The Nirschl procedure versus arthroscopic extensor carpi radialis brevis débridement for lateral epicondylitis

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Different Surgical Approaches for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is one of the most common causes of lateral elbow pain. When nonoperative treatment fails, 1 of the 3 surgical approaches-open, percutaneous, or arthroscopic-is used. However, determining which approach has the superior clinical outcome remains controversial.

Purpose

To review the outcomes of different operative modalities for LE qualitatively and quantitatively.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

This review was performed and reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies published in PubMed, Medline (via EBSCO), and ScienceDirect databases that treated LE with open, percutaneous, or arthroscopic approaches with at least 12 months of follow-up were included. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score. The primary outcome was the success rate of each operative treatment approach-open, percutaneous, and arthroscopic.

Results

From an initial search result of 603 studies, 43 studies (n = 1941 elbows) were ultimately included. The arthroscopic approach had the highest success rate (91.9% [95% CI, 89.2%-94.7%]) compared with the percutaneous (91% [95% CI, 87.3%-94.6%]) and open (82.7% [95% CI, 75.6%-89.8%]) approaches for LE surgery with changes in the mean visual analog scale pain score of 5.54, 4.90, and 3.63, respectively. According to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, the functional outcome improved in the arthroscopic group (from 54.11 to 15.47), the percutaneous group (from 44.90 to 10.47), and the open group (from 53.55 to 16.13). The overall improvement was also found in the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the arthroscopic group (from 55.12 to 90.97), the percutaneous group (from 56.31 to 87.65), and the open group (from 64 to 93.37).

Conclusion

Arthroscopic surgery had the highest rate of success and the best improvement in functional outcomes among the 3 approaches of LE surgery.

Failed surgical treatment for lateral epicondylitis: literature review and treatment considerations for successful outcomes

Background

Lateral epicondylitis is a common cause of elbow pain in the general population. It is recognized as a degenerative tendinopathy of the common extensor origin believed to be multifactorial, involving elements of repetitive microtrauma associated with certain physiologic and anatomic risk factors.

Methods

Initial treatment typically involves a combination of conservative treatment measures, with up to 90% success at 12-18 months. Surgical treatment is reserved for recalcitrant disease; traditionally involving open surgical débridement of the common extensor origin with reported success rates greater than 90%.

Results

Failure of surgical treatment can be multifactorial and present a challenge in determining the optimum management. Residual symptoms may be due to an incorrect initial diagnosis, inadequate surgical débridement, new pathology as a complication of the initial surgery and/or other patient-related and physician- related factors. Even more of a challenge is the possibility that etiology can be due to a combination of listed factors.

Discussion

In this review, we review the classification scheme for evaluating failed surgical treatment of LE first proposed by Morrey and expand on this classification system based on the senior author's experience. We present the senior author's preferred systematic approach to evaluation and management of these patients, as well as a salvage surgery technique used by the senior author to address the most common etiologies of surgical failure in these patients.

[Epicondylosis : Open surgical procedure-when and how for lateral and medial epicondylitis?]

BACKGROUND

Epicondylosis of the elbow are common pathologies, with a higher incidence for radial epicondylosis. Approximately 90% are self-limiting under conservative treatment.

TREATMENT

Multiple surgical procedures exist for the treatment of refractory cases. Arthroscopic treatment has been described for both radial and medial pathologies. Open and arthroscopic procedures show equivalent results in the surgical treatment of radial epicondylosis. This paper describes the most common open surgical procedures for the treatment of radial epicondylosis. Furthermore, the pros and cons of the arthroscopic versus the open approach are discussed, and the indications for an open surgical procedure for radial pathologies are highlighted. The authors believe that the open technique represents the standard treatment in the surgical treatment of ulnar epicondylosis.

LIMITATIONS

Arthroscopic procedures have been described, but studies comparing the clinical outcome versus open surgical treatment are lacking. The anatomic proximity of the flexor origin to the ulnar nerve with the risk of iatrogenic damage is another limiting factor. In addition, concomitant pathologies on the ulnar side can better be ruled out preoperatively, so that arthroscopy has a rather low significance in the treatment of ulnar epicondylosis.

[Arthroscopic debridement of the extensor carpi radialis brevis]

Surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis is reserved for patients who, despite extensive conservative therapy, do not experience satisfactory relief of symptoms. As an alternative to the open procedure, arthroscopic debridement of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) muscle is a simple and standardized procedure. The arthroscopic approach also enables the additional treatment of intra-articular pathologies such as loose bodies or osteochondral lesions. After diagnostic arthroscopy, the attachment of the ECRB is visualized via the anteromedial portal, so that under visual control the debridement of the tendon fibers of the ECRB and its bony insertion site can be performed via the anterolateral portal. Postoperatively, there is no restriction of movement of the elbow joint. The outcome after arthroscopic ECRB debridement described in the literature is equivalent to that of other surgical techniques.

Functional recovery in the surgical treatment of tennis elbow: side-to-side vs. tendon-to-bone attachment using a knotless suture anchor: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow sometimes does not respond to conservative treatment and requires surgical intervention. Many different surgical techniques have been described. The aim of this randomized study was to compare functional outcomes of open side-to-side suturing of the tendon and tendon-to-bone fixation with a knotless suture anchor.

METHODS

In total, 68 patients were included (4 were lost to follow-up) and were randomized into either the side-to-side tendon group or the suture anchor group. Demographic data consisted of age, sex, body mass index, affected arm, dominant arm, previous treatments, and symptom duration. Professional and sports activities were noted. Preoperative values of the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) score were noted. Clinical features consisted of range of motion in flexion and extension, grip strength, and wrist flexion and extension strength. All measurements were noted at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

The MEPI and NRS scores did not differ between the 2 groups, but there was a significant improvement in the MEPI score at 6 weeks vs. preoperatively in both the suture group (from 70.6 to 87.4) and the anchor group (from 68 to 86.5). The NRS scores showed no difference at each time point in both groups. The QuickDASH and QuickDASH-Sport scores showed a faster improvement between 6 weeks and 3 months in the anchor group compared with the suture group. Grip and extension strength also showed a slightly faster improvement at 6 weeks postoperatively in the anchor group. No significant difference in the number of weeks required to return to work was found between the groups (10.4 weeks in both groups).

CONCLUSION

Our results of side-to-side tendon repair compared with bone-tendon interface restoration by a suture anchor showed no significant differences in functional outcomes. Patients who received a suture anchor did have faster rehabilitation at 6 weeks postoperatively in terms of both functional outcome scores and grip and wrist extension strength measures.

Complications of Elbow Arthroscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Elbow arthroscopic surgery has been popularized and has made significant progress during the past 3 decades. The elbow joint is relatively small and is in close proximity to many neurovascular structures. These factors make elbow arthroscopic surgery technically demanding and liable to complications.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the rate of complications after elbow arthroscopic surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed to perform this systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to July 2021. All clinical studies that reported complications after elbow arthroscopic surgery were included; a total of 1208 articles were initially found. Case reports, reviews, abstracts, imaging studies, technique studies, nonclinical studies, and those not reporting postoperative complications were excluded. Complication rates were pooled across studies and reported as percentages. Complications were expressed as weighted proportions with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

A total of 95 studies (14,289 elbows) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall weighted complication rate was 11.0% (95% CI, 8.8%-13.5%), with postoperative stiffness being the most commonly encountered complication (4.5% [95% CI, 2.1%-7.6%]; 158/8818 procedures). The second most encountered complication was the need for subsequent surgery with a weighted proportion of 4.1% (95% CI, 2.9%-5.6%; 177/8853 procedures) followed by nerve injury with a weighted proportion of 3.4% (95% CI, 2.6%-4.3%; 267/13,725 procedures). The ulnar nerve was the most commonly injured nerve (2.6% [95% CI, 1.9%-3.4%]; 123/6290 procedures).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed that elbow arthroscopic surgery is a relatively safe procedure with low complication rates.

Arthroscopic Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis Tenotomy and Debridement Versus Debridement Alone for Refractory Lateral Epicondylitis: Clinical and MRI Evaluation

Background:

Arthroscopic debridement of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) tendon is a widely accepted procedure used in refractory lateral epicondylitis. However, residual pain occurs in some patients.

Purpose:

To investigate the clinical effectiveness of arthroscopic extended debridement (ECRB tenotomy and debridement) in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Patients with refractory lateral epicondylitis were consecutively recruited for this study. They underwent traditional ECRB debridement (control group) or extended ECRB debridement (ED group) under arthroscopy. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) were used to compare elbow function between the groups at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was also performed to evaluate pathology at 12 months.

Results:

A total of 69 patients participated in the study (33 patients in the ED group and 36 in the control group). After surgery, all patients showed improvement on all 3 outcome scores. Compared with the control group, the ED group had significantly better postoperative MEPS and VAS scores at 3 months (P ≤ .001 for both) and 6 months (P ≤ .03 for both) but similar values at 12 months. DASH scores between groups were similar at all time periods. At the 12-month follow-up, no patients in the ED group reported pain with strenuous work. Return-to-work (RTW) times were also shorter in the ED group compared with the controls (8 ± 4 vs 18 ± 8 weeks; P < .001). Postoperative MRI assessments revealed no high signal intensities on the lateral epicondyle in the ED group, while there was an increased internal signal intensity on the lateral epicondyle in 83% of the controls.

Conclusion:

Collectively, the extended ECRB debridement technique resulted in enhanced pain relief in the early postoperative period as well as providing faster RTW times compared with the traditional debridement technique. At 1 year follow-up, there were no differences in outcome measures between groups, but residual abnormal MRI findings were more common in the traditional debridement group.

Outcomes of Continued Intensive Conservative Treatment Versus Arthroscopic Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis Release for Recalcitrant Lateral Epicondylitis: A Non-randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

There is no consensus on treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis (RLE). This is a prospective, non-randomized, interventional study comparing pain scores and functional outcomes between arthroscopic extensor carpi radialis brevis release and continued intensive conservative treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study compared two groups: Group 1, consisting of 25 patients undergoing continued conservative treatment for 24 months, and Group 2, consisting of 25 patients undergoing arthroscopic extensor carpi radialis brevis release with decortication (ARD). VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) score for lateral elbow pain at rest and after routine daily activities were compared at 6 weeks, 24 weeks, 12 months and 24 months. Functional outcomes were compared with grip strength, and patients reported functional outcome scores, pre-intervention and 24 months post-intervention.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in VAS scores for pain, functional outcome scores, and grip strength in both the groups post-intervention (P < 0.05). VAS scores for pain at rest in both the groups were significantly better after the interventions, at all follow-up durations (P < 0.001). VAS scores for pain after routine daily activities were significantly better in group 2 at 24 weeks (P = 0.002) and afterward (P < 0.001). Group 2 had significantly better functional outcome scores at 24 months (P < 0.001) though the difference in grip strength was not statistically significant (P = 0.121).

CONCLUSION

The present study shows favourable functional outcomes and pain scores of ARD compared to continued intensive conservative treatment for RLE.

LEVEL OF STUDY

II, Non-randomized comparative study.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-022-00649-w.

Tenodesis with bone marrow venting under local anesthesia for recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis: Results of 2 years of follow-up

Hypothesis

We hypothesized that the treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis requires accurate identification of the painful area to promote remodeling of the degenerated extensor insertion and to stabilize the tendon origin during tendon healing. Thus, we performed tenodesis with bone marrow venting under local anesthesia for recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis.

Methods

Twenty patients (21 elbows) were treated with bone marrow venting at the painful area of the lateral epicondyle of the elbow and tenodesis using 2 soft anchors lateral to the capitellum (immediately distal to the painful area) and were followed up for ≥2 years. Patients were assessed using the numerical rating scale for pain and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, and objective evaluation included active range of motion.

Results

The mean preoperative and postoperative pain scores were 7.5 and 0.5, respectively, indicating significant pain relief (P < .001). The mean preoperative and postoperative Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire scores were 44.2 and 1.0, respectively (P < .001). Two elbows had a slightly positive Thomsen test at the final visit. No recurrence of intra-articular symptoms induced by synovial fringe impingement was observed. Patients experienced more pain at the bone-tendon junction of extensors than at the tendon parenchyma.

Conclusion

Tenodesis with bone marrow venting under local anesthesia was effective for subjective patient satisfaction and positive clinical outcomes at ≥2 years of follow-up in patients with recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis. Intra-articular symptoms can be improved by stabilization of the lateral soft tissue without treatment for intra-articular lesions.

Hand-Grip Strength and Return to Heavy Manual Work at a Mean 5-Year Follow-up After Arthroscopic Release of Recalcitrant Lateral Epicondylitis

Background:

Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow is a common degenerative disorder in middle-aged patients. Surgery is reserved for patients who do not respond to nonoperative treatment.

Purpose:

To evaluate hand-grip strength and return to heavy manual activities in patients engaged in work requiring heavy lifting after arthroscopic release of refractory lateral epicondylitis.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

The study included consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic release of the extensor carpi radialis brevis tendon to treat recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis of the elbow, with a minimum 48-month follow-up. Functional outcome measures included assessment of hand-grip strength, visual analog scale for pain, and Mayo elbow performance score. The recorded measurements were compared at postoperative 1 and 6 months and the final assessment. Pre- and postoperative data were compared using the paired t test, and the various postoperative assessments were compared using 1-way analysis of variance.

Results:

A total of 22 patients (mean ± SD; age, 34.6 ± 5.9 years) with a mean follow-up of 60.5 ± 4.7 months were included in our study. There were highly significant improvements between preoperative and 1-month postoperative results regarding hand-grip strength (17.5 ± 4.1 kg to 34.4 ± 6.8 kg), visual analog scale score for pain (7.86 ± 1.2 to 1.8 ± 1.09), and Mayo score (57.1 ± 7.9 to 89.3 ± 4.9; P < .00001 for all). Significant improvements were found on all 3 functional measures between 1 and 6 months postoperatively (P ≤ .05 was statistically significant), and there were nonsignificant improvements on all measures from 6-month to final follow-up. The patients regained 96.4% of their hand strength as compared with the unaffected side and returned to their previous activities without reporting serious complications.

Conclusion:

Minimally invasive arthroscopic release of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis of the elbow provided a satisfactory functional result, as shown by regaining of hand-grip strength in patients engaged in heavy manual occupations without significant morbidities.

Platelet-rich plasma injection vs. operative treatment for lateral elbow tendinosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although surgical treatment is considered reliable for lateral elbow tendinosis, local injection therapy may be preferable, as it avoids surgery. Among a number of local injections, platelet-rich plasma has been used successfully to treat lateral elbow tendinosis. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes in patients treated with either platelet-rich plasma injections or surgery for lateral elbow tendinosis using a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies published before March 1, 2021, that compared platelet-rich plasma with operative treatment for lateral elbow tendinosis. The pooled analysis was designed to compare the visual analog scale scores and the Patient-Related Tennis Elbow Evaluation scores between the platelet-rich plasma and surgical treatment groups at serial time points.

RESULTS

We included 5 studies involving 340 patients with lateral elbow tendinosis, comprising of 154 patients treated with platelet-rich plasma and 186 patients who underwent surgical treatment. The pooled analysis showed no statistically significant differences in the visual analog scale scores at any of the follow-up time points, namely, 2 months (mean difference [MD] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.51 to 4.74, P = .55, I² = 94%), 6 months (MD 0.80, 95% CI -2.83 to 4.42, P = .67, I² = 92%), and 12 months (MD -0.92, 95% CI -4.63 to 2.80, P = .63, I² = 93%) postintervention and in the Patient-Related Tennis Elbow Evaluation scores at 12 weeks (MD -1.86, 95% CI -22.30 to 18.58, P = .86, I² = 81%), 24 weeks (MD -3.33, 95% CI -21.82 to 15.17, P = .72, I² = 74%), and 52 weeks (MD -3.64, 95% CI -19.65 to 12.37, P = .66, I² = 69%) postintervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Local platelet-rich plasma injections and surgical treatment produced equivalent pain scores and functional outcomes in patients with lateral elbow tendinosis. Thus, platelet-rich plasma injections may represent a reasonable alternative treatment for patients who are apprehensive to proceed with surgery or for poor surgical candidates.

Open Versus Arthroscopic Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis and Worker's Compensation

Purpose

To compare the short-term outcomes between arthroscopic and open procedures for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Because a significant portion of patients have worker’s compensation (WC), the outcomes in these subgroups were separately analyzed.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients who had surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis by a single surgeon from 2010 to 2017 was performed. Patients who were symptomatic after 9 months of conservative treatments including nonsteroidal medications, steroid injections, and physical therapy were offered surgical intervention. The type of surgery was selected after detailed consultation with the patient. Charts were reviewed for preoperative pain, grip strength as measured by dynamometer, smoking status, and WC status. Postoperative assessments included pain and grip strength at 6 weeks and time taken to return to full duty. Two groups were compared using unpaired t test and chi-squared tests. Results were compared with similar studies in the literature.

Results

The study included 30 patients in the arthroscopic debridement group and 42 patients in the open tenotomy and reinsertion group. Eighteen patients (25%) had WC. Compared with the open group, the arthroscopic group had earlier return to full duty (mean 7.13 weeks, confidence interval [CI] 6.21 to 8.05 versu mean of 12.22 weeks, CI 11.21 to 13.24; P < .001) and less time for complete pain relief (mean 7.4 weeks, CI 7.02 to 7.93 versus 9.5 , CI 8.68 to 10.44; P = .043). No difference was seen among the groups in terms of unfavorable outcome (persistent pain and recurrence of pain), JAMAR hand dynamometer score at 6 weeks, and visual analog score at 6 weeks. A total of 11 patients (15%) had unfavorable outcome. Incidence of unfavorable outcomes was more in patients with WC insurance (36% in WC versus 7% in non-WC; P = .023). No association was seen with smoking status. WC patients also had a longer time to return to full duty (16.68 weeks for WC versus 7.65 weeks for non-WC; P < .001) and a longer time to get complete pain relief (12.4 weeks for WC versus 7.5 weeks for non-WC; P < .001).

Conclusion

The arthroscopic technique offers advantages of earlier return to work and shorter recovery period along with additional advantages of joint inspection and ability to treat coexisting pathologies. WC patients had a longer time to return to full duty and time for complete pain relief.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Arthroscopic Modified Bosworth Procedure for Refractory Lateral Elbow Pain With Radiocapitellar Joint Snapping

Background:

Radiocapitellar joint snapping due to the presence of synovial plica has been described as a contributory intra-articular pathology of lateral epicondylitis (LE).

Hypothesis:

The arthroscopic modified Bosworth technique can provide a safe and favorable outcome for refractory LE with radiocapitellar snapping.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Patients treated with the arthroscopic modified Bosworth procedure for refractory LE with radiocapitellar joint snapping were included in this study. The sequential surgical procedures included excision of the upper portion of the anterolateral annular ligament, removal of the synovial plicae, and release of the extensor carpi radialis brevis for all patients. Clinical outcomes were measured at a minimum 1-year follow-up.

Results:

A total of 22 patients with a mean ± SD age of 51.2 ± 10.4 years were included in this study. The mean follow-up was 29.4 ± 7.7 months (range, 21-42 months). The overall visual analog scale score (from preoperative to final follow-up) was 7.5 ± 1.2 vs 2.5 ± 1.8 (P < .001); flexion-extension motion arc was 133.8° ± 11.2° vs 146.4° ± 7.1° (P = .001); pronation-supination motion arc was 101.8° ± 9.2° vs 141.7° ± 10.2° (P = .001); Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 54.5 ± 13.2 vs 3.6 ± 4.1 (P < .001); and Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 51.9 ± 12.2 vs 84.3 ± 10.3 (P < .001).

Conclusion:

Radiocapitellar joint snapping may coexist with LE as a disease spectrum. The arthroscopic modified Bosworth technique provides safe and favorable outcomes for patients with refractory LE associated with radiocapitellar joint snapping.

Management of lateral epicondylitis

Lateral epicondylitis is the most common cause of lateral elbow pain. Although also known as tennis elbow, lateral epicondylitis often develops as a work-related condition and therefore constitutes a major public health issue. This article reviews the pathophysiological factors involved in lateral epicondylitis, as well as the tools available for establishing the diagnosis and ruling out other causes of lateral elbow pain. Finally, the non-operative and surgical treatment options are discussed in detail.

Current Trends for Treating Lateral Epicondylitis

Lateral epicondylitis, also known as 'tennis elbow', is a degenerative rather than inflammatory tendinopathy, causing chronic recalcitrant pain in elbow joints. Although most patients with lateral epicondylitis resolve spontaneously or with standard conservative management, few refractory lateral epicondylitis are candidates for alternative non-operative and operative modalities. Other than standard conservative treatments including rest, analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, orthosis and physical therapies, nonoperative treatments encompass interventional therapies include different types of injections, such as corticosteroid, lidocaine, autologous blood, platelet-rich plasma, and botulinum toxin, which are available for both short-term and long-term outcomes in pain resolution and functional improvement. In addition, newly emerging biologic enhancement products such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate and autologous tenocyte injectates are also under clinical use and investigations. Despite all non-operative therapeutic trials, persistent debilitating pain in patients with lateral epicondylitis for more than 6 months are candidates for surgical treatment, which include open, percutaneous, and arthroscopic approaches. This review addresses the current updates on emerging non-operative injection therapies as well as arthroscopic intervention in lateral epicondylitis.

Does use of the 70° arthroscope improve the outcomes of arthroscopic débridement for chronic recalcitrant tennis elbow?

BACKGROUND

The use of a 70° arthroscope has been reported to provide better visualization of the extensor carpi radialis brevis origin at the lateral epicondyle. We aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of arthroscopic débridement using an additional 70° arthroscope with those using a 30° arthroscope alone in the treatment of chronic recalcitrant tennis elbow.

METHODS

A total of 68 consecutive patients who received arthroscopic débridement for chronic recalcitrant tennis elbow were retrospectively reviewed. A 30° scope was used in 41 patients (mean age, 47 years; range, 26-61 years), whereas an additional 70° scope was used in 27 patients (mean age, 50 years; range, 34-61 years). Outcomes were assessed using a visual analog scale for pain and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire at the preoperative visit and at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 or more months after surgery.

RESULTS

Both groups showed significant and progressive improvements in visual analog scale pain scores and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores at 3 months, 6 months, and final follow-up (P < .05). However, no significant differences were found between the groups at all time points of measurement regarding those outcome measures (P > .05). In addition, the proportions of patients with excellent outcomes and those with clinically meaningful improvements were comparable between the groups (P = .397 and P = .558, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The use of an additional 70° arthroscope did not provide a significant improvement in the outcomes of arthroscopic débridement for chronic recalcitrant tennis elbow.

Imaging the Postsurgical Upper Limb: The Radiologist Perspective

Imaging has a paramount role in postsurgical assessment. Radiologists need to be familiar with the different surgical procedures to be able to identify expected postsurgical appearances and also detect potential complications. This article reviews the indications, normal expected postsurgical appearances, and complications of the most frequently used surgical procedures in the shoulder, elbow, and wrist. The emphasis is on points that should not be overlooked in the surgical planning.

Chronic lateral epicondylitis: challenges and solutions

Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is a significant source of pain and dysfunction resulting from repetitive gripping or wrist extension, radial deviation, and/or forearm supination. Although most cases are self-limiting over several years, controversy exists regarding the best treatment strategy for chronic LE. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), physical therapy (PT), shockwave therapy, and injections with corticosteroids or biologics are all conservative treatment options for LE. For refractory cases, surgical options include open, arthroscopic, and percutaneous techniques. In this review, the current evidence behind these treatment strategies is presented. The data demonstrate that NSAIDs, PT, bracing, and shockwave therapy provide limited benefit for treating LE. Biologics such as platelet-rich plasma and autologous whole-blood injections may be superior to steroid injections in the long-term management of LE. Although the initial results are promising, larger comparative studies on stem cell injections are needed. For refractory LE, open, arthroscopic, and percutaneous techniques are all highly effective, with no method seemingly superior over another. Arthroscopic and percutaneous approaches may result in faster recovery and earlier return to work.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection With Percutaneous Needling for Recalcitrant Lateral Epicondylitis: Comparison of Tenotomy and Fenestration Techniques

Background

Recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis (LE) is a common debilitating condition, with numerous treatment options of varying success. An injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been shown to improve LE, although it is unclear whether the method of needling used in conjunction with a PRP injection is of clinical importance.

Purpose

To determine whether percutaneous needle tenotomy is superior to percutaneous needle fenestration when each is combined with a PRP injection for the treatment of recalcitrant LE.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 93 patients with recalcitrant LE were treated with a PRP injection and percutaneous needle fenestration (n = 45) or percutaneous needle tenotomy (n = 48) over a 5-year study interval. Preoperative patient data, including visual analog scale for pain (VAS-P), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) scores and grip strength, were obtained from a chart review and compared with postoperative values obtained prospectively. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of complications, need for additional interventions, return to work, and patient satisfaction.

Results

At a mean follow-up of 40 months, significant improvements in VAS-P (mean, -6.1; 95% CI, -6.8 to -5.5; P < .0001), QuickDASH (mean, -46; 95% CI, -52 to -40; P < .0001), and PRTEE (mean, -57; 95% CI, -64 to -50; P < .0001) scores and grip strength (mean, +6.1 kg; 95% CI, 4.9 to 7.3; P < .0001) were observed across the entire study cohort, with no significant differences noted between the fenestration and tenotomy groups. Nine of 45 patients (22%) underwent additional procedures to treat recurrent symptoms in the fenestration group compared with 5 of 48 patients (10%) in the tenotomy group (P = .05). No complications occurred in any patients, and no patients expressed dissatisfaction with their treatment course.

Conclusion

A PRP injection with concomitant percutaneous needling is an effective treatment for recalcitrant LE, with sustained improvements in pain, strength, and function demonstrated at a mean follow-up of longer than 3 years. Although the method of concomitant needling does not appear to have a significant effect on treatment outcomes, more aggressive needle tenotomy is less likely to require conversion to open tenotomy than needle fenestration in the short term to midterm.