Soft tissue injury patterns in posteromedial rotatory instability with dislocation compared with posteromedial dislocation of the elbow joint

A Feasibility Study on Using Hanging Arm Test to Assess Elbow Stability During Surgical Treatment for Varus Posteromedial Rotatory Instability

Objectives

The aim of this study to investigate the safety and effectiveness of performing the hanging arm test during surgical treatment for elbow varus posteromedial rotatory instability (VPMRI) to assess elbow stability and determine whether to repair the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL).

Methods

In a retrospective study from August 2014 to March 2019, 27 patients with VPMRI who had a negative result in the hanging arm test after fixation of coronoid fracture were selected. Intraoperative bleeding, operative time, elbow range of motion (ROM), and complications were recorded. Elbow function was evaluated with the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score.

Results

The operation time was 85.9 ± 11.06 min (range 65-110). The intraoperative blood loss was 70.7 ± 9.31 ml (range 60-100). At the last follow-up, the elbow joint averaged 73.8° ± 2.931° in pronation, 78.9° ± 2.941° in supination, 7.2° ± 3.207° in extension, and 123.3° ± 6.651° in flexion. The MEPS score was 90.7 ± 4.36 (range 74-95), and the DASH score was 9.8 ± 2.58 (range 6.67-13.3). One patient presented with symptoms of ulnar nerve entrapment 2 months after operation and was treated with ulnar nerve release. The symptom of numbness went away completely 1 week after operation. No complications such as wound infection, arthritis, or chronic instability of the elbow were found in the other patients.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that not all VPMRI patients need the LUCL to be repaired, and the hanging arm test is a safe and reliable method to assess whether to repair the LUCL in the treatment of elbow VPMRI.

Level of evidence

Level IV; Retrospective studies.

Outcomes and complications after treatment for anteromedial facet fracture of the coronoid process: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Fracture of the anteromedial facet (AMF) of the coronoid process is associated with varus posteromedial rotatory instability (VPMRI). However, there is still controversy regarding the optimal treatment for AMF fracture. The purpose of this study is to report on a systematic review of the outcomes and complications after treatment for AMF fracture.

METHODS

This study was conducted using electronic databases, PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus. Studies reporting outcome scores and complications were included. Studies that did not utilize O'Driscoll classification for AMF fractures were excluded. Through conduct of a thorough review of included studies, definite VPMRI were identified and cases involving other injury mechanisms were excluded.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles reporting on 246 patients were included. According to O'Driscoll classification, 6.2% of cases were anteromedial subtype I, 73.7% were subtype II, and 20.1% were subtype III. Two-hundred sixteen patients (87.8%) were treated surgically and 30 patients (12.2%) were treated conservatively. Lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injuries were 76.2% (157/206) and medial collateral ligament injuries were 16.9% (33/195). Among 216 cases who underwent surgical treatment, depending on the fragment size, displacement, and instability, coronoid fixation was performed in 189 cases and LCL repair alone was performed in 27 cases. The mean final Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 92.1 and the Broberg & Morrey score was 89.5. The overall complication and reoperation rates were 17.7% (41/232) and 12.9% (26/202).

CONCLUSIONS

Both surgical and conservative treatment for AMF fractures resulted in satisfactory final clinical outcomes. However, high complication and reoperation rates were observed.

Acute elbow dislocation: a critical appraisal of the literature

Background

The purpose of this study was to perform a narrative review of acute elbow dislocation (AED). There are certain aspects of the management of AED that are controversial, including type and length of immobilization, indications for surgery, type of surgery, and new evidence available.

Material and methods

A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and Embase databases for studies regarding AED. Preference was given to studies according to their level of evidence. Studies regarding the outcome of conservative and surgical treatment, including patient-reported outcomes, complications, and conversion to stabilization or revision surgery were included.

Results

We found only 1 level I study and 3 level II randomized clinical trials. The rest consisted of level III-V evidence. Conservative care continues to be the standard of care for stable AEDs. Shorter immobilization periods are favored when possible. A consensus definition of an unstable elbow still needs to be improved. Unstable simple elbow dislocation may benefit from surgical intervention with different techniques showing similar outcomes. Advances in surgical procedures and suture designs, including tapes, and ligament augmentation, need to prove their role in managing acute elbow instability.

Conclusion

There is a need for higher quality studies after the reduction of an AED, including discerning the outcome of specific patterns of injury and particular groups of patients like high-level athletes or people with preoperative laxity. Comparison between different surgical techniques is warranted, including arthroscopic techniques and types of ligament augmentation to promote early motion and reduce postoperative stiffness.

MRI of the Elbow: Interpretation of Common Orthopaedic Injuries

MRI is a valuable diagnostic tool that has become an essential part of an orthopaedic surgeon's practice. When acquired in the appropriate clinical setting, an MRI can direct patient management as surgical versus nonsurgical, guide surgical decision making, and even predict patient outcomes. The quality of MRI obtained and quality of the radiology report received varies. Ultimately, the orthopaedic surgeon must interpret the available imaging and apply these findings to treat the patient. The current day practicing orthopaedic surgeon should be familiar with interpreting common MRIs. Although subspecialized orthopaedic surgeons usually have experience and understanding of MRIs in their field, the general orthopaedic surgeon and those in-training will encounter the gamut of musculoskeletal MRIs. This review focuses on common injuries that can occur in the elbow and provides an approach to minimize missed findings.

[Clinical treatment of dorsal avulsion fracture of the capitellum combined with medial or posterior medial dislocation of the elbow joint]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the possible injury mechanisms in patients with dorsal avulsion fracture of the capitellum combined with medial or posterior medial dislocation of the elbow joint, and to discuss their treatment and prognosis.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 4 patients with dorsal avulsion fracture of the capitellum combined with medial or posterior medial dislocation of the elbow joint admitted between September 2014 and September 2020, including 3 males and 1 female with an average age of 20.7 years (range, 13-32 years). There were 2 cases of dorsal avulsion fracture of the capitellum combined with medial dislocation of the elbow joint and 2 cases of dorsal avulsion fracture of the capitellum and anterior medial fracture of the coronoid process combined with posterior medial subluxation of the elbow joint. Closed reduction was performed in 3 patients with fresh fracture combined with dislocation, then 2 cases were fixed with tension band and 1 case was fixed with tension band combined with Acumed coronoid anatomic plate. And in patient with old fracture nonunion, the coronoid process was fixed with 1 screw, then the humeral sclerotic bone mass was removed, and finally the lateral collateral ligament was repaired and a hinged external fixator was added.

RESULTS

All the incisions healed by first intention without early complications such as infection or peripheral nerve injury. The 4 patients were followed up 13-30 months (mean, 20.8 months). The fractures all healed with a healing time of 70-90 days (mean, 79.5 days). At 6 months after operation, heterotopic ossification was seen in the posterior aspect of the right elbow joint in 1 case, and the alkaline phosphatase level was normal (67 U/L); the tension band was removed to clear the heterotopic ossification and the elbow joint was released. The rest of the patients had no heterotopic ossification. At last follow-up, all patients had good functional recovery of the elbow joint, with a Mayo score of 85-100 (mean, 92.5), and the excellent and good rate was 100%. The elbow flexion range of motion was 120°-135°, the extension range of motion was 10°-20°, and the pronation and supination range of motion were all 75°-85°.

CONCLUSION

Dorsal avulsion fractures of the capitellum combined with medial or posterior medial dislocation of the elbow may be due to simple varus stress. If an anteromedial coronoid facet fracture also occurs, it may be for the varus posteromedial rotatory instability, which is the opposite mechanism to that of an Osborne-Cotterill lesion. For fresh dorsal avulsion fractures of the capitellum, tension band fixation can be used with good results.

Repair Versus Non-Repair of Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament in Elbow Varus Posteromedial Rotatory Instability Treatment: A Comparative Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of repairing and not repairing the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) when surgically treating elbow varus posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI).

METHODS

In this retrospective study spanning June 2014 to February 2019, 24 patients with elbow PMRI who were treated surgically were assigned to group RL (Repair LUCL) or group NL (Non-repair LUCL) depending on whether the LUCL was repaired. Hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and related complications were reviewed. The elbow range of motion (ROM), the visual analog scale (VAS), the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score were used for functional assessment.

RESULTS

Among the 24 patients with PMRI, 15 were assigned to group RL and nine were assigned to group NL. The mean blood loss (184.66 ± 20.3 vs 207.33 ± 19.447, P < 0.001), the operation time (98.88 ± 12.693 min vs 184.66 ± 20.3 min, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in group RL compared to group NL. There were no significant differences between the two groups in time until surgery and follow-up time (6.66 ± 1.838 vs 6.11 ± 1.900 days, 25.53 ± 2.099 vs 26.11 ± 2.891 months, P = 0.577, P = 0.486). All of the patients achieved bone union. The elbow flexion-extension ROM (122.00° ± 3.162°vs 121.11° ± 3.333° at 12 months, P = 0.520) and pronation-supination ROM (154.53° ± 3.335° vs 155.55° ± 4.639° at 12 months, P = 0.537). Both groups achieved similar results in MEPS score (90.53 ± 2.695 vs 89.77 ± 3.865, P = 0.578) and DASH (9.77 ± 1.897 vs 9.99 ± 1.550, P = 0.772) score at the final follow-up. And the MEPS score revealed excellent results (87% in group RL, 89% in group NL).The VAS scores decreased significantly in group RL (from 6.13 ± 0.990 to 1.93 ± 0.593) and group NL (from 5.77 ± 1.481 to 1.88 ± 0.781), and no significant differences in preoperative or final follow-up were observed between the two groups (P = 0.487, P = 0.876). Complications observed in group NL with one patient occurred cubital tunnel syndrome 3 months after the operation, the patient underwent ulnar nerve simple neurolysis and the symptoms were relieved after 3 weeks.

CONCLUSION

For patients with elbow PMRI, satisfactory functional outcomes can be yielded with non-repair of the LUCL as long as the stable elbow joint is performed during operation.

Posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow: What the radiologist needs to know

Varus posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow joint is a relatively new subject described for the first time in 2003. It occurs secondary to axial loading of the elbow with varus force and internal rotation of the forearm. There is usually a specific pattern of osseous and soft tissue injuries that can be recognized on imaging. This includes an anteromedial coronoid fracture and avulsion of the lateral collateral ligament complex from its humeral attachment. Ulnar collateral ligament complex injury is also reported, particularly its posterior bundle which plays an important role in posteromedial elbow joint stability. There is high incidence of early osteoarthritis secondary to the resultant varus instability and increased contact pressure at the ulnohumeral joint. Surgical fixation of the coronoid fracture and ligamentous reconstruction maybe indicated to prevent this recurrent instability. The article reviews the key radiological features of posteromedial rotatory instability with multiple examples from different imaging modalities. The relevant anatomy of the elbow joint stabilising structures will be illustrated, in particular the coronoid process anatomy and the O'Driscoll classification for coronoid process fractures. Radiologists should be familiar with the imaging findings of posteromedial rotatory instability.

Acute elbow dislocation: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and intra-operative finding of ligament injury

PURPOSE

The aim of this current study was to assess elbow ligament tears after dislocation using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to correlate any pre-operative imaging with intra-operative findings of elbow ligament tears.

METHODS

We prospectively included 32 patients with acute elbow dislocation investigated by MRI at a means of five days from dislocation. A simple elbow dislocation was diagnosed in 14 patients (44%); associated bone injuries were identified in 18 elbows (56%). Surgical repair of elbow ligaments was carried out in 23 patients, and nine cases were treated non-operatively. A blinded MRI evaluation of all 32 elbows was performed by an orthopaedic surgeon (rater 1) and a musculoskeletal radiologist (rater 2).

RESULTS

Inter-rater agreement for MRI evaluation of 32 was poor for lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) tears, fair for radial collateral ligament (RCL), moderate for annular ligament (AL), and fair for ulnar collateral ligament (UCL). All tears were reported as complete by rater 1; 13/32 partial tears were identified by rater 2 (LUCL = 2, RCL = 2, UCL = 9). Correlation between surgical and MRI findings showed good inter-rater agreement for LUCL and AL tears in both raters. Agreement for RCL tear was poor for rater 1 and fair for rater 2; agreement for UCL tear was fair for rater 1 and poor for rater 2. Intra-operative findings showed ten radial head fractures (RHFs) and ten coronoid fractures (CFs). LUCL tears were found in the four cases of type II RHFs and in 3/4 cases of CFs. Bone injuries and ligament tears were not significantly associated.

CONCLUSION

MRI scan supported surgeons to identify soft tissue injuries and to address the most suitable surgical approach after acute elbow dislocation. Inter-observer agreement for intra-operative findings was high for LCL complex injuries and poor for UCL.