Does the timing of surgical intervention impact the clinical outcomes and overall duration of symptoms in frozen shoulder?

Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds Following Arthroscopic Capsular Release for the Treatment of Idiopathic Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis

PURPOSE

To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) threshold for the visual analog scale (VAS), Constant, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores following arthroscopic capsular release for the treatment of idiopathic shoulder adhesive capsulitis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospective collected data was performed in patients undergoing arthroscopic capsular release for the treatment of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis at a single institution from January 2018 through January 2019. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected preoperatively and 6 months' postoperatively. Delta was defined as the change between preoperative and 6 months' postoperative scores. Distribution-based and anchored-based (response to a satisfaction question at 1 year) approaches were used to estimate MCIDs and PASS, respectively. The optimal cut-off point where sensitivity and specificity were maximized (Youden index) and the percentage of patients achieving those thresholds were also calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, a total of 100 patients without diabetes who underwent arthroscopic capsular release and completed baseline and 6-month patient-reported outcome measures were included. The distribution-based MCID for VAS, Constant, SANE, and ASES were calculated to be 1.1, 10.1, 9.3, and 8.2, respectively. The rate of patients who achieved MCID thresholds was 98% for VAS, 96% for Constant, 98% for SANE, and 99% for ASES. The PASS threshold values for VAS, Constant, and ASES were ≤2, ≥70, ≥80, and ≥80, respectively. The rate of patients who achieved PASS thresholds was 84% for VAS, 84% for Constant, 89% for SANE, and 78% for ASES.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients without diabetes and idiopathic adhesive capsulitis, high rates of MCID and PASS thresholds can be achieved with arthroscopic anteroinferior capsular release LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

Improvements in Sleep After Shoulder Arthroscopy Are Correlated With Improvements in Various Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Purpose

To determine the prevalence of sleep disturbances in patients before and after arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder and to evaluate the association between patient-reported outcomes and standardized sleep disturbance tools after shoulder arthroscopy.

Methods

A systematic review, following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines, was conducted by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases using the terms "arthroscopic surgery" and "sleep." Two independent reviewers evaluated the studies based on the inclusion criteria focused on the effects of shoulder arthroscopy on sleep disturbance and the use of outcome measures related to sleep. Data on sleep quality and functional outcomes were collected and analyzed using various assessment tools, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. The methodologic quality of included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.

Results

The review included 15 studies (9 Level IV, 5 Level III, and 1 Level II) comprising 1,818 arthroscopic patients (average age, 57.4 ± 8.86 years; follow-up range, 6 months to 75.7 months). The prevalence rates of sleep disturbances before and after shoulder arthroscopy ranged from 75.8% to 100% and from 19% to 62%, respectively. Every study included in this analysis reported an improvement in rates of sleep disturbances postoperatively compared with preoperatively. Improvements in standardized sleep disturbance scores were associated with functional outcomes.

Conclusions

Sleep disturbances are commonly observed before and after arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder. Arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder appears to improve sleep quality, and surgeons can expect functional outcomes, specifically the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test score, numeric rating scale or visual analog scale score, and Constant-Murley score, to improve in line with sleep quality.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level II to IV studies.

Effect of surgical timing in outcomes in Hispanic patients after arthroscopic capsular release in diabetic and idiopathic adhesive capsulitis

Background

Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder is a painful and debilitating condition. While the majority of patients improve with conservative treatment, those who do not improve require surgery such as arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) for symptom relief. However, there is limited literature regarding the optimal timeframe to proceed with surgery.

Methods

This retrospective cohort evaluated 134 Hispanic patients who underwent ACR for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. Patients were divided into an early and a delayed treatment group that included all patients. Patients were then divided into diabetic and idiopathic subgroups. Early vs. delayed treatment outcomes (forward flexion, external rotation, Visual Analog Scale pain scores, and recurrence requiring reoperation) were assessed in all patients and in each subgroup.

Results

No statistically significant differences were found between the early and delayed release groups in postoperative forward flexion, external rotation, pain intensity scores, and recurrence requiring reoperation at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months of follow-up in the all-patient group. In the idiopathic frozen shoulder subgroup, no significant differences were observed in postoperative forward flexion, external rotation, pain intensity scores, and recurrence requiring reoperation at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months of follow-up. In the diabetic frozen shoulder subgroup, no significant differences were observed in postoperative forward flexion, external rotation, pain intensity scores, and recurrence requiring reoperation at 1 month and 6 months of follow-up visits.

Conclusions

There was no difference in outcomes following ACR for adhesive capsulitis between patients who underwent early release vs. delayed release. There were no significant differences in outcomes between early and delayed arthroscopic release in patients with a history of diabetes mellitus.

Comparing surgical outcomes of anterior capsular release vs circumferential release for persistent capsular stiffness

Purpose

To consolidate the existing literature evaluating anterior capsular release and circumferential capsular release in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis (AC) of the shoulder.

Methods

The electronic databases PUBMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched from data inception to October 8, 2020. Data are presented descriptively where appropriate. A meta-analysis was conducted for patient-reported outcomes.

Results

Overall, there were forty-six articles included. The majority of patients underwent circumferential release compared to anterior release (80.1% vs. 19.9%). Concomitant Manipulation Under Anesthesia (MUA) was employed in 25 studies, with a higher occurrence in the anterior compared to the circumferential release group (70% vs 60%). Both groups experienced significant improvements postoperatively in range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcomes. Complication rates were low for both anterior release (0.67%) and 360° release (0.44%).

Conclusion

Both anterior and circumferential release are effective techniques for treating AC with low complication rates. Future studies should improve documentation of patient demographics, surgical techniques and outcomes to determine an individualized treatment protocol for patients.

Level of evidence

Level IV, Systematic Review of Level I-IV studies.

Trends in Practice Among Shoulder Specialists in the Management of Frozen Shoulder: A Consensus Survey

Background:

The management of frozen shoulder (FS) differs depending on experience level and variation between scientific guidelines and actual practice.

Purpose:

To determine the current trends and practices in the management of FS among shoulder specialists and compare them with senior shoulder specialists.

Study Design:

Consensus statement.

Methods:

A team of 15 senior shoulder specialists (faculty group) prepared a questionnaire comprising 26 questions regarding the definition, terminology, clinical signs, investigations, management, and prognosis of FS. The questionnaire was mailed to all the registered shoulder specialists of Shoulder and Elbow Society, India (SESI) (specialist group; n = 230), as well as to the faculty group (n = 15). The responses of the 2 groups were compared, and levels of consensus were determined: strong (>75%), broad (60%-74.9%), inconclusive (40%-59.9%), or disagreement (<40%).

Result:

Overall, 142 of the 230 participants in the specialist group and all 15 participants in the faculty group responded to the survey. Both groups strongly agreed that plain radiographs are required to rule out a secondary cause of FS, routine magnetic resonance imaging is not indicated to confirm FS, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be administered at bedtime, steroid injection (triamcinolone or methylprednisolone) is the next best option if analgesics fail to provide pain relief, passive physical therapy should be avoided in the freezing phase, <10% of patients would require any surgical intervention, and patients with diabetes and thyroid dysfunction tend to fare poorly. There was broad agreement that routine thyroid dysfunction screening is unnecessary for women, a single 40-mg steroid injection via intra-articular route is preferred, and arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) results in a better outcome than manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). Agreement was inconclusive regarding the use of combined random blood sugar (RBS) and glycosylated hemoglobin versus lone RBS to screen for diabetes in patients with FS, preference of ACR versus MUA to treat resistant FS, and the timing of surgical intervention. There was disagreement over the most appropriate term for FS, the preferred physical therapy modality for pain relief, the most important movement restriction for early diagnosis of FS, and complications seen after MUA.

Conclusion:

This survey summarized the trend in prevalent practices regarding FS among the shoulder specialists and senior shoulder surgeons of SESI.

Ultrasound Guıded Multisıte Injectıon Technıque in the Treatment of Frozen Shoulder

Frozen shoulder (FS) is an elusive condition that affects patients' mental and emotional quality of their lives. Corticosteroid injection technique is one of the first-line treatment methods in the treatment of FS. Ultrasound (USG) guidance allows visualization of the shoulder anatomy and improves the accuracy of the injection site. This study describes an USG-guided injection technique for FS treatment. The aim of this technique was to affect glenohumeral joint and capsule, subacromial space, the long head of biceps tendon sheath, and the coracohumeral ligament. For this purpose, four different sites were injected by USG guidance. Patients with FS can be effectively treated through this technique that is detailed in this article.

Surgical versus Nonsurgical Multimodality Treatment in an Idiopathic Frozen Shoulder: A Retrospective Study of Clinical and Functional Outcomes

This retrospective study compared the clinical and functional outcomes of patients diagnosed with an idiopathic frozen shoulder with symptom onset of a maximum of six months, treated by arthroscopic capsular release followed by corticosteroid injection and physiotherapy to patients who received only corticosteroid injection followed by physiotherapy. The patients who underwent arthroscopic capsular release, intraoperative corticosteroid injection, and physiotherapy (Group I, n = 30) or received only corticosteroids injection and physiotherapy (Group II, n = 29) were examined in terms of shoulder range of motion (ROM), pain intensity, and function before a given treatment and three, six, and twelve months later. The groups were comparable pre-treatment in terms of ROM, pain, and functional outcome. Group I had statistically and clinically significantly better ROM and function at three and six months post-treatment than Group II. Despite being statistically significant, the between-group differences at twelve-month follow-up in ROM and function were too small to be considered clinically notable. The between-group comparison of pain revealed no significant differences at any post-treatment point of time. The early arthroscopic capsular release preceding corticosteroid injection and physiotherapy seemed more effective at three- and six-month follow-up; however, it brought a comparable result to corticosteroid injection and subsequent physiotherapy at twelve months follow-up.