Difference in vascular patterns between transosseous-equivalent and transosseous rotator cuff repair

Comparing Repaired Subscapularis Tendon Integrity Using Ultrasound in Onlay Versus Inlay Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background: The importance of the subscapularis tendon in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been increasingly emphasized lately. Recent studies have indicated that a repaired subscapularis tendon has better functional outcomes. This study is aimed at comparing the healing rate of repaired subscapularis tendons between onlay and inlay Bony Increased Offset-Reversed Shoulder Arthroplasty (BIO-RSA). Methods: This retrospective comparative review covers all patients who underwent BIO-RSA at a single center, comprising 189 cases performed by on a single surgeon from January 2012 till December 2021. We included all patients who underwent subscapularis tenotomy repair and who had a tendon ultrasound (US) examination at six months postoperatively (as requested in this single surgeon's usual protocol). These patients were divided into two comparable groups, an onlay group and an inlay group. Healing status was determined using the Sugaya classification, with healed subscapularis tendons defined as having Sugaya type I-III integrity and the unhealed tendons as having Sugaya type IV and V integrity. Results: In total, 2 patients were excluded because ultrasound was not performed (they missed their appointment); 187 patients were evaluated; 98 patients underwent an onlay BIO-RSA; and 89 patients underwent an inlay BIO-RSA. The healing rate of the repaired subscapularis tendon was 73% in the onlay group and 56% in the inlay one (p = 0.020). Conclusions: The onlay systems may enhance subscapularis tendon healing compared to the inlay one, possibly due to the preserved intramedullary vascularity and the near-normal tendon excursion that can be achieved by the onlay system. Choosing an onlay design can minimize bone cuts during RSA, while achieving good subscapularis tendon healing.

Assessing clinical and patient reported outcomes of Sironix suture anchors in rotator cuff and Bankart repair surgeries

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff tears and Bankart lesions significantly affect shoulder function and quality of life. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and Bankart repair has become the standard treatment for restoring function and reducing pain. Recent advancements include new suture anchor technologies, such as the Sironix suture anchor known for its biomechanical strength and promising outcomes. However, there are limited real-world data on its effectiveness and safety, particularly in the Indian population.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Sironix suture anchors in rotator cuff and Bankart repair surgeries.

METHODS

Sixty participants underwent surgery between January 2021 and December 2022, and demographic data and postoperative outcomes were collected through retrospective reviews and telephonic interviews. Validated scales, including the PENN Shoulder Score (PSS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), were utilized for assessment.

RESULTS

Treatment with Sironix suture anchor devices, including Ceptre Knotted UHMWPE Suture Titanium Anchor, Spyke Knotted UHMWPE Suture Peek Anchor, Stativ Knotted UHMWPE Suture Anchor, and Viplok Knotless Peek Screw Anchor with Titanium Tip, revealed no repair failures. Participants demonstrated high satisfaction and functional improvement, as evidenced by the mean Quick DASH score (32.01) and PSS (71.65) and the satisfactory SANE scores for both injured joints (74.33) and non-injured (83.67) shoulder joints.

CONCLUSION

The study yielded favorable outcomes for rotator cuff tear repair and Bankart repair. No repair failures were observed, supporting the safety and efficacy of these devices in shoulder injury management.

Revascularization character of autologous fascia lata graft following shoulder superior capsule reconstruction by enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Background

Fascia lata has been used for arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (ASCR) and verified to achieve a good clinical outcome. However, it is still not known about revascularization character of the fascia lata after ASCR. This study was performed to evaluate the revascularization of autologous fascia lata grafts after ASCR by enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

A prospective study of 19 patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears underwent ASCR with autologous fascia lata grafts from September 2019 to April 2021. Radiography examinations and clinical evaluations were performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months. The signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) value and enhancement index (EI) of autologous fascia lata grafts in the great tubercle insertion (GTI), midpoint of the graft (MG), and glenoid insertion (GI) were compared for radiography examination. Clinical evaluation included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score.

Results

The SNQ values in T1WI enhancement at GI and GTI were significantly higher than those at the plain MRI scan at all postoperative observation timepoints; however, the SNQ values in T1WI enhancement at MG did not show a significant difference until 3 months postoperation. EI values at GTI and GI were significantly higher than those at MG at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperation, while there was no significant difference in the EI value between GTI and GI. At 6 months postoperation, the EI value at GI was significantly higher than those at MG. At 12 months postoperation, the EI value at GI was significantly higher than those at MG and GTI; however, there was no significant difference between GTI and MG. The EI values at GTI and MG peaked at 3 months and 6 months postoperation, respectively, and then plateaued at 12 months postoperation. However, there was no significant difference in the EI value among the different postoperative timepoints at GI. The EI value did not correlate with the VAS and ASES, UCLA scores at any time point or any postoperative observation location.

Conclusion

Revascularization of the fascia lata was dependent on the location of the fascia lata and plateaus at 12 months postoperation. The EI value did not correlate with the VAS and ASES, UCLA scores during12 months postoperation.

Arthroscopic Anchorless Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair Produces Equivalent Clinical Outcomes and Imaging Results as a Standard Suture Bridge Technique with Anchors

Purpose

To compare the clinical and imaging outcome of arthroscopic transosseous (TO)-equivalent rotator cuff repair (RCR) with anchors with arthroscopic anchorless TO RCR at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively.

Methods

The study population included patients who underwent RCR using either an anchorless TO technique with a TO suture passing device (group A) and those who were matched for tear size and underwent RCR using suture anchors for repair (group B). The inclusion criterion was an easily reducible rotator cuff tear with a sagittal extension of 2 to 4 cm. After a minimum of 2 years, clinical outcome scores and magnetic resonance imaging were obtained. Tendon quality and footprint integration were evaluated using the Sugaya classification.

Results

Seventy patients were included. A total of 45 were in group A and 25 were in group B. Group A had 2 bone tunnels and 4 sutures using an X-box configuration, and group B had a suture bridge construct of 4 anchors. Group A and B had identical anteroposterior tear size and were comparable for age. The Constant score improved from 50 ± 17.4 to 88 ± 8.6 in group A versus 48 ± 14.5 to 87 ± 7.2 in B. The Subjective Shoulder Value rose from 47 ± 19.1 to 95 ± 7.4 in group A vs from 47 ± 19.4 to 95 ± 7.6 in B. Neither the preoperative (P ≥ .502) nor postoperative scores (P ≥ .29) showed a significant difference. Magnetic resonance imaging showed 2 small retears in group A and one in B, resulting in an identical 4% retear rate. The mean Sugaya type was 2.02 versus 2.24 (P = .206) for groups A versus B.

Conclusions

Anchorless TO RCR is a valid alternative to suture anchor techniques. Clinical outcome data showed comparable results for both techniques after a follow-up of 2 years. The healing results as observed on magnetic resonance imaging were also equivalent for both groups.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Surgical Technique of Arthroscopic Transosseous Implant-Less Rotator Cuff Repair Using "Arthrocuff" System

Rotator cuff tears remain one of the most common causes of shoulder pain and disability. Although many repair techniques like single-row, double-row, and transosseous equivalent repair have become popular, transosseous repair still remains the gold standard. Arthroscopic transosseous repair is a safe and affordable alternative to suture anchors. Considering this fact, a reusable instrumentation "ArthroCuff^", was developed by SpowerN Medical Equipment (Chennai, India) in collaboration with the National Hub for Healthcare Device Development, India. Arthrocuff system not only aids a robust transosseous rotator cuff repair, but it is also cost-effective. We present the video technique of Arthrocuff for rotator cuff repair.

Comparative efficacy of 5 suture configurations for arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff tear is one of the most common complaint with shoulder pain, disability, or dysfunction. So far, different arthroscopic techniques including single row (SR), double row (DR), modified Mason-Allen (MMA), suture bridge (SB) and transosseous (TO) have been identified to repair rotator cuff. However, no study has reported the comparative efficacy of these 5 suture configurations. The overall aim of this network meta-analysis was to analyze the clinical outcomes and healing rate with arthroscopy among SR, DR, MMA, SB and TO.

METHODS

A systematic literature was searched from PubMed, EBSCO-MEDLINE, Web of Science, google scholar and www.dayi100.com , and checked for the inclusion and exclusion standards. The network meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 and SATA 15.0 software.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies were eligible for inclusion, including 15 randomized controlled trials, 17 retrospective and 2 prospective cohort studies, with total 3250 shoulders. Two individual reviewers evaluated the quality of the 34 studies, the score form 5 and 9 of 10 were attained according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for the 17 retrospective and 2 prospective studies. There was no significant distinction for the Constant score among 5 groups in the 16 studies with 1381 shoulders. The treatment strategies were ranked as MMA, DR, SB, SR and TO. In ASES score, 14 studies included 1464 shoulders showed that no significant differences was showed among all 5 groups after surgery. Whereas the efficacy probability was TO, MMA, DR, SB and SR according to the cumulative ranking curve. The healing rate in 25 studies include 2023 shoulders was significant in both SR versus DR [risk ratio 0.45 with 95% credible interval (0.31, 0.65)], and SR versus SB [risk ratio 0.45 (95% credible interval 0.29, 0.69)], and no significant in the other comparison, the ranking probability was MMA, SB, DR, TO and SR.

CONCLUSION

Based on the clinical results, this network meta-analysis revealed that these 5 suture configurations shows no significant difference. Meanwhile, suture bridge may be the optimum treatment strategy which may improve the healing rate postoperatively, whereas the DR is a suboptimal option for arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs.

Functional outcomes of arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair using a 2-mm tape suture in a 137-patient cohort

Background

Although being the historical gold standard for rotator cuff repair, open transosseous (TO) repair was largely replaced by anchor-based methods with the advent of arthroscopic surgery owing to their comparative ease of use. However, suture anchors are at risk of dislodgement, especially among older patients, who have more osteopenic bone or those presenting large tears. Considering the ever-increasing active life expectancy and associated increased quality of life expectations by older generations, the need to offer safe and efficient surgical treatments to these patients imposes itself. Arthroscopic TO repairs would combine the best of both worlds and be well adapted to these populations. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome and complication rate of the TO arthroscopic repair technique when using a 2-mm braided suture tape. The secondary objective of this study was to assess functional outcome of TO repair in older patients and patients with >3-cm tears.

Methods

One hundred thirty-seven consecutive patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tear who underwent arthroscopic TO (anchorless) rotator cuff repair between January 2011 and December 2013 were reviewed. The surgery was performed by a single surgeon with a reusable curved suture passer and 2-mm braided tape suture. Follow-up was 3 to 5 years (mean = 50 months). All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative functional assessments (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Quick Dash) and were questioned with their overall satisfaction.

Results

Thirty-eight (28%) of the 137 patients were 65 years and older, and 62 (45%) had a large or massive tear. One patient (0.7%) had early retear at the suture-tendon interface after trauma 3 weeks postoperatively. The average Quick Dash score improved by 55.6 points and the average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved by 69.7 points 3.5 and 6.3 times their minimal clinically important differences, respectively. There was no significant difference in final functional outcomes between patients 65 years and older and younger patients or between patients with large and massive (>3 cm) and smaller tears (≤3 cm). Mean operative time was 68 min ± 16.

Conclusions

Arthroscopic TO repair using a 2-mm tape material has achieved significant mid-term functional improvement, with results statistically unaffected by larger tear size (>3 cm) or older age (≥65 years).

A Novel Arthroscopic Transosseous Procedure for Rotator Cuff Repair: An Economical Freehand Method

Open transosseous repair was historically considered the gold-standard surgical solution for rotator cuff tears; however, with advancements in arthroscopic surgery, this procedure was largely replaced by anchor-based techniques. Yet, the ability of anchor-based techniques to achieve similar biomechanical fixation remains uncertain.In this article, we describe a reproducible, economical, arthroscopic anchorless transosseous rotator cuff repair technique that uses an Omega configuration. This technique involves two bone tunnels and four high-strength polyethylene sutures and is suitable for medium-to-large rotator cuff tears that would alternatively need multiple anchors. This procedure not only maximizes the tendon-footprint contact area without using any implanted device but also theoretically lowers the bone laceration rate and is cost effective. In the current Technical Note, the procedure is described in detail along with several tips and tricks.

CLASSIFICATIONS

Level I, shoulder; Level II, rotator cuff.

Needle-Based Arthroscopic Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair: A Short-Term Outcomes Analysis

Introduction Given the limitations of anchor-based rotator cuff repair, surgeons have considered and investigated the use of an arthroscopic transosseous repair technique using only sutures to repair tendon tissue. Returning full circle to the gold standard of transosseous repair, but with the modern adaptation of arthroscopy, advocates of arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair believe that many of the risks associated with suture anchors can be avoided. The purpose of this study was to examine the capabilities of a novel needle-based arthroscopic transosseous tunneling device (OmniCuff™ arthroscopic transosseous device, MinInvasive Ltd., Magal, Israel) and evaluate the short-term clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction of patients treated with this technique. Materials and methods This study was a prospective, single-arm, multi-center study performed on patients from January 2014 to March 2015. During the study period, thirty-two patients underwent arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair using the OmniCuff™ arthroscopic transosseous device. Results The average age of patients was 58.2 years (range, 44 to 80 years). The sizes of the tears were as follows: seven small, 18 medium, four large, and three massive. The average number of tunnels used per repair was 1.9 with the following breakdown: six one-tunnel repairs, 22 two-tunnel repairs, and four three-tunnel repairs. The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score improved from 45.1 to 87.7, the mean Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score improved from 42.6 to 92. Overall patient satisfaction was high with an average Likert scale of 4.6. Conclusion Our study demonstrated significantly improved outcomes for patients undergoing arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair using the needle based Omnicuff device. Patients were overall very satisfied with the outcome of their surgery and their ASES and SST scores demonstrated this appropriately.

Editorial Commentary: Biology and Biomechanics Must Be Carefully Balanced for a Durable Rotator Cuff Repair

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair strategies have evolved over 3 decades, but suture anchor design, anchor configuration, and stitches have been largely driven by repair biomechanics. In recent years there has been a shift toward repair strategies that enhance the biology of tendon repair. Double-row and transosseous equivalent suture anchor repair constructs demonstrate excellent time zero mechanical properties, but the resulting increased repair tension and tendon compression may compromise tendon healing. Modern single-row repairs employing medialized triple-loaded suture anchors, simple stitches, and lateral marrow venting avoid some of the problems associated with double-row repairs and demonstrate excellent short-term healing and clinical results. The most robust repair fails if the tendon does not heal. Biology and biomechanics must be carefully balanced.

Arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair: how to avoid damaging the axillary nerve-a cadaveric study

INTRODUCTION

Arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair can be performed with an external guide, although the proximity to the axillary nerve raises safety concerns. The aim of this study is to determine the safety of different drilling angles regarding the axillary nerve.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a bone tunnel in the greater tuberosity in 17 fresh frozen shoulders, using an external guide at four different angles: 40°, 50°, 60°, and 70°. At each angle, we measured the distance between the drill and the axillary nerve, the distance from the acromion to the skin incision point, and the perimeter of the arm at the axilla.

RESULTS

The distance to the axillary nerve was safe with the guide at an angle of 40°, 50° and 60°, but not at 70° (p = 0.001). We found significant differences between all four angles (p < 0.05). Regression analysis demonstrated the influence of the guide angle in all measurements assessed (p < 0.001). There was no association between the measurements taken and the axillary perimeter (p > 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair with an external guide does not pose a risk for the axillary nerve using angles of 60° or less.

Clinical and functional outcomes of a novel transosseous device to treat rotator cuff tears: A minimum 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE

Despite the improvements in the repair equipment techniques of rotator cuff, a gold standard method has not been defined yet and transosseous fixation through deltoid-splitting (mini-open) approach is still regarded as a good option. The primary purpose of this study is to present satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes with a novel transosseous device in full-thickness rotator cuff tear through deltoid-splitting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was performed on 70 consecutive patients who underwent surgery by a single surgeon from June 2014 to June 2016 for a full-thickness rotator cuff tear and was managed with a novel transosseous device. Total number of patients, mean age, percentage of male and female patients, mean duration of follow-up, percentage of involvement of the dominant extremity, affected shoulder, and tear size were recorded. Functional and clinical outcomes were assessed baseline and postoperatively at 3 and 6 months and final follow-up using Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) and Constant-Murley scores.

RESULTS

A total of 70 (49 (70%) female, 21 (30%) male) patients whose mean age was 58.66 ± 9.19 (38-77) years were included. The mean surgery time was 35.33 ± 5.34 (28-55) min. The mean follow-up time was 28.31 ± 3.03 (24-36) months. According to the DeOrio and Cofield classification, 15 (21.43%) tears were small, 33 (47.14%) medium, 16 (22.86%) large, and 6 (8.57%) massive. By the final follow-up, the mean Constant-Murley score had significantly improved from 27.67 ± 7.46 (13-41) to 81.25 ± 3.77 (74-87; p = 0.0001) and the Q-DASH score had decreased from 82.34 ± 10.37 (65.91-100) to 10.28 ± 6.88 (0-23.45; p = 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the Constant-Murley or Q-DASH score at baseline-final follow-up between the small, medium, large, and massive tear groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tear using this novel transosseous device significantly improved functional and clinical scores. However, further long-term prospective randomized multicenter trials involving comparative studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Arthroscopic Transosseous Repair of Rotator Cuff Tear and Greater Tuberosity Cysts

Purpose

To evaluate the short-term outcomes of rotator cuff repair in the presence of a greater tuberosity cyst (GTC) using a transosseous repair technique.

Methods

This study included patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair with a transosseous technique and were evaluated clinically and by postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after 1 year. The inclusion criteria were based on the results of preoperative MRI and were as follows: patients identified as having a repairable full-thickness rotator cuff tear associated with the presence of cystic changes at the tendon insertion site of the greater tuberosity, defined as a GTC involving the footprint area of the torn tendon (supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendons).

Results

We evaluated 25 patients. The mean preoperative and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were 39.48 (P = .530) and 84.64 (P = .035), respectively; Constant shoulder scores, 38.96 (P < .005) and 80.28 (P = .425), respectively; and University of California–Los Angeles shoulder rating scale scores, 10.6 (P = .045) and 29.04 (P = .315), respectively. The GTC mapping system was easily adopted in all the MRI examinations independently from the quality of the images. The GTCs were mostly located in the superficial anterolateral section of the humeral head and in both the posterolateral sections (superficial and deep).

Conclusions

Arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair led to significant mid-term improvement and satisfactory subjective outcomes with low complication and failure rates in this study. The GTC mapping system could be useful to evaluate GTCs and to aid surgeons in the choice of the best surgical technique.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a transosseous knotless anchor (ATOK)

BACKGROUND

This article reviews the clinical and radiographic outcomes in a noninferiority trial use of a transosseous knotless anchor to perform arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs in a patient cohort that have an increased incidence of osteoporosis.

METHODS

Patients aged over 60 with a documented rotator cuff tear and who failed a rehab program underwent repair using an arthroscopic transosseous knotless (ATOK) anchor. Patients were prospectively reviewed using shoulder functional assessments (age-adjusted Constant score, Oxford Shoulder Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form [ASES], visual analog scale [VAS] pain scores), and underwent preoperative as well as 1-, 3-, and 12-month postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

15 patients had undergone rotator cuff repair using the ATOK and were followed for a minimum of 24 months (range 24-30 months). From preoperative to 24 months post repair, median scores improved for ASES (61-89), Oxford (26-44), Constant (62-91), and VAS Pain (5-0.5). Four patients developed a partial retear of their repair, but only 1 patient sustained a complete retear: Sugaya type I, 10; type II, 1; type III, 2; type IV, 1; and type V, 1. No anchors were displaced, and there were no osteolysis, neurologic, or technique-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs using a transosseous knotless technique has achieved a satisfactory outcome in this group of patients, who typically have poor bone quality, increasing the risk of antegrade anchor pullout. This approach would appear to combine the potential biomechanical and biological advantages of a transosseous repair technique, with the benefits of the lower morbidity arthroscopic surgical approach.

Arthroscopic, Needle-Based, Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair

Although open transosseous repair was historically used as a gold-standard surgical solution for rotator cuff tears, this procedure was largely replaced by anchor-based techniques because of the advancement of arthroscopic surgery. However, the ability of anchor-based repair to achieve similar biomechanical fixation remains uncertain. Despite the proposals of numerous methods over the last decade, there remains demand for a standard, reliable technique that integrates the biomechanical advantages of transosseous fixation within the realm of arthroscopy. We describe a technique for transosseous rotator cuff repair using the Omnicuff, a needle-based transosseous suture-passing device that minimizes the risk of failure of suture passage between the bone tunnels. With potential advantages of this design including automated-assisted suture passage, improved bone-tendon healing, and anchorless fixation, surgeons may be inclined to consider these biomechanical and cost-saving benefits. Future studies are warranted to determine clinical outcomes of this technique and its suitability for tears of varying degrees and patterns.

Biomechanical Strength of Rotator Cuff Repairs: A Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis of Cadaveric Studies

BACKGROUND

Biomechanical cadaveric studies of rotator cuff repair (RCR) have shown that transosseous equivalent and double-row anchored repairs are stronger than other repair constructs.

PURPOSE

To identify technical and procedural parameters that most reliably predict biomechanical performance of RCR constructs.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

The authors systematically searched the EMBASE and PubMed databases for biomechanical studies that measured RCR performance in cadaveric specimens. The authors performed a meta-regression on the pooled data set with study outcomes (gap formation, failure mode, and ultimate failure load) as dependent variables and procedural parameters (eg, construct type, number of suture limbs) as covariates. Stratification by covariates was performed. An alpha level of .05 was used.

RESULTS

Data from 40 eligible studies were included. Higher number of suture limbs correlated with higher ultimate failure load (β = 38 N per limb; 95% CI, 28 to 49 N) and less gap formation (β = -0.6 mm per limb; 95% CI, -1 to -0.2 mm). Other positive predictors of ultimate failure load were number of sutures, number of mattress stitches, and use of wide suture versus standard suture. When controlling for number of suture limbs, we found no significant differences among single-row anchored, double-row anchored, transosseous equivalent, and transosseous repairs. Higher number of suture limbs and transosseous equivalent repair both increased the probability of catastrophic construct failure.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the number of sutures, suture limbs, and mattress stitches in a RCR construct are stronger predictors of overall strength than is construct type. There is a need to balance increased construct strength with higher risk of type 2 failure.

Long-term results after arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiologic results after arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair (TORCR).

METHODS

A total of 69 patients with full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears with or without infraspinatus tendon tears treated with arthroscopic TORCR by a single surgeon between 1998 and 2003 were included. Among them, 56 patients (81%) with a mean age of 58 ± 5 years (range, 42-70 years) were available for final follow-up examination after an average of 15 ± 2 years (range, 12-18 years). The Subjective Shoulder Value, Constant score (CS), University of California at Los Angeles score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score were recorded. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to visualize tendon integrity in 66% of patients.

RESULTS

At final follow-up, the mean CS was 84 ± 8 points; mean University of California at Los Angeles score, 33 ± 2 points; mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 92 ± 10 points; and mean Subjective Shoulder Value, 89% ± 17%. MRI revealed asymptomatic repair failure in 9 patients (27%). Moreover, 4 patients (7%) underwent revision surgery because of a symptomatic rerupture, resulting in an overall retear rate of 33%. Patients with intact repairs at final follow-up showed a significantly higher CS (P = .019) and abduction strength (P = .016) than patients with retears.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic TORCR for the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears provided good clinical results 12 to 18 years after surgery. Cuff integrity on follow-up MRI scans had a positive effect on the clinical outcome.

Arthroscopic Transosseous Anchorless Rotator Cuff Repair Using the X-Box Technique

We describe a reproducible, step-by-step arthroscopic technique for anchorless transosseous rotator cuff repair using an X-box configuration with the Arthrotunneler device. The technique uses 2 bone tunnels and 4 high-strength sutures and is suitable for medium to large tears of the supra- and infraspinatus that would alternatively need a double-row repair with 4 anchors. Biomechanically, results appear to be similar as for anchored transosseous equivalent techniques. Enhanced biological healing and lower material costs are the possible benefits of this appealing arthroscopic approach that mimics the previous gold standard.

Optimal Angle of the Bone Tunnel for Avoiding Axillary Nerve Injuries During Arthroscopic Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Simulation Study

Background

Axillary nerve injury and suture cutout through the roof of the tunnel are potential complications of arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair (ATORCR).

Purpose

To determine a safe angle of drilling for the bone tunnel during ATORCR such that the axillary nerve is not at risk. The thickness of the bone bridge over the tunnel for different angles of drilling was also determined.

Study Design

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods

The drilling of a straight tunnel was simulated on 30 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in the oblique coronal plane by drawing a straight line that passed at a "safe distance" of 5 mm from the axillary nerve and emerging at the medial border of the insertion of the rotator cuff on the greater tuberosity. The angle made by this line with the horizontal axis of the humerus was measured on 3 MRI sections: anterior (passing just posterior to the lateral lip of the bicipital groove), middle (at the most lateral point of the proximal humerus), and posterior (an equal number of cuts away from the middle section as between anterior and middle). The thickness of the overlying bone roof was measured for this line as well as for simulation lines drawn at 50°, 55°, 60°, and 65° with the horizontal axis. A "safe limit," defined as the mean - 2SD, was also calculated.

Results

The axillary nerve was found to be safe, with a safety margin of 5 mm, at drill angles of less than 61.1° and 60.3° in the posterior and middle sections, respectively. The safe limit value for thickness of the overlying bone roof for the tunnel drilled at 60° was 5.0 mm in the posterior section (mean, 8.2 ± 0.3 mm) and 5.5 mm in the middle section (mean, 8.1 ± 0.2 mm). In the anterior section, the minimum safe angle was 57.7°, and the mean thickness of the bone roof for the 55° angle was 6.3 ± 0.2 mm (safe limit, 3.7 mm).

Conclusion

Straight bone tunnels in ATORCR surgery should be drilled at an angle of 60° to the horizontal axis of the humerus or 30° to the humeral shaft to ensure the safety of the axillary nerve while at the same time ensuring adequate thickness of the overlying bone roof. The anterior tunnel close to the bicipital groove should be drilled cautiously at 55° to the horizontal axis or 35° to the humeral shaft.

Clinical Relevance

The findings of the present study will help the surgeon choose the best angle for drilling tunnels during ATORCR surgery to avoid axillary nerve injuries as well as suture cut-through without the need for any proprietary device.

Is there a difference in clinical outcomes and repair integrity between arthroscopic single-row versus transosseous (anchorless) fixation? A retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated clinical and structural outcomes after transosseous (TO) repair. The purpose of this study was to compare structural and clinical outcomes of rotator cuff tear, repaired arthroscopically, with a single row (SR) or transossoeus (TO) anchorless technique.

METHODS

96 patients who underwent an arthroscopic repair for superior or posterosuperior rotator cuff tear using TO (n:54) or a SR (n:42) were retrospectively enrolled in this study after evaluation of clinical and surgical notes. Functional evaluation was performed with the adjusted Constant score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Postoperative cuff integrity was determined through MRI study.

RESULTS

Patients were recalled after a minimum follow-up of two years. All the patients were available for the study. In the SR group the Constant rating system showed a significant improvement from a preoperative average rating of 44.8 to an average of 85.7. In the group of TO repair the Constant rating system showed a significant improvement from a preoperative average of 46.1 to an average of 87.6 postoperatively. According to ASES index scores, the average total score improved from 42.8 to 92.0 in the anchor group and from 40.4 to 94.6 in the TO group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups about clinical outcomes. Postoperative MRI revealed no differences in term of complete re-tears between the two techniques. In the SR group at MRI we observe significant more cases of rotator cuff with a Sugaya type III healing.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair yielded successful clinical outcomes using SR and TO technique. However using the TO technique we saw less type 3 Sugaya readings on MRI suggesting a possible benefit with TO repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

Retrospective study.

Rotator Cuff Repair Technique With Transosseous Knotless Anchor System

Various surgical techniques exist for rotator cuff repair that provide a suitable environment for tendon-bone healing. Arthroscopic recreation of transosseous repairs, which had previously been performed by open or miniopen techniques, can now be performed; however, arthroscopic, transosseous passage of suture material can be challenging technically. There are potential biologic and cost-saving advantages of arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair that make an efficient and reproducible technique desirable for arthroscopists. The technique for arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair using a knotless anchor-based system is demonstrated in the current Technical Note. Potential advantages of this construct include excellent biomechanics, enhanced footprint vascularization, and utility in poor bone quality while using minimal anchor numbers. Further studies will be needed to elucidate healing rates and clinical outcomes.

Functional and Radiographic Outcomes After Arthroscopic Transosseous Suture Repair of Medium Sized Rotator Cuff Tears

PURPOSE

To evaluate the functional and anatomical outcomes after arthroscopic transosseous suture (TOS) repair of 2 to 4 cm sized rotator cuff tears and to identify preoperative factors influencing repair failure.

METHODS

From May 2013 to August 2014, patients with symptomatic 2 to 4 cm full-thickness tears underwent arthroscopic TOS repair, and those who could be followed up for a minimum of 2 years were included in this retrospective study. Functional and anatomical outcomes were analyzed up to 2 years postoperatively. Factors affecting cuff repair failure were evaluated, using both univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were included. On preoperative magnetic resonance imaging data, the mean anteroposterior dimension tear size was 27.0 ± 3.3 mm and mean retraction was 30.7 ± 3.1 mm. Anatomic failure (Sugaya III, IV, and V) rate was 33% with arthroscopic TOS repair; however, significant improvements were found regardless of cuff healing. Mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (range, 0-100) improved from 48.8 ± 16.6 preoperatively to 80.1 ± 11.1 postoperatively (P < .001), mean Constant score (range, 0-100) improved from 54.5 ± 11.8 to 73.7 ± 8.5 (P < .001), and mean pain visual analog scale score (range, 0-10) improved from 3.9 ± 1.7 to 2.0 ± 1.1 (P < .001). These changes reached each minimal clinically important difference previously reported. Greater tear size in anteroposterior dimension (P = .034), decreased acromiohumeral distance (P = .022), and higher fatty infiltration of supraspinatus (P = .011) were independent preoperative factors associated with repair failure. Twelve patients (44%) experienced intraoperative bone laceration.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic TOS repair was a reliable technique for patients with 2 to 4 cm size rotator cuff tear. Preoperative factors associated with cuff repair failure were greater tear size in anteroposterior dimension, decreased acromiohumeral distance, and higher fatty infiltration of supraspinatus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Advantages of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With a Transosseous Suture Technique: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff tear is a common finding in patients with painful, poorly functioning shoulders. The surgical management of this disorder has improved greatly and can now be fully arthroscopic.

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical and radiological results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using 2 different techniques: single-row anchor fixation versus transosseous hardware-free suture repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with rotator cuff tears were enrolled: 35 patients were operated with metal anchors and 34 with standardized transosseous repair. The patients were clinically evaluated before surgery, during the 28 days after surgery, and at least 1 year after the operation by the use of validated rating scores (Constant score, QuickDASH, and numerical rating scale [NRS]). Final follow-up was obtained at more than 3 years by a QuickDASH evaluation to detect any difference from the previous follow-up. During the follow-up, rotator cuff integrity was determined through magnetic resonance imaging and was classified according to the 5 Sugaya categories.

RESULTS

Patients operated with the transosseous technique had significantly less pain, especially from the 15th postoperative day: In the third week, the mean NRS value for the anchor group was 3.00 while that for transosseous group was 2.46 ( P = .02); in the fourth week, the values were 2.44 and 1.76, respectively ( P < .01). No differences in functional outcome were noted between the 2 groups at the final evaluation. In the evaluation of rotator cuff repair integrity, based on Sugaya magnetic resonance imaging classification, no significant difference was found between the 2 techniques in terms of retear rate ( P = .81).

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were found between the 2 arthroscopic repair techniques in terms of functional and radiological results. However, postoperative pain decreased more quickly after the transosseous procedure, which therefore emerges as a possible improvement in the surgical repair of the rotator cuff. Registration: NCT01815177 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).