Inter-rater agreement of rotator cuff tendon and muscle magnetic resonance imaging parameters evaluated preoperatively and during the first postoperative year following rotator cuff repair

A novel 3D MRI-based approach for assessing supraspinatus muscle length

Rotator cuff (RC) tears are a common source of pain and decreased shoulder strength. Muscle length is known to affect muscle strength, and therefore evaluating changes in supraspinatus muscle length associated with RC pathology, surgical repair, and post-operative recovery may provide insights into functional deficits. Our objective was to develop a reliable MRI-based approach for assessing supraspinatus muscle length. Using a new semi-automated approach for identifying 3D location of the muscle-tendon junction (MTJ), supraspinatus muscle length was calculated as the sum of MTJ distance (distance between 3D MTJ position and glenoid plane) and supraspinatus fossa length (distance between root of the scapular spine and glenoid plane). Inter- and intra-operator reliability of this technique were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and found to be excellent (ICCs > 0.96). Muscle lengths of 6 patients were determined before RC repair surgery and at 3- and 12-months post-surgery. Changes in normalized muscle length (muscle length as a percentage of pre-surgical muscle length) at 3 months post-surgery varied considerably across patients (16.1 % increase to 7.0 % decrease) but decreased in all patients from 3- to 12-months post-surgery (0.3 % to 17.2 %). This study developed a novel and reliable approach for quantifying supraspinatus muscle length and provided preliminary demonstration of its utility by assessing muscle length changes associated with RC pathology and surgical repair. Future studies can use this technique to evaluate changes over time in supraspinatus muscle length in response to clinical intervention, and associations between muscle length and shoulder function.

Editorial Commentary: Biologic Augmentation of Rotator Cuff Repair: Platelet-Rich Plasma May Be of Significant Benefit, Whereas Atelocollagen Cannot Be Recommended

The field of orthobiologics continues to advance at a rapid pace and theoretically holds some promise to augment the biologic healing response in rotator cuff repair (RCR). However, the clinical evidence for use of substances such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for RCR remains inconclusive. Atelocollagen, as a synthetic collagen substitute, has been proposed as another alternative to provide more collagen substrate for healing, but outcomes data with this technique is lacking. In contrast, (biologic) PRP has been well studied, does not show adverse outcomes, and has been shown to improve healing of large to massive tears, as well as RCR outcomes. As biologic augmentation options continue to push the envelope on indications, due diligence is required to carefully examine options for safety and efficacy. Evolutions in RCR should also continue to motivate sports medicine surgeons and researchers to seek out further innovations to improve patient outcomes. That said, PRP outcome improvement for RCR is not definitive and requires further study. RCR can humble even the best of surgeons and demands that we continue to look for ways to improve outcomes.

Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Criteria for the Preoperative Assessment of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the most common modality for assessment of the rotator cuff before and after surgery. Several classifications have been described aiming to define main tear characteristics. However, there is still confusion when it comes to the reliability of those classifications.

PURPOSE

(1) To identify all MR classifications available in the literature for preoperative assessment of rotator cuff tears, (2) to summarize available data on the reliability of identified classifications, and (3) to assess the methodological quality of reliability studies.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. All studies reporting MR assessment in patients with a superior or posterosuperior rotator cuff tear were included. After identification of the available MR criteria, reliability studies were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize findings. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies checklist.

RESULTS

A total of 75 studies were included in this review. Eight categories of outcomes could be identified. Of the total, 62 studies reported interobserver reliability whereas 32 reported intraobserver reliability of some of the identified criteria. Each category reflected a variety of reliability, ranging from poor to excellent agreement. MR proved to be a reliable imaging modality to detect the structural integrity of the posterosuperior cuff, especially in cases of full-thickness tear; it was also reliable in terms of tear width and length and muscle atrophy based on a tangent sign or Thomazeau classification. All other classifications did not prove acceptable reliability. Methodological quality was high for 23 articles and moderate for 14.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative MR is a reliable imaging modality to identify full-thickness tears, measure tear size and morphology, and identify muscle atrophy with tangent sign or Thomazeau classification. All other outcomes and classifications did not show acceptable reliability; therefore, caution is needed when using them for preoperative evaluation of a rotator cuff tear.

One-year patient-reported outcomes following primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair vary little by surgeon

Background

This study's purpose was to investigate the extent to which differences among operating surgeons may influence 1-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (RCR) surgery, after controlling for general and disease-specific patient factors. We hypothesized that surgeon would be additionally associated with 1-year PROMs, specifically the baseline to 1-year improvement in Penn Shoulder Score (PSS).

Methods

We used mixed multivariable statistical modeling to assess the influence of surgeon (and alternatively surgical case volume) on 1-year PSS improvement in patients undergoing RCR at a single health system in 2018, controlling for eight patient- and six disease-specific preoperative factors as possible confounders. Contributions of predictors to explaining variation in 1-year PSS improvement were measured and compared using Akaike's Information Criterion.

Results

518 cases performed by 28 surgeons met inclusion criteria, with median (quartiles) baseline PSS of 41.9 (31.9, 53.9) and 1-year PSS improvement of 42 (29.1, 55.3) points. Contrary to expectation, surgeon and surgical case volume were neither statistically significantly nor clinically meaningfully associated with 1-year PSS improvement. Baseline PSS and mental health status (VR-12 MCS) were the dominant and only statistically significant predictors of 1-year PSS improvement, with lower baseline PSS and higher VR-12 MCS predicting larger 1-year PSS improvement.

Conclusion

Patients generally reported excellent 1-year outcomes following primary RCR. This study did not find evidence that the individual surgeon or surgeon case volume influences 1-year PROMs, independently of case-mix factors, following primary RCR in a large employed hospital system.

High Acromial Slope and Low Acromiohumeral Distance Increase the Risk of Retear of the Supraspinatus Tendon After Repair

BACKGROUND

Retearing of the supraspinatus (SSP) tendon after repair is relatively common, but its cause is rarely clear. Although the role of acromion morphology and glenoid orientation in the pathogenesis of primary SSP tendon tears have frequently been analyzed, their association with the risk of rerupture of a repaired SSP tendon is poorly understood.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is acromial morphology associated with the risk of retear after SSP tendon repair? (2) Is there an association between inclination and version of the glenoid and the odds for retear of the SSP tendon after repair? (3) Are there differences in outcome scores between patients who had intact cuff repairs and those who had retears?

METHODS

Between August 2012 and December 2015, we treated 92 patients for SSP tendon tears; all of these patients were considered for inclusion in the present study. We considered patients with complete tear of the SSP that was reconstructed with a double-row repair and a minimum follow-up of 2 years as potentially eligible. Based on these criteria, 28% (26 of 92) were excluded because they had a partial rupture and did not receive a double-row reconstruction. A further 9% (eight of 92) were excluded because of missing planes or slices (such as sagittal, axial, or frontal) on MRI, and another 3% (three of 92) were lost before the minimum study follow-up interval or had incomplete datasets, leaving 60% (55 of 92) for inclusion in the present analysis. All included patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years; follow-up with MRI occurred at a mean duration of 2.3 ± 0.4 years postoperatively. All patients were asked to complete the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and Oxford Shoulder Scores, and they underwent MRI of the operated-on shoulder. Preoperative true AP radiographs and MR images of the affected shoulders were retrospectively assessed by measuring the acromiohumeral interval, critical shoulder angle, acromial slope, acromial tilt, acromial index, lateral acromial angle, and glenoid version and inclination. The patients also underwent acromioplasty, in which the underface of the acromion was flattened. To rule out any change in the above parameters because of acromioplasty, these parameters were compared using preoperative and postoperative MR images and showed no difference. In addition, the tendon integrity and quality on postoperative MRI were analyzed independently of one another by the same two observers using the Sugaya and Castricini classifications, accounting for atrophy and fatty degeneration of the SSP muscle. To assess interobserver reliability, the two observers took measurements independently from each other. They were orthopaedic residents who completed a training session before taking the measurements. All measurements had excellent intrarater (Cronbach alpha 0.996 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99 to 1.00; p > 0.01) and interrater (interrater correlation coefficient 0.975 [95% CI 0.97 to 0.98]; p > 0.01) reliabilities. To answer the study's first question, SSP integrity on postoperative MRI was compared with acromial morphologic parameters measured on preoperative AP radiographs and MR images. To answer the second question, the postoperative integrity and quality of the SSP tendon were correlated with glenoid inclination and glenoid version. To answer our third question, we compared outcome scores between patients with intact SSP tendons and those with reruptured SSP tendons. To investigate any correlation among the acromial morphology, glenoid orientation, and postoperative outcomes, a binomial logarithmic regression analysis was performed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine cutoff points for the radiologic parameters that showed a correlation in the binomial regression analysis.

RESULTS

After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as acromioplasty or preoperative fatty infiltration as well as muscle atrophy, the only morphological parameters associated with a higher risk (adjusted odds ratio) of SSP tendon rerupture were the acromiohumeral interval (adjusted OR 0.9 [95% CI 0.9 to 0.99]; p < 0.01) and acromial slope (adjusted OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.1 to 1.8]; p < 0.01). The critical shoulder angle, acromial tilt, acromial index, and lateral acromial angle were not associated with the risk of rerupture. The cutoff values for acromial slope and acromiohumeral interval were 24.5° and 7.4 mm, respectively. Patients with an acromiohumeral interval smaller than 7.4 mm or an acromial slope greater than 24.5° had higher odds (acromiohumeral interval: OR 11 [95% CI 2 to 46]; p = 0.01 and acromial slope: OR 9 [95% CI 2 to 46]; p = 0.04) for rerupture of the SSP. No difference was found between patients with intact SSP tendons and those with reruptured SSP tendons in terms of glenoid inclination (6° ± 4° versus 6° ± 3°, mean difference 0.8° [-1° to 3°]; p < 0.48) and glenoid version (-2° ± 3° versus -3° ± 3°, mean difference 1° [-1° to 3°]; p < 0.30). No difference was found between the intact and reruptured SSP groups regarding clinical outcomes (Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index: 98 ± 2 versus 97 ± 3, mean difference 0.73 [95% CI -0.30 to 0.31]; p = 0.96; Oxford Shoulder Score: 26 ± 13 versus 23 ± 10, mean difference 2.80 [95% CI -4.12 to 9.72]; p = 0.41).

CONCLUSION

The preoperative acromiohumeral interval and acromial slope are associated with SSP tendon rerupture after repair. Conversely, the critical shoulder angle, acromial tilt, lateral acromial angle, and acromial index had no association with the postoperative outcome. Additionally, glenoid inclination and version were not associated with the rerupture rate after SSP tendon repair. A detailed analysis of the acromiohumeral interval and acromial slope is recommended in clinical practice in patients undergoing SSP tendon repair. Surgeons should consider measuring the acromiohumeral interval and acromial slope preoperatively when performing SSP repair, especially in the context of planned acromioplasties. Future studies should investigate the role of acromioplasty during SSP repair in patients with a pathologic acromial slope and acromiohumeral interval. In this context, it should be determined whether a more-radical acromioplasty could reduce the risk of rerupture of the SSP in these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

A pilot randomised controlled trial assessing standard versus dermal patch-augmented rotator cuff repair found no adverse effects and suggest future trials need a minimum of 150 patients

PURPOSE

The aims of this pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) were to assess the safety and efficacy of a human dermal allograft patch and assess the feasibility of a future RCT comparing retear rate and functional outcome 12 months following standard and augmented double-row rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

 A pilot RCT was conducted among patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tear measuring between 1 and 5 cm. They were randomised to either augmented (double-row repair with human acellular dermal patch) or standard (double-row repair only). The primary outcome was rotator cuff retear determined on MRI scan at 12 months using the Sugaya's classification (grade 4 or 5). All adverse events were recorded. Functional assessment was performed at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-surgery using clinical outcome scores. Safety was assessed by complications and adverse effects, and feasibility by recruitment, follow-up rate and proof of concept statistical analyses of a future trial.

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2019, 63 patients were considered for inclusion. Twenty-three patients were excluded, leaving 40 patients (20 per group) in the final study population. The mean tear sizes were 3.0 cm in the augmented and 2.4 cm in the standard group. There was one adhesive capsulitis in the augmented group, with no other adverse events. Retear was observed in 4/18 (22%) of patients in the augmented and 5/18 (28%) in the standard group. In both groups, functional outcome improved significantly which was clinically meaningful for all scores, with no difference between groups. Retear rate increased with tear size. Future trials are feasible but need a minimum total sample size of 150 patients.

CONCLUSION

 Clinically meaningful improved function without adverse effects was found with human acellular dermal patch-augmented cuff repairs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Functional and Structural Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With or Without Preoperative Corticosteroid Injections

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are effective in alleviating pain in patients with rotator cuff tears, but controversy still exists regarding their potential adverse effects on clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair.

PURPOSE

To compare both the functional and the structural outcomes in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with or without preoperative CSIs.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out among patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for partial- and full-thickness tears between 2015 and 2019. The patients who received preoperative CSIs were included in the CSI group and compared with a group without preoperative CSIs (non-CSI group), matched at a ratio of 1:2 based on tear size, age, and follow-up time. Both functional evaluation and structural assessments using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed at the final follow-up. Clinical outcomes-including retear rate as the primary outcome; pain; functional scores including the Constant-Murley score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Fudan University Shoulder Score; range of motion (ROM); tendon integrity; tendon healing type; and cartilage thickness-were compared between the 2 groups with a statistical significance of P < .05 and power of 0.9.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were included in the CSI group, and 62 were included in the non-CSI group. After a mean 3-year follow-up, the 2 groups demonstrated no significant differences in retear rate; visual analog scale for pain; shoulder functional scores; and active ROM including forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation. No significant differences were observed on postoperative MRI scans of the rotator cuff tendon (tendon integrity, healing type, residual tendon attachment area, etc), cartilage thickness, and muscle atrophy.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were found at a mean 3-year follow-up in the retear rates, pain, ROM, and glenohumeral structure on postoperative MRI scans after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with or without preoperative CSIs.

Agreement between intraoperative and MRI assessments of rotator cuff pathology and two MRI-based assessments of supraspinatus muscle atrophy

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based rotator cuff assessment is often qualitative and subjective; few studies have tried to validate such preoperative assessments. This study investigates relationships of preoperative MRI assessments made by conventional approaches to intraoperative findings of tear type, location, and size or MRI-assessed muscle occupation ratio.

Methods

Intraoperatively, surgeons assessed tear type, location, anterior-posterior (AP) width, and medial-lateral length in 102 rotator cuff repair patients. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently assessed the preoperative MRI scans for these same parameters and supraspinatus muscle atrophy by both Warner classification and quantitative occupation ratio. Exact agreement proportions, kappa statistics, and correlation coefficients were used to quantify agreement relationships.

Results

Agreement between MRI readers’ and surgeons’ observations of tear status averaged 93% with κ = 0.38, and that of tear location averaged 77% with κ = 0.50. Concordance correlations of MRI and intraoperative measures of anterior-posterior and medial-lateral tear length averaged 0.59 and 0.56 across readers, respectively. Despite excellent interrater agreement on Warner classification (exact agreement proportion 0.91) and occupation ratio (concordance correlation 0.93) separately, correlations between these 2 measures were −0.54 and −0.64 for the 2 readers, respectively. Patients with Warner grade 0 had occupation ratios ranging from 0.5 to 1.5.

Conclusion

Correlations of preoperative MRI tear dimensions and muscle atrophy assessed by conventional approaches with intraoperatively measured tear dimensions and quantitative occupation ratio, respectively, were only fair. Since tear size and muscle atrophy are known strong predictors of outcomes following rotator cuff repair that may influence treatment decisions, surgeons need to be aware of the limitations of MRI methods. Continued development and validation of quantitative preoperative imaging methods to accurately assess these parameters are needed to improve surgical planning and prognosis.

MRI-based 3-dimensional volumetric assessment of fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy in rotator cuff tears

BACKGROUND

The Goutallier and Warner Classification systems are useful in determining rotator cuff reparability. Data are limited on how accurately the scapular-Y view used in both systems reflects the 3-dimensional (3-D) changes in fatty infiltration (FI) and muscle atrophy (MA). Tendon retraction in the setting of a cuff tear may also influence the perception of these changes. This study's objectives were to (1) measure the 3-D volume of the supraspinatus muscle in intact rotator cuffs, and with varying magnitudes of retraction; (2) measure the 3-D volume of FI in the supraspinatus muscle in these conditions; and (3) determine the influence of tendon retraction on measured FI and MA using the Goutallier and Warner Classification Systems.

METHODS

Between August 2015 and February 2016, all shoulder magnetic resonance images (MRIs) at the Portland VA Medical Center were standardized to include the medial scapular border. MRIs and charts were reviewed for inclusion/exclusion criteria. Included MRIs were categorized into 4 groups based on rotator cuff retraction. Supraspinatus muscle and fossa were traced to create 3-D volumes. FI and MA were measured within the supraspinatus. The supraspinatus muscle was graded among 6 physicians using the Goutallier and Warner classification systems. These grades were compared to 3-D measured FI and MA. The influence of tendon retraction on the measured grades were also evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred nine patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Ten MRIs for each group (N = 40) were included for image analysis. Supraspinatus volume tracings were highly reproducible and consistent between tracers. Supraspinatus muscle volumes decreased while global FI and MA increased with greater degrees of tendon retraction. In muscles with less than 10% global fat, fat concentrated in the lateral third of the muscle. In muscle with more than 10% global fat content, it distributed more diffusely throughout the muscle from medial to lateral. In comparing the scapular-Y to a medial cut, there was no consistent trend in FI whereas MA was more accurate at the medial cut.

CONCLUSION

Parasagittal imaging location did not significantly influence the Goutallier score; however, assessment of MA using the Warner score leads readers to perceive less MA medially regardless of the magnitude of tendon retraction. The pattern of FI within the supraspinatus muscle changes from a laterally based location around the muscle-tendon junction to a more diffuse, global infiltration pattern when the whole muscle fat content exceeds 10%.

Owen, Sugaya, and Hayashida Classifications Give Poor Intra- and Inter-Rater Agreement on a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Subscapularis Tendon Retears

PURPOSE

To investigate the intra- and inter-rater agreements for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations of subscapularis tendon integrity at 6 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs.

METHODS

Patients who had isolated or combined subscapularis tears and had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs were retrospectively included. The exclusion criteria included revision of arthroscopic surgery, minor subscapularis tears without repair, and inadequate postoperative images. MRI scans 6 months after surgery were used for the purpose of accessing the integrity of the subscapularis tendons. Three orthopaedic surgeons blindly evaluated the images twice at 2-week intervals. Three currently available classifications were used: the Owen classification, the Sugaya classification, and the Hayashida classification. Dichotomization and trichotomization methods were used for the Sugaya classification and Hayashida classifications. The aforementioned classification scores were combined for the agreement evaluation. Intra- and inter-rater agreement was assessed by calculating the Fleiss' kappa coefficients.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were included. Both the Owen and Hayashida classifications had poor inter-rater agreements (κ = 0.10 and 0.04, respectively) and poor-to-weak intra-rater agreements (κ = 0.27-0.44 and 0.16-0.45, respectively). The Sugaya classification had poor inter-rater agreement (κ = 0.10) and poor intra-rater agreements (κ = 0.16-0.32). Dichotomization and trichotomization of Sugaya and Hayashida classifications did not lead to superior agreements. The classification combination resulted in poor inter- and intra-rater agreements (κ = 0.01-0.12 and 0.08-0.39, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The Owen classification, Sugaya classification, and Hayashida classification had poor intra- and inter-rater agreement in terms of evaluating subscapularis tendon re-tears on 6 months' postoperative MRI. The dichotomized and trichotomized classifications as well as the combined classifications from currently available classifications did not lead to superior agreements.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, diagnostic: case series.