1
|
Schadow JE, Maxey D, Smith TO, Finnilä MAJ, Manske SL, Segal NA, Wong AKO, Davey RA, Turmezei T, Stok KS. Systematic review of computed tomography parameters used for the assessment of subchondral bone in osteoarthritis. Bone 2024; 178:116948. [PMID: 37926204 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review the published parameters for the assessment of subchondral bone in human osteoarthritis (OA) using computed tomography (CT) and gain an overview of current practices and standards. DESIGN A literature search of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases was performed with search strategies tailored to each database (search from 2010 to January 2023). The search results were screened independently by two reviewers against pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were deemed eligible if conducted in vivo/ex vivo in human adults (>18 years) using any type of CT to assess subchondral bone in OA. Extracted data from eligible studies were compiled in a qualitative summary and formal narrative synthesis. RESULTS This analysis included 202 studies. Four groups of CT modalities were identified to have been used for subchondral bone assessment in OA across nine anatomical locations. Subchondral bone parameters measuring similar features of OA were combined in six categories: (i) microstructure, (ii) bone adaptation, (iii) gross morphology (iv) mineralisation, (v) joint space, and (vi) mechanical properties. CONCLUSIONS Clinically meaningful parameter categories were identified as well as categories with the potential to become relevant in the clinical field. Furthermore, we stress the importance of quantification of parameters to improve their sensitivity and reliability for the evaluation of OA disease progression and the need for standardised measurement methods to improve their clinical value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jemima E Schadow
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - David Maxey
- Department of Radiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom.
| | - Toby O Smith
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, United Kingdom.
| | - Mikko A J Finnilä
- Research Unit of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
| | - Sarah L Manske
- Department of Radiology, McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| | - Neil A Segal
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, United States.
| | - Andy Kin On Wong
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Schroeder's Arthritis Institute, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Rachel A Davey
- Department of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Tom Turmezei
- Department of Radiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom; Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
| | - Kathryn S Stok
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Verhaegen F, Meynen A, Pitocchi J, Debeer P, Scheys L. Quantitative statistical shape model-based analysis of humeral head migration, Part 2: Shoulder osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res 2023; 41:21-31. [PMID: 35343599 DOI: 10.1002/jor.25335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
We wanted to investigate the quantitative characteristics of humeral head migration (HHM) in shoulder osteoarthritis (OA) and their possible associations with scapular morphology. We quantified CT-scan-based-HHM in 122 patients with a combination of automated 3D scapulohumeral migration (=HHM with respect to the scapula) and glenohumeral migration (=HHM with respect to the glenoid) measurements. We divided OA patients in Group 1 (without HHM), Group 2a (anterior HHM) and Group 2b (posterior HHM). We reconstructed and measured the prearthropathy scapular anatomy with a statistical shape model technique. HHM primarily occurs in the axial plane in shoulder OA. We found "not-perfect" correlation between subluxation distance AP and scapulohumeral migration values (rs = 0.8, p < 0.001). Group 2b patients had a more expressed prearthropathy glenoid retroversion (13° vs. 7°, p < 0.001) and posterior glenoid translation (4 mm vs. 6 mm, p = 0.003) in comparison to Group 1. Binary logistic regression analysis indicated prearthropathy glenoid version as a significant predictor of HHM (χ² = 27, p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the pathologic version could explain 56% of subluxation distance-AP variance and 75% of the scapulohumeral migration variance (all p < 0.001). Herewith, every degree increase in pathologic glenoid retroversion was associated with an increase of 1% subluxation distance-AP, and scapulohumeral migration. The occurrence of posterior HHM is associated with prearthropathy glenoid retroversion and more posterior glenoid translation. The reported regression values of HHM in the function of the pathologic glenoid version could form a basis toward a more patient-specific correction of HHM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filip Verhaegen
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Division of Orthopaedics, Institute for Orthopaedic Research and Training (IORT), University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alexander Meynen
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Division of Orthopaedics, Institute for Orthopaedic Research and Training (IORT), University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Philippe Debeer
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Division of Orthopaedics, Institute for Orthopaedic Research and Training (IORT), University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lennart Scheys
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Division of Orthopaedics, Institute for Orthopaedic Research and Training (IORT), University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Physiological Offset Parameters of the Adult Shoulder Joint-A MRI Study of 800 Patients. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12102507. [PMID: 36292196 PMCID: PMC9600260 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12102507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Humeral offset (HO) and glenoidal offset (GO) are important morphological parameters in diagnostics and therapy for shoulder pathologies. However, physiological reference values have not yet been sufficiently determined. The aim of the present study was to establish physiological reference values for shoulder offset parameters (SOPs). Methods: MRI images of the shoulder joints of 800 patients (mean age: 50.13 years [±16.01]) were analysed retrospectively. HO, GO, lateral glenoidal humeral offset (LGHO), humeral shaft axis offset (HAO) and cortical offset (CO) were measured. SOPs were examined for associations with age, gender, side and osteoarthritis. Results: The mean HO was 26.19 (±2.70), the mean GO was 61.79 (±5.67), the mean LGHO was 54.49 (±4.69), the mean HAO was 28.17 (±2.82) and the mean CO was 16.70 (±3.08). For all SOPs, significantly higher values were measured in male shoulders. There was a significantly (p < 0.001) higher mean value for HO, GO and LGHO in right shoulders. There was a significant correlation between age and LGHO, and HAO and CO, but not between age and HO or GO. Shoulders with osteoarthritis and non-osteoarthritis did not differ in the mean value of HO, GO, LGHO and HAO, except for CO (p = 0.049). Conclusion: Reference values for SOPs in the adult shoulder joint were determined for the first time. Significant gender-specific differences were found for all measured SOPs. In addition, it was seen that for some SOPs, the joint side and the patient’s age has to be taken into account in shoulder diagnostics and surgery.
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
» The term "subluxation" means partial separation of the joint surfaces. In the arthritic shoulder, "arthritic glenohumeral subluxation" refers to displacement of the humeral head on the surface of the glenoid. » The degree of arthritic glenohumeral subluxation can be measured using radiography with standardized axillary views or computed tomography (CT). » Shoulders with a type-B1 or B2 glenoid may show more posterior subluxation on an axillary radiograph that is made with the arm in an elevated position than on a CT scan that is made with the arm at the side. » The degree of arthritic glenohumeral subluxation is not closely related to glenoid retroversion. » The position of the humeral head with respect to the plane of the scapula is related to glenoid retroversion and is not a measure of glenohumeral subluxation. » Studies measuring glenohumeral subluxation before and after arthroplasty should clarify its importance to the clinical outcomes of shoulder reconstruction.
Collapse
|
5
|
Matache BA, Alnusif N, Chaoui J, Walch G, Athwal GS. Humeral head subluxation in Walch type B shoulders varies across imaging modalities. JSES Int 2021; 5:98-101. [PMID: 33554173 PMCID: PMC7846694 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Walch type B pattern of glenohumeral osteoarthritis is characterized by posterior humeral head subluxation (PHHS). At present, it is unknown whether the percentage of subluxation measured on axillary radiographs is consistent with measurements on 2-dimensional (2D) axial or 3-dimensional (3D) volumetric computed tomography (CT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate PHHS across imaging modalities (radiographs, 2D CT, and 3D CT). Methods A cohort of 30 patients with Walch type B shoulders underwent radiography and standardized CT scans. The cohort comprised 10 type B1, 10 type B2, and 10 type B3 glenoids. PHHS was measured using the scapulohumeral subluxation method on axillary radiographs and 2D CT. On 3D CT, PHHS was measured volumetrically. PHHS was statistically compared between imaging modalities, with P ≤ .05 considered significant. Results The mean PHHS value for the entire group was 69% ± 24% on radiographs, 65% ± 23% with 2D CT, and 74% ± 24% with 3D volumetric CT. PHHS as measured on complete axillary radiographs was not significantly different than that measured on 2D CT (P = .941). Additionally, PHHS on 3D volumetric CT was 9.5% greater than that on 2D CT (P < .001). There were no significant differences in PHHS between the type B1, B2, and B3 groups with 2D or 3D CT measurement techniques (P > .102). Conclusion Significant differences in PHHS were found between measurement techniques (P < .035). A 9.5% difference in PHHS between 2D and 3D CT can be mostly accounted for by the linear (2D) vs. volumetric (3D) measurement techniques (a linear 80% PHHS value is mathematically equivalent to a volumetric PHHS value of 89.6%). Surgeons should be aware that subluxation values and therefore thresholds vary across different imaging modalities and measurement techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Naser Alnusif
- Roth
- McFarlane Hand & Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Healthcare London, London, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - George S Athwal
- Roth
- McFarlane Hand & Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Healthcare London, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Preoperative assessment of the glenoid in the setting of shoulder arthroplasty is critical to account for variations in glenoid morphology, wear, version, inclination, and glenohumeral subluxation. Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) scan assessment of the morphology of glenoid erosion allows for a more accurate surgical decision-making process to correct deformity and restore the joint line. Newer technology has brought forth computer-assisted software for glenoid planning in shoulder arthroplasty and patient-specific instrumentation. There have been promising early findings, although further evaluation is needed to determine how this technology impacts implant survivorship, function, and patient-reported outcomes.
Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:126-137. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190011
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Gates
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shoulder Service, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Brain Sager
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shoulder Service, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Michael Khazzam
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shoulder Service, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prearthroplasty glenohumeral pathoanatomy and its relationship to patient's sex, age, diagnosis, and self-assessed shoulder comfort and function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28:2290-2300. [PMID: 31311749 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is great current interest in characterizing the prearthroplasty glenohumeral pathoanatomy because of its role in guiding surgical technique and its possible effects on arthroplasty outcome. METHODS We examined 544 patients within 6 weeks before arthroplasty with the goals of characterizing the following: demographic and radiographic characteristics; relationships of the radiographic pathoanatomy to the patient's age, sex, and diagnosis; inter-relationships among glenoid type, glenoid version, and amount of decentering of the humeral head on the glenoid; and relationships of the pathoanatomy to the patient's self-assessed comfort and function. RESULTS Male patients had a higher frequency of B2 glenoids and a lower frequency of A2 glenoids. The arthritic shoulders of men were more retroverted and had greater amounts of posterior decentering. Patients with types A1 and C glenoids were younger than those with other glenoid types. Shoulders with osteoarthritis were more likely to be type B2 and to be retroverted. Types B2 and C had the greatest degree of retroversion, whereas types B1 and B2 had the greatest amounts of posterior decentering. Shoulders with glenoid types B1 and B2 and those with more decentering did not have worse self-assessed shoulder comfort and function. CONCLUSIONS Glenohumeral pathoanatomy was found to have previously unreported relationships to the patient's sex, age, and diagnosis. Contrary to what might have been expected, more advanced glenohumeral pathoanatomy (ie, type B glenoids, greater retroversion, greater decentering) was not associated with worse self-assessed shoulder comfort and function.
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim JH, Min YK. Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Clin Shoulder Elb 2018; 21:186-191. [PMID: 33330175 PMCID: PMC7726408 DOI: 10.5397/cise.2018.21.4.186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2018] [Revised: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To determine the normal range of humeral head positioning on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods We selected normal subjects (64 patients; group A) to study the normal range of humeral head positioning on the glenoid by MRI measurements. To compare the MRI measurement method with the computed tomography (CT), we selected group B (70 patients) who underwent both MRI and CT. We measured the humeral-scapular alignment (HSA) and the humeral-glenoid alignment (HGA). Results The HSA in the control group was 1.47 ± 1.05 mm, and the HGA with and without reconstruction were 1.15 ± 0.65 mm and 1.03 ± 0.59 mm, respectively, on MRI. In the test group, HSA was 2.67 ± 1.47 mm and HGA with and without reconstruction was 1.58 ± 1.16 mm and 1.49 ± 1.08 mm, on MRI. On CT, the HSA was 1.72 ± 1.01 mm, and HGA with and without reconstruction were 1.54 ± 0.96 mm and 1.59 ± 0.93 mm, respectively. HSA was significantly different according to image modality (p=0.0006), but HGA was not significantly different regardless of reconstruction (p=0.8836 and 0.9234). Conclusions Although additional CT scans can be taken to measure decentering in patients with rotator cuff tears, reliable measurements can be obtained with MRI alone. When using MRI, it is better to use HGA, which is a more reliable measurement value based on the comparison with CT measurement (study design: Study of Diagnostic Test; Level of evidence II).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung-Han Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Young-Kyoung Min
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Walch B0 glenoid: pre-osteoarthritic posterior subluxation of the humeral head. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27:181-188. [PMID: 28965687 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Revised: 08/09/2017] [Accepted: 08/14/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The management of primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder has been well investigated. However, the etiology and management of posterior humeral head subluxation in the context of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis remain controversial. The finding of static posterior subluxation of the humeral head before the development of posterior bone erosion of the glenoid in young men with radiographic findings of primary osteoarthritis has been described as arthrogenic posterior subluxation of the humeral head. It demonstrates the earliest form of the osteoarthritic evolution, and an excessive glenoid retroversion is the only probable cause of this static subluxation, although this is controversial. The clinical relevance of these findings is important in allowing the identification of patients at risk for development of glenohumeral osteoarthritis and in developing an early treatment for the subluxation to try to alter the natural course of this disease. The aim of our summary paper was to review the current literature on this matter in an attempt to better understand the pathophysiologic mechanism of this condition, which we named pre-osteoarthritic posterior subluxation of the humeral head, or Walch B-zero (B0) glenoid. It appears that Walch B0 glenoid is a pathologic condition (initially dynamic, eventually evolving into a static condition) that may lead to posterior erosion of the glenoid, taking place once there is asymmetric increased posterior glenohumeral contact forces and possibly associated with increased glenoid retroversion.
Collapse
|