Risk factors for degenerative, symptomatic rotator cuff tears: a case-control study

Development and validation of a sport-specific shoulder score questionnaire for functional fitness and weightlifting athletes

BACKGROUND

So-called scores are a frequently used evaluation system in clinical examinations to assess the function or limitations of a joint such as the shoulder. However, research indicates that these general scores often have limited validity for specific patient groups, such as athletes. Known as a demanding patient population, athletes have unique needs. We address this by introducing a sport-specific shoulder score questionnaire developed specifically for functional fitness and weightlifting populations.

METHODS

Utilizing MRIs (magnet resonance imaging) and clinical examinations from a group of 51 athletes in the functional fitness and weightlifting field who are experiencing shoulder pain, we initially validated a sport-specific score system. With these data and an approach via PCA (principal component analyze), the weights for the questionnaire were calculated, Later, we conducted clinical examinations and interviews with 92 athletes from the same field, comprising both athletes with no clinical issues and athletes with shoulder pain. With the help of the N.=92 individuals, we validated the questionnaire and adjusted the weighting of the questions where necessary. The principle of the PCA was to show which questions were most frequently answered with a high score by those athletes with structural damage in the MRI or positive clinical tests.

RESULTS

A total of 143 athletes were analyzed, all having undergone clinical examinations with a primary focus on rotator cuff and long head of the biceps (LHB) pathologies, as well as glenohumeral instability. In N.=51 an additional MRI was available. The sensitivity was found to be 89%, precision was 67%, and specificity was 42%. The calculated F1 score was 0.76. The scoring threshold for the questionnaire was set at 22 out of 100.

CONCLUSIONS

This score offers a cost-effective, risk-free tool for identifying shoulder pathologies in weightlifting athletes, boasting a high sensitivity of 89%. It is intended to be an extension of existing score questionnaires that are more focused on a specific, very demanding patient population such as weightlifting and functional fitness athletes.

Risk Factor Prediction and Categorization for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: A Classification and Regression Tree Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to apply classification and regression tree analysis to determine factors associated with glenohumeral osteoarthritis and establish specific cutoff points for risk factors based on this methodology.

DESIGN

The cross-sectional study included 3383 participants with shoulder pain. Cases were selected for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Patients with other shoulder pathologies were included as controls. Thirty-three potential risk factors were assessed. The classification and regression tree analysis was used to determine the highest-ranked risk factors associated with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was then performed using the cutoff points obtained from the classification and regression tree analysis.

RESULTS

The classification and regression tree analysis showed that age and body mass index were the two most significant risk factors for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that age categories ≥31 to < 58 yrs (odds ratio = 8.92), ≥58 to < 64 yrs (odds ratio = 20.20), and ≥64 yrs (odds ratio = 42.20), and body mass index categories ≥25-30 kg/m 2 (odds ratio = 1.47) and ≥30 kg/m 2 (odds ratio = 1.71) had higher odds of developing glenohumeral osteoarthritis compared with age <31 yrs and body mass index <25 kg/m 2 .

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first study to use classification and regression tree analysis to evaluate significant risk factors for glenohumeral osteoarthritis and establish cutoff points for increased risk. The findings present age categories that are distinct from the arbitrary age groups used in previous studies.

The effect of smoking on outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The effect of smoking status on clinical outcomes in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has not been thoroughly characterized. We sought to compare pain and functional outcomes, complications, and revision-free survivorship between current smokers, former smokers, and nonsmokers undergoing primary rTSA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database from 2004-2020 to identify patients who underwent primary rTSA. Three cohorts were created based on smoking status: current smokers, former smokers, and nonsmokers. Outcome scores (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index [SPADI], Simple Shoulder Test [SST], American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], University of California, Los Angeles [UCLA], and Constant), range of motion (external rotation, forward elevation, abduction, and internal rotation), and shoulder strength (external rotation and forward elevation) evaluated at 2-4-year follow-up were compared between cohorts. The incidence of complication and revision-free implant survivorship were evaluated.

RESULTS

We included 676 primary rTSAs, including 38 current smokers (44 ± 47 pack-years), 84 former smokers who quit on average 20 ± 14 years (range: 0.5-57 years) prior to surgery (38 ± 32 pack-years), and 544 nonsmokers. At 2-4-year follow-up, current smokers had less favorable SPADI, SST, ASES scores, UCLA scores, and Constant scores compared to former smokers and nonsmokers. On multivariable analysis, current smokers had less favorable SPADI, SST, ASES score, UCLA score, and Constant score compared to nonsmokers. There were no significant differences between cohorts in complication rate and revision-free survivorship.

CONCLUSION

Our data showed that current smokers may have poorer functional outcomes after rTSA compared to former smokers and nonsmokers, despite the incidence of complications and revision surgery not differing significantly between cohorts.

Does the Relationship Between Preoperative Function and Achievement of Clinically Important Benchmarks of Success After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Depend on Outcome Assessment Design?

BACKGROUND

A variety of clinically important benchmarks of success (CIBS) have been defined for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to quantify success. However, it is unclear how the preoperative status of the patient influences their likelihood of achieving each CIBS.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What proportion of patients achieve commonly used CIBS after TSA? (2) Is there a relationship between a patients' preoperative function and their probability of achieving different CIBS? (3) Does there exist preoperative ranges for each outcome measure that are associated with greater achievement of CIBS?

METHODS

We retrospectively queried a multicenter shoulder arthroplasty database for primary anatomic TSA (aTSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA). A total of 2041 aTSAs and 3205 rTSAs were included. The mean ± SD age at time of surgery was 66 ± 9 years for aTSAs and 72 ± 8 years for rTSAs. In all, 51% (1049 of 2041) of aTSAs and 61% (1955 of 3205) of rTSAs were in patients who were women. For aTSAs, osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff was the most common preoperative diagnosis (92% [1869 of 2041]). For rTSAs, the most common preoperative diagnoses included rotator cuff tear arthropathy (40% [1280 of 3205]), osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff (24% [780 of 3205]), osteoarthritis with a torn rotator cuff (20% [632 of 3205]), and massive rotator cuff tear (10% [309 of 3205]). Outcomes were evaluated at latest follow-up (aTSA 61 ± 36 months, rTSA 47 ± 26 months) and consisted of ROM (abduction, forward elevation, external and internal rotation) as well as the most commonly used outcome scores: the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and the Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart (SAS) score. The CIBS that we evaluated included the minimum clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), minimum clinically important percentage of maximal possible improvement (MCI-%MPI), and substantial clinically important percentage of maximal possible improvement (SCI-%MPI). Prosthesis-specific anchor-based CIBS were adopted from prior publications on patients from this database. Multivariable regression was performed to identify the relationship between preoperative outcome measures and achievement of CIBS. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to determine whether thresholds in preoperative outcome measures were associated with achieving CIBS.

RESULTS

For all ROM measures and outcome scores, poorer preoperative ROM was associated with greater odds of achieving the MCID and SCB but lower odds of achieving the PASS. For the SST and the two scores without ceiling effects (the Constant and SAS scores), poorer preoperative outcome scores were associated with greater odds of achieving the MCI-%MPI and SCI-%MPI, but no association was demonstrated for the ASES, SPADI, and UCLA scores. Graphical analysis demonstrated that patients with greater preoperative ROM and outcome scores had a lower probability of achieving the MCID and SCB but a higher probability of achieving the PASS. For outcome scores with known ceiling effects, patients with more favorable preoperative outcome scores were more likely to achieve the MCI-%MPI and SCI-%MPI than the MCID and SCB, respectively. For outcome scores without ceiling effects, patients undergoing aTSA were more likely to achieve the MCID, MCI-%MPI, and the SCI-%MPI than the SCB, but no clear trend was identified for patients undergoing rTSA. On ROC curve analysis, identified thresholds were reasonably accurate (area under the curve > 0.7) for achievement of measures of absolute improvement (the MCID and SCB), but not for absolute postoperative status (the PASS) or relative improvement (the MCI-%MPI and SCI-%MPI).

CONCLUSION

While most patients reported being "much better" (aTSA 75%, rTSA 76%) or "better" (aTSA 15%, rTSA 18%) compared with before surgery, 10% of aTSAs and 6% of rTSAs were either "unchanged" or "worse." Patients' likelihood of achieving CIBS depends in part on their baseline function and whether success is defined as absolute improvement, absolute postoperative status, or relative improvement. Patients with more favorable preoperative status are more likely to achieve CIBS that evaluate relative improvement (the MCI-%MPI and SCI-%MPI) than absolute improvement (the MCID and SCB). Future studies are needed to determine which individual CIBS or combinations thereof most accurately represent clinically relevant benefit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Risk factors associated with degenerative glenohumeral osteoarthritis

Objective

Glenohumeral (GH) osteoarthritis (OA) is the third most common large joint disease, after hip and knee OA. This study aimed to identify risk factors for GH OA.

Methods

We used data from the Dallas Shoulder cohort, including individuals aged 40-85. Those with confirmed GH OA based on X-ray were cases, and those without were controls. Univariate, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and multivariate analyses identified risk factors, including age, body mass index (BMI), sex, work-related shoulder problems, shoulder disability, dislocation, previous trauma, surgery, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, depression, heart disease, OA, night pain and overall sleep quality.

Results

A total of 1827 cases and 1556 controls were identified for GH OA. In univariate analysis, significant associations with GH OA were found for increasing age (>40 to ≤50: OR 3.29, 95% CI 2.44 to 4.45; >50 to ≤60: OR 5.90, 95% CI 4.49 to 7.77; >60 to ≤70: OR 12.18, 95% CI 9.22 to 16.08 and >70: OR 16.54, 95% CI 12.47 to 21.94), higher BMI (≤19: OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.04; >25 to ≤30: OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.86; >30 to ≤35: OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.54 to 2.22 and >35: OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.45), prior shoulder injury (OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.50), shoulder surgery history (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.87), shoulder pain at night (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.70) and hypertension (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.81). In multivariate analysis, significant associations remained for age (>40 to ≤50: OR 2.99, 95% CI 2.21 to 4.06; >50 to ≤60: OR 5.48, 95% CI 4.14 to 7.23; >60 to ≤70: OR 11.22, 95% CI 8.44 to 14.88 and >70: OR 16.65, 95% CI 12.45 to 22.17), BMI (≤19: OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.20; >25 to ≤30: OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.77; >30 to ≤35: OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.09 and >35: OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.55) and previous shoulder trauma (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.94).

Conclusion

We identified increasing age and higher BMI as factors associated with GH OA. Due to the large sample size, many risk factors were assessed. Since the shoulder is not a weight-bearing joint, the BMI-GH OA link is likely molecular and systemic, warranting further investigation.

Level of evidence

Prognostic level III.

The effect of socioeconomic status on clinical outcomes and implant survivorship after primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Low socioeconomic status has been shown to contribute to poor outcomes in patients undergoing joint replacement surgery. However, there is a paucity of studies investigating shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of socioeconomic status on baseline and postoperative outcome scores and implant survivorship after anatomic and reverse primary total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected single-institution database was performed to identify patients who underwent primary TSA. Zip codes were collected and converted to Area Deprivation Index (ADI) scores. We performed a correlation analysis between national ADI scores and preoperative, postoperative, and preoperative to postoperative improvement in range of motion (ROM), shoulder strength, and functional outcome scores in patients with minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were additionally grouped into groups according to their national ADI. Achievement of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) and revision-free survivorship were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1148 procedures including 415 anatomic and 733 reverse total shoulder arthroplasties with a mean age of 64 ± 8.2 and 69.9 ± 8.0 years, respectively, were included. The mean follow-up was 6.3 ± 3.6 years for anatomic and 4.9 ± 2.7 years for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. We identified a weak negative correlation between national ADI and most functional outcome scores and ROM preoperatively (R range 0.07-0.16), postoperatively (R range 0.09-0.14), and preoperative to postoperative improvement (R range 0.01-0.17). Thus, greater area deprivation was weakly associated with poorer function preoperatively, poorer final outcomes, and poorer improvement in outcomes. There was no difference in the proportion of each ADI group achieving MCID, SCB, and PASS in the anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty cohort. However, in the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty cohort, the proportion of patients achieving MCID, SCB, and PASS decreased with greater deprivation. There was no difference in survivorship between ADI groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a negative effect of low socioeconomic status on baseline and postoperative patient outcomes and ROM; however, the correlations were relatively weak. Patients that reside in socioeconomically deprived areas have poorer functional outcomes before and after TSA and achieve less improvement from surgery. We should strive to identify modifiable factors to improve the success of TSA in socioeconomically deprived areas.

The effect of smoking on functional outcomes and implant survival of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty

Aims

We sought to compare functional outcomes and survival between non-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers who underwent anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) in a large cohort of patients.

Methods

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database was performed between August 1991 and September 2020 to identify patients who underwent primary aTSA. Patients were excluded for preoperative diagnoses of fracture, infection, or oncological disease. Three cohorts were created based on smoking status: non-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers. Outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant-Murley score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), University of California, Los Angeles activity scale (UCLA)), range of motion (external rotation (ER), forward elevation (FE), internal rotation, abduction), and shoulder strength (ER, FE) evaluated at two- to four-year follow-up were compared between cohorts. Evaluation of revision-free survival was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method to final follow-up.

Results

We included 428 primary aTSAs with a mean follow-up of 2.4 years (SD 0.6). Our cohort consisted of 251 non-smokers, 138 former smokers who quit a mean 21 years (SD 14) prior to surgery (25 pack-years (SD 22)), and 39 current smokers (23 pack-years (SD 20)). At two- to four-year follow-up, former smokers had less favourable SPADI, SST, and FE strength compared to non-smokers, and current smokers had less favourable SPADI, SST, ASES score, UCLA score, Constant-Murley score, FE, abduction, and ER strength compared to non-smokers. Non-smokers exhibited higher revision-free survival rates at two, five, eight, and ten years postoperatively compared to former smokers and current smokers, who had similar rates.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that smoking has a negative effect on aTSA functional outcomes that may persist even after quitting.

The significance of subjective mechanical symptoms in rotator cuff pathology

BACKGROUND

The presence of subjective mechanical symptoms, such as clicking or popping, is common in patients presenting for shoulder pain and dysfunction, with unclear clinical significance. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether subjective mechanical symptoms in the affected shoulder were associated with full-thickness rotator cuff tearing in a consecutive, prospective cohort of patients undergoing shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for suspected rotator cuff pathology.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed of 100 consecutive patients with suspected rotator cuff tendinopathy and/or tearing who underwent shoulder MRI. The presence of subjective shoulder mechanical symptoms, including clicking or popping, was documented prior to MRI. Indications for MRI included weakness on isolated testing of rotator cuff muscle(s) or symptoms refractory to conservative treatment including at least a 6-week course of physical therapy. The primary outcome variable was the presence of full-thickness rotator cuff tearing; secondary outcome variables included any (full-thickness or partial-thickness) rotator cuff tearing and biceps long head subluxation. Radiographic parameters, including critical shoulder angle, Goutallier grade, tear retraction, and tear size were quantified. One patient was lost to follow-up, and 99 patients completed MRI imaging.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 60% of patients reported subjective mechanical symptoms in the affected shoulder. Full-thickness rotator cuff tearing was identified in 42% of patients, any rotator cuff tearing in 69% of patients, and biceps long head subluxation in 14% of patients. Subjective mechanical symptoms were not associated with full-thickness rotator cuff tearing, any rotator cuff tearing, biceps long head subluxation, critical shoulder angle, Goutallier grade, tear size, or tear retraction. Older age was associated with full-thickness and any rotator cuff tearing. As a diagnostic test for full-thickness rotator cuff tearing, subjective shoulder mechanical symptoms has a sensitivity of 64%, a specificity of 44%, and Youden's index of 0.08, consistent with poor diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjective mechanical symptoms in the affected shoulder are a common complaint in patients with suspected rotator cuff pathology. Patients may be reassured that a sensation of clicking or popping alone does not necessarily entail structural shoulder derangement.

Rotator Cuff Injury: Pathogenesis, Biomechanics, and Repair

Anterior Rotator cuff tears are one of the most common surgically addressed disorders, as the tears in the tendon can affect anyone regardless of risk factors or activity level. The rotator cuff is responsible for most of the shoulder motion, hence the tendon-bone interface experiences immense stress making it incredibly prone to failure. Rotator cuff tendon tears can either occur due to trauma or natural degeneration of the rotator cuff. To help mitigate effects of high stress on the rotator cuff tendon-bone interface, the rotator cuff is intrinsically designed to redistribute stress through protective mechanisms, such as the rotator crescent or coronal-transverse force. But when the tear goes through the intrinsic protective mechanisms, the glenohumeral joint is left unstable and thus is no longer capable of its normal range of motion. Location, size, and type of rotator cuff tendon tears are the strongest indicators for interventional therapy. Surgical therapies demonstrate low success rates, as seen by the significantly high recurrence rate of rotator cuff reinjury following initial repair. This is due to extrinsically healing of rotator cuff tendons, instead of the more intrinsic healing, which causes rotator cuff tendons to not undergo the necessary biomechanical remodeling to prevent reinjury leading to a mechanically and functionally inferior healed tendon. In this article, we thoroughly discussed the underlying pathophysiology of rotator cuff tears from onset to repair to healing, demonstrating that rotator cuff tendon healing is an intrinsically flawed process, irrespective of the risk factors, occurrence of rotator cuff tears, or surgical treatment. Rotator cuff healing can only be successful if rotator cuff tendon repair surgery is augmented with biologics to promote a successful intrinsic healing environment.

Disparities in Rotator Cuff Tear Progression Definitions and Rates: A Systematic Review

Background

While rotator cuff tears are prevalent in the general population, the natural history of this disease is unclear. Understanding rotator cuff tear progression is crucial for refining surgical indications and evaluating the necessity of early interventions. This study presents an in-depth analysis of the existing literature on the definitions and progression rates of rotator cuff tears, aiming to enhance clinical decision making and patient outcomes.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, using Medline (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), and Web of Science databases on January 12, 2023. Articles were identified as relevant to the natural history and progression of asymptomatic and symptomatic partial-thickness (PT) and full-thickness (FT) rotator cuff tears. Those written in English reporting rotator cuff progression rates of tears in adults, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound, were included. After reviewing the articles, the data on the rates of tear progression and associated risk factors were extracted, compiled, and analyzed. The risk of bias was determined using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results

Twenty-one articles met the inclusion criteria, with 1,831 tears included. The progression rate for all partial thickness tears was 26.7% ± 12.8% at an average follow-up of 2.2 ± 0.9 years, with 5 definitions for tear progression. For FT tears, the progression rate was 54.9% ± 18.6% at a follow-up time of 3.0 ± 2.0 years, with 8 definitions for tear enlargement. A significant difference (p < 0.0001) was found between the progression rates of PT and FT tears. Patients who were initially asymptomatic and became symptomatic had higher progression rates (33%-63%) than those who remained asymptomatic (4%-38%).

Conclusion

Further research would benefit by identifying a clinically relevant and standardized definition of rotator cuff tear progression, to describe the natural history of rotator cuff disease, making results more comparable and optimizing treatment planning.

Level of Evidence

Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Does preoperative forward elevation weakness affect clinical outcomes in anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis and intact rotator cuff?

BACKGROUND

This study sought to determine if preoperative forward elevation (FE) weakness affects outcomes of anatomic (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for patients with rotator cuff-intact glenohumeral osteoarthritis (RCI-GHOA).

METHODS

A retrospective review of a single institution's prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database was performed between 2007 and 2020, including 333 aTSAs and 155 rTSAs for primary RCI-GHOA with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Defining preoperative weakness as FE strength ≤4.9 lb (2.2 kg), three cohorts were matched 1:1:1 by age, sex, and follow-up: weak (n=82) to normal aTSAs, weak (n=44) to normal rTSAs, and weak aTSAs (n=61) to weak rTSAs. Compared outcomes included range of motion, outcome scores, and complication and revision rates at latest follow-up.

RESULTS

Weak aTSAs and weak rTSAs achieved similar postoperative outcome measures to normal aTSAs and normal rTSAs, respectively (P>0.05). Compared to weak rTSAs, weak aTSAs achieved superior postoperative passive (P=0.006) and active external rotation (ER) (P=0.014) but less favorable postoperative Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (P=0.032), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (P=0.024), and University of California, Los Angeles scores (P=0.008). Weak aTSAs achieved the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at a lower rate for abduction (P=0.045 and P=0.003) and FE (P=0.011 and P=0.001). Weak aTSAs had a higher revision rate (P=0.025) but a similar complication rate (P=0.291) compared to weak rTSAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with RCI-GHOA and preoperative FE weakness obtain postoperative outcomes similar to patients with normal preoperative strength after either aTSA or rTSA. Preoperatively, weak aTSAs achieved greater ER but lower rates of clinically relevant improvement in overhead motion compared to weak rTSAs. Level of evidence: III.

Biologics in rotator cuff repair

Rotator cuff tears are common in middle-aged and elderly patients. Despite advances in the surgical repair of rotator cuff tears, the rates of recurrent tear remain high. This may be due to the complexity of the tendons of the rotator cuff, which contributes to an inherently hostile healing environment. During the past 20 years, there has been an increased interest in the use of biologics to complement the healing environment in the shoulder, in order to improve rotator cuff healing and reduce the rate of recurrent tears. The aim of this review is to provide a summary of the current evidence for the use of forms of biological augmentation when repairing rotator cuff tears.

Elevated Body Mass Index Is Associated With Rotator Cuff Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Purpose

To analyze the literature regarding obesity, body mass index (BMI), and rotator cuff disease (RCD).

Methods

In this Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, we queried PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health, and Science Direct using key words (August 25, 2023). Analytic observational studies (cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies) with more than 30 participants per comparison group, evaluating the association between obesity and rotator cuff pathology, were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis was performed to quantitatively summarize associations between BMI and RCD to report odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for regression-based models and BMI mean differences between cases and controls. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions tool was used to evaluate risk of bias across all studies in the systematic review.

Results

After full-text review of 248 articles, 27 presented data on obesity and RCD, and 17 qualified for meta-analysis. Individuals with RCD were 1.21 times (95% CI 1.10-1.34) as likely to have overweight and 1.44 times (95% CI 1.32-1.59) as likely to have obesity compared with those without RCD. Each 5-unit increase in BMI was associated with 35% greater odds of having rotator cuff tear (95% CI 1.06-1.71). In-depth assessment for risk of bias shows quality of studies varies greatly and highlights outcome heterogeneity, lack of temporality, confounding and selection bias as major concerns for individual studies.

Conclusions

In this study, we found a positive association between elevated BMI and RCD.

Level of Evidence

Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis of Level II-III studies.

Characteristics of Traumatic Versus Atraumatic Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Under 50 Years of Age

BACKGROUND

 The prevalence of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) is known to be lower in younger patients compared to older patients. Recent studies in patients less than 50 years of age who sustain an RCT have focused on etiology, pathogenesis, and clinical outcomes following treatment. There are fewer studies that have focused on the demographics and clinical characteristics that may predispose this patient population to develop a tear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the difference in risk factors for degenerative tears compared to traumatic tears in patients under 50 years of age.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study utilized an internal registry of patients who had RCT injuries identified by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code M75.1x and confirmed by MRI between 2018 and 2023. Patients 50 years of age or younger were included and then classified into traumatic versus atraumatic RCT etiology groups. Demographics, tear characteristics, and clinical comorbidities were compared between the cohorts. Statistical analyses included a two-sided student's t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 177 patients under 50 years of age were identified. There was a higher prevalence of traumatic tears (59.9% vs. 40.1%; p = 0.008), the majority of whom identified as male (75.5% vs. 49.3%, p<0.001) when compared to the atraumatic cohort. Full-thickness tears were more likely to be traumatic (p = 0.04) and seen in patients insured by workers' compensation (p = 0.05). There was no significant difference in the age or preoperative comorbidities between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals a higher incidence of traumatic RCTs in a younger patient group. Sex, severity of tear, and workers' compensation were found to differ between traumatic and atraumatic cohorts. Further research is required to understand the interplay of these factors in younger patients' tear risk.

Obesity is associated with muscle atrophy in rotator cuff tear

Objective

The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the relationship between Body Mass Index (BMI) and muscle atrophy in individuals with rotator cuff tears.

Methods

This study consists of patients with rotator cuff tears identified by MRI from two independent cohorts, the Rotator Cuff Outcomes Workgroup (ROW) and the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON). Presence of atrophy (yes/no) and severity of atrophy (as an ordinal variable) were assessed on MRI by expert physicians. We used multivariable regression models to evaluate the relationship between BMI and muscle atrophy while adjusting for age and sex in each study, conducted sensitivity analyses for full-thickness tear and combined results using inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 539 patients (MOON=395, ROW=144) from the combined cohorts had MRI data available on muscle atrophy. Among these patients, 246 (46%) had atrophy of at least one of the muscles of the rotator cuff and 282 (52%) had full-thickness tears. In meta-analysis across both cohorts, each 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI was associated with a 21% (aOR=1.21, 95% CI=1.02, 1.43) increased odds of having muscle atrophy among individuals with any tear size, and 36% (aOR=1.36, 95% CI=1.01-1.81) increased odds among individuals with full-thickness tear.

Conclusions

Higher BMI was associated with significantly higher odds of muscle atrophy in patiens with rotator cuff tears. More study is needed to unders1tand why and how this relationship exists, as well as whether interventions to reduce BMI may help improve outcomes for these patients.

Level of Evidence

III.

Readability Analysis of Patient Education Material on Rotator Cuff Injuries From the Top 25 Ranking Orthopaedic Institutions

INTRODUCTION

Rotator cuff injuries (RCIs) are incredibly common in the US adult population. Forty-three percent of adults have basic or below-basic literacy levels; nonetheless, patient educational materials (PEMs) are frequently composed at levels exceeding these reading capabilities. This study investigates the readability of PEMs on RCIs published by leading US orthopaedic institutions.

METHODS

The top 25 orthopaedic institutions on the 2022 U.S. News & World Report Best Hospitals Specialty Ranking were selected. Readability scores of PEMs related to RCI were calculated using the www.readabilityformulas.com website.

RESULTS

Among the 25 analyzed PEM texts, all exceeded the sixth-grade reading level. Only four of 168 scores (2.4%) were below the eighth-grade level.

DISCUSSION

This study indicates that PEMs on rotator cuff injuries from top orthopedic institutions are too complex for many Americans, with readability levels ranging from 8.5 to 16th grade, well above the CDC-recommended eighth-grade level. The research highlights a widespread issue with high reading levels across healthcare information and underscores the need for healthcare providers to adopt patient-centered communication strategies to improve comprehension and accessibility.

CONCLUSION

PEMs on rotator cuff injuries from leading orthopedic institutions often have a reading level beyond that of many Americans, exceeding guidelines from the NIH and CDC that recommend PEMs be written at an eighth-grade reading level. To increase accessibility, enhance healthcare literacy, and improve patient outcomes, institutions should simplify these materials to meet recommended readability standards.

Shoulder pathologies in CrossFit: a magnetic resonance imaging study of 51 cases

BACKGROUND

Recent scientific work shows that the most common injuries in CrossFit© occur in the shoulder joint. This paper aims to provide a review of shoulder pathologies in a young CrossFit© cohort via MRI and clinical examination.

METHODS

A survey was conducted in 13 CrossFit "boxes" in Germany, in which athletes with recurrent shoulder pain could report for a clinical examination and MRI diagnostic. Fifty-one CrossFit athletes with chronic shoulder pain agreed to participate in the study and were then examined physically and by MRI.

RESULTS

Fifty-one active CrossFit athletes aged 21-45 years (mean 33.7 years, 35 male and 16 female) were recruited. The most frequently detected pathologies were partial lesions of the supraspinatus tendon (N.=25; 49%) and labral lesions (N.=11; 21.6%). The findings also identified partial lesions of the subscapularis tendon (N.=9; 17.6%), pulley lesions (N.=9; 17.6%), and partial lesions of the infraspinatus muscle (N.=2; 3.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate the need for a specific focus on particular shoulder injuries in CrossFit. Knowledge about the type of shoulder pathologies caused by CrossFit training allows for training-specific adaptations with regard to prevention, as well as a more targeted, sport-specific therapy. This study is the first in the literature to present on structural changes in the shoulders of active CrossFit athletes.

Comparison of Pain Scores and Functional Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Hip Labral Repair and Concomitant Capsular Repair or Plication Versus No Closure

Background

The need for capsular closure during arthroscopic hip labral repair is debated.

Purpose

To compare pain and functional outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic hip labral repair with concomitant repair or plication of the capsule versus no closure.

Study Design

Cohort study.

Methods

Outcomes were compared between patients undergoing arthroscopic hip labral repair with concomitant repair or plication of the capsule versus no closure at up to 2 years postoperatively and with stratification by age and sex. Patients with lateral center-edge angle <20°, a history of instability, a history of prior arthroscopic surgery in the ipsilateral hip, or a history of labral debridement only were excluded. Subanalysis was performed between patients undergoing no capsular closure who were propensity score matched 1:1 with patients undergoing repair or plication based on age, sex, and preoperative Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS). We compared patients who underwent T-capsulotomy with concomitant capsular closure matched 1:5 with patients who underwent an interportal capsulotomy with concomitant capsular repair based on age, sex, and preoperative MHHS.

Results

Patients undergoing capsular closure (n = 1069), compared with the no-closure group (n = 230), were more often female (68.6% vs 53.0%, respectively; P < .001), were younger (36.4 ± 13.3 vs 47.9 ± 14.7 years; P < .001), and had superior MHHS scores at 2 years postoperatively (85.8 ± 14.5 vs 81.8 ± 18.4, respectively; P = .020). In the matched analysis, no difference was found in outcome measures between patients in the capsular closure group (n = 215) and the no-closure group (n = 215) at any follow-up timepoint. No significant difference was seen between the 2 closure techniques at any follow-up timepoint. Patients with closure of the capsule achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for the 1-year MHHS at a similar rate as those without closure (MCID, 50.3% vs 44.9%, P = .288; PASS, 56.8% vs 51.1%, P = .287, respectively). Patients with T-capsulotomy achieved the MCID and the PASS for the 1-year MHHS at a similar rate compared with those with interportal capsulotomy (MCID, 50.1% vs 44.9%, P = .531; PASS, 65.7% vs 61.2%, P = .518, respectively).

Conclusion

When sex, age, and preoperative MHHS were controlled, capsular closure and no capsular closure after arthroscopic hip labral repair were associated with similar pain and functional outcomes for patients up to 2 years postoperatively.

Clinical outcomes of anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis with preoperative external rotation weakness and an intact rotator cuff: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Anatomic (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) are well-established treatments for patients with primary osteoarthritis and an intact cuff. However, it is unclear whether aTSA or rTSA provides superior outcomes in patients with preoperative external rotation (ER) weakness.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database was performed between 2007 and 2020. Patients were excluded for preoperative diagnoses of nerve injury, infection, tumor, or fracture. The analysis included 333 aTSAs and 155 rTSAs performed for primary cuff-intact osteoarthritis with 2-year minimum follow-up. Defining preoperative ER weakness as strength <3.3 kilograms (7.2 pounds), 3 cohorts were created and matched: (1) weak aTSAs (n = 74) vs. normal aTSAs (n = 74), (2) weak rTSAs (n = 38) vs. normal rTSAs (n = 38), and (3) weak rTSAs (n = 60) vs. weak aTSAs (n = 60). We compared range of motion, outcome scores, strength, complications, and revision rates at the latest follow-up.

RESULTS

Despite weak aTSAs having poorer preoperative strength in forward elevation and ER (P < .001), neither of these deficits persisted postoperatively compared with the normal cohort. Likewise, weak rTSAs had poorer preoperative strength in forward elevation and ER, overhead motion, and Constant, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and University of California, Los Angeles scores (P < .029). However, no statistically significant differences were found between preoperatively weak and normal rTSAs. When comparing weak aTSA vs. weak rTSA, no differences were found in preoperative and postoperative outcomes, proportion of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit, and complication and rate of revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In preoperatively weak patients with cuff-intact primary osteoarthritis, aTSA leads to similar postoperative strength, range of motion, and outcome scores compared with patients with normal preoperative strength, indicating that preoperative weakness does not preclude aTSA use. Furthermore, patients who were preoperatively weak in ER demonstrated improved postoperative rotational motion after undergoing aTSA and rTSA, with both groups achieving the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at similar rates.

Does achieving clinically important thresholds after first shoulder arthroplasty predict similar outcomes of the contralateral shoulder?

BACKGROUND

Patients are increasingly undergoing bilateral total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). At present, it is unknown whether success after the first TSA is predictive of success after contralateral TSA. We aimed to determine whether exceeding clinically important thresholds of success after primary TSA predicts similar outcomes for subsequent contralateral TSA.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database for patients undergoing bilateral primary anatomic (aTSA) or reverse (rTSA) total shoulder arthroplasty since January 2000 with preoperative and 2- or 3-year clinical follow-up. Our primary outcome was whether exceeding clinically important thresholds in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score for the first TSA was predictive of similar success of the contralateral TSA; thresholds for the ASES score were adopted from prior literature and included the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), the substantial clinical benefit (SCB), 30% of maximal possible improvement (MPI), and the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS). The PASS is defined as the highest level of symptom beyond which patients consider themselves well, which may be a better indicator of a patient's quality of life. To determine whether exceeding clinically important thresholds was independently predictive of similar success after second contralateral TSA, we performed multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age at second surgery, sex, BMI, and type of first and second TSA.

RESULTS

Of the 134 patients identified that underwent bilateral shoulder arthroplasty, 65 (49%) had bilateral rTSAs, 45 (34%) had bilateral aTSAs, 21 (16%) underwent aTSA/rTSA, and 3 (2%) underwent rTSA/aTSA. On multivariable logistic regression, exceeding clinically important thresholds after first TSA was not associated with greater odds of achieving thresholds after second TSA when success was evaluated by the MCID, SCB, and 30% MPI. In contrast, exceeding the PASS after first TSA was associated with 5.9 times greater odds (95% confidence interval 2.5-14.4, P < .001) of exceeding the PASS after second TSA. Overall, patients who exceeded the PASS after first TSA exceeded the PASS after second TSA at a higher rate (71% vs. 29%, P < .001); this difference persisted when stratified by type of prosthesis for first and second TSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who achieve the ASES score PASS after first TSA have greater odds of achieving the PASS for the contralateral shoulder regardless of prostheses type.

Pain scores and functional outcomes of patients with shoulder labral repair using all-suture anchors versus conventional anchors

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare PROMs in patients undergoing anterior glenoid labral repair using all-suture versus conventional anchors. We hypothesized PROMs would be similar between groups.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of the Arthrex Global Surgical Outcomes System (SOS) database, querying patients who underwent arthroscopic glenoid labral repair between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2020. Patients aged 18-100, who had isolated glenoid labrum repair with at least 12-month follow-up were included. The visual analog pain scale (VAS), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, Veteran's RAND 12-items health survey, single assessment numeric evaluation and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES) were compared preoperatively, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively in patients who received all-suture anchors versus conventional anchors in the setting of anterior glenoid labrum repair. Our primary aim was comparison of PROMs between patients receiving all-suture versus conventional suture anchors. Secondarily, a sub-analysis was performed comparing outcomes based on anchor utilization for patients with noted anterior instability.

RESULTS

We evaluated 566 patients, 54 patients receiving all-suture anchors and 512 patients receiving conventional anchors. At two-year follow-up there was no significant difference between the two groups in PROMs. In a sub-analysis of isolated anterior labrum repair, there was an improvement in ASES (P = 0.034) and VAS (P = 0.039) with the all-suture anchor at two-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

All-suture anchors provide similar or superior pain and functional outcome scores up to 2 years postoperatively compared to conventional anchors.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

As all-suture anchors gain popularity among surgeons, this is the largest scale study to date validating their use in the setting of glenoid labrum repair. Institutional Review Board (IRB): IRB202102550.

Predictors of pain development for contralateral asymptomatic degenerative rotator cuff tears based on features of an ipsilateral painful cuff tear: a prospective longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND

Prior rotator cuff disease natural history studies have focused on tear-related factors that predict disease progression within a given shoulder. The purpose of this study was to examine both patient- and tear-related characteristics of a painful rotator cuff tear that predict future pain development and functional impairment in a shoulder with a contralateral asymptomatic cuff tear.

METHODS

This was a prospective longitudinal cohort study of patients aged ≤65 years who underwent surgery for a painful degenerative rotator cuff tear and possessed an asymptomatic contralateral tear. Patients were followed up prospectively by shoulder ultrasound, physical examination, and functional score assessment. The primary outcome was change in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score at 2 years. Secondary outcomes included the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) depression and anxiety scores, and Veterans RAND-12 (VR-12) mental component score (MCS).

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were included, with a mean follow-up period of 37 months (range, 24-42 months). In 17 patients (26%), contralateral shoulder pain developed at a median of 15.2 months (interquartile range [IQR], 10.5 months). No difference in age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, or occupational demand was noted between patients in whom pain developed and those in whom pain did not develop. In the presenting painful shoulder, there was no difference in baseline tear size, muscle degeneration, or biceps pathology between groups. The mean baseline tear length (8.6 mm vs. 3.8 mm, P = .0008) and width (8.4 mm vs. 3.2 mm, P = .0004) were larger in asymptomatic shoulders in which pain subsequently developed compared with those in which pain did not develop. However, there was no difference in mean tear enlargement (P = .51 for length and P = .90 for width). There were no differences in baseline ASES, WORC, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), or HADS depression and anxiety scores between shoulders in which pain developed and those in which pain did not develop; however, patients in whom pain developed reported a lower baseline VR-12 MCS (53.3 vs. 57.6, P = .04). Shoulders in which pain developed had higher visual analog scale pain scores (2.9 [standard deviation (SD), 2.5] vs. 0.6 [SD, 1.0]; P = .016), lower ASES scores 75 [SD, 33] vs. 100 [SD, 11.6]; P = .001), and significant changes in all WORC scales with pain onset compared with those that remained asymptomatic. The study showed no significant difference in changes in the HADS anxiety and depression scores but found a significant increase in the VR-12 MCS in patients in whom pain developed (7.1 [interquartile range, 12.6] vs. -1.9 [interquartile range, 8.7]; P = .036).

CONCLUSION

In one-quarter of patients with painful cuff tears, pain developed in a contralateral asymptomatic cuff tear that resulted in a measurable decline in function within 3 years. Our analysis showed that only the baseline tear size of the asymptomatic shoulder was predictive of pain development. There were no tear-related features of the presenting painful rotator cuff tear or indices of mental health and physical function or occupational demand that were predictive of future pain development at short-term follow-up.

Risk factors for symptomatic rotator cuff tears: a retrospective case-control study

BACKGROUND

The incidence and diagnostic rate of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) have increased significantly. The purpose of this study was to investigate and analyze the risk factors for symptomatic RCTs to provide a basis for their prevention and treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the relevant clinical indicators of 193 randomized clinical trial (RCT) patients and 161 non-RCT patients hospitalized with shoulder pain as the main complaint from January 1, 2017, to August 31, 2021. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the differences in potential risk factors between the two groups.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed that age (p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.036), hypertension (p < 0.001), coronary heart disease (p = 0.028), history of shoulder trauma (p < 0.001), hyperlipidemia (p = 0.025), type III acromion (p = 0.012) and critical shoulder angle (CSA) (p < 0.001) increased the risk of RCTs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age ≥ 60 years (OR = 2.61, 95% CI = 1.23 to 5.12), CSA ≥ 35° (OR = 4.24, 95% CI = 1.60 to 11.22), hypertension (OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.33 to 4.11) and history of shoulder trauma (OR = 5.20, 95% CI = 2.87 to 9.45) were independent risk factors for symptomatic RCTs.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed that age ≥ 60 years, CSA ≥35°, hypertension and history of shoulder trauma are independent risk factors for symptomatic RCTs and can provide directions for further development of prevention and treatment strategies. Future studies need to clarify the mechanism underlying the association between these risk factors and symptomatic RCTs.

Clinical outcomes of anatomical versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis, an intact rotator cuff, and limited forward elevation

Aims

Both anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA and rTSA) provide functional improvements. A reported benefit of aTSA is better range of motion (ROM). However, it is not clear which procedure provides better outcomes in patients with limited foward elevation (FE). The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of aTSA and rTSA in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), an intact rotator cuff, and limited FE.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of a single institution's prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database for TSAs undertaken between 2007 and 2020. A total of 344 aTSAs and 163 rTSAs, which were performed in patients with OA and an intact rotator cuff with a minimum follow-up of two years, were included. Using the definition of preoperative stiffness as passive FE ≤ 105°, three cohorts were matched 1:1 by age, sex, and follow-up: stiff aTSAs (85) to non-stiff aTSAs (85); stiff rTSAs (74) to non-stiff rTSAs (74); and stiff rTSAs (64) to stiff aTSAs (64). We the compared ROMs, outcome scores, and complication and revision rates.

Results

Compared with non-stiff aTSAs, stiff aTSAs had poorer passive FE and active external rotation (ER), whereas there were no significant postoperative differences between stiff rTSAs and non-stiff rTSAs. There were no significant differences in preoperative function when comparing stiff aTSAs with stiff rTSAs. However, stiff rTSAs had significantly greater postoperative active and passive FE (p = 0.001 and 0.004, respectively), and active abduction (p = 0.001) compared with stiff aTSAs. The outcome scores were significantly more favourable in stiff rTSAs for the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California, Los Angeles score, and the Constant score, compared with stiff aTSAs. When comparing the proportion of stiff aTSAs versus stiff rTSAs that exceeded the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit, stiff rTSAs achieved both at greater rates for all measurements except active ER. The complication rate did not significantly differ between stiff aTSAs and stiff rTSAs, but there was a significantly higher rate of revision surgery in stiff aTSAs (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

Postoperative overhead ROM, outcome scores, and rates of revision surgery favour the use of a rTSA rather than aTSA in patients with glenohumeral OA, an intact rotator cuff and limited FE, with similar rotational ROM in these two groups.

Abnormal Laboratory Values for Metabolic and Hormonal Syndromes Are Prevalent Among Patients Undergoing Rotator Cuff Repair

Purpose

To determine the prevalence of systemic laboratory abnormalities among patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (RCR).

Methods

Patients who underwent RCR at the authors' institution for 1 year between October 2021 to September 2022 were retrospectively identified. Preoperative laboratory values, including serum sex hormones, vitamin D, hemoglobin A1C, and a lipid panel, were obtained as part of our routine practice during the study period. Demographics and tear characteristics were compared in patients with laboratory data and those without. For included patients with laboratory data, mean laboratory values and percentage of patients with abnormal laboratory values were recorded.

Results

During a 1-year period of time, 135 RCRs were performed, of which preoperative labs were obtained on 105. Of these, 67% were sex hormone deficient, 36% were vitamin D deficient, 45% had an abnormal hemoglobin A1C, and 64% had an abnormal lipid panel. In total 4% had "normal" labs.

Conclusions

In this retrospective study, sex hormone deficiency is highly prevalent among patients undergoing RCR. Nearly all patients undergoing RCR have systemic laboratory abnormalities involving either sex hormone deficiency, vitamin D deficiency, dyslipidemia, and/or prediabetes.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, prognostic case series.

Social determinants of health influence clinical outcomes of patients undergoing rotator cuff repair: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are the collection of environmental, institutional, and intrinsic conditions that may bias access to, and utilization of, health care across an individual's lifetime. The effects of SDOH are associated with disparities in patient-reported outcomes after hip and knee arthroplasty, but its impact on rotator cuff repair (RCR) is poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the influences that SDOH have on accessing appropriate orthopedic treatment, as well as its effects on patient-reported outcomes following RCR.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and guidelines outlined by the Cochrane Collaboration. A search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception until March 2022 was conducted to identify studies reporting at least 1 SDOH and its effect on access to health care, clinical outcomes, or patient-reported outcomes following RCR. The search term was created with reference to the PROGRESS-Plus framework. Methodological quality of included primary studies was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for nonrandomized studies, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized studies.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies (level I-IV evidence) from 18 journals across 7 countries, published between 1999 and 2022, met inclusion criteria, including 102,372 patients, 669 physical therapy (PT) clinics, and 71 orthopedic surgery practices. Multivariate analysis revealed female gender, labor-intensive occupation and worker's compensation claims, comorbidities, tobacco use, federally subsidized insurance, lower education level, racial or ethnic minority status, low-income place of residence and low-volume surgery regions, unemployment, and preoperative narcotic use contribute to delays in access to health care and/or more severe disease state on presentation. Black race patients were found to have significantly worse postoperative clinical and patient-reported outcomes and experienced more pain following RCR. Furthermore, Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to present to low-volume surgeons and low-volume facilities. A lower education level was shown to be an independent predictor of poor surgical and patient-reported outcomes as well as increased pain and worse patient satisfaction. Patients with federally subsidized insurance demonstrated significantly worse postoperative clinical and patient-reported outcomes CONCLUSIONS: The impediments created by SDOH lead to worse clinical and patient-reported outcomes following RCR including increased risk of postoperative complications, failed repair, higher rates of revision surgery, and decreased ability to return to work. Orthopedic surgeons, policy makers, and insurers should be aware of the aforementioned SDOH as markers for characteristics that may predispose to inferior outcomes following RCR.

Tenotomy-induced muscle atrophy is sex-specific and independent of NFκB

The nuclear factor-κB (NFκB) pathway is a major thoroughfare for skeletal muscle atrophy and is driven by diverse stimuli. Targeted inhibition of NFκB through its canonical mediator IKKβ effectively mitigates loss of muscle mass across many conditions, from denervation to unloading to cancer. In this study, we used gain- and loss-of-function mouse models to examine the role of NFκB in muscle atrophy following rotator cuff tenotomy - a model of chronic rotator cuff tear. IKKβ was knocked down or constitutively activated in muscle-specific inducible transgenic mice to elicit a twofold gain or loss of NFκB signaling. Surprisingly, neither knockdown of IKKβ nor overexpression of caIKKβ significantly altered the loss of muscle mass following tenotomy. This finding was consistent across measures of morphological adaptation (fiber cross-sectional area, fiber length, fiber number), tissue pathology (fibrosis and fatty infiltration), and intracellular signaling (ubiquitin-proteasome, autophagy). Intriguingly, late-stage tenotomy-induced atrophy was exacerbated in male mice compared with female mice. This sex specificity was driven by ongoing decreases in fiber cross-sectional area, which paralleled the accumulation of large autophagic vesicles in male, but not female muscle. These findings suggest that tenotomy-induced atrophy is not dependent on NFκB and instead may be regulated by autophagy in a sex-specific manner.