1
|
Chin PYK, Regan W, Plausinis D, Zarzour Z, Leung F, Johnston K, Lim B, Sasyniuk T. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal-backed vs. cemented polyethylene glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty: 5-year results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:1004-1016. [PMID: 38286183 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previously, we reported early (2-year) findings from a randomized controlled trial comparing a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal-backed (TM) glenoid vs. cemented polyethylene glenoid (POLY) in patients undergoing a total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of the current study is to report disease-specific quality of life, clinical, patient-reported, and radiographic outcomes at midterm (5-year) from this trial. METHODS Five surgeons from 3 centers participated. Patients 18-79 years with a primary diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis were screened for eligibility. Randomization to an uncemented TM or cemented POLY glenoid was performed intra-operatively after adequate bone stock was confirmed. Study intervals were baseline, 2- and 5-year postoperative. The primary outcome was the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Shoulder (WOOS) quality of life score. Secondary outcomes included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, EuroQol-5 Dimensions, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey scores and clinical and radiographic examinations. Radiographic images were reviewed for metal debris according to Endrizzi. Mixed effects repeated measures analysis of variance for within- and between-group comparisons were performed. RESULTS Of the 104 patients who consented, 93 were randomized (46 TM; 47 POLY). There were no differences between groups at baseline (TM: mean age 66.5 years [standard deviation (SD) 6.4], 24 male and 22 female; and POLY: mean age 68.4 years [SD 5.5], 23 male / 24 female). Mean (SD) WOOS scores at baseline and 2 and 5 years were as follows: TM, 32 (21), 92 (13), and 93 (11); POLY, 27 (15), 93 (11), and 93 (10), respectively. No statistical or clinically relevant differences were noted with patient-reported outcomes between groups. Metal debris was observed in 11 (23.9%) patients, but outcomes were not negatively impacted, and debris severity was minor (grades 1 and 2). Complication rates were similar between groups (TM: 7 of 46 [15.2%], and POLY: 8 of 47 [17.0%]; P = .813). No aseptic glenoid failures were reported, but 1 patient in the TM group required revision because of infection. CONCLUSIONS Our short-term (2-year) findings were maintained with longer follow-up. At 5 years postoperation, there were no statistically or clinically significant differences between an uncemented second-generation TM glenoid and a cemented polyethylene glenoid with respect to disease-specific quality of life or patient-reported outcomes. No glenoid implant failures were reported, and complication rates were similar between groups. Only one complication was glenoid related (1 infection in the TM group). Metal debris was observed in 23.9% of patients with a TM glenoid but did not negatively influence implant survival, patient-reported outcomes, or shoulder function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Y K Chin
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - William Regan
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Derek Plausinis
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Zane Zarzour
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Family Medicine, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Fay Leung
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kayla Johnston
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Brendan Lim
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Treny Sasyniuk
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Italia K, Jomaa M, Pareyon R, Hollman F, Cutbush K, Gupta A. Outcomes and survivorship of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: current concepts. J ISAKOS 2023; 8:284-288. [PMID: 37100117 DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has been the gold standard of care for end-stage glenohumeral arthritis. Outcomes are varied and have been affected by both patient and implant characteristics. Patient factors, such as age, preoperative diagnosis, and preoperative glenoid morphology, can affect the outcomes after TSA. Similarly, the different glenoid and humeral component designs significantly affect the survivorship of TSA. Significant evolution has occurred in the design of the glenoid component with the aim of decreasing the glenoid-sided causes of failure in TSA. On the other hand, focus on the humeral component has been increasing as well, with a trend towards using shorter humeral stems. This article aims to look at the outcomes of TSA as affected by the various patient characteristics and design options for the glenoid and the humeral components. This review also aims to compare survivorship data from global literature and the Australian joint replacement registry and to provide insights into the implant combination that may provide the best patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine Italia
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia.
| | - Mohammad Jomaa
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia; Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, 4120, Australia; St Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia
| | - Roberto Pareyon
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia; Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, 4120, Australia; St Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia
| | - Freek Hollman
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia; Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, 4120, Australia; St Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia
| | - Kenneth Cutbush
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia; St Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia
| | - Ashish Gupta
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia; Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, 4120, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Valsamis EM, Beard D, Carr A, Collins GS, Brealey S, Rangan A, Santos R, Corbacho B, Rees JL, Pinedo-Villanueva R. Mapping the Oxford Shoulder Score onto the EQ-5D utility index. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:507-518. [PMID: 36169788 PMCID: PMC9911508 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03262-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In order to enable cost-utility analysis of shoulder pain conditions and treatments, this study aimed to develop and evaluate mapping algorithms to estimate the EQ-5D health index from the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) when health outcomes are only assessed with the OSS. METHODS 5437 paired OSS and EQ-5D questionnaire responses from four national multicentre randomised controlled trials investigating different shoulder pathologies and treatments were split into training and testing samples. Separate EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L analyses were undertaken. Transfer to utility (TTU) regression (univariate linear, polynomial, spline, multivariable linear, two-part logistic-linear, tobit and adjusted limited dependent variable mixture models) and response mapping (ordered logistic regression and seemingly unrelated regression (SUR)) models were developed on the training sample. These were internally validated, and their performance evaluated on the testing sample. Model performance was evaluated over 100-fold repeated training-testing sample splits. RESULTS For the EQ-5D-3L analysis, the multivariable linear and splines models had the lowest mean square error (MSE) of 0.0415. The SUR model had the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.136. Model performance was greatest in the mid-range and best health states, and lowest in poor health states. For the EQ-5D-5L analyses, the multivariable linear and splines models had the lowest MSE (0.0241-0.0278) while the SUR models had the lowest MAE (0.105-0.113). CONCLUSION The developed models now allow accurate estimation of the EQ-5D health index when only the OSS responses are available as a measure of patient-reported health outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Epaminondas M. Valsamis
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LD UK
| | - David Beard
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LD UK
| | - Andrew Carr
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LD UK
| | - Gary S. Collins
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LD UK
| | - Stephen Brealey
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Department of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Amar Rangan
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Department of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Rita Santos
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Belen Corbacho
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Department of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Jonathan L. Rees
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LD UK
| | - Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LD UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Murphy J, Todd E, Wright MA, Murthi AM. Evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty with inset Trabecular Metal-backed glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:971-977. [PMID: 34774775 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trabecular Metal (TM)-backed glenoid implants were introduced for their theoretical ability to increase osseointegration while minimizing wear and the risk of loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Initial follow-up studies of TM-backed glenoids demonstrated high rates of metallic debris formation around the implant site, raising concerns about longevity. More recent data suggest that metallic debris formation may be less prevalent than previously reported and that the implants may have positive long-term outcomes regardless of debris. The goal of our study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes at mid-term follow-up of TSA using a TM-backed glenoid implant placed with full backside support using an inset technique. We hypothesized that our clinical and radiographic outcomes would be good using this technique. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 39 patients who underwent 41 TSA procedures with a Zimmer Biomet TM-backed glenoid component performed by a single surgeon between January 2010 and March 2016. After exclusions for death unrelated to surgery and loss to follow-up, 35 patients (37 shoulders) with minimum 2-year clinical follow-up were included in the study. The glenoids were all placed in an inset fashion with full backside support. Clinical, patient-reported, and radiographic outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS The average follow-up period was 7.2 years (range, 2-11 years). At final follow-up, average shoulder elevation was 153° ± 22° and average external rotation was 53° ± 12°. The average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 86.8 ± 19.0, and the average visual analog scale score was 1.3 ± 2.4. Metallic debris was found in 9 shoulders (27%), and radiolucency was observed around the glenoid components in 13 shoulders (39%) on the final postoperative radiographs. Metallic debris and radiolucency findings were low in severity, with average grades of 0.32 (standard deviation, 0.54) and 0.39 (standard deviation, 0.50), respectively. There were no reoperations. CONCLUSION This study of 37 shoulders undergoing TSA with a TM-backed glenoid demonstrated 100% implant survivorship at an average follow-up of 7 years. Clinical outcomes were excellent despite the occurrence of some metallic debris formation. The findings suggest that a TM-backed glenoid component implanted in an inset fashion to achieve full backside support can provide good clinical and patient-reported outcomes in TSA patients at mid-term follow-up and suggest that continued consideration of the role of TM-backed glenoids and the optimal technique for implantation may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Murphy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Evan Todd
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Melissa A Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anand M Murthi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shen X, Qin Y, Li Y, Tang X, Xiao J. Trabecular metal versus non-trabecular metal acetabular components for acetabular revision surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2022; 100:106597. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
6
|
Goodloe JB, Oldenburg KS, Toner S, Rabinowitz JM, Barfield WR, Eichinger JK, Friedman RJ. Comparison of press-fit versus peripherally cemented hybrid glenoid components in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: minimum 5-year follow-up. JSES Int 2021; 6:21-25. [PMID: 35141671 PMCID: PMC8811384 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A common complication of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) is aseptic glenoid loosening. Monoblock polyethylene glenoid components with backside ingrowth or on-growth utilize hybrid fixation, with cementation of the peripheral pegs and central ingrowth or on-growth of bone have been designed to decrease glenoid loosening. However, there is a paucity of midterm data comparing cementation of the peripheral peg holes versus all press-fit implantation for hybrid glenoid constructs. The purpose of this study is to compare the minimum five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes of a press-fit hybrid glenoid component with a peripherally cemented hybrid glenoid component in aTSA. Methods Between years 2013-2015, we reviewed a total of 169 patients who underwent primary aTSA, with follow-up data spanning a minimum of five years, from an international multi-institutional database. There were 61 press-fit and 108 peripherally cemented glenoids. Shoulders were evaluated for outcome measures, which included clinical outcome scores, radiographic outcomes, and complication rates. Results Postoperatively, there were no statistically significant differences in patient satisfaction, shoulder function, pain scoring, the Simple Shoulder Test, the Constant score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the University of California–Los Angeles score, nor the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, between the two cohorts. There were no significant differences in adverse events (P = .791) or revision rates (P = .592). At the final radiographic follow-up, there were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the incidence of radiolucent lines on the glenoid (P = .210) or humeral side (P = .282). Conclusion At a minimum of 5-year follow-up, aTSA with a press-fit glenoid implant demonstrates no difference in clinical or radiographic outcomes when compared with a glenoid cohort where the peripheral pegs are cemented. In addition, there is no increased rate of aseptic glenoid loosening or need for revision surgery between the two groups with a lower rate of radiolucency detected than prior midterm data studies. Uncemented press-fit glenoid fixation with a cage component appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for patients undergoing primary aTSA at a minimum of 5-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Richard J. Friedman
- Corresponding author: Richard J. Friedman, MD, FRCSC, Professor of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, CSB 708, MSC 622, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chin PYK, Regan WD, Plausinis D, Zarzour ZD, Leung F, Sasyniuk TM, Lim B, Sayre EC. Two-year results of a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial comparing a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal-backed versus cemented polyethylene glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty. Bone Jt Open 2021; 2:728-736. [PMID: 34488426 PMCID: PMC8479846 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.29.bjo-2021-0073.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims To report early (two-year) postoperative findings from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating disease-specific quality of life (QOL), clinical, patient-reported, and radiological outcomes in patients undergoing a total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal (TM) glenoid versus a cemented polyethylene glenoid (POLY) component. Methods Five fellowship-trained surgeons from three centres participated. Patients aged between 18 and 79 years with a primary diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis were screened for eligibility. Patients were randomized intraoperatively to either a TM or POLY glenoid component. Study intervals were: baseline, six weeks, six-, 12-, and 24 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Shoulder QOL score. Radiological images were reviewed for metal debris. Mixed effects repeated measures analysis of variance for within and between group comparisons were performed. Results A total of 93 patients were randomized (46 TM; 47 POLY). No significant or clinically important differences were found with patient-reported outcomes at 24-month follow-up. Regarding the glenoid components, there were no complications or revision surgeries in either group. Grade 1 metal debris was observed in three (6.5%) patients with TM glenoids at 24 months but outcomes were not negatively impacted. Conclusion Early results from this RCT showed no differences in disease-specific QOL, radiographs, complication rates, or shoulder function between uncemented second-generation TM and cemented POLY glenoids at 24 months postoperatively. Revision surgeries and reoperations were reported in both groups, but none attributed to glenoid implant failure. At 24 months postoperatively, Grade 1 metal debris was found in 6.5% of patients with a TM glenoid but did not negatively influence patient-reported outcomes. Longer-term follow-up is needed and is underway. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):728–736.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Zane D Zarzour
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,The University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
| | - Fay Leung
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Brendan Lim
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|