Return to work following distal triceps repair

[Surgical treatment of distal triceps tendon ruptures]

OBJECTIVE

Restoration of the anatomy and the original length of the muscle-tendon unit in triceps tendon ruptures.

INDICATIONS

Acute and chronic triceps tendon ruptures with persisting symptoms and significant strength deficits.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Infections and tumors in the surgical area.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Prone position. Skin incision over the distal triceps in a lateral direction around the olecranon. Mobilization of the tendon and débridement of the olecranon. Drilling of 2 × 2.9 mm suture anchor holes medial and lateral into the footprint of the olecranon. In addition, drilling through the olecranon 12 mm distal to the tip of the olecranon and transosseous introduction of 4 sutures. Then the suture anchors (all-suture or titanium anchors) are inserted into the drill holes. Refix the deep and superficial tendons with the anchor threads. Refix the upper tendon portions with the transosseous sutures. In the case of chronic lesions, a graft interposition is necessary.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Dorsal 10 ° splint, then change to an orthosis fixed in 20 ° extension and passive mobility 0-30 ° flexion for 6 weeks. From the 7th week onwards, load-free, physiotherapeutically controlled increasing mobilization. Starting weight-loading from the 13th week on. Full load after 6 months.

RESULTS

In all, 34 male strength athletes with acute triceps tendon rupture underwent surgery using the hybrid technique described and were prospectively recorded. The MEPS‑G score averaged 94.7 points, there were no permanent limitations in mobility, and the postoperative strength ability averaged 94% of the original strength performance ability. The return to sport achieved 100%. The complication rate was 20.6%. Reconstruction of the distal triceps tendon using hybrid technology leads to very good functional results. Half of all patients complained of symptoms even before the rupture, which suggests previous damage to the distal triceps tendon caused by degeneration.

Surgical repair of distal triceps rupture: a systematic review of outcomes and complications

Background

Triceps tendon injury is rare and accounts for only 2% of all tendinous injuries. It typically occurs after trauma or physical strain with eccentric loading. Treatment involves surgical repair, commonly with either transosseous bone tunnels or suture anchors. Nonsurgical management is typically reserved for low-demand or high-risk patients, as this is associated with deficits in strength and functional disability. Despite several recent high-quality observational studies that have added to our understanding of outcomes after surgical repair, we are not aware of a systematic review that includes literature published after 2015. In addition, prior reviews did not compare outcomes between different surgical repair methods, particularly transosseous bone tunnel and suture anchor techniques.

Methods

This systematic review examines published literature between January 1970 and May 2021 in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to further examine reported functional outcomes and compare those outcomes between the two surgical repair methods.

Results

Our literature search yielded 309 results, of which only 16 met inclusion criteria. At the latest follow-up, the mean Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 4, the mean Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 8, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 92, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow score was 99, the mean modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 94, the mean Oxford Elbow Score was 43, and the mean isokinetic muscle strength testing was 87%. A very high percentage (95%) of patients reported being satisfied with the repair. Preinjury levels of function were achieved in 92% of patients, and 100% regained at least a score of 4 of 5 for gross muscle strength. Complications occurred in 15% of cases, of which retears accounted for 5%. Subanalysis of cases with reported repair types revealed a significantly higher overall complication rate with transosseous repairs than with suture anchor repairs (18% vs. 8%, P = .008) as well as a higher retear rate in the transosseous repair group (7% vs. 2%, P = .03).

Conclusion

Patient-reported outcome measures were favorable for both suture anchor and transosseous tunnel repair methods. Suture anchor repair showed significantly better results with regard to isokinetic strength testing, complication rates, and retear rates. Further study is needed to establish superiority of either technique and cost-efficacy. In light of the evidence supporting greater biomechanical strength and lower clinical rates of failure, surgeons may consider use of a suture anchor technique for repair of distal triceps ruptures.

High Rate of Return to Work by 3 Months Following Latarjet for Anterior Shoulder Instability

PURPOSE

To evaluate the rate and duration of return to work in patients undergoing Latarjet for failed soft-tissue stabilization or glenoid bone loss.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing Latarjet from 2005 to 2015 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Patients completed a standardized and validated work questionnaire, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index Survey, and a satisfaction survey.

RESULTS

Of 89 eligible patients who had Latarjet, 67 patients (75.3%) responded to the questionnaire, of whom 51 patients (76.1%) were employed within 3 years before surgery (mean age: 29.9 ± 11.8 years; mean follow-up: 54.6 ± 11.9 months) and had an average glenoid bone loss of 14.5 ± 6.1%. Fifty patients (98.0%) returned to work by 2.7 ± 3.0 months postoperatively; 45 patients (88.2%) patients returned to the same level of occupational intensity. Those who held sedentary, light, moderate, or heavy intensity occupations returned to their previous occupation at a rate of 100.0%, 93.3%, 90.0%, and 66.7% (P = .2) at a duration of 1.2 ± 1.6 months, 1.8 ± 1.9 months, 3.1 ± 3.5 months, and 6.5 ± 4.1 months (P = .001), respectively. The average postoperative Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score was 70.9 ± 34.2. Fifty patients (98.0%) noted at least "a little improvement" in their quality of life following surgery, with 35 patients (68.6%) noting great improvement. Furthermore, 49 patients (96.1%) reported being satisfied with their procedure, with 25 patients (49.0%) reporting being very satisfied. Four patients (7.8%) returned to the operating room, with 1 patient (2.0%) requiring arthroscopic shoulder stabilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 98% of patients who underwent Latarjet returned to work by 2.7 ± 3.0 months postoperatively. Patients with greater-intensity occupations had a longer duration of absence before returning to their preoperative level of occupational intensity. Information regarding return to work is imperative in preoperative patient consultation to manage expectations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, case series.

The surgical management of distal triceps tendon ruptures: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Distal triceps tendon ruptures (DTTRs) are highly uncommon injuries and can be treated with surgical repair. The purpose of this review was to compare the outcomes and complications of various surgical techniques used for primary repair of DTTRs.

METHODS

The electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and PubMed were searched from data inception to October 15, 2020. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies tool was used to assess study quality. Data are presented descriptively.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies were identified, comprising 560 patients (565 triceps tendons), of whom 78.6% were male patients. The mean age was 46.1 ± 8.4 years, and the mean follow-up period was 31.8 ± 21.0 months. The overall complication rate across all DTTR repair procedures was 14.9%. The distribution of complications for each technique was 29.2% for the direct repair technique, 15.2% for the transosseous technique (transosseous suture), and 7.7% for the suture anchor technique. Common complications include ulnar neuropathies, infections, and pain. The overall rerupture rate for transosseous suture, suture anchor, and direct repair was 4.3% (n = 12), 2.1% (n = 3), and 0% (n = 0), respectively. Patients undergoing DTTR repair experience significant improvements postoperatively regarding pain, strength, and range of motion.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing DTTR experience improvements in postoperative outcomes; however, there is a moderate reported risk of rerupture or complication. Owing to the heterogeneity in rupture patterns, surgical procedures, and outcome measures, it is difficult to ascertain the superiority of one surgical technique over another. Future studies should use large prospective cohorts and long-term follow-up to determine more accurate complication rates and outcome scores.

Return to Work After Pectoralis Major Repair

Background:

Pectoralis major repair (PMR) is an infrequent injury that occurs during resistance training, most commonly during the eccentric phase of muscle contraction. As the incidence of weight training continues to increase, it is important to understand the outcomes after PMR.

Purpose:

To evaluate the rate and duration of return to work in patients undergoing PMR.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Consecutive patients undergoing PMR from 2010 to 2016 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. Patients completed a standardized and validated work questionnaire, as well as a visual analog scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons survey, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation, and a satisfaction survey.

Results:

Of the 60 eligible patients who had a PMR, 49 (81.7%) were contacted at the final follow-up. Of the 49 patients, 46 (93.9%) had been employed within 3 years before surgery (mean ± SD age, 40.4 ± 8.2 years; follow-up, 3.9 ± 2.8 years). Of these, 45 (97.8%) returned to work by 1.6 ± 2.1 months postoperatively, and 41 (89.1%) returned to the same level of occupational intensity. Patients who held sedentary, light-, medium-, or high-intensity occupations returned to work at a rate of 100.0%, 100.0%, 83.3%, and 66.7% by 0.8 ± 1.0, 0.8 ± 1.0, 1.3 ± 2.7, and 3.3 ± 2.7 months, respectively. Five of 6 patients (83.3%) with workers’ compensation returned to their previous occupations by 5.0 ± 1.6 months, while 100% of those without workers’ compensation returned to work by 1.1 ± 1.7 months (P < .001). Overall, 44 patients (95.7%) were satisfied with the procedure, and 40 (87.0%) would have the operation again if presented the opportunity. A single patient (2.2%) required revision PMR.

Conclusion:

Approximately 98% of patients who underwent PMR returned to work by 1.6 ± 2.1 months postoperatively. Patients with higher-intensity occupations took longer to return to their preoperative levels of occupational intensity. Information regarding return to work is imperative in preoperative patient consultation to manage expectations.

Return to sport and weightlifting analysis following distal biceps tendon repair

BACKGROUND

Rupture of the distal biceps tendon is an increasingly frequent injury sustained predominantly by middle-aged men. Despite the prevalence of sport in this age group, little is known regarding return to sport outcomes following surgery.

METHODS

Patients undergoing distal biceps tendon repair (DBR) between January 2015 and January 2017 were contacted electronically via e-mail and via telephone to administer a previously validated and standard return to sport survey. Patients self-reported preinjury and current level of sport and activity as well as preinjury and current level of select weightlifts.

RESULTS

A total of 77 of 124 patients were available for follow-up (62.1%). Of these patients, 61 endorsed preoperative sport and were included for analysis. Average follow-up was 38.7 ± 6.7 months. The mean age at surgery was 47.5 ± 8.8 years, and the mean body mass index was 30.3 ± 5.1. The dominant side was affected in 25 of 61 cases. Of the 61 included patients, 57 (93.4%) were able to return to sport at any level (lower, same, or higher intensity than preinjury activity level). Forty of the patients (65.6%) were able to return to sport at same or higher intensity. Mean time to return to sport was 6.0 ± 2.8 months. Days from injury to surgery (odds ratio [OR] 0.999, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.998-0.999), suture anchor fixation in comparison to suture button (OR 0.602, 95% CI 0.427-0.850), and dominant-side surgery (OR 0.749, 95% CI 0.582-0.963) were associated with a decreased likelihood to return to sport at same or higher level of duty. Single-sided incision in comparison to double (OR 5.209, 95% CI 1.239-20.903) and dominant-side surgery (OR 6.370, 95% CI 1.639-24.762) were associated with increased duration to return to sport.

CONCLUSION

Distal biceps tendon rupture is a significant injury; however, patients can expect high levels of return to sport following DBR with some residual impairment compared with baseline. It is important to counsel patients on their expectations while taking into account the results of this study: that there will be a small but appreciable decrease in strength compared with preinjury levels.