplasty is a design shift to shorter and metaphyseal fixed humeral stem components. The aim of this investigation is to analyze complications resulting in revision surgery after anatomic (ASA) and reverse (RSA) short stem arthroplasty. We hypothesize that complications are influenced by the type of prosthesis and indication for arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 279 short stem shoulder prostheses were implanted by the same surgeon (162 ASA; 117 RSA), and 223 of these prostheses were implanted as primary procedures; in 54 cases, arthroplasty was performed secondary to prior open surgery. Main indications were osteoarthritis (OA) (n = 134), cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) (n = 74) and posttraumatic deformities (PTr) (n = 59). Patients were evaluated at 6 weeks (follow-up 1; FU1), 2 years (FU2) and the time span of the last follow-up defined as FU3 with a minimum FU of 2 years. Complications were categorized into early complications (within FU1), intermediate complications (within FU2) and late complications (> 2 years; FU3).

RESULTS

In total, 268 prostheses (96.1%) were available for FU1; 267 prostheses (95.7%) were available for FU2 and 218 prostheses (77.8%) were available for FU3. The average time for FU3 was 53.0 months (range 24-95). A complication leading to revision occurred in 21 prostheses (7.8%), 6 (3.7%) in the ASA group and 15 (12.7%) in the RSA group (p < 0.005). The most frequent cause for revision was infection (n = 9; 42.9%). After primary implantation, 3 complications (2.2%) occurred in the ASA and 10 complications (11.0%) in the RSA group (p < 0.005). The complication rate was 2.2% in patients with OA, 13.5% in CTA and 11.9% in PTr.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty had a significantly higher rate of complications and revisions than primary and secondary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty, respectively. Therefore, indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty should be critically questioned in each individual case.

Encouraging outcomes of stemless ceramic head anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in severe primary osteoarthritis (Walch type B glenoids)

Background: We report the radiological and functional outcomes at five years in patients with severe osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint and a Walch type B glenoid who have undergone stemless anatomic total shoulder replacement. Methods: A retrospective analysis of case notes, computed tomography scans and plain radiographs of patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder replacement for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis were performed. Patients were grouped by the severity of their osteoarthritis using the modified Walch classification, glenoid retroversion and posterior humeral head subluxation. An evaluation was made using modern planning software. Functional outcomes were assessed using the American shoulder and elbow surgeons score, shoulder pain and disability index and visual analogue scale. Annual Lazarus scores were reviewed as regard to glenoid loosening. Results: Thirty patients were reviewed at 5 years. Analysis of all patient-reported outcome measures demonstrated significant improvement at 5-year review, American shoulder and elbow surgeons (p = <0.0001), shoulder pain and disability index (p = 0.0001), visual analogue scale (p = 0.0001). Radiological associations between Walch scores and Lazarus scores were not statistically significant (p = 0.1251) at 5 years. There were no associations between features of glenohumeral osteoarthritis and patient-reported outcome measures. Discussion: The severity of osteoarthritis did not show any association with glenoid component survivorship or with patient-reported outcome measures at 5 years review. Level of evidence: IV.

Management of glenoid bone loss in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Aims

Rates of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) continue to grow. Glenoid bone loss and deformity remains a technical challenge to the surgeon and may reduce improvements in patients’ outcomes. However, there is no consensus as to the optimal surgical technique to best reconstruct these patients’ anatomy. This review aims to compare the outcomes of glenoid bone grafting versus augmented glenoid prostheses in the management of glenoid bone loss in primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated study-level data in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. We performed searches of Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and PubMed from their dates of inception to January 2022. From included studies, we analyzed data for preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM), patient-reported functional outcomes, and complication rates.

Results

A total of 13 studies (919 shoulders) were included in the analysis. The mean age of patients at initial evaluation was 72.2 years (42 to 87), with a mean follow-up time of 40.7 months (24 to 120). Nine studies with 292 rTSAs evaluated the use of bone graft and five studies with 627 rTSAs evaluated the use of augmented glenoid baseplates. One study was analyzed in both groups. Both techniques demonstrated improvement in patient-reported outcome measures and ROM assessment, with augmented prostheses outperforming bone grafting on improvements in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score. There was a higher complication rate (8.9% vs 3.5%; p < 0.001) and revision rate among the bone grafting group compared with the patients who were treated with augmented prostheses (2.4% vs 0.6%; p = 0.022).

Conclusion

This review provides strong evidence that both bone graft and augmented glenoid baseplate techniques to address glenoid bone loss give excellent ROM and functional outcomes in primary rTSA. The use of augmented base plates may confer fewer complications and revisions. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(12):1334–1342.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with type B2, B3, and type C glenoids: comparable clinical outcome to patients without compromised glenoid bone stock-a matched pair analysis

BACKGROUND

Primarily posterior bone deficient (dysplastic) (Walch type C) or secondarily eroded (Walch type B2 or B3) glenoids represent a surgical challenge for shoulder arthroplasty. Due to the posteriorly static decentered head, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is often considered as the treatment of choice. The purpose of this study is to report the clinical and radiographic outcomes, complications and reoperations of RTSA for posteriorly deficient glenoids.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent RTSA for osteoarthritis secondary to underlying glenoid deficiency (Walch type B2, B3 and C) between 2005 and 2018 (study group), were identified from our institutional shoulder arthroplasty database and gender- and age-matched to a cohort of patients with normal glenoid bone stock (control group). Longitudinal pre- and postoperative clinical [Constant-Murley (CS) score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV)] and radiographic outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

We included 188 patients (94 in each group). The median follow-up was 43 ± 26 (24-144) months in the study group and 59 ± 32 (24-124) months in the control group. The glenoid deficiency was addressed by using glenoid bone reconstruction. The surgical site complication and revision rate of RTSA in patients with bony deficient glenoids were 17% and 7%. Although glenoid loosening was slightly higher in the study group (5 vs. 2), overall no significant differences were found between the study and control groups in satisfaction scores, preoperative and postoperative absolute and relative Constant scores, complication and revision rates, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) seems to be a valuable treatment option for patients with primary (dysplasia) or secondary (wear) posterior glenoid deficiency. Although severe glenoid bone loss seems to be a risk factor for glenoid component failure, the overall complication and revision rates as well as clinical and radiographic outcome are comparable to RTSA in patients without compromised glenoid bone stock.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III: case-control study.

No Strength Differences Despite Greater Posterior Rotator Cuff Intramuscular Fat in Patients With Eccentric Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

When nonoperative measures do not alleviate the symptoms of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), patients with advanced OA primarily are treated with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). It is unknown why TSAs performed in patients with eccentric (asymmetric glenoid wear) compared with concentric (symmetric glenoid wear) deformities exhibit higher failure rates, despite surgical advances. Persistent disruption of the posterior-to-anterior rotator cuff (RC) force couple resulting from posterior RC intramuscular degeneration in patients with eccentric deformities could impair external rotation strength and may contribute to eventual TSA failure. Pain and intramuscular fat within the RC muscles may impact external rotation strength measures and are important to consider.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is there relative shoulder external rotation weakness in patients with eccentric compared with concentric deformities? (2) Is there higher resting or torque-dependent pain in patients with eccentric compared with concentric deformities? (3) Do patients with eccentric deformities have higher posterior-to-anterior RC intramuscular fat percent ratios than patients with concentric deformities?

METHODS

From February 2020 to November 2021, 65% (52 of 80) of patients with OA met study eligibility criteria. Of these, 63% (33 of 52) of patients enrolled and provided informed consent. From a convenience sample of 21 older adults with no history of shoulder pain, 20 met eligibility criteria as control participants. Of the convenience sample, 18 patients enrolled and provided informed consent. In total for this prospective, cross-sectional study, across patients with OA and control participants, 50% (51 of 101) of participants were enrolled and allocated into the eccentric (n = 16), concentric (n = 17), and control groups (n = 18). A 3-degree-of-freedom load cell was used to sensitively quantify strength in all three dimensions surrounding the shoulder. Participants performed maximal isometric contractions in 26 1-, 2-, and 3-degree-of-freedom direction combinations involving adduction/abduction, internal/external rotation, and/or flexion/extension. To test for relative external rotation weakness, we quantified relative strength in opposing directions (three-dimensional [3D] strength balance) along the X (+adduction/-abduction), Y (+internal/-external rotation), and Z (+flexion/-extension) axes and compared across the three groups. Patients with OA rated their shoulder pain (numerical rating 0-10) before testing at rest (resting pain; response to "How bad is your pain today?") and with each maximal contraction (torque-dependent pain; numerical rating 0-10). Resting and torque-dependent pain were compared between patients with eccentric and concentric deformities to determine if pain was higher in the eccentric group. The RC cross-sectional areas and intramuscular fat percentages were quantified on Dixon-sequence MRIs by a single observer who performed manual segmentation using previously validated methods. Ratios of posterior-to-anterior RC fat percent (infraspinatus + teres minor fat percent/subscapularis fat percent) were computed and compared between the OA groups.

RESULTS

There was no relative external rotation weakness in patients with eccentric deformities (Y component of 3D strength balance, mean ± SD: -4.7% ± 5.1%) compared with patients with concentric deformities (-0.05% ± 4.5%, mean difference -4.7% [95% CI -7.5% to -1.9%]; p = 0.05). However, there was more variability in 3D strength balance in the eccentric group (95% CI volume, % 3 : 893) compared with the concentric group (95% CI volume, % 3 : 579). In patients with eccentric compared with concentric deformities, there was no difference in median (IQR) resting pain (1.0 [3.0] versus 2.0 [2.3], mean rank difference 4.5 [95% CI -6.6 to 16]; p = 0.61) or torque-dependent pain (0.70 [3.0] versus 0.58 [1.5], mean rank difference 2.6 [95% CI -8.8 to 14]; p = 0.86). In the subset of 18 of 33 patients with OA who underwent MRI, seven patients with eccentric deformities demonstrated a higher posterior-to-anterior RC fat percent ratio than the 11 patients with concentric deformities (1.2 [0.8] versus 0.70 [0.3], mean rank difference 6.4 [95% CI 1.4 to 11.5]; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Patients with eccentric deformities demonstrated higher variability in strength compared with patients with concentric deformities. This increased variability suggests patients with potential subtypes of eccentric wear patterns (posterior-superior, posterior-central, and posterior-inferior) may compensate differently for underlying anatomic changes by adopting unique kinematic or muscle activation patterns.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our findings highlight the importance of careful clinical evaluation of patients presenting with eccentric deformities because some may exhibit potentially detrimental strength deficits. Recognition of such strength deficits may allow for targeted rehabilitation. Future work should explore the relationship between strength in patients with specific subtypes of eccentric wear patterns and potential forms of kinematic or muscular compensation to determine whether these factors play a role in TSA failures in patients with eccentric deformities.

Baseplate retroversion does not affect postoperative outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is concern that excessive glenoid component retroversion leads to altered biomechanics and baseplate failure in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). However, much of this has been rooted in the total shoulder arthroplasty experience. In the current literature, it is not well defined whether glenoid baseplate positioning in reverse arthroplasty affects functional outcomes. Our practice has been to preserve glenoid bone stock without aiming for a certain degree of retroversion. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between pre- and postoperative retroversion in a cohort of RSAs and determine the effect of glenoid retroversion on functional outcomes, range of motion, and postoperative complications.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who had an RSA between 2017 and 2019 was performed. Preoperative computed tomography scans were used to assess preoperative retroversion, and axillary radiographs were used for postoperative retroversion. Outcome measures included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, visual analog scale for pain score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, range of motion, radiographic lucency, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 271 patients were eligible for the study. There was a 76.9% 2-year follow-up rate. In total 161 patients had postoperative retroversion ≤15° (group A), and 110 patients had retroversion >15° (group B). There were no significant differences in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, visual analog scale, or Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores. There were also no significant differences in postoperative range of motion. There was 1 baseplate failure in each group, and there was 1 patient in group B with asymptomatic radiographic loosening (baseplate at risk). The mean change in pre- to postoperative retroversion was 1° and 4° in groups A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in postoperative functional outcomes, range of motion, or complications between patients who had baseplate retroversion ≤15° vs. those who had retroversion >15°.

Standard radiological classification of glenohumeral osteoarthritis does not correlate with the complexity of the arthritic glenoid deformity

BACKGROUND

The Samilson-Prieto classification (SPC) depending on the humeral osteophyte length on a-pX-rays today is widely used to classify glenohumeral osteoarthritis in general. For treatment planning and prognosis, the patho-morphology of the glenoid and static posterior subluxation of the humeral head classified according to Walch is of much higher importance. Here, usually a CT or MRI scan is required for a correct classification. A possible correlation between both classifications is poorly explored. Without it, the complexity of the case might be mis-interpreted using the SPC. The aim of this study was to investigate such a correlation, i.e. whether it correlates with the glenoid deformity and degree of humeral head subluxation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Radiological datasets (X-ray and CT or MRI) of 352 patients with primary OA of the shoulder were evaluated by two observers experienced in shoulder surgery. For the Samilson-Prieto classification, true a-p shoulder radiographs and for the modified Walch classification CT or MRI scans in the axial plane were interpreted using a validated method. To investigate a correlation between both classifications, the Fisher's exact test was used. For the interobserver reliability, the weighted kappa coefficient κ was determined.

RESULTS

For the Walch classification, both observers found a similar percentage for the different types, with decreasing numbers from normal (type A1) to severely altered glenoids In the Samilson-Prieto classification, OA grade I was predominant, while grade II and III showed a relatively equal distribution. Interobserver reliability was high both for the Walch classification with a κ 0.923 (95% confidence interval 0.892; 0.954) and) for the SPC with a κ 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.843; 0.916). A correlation between the two classifications in Fischer's exact test could not be shown (p = 0.584).

DISCUSSION

Since there is no correlation between both, using the Samilson-Prieto classification alone might miss relevant prognostic factors in gleno-humeral OA. Adequate imaging of the glenoid morphology also in the axial plane is absolutely mandatory to understand the complexity and chose the right treatment for each patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Study of Diagnostic Test-Level II.

Glenoid retroversion does not impact clinical outcomes or implant survivorship after total shoulder arthroplasty with minimal, noncorrective reaming

Hypothesis

Both clinical outcomes and early rates of failure will not be associated with glenoid retroversion.

Methods

All patients who underwent an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with minimal, noncorrective reaming between 2006 and 2016 with minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed. Measurements for retroversion, inclination, and posterior subluxation were obtained from magnetic resonance imaging or computerized tomography. A regression analysis was performed to assess the association between retroversion, inclination and subluxation, and their effect on patient reported outcomes (PROs). Clinical failures and complications were reported.

Results

One hundred fifty-one anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (90% follow-up) with a mean follow-up of 4.6 years (range, 2-12 years) were assessed. The mean preoperative retroversion was 15.6° (range, 0.2-42.1), the mean posterior subluxation was 15.1% (range, -3.6 to 44.1%), and the mean glenoid inclination was 13.9° (range, -11.3 to 44.3). All median outcome scores improved significantly from pre- to post-operatively (P < .001). The median satisfaction was 10/10 (1st quartile = 7 and 3rd quartile = 10). Linear regression analysis found no significant association between retroversion and any postoperative PRO. A total of 5 (3.3%) failures occurred due to glenoid implant loosening (3 patients) and Cutibacterium acnes infection (2 patients) with no association between failure causation and increased retroversion or inclination. No correlation could be found between the Walch classification and postoperative PROs.

Conclusion

Anatomic total shoulder replacement with minimal and noncorrective glenoid reaming demonstrates reliable increases in patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes at a mean of 4.6-year follow-up in patients with up to 40° of native retroversion. Higher values of retroversion were not associated with early deterioration of clinical outcomes, revisions, or failures. Long-term studies are needed to see if survivorship and outcomes hold up over time.

Shoulder structure and function: The impact of osteoarthritis and rehabilitation strategies

STUDY DESIGN

Invited review.

BACKGROUND

Shoulder osteoarthritis can result in significant functional deficits. To improve diagnosis and treatment, we must better understand the impact of osteoarthritis on shoulder biomechanics and the known mechanical benefits of currently available treatments.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to present up-to-date data on the effects of osteoarthritis and rehabilitation on the biomechanical parameters contributing to shoulder function. With this goal, we also reviewed the anatomy and the ranges of motion of the shoulder.

METHODS

A search of electronic databases was conducted. All study designs were included to inform this qualitative, narrative literature review.

RESULTS

This review describes the biomechanics of the shoulder, the impact of osteoarthritis on shoulder function, and the treatment of shoulder osteoarthritis with an emphasis on rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

The shoulder is important for the completion of activities of daily living, and osteoarthritis of the shoulder can significantly reduce shoulder motion and arm function. Although shoulder rehabilitation is an integral treatment modality to improve pain and function in shoulder osteoarthritis, few high-quality studies have investigated the effects and benefits of shoulder physical and occupational therapies. To advance the fields of therapy and rehabilitation, future studies investigating the effects of therapy intensity, therapy duration, and the relative benefits of therapy subtypes on shoulder biomechanics and function are necessary.

Relationship between postoperative integrity of subscapularis tendon and functional outcome in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND

The role of the subscapularis in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) remains controversial. Studies have shown that subscapularis repair has no significant influence on the functional outcomes of patients. However, few studies have assessed the postoperative integrity of the subscapularis tendon after RSA. The aims of this study were to investigate the postoperative healing of the subscapularis after RSA via ultrasound and to evaluate the relationship between tendon integrity and functional outcomes. We hypothesized that subjects with a healed subscapularis after RSA would have higher Constant scores and better internal rotation (IR) than those without a healed subscapularis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent primary RSA with subscapularis tenotomy repair performed by a single surgeon with a minimum 2-year follow-up period. The inclusion criteria were (1) primary RSA and (2) complete intraoperative repair of the subscapularis tenotomy if the tendon was amenable to repair. The total Constant score and active and passive range of motion were measured preoperatively and at every postoperative visit. IR was further subcategorized into 3 functional types (type I, buttock or sacrum; type II, lumbar region; and type III, T12 or higher). The integrity of the subscapularis on ultrasound at 2 years was reported using the Sugaya classification. The correlation between subscapularis integrity and functional outcomes including functional IR was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients (mean age, 73 ± 7.4 years; age range, 50-89 years) were evaluated. The mean postoperative Constant score for all patients significantly improved from 38 points to 72 points (P < .001) at last follow-up (mean, 3.3 years). There was significant improvement in all Constant score functional subscales and in terms of range of motion. The rate of sonographic healing of the subscapularis was 52.6%. There was no difference in Constant scores between "intact" and "failed" tendon repairs; however, intact tendons demonstrated significantly better IR with no difference in external rotation (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

The healing rate of the subscapularis following RSA was only 52.6%. IR function in patients with an intact subscapularis at 2 years after RSA was significantly better than in patients with failed or absent tendon repairs. Primary repair of reparable subscapularis tendons during RSA should be strongly considered.

Anatomic vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of Walch B2 glenoid morphology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Walch B2 glenoid morphology with glenohumeral osteoarthritis is a difficult degenerative pattern to manage for shoulder surgeons. Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in combination with eccentric reaming or bone grafting are the traditional methods of treatment. Newer approaches such as TSA with posteriorly augmented glenoid components and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) may offer better stability for the posteriorly subluxated biconcave B2 wear pattern. The aim of this systematic review is to compare mid-term surgical and functional outcomes of Walch B2 glenoids without significant rotator cuff pathology treated with TSA and RSA.

Methods

The review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines by searching the MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase (Elsevier) databases. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies that evaluated the outcomes and complications of TSA or RSA in the setting of B2 glenoid morphology without significant rotator cuff pathology. Data relevant to TSA and RSA surgical outcomes were extracted and compiled, and outcomes were compared. A meta-analysis of proportions of complication and revision rates among TSA and RSA groups was performed.

Results

Overall, 16 articles were included with 414 TSAs and 78 RSAs. The average follow-up duration was 54.1 ± 14.8 months for patients undergoing TSA and 44.8 ± 10.1 months for patients undergoing RSA. The TSA group was further subdivided based on the use of eccentric reaming (135 TSAs), an augmented glenoid component (84 TSAs), or bone grafting (11 TSAs) or was unspecified (184 TSAs). Overall, patients undergoing TSA and RSA demonstrated mean improvements of 50.1 ± 8.5° and 64.7 ± 5.2° in active flexion, 58.5 ± 10.3° and 68.9 ± not reported° in active abduction, and 31.3 ± 5.7° and 29.0 ± 10.2° in active external rotation, respectively. In regard to functional outcome scores, patients undergoing TSA and RSA showed mean Constant score improvements of 38.8 ± 5.3 and 46.6 ± 3.1 points and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improvements of 48.2 ± 1.0 and 49.2 ± 25.3 points, respectively. Results of the meta-analysis with mid-term follow-up data demonstrated pooled complication rates of 9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1%-22%) for TSA and 6% (95% CI, 0%-28%) for RSA and pooled revision rates of 2% (95% CI, 0%-8%) for TSA and 1% (95% CI, 0%-15%) for RSA.

Conclusion

In the setting of Walch B2 glenoid morphology, TSA with eccentric reaming or an augmented component yields comparable outcomes to RSA. Based on the patient's age, activity level, and expectations, both TSA and RSA can be considered a reasonable option to treat Walch B2 glenoid morphology.

Clinical outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for primary shoulder osteoarthritis did not differ between elderly and younger Japanese patients

Background

Few studies on the outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) in Asian populations have been reported. In addition, approximately one-third of primary aTSA were performed for patients 80 years or older in Japan, but the indication of aTSA for the primary shoulder osteoarthritis in the elderly population remained unclear. The purposes of this study were (1) to investigate clinical outcomes of aTSA in Japanese patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis and (2) to compare clinical outcomes between patients 80 years or older and 70 years or younger. We hypothesized that aTSA would yield favorable outcomes in Japanese patients and that the outcomes of aTSA in patients 80 years or older would be comparable to those 70 years or younger.

Methods

Patient records were retrospectively reviewed to collect patients who underwent aTSA for glenohumeral osteoarthritis between August 2011 and September 2017. The inclusion criterion of this study was aTSA performed for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) secondary osteoarthritis, (2) revision surgery, and (3) < 24-month follow-up. Range of motion (ROM) and Constant score were evaluated, and complications were investigated. Rotator cuff integrity was assessed by ultrasonography. We compared the outcomes between patients 80 years or older and 70 years or younger.

Results

Seventy-seven shoulders (72 patients) met the study criteria. There were 14 men and 58 women with a mean age of 75 years (range, 57-93 years) at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up was 40 months (range, 24-84 months). The Constant score significantly improved from preoperative 54 (range, 35-78) to postoperative 89 (range 69-100, P = .03). Range of motion also showed significant improvement after surgery: flexion, 90° (range, 60°-130°) to 140° (range, 90°-170°); external rotation at the side, from 7° (range, -10 to 60°) to 40° (range, 5°-70°); internal rotation, from buttock (range, buttock-L3) to L2 level (range, buttock-T8) (P <.001 for all). Postoperative subscapularis tendon tears were detected in 3 shoulders (5%). Complications other than rotator cuff tears were observed in 5 shoulders (6%). Postoperative Constant score and ROM significantly improved in both elderly and younger patients without significant differences.

Conclusion

The clinical outcomes after aTSA in the Japanese population demonstrated significant improvements in ROM and Constant score with a low complication rate in the mid-term follow-up. aTSA should be indicated even in elderly patients because they also demonstrated comparable outcomes to younger patients.

Stepped Augmented Glenoid Component in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for B2 and B3 Glenoid Pathology: A Study of Early Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Posterior glenoid bone loss is commonly associated with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Surgical management of bone loss in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) remains controversial. We studied the use of a stepped augmented glenoid component for management of Walch B2 and B3 glenoids and compared the radiographic and clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up with those achieved with a non-augmented component of the same design in Walch A1 glenoids.

METHODS

Ninety-two patients (42 A1, 29 B2, and 21 B3 glenoids) were prospectively followed after aTSA. Sequential 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) imaging was performed preoperatively, within 3 months postoperatively with metal artifact reduction (MAR) to define implant position, and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively with MAR. Scapular 3D registration with implant registration allowed 3D measurement of glenoid implant position, implant shift, and central peg osteolysis (CPO).

RESULTS

CPO with or without implant shift occurred in a higher percentage of B3 glenoids treated with the augmented glenoid component (29%) than A1 glenoids treated with a standard component (5%) (p = 0.028). There was no significant difference in the frequency of CPO between B2 glenoids with the augmented component (10%) and A1 glenoids with the standard component. There was no difference in postoperative glenoid component version and inclination between groups. B3 glenoids were associated with more component medialization relative to the premorbid joint line compared with A1 and B2 glenoids (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A stepped augmented glenoid component can restore premorbid glenoid anatomy in patients with asymmetric biconcave glenoid bone loss (Walch B2), with short-term clinical and radiographic results equivalent to those for patients without glenoid bone loss (Walch A1) treated with a non-augmented component. There is a greater risk of CPO in patients with moderate-to-severe B3 glenoid pathology with this stepped augmented glenoid component. Longer follow-up will help define the clinical implications of CPO over time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Subluxation in the Arthritic Shoulder

»

The term "subluxation" means partial separation of the joint surfaces. In the arthritic shoulder, "arthritic glenohumeral subluxation" refers to displacement of the humeral head on the surface of the glenoid.

»

The degree of arthritic glenohumeral subluxation can be measured using radiography with standardized axillary views or computed tomography (CT).

»

Shoulders with a type-B1 or B2 glenoid may show more posterior subluxation on an axillary radiograph that is made with the arm in an elevated position than on a CT scan that is made with the arm at the side.

»

The degree of arthritic glenohumeral subluxation is not closely related to glenoid retroversion.

»

The position of the humeral head with respect to the plane of the scapula is related to glenoid retroversion and is not a measure of glenohumeral subluxation.

»

Studies measuring glenohumeral subluxation before and after arthroplasty should clarify its importance to the clinical outcomes of shoulder reconstruction.

Trends and impact of three-dimensional preoperative imaging for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The goals of this study were to determine the incidence in the United States of preoperative three-dimensional imaging prior to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and to determine if preoperative imaging is associated with decreased complication rates.

METHODS

Using a Medicare insurance database, we identified all patients who underwent computed tomography (n = 9380) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (n = 15,653) prior to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for a diagnosis of osteoarthritis from 2005 to 2014. The incidence of imaging over time was analyzed and complication rates compared between patients with imaging to matched controls.

RESULTS

The incidence of preoperative three-dimensional imaging significantly increased over time, with computed tomography increasing more than magnetic resonance imaging. Compared to controls, patients with preoperative computed tomography imaging had significantly lower revision rates at two years (odds ratio 0.72 (0.64-0.82), p = 0.008). There were no other significant differences in the other complications studied.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of preoperative three-dimensional imaging for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for a diagnosis of osteoarthritis has increased dramatically, with the use of computed tomography increasing the most. Patients who underwent preoperative computed tomography imaging experienced lower revision rates at two years postoperatively compared to matched controls without such imaging.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With a Nonspherical Humeral Head and Inlay Glenoid in Elite Weight Lifters: A Prospective Case Series

Background:

Weight lifting after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) can place significant stresses on implants that could lead to instability, loosening, and increased wear. A TSA system with nonspherical humeral head resurfacing and inlay glenoid—which improves the biomechanics and thus reduces instability, wear, and potential loosening—may be able to tolerate repetitive loads from weight lifting.

Purpose:

To determine clinical and radiographic outcomes after TSA in weight lifters.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

We prospectively enrolled 16 weight lifters (mean ± SD age, 57.2 ± 7.8 years; 15 male) undergoing primary anatomic TSA (n = 17 shoulders, 1 staged bilateral) with nonspherical humeral head resurfacing and inlay glenoid replacement for glenohumeral osteoarthritis between February 2015 and February 2019. Exclusion criteria were rotator cuff deficiency, revision TSA, post-traumatic arthritis, and inflammatory arthritis. Outcome measures included the rate of return to weight lifting, results of patient-reported outcome measures (Penn Shoulder Score, Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, and 12-Item Veterans RAND Health Survey), radiographic outcomes, and complication rate.

Results:

Follow-up was obtained on all patients at a mean of 38 months (range, 14-63 months). All patients returned to competitive weight lifting at 15.6 ± 6.9 weeks. Compared to the preoperative weight lifting level, at last follow-up patients reported performance at the following level: lighter weight, 1 (6%); same weight, 8 (50%); heavier weight, 7 (44%). Preoperative eccentric posterior glenoid wear was common (71% Walch B2 classification; 12/17), but posterior humeral subluxation improved at follow-up according to the Walch index (mean, 55.5% preoperative vs 48.5% postoperative; P < .001) and contact point ratio (mean, 63.9% preoperative vs 50.1% postoperative; P < .001). Pre- to postoperative improvements were seen in Penn Shoulder Score (44.3 vs 82.6; P < .001), Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (50.6 vs 91.1; P < .001), and 12-Item Veterans RAND Health Survey physical component score but not mental component score. No signs of radiographic loosening were detected in follow-up images, nor were there any postoperative instability episodes or revision surgeries.

Conclusion:

There were substantial improvements in shoulder function and a high rate of return to weight lifting after TSA with a nonspherical humeral head resurfacing and inlay glenoid component. Radiographically, the humeral head centralized on the glenoid after surgery, and there was no evidence of component loosening at a mean 38-month follow-up.

How to Measure Glenoid Bone Stock and Version and Why It Is Important: A Practical Guide

Shoulder osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and debilitating condition and a source of high morbidity and medical expenditures across the world among individuals older than 60 years. Shoulder OA results in the gradual destruction of articular cartilage of the humeral head and glenoid component, causing inflammation, pain, and a restricted range of motion. Most patients are diagnosed with shoulder OA after experiencing shoulder pain and stiffness, and the diagnosis is often made after medical and physical histories are obtained and physical and imaging examinations are performed. Use of various surgical techniques such as total anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty has increased in recent years, resulting in reduced morbidity and improved functional status of patients. However, the rate of surgical complications such as premature loosening of components is significant, reducing the effectiveness of such procedures. Data in the literature indicate that high-grade fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscle before surgery is associated with postoperative glenoid component loosening. High-grade rotator cuff fatty infiltration and atrophy have been found to be associated with more severe Walch classification-based glenoid morphology subtypes, increased joint line medialization, glenoid bone loss, and increased pathologic glenoid version. The authors describe how advanced imaging techniques are used for preoperative evaluation of the shoulder and discuss how to measure glenoid version and bone stock and classify glenoid morphology types on the basis of Walch classification, as these parameters are commonly used in surgical planning. Methods involving the use of Friedman and paleoglenoid lines for respective measurements are illustrated by using three-dimensional CT and MRI case examples. ^©RSNA, 2020.

Reliability of the modified Walch classification for advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis using 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis: a study of the ASES B2 Glenoid Multicenter Research Group

BACKGROUND

Variations in glenoid morphology affect surgical treatment and outcome of advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability of the modified Walch classification using 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) imaging in a multicenter research group.

METHODS

Deidentified preoperative CTs of patients with primary glenohumeral OA undergoing anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) were reviewed with 3D imaging software by 23 experienced shoulder surgeons across 19 institutions. CTs were separated into 2 groups for review: group 1 (96 cases involving all modified Walch classification categories evaluated by 12 readers) and group 2 (98 cases involving posterior glenoid deformity categories [B2, B3, C1, C2] evaluated by 11 readers other than the first 12). Each case group was reviewed by the same set of readers 4 different times (with and without the glenoid vault model present), blindly and in random order. Inter- and intraobserver reliabilities were calculated to assess agreement (slight, fair, moderate, substantial, almost perfect) within groups and by modified Walch classification categories.

RESULTS

Interobserver reliability showed fair to moderate agreement for both groups. Group 1 had a kappa of 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38, 0.48) with the glenoid vault model absent and 0.41 (95% CI: 0.37, 0.46) with it present. Group 2 had a kappa of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.33, 0.43) with the glenoid vault model absent and 0.37 (95% CI: 0.32, 0.43) with it present. Intraobserver reliability showed substantial agreement for group 1 with (0.63, range 0.47-0.71) and without (0.61, range 0.52-0.69) the glenoid vault model present. For group 2, intraobserver reliability showed moderate agreement with the glenoid vault model absent (0.51, range 0.30-0.72), which improved to substantial agreement with the glenoid vault model present (0.61, range 0.34-0.87).

DISCUSSION

Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the modified Walch classification were fair to moderate and moderate to substantial, respectively, using standardized 3D CT imaging analysis in a large multicenter study. The findings potentially suggest that cases with a spectrum of posterior glenoid bone loss and/or dysplasia can be harder to distinguish by modified Walch type because of a lack of defined thresholds, and the glenoid vault model may be beneficial in determining Walch type in certain scenarios. The ability to reproducibly separate patients into groups based on preoperative pathology, including Walch type, is important for future studies to accurately evaluate postoperative outcomes in TSA patient cohorts.

Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of pathologic correction in total shoulder arthroplasty based on severity of preoperative pathology

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to quantify correction of glenoid deformity and humeral head alignment in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty as a function of preoperative pathology (modified Walch classification) and glenoid implant type in a clinical cohort using 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) analysis.

METHODS

Patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with a standard glenoid (SG) (n = 110) or posteriorly stepped augmented glenoid (AG) (n = 62) component were evaluated with a preoperative CT scan and a postoperative CT scan within 3 months of surgery. Glenoid version, inclination, and medial-lateral (ML) joint line position, as well as humeral head alignment, were assessed on both CT scans, with preoperative-to-postoperative changes analyzed relative to pathology and premorbid anatomy based on the modified Walch classification and glenoid implant type.

RESULTS

On average, correction to the premorbid ML joint line position was significantly less in type A2 glenoids than in type A1 glenoids (-2.3 ± 2.1 mm vs. 1.1 ± 0.9 mm, P < .001). Correction to premorbid version was not different between type B2 glenoids with AG components and type A1 glenoids with SG components (-1.7° ± 6.6° vs. -1.0° ± 4.0°, P = .57), and the premorbid ML joint line position was restored on average in both groups (0.3 ± 1.6 mm vs. 1.1 ± 0.9 mm, P = .006). Correction to premorbid version was not different between type B3 glenoids with AG components and type A1 glenoids with SG components (-0.6° ± 5.1° vs. -1.0° ± 4.0°, P = .72), but correction relative to the premorbid ML joint line position was significantly less in type B3 glenoids with AG components than in type A1 glenoids with SG components (-2.2 ± 2.1 mm vs. 1.1 ± 0.9 mm, P < .001). Postoperative humeral glenoid alignment was not different in any group comparisons.

DISCUSSION

In cases with posterior glenoid bone loss and retroversion (type B2 or B3 glenoids), an AG component can better correct retroversion and the glenoid ML joint line position compared with an SG component, with correction to premorbid version comparable to a type A1 glenoid with an SG component. However, restoration of the premorbid ML joint line position may not always be possible with SG or AG components in cases with more advanced central glenoid bone loss (type A2 or B3 glenoids). Further follow-up is needed to determine the clinical consequences of these findings.

Custom-made reverse shoulder arthroplasty for severe glenoid bone loss: review of the literature and our preliminary results

The treatment of severe glenoid bone loss in shoulder arthroplasty represents a challenge, and the results of current prosthetic designs with only glenoid fixation still remain unsatisfactory. In the past decade, customized glenoid prostheses have been developed to address severe glenoid arthritis and in the revision setting. In this review, we analyzed the current surgical options, the classification limits, past literature evidence, and our preliminary results of 6 patients (3 male, 3 female) treated with a reverse implant and custom-made glenoid implant (ProMade; LimaCorporate, Italy). Computer analysis of the residual shape and the amount of glenoid bone stock in association with new classifications could help the surgeon to obtain good clinical and radiological outcomes. The development of navigation systems could improve the adequacy of the implant and, thus, the reliability and longevity of the implant itself.

Total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes after noncorrective, concentric reaming of B2 glenoids

Background

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is an effective procedure for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) delivering reliable pain relief and improved shoulder function. Abnormal glenoid morphologies are common, and biconcave glenoids are enigmas that have been associated with poor clinical outcomes and implant survivorship.

Purpose

To assess the clinical outcome scores of patients who underwent noncorrective, concentric reaming for TSA with biconcave glenoids (B2). We hypothesized that patients with B2 glenoids who underwent TSA with glenoid implantation using noncorrective, concentric reaming would have significant improvements in clinical outcome scores and high implant survivorship.

Methods

All patients who underwent anatomic TSA for GHOA with B2 glenoids, performed by a single surgeon, between July 2006 and December 2015 with minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed. Walch classification was obtained from preoperative imaging (magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography). Clinical outcome scores were prospectively collected and included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey physical component summary (PCS), and patient satisfaction. Clinical failures (revision TSA surgery or conversion to reverse TSA) and complications were reported. Paired t test and bivariate correlations level of significance was set at P = .05. Survivorship analysis with implant failure as an endpoint was done using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

Results

51 TSA in 49 patients (9 females, 40 males) with primary GHOA with B2 glenoids were performed with a mean age of 64 (range 36-81 years) at the time of surgery. The mean retroversion was 19.1° (range 5.4°-38°), and posterior decentering was 42.0% (range 19.4%-78.5%). At final evaluation, 45/51 anatomic TSAs (88% follow-up) with a mean follow-up of 4.9 years (range 2.0-10.4 years) were assessed. All clinical outcome scores improved significantly pre- to postoperatively: ASES, 52.5 to 79.6 (P < .001); SANE, 52.4 to 74.7 (P < .001); QuickDASH, 39.2 to 19.1 (P = .001); and PCS, 40.9 to 48.9 (P = .001). Median postoperative satisfaction was 9 (range 1-10). There were 2 failures and 4 that required another surgery —subscapularis repair, lysis of adhesions, irrigation and débridement, and one to explore the status of the subscapularis for persistent pain. The implant survivorship rate was 95% at a mean follow-up of 4.9 years.

Conclusion

Anatomic total shoulder replacement with minimally noncorrective, concentric reaming in patients with B2 glenoids had significant improvement in clinical outcome scores, high patient satisfaction, and high survivorship in this cohort.

Total shoulder arthroplasty with an anterior-offset humeral head in patients with a B2 glenoid

Background

To address severe posterior subluxation associated with the Walch B2 glenoid deformity, the eccentricity of the prosthetic humeral head can be reversed, allowing the humerus to remain in a relatively posterior position while the prosthetic humeral head remains well-centered on the glenoid. This study describes the short-term outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) using this technique.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients with a B2 glenoid who underwent TSA with the prosthetic eccentric humeral head rotated anteriorly for excessive posterior subluxation noted intraoperatively. Medical records were reviewed for visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores. Final radiographs were analyzed for instability, lesser tuberosity osteotomy healing, and glenoid loosening.

Results

Twenty patients were included with outcome scores at a mean of 48 months. Mean VAS (P < .0001), ASES (P < .0001), and SST (P < .0001) scores improved significantly. Using the Lazarus classification for glenoid loosening, 5 patients had grade 1 lucency and 2 had grade 2 lucency at a mean of 24 months' follow-up. The remaining 13 patients had no glenoid lucencies. Radiographic decentering was reduced from a mean of 9.9% ± 5.7% preoperatively to 0.5% ± 3.0% postoperatively (P < .001). There were no cases of lesser tuberosity repair failures or revision surgery.

Conclusion

TSA in patients with a B2 glenoid with a reversed, anterior-offset humeral head to address residual posterior subluxation resulted in excellent functional outcomes at short-term follow-up with improvement in humeral head centering. Early radiographic follow-up suggests low risks of progressive glenoid lucencies and component loosening.

Clinical characteristics and patient-reported outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty after anterior stabilization: a retrospective matched control study

BACKGROUND

Instability arthropathy is a known cause of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) among patients with and without prior shoulder stabilization. This study aims to compare the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores among total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) patients with and without a history of shoulder stabilization.

METHODS

A case-control study was performed comparing 20 patients with a history of anterior shoulder stabilization (11 open, 9 arthroscopic) who underwent TSA to a matched cohort of 20 TSA patients without a history of shoulder surgery (mean follow-up = 2.8 years). Patients were matched by sex, age, and baseline American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score within 10 points (mean age 59.6 ± 9.6 years). Patient characteristics, operative findings, and preoperative and postoperative radiographic characteristics for both groups were reported. Comparisons were made regarding PROM scores (ASES, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Shoulder Activity Scale [SAS], numeric rating scale for pain) at baseline, 2 years, and 5 years and patient satisfaction at 2 years.

RESULTS

Intraoperative findings of subscapularis scarring or attenuation was common among patients with prior anterior stabilization. The instability cohort did have a higher percentage of B2/B3 glenoid types than the OA cohort (45% vs. 15%), but this was not significantly different possibly because of the small sample size. At 2 years, both instability and OA groups reported significant improvement in pain, function, and activity level. There was no difference between groups on any PROMs or patient satisfaction level. At 5 years, instability patients had significantly lower scores on the ASES and the SF-12 PCS than the OA group.

CONCLUSION

There was notable alterations in both soft tissue and bony morphology among patients with prior anterior stabilization. After TSA, both instability and primary OA groups showed significant improvements at 2 years. However, PROMs for instability patients deteriorated at 5 years compared with the control group. Complex bony and soft tissue imbalances may contribute to more unpredictable long-term PROM scores. Thoughtful preoperative consideration of these factors should influence decision making regarding selection of TSA for management of OA in this complex patient cohort.

Patient-specific planning in shoulder arthroplasty

AIMS

Patient-specific instrumentation has been shown to increase a surgeon's precision and accuracy in placing the glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty. There is, however, little available information about the use of patient-specific planning (PSP) tools for this operation. It is not known how these tools alter the decision-making patterns of shoulder surgeons. The aim of this study was to investigate whether PSP, when compared with the use of plain radiographs or select static CT images, influences the understanding of glenoid pathology and surgical planning.

METHODS

A case-based survey presented surgeons with a patient's history, physical examination, and, sequentially, radiographs, select static CT images, and PSP with a 3D imaging program. For each imaging modality, the surgeons were asked to identify the Walch classification of the glenoid and to propose the surgical treatment. The participating surgeons were grouped according to the annual volume of shoulder arthroplasties that they undertook, and responses were compared with the recommendations of two experts.

RESULTS

A total of 59 surgeons completed the survey. For all surgeons, the use of the PSP significantly increased agreement with the experts in glenoid classification (x² = 8.54; p = 0.014) and surgical planning (x² = 37.91; p < 0.001). The additional information provided by the PSP also showed a significantly higher impact on surgical decision-making for surgeons who undertake fewer than ten shoulder arthroplasties annually (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

The information provided by PSP has the greatest impact on the surgical decision-making of low volume surgeons (those who perform fewer than ten shoulder arthroplasties annually), and PSP brings all surgeons in to closer agreement with the recommendations of experts for glenoid classification and surgical planning. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(3):365-370.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for B2 Glenoid Deformity

In shoulder osteoarthritis, the B2 glenoid presents challenges in treatment because of the excessive retroversion and posterior deficiency of the glenoid. Correction of retroversion and maintenance of a stable joint line with well-fixed implants are essential for the successful treatment of this deformity with arthroplasty. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty offers several key advantages in achieving this goal, including favorable biomechanics, a well-fixed baseplate, and proven success in other applications. Techniques such as eccentric reaming, bone grafting, and baseplate augmentation allow surgeons to tailor treatment to the patient’s altered anatomy. Eccentric reaming is favored for correction of small defects or mild version anomalies. Current trends favor bone grafting for larger corrections, though augmented components have shown early promise with the potential for expanded use. With overall promising results reported in the literature, reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a useful tool for treating older patients with B2 glenoid deformities.

Outcomes of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with B2 Glenoids: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Total shoulder arthroplasty remains an effective procedure for shoulder pain relief. Despite the negative effect of abnormal glenoid morphology and specifically retroverted and posteriorly subluxated glenoids, there is no consensus for management of B2 glenoids in total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes and complication rates for B2 glenoid techniques so as to provide a baseline understanding of the current state of treatment of this pathology.

METHODS

A systematic review evaluating outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty with biconcave glenoids using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology included searches up to December 31, 2015, of PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Reviews, and Google Scholar. Nine articles met inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

In this study, 239 total shoulder arthroplasties with B2 glenoids with a mean follow-up of 55.5 months (range, 24 to 91 months) were included. The mean patient age was 63.3 years (range, 55.8 to 68.7 years). Asymmetric reaming was performed in 127 glenoids, posterior bone-grafting was included in 53 glenoids, and 34 received an augmented glenoid component to correct glenoid retroversion and bone loss. Overall, the mean Constant and Neer scores improved from preoperative measures. Fifty-eight percent of patients had no loosening, and 42% had some loosening, although not all of these patients were symptomatic. Despite variation in outcome measures hindering treatment approach comparison, the posteriorly augmented glenoid was generally reported to provide better outcomes with few complications. Although posterior glenoid bone-grafting results in acceptable outcomes, it also represents the highest rate of complications. The revision rate was 15.6% for asymmetric reaming, 9.5% for posterior glenoid bone-grafting, and 0% for posteriorly augmented glenoids.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of the B2 glenoid remains a challenge to the shoulder surgeon, with worse outcomes and higher complication rates. Longer follow-up, consistent outcome measures, and result stratification based on glenoid type may allow for direct comparison in the future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with posterior capsular plication versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with biconcave glenoids: A matched cohort study

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with posterior capsule plication (PCP) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with primary osteoarthritis, posterior subluxation, and bone loss (Walch B2).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All shoulders undergoing anatomic TSA with PCP were retrospectively identified (group 1, G1) and compared to shoulders undergoing RSA (group 2, G2) for Walch B2 osteoarthritis. There were 15 patients in G1 (mean (SD) age and follow-up of 70.5 (7.5) years and 42.8 (18.4) months, respectively) and 16 patients in G2 (mean (SD) age and follow-up of 72.6 (5.4) years and 35.1 (14.2) months, respectively).

RESULTS

Both groups had substantial improvements in pain and function. In G1, results were excellent in 80% and satisfactory in 20%, compared to 81% and 6% in G2, respectively ( p = 0.2). The mean (SD) American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 91.2 (6.7) and 80.3 (14.3) in G1 and G2, respectively ( p = 0.08). The mean Simple Shoulder Test score was 10.6 in G1 and 8.5 in G2 ( p = 0.01). There were no reoperations in either group, but G1 had seven postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of TSA with PCP are comparable to RSA in patients with osteoarthritis and biconcave glenoids. However, TSA leads to more complications while RSA leads to lower functional outcomes.

Outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with excessive glenoid retroversion: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Ideal management of severe glenoid retroversion during anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) remains controversial, as previous reports have suggested that severe retroversion may negatively impact clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of severe glenoid retroversion on clinical and radiographic TSA outcomes using a standard glenoid component, as well as to compare outcomes among patients with less severe retroversion.

METHODS

A case-control study was performed comparing 40 patients treated with TSA with more than 20° of glenoid retroversion preoperatively (average follow-up, 53 months) vs. a matched cohort of 80 patients with less than 20° of retroversion (average follow-up, 49 months). In all patients, the surgical technique, implant design, and postoperative rehabilitation protocol were identical. Patients were matched based on sex, age, indication, and prosthetic size. Comparisons were made regarding patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), motion, postoperative radiographic loosening, and the presence of medial calcar resorption.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, both groups demonstrated similar PROMs and measured motion, except for preoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons total scores, which were higher for the severe retroversion group (44.4 vs. 31.3 [P = .012] and 34.9 vs. 29.4 [P = .048], respectively). Postoperative PROMs and motion were also similar between the 2 cohorts. No significant differences were observed for postoperative radiographic findings. Medial calcar resorption was identified in 74 patients (61.7%). Calcar resorption and individual resorption grades were not found to differ significantly.

CONCLUSION

At midterm follow-up, preoperative severe glenoid retroversion does not appear to influence clinical or radiographic outcomes of TSA using a standard glenoid component.

[Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff defect arthropathy]

BACKGROUND

In a progredient rotator cuff tear with tendon retraction, fatty infiltration and atrophy of rotator cuff muscles the humerus cannot be centered and stabilized sufficiently in the glenohumeral joint. This leads to rotator cuff defect arthropathy as an eccentric osteoarthritis with acetabularization and wear of the acromion, as well as of the glenoid.

INDICATION

A painful pseudoparalysis of the shoulder indicates the implantation of a reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) to reduce pain and restore active motion. The rTSA improves the motoric function of the deltoid muscle by medialization and caudalization of the center of rotation via an optimized lever arm and is also indicated in cranio-caudally centered osteoarthritis with static posterior humeral decentration due to a bi-concavely eroded glenoid.

THERAPY

Currently, humeral anatomical resection with an inclination of 135° and a humeral retrotorsion of 20-40°, in rTSA in contrast to 155° inclination, has been shown to lead to better glenohumeral motion without loss of stability. Additionally, a reduced glenohumeral offset should be restored by especially bony lateral augmentation of the glenoid. In a pre-operatively positive lag sign for external rotation caused by a rupture of the infraspinatus/teres minor tendon, a lateral latissimus/teres major muscle tendon transfer in rTSA can optimize active external rotation. The tendon of the subscapularis muscle should be re-fixated in the deltopectoral approach for rTSA whenever possible for better anterior stability of the glenohumeral joint. Larger diameters of the glenospheres have been shown to have more stability and better motion. Humeral metaphyseal metal liners with corresponding polyethylene glenospheres can avoid osteolysis of the inferior scapular neck caused by polyethylene debris due to impingement of the humeral liner at the scapular neck.

[Shoulder Osteoarthritis-pathogenesis, classification, diagnostics and treatment]

Primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder represents a destructive joint disease with associated synovitis, which in the first line seems to be genetically determined. Clinically, patients suffer from shoulder pain with progressive impairment of both active and passive range of motion. The diagnostics include a clinical examination, imaging by native radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessment of the rotator cuff. Current classification systems consider the formation of humeral osteophytes, glenoid morphology and loss of humeral sphericity. Non-surgical measures include, apart from topical and oral analgesics, injection of corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid supported by physiotherapeutic measures. After failure of non-surgical therapeutic measures, arthroscopic joint-preserving arthroplasty in terms of the comprehensive arthroscopic management (CAM) procedure can be performed in young patients with early stage osteoarthritis, whereas in advanced stages endoprosthetic joint replacement is indicated.

Imaging of the B2 Glenoid: An Assessment of Glenoid Wear

Background

Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) carries a spectrum of morphology and wear patterns of the glenoid surface exemplified by complex patterns such as glenoid biconcavity and acquired retroversion seen in the B2 glenoid. Multiple imaging methods are available for evaluation of the complex glenoid structure seen in B2 glenoids. The purpose of this article is to review imaging assessment of the type B2 glenoid.

Methods

The current literature on imaging of the B2 glenoid was reviewed to describe the unique anatomy of this OA variant and how to appropriately assess its characteristics.

Results

Plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, and standard 2-dimensional computed tomography (CT) have all shown acceptable assessments of arthritic glenoids but lack the detailed and highly accurate evaluation of bone loss and retroversion seen with 3-dimensional CT.

Conclusion

Accurate preoperative identification of complex B2 pathology on imaging remains essential in planning and achieving precise implant placement at the time of shoulder arthroplasty.

Interobserver and intraobserver comparison of imaging glenoid morphology, glenoid version and humeral head subluxation

BACKGROUND

Glenoid morphology, glenoid version and humeral head subluxation represent important parameters for the treating physician. The most common method of assessing glenoid morphology is the Walch classification which has only been validated with computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

CT images and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images of 25 patients were de-identified and randomized. Three reviewers assessed the images for each parameter twice. The Walch classification was assessed with a weighted kappa value. Glenoid version and humeral head subluxation were comparted with a reproducibility coefficient.

RESULTS

The Walch classification demonstrated almost perfect intraobserver agreement for MRI and CT images (k = 0.87). Weighted interobserver agreement values for the Walch classification were fair for CT and MRI (k = 0.34). The weighted reproducibility coefficient for glenoid version measured 9.13 (CI 7.16-12.60) degrees for CT and 13.44 (CI 10.54-18.55) degrees for MRI images. The weighted reproducibility coefficient for percentage of humeral head subluxation was 17.43% (CI 13.67-24.06) for CT and 18.49% (CI 14.5-25.52) for MRI images.

DISCUSSION

CT and MRI images demonstrated similar efficacy in classifying glenoid morphology, measuring glenoid version and measuring posterior humeral head subluxation. MRI can be used as an alternative to CT for measuring these parameters.

Multilevel glenoid morphology and retroversion assessment in Walch B2 and B3 types

OBJECTIVE

A major factor that impacts the long-term outcome and complication rates of total shoulder arthroplasty is the preoperative posterior glenoid bone loss quantified by glenoid retroversion. The purpose of this study was to assess if glenoid retroversion varies significantly at different glenoid heights in Walch B2 and B3 glenoids.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with B2 and B3 glenoid types were included following retrospective review of 386 consecutive CT shoulder studies performed for arthroplasty preoperative planning. True axial CT reconstructions were created using a validated technique. Two readers independently measured the glenoid retroversion angles according to the Friedman method using the "intermediate" glenoid at three glenoid heights: 75% (upper), 50% (equator), and 25% (lower). The variances between the three levels for a given patient were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine B2 and 8 B3 glenoid types were included. There was no significant difference in variance of glenoid version among the three levels in B2 or B3 groups. The mean variance in retroversion degree between equator-lower, upper-equator, and upper-lower glenoid was - 0.4, 0.3, and - 0.2 for B2; and - 0.2, 1.9, and 1.9 for B3 glenoid, respectively. The level of inter-reader agreement was fair to good for variance at equator-lower, and good to excellent for upper-equator and upper-lower glenoid.

CONCLUSIONS

Glenoid version can be accurately measured at any level between 25 and 75% of glenoid height for Walch B2 and B3. We recommend that the glenoid equator be used as the reference to assure consistent and reliable version measurements in this group of patients.