Glenohumeral osteoarthritis with intact rotator cuff treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

Shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly

Background

Shoulder arthroplasty is increasingly being used for definitive treatment of various shoulder pathologies, especially in more elderly patients. Controversy surrounds the optimal choice in total shoulder arthroplasty for elderly patients. In this review we discuss the options available when considering TSA for an elderly patient.

Review

Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) relies upon an intact, functioning rotator cuff. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) relies upon a functioning deltoid for optimal outcomes. The setting of partial cuff tears. Both options confer their own advantages and disadvantages.ATSA are a valuable treatment option for elderly patients with severe shoulder arthritis or degenerative conditions, offering significant pain relief and functional improvement. While it provides numerous advantages, including pain relief, preservation of bone stock, and natural joint mechanics, careful patient selection and consideration of potential drawbacks such as rotator cuff integrity and surgical complexity are crucial for optimising outcomes in this population.RTSA has become a valuable treatment solution for elderly patients with complex shoulder conditions, offering significant pain relief, improved functionality, and enhanced quality of life. While careful consideration of patient factors and potential complications is necessary, RTSA continues to demonstrate favourable outcomes and good survivorship in the elderly.

Discussion

Debate continues optimal shoulder arthroplasty management for elderly patients. Technology continues to advance the surgical technique for shoulder arthroplasty and address some of the challenges encountered. Research continues to try and help answer many of the debated areas of shoulder arthroplasty, but current evidence continues to show an improving trend in survivorship and long-term outcomes for most shoulder arthroplasty procedures.

Outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: evaluation of implant-related, radiographic, and demographic factors influencing durability and revision rates

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of implant-associated and radiographic factors on survival rates and revisions of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in patients with primary osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 68 patients who underwent TSA for primary OA at a single institution between 2008 and 2015, with a minimum follow-up of 60 months. Patients with prior shoulder surgeries, perioperative infections, or revisions within 12 months postoperatively were excluded. Patients were divided into Group A (Survivors) and Group B (Revisions) based on implant survival. Radiographic parameters analyzed included critical shoulder angle (CSA), acromiohumeral distance (AHD), lateral offset (LO), humeral head-stem index (HSI), centre of rotation (COR), and glenoid erosion, categorized using Sirveaux, Lévigne, Franceschi, and Walch classifications. Demographic data were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 68 patients, 57 were in Group A (mean age: 58.5 ± 10.1 years; follow-up: 115.8 months) and 11 in Group B (mean age: 61.4 ± 8.3 years; follow-up: 113.9 months). Implant survival was 84% after 115.8 ± 34.5 months. Baseline demographics were comparable (e.g., smoking: p = 0.75), as was osteolysis prevalence (Group A: 47%; Group B: 45%; p = 0.91). HSI was significantly higher in Group B (0.5 ± 0.1 vs. 0.4 ± 0.1; p = 0.03). No other radiographic differences were significant.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty can expect favourable mid- to long-term outcomes, with implant survival rates of 84% and relatively low complication rates. Although osteolysis is common, it rarely necessitates revision surgery. The role of the humeral head-stem index (HSI) warrants further investigation.

STUDY DESIGN

Level IV; retrospective case study.

Treatment of B2 type glenoids with anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective review

Background

Patients with glenohumeral arthritis with Walch B2 glenoid morphology present a challenge for shoulder surgeons. Poor outcomes have been demonstrated in patients with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) left in retroversion. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) yields good midterm results. There is a paucity of studies comparing aTSA to rTSA in patients with glenohumeral arthritis and B2 glenoids. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of aTSA vs. rTSA in patients with glenohumeral arthritis with B2 glenoid morphology.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty by a single surgeon. Preoperative computed tomography was used to determine glenoid type based on the modified Walch classification. Patients with B2 glenoid morphology were included in the study. Patients who had evidence of a rotator cuff tear or less than two years of follow-up were excluded. Patients were categorized by procedure type (aTSA vs. rTSA). Preoperative glenoid version, glenoid inclination, and posterior humeral head subluxation were measured using computed tomography. Patient reported outcome measures, active range of motion, and complications requiring revision (instability, rotator cuff insufficiency, infection, component loosening) were recorded. Postoperative glenoid version, glenoid inclination, and evidence of humeral head decentering were evaluated on standard shoulder radiographs. Statistical analysis was performed and results are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Results

A total of 224 patients were included. One hundred sixty-two patients underwent aTSA and 62 underwent rTSA. The mean length of follow-up was 25.6 ± 1.95 months for the rTSA group and 32.8 ± 2.27 for the aTSA group (P = .002). Patients who underwent rTSA were significantly older (P < .001) and had a significantly higher proportion of females (P = .019). Postoperatively patients in the aTSA group had significantly better external rotation (P < .001) and internal rotation (IR) compared to the rTSA group (P < .001). There were no differences in patient reported outcome measures between the two groups. No patients in the aTSA group had recurrent posterior humeral head subluxation. Eight complications requiring revision occurred, 4 in each group. One patient who underwent aTSA had evidence of glenoid loosening. There was no evidence of glenoid loosening in the rTSA group.

Conclusions

aTSA and rTSA can produce good results in patients with B2 glenoid morphology with low rates of revision with appropriate patient selection. aTSA may result in improved range of motion that may not be clinically relevant.

Influence of preoperative rotational shoulder stiffness on rate of motion restoration after anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff

BACKGROUND

A subset of patients undergoing anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA and rTSA) lag behind their peers in regaining overhead range of motion (ROM) after surgery. The primary purpose of this study was to compare the rate of recovery of ROM after aTSA and rTSA performed in stiff (preoperative passive external rotation [ER] ≤0 °) versus non-stiff (preoperative passive ER >0°) shoulders with RCI-GHOA.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that preoperatively stiff shoulders (preoperative passive ER ≤0 °) would have slower recovery in ROM postoperatively with lower postoperative motion compared to non-stiff shoulders.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective review of a multi-institution shoulder arthroplasty database was performed between 2001 and 2021. We identified 1,164 aTSAs and 539 rTSAs performed for RCI-GHOA with a minimum of 2-year clinical follow-up along with follow-up between 3-6 months and a third visit at any other time point. Primarily, the rate of recovery in ROM and time to maximum ROM was evaluated. Secondarily, we assessed six outcome scores and the influence of subscapularis repair during rTSA. Recovery in each outcome was modeled using continuous two-phase segmented linear regression models with random effects. Rate of recovery was defined as the slope of the first segment. Patients were considered to have recovered after surgery at the timepoint corresponding to the inflection point between piecewise segments.

RESULTS

Of the 1,164 aTSAs and 539 rTSAs included, 172 aTSAs (15%) and 80 rTSAs (15%) were stiff preoperatively, respectively. Compared to preoperatively stiff aTSAs, non-stiff aTSAs regained ER, abduction, internal rotation (IR), and forward elevation (FE) faster over a shorter duration. Similarly, non-stiff rTSAs regained ER, abduction, and FE faster and over a shorter duration compared to stiff rTSAs, but regained IR more slowly over a longer duration. Stiff rTSAs performed with subscapularis repair did not have any appreciable gain in ER after the immediate postoperative period. Although non-stiff and stiff rTSAs performed without subscapularis repair regained ER at a similar rate (4.4 vs. 4.2 °/month), stiff rTSAs continued to regain ER 1.9-times longer (11.9 vs. 6.4 months). When the subscapularis was repaired, non-stiff rTSAs regained abduction and IR faster over a short duration compared to stiff rTSAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative stiffness is associated with slower recovery of active ROM over a longer duration in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty for RCI-GHOA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.

Anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff intact glenohumeral osteoarthritis

Glenohumeral osteoarthritis in the presence of an intact rotator cuff is a debilitating condition that often leads to surgical intervention in the form of joint arthroplasty. Historically, anatomic total shoulder replacement (ATSR) had been considered the treatment of choice. Over the past decade, however, there has been a shift in treatment patterns to the use of reverse shoulder replacement to treat this condition due to concerns of subsequent rotator cuff failure and glenoid component loosening with ATSR. With continued innovation of implants and surgical techniques, it is unclear which procedure provides the best outcomes for patients. The Reverse or Anatomical replacement for Painful Shoulder Osteoarthritis, Differences between Interventions trial aims to definitively answer this question and evaluate the cost effectiveness of both procedures.

Testosterone Replacement Therapy Is Not Associated with Greater Revision Rates in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background/Objectives: Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) has become increasingly common, particularly for patients with symptomatic hypogonadism or individuals undergoing gender-affirming therapy. The current literature is inconclusive on the association between TRT and orthopedic surgery. This study sought to examine outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients receiving TRT. Methods: A retrospective cohort of RSA patients from 2010 to 2022 was queried using the PearlDiver database. Patients were included if they underwent RSA with at least 2 years of follow-up. Patients who underwent at least 90 days of TRT prior to their surgery were matched by Charlson Comorbidity Index, age, and gender to a control cohort. Univariate analysis using chi-squared tests and Student's t-tests were used to compare demographics outcomes between groups. Results: A total of 1906 patients were identified who used TRT within 90 days of undergoing RSA, and these patients were matched to a control cohort of 1906 patients. Patients who used TRT within 90 days did not have significantly different rates of revision RSA (12.01%) compared to those without use (11.02%) (p = 0.335). Furthermore, between the TRT group and the control group, PJI rates (1.42% vs. 1.63%; p = 0.597) and periprosthetic fracture rates (0.58% vs. 1.05%, p = 0.105) were not significantly different. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that TRT use within 90 days of RSA does not increase the rates of revision, fracture, or infection. These results can assist surgeons when evaluating patients on TRT who also may be candidates for RSA.

A comparative analysis of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for posterior glenoid wear patterns

Introduction

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) are well-known methods of treating glenohumeral arthritis, which often leads to posterior wear of the glenoid. This study compared minimum two-year outcome measures in patients treated with RSA and TSA for Walch B2 and B3 glenoids.

Methods

Thirty-eight shoulders underwent TSA and 40 shoulders underwent RSA by two fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons at a tertiary referral center.

Results

The mean time for follow-up was 25.9 months and 25.5 months for RSA and TSA groups, respectively (P = 0.47). The RSA group consisted of 27 males and 13 females; whereas the TSA group had 37 males and 1 female (P = <0.001). The mean age for RSA was 71 years old, 61 years for TSA (P = <0.001). TSA patients demonstrated superior average active external rotation (47° vs 40°; P = 0.003) and internal rotation (60° vs 52°; P = 0.002). Active forward elevation did not significantly differ. The TSA group had 7 (18.4 %) postoperative complications, the RSA group had 3 (7.5 %) (P = 0.27). The most common complication was cephalic vein thrombosis. No complication required revision.

Conclusions

Patients with shoulder osteoarthritis and posterior glenoid wear patterns with an intact rotator cuff who underwent TSA had similar outcomes as RSA. While the TSA group had superior active external rotation and internal rotation at 2 years postoperative compared with RSA, the 2-year active forward elevation was equivalent. Both groups had similar 2-year outcomes for strength in all planes and in all three clinical-outcome scoring systems. The TSA group demonstrated a higher incidence of postoperative complications. Neither group required reoperations. These results indicate that TSA and RSA can be safely utilized in posterior glenoid wear patterns with good clinical outcomes.

Level of evidence

Level III; Retrospective cohort study.

The effects of preoperative glenohumeral osteoarthritis on rotator cuff repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of rotator cuff repair surgery in treating rotator cuff tears in individuals with mild glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA).

METHODS

A computer-based search was conducted across multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library using the keywords "Shoulder Joints", "Osteoarthrosis", and "rotator cuff". Only studies focusing on patients with GHOA who underwent rotator cuff repair were considered for inclusion. The pertinent data was extracted and assessed for heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies involving 924 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The treatment outcomes of patients with rotator cuff tears accompanied by mild GHOA and those with simple rotator cuff tears after rotator cuff repair were comparable in terms of retear(OR: 1.24; 95% CI 0.82-1.89; P = 0.31). The postoperative functional scores: the VAS score (MD: 0.14; 95% CI -0.19-0.47; P = 0.41)、ASES score (MD: -0.33; 95% CI -1.64-0.99)were similar between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of rotator cuff tears(small to moderate, MD: 0.85; 95%CI -0.65-2.39; p = 0.28; large to massive, MD: -1.94; 95% CI -8.45-4.58; P = 0.56), showed no difference in postoperative ASES scores between the two groups. Constant score (MD:-3.20; 95% CI -6.33-0.08; P = 0.04), external rotation (ER) in Range of motion (ROM) (MD: -4.42; 95% CI -6.72-2.13; P = 0.0002) and forward flexion (FF) in ROM(MD: -4.22; 95% CI -8.28-0.15; P = 0.04) were superior in patients with simple rotator cuff tears compared to those with rotator cuff tears accompanied by GHOA.

CONCLUSION

Patients with rotator cuff tears and mild GHOA can achieve shoulder joint restoration after shoulder cuff repair surgery, and there is only a certain difference in postoperative Constant Score and ROM between these two groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration CRD42024565212.

Shoulder arthroplasty in the upper extremity weight-bearing patient: a systematic review of clinical outcomes and complications

BACKGROUND

Patients who rely on their upper extremities for ambulation, or upper extremity ambulators (UEAs), place considerable stress on their shoulders through the use of assistive devices like walkers, crutches, canes, and wheelchairs. It has been postulated that UEAs may be at increased risk for complications following shoulder arthroplasty. This study aimed to systematically review the literature related to (1) patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs), (2) functional outcomes, and (3) complications in UEAs who undergo shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies reporting clinical outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty in UEAs. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, patient-reported outcomes measures, radiographic outcomes, and postoperative range of motion were collected and compared to control patients (ie bipedal ambulators) from the constituent studies.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies evaluating 248 UEA cases and 206 control cases were included for review. Ambulatory assistive devices utilized by UEAs included walkers (39%), wheelchairs (38%), canes (22%), and a crutch (<1%). Among UEA cases, 197 (79%) reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), 37 (15%) anatomic TSA, and 14 (6%) hemiarthroplasty were performed. Overall, patients exhibited significant improvements in mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Constant-Murley scores, Simple Shoulder Test scores, and Visual Analog Scale scores postoperatively. Among 3 studies that included comparison with control groups of bipedal ambulators, no significant differences in outcomes were identified. The overall clinical complication rate was 17% for UEAs compared to 9.1% for controls. The rate of revision surgery was 7.7% for UEAs and 4.9% for bipedal ambulators.

CONCLUSIONS

UEAs experience satisfactory pain relief, functional improvements, and good subjective outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty. However, complication and revision rates are higher compared to those for bipedal ambulators, and the majority of UEAs undergo reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared to anatomic TSA.

The effect of reverse shoulder arthroplasty design and surgical indications on deltoid and rotator cuff muscle length

BACKGROUND

Advancements in surgical planning, technique, and prosthesis design have improved adaptation to patient anatomy in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Postoperative changes in deltoid and rotator cuff muscle length are important and may vary based on preoperative indications and prosthesis selection. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the changes in deltoid and rotator cuff muscle length for planned rTSA using the spectrum of prosthesis configurations in both glenohumeral arthritis (GHOA) and rotator cuff tear arthropathy (RCA).

METHODS

Ten shoulder arthroplasty surgeons used preoperative planning software to plan rTSA cases for 20 subjects (10 GHOA, 10 RCA) following surgical guidelines. Each surgeon planned each case using 3 prosthesis configurations: (1) 8-mm lateralized glenosphere and 135° neck-shaft angle (135 + 8), (2) 4-mm lateralized glenosphere and 145° neck-shaft angle (145 + 4), and (3) 0-mm lateralized glenosphere and 155° neck-shaft angle (155 + 0). Pre- and postoperative deltoid and rotator cuff muscle lengths and percentage-change were calculated and compared between prosthesis configurations within each indication. Different muscle lines of action were included representing the deltoid, subscapularis, infraspinatus, and teres minor.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, the RCA cohort had significantly shorter muscle lines of action in the posterior, lateral, and anterior deltoid (P < .001), a longer inferior subscapularis (P = .022), and a longer teres minor (P = .001) than the GHOA cohort. ANOVA and post-hoc analysis showed that postplanning lengths of each deltoid action line were greater in the 155 + 0 configuration compared to the 135 + 8 configuration in the RCA cohort (P < .001, P = .003, P = .032, respectively), and postplanning lengths of the anterior and middle deltoid action lines were also greater for the same comparison in the GHOA cohort (P = .004 and P = .017, respectively). There were no significant differences in postplanning deltoid lengths between the 135 + 8 and 145 + 4 configurations in either diagnosis cohort (P > .05). All postplanning rotator cuff muscle lengths (subscapularis, infraspinatus, and teres minor) differed significantly (P < .001) between all prosthesis configurations in both diagnosis cohorts, with the 135 + 8 configuration resulting in the longest lengths and the 155 + 0 configuration resulting in the shortest lengths.

CONCLUSION

Automated preoperative planning software calculates the lengths of muscle action lines, which vary between GHOA and RCA diagnoses. Varying rTSA implant geometries result in predictable differences in deltoid lengthening and rotator cuff shortening. Shoulder prostheses with a more lateralized center of rotation show greater rotator cuff muscle length and similar deltoid muscle length when compared to medialized designs with similar deltoid lengthening. Surgeons can use this software to understand the impact of implant geometry on muscle length.

Clinical outcomes validate the RAND/UCLA appropriateness criteria algorithm for anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty for streamlining the clinical decision-making process

Aims

A recent study used the RAND Corporation at University of California, Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) method to develop anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) appropriateness criteria. The purpose of our study was to determine how patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) vary based on appropriateness.

Methods

Clinical data from a multicentre database identified patients who underwent primary aTSA from November 2004 to January 2023. A total of 390 patients (mean follow-up 48.1 months (SD 42.0)) were included: 97 (24.9%) were classified as appropriate, 218 (55.9%) inconclusive, and 75 (19.2%) inappropriate. Patients were classified as "appropriate", "inconclusive", or "inappropriate", using a modified version of an appropriateness algorithm, which accounted for age, rotator cuff status, mobility, symptomatology, and Walch classification. Multiple pre- and postoperative scores were analyzed using Pearson's chi-squared test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Postoperative complications were also analyzed.

Results

All groups achieved significant improvement in mean PROM scores postoperatively. "Appropriate" patients experienced significantly greater improvement in visual analogue scale (VAS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score compared to "inconclusive" and "inappropriate". The appropriate group had a significantly greater proportion of patients who achieved minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (95.8%; n = 93) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) (92.6%; n = 89). Overall, 13 patients had postoperative complications. No significant differences in postoperative complications among classifications were found.

Conclusion

Our data clinically validate the RAND/UCLA aTSA appropriateness criteria algorithm, allowing for more rapid and reliable determination of aTSA candidacy. "Appropriate" patients were more likely to achieve MCID and SCB for ASES scores compared to "inappropriate" patients. Among "appropriate" patients who did not achieve SCB, 50% (n = 4) had a postoperative complication. There was a significantly higher proportion of postoperative complications among those who did not achieve SCB across all three groups. Only 7.1% (n = 1) of patients who did not achieve SCB in the inappropriate group had a postoperative complication. Thus, it can be inferred that the failure to reach SCB in the appropriate group was likely to be due to a postoperative complication, whereas for patients deemed "inappropriate", failure to reach SCB may be secondary to factors accounted for within our algorithm.

Outcomes following revision of a failed primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Aims

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has become the most common type of shoulder arthroplasty used in the UK, and a better understanding of the outcomes after revision of a failed RSA is needed. The aim of this study was to review the current evidence systematically to determine patient-reported outcome measures and the rates of re-revision and complications for patients undergoing revision of a RSA.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched. Studies involving adult patients who underwent revision of a primary RSA for any indication were included. Those who underwent a RSA for failure of a total shoulder arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty were excluded. Pre- and postoperative shoulder scores were evaluated in a random effects meta-analysis to determine the mean difference. The rates of re-revision and complications were also calculated.

Results

The initial search elicited 3,166 results and, following removal of duplicates and screening, 13 studies with a total of 1,042 RSAs were identified. An increase in shoulder scores pre- to postoperatively was reported in all the studies. Following revision of a RSA to a further RSA, there was a significant increase in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (mean difference 20.78 (95% CI 8.16 to 33.40); p = 0.001). A re-revision rate at final follow-up ranging from 9% to 32%, a one-year re-revision rate of 14%, and a five-year re-revision rate of 23% were reported. The complication rate in all the studies was between 18.5% and 36%, with a total incidence of 29%.

Conclusion

This is the largest systematic review of the outcomes following revision of a RSA. We found an improvement in functional outcomes after revision surgery, but the rates of re-revision and complications are high and warrant consideration when planning a revision procedure.

Intraoperative Navigation in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Advantages and Future Prospects

Intraoperative navigation is a novel technology that can provide real-time feedback to the surgeon during implantation and enhance the accuracy and precision of glenoid component positioning. Applications of intraoperative navigation systems have demonstrated increased precision in baseplate version and inclination, as well as improved baseplate screw placement, with fewer screws used and greater purchase length achieved when compared to standard instrumentation. Early clinical studies have shown favorable results, with significantly improved patient-reported and clinical outcomes and decreased complications. The implementation of intraoperative navigation is associated with a short learning curve and a minimal increase in operative time. Nevertheless, further research is necessary to substantiate the clinical benefit of navigation and evaluate its economic cost-effectiveness and impact on implant survival. Augmented reality and robotic-assisted surgery are additional emerging technologies that, while novel, hold the potential to further advance the field of shoulder arthroplasty.

Stratification of the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after total shoulder arthroplasty by implant type, preoperative diagnosis, and sex

BACKGROUND

Clinical significance, as opposed to statistical significance, has increasingly been utilized to evaluate outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The purpose of this study was to identify thresholds of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for TSA outcome metrics and determine if these thresholds are influenced by prosthesis type (anatomic or reverse TSA), sex, or preoperative diagnosis.

METHODS

A prospectively collected international multicenter database inclusive of 38 surgeons was queried for patients receiving a primary aTSA or rTSA between 2003 and 2021. Prospectively, outcome metrics including ASES, shoulder function score (SFS), SST, UCLA, Constant, VAS Pain, shoulder arthroplasty smart (SAS) score, forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation was recorded preoperatively and at each follow-up. A patient satisfaction question was administered at each follow-up. Anchor-based MCID, SCB, and PASS were calculated as defined previously overall and according to implant type, preoperative diagnosis, and sex. The percentage of patients achieving thresholds was also quantified.

RESULTS

A total of 5851 total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs) including aTSA (n = 2236) and rTSA (n = 3615) were included in the study cohort. The following were identified as MCID thresholds for the overall (aTSA + rTSA irrespective of diagnosis or sex) cohort: VAS Pain (-1.5), SFS (1.2), SST (2.1), Constant (7.2), ASES (13.9), UCLA (8.2), SPADI (-21.5), and SAS (7.3), Abduction (13°), Forward elevation (16°), External rotation (4°), Internal rotation score (0.2). SCB thresholds for the overall cohort were: VAS Pain (-3.3), SFS (2.9), SST 3.8), Constant (18.9), ASES (33.1), UCLA (12.3), SPADI (-44.7), and SAS (18.2), Abduction (30°), Forward elevation (31°), External rotation (12°), Internal rotation score (0.9). PASS thresholds for the overall cohort were: VAS Pain (0.8), SFS (7.3), SST (9.2), Constant (64.2), ASES (79.5), UCLA (29.5), SPADI (24.7), and SAS (72.5), Abduction (104°), Forward elevation (130°), External rotation (30°), Internal rotation score (3.2). MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds varied depending on preoperative diagnosis and sex.

CONCLUSION

MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds vary depending on implant type, preoperative diagnosis, and sex. A comprehensive understanding of these differences as well as identification of clinically relevant thresholds for legacy and novel metrics is essential to assist surgeons in evaluating their patient's outcomes, interpreting the literature, and counseling their patients preoperatively regarding expectations for improvement. Given that PASS thresholds are fragile and vary greatly depending on cohort variability, caution should be exercised in conflating them across different studies.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis with restricted preoperative forward elevation demonstrates similar outcomes but faster range of motion recovery compared to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been increasingly utilized for a variety of shoulder pathologies that are difficult to treat with anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Few studies have compared the outcomes of TSA vs. RSA in patients with cuff intact glenohumeral osteoarthritis and poor preoperative forward elevation. This study aimed to determine whether there is a difference in functional outcomes and postoperative range of motion (ROM) between TSA and RSA in these patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 116 patients who underwent RSA or TSA between 2013 and 2022 for the treatment of rotator cuff intact primary osteoarthritis with restricted preoperative forward flexion (FF) and a minimum 1-year follow-up. Each arthroplasty group was divided into 2 subgroups: patients with preoperative FF between 91° and 120° or FF lower than or equal to 90°. Patients' clinical outcomes, including active ROM, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, visual analog scale for pain, and subjective shoulder value were collected. Clinical and radiographic complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between RSA and TSA in terms of sex (58.3% male vs. 62.2% male, P = .692), or follow-up duration (20.1 months vs. 17.7 months, P = .230). However, the RSA cohort was significantly older (72.0 ± 8.2 vs. 65.4 ± 10.6, P = .012) and weaker in FF and (ER) before surgery (P < .001). There was no difference between RSA (57 patients) and TSA (59 patients) in visual analog scale pain score (1.2 ± 2.3 vs. 1.3 ± 2.3, P = .925), subjective shoulder value score (90 ± 15 vs. 90 ± 15, P = .859), or American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (78.4 ± 20.5 vs. 82.1 ± 23.2, P = .476). Postoperative active ROM was statistically similar between RSA and TSA cohorts in FF (145 ± 26 vs. 146 ± 23, P = .728) and ER (39 ± 15 vs. 41 ± 15, P = .584). However, internal rotation was lower in the RSA cohort (P < .001). This was also true in each subgroup. RSA led to faster postoperative FF and ER achievement at 3 months (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between cohorts.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis who have a structurally intact rotator cuff but limited preoperative forward elevation can achieve predictable clinical improvement in pain, ROM, and function after either TSA or RSA. Reverse arthroplasty may be a reliable treatment option in patients at risk for developing rotator cuff failure.

Patients 75 years or older with primary glenohumeral arthritis and an intact rotator cuff show similar clinical improvement after reverse or anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of primary glenohumeral arthritis (GHOA) in the elderly is an ongoing topic of debate. The purpose of this study was to compare functional outcomes and complications in patients aged 75 years or older treated with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for primary GHOA with an intact rotator cuff.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on a prospectively maintained database which was queried for patients 75 years of age or older who underwent TSA or RSA for primary GHOA with an intact rotator cuff at a single institution between 2012 and 2021 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including Visual Analog Scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Subjective Shoulder Value, as well as active range of motion including forward flexion, external rotation, internal rotation, were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. Complications, reoperations, and satisfaction were also recorded. The percentage of patients achieving clinically significant improvement was evaluated with the minimally clinical important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state for each PRO.

RESULTS

One-hundred and 4 patients were available for analysis, including 67 TSA patients and 37 RSAs with a mean follow-up of 39.4 months. Preoperative baseline characteristics, PROs, and range of motion were similar between groups. RSA was more commonly performed for eccentric glenoid wear (Walch B2/B3, 62% vs. 22%; P < .001). While clinical outcomes improved comparably in both groups, the TSA cohort showed significantly greater improvement in external rotation (36° vs. 26°; P = .013). Both cohorts had low revision (3% for TSA vs. 0% for RSA) and complication (7% for TSA vs. 5% for RSA; P = .677) rates. Satisfaction was similar in both groups (93% for TSA vs. 92% for RSA; P = .900). Clinically significant improvement was comparable between groups based on the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (minimally clinical important difference, 93% for TSA vs. 100% for RSA; substantial clinical benefit, 82% vs. 95%; patient acceptable symptomatic state, 67% vs. 78%; P > .05).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective small sample size comparison study, TSA and RSA provide similar short-term clinical outcomes for patients 75 years and older with primary GHOA and an intact rotator cuff. Complication and revision rates are comparably low at short-term follow-up. Our data suggests that advanced age alone should not be used as a decision-making tool for TSA vs. RSA in the setting of primary GHOA with an intact rotator cuff.

The effect of eccentric glenoid reaming in reverse shoulder artrhoplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis

Background

The objective of this study was to evaluate the abilitiy of eccentric reaming in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA), to correct preoperative glenoid retroversion and to compare with cuff tear arthopaty (CTA) cases.

Methods

Fifty-nine patients who underwent RSA with GHOA or CTA diagnosis between 2013 and 2022 and who had pre- and postoperative computed tomography scans were included in the study. Preoperative glenoid version and postoperative glenoid component versions of 17 patients with GHOA and 40 patients with CTA were measured by Friedman method.

Results

The median preoperative glenoid versions in GHOA and CTA groups were measured as 16° and 4° retroverted respectively (p < 0.01). The median postoperative glenoid component versions in GHOA and CTA groups were 5° and 3° retroverted respectively (p = 0.09). The version change differences between the two groups varied significantly (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

GHOA is related with higher preoperative glenoid retroversion compared to CTA. However; with eccentric glenoid reaming, adequate version correction and similar postoperative glenoid version can be achieved in GHOA compared to CTA when performing a RSA.

Level of evidence

Level III. Retrospective study. Treatment study.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: significantly different characteristics and outcomes in shoulders with intact vs. torn rotator cuff

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for primary osteoarthritis (OA) with and without rotator cuff (RC) tears to those with secondary OA due to RC tears.

METHODS

We reviewed records of all patients who received RSA for primary OA or secondary OA. All patients had preoperative radiographs, computed tomographic arthrography (CTA), and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of their shoulders to assess their etiology, glenoid morphology, and fatty infiltration. Pre- and postoperative (at minimum follow-up of 2 years) Constant scores and range of motion were compared between patients who had RSA for primary OA with and without RC tears to those with secondary OA due to RC tears.

RESULTS

Of the initial cohort of 605 shoulders (583 patients), 153 were lost to follow-up (25.3%), 25 required revision with implant removal (4.1%), and 13 died of causes unrelated to the surgery (2.1%), and left a final cohort of 414 patients. Of the final cohort, 97 had primary OA with intact RC, 62 had primary OA with RC tears, and 255 had secondary OA. Postoperative Constant scores were significantly higher for primary OA with intact RC (73.8 ± 14.3), compared with both primary OA with RC tears (66.1 ± 14.6, P < .001) and secondary OA (64.1 ± 14.8, P < .001). There were no differences in pre- or postoperative scores between primary OA with RC tears and secondary OA.

CONCLUSION

At 2 or more years following RSA, Constant scores were significantly higher for primary OA with intact RC, compared to either primary OA with RC tears or secondary OA, whereas there were no differences in pre- or postoperative scores of shoulders that had primary OA with RC tears vs. secondary OA. The authors recommend distinguishing primary OA with intact RC from primary OA with RC tears, as the two have considerably different characteristics and prognosis following RSA.

Clinical outcomes of anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis with preoperative external rotation weakness and an intact rotator cuff: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Anatomic (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) are well-established treatments for patients with primary osteoarthritis and an intact cuff. However, it is unclear whether aTSA or rTSA provides superior outcomes in patients with preoperative external rotation (ER) weakness.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database was performed between 2007 and 2020. Patients were excluded for preoperative diagnoses of nerve injury, infection, tumor, or fracture. The analysis included 333 aTSAs and 155 rTSAs performed for primary cuff-intact osteoarthritis with 2-year minimum follow-up. Defining preoperative ER weakness as strength <3.3 kilograms (7.2 pounds), 3 cohorts were created and matched: (1) weak aTSAs (n = 74) vs. normal aTSAs (n = 74), (2) weak rTSAs (n = 38) vs. normal rTSAs (n = 38), and (3) weak rTSAs (n = 60) vs. weak aTSAs (n = 60). We compared range of motion, outcome scores, strength, complications, and revision rates at the latest follow-up.

RESULTS

Despite weak aTSAs having poorer preoperative strength in forward elevation and ER (P < .001), neither of these deficits persisted postoperatively compared with the normal cohort. Likewise, weak rTSAs had poorer preoperative strength in forward elevation and ER, overhead motion, and Constant, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and University of California, Los Angeles scores (P < .029). However, no statistically significant differences were found between preoperatively weak and normal rTSAs. When comparing weak aTSA vs. weak rTSA, no differences were found in preoperative and postoperative outcomes, proportion of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit, and complication and rate of revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In preoperatively weak patients with cuff-intact primary osteoarthritis, aTSA leads to similar postoperative strength, range of motion, and outcome scores compared with patients with normal preoperative strength, indicating that preoperative weakness does not preclude aTSA use. Furthermore, patients who were preoperatively weak in ER demonstrated improved postoperative rotational motion after undergoing aTSA and rTSA, with both groups achieving the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at similar rates.

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis With Intact Rotator Cuffs: A Meta-Analyses

Traditional practice favors total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (PGHO) with an intact rotator cuff; however, the indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have expanded to include PGHO. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare the mean differences in the range of motion and patient-reported outcomes between the TSA and RSA with an intact rotator cuff and to analyze the subgroup of the Walch type B2 glenoid. This IRB-exempt, PROSPERO-registered systematic review strictly followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. A literature search of five databases revealed 493 articles, of which 10 were included for quantitative synthesis. Level III evidence studies with the diagnosis of PGHO and ≥2 years of follow-up were included. Studies without preoperative and postoperative data were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the methodologic quality of the included studies. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion and patient-reported outcomes were collected. The random-effects model was employed, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There were a total of 544 and 329 studies in the TSA group and RSA group, respectively. The mean age in the TSA group and RSA groups were 65.36 ± 7.06 and 73.12 ± 2.40, respectively (p = 0.008). The percentages of males in the TSA and RSA groups were 73.2% and 51.1%, respectively (p = 0.02). The mean differences in forward elevation, external rotation in adduction, internal rotation scale, visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores were improved for both groups with no significant differences between the two. There were 9.6 times the revisions in the TSA group (8.8% vs. 0.91%; p = 0.014) and 1.5 times the complications in the TSA group (3.68% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.0096). Two hundred and forty-two glenoids were identified as Walch type B2 (126 in the TSA group and 116 in the RSA group). The mean ages in the B2 subgroup were 68.20 ± 3.25 and 73.03 ± 1.49 for the TSA and RSA, respectively (p = 0.25). The percentages of males in the B2 subgroup were 74.6% and 46.5% for the TSA and RSA groups, respectively (p = 0.0003). The ASES, SANE, forward elevation, and external rotation in the adduction results were descriptively summarized for this subgroup, with average mean differences of 49.0 and 51.2, 45.7 and 66.1, 77.6° and 58.6°, and 38.6° and 34.1° for the TSA and RSA groups, respectively. In the setting of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff, the RSA has a similar range of motion and clinical outcomes but lower complication and revision rates as compared to the TSA. This may hold true in the setting of the B2 glenoid, although a high-powered study on this subgroup is required. Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty maintains an important role in select patients. Further studies are required to better elucidate the role of glenoid bone loss and posterior humeral head subluxation with regard to implant choice.

Patient-specific implants in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is widely popular among shoulder surgeons and patients, and its prevalence has increased dramatically in recent years. With this increased use, the indicated pathologies associated with RTSA are more likely to be encountered, and challenging patient presentations are more likely to be seen. One prominent challenging presentation is RTSA patients with severe glenoid bone loss. Several techniques with varying degrees of invasiveness, including excessive reaming, alternate centerline, bone grafting, and patient-specific implants (PSIs), have been developed to treat patients with this presentation. PSI treatment uses a three-dimensional reconstruction of a computed tomography scan to design a prosthetic implant or component customized to the patient's glenoid morphology, allowing compensation for any significant bone loss. The novelty of this technology implies a paucity of available literature, and although many studies show that PSIs have good potential for solving challenging shoulder problems, some studies have reported questionable and equivocal outcomes. Additional research is needed to explore the indications, outcomes, techniques, and cost-efficiency of this technology to help establish its role in current treatment guidelines and strategies.

Anatomic versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes after prior contralateral anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with bilateral primary osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare outcomes in patients that underwent bilateral anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) vs. aTSA/ reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for rotator cuff-intact glenohumeral osteoarthritis (RCI-GHOA) to further elucidate the role of rTSA in this patient population.

METHODS

A single-institution prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database was reviewed for patients undergoing bilateral total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for RCI-GHOA with a primary aTSA and subsequent contralateral aTSA or rTSA. Outcome scores (SPADI, SST, ASES, UCLA, Constant) and active range of motion (abduction, forward elevation [FE], external and internal rotation [ER and IR]) were evaluated. Clinically relevant benchmarks (minimal clinically important difference [MCID], substantial clinical benefit [SCB], and patient acceptable symptomatic state [PASS]) were evaluated against values in prior literature. Incidence of surgical complications and revision rates were examined in qualifying patients as well as those without 

RESULTS

Of the 55 bilateral TSA patients with an intact rotator cuff, 46 underwent aTSA/aTSA and 9 underwent aTSA/rTSA. At the time of the second TSA, patients undergoing aTSA/rTSA were older (71 ± 4 vs. 67 ± 7, P = .032) and more commonly had inflammatory arthritis (44% vs. 11%, P = .031). Mean time to the second TSA was shorter for aTSA/aTSA (2.3 ± 2.8 vs. 4.4 ± 3.6 years, P < .001). Postoperative outcomes were similar after the first aTSAs between groups with similar proportions achieving the MCID, SCB, and PASS (all P > .05). The 2nd TSAs between groups were similar preoperatively, but aTSA/rTSA had superior outcome scores, overhead motion, and active abduction compared to patients that underwent aTSA/aTSA. There were no differences in active ER and IR scores or complication rates between groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with RCI-GHOA have excellent clinical outcomes after either aTSA/aTSA or aTSA/rTSA.

Collapse

Key Words

• Clinical outcome
• Inflammatory arthritis, Rotator cuff
• Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
• Shoulder replacement

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder/adverse effects
• Rotator Cuff/surgery
• Shoulder Joint/surgery
• Treatment Outcome
• Retrospective Studies
• Osteoarthritis/surgery
• Osteoarthritis/etiology
• Range of Motion, Articular

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Lacie M Turnbull Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute, 3450 Hull Road, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA
Kevin A Hao College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Victoria E Bindi College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Jonathan O Wright Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute, 3450 Hull Road, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA
Thomas W Wright Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute, 3450 Hull Road, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA
Kevin W Farmer Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute, 3450 Hull Road, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA
Terrie Vasilopoulos Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute, 3450 Hull Road, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Aimee M Struk Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute, 3450 Hull Road, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA
Bradley S Schoch Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
Joseph J King Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute, 3450 Hull Road, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 155° neck-shaft angle inlay implant design without reattachment of the subscapularis tendon results in satisfactory functional internal rotation and no instability: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to use the Activities of Daily Living which require Internal Rotation (ADLIR) questionnaire to assess the functional internal rotation in patients who had undergone reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) without reattachment of the subscapularis (SSc) tendon at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The secondary aim was to report the objective range of motion (ROM) and the rate of postoperative instability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive primary RSA procedures without reattachment of the SSc tendon that were performed using a Delta Xtend prosthesis (an inlay system with a 155° neck-shaft angle) between January 2015 and December 2020 were identified to ensure a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were contacted and requested to fill in several questionnaires, including the ADLIR and Auto-Constant scores.

RESULTS

In total, 210 patients met the inclusion criteria; among those patients, 187 could be contacted and 151 completed questionnaires (response rate: 81%). The SSc tendon was fully detached without repair in all cases, and a superolateral approach was used in 130 (86%) cases. The median follow-up was 4.5 years (range: 2.0-7.6). At final follow-up, the mean ADLIR score was 88/100 (interquartile range (IQR): 81-96). The median level reached in internal rotation was the 3rd lumbar vertebra (IQR: lumbosacral region-12th thoracic vertebra). Of the 210 eligible patients, one required a revision for a dislocation within the first month after primary surgery. With regards to regression analysis with ADLIR score as the outcome, none of the factors were associated with the ADLIR score, although age and smoking approached significance (0.0677 and 0.0594, respectively). None of the explanatory variables were associated with ROM in internal rotation (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that satisfactory ADLIR scores and internal rotation ROM were obtained at mid-term follow-up after RSA leaving the SSc detached. Leaving the SSc detached also did not lead to high instability rates; only one out of 210 prostheses was revised for dislocation within the first month after primary surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

Functional assessment and quality of life of patients after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the late follow-up period

BACKGROUND

Due to the systematically increasing number of shoulder replacement procedures among older people, the need to assess their quality of life is becoming more and more important.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to functionally assess the shoulder joint and the quality of life of patients before and after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).

METHODS

The observational study included 15 patients after the rTSA procedure (randomly selected). The quality of life and shoulder joint function before and after rTSA were assessed using the following scales: SF-36, Constant-Murley Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Scale (DASH) and the University of California-Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale (UCLA scale) and Simple Shoulder Test (SST).

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences (p< 0.001) between measurements in the overall scores of the SF-36 questionnaire. Statistically significant differences (p< 0.001) were found between measurements in terms of the Constant-Murley, DASH, UCLA and SST scales results.

CONCLUSIONS

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty significantly improved the patients' quality of life and the functional condition of the operated limb.

Medium-term results of inlay vs. onlay humeral components for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a New Zealand Joint Registry study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare medium-term results of inlay and onlay humeral components in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Specifically, we report differences in revision rate and functional outcomes between the 2 designs.

METHODS

The 3 most used inlay (in-RSA) and onlay (on-RSA) implants by volume from the New Zealand Joint Registry were included in the study. In-RSA was defined as having a humeral tray that recessed within the metaphyseal bone, whereas on-RSA was defined as having a humeral tray that rested on the epiphyseal osteotomy surface. The primary outcome was revision up to 8 years postsurgery. Secondary outcomes included the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), implant survival, and revision cause for in-RSA and on-RSA as well as individual prostheses.

RESULTS

There were 6707 patients (5736 in-RSA; 971 on-RSA) included in the study. For all causes, in-RSA demonstrated a lower revision rate compared to on-RSA (revision rate/100 component years: in-RSA 0.665, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.569-0.768; on-RSA 1.010, 95% CI 0.673-1.415). However, the mean 6-month OSS was higher for the on-RSA group (mean difference 2.20, 95% CI 1.37-3.03; P < .001). However, this was not clinically significant. At 5 years, there were no statistically or clinically significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to the OSS.

CONCLUSION

The medium-term survival of in-RSA was higher than that of on-RSA. However, functional outcomes at 6 months were better for on-RSA compared to in-RSA. Further follow-up is required to understand the long-term survivorship and functional outcomes between these designs.

Clinical outcomes of anatomical versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis, an intact rotator cuff, and limited forward elevation

Aims

Both anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA and rTSA) provide functional improvements. A reported benefit of aTSA is better range of motion (ROM). However, it is not clear which procedure provides better outcomes in patients with limited foward elevation (FE). The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of aTSA and rTSA in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), an intact rotator cuff, and limited FE.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of a single institution's prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database for TSAs undertaken between 2007 and 2020. A total of 344 aTSAs and 163 rTSAs, which were performed in patients with OA and an intact rotator cuff with a minimum follow-up of two years, were included. Using the definition of preoperative stiffness as passive FE ≤ 105°, three cohorts were matched 1:1 by age, sex, and follow-up: stiff aTSAs (85) to non-stiff aTSAs (85); stiff rTSAs (74) to non-stiff rTSAs (74); and stiff rTSAs (64) to stiff aTSAs (64). We the compared ROMs, outcome scores, and complication and revision rates.

Results

Compared with non-stiff aTSAs, stiff aTSAs had poorer passive FE and active external rotation (ER), whereas there were no significant postoperative differences between stiff rTSAs and non-stiff rTSAs. There were no significant differences in preoperative function when comparing stiff aTSAs with stiff rTSAs. However, stiff rTSAs had significantly greater postoperative active and passive FE (p = 0.001 and 0.004, respectively), and active abduction (p = 0.001) compared with stiff aTSAs. The outcome scores were significantly more favourable in stiff rTSAs for the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California, Los Angeles score, and the Constant score, compared with stiff aTSAs. When comparing the proportion of stiff aTSAs versus stiff rTSAs that exceeded the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit, stiff rTSAs achieved both at greater rates for all measurements except active ER. The complication rate did not significantly differ between stiff aTSAs and stiff rTSAs, but there was a significantly higher rate of revision surgery in stiff aTSAs (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

Postoperative overhead ROM, outcome scores, and rates of revision surgery favour the use of a rTSA rather than aTSA in patients with glenohumeral OA, an intact rotator cuff and limited FE, with similar rotational ROM in these two groups.

Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Aged Over 70 Without a Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the revision rates, complications, and outcomes in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA) performed for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis in patients aged over 70 years without a full-thickness rotator cuff tear.

Materials and Methods

We performed a systematic literature search identifying comparative studies meeting the above patient criteria and published from January 2010 to May 2022 from 3 databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. We performed the systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and the study was prospectively registered on PROSPERO.

Results

From the 1798 studies identified from the initial literature search, 4 met our inclusion criteria. Two thousand seven hundred thirty-one shoulder arthroplasties (1472 aTSA and 1259 rTSA) were evaluated with a minimum follow up of 2 years. A statistically significant lower revision rate was observed in rTSA compared to aTSA (odds ratio [OR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30, 0.84, p < .05). No significant difference was noted between aTSA and rTSA in overall complication rate (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.34, 2.86, p = .97) while aTSA displayed a statistically significant improved postoperative Constant-Murley score [aTSA: 80(75; 82), rTSA: 68(66; 76.5), p < .001].

Conclusion

Higher revision rates were identified following aTSA in our study population, although admittedly this is within retrospective studies. aTSA displayed equal functional results and postoperative complications compared to rTSA in patients over 70 without a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. Given these similar results a shoulder surgeon must carefully consider each patient individually prior to deciding the optimal form of arthroplasty to offer.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty renders better clinical scores at a minimum follow-up of two years for patients with no rotator cuff deficiency operated by the deltopectoral approach

PURPOSE

The purpose of this multi-centre study was to report outcomes of a large cohort of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) at a minimum follow-up of two years and to determine patient and surgical factors that influence postoperative outcomes. The hypothesis was that surgical indication, surgical approach, and implant design would affect clinical outcomes significantly.

METHODS

The authors reviewed records of 743 RSAs in patients with primary osteoarthritis (OA) with or without rotator cuff (RC) tears, secondary OA due to RC tears, and irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (mRCT). The deltopectoral (DP) approach was used in 540 and the anterosuperior (AS) approach in 203. Pre- and postoperative Constant scores (CS) were recorded. Multivariable linear analyses were performed to determine if CS was associated with indications for surgery, surgical approach, or implant design.

RESULTS

Of the 743 shoulders, 193 (25.7%) were lost to follow-up, 16 (2.1%) died, and 33 (4.4%) were revised, leaving 501 for analysis. At a mean follow-up of 3.2 ± 0.9 years, net improvement in CS was 29.2 ± 17.0. Multivariable analyses revealed that postoperative CS decreased with age and was worse in shoulders that had preoperative rotator cuff deficiency and in shoulders operated by the AS approach. Multivariable analyses also revealed worse net improvement in shoulders operated for secondary OA due to RC tears or for irreparable mRCT, as well as shoulders operated by the AS approach.

CONCLUSION

This large multi-centre study confirms that, at two or more years following RSA, Constant scores are not associated with implant design, but rather with rotator cuff deficiency and surgical approach. Multivariable analysis revealed that postoperative CS was worse for shoulders with preoperative rotator cuff deficiency and for shoulders operated by the AS approach. Multivariable analysis also revealed that net improvement in CS was worse in shoulders treated for secondary OA due to RC tears and for shoulders with irreparable mRCT, as well as for shoulders operated by the AS approach.

Comparing Outcomes After Referral to Physical Therapy for Patients With Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis Based on the Radiographic Osteoarthritis Severity: A Retrospective Analysis

Introduction Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) is a common cause of musculoskeletal pain (MSP) that can frequently lead to pain and functional disability in patients throughout the world. GHOA can be managed with conservative or surgical interventions, although conservative interventions, such as physical therapy (PT), are generally first-line interventions depending on the severity of GHOA. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to examine how conventional PT impacts outcomes for patients with GHOA based on the severity of radiographic GHOA findings. Methods This study is a retrospective chart review of patients who were referred to PT for MSP and received PT in the outpatient setting between 2016 and 2022. Inclusion criteria were patients who received PT in the outpatient setting, received PT for MSP, had shoulder radiograph imaging within two years of initial PT evaluation, had more than one PT visit (i.e. attended a follow-up session after initial evaluation), and did not have a history of shoulder surgery. Primary outcome measures were pain, abduction active range-of-motion (AROM), and disability via the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH). Patients were divided into the No GHOA group (n=104), Mild GHOA group (n=61), and Moderate/Severe GHOA group (n=55) based on the radiographic GHOA severity. Results All included patients (n=220) had a mean age of 62.2 ± 12.4 years old with a mean number of PT visits of 7.8 ± 4.5 visits. There was initially a significant difference in the magnitude of pain improvement between the three groups based on radiographic severity of GHOA (Kruskal-Wallis H=6.038; p=0.049); however, post hoc testing revealed no significant difference between any of the three groups for pain improvement (p=0.061 to p=1.000). There was also no significant difference in the magnitude of abduction AROM improvement between the three groups based on the radiographic severity of GHOA (Kruskal-Wallis H=2.887; p=0.236). Finally, there was no significant difference in the magnitude of disability improvement via the Quick DASH between the three groups based on the radiographic severity of GHOA (Kruskal-Wallis H=0.156; p=0.925). Conclusion Patients with GHOA referred to PT experience small but statistically significant short-term improvements in pain, abduction AROM, and disability regardless of GHOA radiographic severity. There is no significant association between the magnitude of clinical improvement and the severity of radiographic GHOA. However, despite statistically significant improvements in pain, only patients with mild GHOA experienced clinically significant improvements in pain. Patients with GHOA, regardless of severity, may or may not experience clinically significant improvements in disability after PT.

Outcomes of anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients over the age of 70: a systematic review

Background

Both anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) reliably improve pain and function for a variety of indications. However, there remain concerns about these procedures among elderly patients due to their general health, the potential for lesser functional gain, and the possible need for revision at an even older age. The purpose of this review is to compare the clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and complications of ATSA and RTSA among patients older than 70 years.

Methods

A systematic review was performed using searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The inclusion criteria were studies with patients older than 70 years who were treated with a primary ATSA or RTSA and clinical results reported at a minimum of 2 years. All indications for primary RTSA except for tumor were included. Outcomes of interest included patient-reported outcomes (PROs), range of motion, patient satisfaction, radiographic changes, complication and revision rates, and implant survival.

Results

A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. At a mean follow-up of 3.4 years for ATSA and 3.1 years for RTSA, there were significant improvements in pain, range of motion, and PROs for both prostheses. Patients who underwent ATSA generally had better motion and functional outcomes compared to those who underwent RTSA, though these comparisons were made across different indications for arthroplasty. The satisfaction rate was 90.9% after ATSA and 90.8% after RTSA. Furthermore, 10.2% of ATSA patients and 9.9% of RTSA patients experienced a surgical complication, whereas 2.3% of ATSA and 2.2% of RTSA patients underwent a revision. Secondary rotator cuff tear was the most common complication after ATSA, occurring in 3.7% of patients, but only 1.1% of patients required revision surgery. Both ATSA and RTSA implant survivorship was reported to range from 93.1% to 98.9% at 5- and 8-year follow-up, respectively. Patient mortality was estimated to be 19.3% with a mean time to death of 6.1 years.

Conclusions

Elderly patients with primary osteoarthritis and an intact rotator cuff can have predictable pain relief, restoration of functional range of motion, and significant improvement in PROs after ATSA with low complication rates. Secondary rotator cuff failure and revision arthroplasty occur infrequently at early to mid-term follow-up. Although elderly patients who underwent ATSA generally had better functional outcomes compared to those who underwent RTSA for differing indications, patient satisfaction after both procedures were similar.

Update on Shoulder Arthroplasties with Emphasis on Imaging

Shoulder pain and dysfunction may significantly impact quality of life. If conservative measures fail, advanced disease is frequently treated with shoulder arthroplasty, which is currently the third most common joint replacement surgery following the hip and knee. The main indications for shoulder arthroplasty include primary osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, inflammatory arthritis, osteonecrosis, proximal humeral fracture sequelae, severely dislocated proximal humeral fractures, and advanced rotator cuff disease. Several types of anatomic arthroplasties are available, such as humeral head resurfacing and hemiarthroplasties, as well as total anatomic arthroplasties. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasties, which reverse the normal ball-and-socket geometry of the shoulder, are also available. Each of these arthroplasty types has specific indications and unique complications in addition to general hardware-related or surgery-related complications. Imaging-including radiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and, occasionally, nuclear medicine imaging-has a key role in the initial pre-operative evaluation for shoulder arthroplasty, as well as in post-surgical follow-up. This review paper aims to discuss important pre-operative imaging considerations, including rotator cuff evaluation, glenoid morphology, and glenoid version, as well as to review post-operative imaging of the various types of shoulder arthroplasties, to include normal post-operative appearances as well as imaging findings of complications.

Incidence and 30- and 90-day readmission rates after primary shoulder arthroplasty in the United States: an analysis using the National Readmissions Database

BACKGROUND

The field of shoulder arthroplasty has experienced a substantial increase in the number of procedures performed annually and a shift toward more common implantation of reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSAs). Same-day discharge is perceived as beneficial for most patients as well as our health care system, and the number of shoulder procedures performed as same-day surgery has increased substantially. However, the potential benefits of same-day discharge after shoulder arthroplasty may be negatively influenced by unexpected readmissions. As such, an in-depth analysis of readmission rates after primary shoulder arthroplasty is particularly timely.

METHODS

The National Readmissions Database was queried for primary shoulder arthroplasty procedures performed in the United States between 2016 and 2018. National incidences were calculated, and indications, patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, facility characteristics, and rates and causes of 30- and 90-day readmissions were determined for all procedures and compared between anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), anatomic hemiarthroplasty (HA), and RSA.

RESULTS

During the study period, 336,672 primary shoulder arthroplasties were performed (37% TSAs, 57% RSAs, and 6% HAs). In 2018, national incidences per 100,000 inhabitants were 22.64 for RSA, 12.70 for TSA, and 1.50 for HA. The utilization of these procedures between 2016 and 2018 increased for RSA, decreased for HA, and remained constant for TSA, but these changes did not reach the level of statistical significance. The average all-cause 30-day readmission rates were 3.63%, 1.92%, and 3.81% for RSA, TSA, and HA, respectively, and the average all-cause 90-day readmission rates were 7.76%, 4.37%, and 9.18%, respectively. For both RSA and HA, the most common surgical diagnosis for 30-day and 90-day readmissions was dislocation (0.45% and 0.99%, respectively, for RSA and 0.21% and 0.67%, respectively, for HA). For TSA, the most common surgical diagnosis for 30-day readmission was infection (0.11%); however, this was surpassed by dislocation (0.28%) at 90 days.

CONCLUSION

RSA surpassed TSA as the most frequently performed shoulder arthroplasty procedure in the United States between 2016 and 2018. During this period, the 90-day readmission rate was not negligible, with dislocation and infection as the leading orthopedic causes of readmission.

Shoulder structure and function: The impact of osteoarthritis and rehabilitation strategies

STUDY DESIGN

Invited review.

BACKGROUND

Shoulder osteoarthritis can result in significant functional deficits. To improve diagnosis and treatment, we must better understand the impact of osteoarthritis on shoulder biomechanics and the known mechanical benefits of currently available treatments.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to present up-to-date data on the effects of osteoarthritis and rehabilitation on the biomechanical parameters contributing to shoulder function. With this goal, we also reviewed the anatomy and the ranges of motion of the shoulder.

METHODS

A search of electronic databases was conducted. All study designs were included to inform this qualitative, narrative literature review.

RESULTS

This review describes the biomechanics of the shoulder, the impact of osteoarthritis on shoulder function, and the treatment of shoulder osteoarthritis with an emphasis on rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

The shoulder is important for the completion of activities of daily living, and osteoarthritis of the shoulder can significantly reduce shoulder motion and arm function. Although shoulder rehabilitation is an integral treatment modality to improve pain and function in shoulder osteoarthritis, few high-quality studies have investigated the effects and benefits of shoulder physical and occupational therapies. To advance the fields of therapy and rehabilitation, future studies investigating the effects of therapy intensity, therapy duration, and the relative benefits of therapy subtypes on shoulder biomechanics and function are necessary.