Influence of joint kinematics on polyethylene wear in anatomic shoulder joint arthroplasty

[Tribology in arthroplasty : Friction and wear, a key to a long lifetime]

This article is intended to highlight one of the key roles in endoprosthetic treatment with artificial implants and the extension of service life. Like every joint, artificial joints are subject to the physical laws of friction and wear-in short, tribology. Material pairings, surfaces and mechanisms of action in particular play a decisive role here. The special features and current findings relating to the three largest synovial joints (hip, knee and shoulder) will be discussed in detail and suggestions will be made for future developments. Continuous developments in the field of the tribology of artificial joints can massively improve care for patients. The revision figures and reasons already show the success of individual improvements in recent years.

Do total shoulder arthroplasty implants corrode?

BACKGROUND

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has become the gold-standard treatment to relieve joint pain and disability in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis who do not respond to conservative treatment. An adverse reaction to metal debris released due to fretting corrosion has been a major concern in total hip arthroplasty. To date, it is unclear how frequently implant corrosion occurs in TSA and whether it is a cause of implant failure. This study aimed to characterize and quantify corrosion and fretting damage in a single anatomic TSA design and to compare the outcomes to the established outcomes of total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

We analyzed 21 surgically retrieved anatomic TSAs of the same design (Tornier Aequalis Pressfit). The retrieved components were microscopically examined for taper corrosion, and taper damage was scored. Head and stem taper damage was quantitatively measured with a non-contact optical coordinate-measuring machine. In selected cases, damage was further characterized at high magnifications using scanning electron microscopy. Energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy and metallographic evaluations were performed to determine underlying alloy microstructure and composition. Comparisons between groups with different damage features were performed with independent-samples t tests; Mann-Whitney tests and multivariate linear regression were conducted to correlate damage with patient factors. The level of statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

The average material loss for head and stem tapers was 0.007 mm3 and 0.001 mm3, respectively. Material loss was not correlated with sex, age, previous implant, or time in situ (P > .05). We observed greater volume loss in head tapers compared with stem tapers (P = .002). Implants with evidence of column damage had larger volumetric material loss than those without such evidence (P = .003). Column damage aligned with segregation bands within the alloy (preferential corrosion sites). The average angular mismatch was 0.03° (standard deviation, 0.0668°), with negative values indicating distal engagement and positive values indicating proximal engagement. Implants with proximal engagement were significantly more likely to have column damage than those with distal engagement (P = .030).

DISCUSSION

This study has shown not only that the metal components of TSA implants can corrode but also that the risk of corrosion can be reduced by (1) eliminating preferential corrosion sites and (2) ensuring distal engagement to prevent fluid infiltration into the modular junction.

Reduced Revision Rates in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With Crosslinked Polyethylene: Results From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

BACKGROUND

Loss of glenoid fixation is a key factor affecting the survivorship of primary total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). It is not known whether the lower revision rates associated with crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) compared with those of non-XLPE identified in hip and knee arthroplasty apply to shoulder arthroplasty.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We used data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) to compare the revision rates of primary stemmed anatomic TSA using XLPE to procedures using non-XLPE. In patients receiving a primary stemmed anatomic TSA for osteoarthritis, we asked: (1) Does the rate of revision or reason for revision vary between XLPE and non-XLPE all-polyethylene glenoid components? (2) Is there any difference in the revision rate when XLPE is compared with non-XLPE across varying head sizes? (3) Is there any difference in survival among prosthesis combinations with all-polyethylene glenoid components when they are used with XLPE compared with non-XLPE?

METHODS

Data were extracted from the AOANJRR from April 16, 2004, to December 31, 2020. The AOANJRR collects data on more than 97% of joint replacements performed in Australia. The study population included all primary, stemmed, anatomic TSA procedures performed for osteoarthritis using all-polyethylene glenoid components. Procedures were grouped into XLPE and non-XLPE bearing surfaces for comparison. Of the 10,102 primary stemmed anatomic TSAs in the analysis, 39% (3942 of 10,102) used XLPE and 61% (6160 of 10,102) used non-XLPE. There were no differences in age, gender, or follow-up between groups. Revision rates were determined using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship to describe the time to the first revision, with censoring at the time of death or closure of the database at the time of analysis. Revision was defined as removal, replacement, or addition of any component of a joint replacement. The unadjusted cumulative percent revision after the primary arthroplasty (with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) was calculated and compared using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, gender, fixation, and surgeon volume. Further analyses were performed stratifying according to humeral head size, and a prosthesis-specific analysis adjusted for age and gender was also performed. This analysis was restricted to prosthesis combinations that were used at least 150 times, accounted for at least four revisions, had XLPE and non-XLPE options available, and had a minimum of 3 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Non - XLPE had a higher risk of revision than XLPE after 1.5 years (HR 2.3 [95% CI 1.6 to 3.1]; p < 0.001). The cumulative percent revision at 12 years was 5% (95% CI 4% to 6%) for XLPE and 9% (95% CI 8% to 10%) for non-XLPE. There was no difference in the rate of revision for head sizes smaller than 44 mm. Non-XLPE had a higher rate of revision than XLPE for head sizes 44 to 50 mm after 2 years (HR 2.3 [95% CI 1.5 to 3.6]; p < 0.001) and for heads larger than 50 mm for the entire period (HR 2.2 [95% CI 1.4 to 3.6]; p < 0.001). Two prosthesis combinations fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the prosthesis-specific analysis. One had a higher risk of revision when used with non-XLPE compared with XLPE after 1.5 years (HR 3.7 [95% CI 2.2 to 6.3]; p < 0.001). For the second prosthesis combination, no difference was found in the rate of revision between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

These AOANJRR data demonstrate that noncrosslinked, all-polyethylene glenoid components have a higher revision rate compared with crosslinked, all-polyethylene glenoid components when used in stemmed anatomic TSA for osteoarthritis. As polyethylene type is likely an important determinant of revision risk, crosslinked polyethylene should be used when available, particularly for head sizes larger than 44 mm. Further studies will need to be undertaken after larger numbers of shoulder arthroplasties have been performed to determine whether this reduction in revision risk associated with XLPE bears true for all TSA designs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Does Kinematic Alignment Increase Polyethylene Wear Compared With Mechanically Aligned Components? A Wear Simulation Study

BACKGROUND

Kinematic alignment is an alternative approach to mechanical alignment. Kinematic alignment can restore the joint line to its prearthritic condition, and its advocates have suggested it may be associated with other benefits. But this alignment approach often results in tibial components that are placed in varus and femoral components that are placed in valgus alignment, which may result in an increased risk of component loosening because of wear. Like malaligned implant components, kinematically aligned knee implants could increase wear in vivo, but we lack comparative data about wear behavior between these approaches.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Do the different alignment approaches (kinematic, mechanical, and purposefully malaligned components) result in different wear rates in a wear simulator? (2) Do the different alignment approaches lead to different worn areas on the polyethylene inserts in a wear simulator? (3) Do the different alignment approaches result in different joint kinematics in a wear simulator?

METHODS

Mechanical alignment was simulated in a force-controlled manner with a virtual ligament structure according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 14243-1) using a knee wear simulator. To simulate kinematic alignment, flexion-extension motion, internal-external torque, and the joint line were tilted by 4°, using a novel mechanical setup, without changing the force axis. The setup includes bearings with inclinations of 4° so that the joint axis of 4° is determined. To verify the angle of 4°, a digital spirit level was used. To simulate malalignment, we tilted the implant and, therefore, the joint axis by 4° using a wedge with an angle of 4° without tilting the torque axes of the simulator. This leads to a purposefully malaligned tibial varus and femoral valgus of 4°. For each condition, three cruciate-retaining knee implants were tested for 3.0 x 10 6 cycles, and one additional implant was used as soak control. Gravimetric wear analyses were performed every 0.5 x 10 6 cycles to determine the linear wear rate of each group by linear regression. The wear area was measured after 3.0 x 10 6 cycles by outlining the worn areas on the polyethylene inserts, then photographing the inserts and determining the worn areas using imaging software. The joint kinematics (AP translation and internal-external rotation) were recorded by the knee simulator software and analyzed during each of the six simulation intervals.

RESULTS

Comparing the wear rates of the different groups, no difference could be found between the mechanical alignment and the kinematic alignment (3.8 ± 0.5 mg/million cycles versus 4.1 ± 0.2 mg/million cycles; p > 0.99). However, there was a lower wear rate in the malaligned group (2.7 ± 0.2 mg/million cycles) than in the other two groups (p < 0.01). When comparing the total wear areas of the polyethylene inserts among the three different alignment groups, the lowest worn area could be found for the malaligned group (716 ± 19 mm 2 ; p ≤ 0.003), but there was no difference between kinematic alignment and mechanical alignment (823 ± 19 mm 2 versus 825 ± 26 mm 2 ; p > 0.99). Comparing the AP translation, no difference was found between the mechanical alignment, the kinematic alignment, and the malalignment group (6.6 ± 0.1 mm versus 6.9 ± 0.2 mm versus 6.8 ± 0.3 mm; p = 0.06). In addition, the internal-external rotation between mechanical alignment, kinematic alignment, and malalignment also revealed no difference (9.9° ± 0.4° versus 10.2° ± 0.1° versus 10.1° ± 0.6°; p = 0.44).

CONCLUSION

In the current wear simulation study, the wear rates of mechanical alignment and kinematic alignment of 4° were in a comparable range.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results suggest that kinematic alignment with up to 4° of component inclination may give the surgeon confidence that the reconstruction will have good wear-related performance when using a modern cruciate-retaining implant. The malaligned group had the lowest wear rate, which may be a function of the smaller worn area on the inserts compared with the other two alignment groups. This smaller articulation area between the femoral condyles and polyethylene insert could increase the risk of delamination of malaligned components over longer test durations and during high-load activities. For that reason, and because malalignment can cause nonwear-related revisions, malalignment should be avoided. Further in vitro and clinical studies must prove whether the wear simulation of different alignments can predict the wear behavior in vivo.

Targeting repeatability of a less obtrusive surgical navigation procedure for total shoulder arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Surgical navigation systems have demonstrated improvements in alignment accuracy in a number of arthroplasty procedures, but they have not yet been widely adopted for use in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We believe this is due in part to the obtrusiveness of conventional optical tracking systems, as well as the need for additional intraoperative steps such as calibration and registration. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of adapting a less-intrusive dental navigation system for use in TSA.

METHODS

We developed a proof-of-concept system based on validated laser-engraved surgical tools recently introduced for use in dental surgery that are calibrated once when manufactured and not recalibrated at time of use. The design also features a notably smaller bone-mounted tracker that can be tracked from a wide range of viewing angles. To assess our system's performance, we modified the dental surgical software to support guidance of a TSA procedure. We then conducted a user study in which three participants with varying surgical experience used the system to drill 30 holes in a glenoid model. Using a coordinate measuring machine, we determined the resulting drilled trajectory and compared this to the pre-planned trajectory. Since we used a model glenoid rather than anatomical specimens, we report on targeting precision rather than overall procedure precision or accuracy.

RESULTS

We found targeting precision < 1 mm (standard deviation) for locating the entry hole and <  ~ 1° (SD) for both version and inclination. The latter value was markedly lower than the end-to-end angular precision achieved by previously reported TSA navigation systems (approximately 3°-5° SD).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that variability during the targeting phase represents a small fraction of the overall variability exhibited by existing systems, so a less obtrusive navigation system for TSA based on laser-engraved tooling is likely feasible, which could improve the uptake rates of surgical navigation for TSA, thereby potentially leading to improved overall surgical outcomes.

Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty

The biomechanics of the shoulder relies on careful balancing between stability and mobility. A thorough understanding of normal and degenerative shoulder anatomy is necessary, as the goal of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is to reproduce premorbid shoulder kinematics.With reported joint reaction forces up to 2.4 times bodyweight, failure to restore anatomy and therefore provide a stable fulcrum will result in early implant failure secondary to glenoid loosening.The high variability of proximal humeral anatomy can be addressed with modular stems or stemless humeral components. The development of three-dimensional planning has led to a better understanding of the complex nature of glenoid bone deformity in eccentric osteoarthritis.The treatment of cuff tear arthropathy patients was revolutionized by the arrival of Grammont's reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The initial design medialized the centre of rotation and distalized the humerus, allowing up to a 42% increase in the deltoid moment arm.More modern reverse designs have maintained the element of restored stability but sought a more anatomic postoperative position to minimize complications and maximize rotational range of motion. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:918-931. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210014.

Prosthetic Bearing Surfaces in Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse TSA have provided an effective treatment for glenohumeral osteoarthritis; however, longevity of the procedure may be limited by osteolysis and polyethylene wear. In TSA, glenoid component failure occurs through several mechanisms, the most common being aseptic loosening and polyethylene wear. Newer bearing surfaces such as highly cross-linked ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene, vitamin E processing, ceramic heads, and pyrolytic carbon surfaces have shown improved wear characteristics in biomechanical and some early clinical studies. The purpose of this review is to provide a historical perspective and current state of the art of bearing surface technology in anatomic and reverse TSA.

Wear performance of inverted non-conforming bearings in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Glenoid component failures still represent the most common complication in total shoulder arthroplasty. These failures depend on several factors, including ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear. One reason for UHMWPE wear in total shoulder arthroplasty may be the current use of a spherical prosthetic humeral head against a radially mismatched UHMWPE glenoid component, which leads to reduced glenohumeral translations, glenoid edge loading and high translational forces during shoulder motions. The aim of this study was to assess the in vitro wear of an anatomic total shoulder prosthesis with non-spherical non-conforming bearings with inverted conventional materials.

METHODS

The wear of a vitamin E-blended UHMWPE non-spherical humeral head articulating against a non-conforming titanium-niobium nitride (TiNbN)-coated metallic glenoid was tested using a joint simulator. The wear test was performed by applying a constant load of 756 N with angular motions and translations.

RESULTS

After 2.5 million cycles, the mean wear rate of the humeral head was 0.28 ± standard deviation (SD) 0.45 mg/million cycles.

CONCLUSION

The low wear rate of the vitamin E UHMWPE humeral head supports the use of non-spherical non-conforming bearings with inverted conventional materials in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Backside wear in acetabular hip joint replacement

INTRODUCTION

Besides head-insert articulation in hip joint replacements, micro-motions between the backside of assembled polyethylene acetabular liners and the metal cup may cause additional wear. Pelvic osteolysis frequently occurs in the region of screw holes, and cup loosening hints to clinically relevant amounts of polyethylene backside wear. It has yet to be confirmed whether backside wear particles differ in size and morphology compared to articulating wear. Previous methods have been limited to subjective assessment of backside surface damages without consideration of wear debris. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a method for quantitative in vitro measurements of polyethylene backside wear in artificial hip cups and to characterize these wear particles for the first time.

METHODS

Titanium cup-systems (Plasmafit®Plus7, Aesculap, UHMWPE liner) were sinusoidally loaded (2.5 kN) and a torque of 5 Nm was simultaneously applied. The front and rear side of the cup were separated to isolate backside wear. After 2 × 10⁶ cycles the surrounding fluid was filtered and a particle analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Backside wear had a particles size of 64.1 ± 1.9 nm and was verified as round and oval particles with partly rough outlines. An estimated total number of particles of 1.26 × 10⁹ ± 1.67 × 10⁸ per 10⁶ cycles was determined.

CONCLUSION

Backside wear was estimated to be several times lower than published values of articulating wear. However, polyethylene backside wear particles represented significantly smaller particles with partly roughened outlines than articulating wear particles and may therefore cause higher biological response in macrophage-mediated bone resorption compared to articulated particles.

STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE

Within this study, an analytical method for quantitative measuring polyethylene backside wear of artificial hip cups was successfully developed and validated for the first time. It could be shown that backside wear is still present, even in modern cup-systems. These findings can be further used for investigations of the osteolytic potential of polyethylene particles, for evaluating and improving new implant systems and to evaluate the effectiveness of screw hole plugs to prevent the particle migration to the acetabulum.