Cemented vs. uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Prosthetic treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly

The Section for Skeletal Trauma and Sports Injuries of the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) has reached a consensus among European countries in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures in a working group. As a result the ESTES recommendations on proximal humerus fractures in the elderly were published in 2021. The various treatment options and algorithms for this are now described in more detail and the procedures were explained in several related specialist articles. The recommendations include conservative and four possible surgical treatment options (ORIF, nailing, hemi- and total inverse arthroplasty). This article deals with hemi- and total inverse arthroplasty. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has emerged as a key treatment for complex proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. It offers significant advantages in restoring function, alleviating pain, and providing durable outcomes compared to alternative approaches. Despite challenges related to implant complications and surgical expertise, ongoing advancements in technology and techniques continue to improve its effectiveness. With the rising incidence of complex fractures, RTSA is expected to play an increasingly vital role in maintaining the quality of life in aging populations.

Uncemented versus cemented humeral fixation during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture

Introduction

Over time, the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) treating proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) and fracture sequelae has grown significantly due to its demonstrated effectiveness over open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and hemiarthroplasty (HA). Cemented humeral stems have been widely utilized in RTSA for PHF, however cementless alternatives have become increasingly popular. This study seeks to analyze outcomes and complications in patients undergoing RTSA for fracture with uncemented and cemented stems at mid-term follow-up.

Methods

Patient records were queried for all patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for fracture with between January 7, 2009 and January 10, 2019 and completed a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Demographics characteristics, post-operative functional measurements, complications, and radiographs were assessed. A 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed.

Results

A total of 23 patients encompassing 11 cemented and 12 uncemented stems met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the uncemented cohort was 70.0 ± 9.8 years with a mean follow-up of 2.6 ± 1.3 years while the mean age of the cemented cohort was 68.9 ± 9.2 years with a mean follow-up of 2.9 ± 1.1 years. No differences in strength, range of motion, or survival between groups were observed. Two patients in the cemented cohort demonstrated humeral component loosening on follow-up radiographs.

Discussion

Uncemented and cemented humeral fixation during RTSA for proximal humerus fracture leads to similar outcomes, and thus both are safe and effective methods of achieving humeral fixation in fracture patients.

[Proximal humerus fracture: old and new, established and doubtful, conservative and operative aspects]

Proximal humeral fractures are not only frequent injuries but also serve as an important indicator for a possibly underlying osteoporosis. Therefore, in addition to fracture management, timely diagnostics and treatment of the osteoporosis should also be prioritized. The decision between a conservative and surgical treatment approach requires a differentiated consideration of the fracture morphology, individual patient characteristics and functional expectations. Conservative treatment can be an adequate alternative in specific cases, particularly in geriatric patients with low functional demands; however, the standardization of this treatment approach remains challenging. Surgical interventions have proven effective, especially for complex fractures, with reverse shoulder arthroplasty emerging as a reliable option. Various augmentation and fixation techniques, such as the combination of locking plates with fibular grafts or double plating osteosynthesis, demonstrate biomechanical advantages and can improve the primary stability. Innovative technologies, including 3D planning, intraoperative navigation and robotics, offer new possibilities for optimizing implant placement and can contribute to improvement of long-term clinical outcomes. Economic analyses suggest that reverse arthroplasty can provide not only clinical benefits in selected cases but can also be cost-effective; however, further evaluation of the long-term impact on the healthcare system is required.

Lower revision rate of cemented humeral stem reverse total shoulder arthroplasty compared to cementless humeral stem in proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of cemented versus cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures (PHFs), with a focus on revision rates, tuberosity union, scapular notching, range of motion, and functional scores.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, incorporating data from studies comparing cemented and cementless rTSA for PHFs. Key outcomes analyzed included revision rates, tuberosity union rates, scapular notching, range of motion, and functional scores.

RESULTS

The analysis included data from seven studies, encompassing a total of 6,692 cases. Cementless rTSA demonstrated a statistically significant higher overall revision rate compared to cemented rTSA, with revision rates of 5.5% and 4.1%, respectively. Tuberosity union rates were 62.4% for the cemented group and 69.3% for the cementless group. Scapular notching was observed in 12.8% of the cemented group and 7.5% of the cementless group, although this difference was not statistically significant. Importantly, clinical outcomes such as Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores and range of motion showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Cementless rTSA has a statistically significantly higher overall revision rate compared to cemented rTSA. Despite this, both fixation methods provide similar clinical outcomes for PHFs, including tuberosity union, scapular notching, range of motion, and functional scores.

Cemented vs. cementless stems for reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: a registry analysis with patient-reported outcomes from a level 1 trauma centre

Background

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is being increasingly used in the treatment of comminuted or unreconstructible proximal humerus fractures. It is currently unclear if cementless rTSA have equivocal revision rates, mortality, and functional outcomes compared to cemented or cementless rTSA.

Methods

Two data sources were used for this study. All rTSA performed for proximal humerus fractures between 1 January 2010 and 1 January 2020 recorded on the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry were used to determine revision rate and mortality between cemented and cementless rTSA. Patient-reported outcome measurements, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Oxford Shoulder Score, and single assessment numerical value were obtained via telephone from Royal Perth Hospital (RPH) patients between 01 January 2010 and 10 February 2021.

Results

The study included 83 patients who underwent rTSA for proximal humerus fractures at RPH. There were 4335 rTSA procedures identified at other hospitals nationally. Of these, 54% of rTSA used cementless humeral stems. There was no significant difference in revision rate or mortality between cemented and cementless humeral stems adjusted for age and gender. For the RPH cohort, patient-reported outcome measurements scores included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score of 65.9 (CI: 60.6-71.2), Oxford Shoulder Score of 34.6 (CI: 31.9-37.2), and single assessment numerical value of 68.8 (CI: 61.8-75.8).

Conclusion

Revision rates and mortality are similar between cemented and cementless humeral stems used for rTSA for proximal humerus fractures. For appropriate patients, cementless humeral stems may be an acceptable first-line treatment for proximal humerus fractures.

Whether the Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Should Continue to Be Expanded? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

It is still unclear whether reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has advantages over traditional hemiarthroplasty (HA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) in the treatment of complex shoulder joint diseases. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of RTSA in the treatment of complex shoulder joint diseases and further determine whether it is necessary to expand the indications of RTSA.

METHOD

We conducted a systematic search of studies published between January 1, 2012 and May 31, 2023 in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The experimental group included patients who underwent primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), while the control group consisted of patients who underwent primary hemiarthroplasty (HA) or anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA). The minimum follow-up period was 1 year, and a random-effects model was utilized for data synthesis.

RESULTS

A total of 45 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compare to HA, RTSA showed significant advantages in postoperative ASES scores (p = 0.004), forward flexion (p < 0.0001), and abduction (p < 0.0001). Compare to ATSA, RTSA showed significantly lower postoperative Constant scores (p = 0.004), ASES scores (p = 0.001), SST scores (p < 0.0001), forward flexion (p < 0.0001), abduction (p = 0.011), internal rotation (p < 0.0001), and external rotation (p < 0.0001). Further meta regression analysis was conducted, considering factors such as region, age, gender ratio, and follow-up time, excluding the influence of relevant factors. Overall, RTSA did not demonstrate advantages in postoperative functional scores and range of motion. In terms of complication and revision rates, RTSA had lower rates compared to HA and ATSA, except for the complication rate, where there was no significant difference between RTSA and ATSA (p = 0.521), but statistically significant differences were observed in other measures.

CONCLUSION

RTSA demonstrates better clinical efficacy compared to HA but is inferior to ATSA. It can be considered for expanding treatment options for elderly patients with 3 or 4-part proximal humeral fractures, but it is not suitable for treating end-stage shoulder arthritis and humeral head necrosis. Overall, the decision to use RTSA should be carefully evaluated based on the extent of the patient's rotator cuff injury.

Medialized vs. Lateralized Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is increasingly used in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with reliable clinical improvement. Lateralized RSA implants have conferred superior outcomes compared with the original Grammont design in patients with nontraumatic indications. However, in the setting of a PHF, lateralized components can place increased tension across the tuberosity fracture site and potentially compromise tuberosity healing and outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to determine the effect of implant design on clinical outcomes after RSA for PHFs.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried for clinical studies on RSA performed for PHFs that reported implant manufacturer details. Our primary outcomes included postoperative external rotation (ER), forward elevation (FE), abduction, Constant score, rate of greater tuberosity (GT) healing, and the incidence of complications compared between medialized vs. lateralized global implant design.

RESULTS

Globally lateralized RSA cohorts (478 RSAs total with cumulative lateral offset achieved through humeral or glenoid lateralization or both humeral and glenoid lateralization) were found to have a greater mean postoperative Constant score compared with globally medialized (medialized glenoid and medialized humerus) RSA cohorts with 1,494 total medialized RSAs (66 vs. 59, p = 0.006), but there was no significant difference regarding mean postoperative ER (30° vs. 22°, p = 0.078), FE (117° vs. 119°, p = 0.708), or abduction (103° vs. 107°, p = 0.377). On meta-regression, neither implant design nor tuberosity status significantly influenced postoperative ER, FE, abduction, or Constant score on meta-regression independent of mean follow-up and age at surgery. The rate of GT healing was greater in lateralized compared with medialized RSAs (88% vs. 72%, p < 0.001). On meta-regression, medialized RSA design was associated with a 73% lower odds of GT healing (odds ratio = 0.27, 95% confidence interval = 0.11-0.68, p = 0.007) independent of mean follow-up and age at surgery.

CONCLUSION

Lateralized RSA implants conferred no significant functional benefit over medialized implants when used in patients with PHFs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: is it a safe option for elderly patients with proximal humerus fractures?

PURPOSE

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a common surgical procedure for elderly patients with proximal humerus fractures. Cement fixation of the humeral stem is considered the gold standard for this procedure. Due to the high prevalence of osteoporosis in this patient population, the risk of intraoperative fractures is increased when uncemented stems are used. Stem loosening is another concern of uncemented stems. However, the use of cement is associated with the risk of cement embolisation, impairment of tuberosity healing, and technical difficulties for later revisions. This study aimed (i) to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients treated with uncemented RSA for proximal humerus fractures at two years postoperatively, and (ii) to compare these outcomes between patients with and without decreased low bone quality as measured by the deltoid tuberosity index.

METHODS

The single-centre prospective study included 54 shoulders (52 patients) with a proximal humerus fracture between 2019 and 2022. Enrolled were patients aged 65 and older with acute or secondary displaced three- or four-part fractures or head-split fractures treated with RSA using the same uncemented system and tubercula refixation. At 24 months post-surgery, clinical evaluations included range of motion (ROM), Constant-Murley Score (CS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score. Radiological assessments evaluated scapular notching, radiolucent lines, and greater tuberosity healing.

RESULTS

The mean age was 79 years (± 8), 87% were female, and 69% had osteoporotic fractures. At the two-year follow-up, the median SSV was 90% (IQR 80-95), the median CS Score was 76.5 (IQR 72-81), and the median ASES Score was 89.9 (IQR 82-93). The ROM measurements were: median active forward flexion 140° (IQR 120-160), median external rotation 30° (IQR 20-40), and median active internal rotation 6 (IQR 4-8). The greater tuberosity healing rate was 94.5%. Although osteoporotic fractures occurred more often in older patients (mean 81 vs. 72 years, respectively), no other significant differences were detected between the groups. One case of aseptic stem loosening occurred in the non-osteoporotic group.

CONCLUSION

Even in osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures, cementless stems combined with tubercula refixation resulted in favourable outcomes and were not associated with increased complications.

Influence of Humeral Component Cement and Bone Grafting on Greater Tuberosity Healing and Functional Outcomes After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is increasingly used in the treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with reliable clinical improvement. However, the preferred techniques for humeral stem fixation are varied and may be influenced by patient and injury characteristics, including bone quality and fracture pattern. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to determine the effect of humeral component cementing and bone grafting on tuberosity healing rates and functional outcomes after RSA for PHFs.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried for clinical studies on RSA performed for PHFs that reported on the use of cemented humeral stems and autograft bone. The primary outcome was the rate of greater tuberosity healing between the various techniques. Secondarily, the authors compared clinical outcomes including postoperative external rotation, forward elevation, abduction, Constant score, and the incidence of complications and revision surgery. Outcomes were compared based on the use of an uncemented press-fit stem, a fully cemented stem without bone graft, or a partially cemented stem with humeral head autograft (i.e., black and tan technique).

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies reporting on 1,797 RSAs were included (mean patient age, 75 years; follow-up, 34 months; 81% female). Tuberosity healing was highest in the uncemented cohort, then the black and tan cohort, and lowest in the cemented cohort (80% vs. 70% vs. 61%, p = 0.006). No significant differences in postoperative range of motion, Constant score, complication rates, or revision rates were found.

CONCLUSION

Uncemented fixation with a press-fit stem was associated with superior greater tuberosity healing rates; however, functional outcomes and complications did not differ among techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Greater Tuberosity Healing Rate and Clinical Results Following RSA Are Similar for Two Fracture-Specific Implant Systems

Background: Various fracture-specific reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) systems exist on the market. We set out to examine whether the type of prosthesis used and the means of fixation (cemented or non-cemented) influenced the rate of tuberosity healing or the functional outcome of the operation. Methods: This retrospective cohort multicenter study included 146 patients who underwent RSA for an acute three- or four-part proximal humerus fracture and had a minimum follow-up of one year. Six fellowship-trained surgeons at two different centers performed all operations. The implants were either Tornier Aequalis or Depuy Delta Xtend, both fracture-specific Grammont-style systems. Results: The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) was 76 ± 7 years, and 83% of patients were female. The mean ± SD follow-up time was 30 ± 31 months. The Aequalis prosthesis was used in 82 patients (56%), and the Delta Xtend in 64 patients (44%). A total of 105 RSAs (72%) were cemented. Tuberosity healing rate was similar for the two implant systems (71% Aequalis vs. 82% Delta Xtend, p = 0.15) and for the cemented or non-cemented, respectively (73% cemented vs. 83% non-cemented, p = 0.22). There was no significant difference in the motion and functional outcomes between the two implant systems in this study. Conclusions: RSA for complex PHF in the elderly has similar short-term results, regardless of the type of fracture-specific implant or the fixation technique (cemented vs. cementless).

Optimal combination of arthroplasty type, fixation method, and postoperative rehabilitation protocol for complex proximal humerus fractures in the elderly: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to define the optimal combination of surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation protocol for elderly patients undergoing either hemiarthroplasty (HA) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for acute proximal humerus fracture (PHF) by performing a network meta-analysis of the comparative studies in the literature.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was screened from 2007 to 2023. Inclusion criteria were level I-IV studies utilizing primary HA and/or rTSA published in a peer-reviewed journal, that specified whether humeral stems were cemented or noncemented, specified postoperative rehabilitation protocol, and reported results of HA and/or rTSA performed for PHF. Early range of motion (ROM) was defined as the initiation of active ROM at ≤3 weeks after surgery. Level of evidence was evaluated based on the criteria by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Clinical outcomes were compared using a frequentist approach to network meta-analysis with a random-effects model that was performed using the netmeta package version 0.9-6 in R.

RESULTS

A total of 28 studies (1119 patients) were included with an average age of 74 ± 3.7 and mean follow-up of 32 ± 11.1 months. In the early ROM cohort (Early), the mean time to active ROM was 2.4 ± 0.76 weeks compared to 5.9 ± 1.04 weeks in the delayed ROM cohort (Delayed). Overall, rTSA-Pressfit-Early resulted in statistically superior outcomes including postoperative forward elevation (126 ± 27.5), abduction (116 ± 30.6), internal rotation (5.27 ± 0.74, corresponding to L3-L1), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (71.8 ± 17), tuberosity union (89%), and lowest tuberosity nonunion rate (9.6%) in patients ≥65 year old with acute PHF undergoing shoulder arthroplasty (all P ≤ .05). In total there were 277 (14.5%) complications across the cohorts, of which 89/277 (34%) were in the HA-Cement-Delayed cohort. HA-Cement-Delayed resulted in 2-times higher odds of experiencing a complication when compared to rTSA-Cement-Delayed (P = .005). Conversely, rTSA-Cement-Early cohort followed by rTSA-Pressfit-Early resulted in a total complication rate of 4.7% and 5.4% (odds ratios, 0.30; P = .01 & odds ratios, 0.42; P = .05), respectively. The total rate of scapular notching was higher in the cemented rTSA subgroups (16.5%) vs. (8.91%) in the press fit rTSA subgroups (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that patients ≥65 years of age, who sustain a 3-or 4-part PHF achieve the most benefit in terms of ROM, postoperative functional outcomes, tuberosity union, and overall complication rate when undergoing rTSA with a noncemented stem and early postoperative ROM when compared to the mainstream preference-rTSA-Cement-Delayed.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Review of Current Evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to summarize information published in the recent peer-reviewed literature on reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for proximal humerus fractures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although there is still some debate regarding which may be the best treatment for proximal humerus fractures in certain age ranges, RSA seems to offer more predictable results than other surgical treatments for elderly patients. Successful tuberosity healing seems to correlate with better outcomes. Recent trends indicate interest in cementless fixation, fracture-specific stems and a 135-degree polyethylene opening angle. RSA provides a successful surgical solution for selected proximal humerus fractures. Indications, design features, and surgical execution have continued to evolve over the last few years.

Influence of design features and brand of reverse shoulder arthroplasties on survivorship and reasons for revision surgery: results of 5,494 arthroplasties with up to 15 years' follow-up reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 2007-2022

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We aimed to report the survival of different reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) designs and brands, and factors associated with revision. The secondary aim was to evaluate the reasons for revision.

METHODS

We included 4,696 inlay and 798 onlay RSAs reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR) 2007-2022. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship and Cox models adjusted for age, sex, diagnosis, implant design, humeral fixation, and previous surgery were investigated to assess revision risks. The reasons for revision were compared using competing risk analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, the 10-year survival rate was 94% (confidence interval [CI] 93-95). At 5 years all brands exceeded 90%. Compared with Delta Xtend (n = 3,865), Aequalis Ascend Flex (HR 2.8, CI 1.7-4.6), Aequalis Reversed II (HR 2.2, CI 1.2-4.2), SMR (HR 2.5, CI 1.3-4.7), and Promos (HR 2.2, CI 1.0-4.9) had increased risk of revision. Onlay and inlay RSAs had similar risk of revision (HR 1.2, CI 0.8-1.8). Instability and deep infection were the most frequent revision causes. Male sex (HR 2.3, CI 1.7-3.1), fracture sequelae (HR 3.1, CI 2.1-5.0), and fractures operated on with uncemented humeral stems had increased risk of revision (HR 3.5, CI 1.6-7.3).

CONCLUSION

We found similar risk of revision with inlay and onlay designs. Some prosthesis brands had a higher rate of revision than the most common implant, but numbers were low.

Cemented Versus Uncemented Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures: National Shoulder Arthroplasty Data from Türkiye

Background

This study evaluated national trends in cemented and uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for proximal humerus fractures using a comprehensive national surgical database. This study aimed to compare RSA used in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures with the literature and to determine the country's trend.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted using the health records of individuals aged ≥ 18 years who underwent RSA for proximal humerus fractures between 2016 and 2022. Patients were divided into cemented and uncemented groups, and demographic data (age, sex), duration of hospital stay, transfusions, revisions, mortality, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores were analyzed.

Results

A total of 618 cemented RSA and 1,364 uncemented RSA procedures were reviewed. Patients who underwent cemented RSA were significantly older than those who had uncemented RSA (p = 0.002). Transfusion rates were higher in the cemented RSA group (p = 0.006). The frequency of revision surgery was 6.1%. Younger age and male sex were associated with revision (p < 0.001). CCI scores were higher among transfused patients than non-transfused patients (p < 0.001). The incidence of cemented RSA was 11.7% and 49% in 2016 and 2022, respectively. Differences were found among hospital types and geographical regions.

Conclusions

While cemented RSA has been gaining attention and increased application in recent years for proximal humerus fractures, uncemented RSA still predominates. The choice between these 2 methods is largely influenced by regional and hospital-level factors. The type of RSA and high CCI scores were found to have no significant impact on the risk of surgical revision.

Comparison of Outcomes After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients With Proximal Humerus Fractures Versus Rotator Cuff Arthropathy

INTRODUCTION

Indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has expanded to encompass complex proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) in recent years. The purpose of this study was to report and assess whether PHF patients treated with rTSA could achieve similar functional outcomes and short-term survivorship to patients who underwent rTSA for rotator cuff arthropathy (RTCA).

METHODS

All consecutive patients with a preoperative diagnosis of PHF or RTCA, 18 years or older, treated with rTSA at a single academic institution between 2018 and 2020 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes were survivorship defined as revision surgery or implant failure analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve, and functional outcomes, which included Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, and range of motion (ROM) were compared at multiple follow-up time points up to 2 years. Secondary outcomes were patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical data, length of hospital stay, and discharge disposition.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients were included: 21 patients (44%) were diagnosed with PHF and 27 patients (56%) had RTCA. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate estimates at 3 years were 90.5% in the PHF group and 85.2% in the RTCA group. No differences in revision surgery rates between the two groups (P = 0.68) or survivorship (P = 0.63) were found. ROM was significantly lower at subsequent follow-up time points in multiple planes (P < 0.05). A greater proportion of patients in the PHF group received cement for humeral implant fixation compared with the RTCA group (48% versus 7%, P = 0.002). The mean length of hospital stay was longer in PHF patients compared with RTCA patients (2.9 ± 3.8 days versus 1.6 ± 1.8 days, P = 0.13), and a significantly lower proportion of PHF patients were discharged home (67% versus 96%, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

The rTSA implant survivorship at 3 years for both PHF and RTCA patients show comparable results. At the 2-year follow-up, RTCA patients treated with rTSA were found to have better ROM compared with PHF patients.

Fracture Dislocations of the Glenohumeral Joint

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Proximal humerus fracture dislocations typically result from high-energy mechanisms and carry specific risks, technical challenges, and management considerations. It is vital for treating surgeons to understand the various indications, procedures, and complications involved with their treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

While these injuries are relatively rare in comparison with other categories of proximal humerus fractures, fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus require treating surgeons to consider patient age, activity level, injury pattern, and occasionally intra-operative findings to select the ideal treatment strategy for each injury. Proximal humerus fracture dislocations are complex injuries that require special considerations. This review summarizes recent literature regarding the evaluation and management of these injuries as well as the indications and surgical techniques for each treatment strategy. Thorough pre-operative patient evaluation and shared decision-making should be employed in all cases. While nonoperative management is uncommonly considered, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty, and reverse total shoulder replacement are at the surgeon's disposal, each with their own indications and complication profile.

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humeral Fractures and Sequalae Compared to Non-Fracture Indications: A Matched Cohort Analysis of Outcome and Complications

Background: With the increase in utility and popularity of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) within the last decades, indications for RTSA have expanded. As well as the established indications such as cuff tear arthropathy and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears, RTSA for complex proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients has been proven to be a reliable treatment option. Methods: A prospectively enrolled RTSA database of 1457 RTSAs implanted between September 2005 and November 2020 was reviewed. Patients treated with RTSA for a complex proximal humerus fracture and fracture sequalae (F-RTSA) were 1:1 matched with a group of patients who were treated electively with RTSA for indications other than a fracture (E-RTSA). Matching criteria included sex, age, length of follow-up and body mass index. Evaluation after a minimum of 2 years follow-up included evaluation of the absolute and relative Constant–Murley score (aCS; rCS), subjective shoulder value (SSV), range of motion (ROM) assessment and complications. Results: Each of the matched cohorts comprised 134 patients with a mean follow-up of 58 ± 41 months for the fracture group and 58 ± 36 months for the elective group. The mean age for both groups was 69 ± 11 years in the F-RTSA and 70 ± 9 years for the E-RTSA group. There were no significant differences in clinical outcome measures including aCS, rCS and SSV (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference in mean active external rotation with 20° ± 18° in the F-RTSA group compared with 25° ± 19° in the E-RTSA group (p = 0.017). The complication rate was not significantly different, with 41 complications in 36 shoulders in the F-RTSA and 40 complications in 32 shoulders in the E-RTSA group (p = 0.73). The main complication for the F-RTSA group was dislocation of the greater tuberosity (6%), whereas acromial fractures (9%) were the leading complication in the E-RTSA group. There was also no significant difference in revision rate comparing F-RTSA with E-RTSA (10% vs. 14%; p = 0.25). Conclusions: RTSA for complex proximal humeral fractures and its sequalae leads to a comparable clinical outcome as that for patients treated electively with RTSA for indications other than fracture. There was, however, a significant difference in active external rotation, with inferior rotation in patients undergoing RTSA for fracture. This valuable information can help in requesting informed consent of patients with proximal humeral fractures.

Two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes following uncemented reverse shoulder replacements for proximal humerus fractures

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty remains regarding the role and long-term outcomes following uncemented reverse shoulder replacements (RSRs) in managing displaced proximal humeral fractures (PHFs). Although RSRs for trauma have traditionally undergone cemented fixation of the humeral component, there is increasing interest in uncemented RSRs. Our primary aim was to evaluate 2-year outcomes following uncemented RSR fixation for 3- and 4-part PHFs in the elderly. A secondary aim was to evaluate if timing of surgery affected outcomes.

METHODS

This cohort series evaluated 2-year outcomes for 42 patients with Neer 3- and 4-part PHFs treated with uncemented RSRs between October 2016 and December 2019. Thirty-eight patients (90%) had clinical and radiologic follow-up at a minimum of 2 years. The primary outcomes compared postoperative range of movement, radiographic outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The PROMs collected included Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSSs), satisfaction scores, and the Friends and Family Test. The secondary outcome involved a subanalysis to see if outcomes were affected by treatment timing-within 2 weeks, 2-12 weeks, and >12 weeks.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 74.1 years (range 58-89). There were 11 males and 31 females. No intraoperative fractures were sustained. There was 1 transient axillary neurapraxia, which fully resolved by 4 months. Three patients required postoperative transfusions. During the study follow-up period, no patients developed either deep infections requiring a washout or dislocation, and none underwent further surgery. At 2-year follow-up, radiologic follow-up demonstrated tuberosity union in 29 of 38 cases (76%). Eight of 38 patients (21%) demonstrated some glenoid notching (Sirveaux 1 or 2 only) on radiographic follow-up. There was no evidence of loosening. The mean OSS was 38 (range 15-48). Mean range of movement achieved at 2 years was as follows: forward flexion 122° (50°-180°), abduction 116° (46°-180°), and external rotation 25° (range 5°-60°). Eighteen patients (47%) described their result as excellent, 17 (45%) as good, and 3 (8%) as poor. When comparing the time from injury to treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in complications or radiographic outcomes between the groups. Patients had a reduced forward flexion when treated between 2 and 12 weeks compared with the other groups (P = .019).

CONCLUSION

Uncemented RSR is a safe treatment option for the management of complex PHFs in the elderly. We report low complication rates, high patient satisfaction, and good outcomes at 2-year follow-up.

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with a Cementless and Metaphyseal Stem Fixation Is a Viable Option for the Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures with Calcar Involvement

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the suitability of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) with a cementless and metaphyseal stem fixation as a treatment for complex proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) with a calcar fragment when this may be fixed with a steel wire cerclage. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared with the same RTSA for PHFs without a calcar fragment at a minimum of five-year follow-up.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on acute PHFs "with a medial calcar fragment" (group A) and "without a calcar fragment" (group B) treated with a RTSA and cementless metaphyseal stem fixation.

RESULTS

At an average follow-up of 6.7 years (5-7.8 years), no statistical difference was observed comparing group A (18 patients) to group B (50 patients) for active anterior elevation (141 ± 15° vs. 145 ± 10°, p = 0.67), active external rotation ER1 (49 ± 15° vs. 53 ± 13°, p = 0.55), and active internal rotation (5 ± 2 vs. 6 ± 2, p = 0.97). Similarly, a comparison of ASES score (89.2 ± 10 vs. 91.6 ± 9, p = 0.23) and Simple Shoulder Test score (91.1 ± 11 vs. 90.4 ± 10, p = 0.49) revealed no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

RTSA with a cementless and metaphyseal stem fixation represents a safe and feasible treatment for complex PHFs with a medial calcar fragment when this may be fixed with a steel wire cerclage.

Cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly-a retrospective case-control study

BACKGROUND

Uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for the primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in elderly patients was introduced at our institution in 2017. Recent reports have raised concerns about increased rates of early bone resorption at the proximal humerus with uncemented fracture stems. The aim of this study was to find out whether there was any difference in functional or radiographic outcomes between cemented and uncemented RTSA for PHF.

METHODS

Seventeen consecutive patients who underwent uncemented RTSA (group nC) in 2017 and 2018 were age and sex matched (propensity score matching 1:2) to 34 patients with cemented RTSA implanted between 2011 and 2016 (group C) for the primary treatment of PHF. These two groups were compared in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes at 2 years after the index surgery.

RESULTS

The mean bone quality was low in both groups: in group nC the deltoid tuberosity index (DTI) was 1.43 (1.22-1.72) and in group C 1.42 (1.22-1.67). At the final 2 year follow-up, the relative CS was 98.3% (71-118) in group nC and 97.9% (36-125) in group C (p = 0.927); the absolute CS was 70.2 (49-89) in group nC and 68.0 (30-94) in group C (p = 0.509). Lucent lines at the humeral site were seen in 8 cases (47%) in group nC and in 13 cases (38%) in group C (p = 0.056). Compared to 3% in group C, all patients in group nC showed at least grade 1 and 65% showed grade 3 bone resorption at the proximal humerus (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared to cemented RTSA bone resorption at the proximal humerus was significantly more frequent in patients with uncemented RTSA for PHF. So far, this is rather a radiographic than a clinical finding, because both groups showed very satisfying functional outcomes and low revision rates at the 2 year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

A retrospective case-control study.

Management of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Adults-A Scoping Review

Proximal humerus fractures are the third most common fracture type in adults, with their incidence increasing over time. There are varied approaches to both the classification and treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Optimal treatments for this fracture type are still widely open to debate. This review summarizes the current and historical treatment modalities for proximal humerus fractures. In this paper, we provide updates on the advances and trends in the epidemiology, classification, and operative and nonoperative treatments of proximal humerus fractures.

Clinical outcomes of cemented vs. uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is an established treatment method for comminuted proximal humerus fractures. Both cemented and uncemented techniques exist, with uncemented reverse total shoulder offering many theoretical advantages, including improved biologic fixation, absence of cement related complications, and ease of revision if necessary. There are few studies comparing the outcomes of the two techniques.

METHODS

The study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A search for studies assessing clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures was performed of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Main outcomes included Constant Score (CS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and complication rate. Inclusion criteria were as follows: indication for arthroplasty was fracture; minimum one year follow up; article in English. Exclusion criteria were as follows: review articles; biomechanical or cadaver studies. Quality analysis was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2) and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool.

RESULTS

A total of 682 studies were identified through the initial search, with 36 studies meeting all inclusion criteria. There were 24 studies investigating cemented technique, 10 studies examining uncemented technique, and two studies involving both techniques. There was no difference in mean follow up between patients receiving a cemented vs. uncemented rTSA (32.3 months vs. 30.6 months, p = 0.06). Patients who received a cemented rTSA had a significantly higher Constant-Murley score than those who received an uncemented rTSA (59.4 vs 55.9, p < .001). There was no difference between the two groups when comparing ASES Scores (77.5 vs 78.6, p = 0.54) and overall complication rates (11.1% vs 11.8%, p = 0.23).

CONCLUSION

Both cemented and uncemented rTSA are both valid options for treating acute proximal humerus fractures. Cemented rTSA may portend slightly improved clinical outcomes with similar overall complication rates compared to uncemented rTSA for proximal humerus fractures.