No difference in clinical outcome at 2-year follow-up in patients with type III and V acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with hook plate or physiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial

Acromioclavicular dislocation associated with fracture of the coracoid process: a series of cases and review of the literature

PURPOSE

Complete acromioclavicular (AC) dislocation associated with fracture of the coracoid process (CP) is uncommon. The strong coracoclavicular ligaments, instead of rupture, may avulse the CP near its base, and with disruption of the AC joint may allow complete dislocation of the clavicle. We report ten cases, one of the largest series in literature, and reviewed the findings and treatment previous reported cases, to allow potential readers to establish the most appropriate treatment.

METHODS

We have prospectively collected those cases in which we had identified an association of an AC dislocation with a fracture of the CP, as well as retrospectively reviewed the records that were coded as AC dislocations and CP fracture looking for this association in the senior author institutions. A literature search was completed on PubMed, Web of Science and Scholar Google, using a sensitive search strategy.

RESULTS

We have collected a total of ten patients with the association of a CP fracture to an AC dislocation in a period of twenty-five years. A review of the cases reported in literature shows a great variability in treatment methods from conservative to more surgically in recent years.

CONCLUSIONS

When an AC dislocation is identified by clinical examination and X-rays, one should be aware of a possible fracture of the CP. It is possible this association to be more frequent than shown in literature because of the CP fracture can easily be missed out or mistaken with an unfussed epiphysis in routine anteroposterior radiography. Multiple approaches have been opted for by surgeons to deal with this combined injury and are the basis of this review.

Noninvasive bracing of acromioclavicular joint dislocations is not superior to early functional rehabilitation and not inferior to surgical stabilization in Rockwood type III and V injuries

BACKGROUND

Treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separations remains controversial. Yet, conservative treatment has become more common even for high-grade injuries. Available conservative treatment does currently however not address the loss of anatomical joint integrity in Rockwood (RW) III and V injuries. In a recent case report, we outlined the concept of restoring ACJ integrity by noninvasively bracing a RW V injury.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical and radiological efficacy of a modern Kenny-Howard splint like brace and compare it to early functional rehabilitation or surgery in RW III and V injuries after a minimum of 12 months.

METHODS

Patients with acute RW III injuries (n = 18) and patients with RW V injuries who refused surgery (n = 7) were prospectively enrolled and treated with an ACJ brace and followed up clinically and radiologicalally for 12 months. Endpoint results were compared to injury grade-, sex-, age-, and follow-up-period-matched patients treated with early functional rehabilitation (n = 23) or surgical TightRope stabilization (n = 23). Clinical outcomes included Constant Score (CS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Taft Score (TS), and modified Acromioclavicular Joint Instability Score (mAJIS) and radiological outcome included coracoclavicular index.

RESULTS

CS, SSV, TS, and mAJIS improved in RW III and CS and SSV in RW V patients over time, when treated with the ACJ brace. Significance was only reached in RW III patients (P < .001). Radiological indices did not improve over time in RW III and V patients. No differences were found when comparing functional and cosmetic outcomes (CS, SSV, TS, mAJIS) after a minimum of 12 months between bracing, surgery, and early functional rehabilitation in RW III and V patients. The coracoclavicular index was most improved in patients treated with surgery compared to bracing after a minimum of 12 months (P = .0011 for RW III).

CONCLUSION

Brace treatment led to comparable clinical and cosmetic outcomes as early functional rehabilitation or surgery in patients with high grade ACJ injuries after a minimum of 12 months. However, no sustainably improved reduction of the ACJ resulted from bracing, when compared to early functional rehabilitation, thus questioning its utility. While surgery ensured radiological improvement compared to bracing, no benefit was seen over early functional rehabilitation.

A ten-year prospective randomized trial comparing non-operative treatment to hook plate fixation for Rockwood III acromio-clavicular dislocation

BACKGROUND

Despite new modern surgical techniques, no short-term functional differences have been demonstrated between operative and non-operative treatment for acute acromio-clavicular (AC) dislocations Rockwood III-V. Few studies describe the long-term clinical and radiological results of these lesions. We aim to compare the one- and ten-year outcome of patients either treated non-operatively or with hook plate fixation for Rockwood III AC lesions.

HYPOTHESIS

Non-operative treatment is not inferior to surgical treatment at short and long-term follow-up when considering patient function and radiological degenerative changes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective randomized trial including 56 consecutive patients aged between 18 and 60, admitted to a level one trauma center for an acute Rockwood III AC joint dislocation. Patients were randomized to two groups: non-operative or surgical treatment with hook plate. Outcome measures were obtained by an independent examiner and included Constant score, DASH score, complications, and radiological results at one and minimum ten years (last visit delayed due to COVID-19 pandemia). Data analysis with a 5% alpha error.

RESULTS

We observed no difference between the two groups for the Constant score at one year (non-operative 93.3 ± 7.4 vs surgical 92.7 ± 6.7, p = 0,41) and ten years (93.3 ± 10 vs 98.2 ± 5.2, p = 0,08). Similar results for all other clinical outcomes were censed. The reoperation rate was higher in the surgical group (88.5 vs 3.3%, p < 0,01), but consisted of hardware removal in most cases. Radiological degenerative changes were present in both groups at ten years (non-operative 33.3% vs surgical 50%, p = 0,24).

DISCUSSION

This study confirmed that non-operative treatment was not inferior to surgical treatment with a hook plate for acute Rockwood III AC joint lesion at both short and long-term follow-up periods. Patients treated non-operatively achieved very high clinical scores, nearly equivalent to normal function. Further research should identify the patient-specific risk factors associated with the rare cases of failed non-operative treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I; randomized controlled study, therapeutic.

Surgeons consider Rockwood classification the most important factor for decision-making in acute, high-grade acromioclavicular dislocations

Purpose

The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of patient-specific factors, including age, lifestyle considerations as well as the extent of injury according to the Rockwood classification (RW), on the surgeon's decision-making in the choice between operative and nonoperative treatment for acute, high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations.

Methods

Orthopaedic and trauma surgeons were requested to complete an online questionnaire consisting of closed and open questions regarding the treatment of acute, high-grade AC joint dislocations and 24 fictive clinical scenarios.

Results

A total of 133 answered questionnaires were collected. 27 different nationalities from five continents were represented. The included participants had a median experience of 12 years (interquartile range: 2-41). Overall, the treatment option for surgery (answer: YES) was chosen in 2426 answers (76% of cases) compared to 'NO' in 766 (24% of cases). RW classification was considered the most important factor influencing surgical decision-making for most surgeons (69%). Two thirds of the participants answered that smoking does not impact their decision towards surgery and as to the influence of body mass index (BMI) on decision-making, half of the respondents would not alter their preferred treatment based on BMI. Finally, there were no significant differences in decision-making regarding the influence of the participant's demographics.

Conclusion

This study highlights that RW classification is the most important factor to consider in the surgeon's decision-making between operative and nonoperative treatment in acute, high-grade AC joint dislocations. Participants preferred operative treatment over nonoperative treatment in acute, high-grade AC joint dislocation in 76% of case scenarios, increasing up to 90% when RW Grade III lesions were not taken into account. These findings contrast with recent studies reporting good functional outcomes of conservatively treated acute, high-grade AC injuries and highlight the need to bridge the gap between evidence and practice.

Level of Evidence

Level V.

Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of High-Grade Acromioclavicular Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis investigated differences between operative and nonoperative management for functional, as well as radiological, outcomes in Rockwood III-V acromioclavicular (AC) injuries. A literature search of several databases was conducted including Elsevier, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to May 28, 2024. Included studies reported patients older than 16 years with a diagnosis of AC joint (ACJ) injury of Rockwood grade III or higher. This review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023431602). Thirteen studies met the eligibility criteria (n = 729) of patients receiving either operative or nonoperative treatment for acute AC injuries. At 24-48 months follow-up, constant score outcomes favored the operative group compared to the nonoperative group (MD = 2.38, 95% CI: 0.14, 4.62; I2 = 66%). Radiological outcomes were in favor of the operative group such that the ACJ width was narrower (MD = -5.60, 95% CI: -6.67, -4.54; I2 = 11%), and the incidence of ACJ dislocations/subluxation was less compared to the nonoperative group (OR = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.07; I2 = 0%). More patients in the nonoperative group had "good" subjective evaluation of results compared to the operative group (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.90; I2 = 80%). There were 54 (18.3%) complications in the operative group. On the other hand, there were 39 (15.9%) adverse events in the nonoperative group. Operative management of Rockwood III-V AC injuries appears to confer greater functional and radiological patient outcomes. Further long-term research is required to elucidate whether this remains longitudinally, with specific investigation for individual Rockwood grading.

Comparative efficacy of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Optimal management of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is still debated. Our aim is to conduct a meta-analysis of clinical studies evaluating the functional outcomes of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search across PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, including only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing exclusively on type III ACJ dislocation. A total of 244 patients from four studies were included. Outcomes measured included Constant scores (CS), coracoclavicular distance (CCD), pain, and complication rates. Heterogeneity was assessed and managed to ensure robust conclusions.

RESULTS

The pooled results showed no significant difference in long-term functional outcomes, measured by CS, between surgical and conservative treatments (MD: 4.82, 95% CI: -6.42 to 16.06, P = 0.400). Surgical treatment provided better early pain relief and superior CCD at all follow-up points but did not improve long-term outcomes. Complication rates were similar for both treatments, though surgical intervention had a higher incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis and hardware-related issues. Conservative treatment resulted in fewer complications and comparable long-term results.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the evidence, while surgical treatment may offer early benefits in pain relief and CCD improvement, it does not enhance long-term functional outcomes and is associated with higher specific complication rates. Conservative treatment provides a viable alternative with fewer complications and similar long-term outcomes. These findings highlight the need for individualized treatment plans based on patient-specific factors and suggest further high-quality, long-term studies to refine management strategies for Type III AC joint dislocations.

Simple Hip Value: a simple score to evaluate Hip function

BACKGROUND

Several self-administered questionnaires are available for assessing hip function in clinical practice (HOOS-12, Oxford-12). These questionnaires can be used to assess and monitor patients with hip pathology. However, they are sometimes difficult to deploy in clinical practice. Recent studies on the shoulder and knee have shown that a single-question assessment provides a relevant evaluation of joint function, and correlates with more complex scores. However, this has not yet been evaluated for the hip. We set out to develop a single-question test that would enable patients to assess their hip function between 0 and 100. Therefore, we did a prospective study aiming to assess: (1) the relevance of the SHV (Simple Hip Value) test by comparing it with the Oxford-12 and HOOS-12 scores, (2) the discriminatory capacity and reproducibility of this test.

HYPOTHESIS

The hypothesis of this study was that the assessment of hip function by a single-question patient-completed questionnaire (PROM) would be reliable and useful in clinical practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective study including 74 patients operated on for total hip arthroplasty from February 2020 to April 2021 in a high-volume center and 20 healthy subjects. The SHV questionnaire, as well as HOOS-12 and OXFORD-12 were submitted on average 18 months after surgery, with values scaled to 100 points. A second test containing the 3 questionnaires was resubmitted to 20 patients randomly chosen from hip arthroplasty group to evaluate the reproducibility of the test. To evaluate the discrimination capacity of our test, 20 controls were selected to respond to the three questionnaires.

RESULTS

Test results were median SHV, Oxford-12 and HOOS-12 scores of 90/100 (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 80-95), 88.5 (IQR: 77.1-95.8) and 79.1 (IQR: 65.1-93.2), respectively. The SHV was strongly correlated with the Oxford-12 (Spearman coefficient: 0.63 [IQR: 0.45-0.76]) and the HOOS-12 (Spearman coefficient: 0.66 [IQR: 0.46-0.79]). The SHV differed significantly from the control group (90.0 vs 100.0 in the control group [p < 0.001]) and had excellent reproducibility (Interclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC]: ICC: 0.82 [CI95%, 0.59-0.93]).

DISCUSSION

The SHV test seems to be a reliable, reproducible and discriminating tool for assessing hip function after total hip arthroplasty, thus offering a simplified and practical approach for practitioners. Further testing in different populations would be useful to validate this test.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; prospective comparative diagnostic study.

[Current treatment concepts of the lateral clavicle and the acromioclavicular joint]

Injurie to the lateral clavicle and acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) are frequent events which are relevant to everyday life and particularly affect active adults at the age of 20-40 years. The Rockwood classification has been established for the classification of ACJ injuries. Lateral clavicle fractures are classified according to the Neer classification or the Jäger and Breitner classification. A newly established classification is the Cho classification. Depending on the injury pattern and in particular the presence of instability, various conservative and surgical care strategies are used. This article provides an overview of the various treatment concepts.

High-energy injuries, combined ligamentous injuries, and joint incongruity as predictors of postoperative shoulder dysfunction in AC joint dislocation surgery

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors associated with postoperative shoulder joint dysfunction in patients who underwent surgical intervention for acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation, with the aim of enhancing preoperative counselling, surgical planning, and postoperative management to optimize functional outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for AC joint dislocation between January 2018 and January 2023 at a hospital orthopaedic centre were enrolled into this retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were patients aged ≥18 years with a documented AC joint dislocation who underwent surgical treatment and had a minimum follow-up period >1 year. Patients with pre-existing shoulder conditions, prior shoulder surgeries, or incomplete medical records were excluded. Visual Analog Scale pain score ≥5 and Constant-Murley Score ≤70 was considered indicative of shoulder joint dysfunction. Statistical analyses included univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify independent risk factors for postoperative shoulder joint dysfunction.

RESULTS

Among 208 included patients, 56 (27%) exhibited shoulder joint dysfunction at the final follow-up. High-energy injury mechanisms, combined coracoclavicular ligament injuries, and lack of coronal plane congruity were identified as significant predictors of postoperative dysfunction. Specifically, high-energy injuries (odds ratio [OR] 5.493, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.068, 14.590), combined coracoclavicular ligament injuries (OR 0.118, 95% CI 0.032, 0.432), and lack of coronal plane congruity (OR 2.540, 95% CI 1.197, 5.387) were associated with an increased risk of poor shoulder function postoperatively. Other factors, such as age, injury mechanism, and postoperative exercise compliance also contributed to the outcomes. Level of evidence: iv.

CONCLUSIONS

Injury mechanism, ligamentous injuries, and joint congruity are important in determining postoperative shoulder function. Accurate joint reduction and diligent postoperative rehabilitation are crucial for optimal recovery. These findings provide valuable insights for improving patient care and surgical outcomes in AC joint dislocation treatment. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore additional factors that may influence postoperative shoulder function.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Nonoperative Treatment and Arthroscopically Assisted Stabilization in Patients With Acute Rockwood Type 5 Acromioclavicular Dislocation

Background

Currently, Rockwood type 3 acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are initially treated nonoperatively, whereas surgery is recommended for Rockwood type 5 dislocations. However, multiple studies have been published favoring nonoperative approaches in patients with high-grade Rockwood injuries.

Purpose

To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with acute Rockwood type 5 AC joint dislocations treated nonoperatively versus with arthroscopically assisted stabilization.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Included were 48 patients with acute Rockwood type 5 dislocation who were initially treated nonoperatively between June 2010 and June 2022 and 48 patients matched according to age, sex, affected side, and follow-up interval who underwent arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular (CC) stabilization using a suture-button technique, with additional percutaneous AC tape cerclage. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on the Subjective Shoulder Value, Nottingham Clavicle Score, Constant score, and visual analog scale for pain. The radiographic assessment included the CC distance, CC difference ratio, and degree of horizontal instability at final follow-up (62 ± 43 months).

Results

At the final follow-up, the Constant score was significantly higher in the nonoperative group (P = .02). The operative group had significantly higher pain levels on palpation of the AC joint (1.2 ± 2.2 vs 0.19 ± 0.5 for the nonoperative group; P = .003). In the operative group, the mean CC difference ratio was significantly higher at the latest follow-up compared with postoperatively (1.3 ± 0.3 vs 0.67 ± 0.3, respectively; P < .001), whereas the CC difference ratio of the nonoperative group was significantly reduced at the latest follow-up compared with postinjury (2.0 ± 0.5 vs 2.6 ± 0.8, respectively; P < .001). The operative group had a significantly lower CC difference ratio compared with the nonoperative group at final follow-up (P < .001). More than half of the patients (56%) who were treated operatively had a loss of reduction resulting in a Rockwood type 3 state at the latest follow-up, whereas 54% of patients treated nonoperatively had spontaneous reduction of injury severity from Rockwood type 5 to Rockwood type 3.

Conclusion

Although 15% of the nonoperatively treated patients eventually required surgery, successful nonoperative treatment showed similar outcomes to initial operative treatment in patients with acute Rockwood type 5 dislocation.

Acromioclavicular joint dislocation Rockwood type III and V show no difference in functional outcome and 91% recovered well without the need for surgery

PURPOSE

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are common injuries, but the indication for and timing of surgery is debated. The objective of the study was to evaluate the results after acute AC joint dislocations Rockwood type III and V treated nonsurgically with the option of delayed surgical intervention.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study with clinical, radiological and patient-reported outcome assessment at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after acute AC joint dislocation. Patients aged 18-60 with acute AC joint dislocation and a baseline panorama (Zanca) radiograph with an increase in the coracoclavicular distance of >25% compared to the uninjured side were eligible for inclusion. All patients were treated nonsurgically with 3 months of home-based training and with the option of delayed surgical intervention. The primary outcome was the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Secondary outcomes were surgery yes/no and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were included. Fifty-seven patients were Rockwood type III and 38 patients were type V. There were no statistically significant differences in WOSI and SPADI between patients with type III and V injuries at any time point. Nine patients (9.5%) were referred for surgery; seven type III and two type V (ns).

CONCLUSION

Ninety-one percent of patients with acute AC joint dislocation Rockwood type III and V recovered without surgery and there were no differences in outcome scores between type III and V at any time point.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Patient-reported, clinical and radiological factors associated with the result after non-surgical management of acute AC joint dislocation Rockwood type III and V

PURPOSE

The treatment of Rockwood type III and V acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations is controversial, and an individualized treatment algorithm is yet to be developed. The objective of this study was to investigate the association of demographical, clinical, patient-reported and radiological variables with the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) score and risk of surgery.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria for this prospective cohort study were patients aged 18-60 with an acute AC joint dislocation with >25% increase in the coracoclavicular distance on bilateral Zanca radiographs. Patients were treated non-surgically with 3 months of home-based training and the option of delayed surgical intervention. The outcomes were the WOSI score and surgery yes/no. Demographical, clinical, patient-reported (WOSI and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index [SPADI]) and radiological variables were collected at baseline and 6 weeks after the injury and investigated for association with the outcomes at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients with Rockwood type III/V AC joint dislocation were included. Pre-injury participation in overhead/collision sports was a risk factor for surgery with an odds ratio of 5 (p = 0.03). Reduced range of motion (ROM) at baseline was associated with reduced WOSI scores and increased risk of surgery. At 6 weeks, reduced ROM, increased SPADI and increased pain during cross-over were associated with the outcomes. Radiological measurements were not correlated with the result. At the 6 weeks follow-up, patients eventually requiring surgery could be detected with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 94% based on a SPADI score of >30 and a ROM ≤ 140° in shoulder flexion or abduction.

CONCLUSION

ROM was the only variable consistently associated with both WOSI and risk of surgery. Six weeks after the injury, it was possible to detect patients in need of surgery based on ROM and SPADI with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 94%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Proximal humerus fracture and acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Proximal humerus fractures and injuries to the acromioclavicular joint are among the most common traumatic diseases of the upper extremity. Fractures of the proximal humerus occur most frequently in older people and are an indicator fracture of osteoporosis. While a large proportion of only slightly displaced fractures can be treated non-operatively, more complex fractures require surgical treatment. The choice of optimal treatment and the decision between joint-preserving surgery by means of osteosynthesis or endoprosthetic treatment is often a difficult decision in which both fracture morphology factors and individual factors should be taken into account. If endoprosthetic treatment is indicated, satisfactory long-term functional and clinical results have been achieved with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint occur primarily in young, athletic individuals. The common classification according to Rockwood divides the injury into 6 degrees of severity depending on the dislocation. This classification forms the basis for the decision on non-operative or surgical treatment. The indication for surgical treatment for higher-grade injuries is the subject of controversial debate in the latest literature. In chronic injuries, an autologous tendon transplant is also performed. Whereas in the past, treatment was often carried out using a hook plate, which was associated with complications, the gold standard today is minimally invasive treatment using Endobutton systems. This review provides an overview of the two injury patterns and discusses the various treatment options.

Current Concepts in Management of Acromioclavicular Joint Injury

Background: The management of acromioclavicular joint injuries requires a thorough understanding of the anatomy and biomechanics of the joint, as well as knowledge of the pertinent physical exam findings and classification to determine an appropriate treatment approach, whether operative or nonoperative. In this article, we present a narrative review of the current state of understanding surrounding these issues. Although there are a large number of options for operative intervention, we additionally present our experience with anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) with imbrication of the deltoid fascia. Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data on a total of 45 patients who had undergone ACCR between 2003 and 2016 were collected. Results: We found that improvements were seen in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) (53 ± 19 to 81 ± 23), Simple Shoulder Test (SST) (6 ± 3 to 12 ± 13), Constant-Murley (CM) (60 ± 18 to 92 ± 8), and Rowe (67 ± 14 to 89 ± 11) and the mean post-operative SANE score was 86 ± 17. Conclusions: ACCR has the advantage of addressing both horizontal and vertical stability with good outcomes.

The V angle compliments radiographic assessment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations by differentiating between Rockwood types III versus V and by considering dynamic horizontal translation in coronal radiographs

PURPOSE

Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations are usually graded radiographically according to Rockwood, but differentiation between Rockwood types III and V may be ambiguous. The potentially clinically relevant horizontal instability is barely addressed in coronal radiographs. It was hypothesized that a new radiologic parameter (V angle) would complement ACJ diagnostics on anteroposterior radiographs by differentiating between cases of Rockwood III and V while also considering the aspect of dynamic horizontal translation (DHT).

METHODS

Ninety-five patients with acute ACJ dislocations (Rockwood types III and V) were included retrospectively between 2017 and 2020. On anteroposterior views (weightbearing: n = 62, non-weight-bearing: n = 33), the coracoclavicular (CC) distance and the newly introduced V angle for assessing scapular orientation were measured bilaterally. This angle is referenced between the spinal column and a line crossing the superior scapular angle and the crossing point between the supraspinatus fossa and the medial base of the coracoid process, reported as the side-comparative difference (non-injured side *minus* injured side). DHT on Alexander views was divided into stable, partially unstable or completely unstable.

RESULTS

The V angle on the injured side alone (mean 50.0°; 95% confidence interval (CI), 48.6°-51.3°) showed no correlation with the side-comparative CC distance [%] (r = - 0.040; n.s.). Thus, the V angle on the non-injured side was considered, displaying a normal distribution (n.s.) with a mean of 58.0° (95% CI, 56.6°-59.4°). The side-comparative V angle showed a correlation with the side-comparative CC distance (r = 0.83; p < 0.001) and was able to differentiate between Rockwood types III (4.7°; 95% CI, 3.9°-5.5°; n = 39) and V (10.3°; 95% CI, 9.7°-11.0°; n = 56) (p < 0.001). A cut-off value of 7° had a 94.6% sensitivity and an 82.1% specificity (area under curve, AUC: 0.954; 95% CI, 0.915-0.994). The side-comparative V angle was greater for cases with complete DHT (8.7°; 95% CI, 7.9°-9.5°; n = 78) than for cases with partial DHT (4.8°; 95% CI, 3.3°-6.3°; n = 16) (p < 0.001). A cut-off value of 5° showed a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 66.7% (AUC 0.824; 95% CI, 0.725-0.924).

CONCLUSION

The scapular-based V angle on anteroposterior radiographs distinguishes between Rockwood types III and V as well as cases with partial or complete DHT.

STUDY DESIGN

Diagnostic study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Clavicular Tunnel Widening After Acromioclavicular Stabilization Shows Implant-Dependent Correlation With Postoperative Loss of Reduction

PURPOSE

To radiographically describe, quantify, and compare clavicular tunnel widening (cTW) of 2 different types of stabilization devices and investigate a possible correlation between cTW and loss of reduction.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of single-center registry data, we compared patients who were treated for an acute AC dislocation (Rockwood types III to V) with either the AC Dog Bone (DB) or low-profile AC (LP) repair systems. On 6-week and 6-month postoperative radiographs, we measured clavicle height and tunnel diameter. We calculated the button/clavicle filling (B/C) ratio to quantify how much of the clavicular tunnel height is covered by the low-profile inlet. The association between B/C ratio and the extent of cTW was defined, and we also compared cTW between treatment groups. Reduction of the AC joint was graded as either stable, partially dislocated or dislocated depending on the AC ratio. A 2-sample t-test was used for comparing cTW progression between the 2 groups. For continuous variables between more than 2 groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used.

RESULTS

Of 65 eligible patients, there were 37 and 28 included in the DB and LP groups, respectively. Overall, cTW was conically shaped with transclavicular widening noted in the DB group and cTW developing strictly inferior to the button in the LP group. For both implants, mean maximal cTW was 7.1 mm and located at the inferior cortex; the B/C ratio was not associated with increased inferior cTW (r = -0.23, P = .248). Only LP patients with complete loss of reduction had significantly increased cTW (P = .049).

CONCLUSIONS

Conical-shaped cTW is a common implant-independent phenomenon after AC stabilization using suture-button devices. It occurs only at the suture-bone interface and is less excessive for the LP implant. There is an association between increased cTW and loss of reduction specific to the LP implant only.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Complications after operative treatment of high-grade acromioclavicular injuries

BACKGROUND

Treatment of Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries remains controversial. Numerous reconstruction techniques have been proposed. The purpose of this study was to describe the complication profile in a large cohort of patients who underwent surgical management of AC joint separations using a variety of reconstruction strategies.

METHODS

All patients who underwent surgery for AC joint injuries from 2013 to 2019 at a single institution were identified. Chart review was performed to capture patient demographics, radiographic measurements, operative techniques, postoperative complications, and revision surgery. Structural failure was defined as a radiographic loss of reduction of greater than 50% when comparing immediate and final postoperative imaging. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for complications and revision surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 279 patients included in the study, 66 (24%) had type III separations, 20 (7%) type IV, and 193 (69%) type V. Fifty-three percent underwent surgery acutely (<6 weeks of injury), and 40% were chronic (>3 months). A total of 252 of the 279 surgeries (90%) were performed open and 27 (10%) were arthroscopically assisted. Allograft was used in 164 of 279 (59%) cases. Specific operative techniques (with or without allograft) included hook plating (1%), modified Weaver Dunn (16%), cortical button fixation (18%), and suture fixation (65%). At mean 28-week follow-up, 108 complications were identified in 97 patients (35%). Complications were identified at mean 20 ± 21 weeks. Sixty-nine structural failures (25%) were identified. Persistent AC joint pain requiring injection, clavicle fracture, adhesive capsulitis, and hardware complications were the other most common complications. Twenty-one patients (8%) underwent unplanned revision surgery at mean 38 ± 28 weeks after the index procedure, with the most common indication for structural failure, hardware complications, or fracture of the clavicle or coracoid. Patients who had surgery after 6 weeks from injury had a significantly greater risk of having a complication (odds ratio [OR] 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-7.77, P = .009) and a significantly greater risk of having structural failure (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.38-5.28, P = .004). Patients who had an arthroscopic technique had a greater risk of structural failure (P = .002). Complications, structural failure, and revision surgery were not significantly correlated with use of allograft or specific operative techniques.

CONCLUSION

Surgical management of AC joint injuries is associated with a relatively high complication profile. Loss of reduction in the postoperative period is common. However, the revision surgery rate is low. These findings are important for patient preoperative counseling.

Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Acute Rockwood Type 3 Acromioclavicular Injury

Background

Evidence for the superiority of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of Rockwood type 3 acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is still lacking.

Hypothesis

It was hypothesized that surgical treatment will outperform nonsurgical treatment.

Study Design

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods

A prospective randomized trial involving 4 study centers was performed from January 1, 2011, to March 31, 2016. A total of 85 patients with acute Rockwood type 3 ACJ dislocations were allocated randomly to receive either nonsurgical or surgical treatment. A total of 70 patients were treated as allocated, and 8 patients made an early crossover from nonsurgical to surgical treatment, leaving 47 patients treated surgically and 31 patients nonsurgically. All patients were followed up longitudinally, including clinical evaluation using the Constant score and standardized radiographic evaluation, with final follow-up after 2 years.

Results

At no follow-up time point was there a significant difference in Constant score between the surgically and nonsurgically treated patients. Radiographic analysis showed not only an inferior coracoclavicular distance at all follow-up points for surgical treatment but also a higher incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis and heterotopic ossifications, without any negative clinical correlation. With regard to complications, 1 patient (3%) in the nonsurgical group underwent secondary surgical ACJ stabilization. The revision rate after surgical treatment was 17% (P < .001). Neither primary horizontal instability nor younger age were associated with inferior clinical outcomes after nonsurgical treatment.

Conclusion

Surgical treatment of ACJ Rockwood type 3 injuries did not lead to superior functional outcomes. Neither younger age nor horizontal instability were associated with inferior outcomes after nonsurgical treatment. Surgical treatment led to a slower recovery and to higher complication and revision rates.

Registration

ISRCTN registry (study ID: ISRCTN92265154).

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries in Sport

ABSTRACT

Sport-related shoulder injuries, including disruptions to the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ), are common. An ACJ injury is classified by the degree and direction of the clavicle displacement. Although the diagnosis can be made clinically, standard radiographic views are important to determine the severity of the ACJ disruption and assess for concurrent injuries. The majority of ACJ injuries can be managed nonoperatively; however, surgical treatment is indicated in some cases. Long-term outcomes are generally favorable for most ACJ injuries, and athletes generally return to sport without functional limitations. This article provides an in-depth discussion regarding all aspects of ACJ injuries, including clinically relevant anatomy, biomechanics, evaluation, treatment, and complications.

Management of Acromioclavicular Injuries - Current Concepts

Introduction

Treatment of a patient with acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injury remains challenging for orthopedic surgeons. To date, there is debate over the optimal management of ACJ injuries. This review provides an overview of assessment, treatment, and future perspectives for the treatment of and research into ACJ.

Material and Methods

A scoping literature review was performed. The search was built including the following terms: acromioclavicular joint injuries or dislocation, and pathophysiology, etiology, anatomy, treatment, and trauma mechanism. The papers with evidence levels 1-3 were included in the current narrative review.

Results

A total of 2242 potential relevant studies were identified in the searches. After removal of duplicates, 432 studies were screened on their titles and abstracts, resulting in 35 studies being included in the review, based on the eligibility criteria.

Conclusion

The management of acute and chronic ACJ injuries is not clarified in the current literature. However, there is currently insufficient high-level evidence for the overall treatment options for ACJ injuries. If surgical intervention is decided upon in consultation with the patient, the complications may not outweigh the benefits. The multitude of existing techniques is indicative of the uncertainty surrounding this issue, and no gold standard has yet been established for treatment methods. An ideal classification would include not only vertical and horizontal instability, but also the severity of kinematic alterations of the shoulder complex. This indicates the need for a new and improved diagnostic tool for the classification of ACJ injuries.

Superior clinical results for early arthroscopic treatment of grade IIIb and V acromioclavicular joint instability compared to delayed operative treatment

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopy-assisted cortical fixation devices have been increasingly used in the operative management of both acute and chronic cases of acromioclavicular joint instability (ACJI). It has been hypothesized that delayed surgical management leads to inferior clinical and radiologic outcomes compared to acute treatment. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes, scapula dyskinesia, and failure or revision rates of arthroscopically treated acute and chronic ACJI.

METHODS

This retrospective study of prospectively collected data included all surgically treated patients with grade IIIb and V chronic ACJI between 2013 and 2017, matched 1:1 to a group of acute grade IIIb and V ACJI patients treated during the same time period. Chronic ACJI was defined as delayed surgical treatment >21 days after injury. Chronic cases received an additional hamstring autograft next to the suture pulley systems. Follow-up was obtained at an average of 3.2 years (range: 1.4-6.2). Clinical outcome scores included the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), Taft Score (TF), Nottingham Clavicle Score (NCS), ACJI Score, Sick Scapula Score (SSS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Subjective Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, and the visual analog scale pain score. Radiologic follow-up was obtained pre- and postoperatively and at final follow-up. The 2-year results were compared to the results of a 1:1 matched-pair group comprising patients who were treated with an acute ACJI during the same period.

RESULTS

Thirty-three (80.5%) of 41 chronic ACJI cases were available for follow-up and were compared with 33 matched-pair cases of acute ACJI (of 41). The clinical scores were significantly better in the acute cohort for the CMS (92 ± 8 vs. 88 ± 8, P = .030), ASES (91 ± 13 vs. 85 ± 13, P = .002), SSS (1.4 ± 1.6 vs. 3.4 ± 2.5, P = .0004), NCS (86 ± 13 vs. 81 ± 13, P = .049), TF (9.9 ± 1.9 vs. 9.0 ± 2.1, P = .030), and ACJI (83 ± 13 vs. 75 ± 1, P = .003). In contrast to the chronic cohort, the acute cohort illustrated a significant loss of reduction at follow-up (P = .020).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this study, early arthroscopy-assisted operative treatment of grade IIIb and V ACJIs seems superior to delayed surgical intervention of grade IIIb and V ACJIs. Furthermore, an additional autograft loop leads to less loss of reduction compared with suture pulley/suspensory loop fixation standalones.