1
|
Postoperative Rehabilitation of Multidirectional Instability Surgery: A Systematic Review. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2021; 29:88-93. [PMID: 33972485 DOI: 10.1097/jsa.0000000000000313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Multidirectional instability (MDI) of the shoulder is managed with surgery when conservative rehabilitation fails. The optimal postsurgical management of MDI is not well understood. The purpose of this study is to create a systematic review evaluating postsurgical rehabilitation protocols treating MDI. Articles were included if a postsurgical rehabilitation protocol was described following surgical treatment for MDI. Identified articles underwent 2 phases of screening by blinded team members. Remaining articles had their level of evidence determined by a predefined grading system, ranging from levels I to V. Articles with evidence levels I to IV were included in analysis. Of the 163 articles identified in the literature, 9 were included in this study. Surgical techniques examined in these articles include capsular plication, rotator interval closure, and capsular shift. Rehabilitation protocols were evaluated for duration of treatment and physical therapy modalities. Article results were evaluated for subjective and objective measures of protocol success. Overall, there is a lack of evidence to indicate the optimal rehabilitation protocol post-MDI surgery. Further research is needed to compare rehabilitation protocols following specific surgical procedures to determine their effect on postsurgical patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
2
|
Alkaduhimi H, Connelly JW, van Deurzen DFP, Eygendaal D, van den Bekerom MPJ. High Variability of the Definition of Recurrent Glenohumeral Instability: An Analysis of the Current Literature by a Systematic Review. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2021; 3:e951-e966. [PMID: 34195665 PMCID: PMC8220632 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine the definitions for recurrence used in the literature, assess the consensus in using these definitions, and determine the impact of these definitions on recurrence rates. Methods A literature search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE including studies from 2000 to 2020 reporting on recurrence rates after anterior arthroscopic shoulder instability surgery. Dislocation, apprehension, subluxation and recurrence rates were compared. Results Ninety-one studies were included. In 68% of the eligible studies, recurrence rates are not well defined. Thirty (33%) studies did not report on dislocations, 45 (49%) did not report on subluxations, and 58 (64%) did not report on apprehension. Seventeen different definitions for recurrence of instability, 4 definitions of dislocations, and 8 definitions of subluxation were used. Conclusion Recurrence rates are poorly specified and likely underreported in the literature, hampering comparison with results of other studies. This highlights the need for a consensus on definition of recurrence across shoulder instability studies. We recommend not using the definition recurrence of instability anymore. We endorse defining dislocations as a radiographically confirmed dislocation or a dislocation that is manually reduced, subluxations as the feeling of a dislocation that can be (spontaneously) reduced without the need for a radiographically confirmed dislocation, and a positive apprehension sign as fear of imminent dislocation when placing the arm in abduction and external rotation during physical examination. Reporting on the events resulting in a dislocation or subluxation aids in making an estimation of the severity of instability. Level of Evidence Level IV, systematic review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James W Connelly
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
| | | | - Denise Eygendaal
- Orthopaedic Department, Amphia Ziekenhuis, Breda, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michel P J van den Bekerom
- Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Joint Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ockert B, Biermann N, Nebelung W, Wiedemann E. [Arthroscopic soft tissue stabilization of posttraumatic anterior shoulder instability : Techniques, limitations and long-term results]. Unfallchirurg 2017; 121:108-116. [PMID: 29134236 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-017-0438-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Arthroscopic soft tissue stabilization is a well-established and broadly accepted procedure to treat posttraumatic shoulder instability. Advantages in comparison to open stabilization procedures include improved visualization of the structural damage and a less invasive approach. Technical developments in recent years have led to further improvement of the arthroscopic technique for shoulder instability. This article presents a description of principles and new developments as it contains basic techniques including patient positioning, access portals, preparation of the glenoid bone, soft tissue handling and shuttle techniques. Modern suture anchor systems to achieve arthroscopic stabilization with the corresponding advantages and disadvantages are also presented. Furthermore, the limitations and long-term results of arthroscopic soft tissue stabilization are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Ockert
- Sektion Schulter- und Ellenbogenchirurgie, Klinik für Allgemeine, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Klinikum der Universität München (LMU), Nußbaumstr. 20, 80336, München, Deutschland.
| | - N Biermann
- Sektion Schulter- und Ellenbogenchirurgie, Klinik für Allgemeine, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Klinikum der Universität München (LMU), Nußbaumstr. 20, 80336, München, Deutschland
| | - W Nebelung
- Sportorthopädie Düsseldorf, Marienkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf-Kaiserswerth, Deutschland
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Shoulder instability ranges from subtle instability to frank dislocation. Our understanding on the subject is getting better. Patient lifestyle, increased awareness/expectations, better availability of information, improved imaging modalities, and increased awareness about the previously less known concepts in instability all add to the challenges of managing the problem. History and clinical examination without over reliance on imaging remain essential. We used Embase, PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network and Google Scholar search for published literature in English. We used various combinations of the keywords, namely, human shoulder instability, sports injuries, dislocation, surgery, latarjet, glenohumeral, glenoid, and arthroscopy from 1980 to March 2017. The systematic search captured 310 publications. After applying initial exclusion criteria, 41 abstracts were assessed for eligibility. Of these, we selected 20 full-text articles with the majority of focus primarily on surgical management of traumatic shoulder instability. A tailor-made approach for the management of the individual patient is essential and should involve shared decision making. In this article, we have tried to simplify and present the current evidence in the management of traumatic shoulder instability, particularly in sportsperson.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suresh Srinivasan
- Upper Limb Unit, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Musculoskeletal Directorate, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
| | - Radhakant Pandey
- Upper Limb Unit, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Musculoskeletal Directorate, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK,Address for correspondence: Mr. Radhakant Pandey, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Randomized controlled trial of arthroscopic electrothermal capsulorrhaphy with Bankart repair and isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24:414-21. [PMID: 25711628 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3543-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2014] [Accepted: 02/10/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Electrothermal arthroscopic capsulorrhaphy (ETAC) was introduced as an adjunct to shoulder stabilization surgery to address capsular laxity in the treatment of traumatic anterior dislocation. No previous RCT has compared arthroscopic Bankart repair with ETAC of the medial glenohumeral ligament and anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament versus undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair alone. Our hypothesis was that there would be no difference in quality of life between these two groups. Complication/failure rates were also compared. METHODS Eighty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive arthroscopic Bankart repair with (n = 44) or without ETAC (n = 44). Post-operative visits occurred at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months with WOSI, ASES, and Constant scores completed, and rates of dislocation/subluxation were determined. RESULTS Data on 74 patients were analysed, with the rest lost to follow-up. There were no differences between groups at any post-surgery time points for WOSI, ASES, or Constant scores (n.s.). Eight patients in the no-ETAC group and 7 in the ETAC group were considered failures (n.s.). CONCLUSIONS No benefits in patient-reported outcome or recurrence rates using ETAC were found. Mean WOSI scores 2 years post-surgery were virtually identical for the two groups. ETAC could not be shown to provide benefit or detriment when combined with arthroscopic labral repair for traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen D, Goldberg J, Herald J, Critchley I, Barmare A. Effects of surgical management on multidirectional instability of the shoulder: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24:630-9. [PMID: 26658564 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3901-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2015] [Accepted: 11/23/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of arthroscopic and open surgical techniques on the treatment of shoulder multidirectional instability. METHODS Literature searches were conducted using the databases MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane Library, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Original articles on the surgical management of multidirectional instability were retrieved against selection criteria. Data were extracted and divided into three groups by surgical technique. Proportion and mean meta-analyses were performed for comparison. RESULTS The available evidence was from 35 level IV and 1 level II studies. The recurrent instability rate was 9.9 % (95 % CI 7.3-12.9 %) in open capsular shift (OCS) group and 6.0 % (95 % CI 3.7-8.9 %) in arthroscopic capsular plication (ACP) group, between which no difference was observed. However, thermal capsular shrinkage (TCS) group resulted in a recurrent instability rate of 23.9 % (95 % CI 16.6-32.2 %), significantly higher than the above two groups. OCS and ACP groups revealed low reoperation rates of approximately 5.2 % (95 % CI 2.7-8.5 %) and 4.8 % (95 % CI 2.3-8.0 %), respectively, which are lower than that in TCS group of 16.9 % (95 % CI 12.4-21.8 %). OCS caused more loss of external rotation than ACP, losing 7.0 (95 % CI 3.3-10.6) degrees versus 2 (95 % CI 0.9-2.4) degrees, respectively. CONCLUSIONS ACP and OCS techniques have similar primary outcomes, but the former causes less post-operative stiffness. It is suggestible to avoid TCS in the treatment of MDI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Chen
- Orthopaedic Department, Goulburn Valley Health, The University of Melbourne, Shepparton, VIC, 3630, Australia.
| | - Jerome Goldberg
- Prince of Wales Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan Herald
- Orthopaedic Department, Bankstown Hospital, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ian Critchley
- Orthopaedic Department, Goulburn Valley Health, The University of Melbourne, Shepparton, VIC, 3630, Australia
| | - Arshad Barmare
- Orthopaedic Department, Goulburn Valley Health, The University of Melbourne, Shepparton, VIC, 3630, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Merolla G, Cerciello S, Chillemi C, Paladini P, De Santis E, Porcellini G. Multidirectional instability of the shoulder: biomechanics, clinical presentation, and treatment strategies. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY 2015; 25:975-85. [PMID: 25638224 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1606-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2014] [Accepted: 01/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Multidirectional instability (MDI) of the shoulder is a condition where the dislocation occurs in more than one direction with minimal or no causative trauma. Its pathoanatomy is complex and characterized by a redundant capsule, resulting in increased glenohumeral joint volume. The fact that several further factors may contribute to symptom onset complicates the diagnosis and hampers the identification of a therapeutic approach suitable for all cases. There is general agreement that the initial treatment should be conservative and that surgery should be reserved for patients who have not responded to an ad hoc rehabilitation program. We review the biomechanics, clinical presentation, and treatment strategies of shoulder MDI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Merolla
- Unit of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, "D. Cervesi" Hospital, Cattolica, AUSL della Romagna Ambito Territoriale di Rimini, Cattolica, Italy,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|