Plate fixation of clavicle fractures: comparison between early and delayed surgery

Does the treatment modality affect nosocomial pneumonia and other in-hospital outcomes in patients with combined injuries to the ribs and clavicle? A propensity score weighted analysis of a retrospective cohort

OBJECTIVE

What is the effect of surgical or conservative treatment on the in-hospital outcomes of patients with combined fractures of the clavicle and ribs?

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two level-1 trauma centers and academic teaching hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts.

PATIENTS

All adult patients with a clavicle fracture and ≥3 rib fractures admitted from 2016 to 2021.

INTERVENTION

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Nosocomial pneumonia, hospital length-of-stay (HLOS), ICU length-of-stay (ILOS), days on mechanical ventilation (DMV).

RESULTS

252 patients were included (212 conservative, 40 surgical; median age 62 years, 67% male). The median ISS and GCS scores were 17 and 15, respectively. Thirty-seven patients developed nosocomial pneumonia. For clavicle fixation (n = 26), the OR for pneumonia was 0.3 (95% CI 0.0-2.2), ILOS had a ß-coefficient of -2.6 (95% CI -5.9-0.8), and DMV a ß-coefficient of -3.6 (95% CI -12.0-4.8). For rib plating (n = 10), the OR for pneumonia was 1.4 (95% CI 0.2-8.6), HLOS had a ß-coefficient of 4.9 (95% CI -1.6-11.5), and ILOS a ß-coefficient of 4.1 (95% CI -0.4-8.6). For both surgeries (n = 4), the CIs were wide.

CONCLUSION

Clavicle fixation in patients with combined injuries of the clavicle and ribs did not improve nor worsen in-hospital outcomes; the orthopedic surgeon should make a patient-tailored treatment decision. Rib plating did not improve in-hospital outcomes in non-flail patients with a concomitant clavicle fracture. Guidelines on non-flail rib plating could profit from these findings in combination with previous and additional research.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Therapeutic Study.

Timing of Olecranon Fracture Fixation Does Not Affect Early Complication or Reoperation Rates

Purpose

Surgical fixation of olecranon fractures can lead to soft-tissue complications and return to the operating room for hardware removal. While some risk factors of complications after olecranon fracture fixation have been described, the effects of fixation timing on complications and reoperation have not been evaluated. The purpose of the present study was to assess whether the timing of olecranon fracture fixation affects complication and reoperation rates.

Methods

All patients who underwent olecranon fracture open reduction and internal fixation at a single level 1 trauma center from January 2012 to February 2022 were included in the study. A retrospective review was performed to evaluate patients for inclusion and to identify patient demographic factors, medical comorbidities, concomitant injuries, mechanism of injury, and time to fixation. Operative and clinical notes were evaluated to identify fixation type and outcomes of interest. Patients were stratified into early, standard, and delayed fixation groups (0-3 days, 4-14 days, and >14 days, respectively) for independent analyses, and Fisher's exact test was used to identify differences in complications and reoperations between groups. Multivariate analysis was used to assess associations between patient demographic factors, complication rates, and time to surgery.

Results

A total of 97 patients met inclusion criteria of having an olecranon open reduction and internal fixation and had a minimum follow-up of at least 10 weeks, with an average follow-up of 7.1 months. The average time to surgery in the overall cohort was 9.3 days. There were no differences in the number of total complications and rate of reoperation among the three cohorts. Smoking was found to be significantly associated with total complications, while open fracture was significantly associated with reoperation. Polytrauma and open fracture were significantly associated with earlier operation, while smoking was significantly associated with delayed fixation.

Conclusions

The timing of fixation of displaced olecranon fractures does not significantly increase the rate of early complications or reoperation.

Type of study/level of evidence

Symptom Prevalence Study III.

Complications and Outcomes After Surgical Intervention in Clavicular Nonunion: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Surgical repair of clavicle fractures is being employed more frequently, although most fractures are still treated conservatively. Both can result in nonunion. Current treatments for clavicle nonunion include open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) plating without bone graft, ORIF plating with bone graft, and intramedullary pin fixation.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting outcome, complication, and reoperation rates following surgical treatment for clavicle nonunion. Subgroup analysis was undertaken for outcome and complication rates between single plating and intramedullary pin fixation, bone graft use, and nonunion time length definition.

RESULTS

Fifty-three studies met inclusion criteria (1,258 clavicle nonunions). Mean clinical follow-up was 2.6 years. Seventy-two percent of nonunions were of the middle third, 1% were proximal third, 12% were distal third, and 15% were not reported. Forty-eight percent of nonunions were atrophic or oligotrophic and 17% were hypertrophic (35% not reported). Mean time to union was 13.6 weeks. Ninety-five percent of patients achieved union after the primary nonunion surgery. Overall complication rate was 17%. Single-plating fixation had significantly faster union time (15.2 vs. 19.8 weeks), lower reoperation rate (23% vs. 37%), and hardware removal rate (20% vs. 34%) than intramedullary pin fixation. Bone graft had significantly lower rates of delayed union (0.6% vs. 3.6%) but higher complication (15% vs. 8%) and reoperation rates (29% vs. 14%) than the other groups. Studies that defined nonunion after 3 months had significantly faster union times than the 6-month studies (13 vs. 16 weeks). The 3-month group had a significantly lower overall complication rate (12% vs. 25%) and hardware/fixation failure rate (3% vs. 5.5%) than the 6-month group.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review is the largest report of complications, reoperations, and patient outcomes of clavicle nonunions after surgical intervention in the current literature. Plating showed faster time to union and lower reoperation rates than intramedullary pin fixation. Bone graft use showed lower rates of delayed union but substantially higher rates of complications and reoperations. Reports with a definition of nonunion at 3 months showed faster union times and lower complication rates compared to reports with a definition of nonunion that was 6 months or greater. Surgery could be considered at 3 months post-injury in cases of symptomatic non-united clavicle fracture, and plating results in reliable outcomes. Adjuvant bone grafting requires further study to determine its value and risk/benefit ratio.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Systematic Review. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Management of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures with Figure-of-Eight Bandage: The Impact of Residual Shortening on Shoulder Function

The treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (MCFs) is still controversial. The aims of our study were to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes and complications of patients with displaced MCFs managed nonoperatively and to identify potential predictive factors of worse clinical outcomes. Seventy-five patients with displaced MCFs were enrolled and treated nonoperatively with a figure-of-eight bandage (F8-B). Initial shortening (IS) and displacement (ID) of fragments were radiographically evaluated at the time of diagnosis and immediately after F8-B application by residual shortening (RS) and displacement (RD). The clavicle shortening ratio was evaluated clinically at last follow-up. Functional outcomes were assessed using Constant (CS), q-DASH, DASH work and DASH sport scores. Cosmetic outcomes and rate of complications were evaluated. Good to very good mid-term clinical results were achieved by using the institutional treatment protocol. Multiple regression identified RS as an independent predictor of shoulder function, while RD affects fracture healing. These findings support the efficacy of our institutional protocol and thus could be useful for orthopedic surgeons during the decision-making process.

Monopolar and Bipolar Combination Injuries of the Clavicle: Retrospective Incidence Analysis and Proposal of a New Classification System

Clavicle injuries are common, but only few case reports describe combined clavicular injuries (CCI). CCI include combinations between clavicular fractures and acromioclavicular/sternoclavicular joint dislocations (SCJD). We present the first general therapeutic recommendations for CCI based on a new classification and their distribution. A retrospective, epidemiological, big data analysis was based on ICD-10 diagnoses from 2012 to 2014 provided by the German Federal Statistical Office. CCI represent 0.7% of all clavicle-related injuries (n = 814 out of 114,003). SCJD show by far the highest proportion of combination injuries (13.2% of all SCJD were part of CCI) while the proportion of CCI in relation to the other injury entities was significantly less (p < 0.023). CCIs were classified depending on (1) the polarity (monopolar type I, 92.2% versus bipolar type II, 7.8%). Monopolar type I was further differentiated depending on (2) the positional relationship between the combined injuries: Ia two injuries directly at the respective pole versus Ib with an injury at one end plus an additional midshaft clavicle fracture. Type II was further differentiated depending on (3) the injured structures: IIa ligamento-osseous, type IIb purely ligamentous (rarest with 0.6%). According to our classification, the CCI severity increases from type Ia to IIb. CCI are more important than previously believed and seen as an indication for surgery. The exclusion of further, contra-polar injuries in the event of a clavicle injury is clinically relevant and should be focused.