Radial clubhand with congenital absence of elbow flexors treated by pedicled latissimus dorsi bipolar transfer: report of one case

Long Head of Triceps Tendon Transfer for Agenesis of Biceps and Brachialis: Two Cases

Congenital lack of elbow flexion results in significant disability and may be seen in conjunction with syndromes, plexopathies, neuromuscular disorders, or as an isolated muscular agenesis of elbow flexors. There are many tendon transfer options to address this issue, but there is a lack of data on the functional results in the pediatric population. In this series, we present 1 patient with isolated muscular agenesis of the biceps and brachialis musculotendinous units and another with this same muscular agenesis in the setting of arthrogryposis. They were treated with anterior ulnar nerve transposition and transfer of the long head of triceps tendon around 2 years of age resulting in functional elbow flexion in both patients.

Bipolar Latissimus Dorsi Transfer for Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita: Minimum 10-Month Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To examine the outcomes of patients who have undergone bipolar latissimus dorsi transfer for loss of elbow flexion in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC).

METHODS

This study retrospectively evaluated 6 cases (5 patients) of bipolar latissimus dorsi transfer performed to restore active elbow flexion in pediatric patients with AMC. Elbow range of motion and strength were evaluated before and after surgery. Functional outcomes were evaluated by the patients' ability to perform activities of daily living. Complications and patient satisfaction were also evaluated at final follow-up.

RESULTS

The patients were a mean age of 7.8 ± 3 years. The mean follow-up was 30.2 months (range, 10-44 months). At most recent follow-up, all cases reported improved function of the surgical extremity when performing activities of daily living and overall satisfaction. The postoperative active range of motion was 76° ± 14°. All cases had active elbow flexion against gravity. One patient was noted to have decreased muscle activation of the transfer 6 months after surgery, but strength improved by the 10-month follow-up. No other complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend bipolar latissimus dorsi transfer as a reliable option to restore functional elbow flexion in patients with AMC. Meticulous pedicle handling and assessment of the latissimus dorsi viability is paramount.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic V.

Anatomic study of pedicled bipolar teres major transfer for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears

BACKGROUND

Treatment of rotator cuff (RC) tears has not included bipolar muscle-tendon transfers to date. The objective of this study was to verify the feasibility of pedicled bipolar teres major (TM) transfer over and under the long head of the triceps brachii (LHT) and compare its versatility with monopolar transfer in a model of supraspinatus (SS) tears in cadavers.

METHODS

In 6 shoulders of cryopreserved cadavers, we re-created complete SS tears, conducting monopolar and bipolar TM transfers over and under LHT. We compared the morphology of the SS and TM, defect coverage, angle between the transferred TM and major SS axis, and axillary nerve overlap with each technique.

RESULTS

The TM and SS were morphologically similar. Defect coverage was significantly lower with monopolar transfer (12 ± 4 mm) than with bipolar transfer (39 ± 9 mm under the LHT, P = .003, and 38 ± 8 mm over the LHT, P = .004). The bipolar transfer course over the LHT was the nearest to the SS axis (39° ± 11°, P = .005). We found a greater axillary nerve overlap with bipolar transfer under the LHT (27 ± 8 mm) than with bipolar transfer over the LHT (1 ± 2 mm, P = .005) or monopolar transfer (0 mm, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Bipolar TM transfer is possible without neurovascular pedicle interference, obtaining greater RC defect coverage and the closest path to the SS axis when conducted over the LHT compared with monopolar or bipolar transfer under the LHT. Accordingly, it can be considered an alternative option for the treatment of posterosuperior RC defects.

Is bipolar latissimus dorsi transfer a reliable option to restore elbow flexion in children with arthrogryposis? A review of 13 tendon transfers

BACKGROUND

Scant data are published about different available therapeutic options for restoration of active elbow flexion in arthrogryposis with varying degrees of improvement. In this retrospective study we evaluated medium-term effects of bipolar latissimus dorsi transfer in patients with arthrogryposis.

METHODS

Pedicled latissimus dorsi bipolar muscle transfer was used to restore elbow flexion in 11 patients (13 limbs) with arthrogryposis. Elbow and shoulder range of motions and strength of elbow flexion were measured preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The functional use of the upper limb was examined by observation of activities of daily living and presence of adaptive mechanisms. General satisfaction was assessed at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

The patients were a mean age of 5.69 ± 2.49 years. The follow-up period was 27.31 ± 17.8 months. At the last examination, according to transferred muscle function and elbow range of motion, function of 12 limbs was graded as excellent and good, and 1 was graded poor. The active postoperative elbow range of motion was 97.7° ± 34.5°. The general satisfaction of the patients with the surgical results was 92.3%. Activities of daily living were improved in 10 of 13 limbs, but adaptive mechanisms were detected in all patients except 2 at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest pedicled bipolar latissimus dorsi transfer as a reliable therapeutic option to restore active elbow flexion in arthrogryposis with acceptable results regarding regaining range of motion and patient satisfaction. Functional passive elbow range of motion and good quality of latissimus dorsi muscle preoperatively is mandatory.

Single-stage Reconstruction of Elbow Flexion Associated with Massive Soft-Tissue Defect Using the Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Bipolar Rotational Transfer

In the upper extremity, the latissimus dorsi muscle can be used as an ipsilateral rotational muscle flap for soft-tissue coverage or functional reconstruction of arm and elbow. Patients who have both major soft-tissue loss and functional deficits can be successfully treated with a single-stage functional latissimus dorsi rotational muscle transfer that provides simultaneous soft-tissue coverage and functional reconstruction.

METHODS

Our data base was queried for all patients undergoing a rotational latissimus dorsi muscle transfer for simultaneous soft-tissue coverage and functional reconstruction of elbow flexion. Four patients were identified. A chart review documented the mechanism of injury, associated injuries, soft-tissue defect size, number of surgical procedures, length of follow-up, last elbow range of motion, and flexion strength.

RESULTS

Four patients with loss of elbow flexion due to traumatic loss of the anterior compartment muscles and the overlying soft tissue underwent simultaneous soft-tissue coverage and elbow flexorplasty using the ipsilateral latissimus dorsi as a bipolar muscle rotational tissue transfer. All flaps survived and had a recovery of Medical Research Council Grade 4/5 elbow flexion strength. No additional procedures were required for elbow flexion. The surgical technique is described and supplemented with surgical technique video and patient outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This patient series augments the data provided in other series supporting the safety and efficacy of this procedure which provides both soft-tissue coverage and functional restoration of elbow flexion as a single-stage procedure in the setting of massive traumatic soft-tissue loss of the arm.