1
|
Mizels J, Lewis DC, Tashjian RZ, Chalmers PN. Hydrogen Peroxide May Reduce the Risk for Revision Surgery and Infection in Primary Shoulder Arthroplasty: Two-year Follow-up From a Prospective, Blinded, Controlled Trial. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024:00124635-990000000-00990. [PMID: 38759230 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of hydrogen peroxide to the preoperative skin preparation for primary total shoulder arthroplasty is associated with a difference in patient-reported outcomes, risk for postoperative infection, and risk for revision surgery at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. METHODS This was a prospective, blinded, and controlled trial, which included a consecutive series of patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty. The control group underwent standard sterile skin preparation using ethyl alcohol and ChloraPrep applicators, and the peroxide group had the same preparation with the addition of hydrogen peroxide between the alcohol and ChloraPrep applications. We then compared patient-reported outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score [ASES], simple shoulder test [SST], visual analog scale [VAS]), infections, and revision surgeries between the two groups at 2-year follow-up. RESULTS Of the 61 patients included in the original study, 52 of 58 (85%) living patients agreed to participate in this study. No preoperative differences were observed between groups. No difference was observed in ASES, SST, or VAS scores at 2 years. More revision surgeries were done in the control group (7 versus 2, P = 0.268) and Cutibacterium acnes infections (2 versus 0, P = 0.168). CONCLUSION The addition of hydrogen peroxide to the preoperative skin preparation before primary shoulder arthroplasty is safe, and additional research is warranted to investigate whether it may decrease the risk for revision surgery and postoperative C acnes infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Mizels
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim HM, Huff H, Smith MJ, Nguyen M, Smith C. Effect of making skin incision with electrocautery on positive Cutibacterium acnes culture rates in shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:6-13. [PMID: 37579940 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cutibacterium acnes remains the most commonly detected organism in shoulder arthroplasty. C acnes infection is thought to occur during shoulder arthroplasty through contamination of the surgical field with C acnes from the incised dermis. The purpose of this study was to examine whether using electrocautery for making skin incisions would decrease C acnes culture rates at the incised dermis compared to using scalpels during shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS Patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty were randomized into 2 groups, electrocautery vs. scalpel incision group. All patients received a standard preoperative antiseptic preparation including chlorhexidine gluconate showers, intravenous antibiotic administration, and topical application of hydrogen peroxide, povidone iodine, isopropyl alcohol, and DuraPrep. Cultures were obtained from the incised dermal edge immediately after skin incision and later from surgeon's gloves and forceps immediately prior to humeral component implantation. The primary outcome was positive C acnes culture rates compared between the groups. RESULTS A total of 64 patients (32 in each group) were enrolled. There were 24 males in each group. Regarding dermis cultures, 10 patients (31%) in the scalpel group were positive with 8 of them positive for C acnes, whereas no patients in the electrocautery group were positive (P < .001). Regarding glove cultures, the electrocautery group had 8 patients positive C acnes, while the scalpel group had 8 (P = .777). Regarding forceps cultures, the electrocautery group had 4 patients positive for C acnes, and the scalpel group had 6 (P = .491). All positive cultures were exclusively from male patients. There were no wound complications or infection in the electrocautery group while the scalpel group had 1 acute postoperative infection. CONCLUSIONS Making skin incisions using electrocautery resulted in 0 C acnes culture at the incised dermis, suggesting its potential effect against C acnes. However, despite this initial antibacterial effect, C acnes still appeared on surgeon's gloves and forceps during surgery of male patients. All positive cultures were from male patients, suggesting that the source of C acnes was specifically related to the male body. While the study hypothesis was supported by the results, the present study also raises new questions and calls for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Mike Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
| | - Haley Huff
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Matthew J Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Michael Nguyen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Conor Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Markes AR, Bigham J, Ma CB, Iyengar JJ, Feeley BT. Preventing and Treating Infection in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2023:10.1007/s12178-023-09843-1. [PMID: 37227587 PMCID: PMC10382412 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-023-09843-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Periprosthetic infection after shoulder arthroplasty is relatively uncommon though associated with severe long-term morbidity when encountered. The purpose of the review is to summarize the recent literature regarding the definition, clinical evaluation, prevention, and management of prosthetic joint infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. RECENT FINDINGS The landmark report generated at the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection has provided a framework for diagnosis, prevention, and management of periprosthetic infections after shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder specific literature with validated interventions to reduce prosthetic joint infection is limited; however existing literature from retrospective studies and from total hip and knee arthroplasty allows us to make relative guidelines. One and two-stage revisions seem to demonstrate similar outcomes; however, no controlled comparative studies exist limiting the ability to make definitive recommendations between the two options. We report on recent literature regarding the current diagnostic, preventative, and treatment options for periprosthetic infection after shoulder arthroplasty. Much of the literature does not distinguish between anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and further high-level shoulder specific studies are needed to answer questions generated from this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander R Markes
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, 1500 Owens Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
| | - Joseph Bigham
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - C Benjamin Ma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, 1500 Owens Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | | | - Brian T Feeley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, 1500 Owens Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Green N, Jordan RW, Maclean S, D'Alessandro P, MacDonald PB, Malik SS. Preoperative topical benzoyl peroxide treatment is effective in reducing Cutibacterium acnes in shoulder surgery: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:213-222. [PMID: 36067940 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cutibacterium acnes (C acnes) colonization can have a significant impact on patients undergoing both arthroscopic and open shoulder surgery with regard to postoperative infection. Its resistance to standard preoperative skin preparations and prophylactic antibiotics has led to a need for a more targeted therapy. Topical benzoyl peroxide (BPO) has been used by dermatologists in the treatment for acnes due to its bactericidal and penetrative effects through the dermal layer. The aim of this systematic review is to review the effectiveness of topical BPO preoperatively in shoulder surgery in reducing C acnes colonization and postoperative infection. METHODS A review of the online databases Medline and Embase was conducted on December 15, 2021, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review was registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database. Clinical studies reporting superficial and deep sample microbiology and postoperative complications were included. The studies were appraised using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (ROB 2) tool for randomized studies and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. RESULTS The search strategy identified 10 studies for inclusion (6 randomized control trials, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 2 case series), including a total of 482 patients. Seven studies were comparable, testing BPO against alternative standard skin preparations. Of the 10 studies, 7 showed a decrease in the load of C acnes on the skin and/or deep tissues, of which 6 demonstrated statistical significance. Men were shown to have a statistically significant increase in the colonization rate of C acnes. Scheer et al (2021) demonstrated 4500 colony-forming units/mL in males and 900 colony-forming units/mL in females. In studies where the number of BPO applications was higher, BPO appeared more effective. Dizay et al demonstrated C acnes elimination in 78.9% with more than 1 application compared with 66.7% if only applied once. Three studies looked at the effectiveness of BPO during the operative timeline with 1 demonstrating its statistically significant effectiveness at reducing colonization 2 hours into the operation (P = .048). CONCLUSION BPO is effective as a topical treatment at reducing C acnes colonization before shoulder surgery. However, the relationship between duration of treatment, frequency of application, and gender requires further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Green
- Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, UK.
| | - Robert W Jordan
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Peter D'Alessandro
- Orthopaedic Research Foundation of Western Australia, Claremont, WA, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sagkrioti M, Glass S, Arealis G. Evaluation of the effectiveness of skin preparation methods for the reduction of Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes) in shoulder surgery: a systematic review. Shoulder Elbow 2022; 14:583-597. [PMID: 36479010 PMCID: PMC9720868 DOI: 10.1177/17585732211032523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) is the most common pathogen responsible for post-operative shoulder infections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of skin preparation methods against C. acnes in shoulder surgery. Methods A systematic review was conducted evaluating the effectiveness of skin preparation methods in the reduction of C. acnes in patients undergoing shoulder surgery. Outcomes were assessed based on the effectiveness of the method used; side effects and cost were also analysed. Results Of the 19 included studies, 9 evaluated pre-surgical home treatments: 8 assessed benzoyl peroxide (BPO) and 6 concluded it is effective in reducing C. acnes. Nine studies assessed surgical skin preparation and concluded that Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) was not effective; in contrast hydrogen peroxide reduced C. acnes. Finally, one study evaluated an aseptic protocol using CHG and concluded that it was not effective. Conclusions It was demonstrated that BPO as home treatment is effective in reducing C. acnes load on skin; it rarely causes side effects and is also cost-effective. This study highlights non-effectiveness of CHG. There was some evidence that the addition of hydrogen peroxide could have a positive effect in the reduction of C. acnes skin load; however, more studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Sagkrioti
- Department of Infection Prevention and Control, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK
| | - Stephen Glass
- Department of Microbiology, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK
| | - Georgios Arealis
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Panther EJ, Hao KA, Wright JO, Schoch JJ, Ritter AS, King JJ, Wright TW, Schoch BS. Techniques for Decreasing Bacterial Load for Open Shoulder Surgery. JBJS Rev 2022; 10:01874474-202211000-00007. [PMID: 36821410 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.22.00141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
» Benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 5% has been shown to reduce Cutibacterium acnes load on the skin. BPO 5% with miconazole nitrate (MN) 2% may be beneficial, whereas BPO 5% with clindamycin cream 1% to 1.2% does not seem to have additive effects when compared with BPO 5% alone. Chlorhexidine gluconate solutions reduce the total bacterial load on the skin, but do not seem to have a significant effect on C. acnes. » ChloraPrep seems to be the best surgical skin preparation to decrease overall positive skin cultures. Preincisional hydrogen peroxide 3% application has been shown to be a cost-effective practice to inhibit growth of C. acnes. Vancomycin powder before deltopectoral interval closure has antimicrobial effects against C. acnes and is a cost-effective practice. Finally, Bactisure surgical lavage is protective against the formation of biofilms. » IV cefazolin has been shown to be more effective for shoulder arthroplasty infection prophylaxis than antibiotic alternatives such as vancomycin. Thus, patients with a questionable history of penicillin allergy should undergo additional testing. » For shoulder surgery infection prophylaxis, we recommend the use of BPO 5% cream for 5 days preoperatively with chlorhexidine wipes the night before and the morning of surgery. IV cefazolin should be administered perioperatively, and patients with a questionable history of penicillin allergy should be tested. Surgeons should consider preincisional application of hydrogen peroxide 3% for 5 minutes, followed by standard ChloraPrep preparation. Normal saline should be used for preclosure lavage. Finally, application of vancomycin powder deep to the deltopectoral interval closure should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Panther
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Kevin A Hao
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Jonathan O Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Jennifer J Schoch
- Department of Dermatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Alaina S Ritter
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Joseph J King
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Thomas W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Bradley S Schoch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Collins AP, Simpson J, Richey B, Zaruta D, Levin S, Lewellyn B, Service BC. Efficacy of antimicrobial washes before shoulder surgery against Cutibacterium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JSES REVIEWS, REPORTS, AND TECHNIQUES 2022; 2:315-322. [PMID: 37588870 PMCID: PMC10426554 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Background Cutibacterium acnes is a commensal intradermal microorganism that is commonly isolated at revision shoulder arthroplasty. Standard practice chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) skin preparation agents have limited effectiveness at eradicating C. acnes in the dermis. Benzoyl peroxide (BPO) has demonstrated effectiveness against C. acnes. This meta-analysis compares the efficacy of at-home shoulder decolonization before surgery using CHG vs. BPO to reduce shoulder C. acnes burden. Methods This was a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses systematic review. PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched for studies evaluating the effects of CHG and BPO in reducing C. acnes at the shoulder. Trial results were extracted and pooled using a random effects model, separating data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs. Methodologic quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tools. Results Ten studies (589 patients) were included. RCTs showed that both BPO and CHG led to significant reductions in culture positivity compared with negative controls (risk ratio [RR] with 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.20 [0.13, 0.30], P < .0001 and 0.46 [0.37, 0.57], P < .0001, respectively). Non-RCT data demonstrated similar results comparing BPO and CHG to the control (RR with 95% CI = 0.34 [0.21, 0.57], P < .0001 and 0.31 [0.20, 0.49], P < .0001, respectively). Comparing BPO and CHG, RCT data showed a significant reduction in culture positivity with BPO (RR with 95% CI = 0.46 [0.27, 0.77], P < .009). Of RCTs, 5 were low and one was of moderate risk of bias. Of non-RCTs, 3 had low risk of bias, whereas one had moderate risk of bias. Conclusion This review demonstrated that preoperative CHG and BPO can reduce C. acnes at the shoulder. However, BPO exhibits greater efficacy than CHG, potentially because of the compound's ability to penetrate the dermis. BPO is a simple and economical agent that may reduce joint exposure to C. acnes in shoulder surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeffrey Simpson
- Orlando Health Jewett Orthopedic Institute, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Bradley Richey
- Orlando Health Jewett Orthopedic Institute, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Douglas Zaruta
- Orlando Health Jewett Orthopedic Institute, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Samantha Levin
- Orlando Health Jewett Orthopedic Institute, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Brett Lewellyn
- Orlando Health Jewett Orthopedic Institute, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Polce EM, Cotter EJ, Polania-Gonzalez E, Grogan BF. Patient Compliance and Satisfaction with Topical Benzoyl Peroxide Gel Prior to Shoulder Surgery. JSES Int 2022; 6:686-689. [PMID: 35813137 PMCID: PMC9263990 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Methods Results Conclusion
Collapse
|
9
|
Cotter EJ, Cotter LM, Franczek EB, Godfrey JJ, Hetzel SJ, Safdar N, Dai T, Arkin L, Grogan BF. Efficacy of combinational therapy using blue light and benzoyl peroxide in reducing Cutibacterium acnes bioburden at the deltopectoral interval: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:2671-2681. [PMID: 34478863 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of blue light therapy (BLT) and 5% topical benzoyl peroxide (BPO) gel in combination with standard chlorhexidine (CHX) preparation in eradicating Cutibacterium acnes at the deltopectoral interval measured by positive, quantitative culture findings. METHODS Adult male volunteers were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups: BPO, BLT, and BPO followed by BLT. Contralateral shoulders served as matched controls. Volunteers randomized to BPO applied the gel for a total of 5 treatments. In the BLT group, a single 23-minute treatment was administered at an estimated irradiance of 40 mW/cm2 (radiant exposure, 55.2 J/cm2). In the BPO-BLT group, volunteers received both treatments as described earlier. After treatment with either BPO, BLT, or both, a single swab culture was taken from the treatment shoulder. Next, control and treatment shoulders were prepared with CHX, and cultures were taken from each shoulder. Cultures were sent for anaerobic quantitative growth analysis with both polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing confirmation of presumptive C acnes colonies. RESULTS This study enrolled 60 male volunteers, 20 per group, with no loss to follow-up. After treatment but prior to CHX administration, all culture samples in the BPO group and BLT group grew C acnes. Prior to CHX, 16 samples (80%) in the BPO-BLT group grew C acnes. On quantitative analysis, the BPO group and BPO-BLT group had significantly less growth of C acnes compared with the BLT group after treatment but prior to CHX (P < .05 for each). Following CHX administration, the BPO and BPO-BLT groups had significantly fewer positive culture findings (odds ratios of 0.03 and 0.29, respectively) and less quantity of growth compared with their control arms (P < .05). This was not seen in the BLT group. For quantitative between-group analysis, no significant synergistic effects were seen with BPO-BLT compared with BPO alone (P = .688). There was no difference in side effects between groups. CONCLUSION The combination of topical BPO and CHX was effective at eliminating C acnes in most cases. BLT alone did not demonstrate effective antimicrobial properties against C acnes at the radiant exposure administered in this study. Combining BPO and BLT did not lead to significant synergistic antimicrobial effects. Both BPO and BLT are safe with few, transient side effects reported. More work is needed to determine whether BLT at higher radiant exposures or serial treatment results in bactericidal effects against C acnes in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Cotter
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| | - Lisa M Cotter
- Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Elliot B Franczek
- Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jared J Godfrey
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Scott J Hetzel
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Nasia Safdar
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Tianhong Dai
- Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medicine School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa Arkin
- Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Brian F Grogan
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nabergoj M, Denard PJ, Collin P, Trebše R, Lädermann A. Radiological changes, infections and neurological complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty related to different design types and their rates: Part II. EFORT Open Rev 2021; 6:1109-1121. [PMID: 34909229 PMCID: PMC8631237 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Early reported complication rates with the Grammont-type reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) were very high, up to 24%.A 'problem' is defined as an intraoperative or postoperative event that is not likely to affect the patient's final outcome, such as intraoperative cement extravasation and radiographic changes. A 'complication' is defined as an intraoperative or postoperative event that is likely to affect the patient's final outcome, including infection, neurologic injury and intrathoracic central glenoid screw placement.Radiographic changes around the glenoid or humeral components of the RSA are very frequently observed and described in the literature.High complication rates related to the Grammont RSA design led to development of non-Grammont designs which led to a dramatic fall in the majority of complications.The percentage of radiological changes after RSA is not negligible and remains unsolved, despite a decrease in its occurrence in the last decade. However, such changes should be now considered as simple problems because they rarely have a negative influence on the patient's final outcome, and their prevalence has dramatically decreased.With further changes in indications and designs for RSA, it is crucial to accurately track the rates and types of complications to justify its new designs and increased indications. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:1109-1121. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210040.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marko Nabergoj
- Valdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Ankaran, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Philippe Collin
- Centre Hospitalier Privé Saint-Grégoire (Vivalto Santé), Saint- Grégoire, France
| | - Rihard Trebše
- Valdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Ankaran, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Alexandre Lädermann
- Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital
- Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Foster AL, Cutbush K, Ezure Y, Schuetz MA, Crawford R, Paterson DL. Cutibacterium acnes in shoulder surgery: a scoping review of strategies for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:1410-1422. [PMID: 33373684 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cutibacterium acnes is a commensal, gram-positive, facultatively anaerobic bacillus that resides in the dermis. Historically thought to be a contaminant when identified on cultured specimens, recent advances in diagnostic technology have now implicated it as the most common organism responsible for postoperative shoulder infections. Despite a recognition of the role of this organism and a significant research interest in recent years, there is clear lack of consensus guideline on strategies to prevent, diagnose, and treat postoperative shoulder infection. METHOD The electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched in March 2020. All experimental and nonexperimental studies that investigate C acnes in shoulder surgery were included. Inclusion was limited to articles published after 2000 and written in English; reviews, gray literature, or abstracts were excluded. A total of 70 studies were included in this review. This scoping review was performed in accordance with the Extended Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). RESULTS Standard surgical prophylactic regimens such as intravenous antibiotics and topical chlorhexidine are ineffective at removing C acnes from the deep layer of the dermis, and there is a shift toward using topical benzoyl peroxide with significantly improved efficacy. An improved understanding of the bacteria has demonstrated that a prolonged culture time of up to 14 days is needed, especially in cases of established infection. Advances in diagnostics such as sonication and molecular-based testing are promising. Although usually thought to be susceptible to a broad range of antibiotics, resistance is emerging to clindamycin. An improved understanding of its ability to form a biofilm highlights the difficulty in treating an established infection. CONCLUSION The role of C acnes causing postoperative infection following shoulder surgery is being increasingly recognized. Strategies for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment have been outlined from both an antimicrobial and surgical perspective. A number of these strategies are emerging and require further research to demonstrate efficacy before implementation into clinical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew L Foster
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia; Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia; Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Kenneth Cutbush
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Yukiko Ezure
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, RBWH Campus, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Michael A Schuetz
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia; Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Ross Crawford
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - David L Paterson
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, RBWH Campus, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Contreras ES, Frantz TL, Bishop JY, Cvetanovich GL. Periprosthetic Infection After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: a Review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2020; 13:757-768. [PMID: 32827305 PMCID: PMC7661562 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-020-09670-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Periprosthetic infection is a relatively rare but potentially devastating complication after shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this article is to review the incidence, diagnosis, prevention, and management of periprosthetic infections after reverse shoulder arthroplasty, with a focus on literature published within the last 5 years. RECENT FINDINGS The 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection provides us with a framework for the diagnosis and management of periprosthetic infections after shoulder arthroplasty. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has a higher reported rate of infection compared with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Our current diagnostic tests do not appear to be as sensitive when compared with the hip and knee literature. Similar success has been reported with single and two-stage revision protocols, although prospective comparative data are lacking. The significance of unexpected positive cultures during revision arthroplasty remains unclear. We report current diagnostic and therapeutic options for periprosthetic infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Much of the current literature does not distinguish between anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Further high-level studies are warranted to refine these definitions and guide management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik S. Contreras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH USA
| | - Travis L. Frantz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH USA
| | - Julie Y. Bishop
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH USA
| | - Gregory L. Cvetanovich
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Menendez ME, Moverman MA, Puzzitiello RN, Pagani NR, Namdari S. A break-even analysis of benzoyl peroxide and hydrogen peroxide for infection prevention in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:2185-2189. [PMID: 32650074 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Newer strategies to decolonize the shoulder of Cutibacterium acnes may hold promise in minimizing the occurrence of infections after shoulder arthroplasty, but little is known about their cost-effectiveness. Break-even models can determine the economic viability of interventions in settings with low outcome event rates that would realistically preclude a randomized clinical trial. We used such modeling to determine the economic viability of benzoyl peroxide and hydrogen peroxide for infection prevention in shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS Skin decolonization protocol costs ($11.76 for benzoyl peroxide; $0.96 for hydrogen peroxide), baseline infection rates for shoulder arthroplasty (0.70%), and infection-related care costs ($50,230) were derived from institutional records and the literature. A break-even equation incorporating these variables was developed to determine the absolute risk reduction (ARR) in the infection rate to make prophylactic use economically justified. The number needed to treat was calculated from the ARR. RESULTS Topical benzoyl peroxide is considered economically justified if it prevents at least 1 infection out of 4348 shoulder arthroplasties (ARR = 0.023%). Hydrogen peroxide is economically justified if it prevents at least 1 infection out of 50,000 cases (ARR = 0.002%). These protocols remained economically viable at varying unit costs, initial infection rates, and infection-related care costs. CONCLUSIONS The use of topical benzoyl peroxide and skin preparations with hydrogen peroxide are highly economically justified practices for infection prevention in shoulder arthroplasty. Efforts to determine drawbacks of routine skin decolonization strategies are warranted as they may change the value analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariano E Menendez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA, USA.
| | - Michael A Moverman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA, USA
| | - Richard N Puzzitiello
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA, USA
| | - Nicholas R Pagani
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA, USA
| | - Surena Namdari
- Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kaveeshwar S, Duvall G, Jones DL, O'Hara NN, Klein A, Diedrich AM, Kolakowski L, Lai JK, Hasan SA, Henn RF, Gilotra MN. Risk factors for increased shoulder Cutibacterium acnes burden. JSES Int 2020; 4:464-469. [PMID: 32939469 PMCID: PMC7479048 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cutibacterium acnes is the primary cause of shoulder surgery infections, but the predisposition to larger skin counts and potentially higher risk for postoperative infection remains unclear. This study aimed to quantify risk factors influencing endogenous C. acnes burden and to compare counts among 4 shoulder sites. Methods C. acnes counts were quantified via a detergent scrub technique for 173 participants. Bivariate and multivariable stepwise linear regression statistical analyses were used to investigate the association of sex, age, ethnicity, degree of hirsutism, diabetes, smoking status, body mass index, and location with counts. A separate Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed analyzing counts of East/Southeast Asians vs. all other ethnicities. Results Sex, age, degree of hirsutism, diabetes, smoking status, and body mass index were included in the multivariable stepwise linear regression analysis. The multiple regression analysis isolated individuals <40 years with the highest burden (P = .001). Males had a 191% increase in C. acnes counts compared with females (P = .001). Increased hirsutism was further indicated to be a risk factor for the male sex although not in a dose-dependent manner (P = .027). Wilcoxon rank-sum test results found that East/Southeast Asians had the lowest load (P = .019), although not significant in the multivariate model. Conclusion Surgical site C. acnes infections occur more frequently in younger males, and males <40 years with shoulder-specific hirsutism have the highest preoperative burden. East/Southeast Asians have lower raw counts of C. acnes compared with other ethnicities that may be related to less hirsutism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Kaveeshwar
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Grant Duvall
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Derek L Jones
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nathan N O'Hara
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ashley Klein
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Aloise M Diedrich
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Logan Kolakowski
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jim K Lai
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - S Ashfaq Hasan
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - R Frank Henn
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mohit N Gilotra
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|