The critical shoulder angle does not change over time: a radiographic study

The Critical Shoulder Angle: A Significant Radiological Measure in Rotator Cuff vs. Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis in Chilean Patients-A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Shoulder pain is one of the most important musculoskeletal conditions affecting the upper extremities. Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) and rotator cuff injuries (RCIs) are notable for their high prevalence. The critical shoulder angle (CSA) is a significant radiological measure for determining the diagnosis and progression of patients with these conditions. Although there are reports in the international literature about this measure, in our country, guideline values considering these two pathologies are unknown. Objective: Our objective was to assess patients diagnosed with GHOA and RCI using an AP X-ray view and the CSA. Methods: To conduct this, we identified differences between sexes and age categories. Fifty-nine adult patients with GHOA and RCI were included. CSA grades varied depending on the age category and type of injury evaluated. Results: Significant differences between the age ranges of 40 and 54 (p = 0.05), 55-69 (p = 0.001), and 70-84 (p = 0.017) were observed. Conclusions: Patients with RCI tended to be younger and have a higher CSA compared to those with GHOA. It is important to have more normative values and to continue monitoring the critical shoulder angle in these patients.

Acromial Morphology Does Not Correlate with Age at Time of Rotator Cuff Tear: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine if scapular anatomy differs between younger and older patients with atraumatic full-thickness supraspinatus tears.

Methods

The critical shoulder angle, acromial index and lateral acromial angle were measured on standardized radiographs of two groups of patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of full-thickness degenerative supraspinatus tears. Group 1 included 61 patients under the age of 50 years while Group 2 included 45 patients over the age of 70 years. The mean critical shoulder angle, acromial index, and lateral acromial angle were then compared.

Results

There was no significant difference between groups for the critical shoulder angle (p = .433), acromial index (p = .881) or lateral acromial angle (p = .263). Interobserver reliability for critical shoulder angle, acromial index, and lateral acromial angle was nearly perfect (interclass correlation coefficient 0.996, 0.996, 0.998, respectively). No significant correlation existed between age and critical shoulder angle (p = .309), acromial index (p = .484) or lateral acromial angle (p = .685).

Discussion

While the critical shoulder angle and acromial index were found to be high and in the typical range for patients with rotator cuff tears in both groups, there were no significant differences in acromial morphology between Groups 1 and 2.

Evaluation of the prognostic value of the anatomical characteristics of the bony structures in the shoulder in bursal-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears

Background

In recent studies, individual scapular anatomy has been found to be related to degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tears. However, research on the relationship between the anatomical characteristics of shoulder radiographs and bursal-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) is limited, and the risk factors for this pathology still need to be determined.

Methods

The bursal-sided PTRCTs group included 102 patients without a history of shoulder trauma who underwent arthroscopy between January 2021 and October 2022. A total of 102 demographically matched outpatients with intact rotator cuffs were selected as the control group. Radiographs were used to measure the lateral acromial angle (LAA), critical shoulder angle (CSA), greater tuberosity angle (GTA), β-angle, acromion index (AI), acromiohumeral distance (AHD), acromial tilt (AT), acromial slope (AS), acromial type, and acromial spur by two independent observers. Multivariate analyses of these data were used to identify potential risk factors for bursal-sided PTRCTs. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of CSA, GTA, and AI for this type of pathology.

Result

The β-angle, AHD, AS and acromion type showed no difference between bursal-sided PTRCTs and controls (p = 0.009, 0.200, 0.747 and 0.078, respectively). CSA, GTA and AI were significantly higher in bursal-sided PTRCTs (p < 0.001). LAA, β-angle and AT were significantly lower in bursal-sided PTRCTs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated significant correlations between the acromial spur (p = 0.024), GTA (p = 0.004), CSA (p = 0.003) and AI (p = 0.048) and bursal-sided PTRCTs. The areas under the ROC curves for AI, CSA, and GTA were 0.655 (95% CI 0.580-0.729), 0.714 (95% CI 0.644-0.784), and 0.695 (95% CI 0.622-0.767), respectively.

Conclusion

Acromial spur, GTA, CSA, and AI were independent risk factors for bursal-sided PTRCTs. Furthermore, CSA was the most powerful predictor of bursal-sided PTRCTs compared to GTA and AI.

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Shoulder impingement is the most common diagnosis for shoulder pain. Shoulder impingement syndrome has been scrutinized as a misleading "umbrella" term, due to its vague and nonspecific context. It is better subcategorized into subacromial, internal, and subcoracoid impingement. The evaluation and treatment algorithm for each is grossly similar. A thorough history, focused physical examination, and standard radiographs are the first steps. Advanced imaging with MRI or ultrasound may be useful. The mainstay of treatment includes physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medications, and injections. Surgical treatment is reserved for refractory cases, and includes decompression, debridement, and/or repair of injured structures.

A prospective observational case control study investigating the coronal plane scapular morphological differences in full-thickness posterosuperior cuff tears and primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis

INTRODUCTION

The critical shoulder angle (CSA) is a surrogate marker of the coronal plane morphology of the scapula. CSA differences between scapulae could be due to differences in glenoid inclination (GI) or the location of the most lateral part of the acromion relative to the inferior glenoid, or both. An understanding of the hierarchy of the scapular morphological changes associated with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) and rotator cuff (RC) tears would allow accurate biomechanical modeling.

METHODS

A prospective observational case control study was undertaken in which the GI, "nonglenoid"-CSA, acromial vertical offset index, acromial horizontal offset index, acromial horizontal-vertical offset index, and coronal plane angulation of the acromion (CPAA-m) were measured on high-quality radiographs to compare coronal plane scapular anatomy in: (1) patients with asymptomatic atraumatic full-thickness RC tears, (2) patients with symptomatic primary GHOA, and (3) a control group with no RC tear or GHOA treated for glenohumeral instability or symptomatic labral pathology. Intraobserver reliability of the measurements was performed.

RESULTS

In the GHOA group, the GI was lower (less superiorly inclined) than the RC tear group (difference between the means: -4.8°, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-8.8°, -0.9°], P = .014) and the control group (difference between the means: -7.9°, 95% CI [-11.8°, -3.9°], P = .000); there was no difference in the acromial measurements. In the RC tear group, the nonglenoid-CSA was higher (difference between the means: 7.7°, 95% CI [3.0°, 12.3°], P = .001), the acromial vertical offset index was lower (difference between the means: -0.13, 95% CI [-0.24, -0.01], P = .026), and the acromial horizontal-vertical offset index was higher (difference between the means: 0.15, 95% CI [0.01, 0.28], P = .030) than the control group; there was no difference in the acromial horizontal offset index or the GI. The CPAA-m was lower (greater coronal plane downslope of the acromion) in both GHOA (difference between the means: -9.6°, 95% CI [-18.6°, -0.5°], P = .036) and RC tears (difference between the means: -9.9°, 95% CI [-19.0°, -0.9°], P = .029) compared with the control group. The intraclass correlation coefficients for intraobserver reliability demonstrated excellent reliability for the measurements (all >0.900).

DISCUSSION

Scapulae associated with GHOA have lower GI, but no spatial differences in the location of the lateral acromion compared with a normal population. Scapulae associated with RC tears have a lower vertical offset of the lateral acromion, but no difference in horizontal offset or GI compared with a normal population. The downslope of the acromion in the coronal plane is greater (lower CPAA-m) in both RC tears and GHOA than the normal population.

High Critical Shoulder Angle Values Are Associated With Full-Thickness Posterosuperior Cuff Tears and Low Values With Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

To compare critical shoulder angle (CSA) measurements using high-quality radiographs in the following groups: Group 1: symptomatic atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tears; Group 2: symptomatic primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA); and Group 3: no RC tear or primary GHOA being treated for glenohumeral instability or symptomatic labral pathology (control group).

METHODS

A prospective observational case control study with 10 shoulders in each group was performed GHOA and full-thickness RC tears were diagnosed by radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For these three groups, the exclusion criteria were the following: Group 1) partial thickness RC tears, traumatic RC tears, isolated subscapularis tears, and advanced cuff tear arthropathy with erosion of the superior glenoid; Group 2) secondary causes of glenohumeral arthritis; coexistent full-thickness RC tear; and Group 3) glenoid bone lesions that may affect the CSA measurement. Only shoulders with adequate radiographic quality (Suter-Henninger type A and C) were eligible. A one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey multiple pairwise-comparisons test, was performed to compare the groups. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC).

RESULTS

Mean CSA values were 37.4° ± 4.7 (RC tear group), 28.9° ± 2.4 (GHOA group), and 32.8° ± 1.1 (control group). The CSA of the RC group was higher than the control group (P = .006) and the GHOA group (P = .000). The CSA of the GHOA group was lower than the control group (P = .027). Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities for the CSA measurement were excellent (Observer 1 [ICC]: .986 [95% CI .970-.993]; Observer 2 [ICC]: .976[95% CI .951-.989]; and Observer 1v2: 0.968[95% CI .933-.985]).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a difference in the CSA between patients with symptomatic atraumatic full-thickness RC tears (4.6° higher than the control group), symptomatic GHOA (3.8° lower than the control group), and glenohumeral instability or labral pathology with no RC tear or GHOA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2, prospective observational case control diagnostic study.